karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: I would say there are a few things in terms of kind
of building collaboration alignment.
One, is the one where people say, leave the ego at your, at the door, right?
It's if you have an approach that's my way or the highway, it's very difficult
to build collaborative initiatives, right?
Need to come with the mentality of, my agenda may not be exactly the
same as every other organization's agenda, but there's enough common
issues that we want to join on that we can work together on those issues,
voiceover: A key component of the modern world economy, the chemical
industry delivers products and innovations to enhance everyday life.
It is also an industry in transformation where chemical executives and
workers are delivering growth and industry changing advancements while
responding to pressures from investors, regulators, and public opinion.
Discover how leading companies are approaching these challenges
here on The Chemical Show.
Join Victoria Meyer, president of Progressio Global and host of The
Chemical Show, As she speaks with executives across the industry and
learns how they are leading their companies to grow, transform, and push
industry boundaries on all frontiers.
Here's your host, Victoria Meyer.
Victoria: Hi, this is Victoria Meyer.
Welcome back to The Chemical Show, where chemicals means business.
Today, I am speaking with Karin Kirchnick of the American Chemistry
Council, also known as ACC.
Karin is the Managing Director of Sustainability for ACC.
She's an environmental lawyer by training and has been working throughout her career
to improve policies and procedures related to sustainable development worldwide.
Prior to joining ACC, Karin worked at the World Bank where she partnered
with over 300 companies to in multi stakeholder mechanisms, that's a tongue
twister to advance programs, projects, and policy reform to accelerate action to
meet the sustainable development goals.
There's a lot more that I can talk about with Karin and we're going to
get to it as we have our conversation.
So Karin, welcome to The Chemical Show.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Thank you.
Thanks for having me.
Victoria: I'm really glad to have you here.
Let's just start out with a little bit on your career.
And what prompted your interest in environmental law and ultimately
a career in sustainability?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: So I'll be honest.
My original intent was to be a criminal lawyer.
And I do watch a lot of the criminal law shows these days to make up the
fact that didn't go into criminal law.
Victoria: There we go.
Yeah,
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: but I, so it was actually when I was in law school,
I international environmental law was beginning to be like an emerging field.
And, my family had always been, interested in environmental issues.
We immigrated from what was Czechoslovakia.
I was born in Slovakia.
So it was also right after the fall of the wall and the new Central and
Eastern Europe that was emerging and international environmental
law was an emerging area as well.
So I decided to go into that and then from there really build it into bringing
that expertise in what was sustainable development to Central Eastern Europe
and the newly independent states.
So my first work out after law school was actually based in Slovakia
Czechoslovakia, now Slovakia working on environmental issues, looking
at air, water, and waste issues.
And then from there started working in the other countries in Central Eastern Europe.
So it was a combination of kind of family background history,
But also a new and emerging area.
Environmental law, it was an area in international law, but
international environmental law was really beginning to take hold.
And to me it was really intriguing and I did want to spend my
career working around the world.
So it came together in that way.
Victoria: that's really cool.
I did not realize that you had really started out being very global.
And as you say, focusing on Slovakia and addressing the environmental topics there.
Now Chernobyl was obviously a big issue in Eastern Europe.
And when, was that around the time that you were coming out?
I don't even remember what year that was.
So was that
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: It's a really honestly, I that's a good question.
And when was Chernobyl?
I
should know
because my one of my mom's cousins worked for the atomic
power plant that was in Slovakia.
But we were always focused on that atomic power plant.
So to be honest, I don't remember.
But the issues around the kind of formal Central Eastern Europe and what
the environmental health looked like after all those decades, including
Chernobyl, depending on when that happened definitely was a key topic, right?
In, in terms of trying to address what were legacy issues, but also what is
like the new environmental law field look like for the newly independent states in
Central and Eastern European countries.
Victoria: So my bias being an American and and frankly, just not knowing a
lot about Eastern Europe is I have an assumption that it just that the laws
were not as rigorous as perhaps they were in the U S and Europe, as they
approached environmental concerns.
Is that true?
Is that a fair statement?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: It's a fair statement in that I remember,
it's funny you spring that up because actually when I was working and I lived
in Russia, I was working in Russia also in, in this was the late 90s
we couldn't find a term for the word enforcement and you had to use basically
like several sentences of Russian to convey what you mean by enforcement.
So it's true.
Yes, it was definitely the strictness was not there, but also
the kind of the comprehensiveness right around environmental
law, regulations and policies.
The basics were there.
They have codes, right?
Water code, all the different codes, but in terms of kind of the depth
that you would say, here in the U.
S.
Certainly was not there, but it was an emerging area.
Certainly.
Okay.
Victoria: And obviously we know that, across the globe, the US
being no exception, that enforcement has not always been consistent.
In fact, my husband and I just watched the movie, Erin Brockovich last night.
And it's been many years since I watched it and it's a great movie
and it's Oh yeah, a lot of nastiness has happened from an environmental
perspective for a variety of reasons.
So I'm really glad number one, I'm glad that we're living
in the times that we're in.
And as challenging as some of our policies and getting agreement on
policies can be, I also recognize it's, it is creating a better life and
environment for myself, my family, my peers, the people around us, et cetera.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Absolutely.
Yeah, I will say if I can do a shout out, I worked for a period
of time for the American Bar Association, so they had a Central
and Eastern European law initiative
That they developed, which was really about bringing, lawyers from the U.
S.
with, backgrounds and experiences in different fields of law.
It wasn't just environmental in terms of how to bring these
concepts and ideas around.
A law reform forward.
So it was great.
Working with judges, law students, prosecutor offices, the whole
gamut of the legal system is really incredible experience.
Victoria: That would be really awesome.
I can imagine.
And then you spent a big part of your career most recently at the World Bank
and focusing in, I think a lot on water.
Is that right?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: I did.
So I was managing what's called the 2030 water resources group.
It was actually an initiative that had been founded by the World Economic
Forum and then moved over in transition.
The World Economic Forum transitions develops initiatives and then transitions
to other hosting institutions.
So it moved over the World Bank.
And then that's when I was hired to come in and manage the 2030 Water
Resources Group, which has water in the title, water is so cross cutting.
So worked with agriculture, technology, textiles, mining companies, the whole
gamut, because water touches everything.
And the idea was really building these multi stakeholder platforms.
As you said, the term multi stakeholder platforms, it's an
important term, but a lot to say there in terms of bringing governments.
Industry companies and organizations, non government organizations
together to work on different issues.
In this case, it was related to water, but it really was very,
cross cutting and very broad.
As I said, since water touches everything.
Victoria: Yeah.
All right.
So I was going to ask this question later, but I'm going to bring
it forward in our conversation.
Building alignment is such a challenge.
Building alignment inside of a company when, you're all working
theoretically for the same purpose with the same interests is challenging.
And then building alignment across multiple stakeholders
is is a real challenge.
And what have you found to be.
the real critical, significant things that help to get to that alignment.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: So I would say there are a few things in terms of
kind of building collaboration alignment.
One, is the one where people say, leave the ego at your, at the door, right?
It's if you have an approach that's my way or the highway, it's very difficult
to build collaborative initiatives, right?
Need to come with the mentality of, my agenda may not be exactly the same
as every other organization's agenda, but there's enough common issues
that we want to join on that we can work together on those issues, right?
You don't have to have everything in alignment, right?
If you think about, your spouses or partners or close friends, it's not
that you agree on everything, right?
But there's enough something there, a core that you agree on that you say, okay, we
want to have this collaboration, right?
And that's with organizations, I would say the same as well.
The other I would say is patience.
Because it's a lot of times I've found in my career.
You're taking two steps forward and maybe five steps backwards.
Sometimes it seems like it's not always like the steps forward.
There are sometimes steps back because you need to look again at where is
that common agenda or there might be differences of opinions that you just
need to work through or your approach or methodologies or whatever it may be.
So having that patience is important.
And then I would say communication.
You really, for collaborative.
Initiatives to work, there needs to be an open channel of communication.
And it's not to say that, you have to put your, wear your heart on your sleeve
and kind of put everything out there.
But you need to be openly communicative enough that when there are some
differences, you can work through them.
And that's where that patience comes in as well.
But at the core, having some sort of a common agenda to be able to
say, okay, we're going to work on this together and we have certain
outcomes that we want to achieve.
And that's what we're going to put foremost in this collaboration.
Victoria: Yeah.
I think that's great.
And I think as you maybe started with certainly having this
belief of positive intent, that everybody's got a positive intent in.
trying to achieve their outcomes and their desired objectives may not be
aligned, but the positive intent that they're doing this to make positive
progress is so critical because it helps move past some of the disagreements.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Exactly.
And I said, it, like I said, it doesn't mean that you have to agree on everything.
But there needs to be enough of that core, and as you said, the positive
intent for what you want to achieve and that you're willing to, when you have
those steps backwards, then you're set.
It's not that you give up on the collaboration, right?
There's enough there.
You say, okay we're going to keep moving forward and ultimately in the end,
hopefully for those positive outcomes.
Victoria: That's great.
So let's turn the focus a little bit to ACC.
So you've been there now a couple of years.
Tell us, what's your role?
What's your focus at ACC?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: So I managing sustainability, which is great.
And we have one of the things I think I would say that attracted me to ACC is
we have the foundation of responsible care for the last 35 years, right?
That is the foundation around safety and sustainability.
The chemical industry in terms of advancing responsible
care I think is incredible.
That already is a foundation that's there.
And that really attracted me.
So coming in this role for sustainability, which, has been a
evolving um, division within ACC.
Sustainability is still very much evolving.
It's one of those things.
I've been working on it for 25, 28 years.
And I think in the last few years, the pace of change is
unlike what it was 20 years ago.
I mean now, when I look back then it's boy, it was like molasses in
terms of sustainability issues.
But it's really rapidly advancing.
And so it's ACC as well, to be proactive and looking at these issues.
There are a number of areas that we work on, of course, climate change.
That's always on everybody's mind in terms of how do we
lower greenhouse gas emissions?
How do we catalyze innovation and so forth?
The other areas around water which is an area that I have focused a
lot on, even though my background really, I've, worked on climate, air,
water, waste issues, water is always, something there that is intriguing
in terms of addressing water issues.
And.
It's ACC, one of, within our sustainability work is also
one of our priorities as well.
The other area of work for us is around air.
So in improving and addressing air quality is another area, which is again, I've
worked on, so it's really interesting to be able to work with the chemical
industry and advancing air quality.
The other is around sustainable chemistry.
And how to.
Promote innovation in terms of a sustainable chemistry going forward,
and then the last areas really cross cutting is circularity, right?
There's a lot that's been over the last few years around circularity.
What do we mean by circularity?
How do we move from something that was linear to circular?
But how do you do that within all aspects of circularity?
In terms of reuse, reducing and so forth, as well as the innovation there.
So those are the key areas that we're working on sustainability.
We work supporting our members.
So as new and emerging areas are coming up as well, we're making sure that
we're tracking and looking to see how we can support our members to really
be at the forefront of sustainability.
Victoria: And in sustainability to say you've been working in this space
for, 25 years It's certainly evolved.
I agree with you that the pace of change and the pace of interest in the focus
on sustainability has rapidly increased at the same time I've talked with some
people who are like we're getting a little tired of talking sustainability
first that there really has to be a business case and that sustainability
needs to, it's critical and it's an underpinning but it's not all of business.
And so I think striking that balance is something that companies are
working on and maybe struggling with.
And maybe you see that when you guys work with your constituents.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: That's true.
I would say that's true.
But I think if we look at sustainability overall, if you think
about sustainability and kind of the origins of sustainable development,
the definition, so forth, back then, if you look at different processes,
especially UN processes and other processes, it was really governments.
That we're discussing sustainable development,
setting, agenda 21 and so forth.
And then the non governmental organizations came in and
private sector came in later.
I have to say I was in New York when the sustainable development
goals were being adopted, and I've been involved in kind of the U.
N.
Commission on Sustainable Development for, I guess 10 years at that point,
and it was the first time that the private sector was actually addressed
by governments to say, as a key partner or in as part of sustainability and
the sustainable development agenda.
And that wasn't that long ago, if we think about it.
And I think the other challenge too at that time was, many were, I'm not
saying everyone, but a lot of people were looking at industry as kind
of an ATM machine, of just bring in money to solve sustainability issues.
And that's not the right approach, right?
is part of the solutions, and I see that even with our chemical
industry, our members really being the enablers of a sustainable future.
But you're right.
It does take time to build that business case.
And it looks different for everyone, right?
We have small and medium sized members.
We have large members for small and medium sized members.
There's a lot that people are trying to manage.
There's, they don't have entire sustainability departments.
And so it takes time and that's where I think, that when I alluded to
kind of patients, important, right?
Because it does, you do have to build that business case.
And even in my previous role at the World Bank, when we were building
partnerships, we had to build the business case, but it takes time because it can
look different for everyone involved.
Victoria: I Think that's a great point.
Because everybody's contributing differently, coming at it
differently, has different resources.
So when you talk about the setting of the sustainable development goals
and it's what the UN has, is it 22?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: 20, there are 17 goals.
Victoria: That's it.
Okay.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: goals.
Yeah, because 17, actually number 17 is around partnerships, which
Victoria: Oh, which is
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: one.
Victoria: Yeah.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: I had been involved in the Millennium
Development Goals, actually.
And then the new development of the Sustainable Development Goals.
And
Victoria: Yeah.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: were added as number 17.
Victoria: Makes perfect sense, really.
And it, did that, did those get established around the same
time as the Paris Agreement, or were they separate from that?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Oh, geez,
Victoria: So the Paris,
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: me too much
Victoria: oh my gosh, I'm asking you history questions.
So we'll, so
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: dates.
Victoria: we're gonna,
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: have, I
Victoria: we're gonna,
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: have come with a little cheat sheet
Victoria: I know, it's okay.
You can send it to me later and we'll include it.
How's that?
The cheat sheet for when all these agreements went in place.
But I think what's significant, in fact, if I think about dates and we just look
ahead, certainly the Paris Agreement talks about limiting Temperature increased
to less than two degrees centigrade.
It's tied to net I personally view it as being tied to net zero by 2050.
There's obviously some goals around 2030 and I've never 100 percent clear
quite handedly on what's our 2030 goal.
And so there's a lot of different goals out there.
You talk about this is a public private partnership collaboration opportunity and
clearly the chemical industry, has to take action on it is, and it is the key enabler
or a enabler of the energy transition of achieving some of these net zero goals.
Can you talk about that a little bit more and how you and how ACC sees this?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Yeah.
Absolutely.
The chemical industry, to me, it's incredible because it's
really As you said, the energy, the future, the enabler, right?
The chemical industry contributes, in terms of looking at, if we look
at renewables even kind of wind and solar and, electric vehicles and
batteries, like all of that depends on.
Chemistry, right?
And so bringing that aspect of contributing to a lower emissions
future at the same time, also looking at our own emissions, right?
How do we reduce our own emissions and our processes and so forth?
And that's where ACC where working our members in terms of
trying to see how we can do that.
Realistically, of course, right?
Because as we look at different technologies, ACC we've been looking
how to advance carbon capture utilization and storage, right?
Clean hydrogen, right?
Other aspects of different innovative technologies that are all different
stages of innovation and development.
How do we drive forward on those different abatement technologies
and the processes looking at, In the future of nuclear, right?
And electrification, of course, as a possibility in the future.
But we know from also our collaboration and a lot of discussions we have, for
example, with agencies like Department of Energy and others, these technologies are
still in processes of development, right?
And our members and ACC, we're looking to see how do we do foster those
collaborations, that information sharing.
Because it will take time for these technologies to be at the
point that they're really scalable.
And so that's where we're really driving forward.
I would say both from the kind of contributing to that renewable
future from the products, that the chemical companies are promoting and
advancing, but also in terms of, Own emissions reductions technologies.
You know what can be that mix there in terms of driving for
that future, but it will again.
It comes back to that patience, right?
I think everybody wants something overnight and it's that's not the case.
Victoria: And I think that's right.
And it's a big set of puzzle pieces that all have to come
together at the same time.
And they're not going to come together at the same time.
Maybe it's really if we think about how we have to build a puzzle.
Build the outside edges first, right?
Find all your outer edges and then start filling in.
And it seems like the climate challenge, finding solutions to the
climate challenge and sustainability is a bit like building a puzzle.
Different people have different approaches on it, but at the end of
the day, it all has to come together.
Bit by bit, piece by piece.
And I know one of the challenges when I talk to my clients and other companies is
sometimes it feels like there's a bit of a misalignment between regulators and the
regulations that are in place, maybe the.
Timing and how they're assessing new technologies that are needed,
critically needed to support the future chemical industry that we
want, the future world that we want.
When we think about that.
How do you recommend people tackle this challenge.
How can companies influence it?
How is ACC working to influence that?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: That's a great question.
And you're right.
It is a puzzle, right?
With different pieces coming in at different times.
I think it comes back to the point I made earlier about communication, right?
And this is one of the things that ACC is working with different agencies to
see how can we bring industry to the table so that everybody understands the
role of the chemical industry, right?
Because I think a lot is, people just not understanding and the
role of the chemical industry.
And so it's fostering that first that understanding and that
awareness of what it will take.
The chemical industry, as I said, our members are actively working
to address sustainability issues.
But again, these things can't be done in silos.
So how can we, work with different agencies and others to bring industry to
the table to actually look at as you said, the timing it is an evolution process.
If we look at different technologies, CCUS or even clean hydrogen, I mentioned and
so forth even direct air capture, right?
It's excuse me, it's an early stages, right?
It's not at the point, even agencies will say it's not scalable.
To get to scale.
That's always the big challenge.
I found that throughout my career, honestly, with different any types
of innovations or technologies, people get stuck when going to scale.
And that's where I think the collaboration is really critical because everyone
then can bring in those different pieces of the jigsaw Puzzle together
as opposed to at different times.
And then, as you said, it doesn't seem maybe misaligned or it's
one depends on the other, right?
Especially if you're trying to drive innovation and certainly for American
Chemistry Council, we want to make sure we have a strong chemical manufacturing
sector in the United States, right?
And so how do we advance policies and initiatives?
To make sure that is the case, right?
That the U S is in the lead when it comes to a strong chemical
industry that contributes to all the products that everyone wants to
have in their daily lives, right?
Victoria: Yeah, I think it's right.
And I think patience is the key.
It doesn't feel like we have a lot of time though, so just as we were
talking to get started here we are basically at the end of the first
quarter and boy, that was fast.
And soon we're going to be at 2030.
Which is where a lot of targets are and not too far away is 2050
in the grand scheme of things.
It's maybe you have to slow down to go fast, right?
There's that whole theory, but it feels like we have to keep marching
along because the clock keeps ticking.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: No, it's true.
We have to we can't sit back and rest.
That's for sure.
We have to keep innovation.
And I know with our ACC members from the smallest members to our largest
members are dedicated and research and development to really bring the newest
when it comes to technologies and processes for a sustainable future, right?
And a healthy environment especially as our members, work in communities,
in, in engaging communities and so forth in a healthy environment,
but it is that one of Be realistic.
Don't look too far to the future.
And then you miss how you put those pieces together now, right?
And I think, it's that one of that kind of trying to trace, stay present, right?
You're learning from what's happened in the past and you're looking to the
future, but really staying present to see what do we need to do today that will
have that domino effect for the future.
And that's not always easy to do, because you're right.
We're always saying, okay, we need to, we're like hamsters in the wheel rushing.
We want to get there fast and we will get there.
And even for me, as I said, we've been talking here and I probably shouldn't
have admitted how long I've been working on sustainability, it's amazing where we
are today compared to, 20 some years ago.
Right.
Victoria: it's very different.
I first, I remember when I first really became aware of sustainability as
sustainability, and I was working at Shell and we had a sustainability, all of a
sudden we had that sustainability people.
And I remember saying Oh, I don't understand.
I don't understand.
What is it that you're talking about?
I don't understand.
Of course, I'm not sure that I fully vocalized it.
Cause of course in the corporate world, you can't always vocalize when the,
those under misunderstandings are, but it took quite a while because for
those people that are working closely with it, it's easier to understand,
but it's really just gotten into everyday vocabulary for business in
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: very true
Victoria: The last five years.
Up until then.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: I agree you.
Victoria: It was not an everyday conversation,
strategic decision, et cetera.
It was understood.
We understood the environmental aspects.
We understood safety,
We didn't necessarily know how to put it all together and I kind of group
sustainability is putting it all together.
And that may be.
Incorrect as well in some ways because it's got a, but it's got a lot of
tentacles and how it all connects.
But it really, until the last five years, it has not been an everyday conversation
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: No, that's true.
If you look at even the admin growth of chief sustainability
officer positions, right?
Or even I was just reading the other day about an ESG controller position, right?
These positions have been growing only in the last few years.
If those were not there 20 years ago, I can vouch for that.
and it will be something different in the next 5, 10, 20 years, right?
It's going to continue to evolve.
That's exactly right.
And you're right with sustainability.
It is one of those areas.
And I think this is where, even when we look at the sustainable development
goals, it's been such an evolution because they yes, they stand on their
own, but it's the interconnectedness that's really important, right?
As we touched on water, right?
Climate and water are related, right?
And so you could say, okay, I'm only focused on climate
or I'm only focused on water.
But at some point, They're connected, right?
Victoria: Absolutely.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: And it's trying to at least acknowledging that, right?
The And so I think that will, as you said, will also transform the positions
of the future as these more of kind of the breaking down the silos, I think happens.
Victoria: Yeah, absolutely.
And so at The Chemical Summit last year, you made a statement along the lines, and
I'm probably paraphrasing a bit, that most natural disasters are related to water,
either too much of it or too little of it.
Can you elaborate on that?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Sure.
Yeah.
No.
And this is where climate comes in, right?
From climate, right?
Impacts.
is then I won't go in deep on the hydrological cycle or that because that'll
probably take a 20 hour show maybe.
But the impacts from climate then are seen then either scarcity
to little water in many places.
Or too much water in terms of floods.
And so this is, we're seeing more and more of that and it does vary, some
regions of the globe where you've seen scarcity for periods of time.
Now we're seeing lots of water, and other areas that have had,
flooding on an ongoing basis now are experienced scarcity.
So it doesn't mean that it's always, exactly cookie cutter approach
either, but it is the climate.
Impacts are felt in water either too much or too little.
And this is where I think we're going to be seeing more of that as well.
But understanding that it does vary over time and regions.
And it's really trying to be adaptive to that as that becomes more frequent.
Victoria: Yeah.
And is there something that we do to influence it other
than continuing to work on our sustainability and climate measures?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: I think so.
One of the things actually I will say that also really attracted
me to ACC was actually the proactive approach on water issues.
So ACC we've been working with our members to look at water stewardship and water
risks because water is a shared resource.
It's not one of those things where you can look in your own kind of
For walls and say, okay, this is the only thing I'm focused on.
And so has been working with our members and we also have a partner, the water
council we've been working with to support our members and looking at water risks
proactively, to do an assessment, look at your water risks and then develop.
Mitigation approaches to address those risks through
a water body risk assessment.
So it's a step by step process.
And what it does, I think, too, especially, is it helps our
members also start engage with stakeholders in the watershed.
Because again, water is a shared resource.
And so it really depends on engaging with those other actors, those stakeholders,
like water utilities, for example and other organizations in a watershed
to understand where First, at a very basic level, because again, I know this
is not a whole show on water, but it really first understanding what are
those future demands for water, right?
We've had our members looking, for example, in watersheds where,
there's a lot of urban growth.
So you're going to have a lot more demand for water as those urban areas grow.
And so how do the utilities manage that where there's already existing
industry or there's also an industry that wants to grow, for example.
Or you have agriculture, right?
There and agriculture actually uses, considerable amount of water.
So how do you manage all of those demands and plan in a way that it, addresses
that and also creates mitigation plans in cases where they might be, too
little water or too much water as well.
So we've been working actively with our members on that.
We're all actively working on support.
Our members also had to engage with stakeholders in the watersheds.
Understanding that, does require time and effort as well in terms
of engaging with stakeholders.
But it's really important if we're trying to really look at those water
risks and some places, our members may not have a high level of risk.
But it is at least saying, okay, in the future that could
change and to be ready for that.
Victoria: Yeah, makes a lot of sense.
In fact for the long time, really, when I thought about water issues
for the chemical industry, and first, certainly for my own personal
experience working in manufacturing, working in big businesses it was
really around the cleanliness, right?
The environmental characteristics, making sure that we were You know,
if we're taking water out of the river, we're putting very clean
water back into the river, et cetera.
So this whole issue of too much, too little thinking about watersheds I know
it's always probably been there but it's certainly becoming a bigger focus area.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Yeah.
And I should say you, you touched on a really good point
in terms of drinking water.
This is also, I overlooked this because it's the foundation of chemistry is
making sure that we have drinkable water.
It's like we always take it, it's just for granted, like it's thanks to
chemistry that we have drinkable water.
And, but at the same time, as I said, these other water risks are
maybe growing in the regions is how to engage with stakeholders.
But thank you for my, yes, absolutely.
Absolutely.
The foundation of having drinkable water is thanks to the chemistry.
Victoria: Absolutely.
Yeah, absolutely.
It's a good, it's a good reminder for all of us.
And I had the opportunity to go to the Hoover Dam last week.
So that was the first time ever we were my kids had spring break.
So we took a vacation out to Vegas and did a mixture of nature
and neon, as I like to call it.
And first time visiting the Hoover Dam, which was fascinating because one I hadn't
appreciated is we've already talked about just the collaboration and the patience
and the ingenuity to get to that point.
And frankly, the patience, right?
The patience,
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: it comes back to that.
Victoria: It took a long time to get that.
And yet it is considered, it's certainly foundational for power
in in the Western part of the U.
S.
And also what I guess I had not fully appreciated and then I thought
about it, Oh yeah, this makes sense.
Part of the reason they did this was of course, terrible flooding in the
Colorado river that persisted over, probably hundreds of years would
be my guess or thousands of years.
And so being able to channel that water effectively to create power,
to control the downstream, et cetera.
And of course it created Lake Mead, which now is at all time lows.
So we've gone from, it was.
the dam and Lake Mead and that entire infrastructure was creating during
a period of abundance of water.
And now there's certainly a shortage and we've turned to
more of a scarcity of water.
And, there's probably a lot of reasons behind that, both climate, use, et cetera.
So it's it was really, It was cool.
I think my kids even thought it was cool.
Even though people say, don't, don't assume your kids are going to like it.
We all liked it and the views are good, but the science behind
it was really cool as well.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Oh, good.
Yeah.
And again, there, as you said, this was developed, period of
time where, water availability was different and it's changed now.
And again, that's again where, that collaboration
remains still central, right?
To address as that is the shifting climate, what that means in terms of
the region and reduced water levels.
And absolutely that collaboration is still critical going forward.
. Victoria: So Karin, we're in women's history month as we're recording this.
So I feel like I want to add this, ask this question of you as a woman
who has really been successful in an international career At a time where
perhaps women weren't as successful as certainly in the early days in
international roles and you've worked with a lot of companies and individuals
and governments around the globe.
What's been significant?
What's the secret of success?
What surprised you?
What advice would you have maybe in terms of that?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: What a good question.
Especially in this month, I, again again, I think I keep coming back
to that patience honestly I remember actually, I was in the world summit
on sustainable development in 2002 and I was on all these panels and
it was all panels of men and me.
There was one panel, it was 10 of us and nine men and me.
Victoria: They were probably older than you, right?
So you were young and a young female
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Much,
Victoria: panels with esteemed colleagues and peers.
Yeah.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: were all, incredible professionals
in their careers, engineers.
Incredible.
And, but yes, I was the lone woman there.
And I would say for me was again, having that patience,
but also perseverance, right.
of, you know, I, Feeling that you know what you know, right?
And there's a lot that I don't know.
Obviously dates.
I'm terrible with dates.
Victoria: Keep that in mind.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: But there's a big understanding what you know
and what you don't know and then having the passion for it, right?
That's what I saw certainly in the World Summit on Sustainable
Development through that whole process.
Actually, it was a colleague of mine.
We brought water because water was missing in the agenda and
we had a passion about water.
Addressing water issues, even though I was working more
broadly on environmental issues.
And we were committed saying, you know what?
Water needs to be here in the agenda.
We're going to fight for it.
And I remember the first time in that process, we got two paragraphs on water.
But there had been zero before, right?
So even that was a success.
So I would say it is really combination of that patience and passion.
I would say it's the peas, right?
Patience.
Perseverance and passion,
Victoria: There's a lot of life lessons there that we can all remember, right?
That's probably a good model.
Patience, perseverance, and passion.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: And I would say the other is, just to know
that it is always changing, right?
The world is changing, right?
In terms of now you see the number of women in different roles is incredible.
In, as chief sustainability officers or, even as CEOs and so
forth it's definitely evolving.
And so it is, it's definitely evolving, but it is, you know,
those would be my three P's I
Victoria: yeah, I'm going to, I think that's right.
And I would reflect on the same.
Similarly for me, I like the perseverance piece, right?
So I many times I was the only woman presenting in a room in a senior
leadership meeting in what have you.
And I was really fortunate.
I spent a big part of my career at Shell and there was, Shell's done a great job.
job of advocating, developing and promoting women.
So I'd never felt always truly like the only, but you'd be the only in the moment.
And I would recognize it, but I'd be like, okay, here we go.
It doesn't stop you.
It's that perseverance piece.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Yeah,
Victoria: think there's always it's, it's hard to get certainly when
we think about in technical roles, like as engineers and scientists
and STEM roles, if you're graduating 25 percent women in those fields.
You're never going to get 50 percent women in engineering if the pool
that you're pulling from is 25%.
So there's this aspect of it is changing, but it's only can change to the extent
that the feeder pool changes as well.
And so I think we have to continue to develop that and promote and encourage it.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Absolutely.
Yeah.
No, and I, that's one of the things too, also ACC, if many may not realize, we
have the Future STEM Scholars Initiative, FOSSI, which is providing support for
students at historically black colleges and universities to study for four years
with the idea that, they would come out as chemical engineers, but also it's
not just the support for the studies, but also mentorship and so forth.
And that, I think that's what I'm thrilled to see ACC doing because, it's
one of those things when we look at these issues, it's not just a matter
of providing financial resources.
It is that mentorship, right?
If I look back, even in my own career, there are people that I
would often go back to, especially as, a woman in the field of Oh, I
just need a little bit of support here of am I doing the right thing?
Am I, you come to crossroads in your life, like I knew I had a
few in my life where I was like, should I go that way or that way?
And I'd go back for some, you know, just talk to some more senior people who
I respected and who would give me the time of day to talk to and knowing that
I was still very early in my career.
And this is with FOSSI is including that mentorship, I think, is
incredible and fabulous because that's just as important as the
resources to be able to do the studies
Victoria: Absolutely.
I think we sometimes take it for granted.
Certainly, my kids, your kids, if you have any, if we have the advantage
of having parents that can coach and mentor and encourage, and yet many
people don't, I certainly, I look back, my parents, they did encourage,
they were great encouragers, but they didn't have direct experience
and couldn't mentor in the same way.
And so having third party mentors whether via FOSSI in a program like that, whether
at your company is so critical to have examples that you can look at people that
can support you, that can engage with you and help you talk through those options,
see what the paths may be, provide that mentorship is really important.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: is really important.
Yeah, it's funny you say that because my parents, we were immigrants,
so neither of my parents spoke English when we came to the U.
S., so wouldn't say they were really, I thank them for everything
they did, but, in terms of kind of that pure mentorship, no.
but it's funny, I do have one child and maybe, I don't
know, I maybe over mentored.
Maybe that's the problem now.
Victoria: That is a challenge and, maybe I'll mentor your kid your child and you
can mentor mine because they don't always like to listen to mom and dad anyway.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Exactly.
Exactly.
Victoria: Awesome.
So Karin, what's on the horizon for the rest of 24?
We're here at the end of the first quarter.
What should we be looking forward to as it relates to ACC and sustainability as
we look ahead for the rest of the year?
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: I would say, in the areas that I described early
on first, we're keep advancing those because again, it is keep putting that
foot forward, especially on climate.
Driving the innovations and the advancements and the different
technologies I think is really important and something that we're focusing on ACC.
How can we drive?
As I mentioned, a strong U.
S.
Chemical manufacturing sector is central.
And so that really for us in 2024 and beyond and making sure that our members.
At all the different whatever size they may be small, medium or large
are able to take their strengths and contribute in a way for that strong U.
S.
chemical manufacturing sector where in a rapidly sustainability
evolving area as well as these areas that are rapidly evolving.
So it's really making sure that we're here to serve our members to
be as best informed as well prepared for the future that they can be.
Victoria: Awesome.
Thank you, Karin.
This has been a great conversation.
I've really enjoyed it.
Thanks for joining us today on The Chemical Show.
karin_1_03-18-2024_130644: Thank you for having me.
Victoria: Absolutely.
And thank you everyone for listening.
Keep listening, keep following, keep sharing, and we'll talk to you again soon.
voiceover: We've come to the end of today's podcast.
We hope you enjoyed your time with us and want to learn more.
Simply visit thechemicalshow.
com for additional information and helpful resources.
Join us again next time here on The Chemical Show with Victoria Meyer.