WEBVTT

NOTE
This file was generated by Descript 

00:01:39.190 --> 00:01:39.450
Duke: all right.

00:01:39.450 --> 00:01:40.540
Corey, what are we talking about today?

00:01:41.055 --> 00:01:41.695
CJ: Duke today.

00:01:41.695 --> 00:01:43.695
We're talking about making
friends with your users.

00:01:44.280 --> 00:01:45.140
Duke: That's right.

00:01:45.200 --> 00:01:49.060
, we thought about this one because we
had both noticed, over our past few

00:01:49.080 --> 00:01:54.420
customers that sometimes you have these
paradigms where the ServiceNow team is

00:01:54.420 --> 00:01:59.615
its own silo and Maybe they're popular,
maybe they're not, but they, but there's

00:01:59.615 --> 00:02:04.485
no really good communication with the
stakeholders, either the people in the

00:02:04.485 --> 00:02:08.705
business that consume the services on
service now, or the people who are in

00:02:08.705 --> 00:02:10.475
charge of delivering those services.

00:02:10.755 --> 00:02:13.845
And so you come in and maybe
you're a freelance architect.

00:02:13.845 --> 00:02:16.795
It's like, we have all these things
we need to improve and all these

00:02:16.795 --> 00:02:19.825
things that people don't like
about the current situation and

00:02:20.175 --> 00:02:22.355
go, go, go build, build, build.

00:02:23.295 --> 00:02:28.905
But yet the organization still acts
like nothing's changing, right?

00:02:29.135 --> 00:02:34.355
And so this is all about how do
you formally build channels of

00:02:34.355 --> 00:02:37.895
communication with the people
who are using your product?

00:02:37.945 --> 00:02:38.315
, CJ: yeah.

00:02:38.315 --> 00:02:41.975
, all of that Duke and there's so
many, tendrils, ? To this one that,

00:02:42.075 --> 00:02:45.655
it goes deep and wide, cause the
first thing that comes to my mind is.

00:02:45.805 --> 00:02:50.175
, the lack of this for most it organizations
is one of the causes of shadow it.

00:02:50.955 --> 00:02:53.875
Not being able to communicate with
your user community, understand

00:02:53.875 --> 00:02:56.385
what their actual needs are so
that you can provide for them.

00:02:56.885 --> 00:02:59.655
Um, you know, uh, one of the other
causes is that, and not actually

00:02:59.655 --> 00:03:02.055
listening to them when they talk to
you, but that's a different episode.

00:03:03.205 --> 00:03:07.925
, Duke: I think people's instincts are
that everything has to be in the tool.

00:03:08.005 --> 00:03:10.355
So a bunch of people are making requests.

00:03:10.555 --> 00:03:14.055
There's the rhythm, there's the
project, there's the incident, whatever.

00:03:14.315 --> 00:03:20.455
And we chat with them through that
interface, or we email them, or every

00:03:20.455 --> 00:03:23.305
once in a while, we have a meeting with.

00:03:23.550 --> 00:03:30.100
Some kind of VP level directorship,
but it can be so much better

00:03:30.180 --> 00:03:33.690
with way more open channels.

00:03:34.795 --> 00:03:35.155
CJ: Yeah.

00:03:35.255 --> 00:03:38.145
And my last company, they
did this, , very well.

00:03:38.155 --> 00:03:40.745
So it was an internal app and
there was a group of folks that

00:03:40.745 --> 00:03:42.445
they identified  power users.

00:03:42.445 --> 00:03:45.215
You want to call them folks of influence,
whatever you want to call them.

00:03:45.215 --> 00:03:49.915
. And so they had this group of folks, they
call them app champions, and they were the

00:03:49.915 --> 00:03:52.245
folks who got the constant communication.

00:03:52.575 --> 00:03:54.425
They got to see the early builds.

00:03:54.615 --> 00:03:57.295
They got to influence the
development direction.

00:03:57.575 --> 00:03:59.165
They were the folks who were.

00:03:59.360 --> 00:04:02.870
, talking to their, coworkers and telling
them about the things that are coming

00:04:02.870 --> 00:04:06.570
up next and how good it was going
to be, or maybe how bad it was going

00:04:06.570 --> 00:04:08.230
to be or , , what have you right?

00:04:08.230 --> 00:04:10.920
But it was, , a formalized group
of folks , who were basically

00:04:10.920 --> 00:04:12.130
blessed by their management.

00:04:13.000 --> 00:04:18.550
, in this council, to discuss the app and to
talk about the app and the direction of it

00:04:18.850 --> 00:04:22.830
and to ensure that, there was an alignment
between development and business.

00:04:23.685 --> 00:04:27.455
Duke: And, , what's your
experience with setting them up?

00:04:28.705 --> 00:04:29.675
Have you ever set one up?

00:04:30.910 --> 00:04:33.450
CJ: Not formally and not in this way.

00:04:33.450 --> 00:04:36.340
No, and definitely , not
at scale like that either.

00:04:36.520 --> 00:04:39.770
But I think we all have to
a certain degree, right?

00:04:39.770 --> 00:04:42.490
Most of us who've been in this space
as long as you and I have Duke,

00:04:42.760 --> 00:04:46.390
?
Like we've set up a cab, ?  And that's
a sort of similar thing, ? You're

00:04:46.390 --> 00:04:51.000
going out, you grabbing folks who
are, , party to this process and

00:04:51.010 --> 00:04:53.250
getting them together and then help it.

00:04:53.250 --> 00:04:55.660
And then they're helping make
decisions , on a process.

00:04:55.660 --> 00:04:55.700
Yeah.

00:04:55.980 --> 00:04:58.330
, cause I don't know about your
experience, but my experience, the

00:04:58.330 --> 00:05:03.080
cap didn't only, meet to, discuss
changes they met to actually discuss

00:05:03.080 --> 00:05:04.680
the direction of change management.

00:05:04.755 --> 00:05:07.010
Right?

00:05:07.290 --> 00:05:10.820
Duke: I've done it a bunch of times and
it's definitively easier when you're the

00:05:10.820 --> 00:05:14.790
person on the inside, when I've tried to
set it up being a freelance architect,

00:05:14.790 --> 00:05:18.170
and you don't have any political sway
it's not that you can compel , your

00:05:18.170 --> 00:05:20.150
handlers  to move in a certain direction.

00:05:20.200 --> 00:05:24.310
? And so you're more like, you
have to put a lot of emphasis

00:05:24.330 --> 00:05:26.860
into the ask and how it's asked.

00:05:27.420 --> 00:05:29.510
So that they understand
the criticality of it.

00:05:29.510 --> 00:05:33.920
But when is your app and you're the
product owner in your company, it's

00:05:33.930 --> 00:05:37.600
way easier just to reach out to  either
the people who complain the loudest,

00:05:37.660 --> 00:05:43.490
.
Or the people , who love it and, , are
bought in , and bring them close, um,

00:05:45.075 --> 00:05:46.375
We didn't organize this very well.

00:05:46.375 --> 00:05:48.695
So we're just trying to figure
this stuff out, the haphazard.

00:05:49.605 --> 00:05:49.825
CJ: Yeah.

00:05:49.825 --> 00:05:52.805
Let me push back on that actually
a little bit Duke, because  I don't

00:05:52.805 --> 00:05:54.465
know what the correct percentage is.

00:05:54.465 --> 00:05:57.575
. But I think there are some cases
where being the outsider actually

00:05:57.575 --> 00:05:59.005
helps you organize that easier.

00:05:59.405 --> 00:06:02.215
. There are some cases where internal
it isn't necessarily trusted

00:06:02.215 --> 00:06:03.445
by the business at this moment.

00:06:03.445 --> 00:06:07.055
And so them trying to reach out and
get together, a user stakeholder group,

00:06:07.315 --> 00:06:11.645
? Might not  be met with a whole lot
of, , optimism or excitement, but if

00:06:11.655 --> 00:06:13.985
you bring in someone with credentials,

00:06:14.185 --> 00:06:16.535
?
Like you and I have and then we say.

00:06:16.910 --> 00:06:18.790
Hey, you know, what would be really cool?

00:06:19.520 --> 00:06:24.140
How about we put together this
stakeholder group comprised of users.

00:06:24.460 --> 00:06:27.690
And let's make sure we identify
the folks who are both love the

00:06:27.690 --> 00:06:30.530
system and don't love it as much.

00:06:30.910 --> 00:06:34.200
And let's get everyone together
and let's have some conversations.

00:06:34.480 --> 00:06:38.430
And because we have the gravitas  and
the experience and the work and the

00:06:38.440 --> 00:06:42.820
titles and certifications and all that
kind of stuff, and we're an independent.

00:06:43.035 --> 00:06:46.225
, entity outside of the
normal it infrastructure.

00:06:47.035 --> 00:06:51.025
We sometimes can compel the business
to come together and think, well,

00:06:51.155 --> 00:06:52.405
this time it might be different.

00:06:52.860 --> 00:06:55.830
Duke: Oh, you know what
else we're disposable,

00:06:56.565 --> 00:06:57.425
CJ: That too.

00:06:57.820 --> 00:07:00.560
Duke: So it's kind of like, I've been
in situations where the stakeholders

00:07:00.560 --> 00:07:03.610
are kind of afraid of the rest of
the organization, ?  They're not

00:07:03.610 --> 00:07:05.500
well liked and  Oh, well, yeah.

00:07:05.510 --> 00:07:09.950
I don't know how to sway them , or I
don't want to commit to anything or

00:07:09.950 --> 00:07:11.720
be perceived to commit to anything.

00:07:12.390 --> 00:07:15.000
And then get, , punched down
later when I don't deliver.

00:07:15.320 --> 00:07:18.470
In those situations, it's easy for
somebody like us to say, , let me do it.

00:07:18.730 --> 00:07:19.960
I'm comfortable in a room.

00:07:20.200 --> 00:07:24.140
I'm used to dealing with hostile
stakeholders and I could put a smiley

00:07:24.140 --> 00:07:28.670
happy face on and if I still can't do
it, you could be like, yeah, that Fedora

00:07:28.680 --> 00:07:31.860
guy, we never should have , let her never
should have let him out of the kennel.

00:07:31.970 --> 00:07:33.250
, we won't make that mistake again.

00:07:35.575 --> 00:07:38.845
, CJ: and then they can commiserate right
over , how horrible you were, right.

00:07:39.835 --> 00:07:40.905
You know, and, and they can,

00:07:41.070 --> 00:07:42.690
Duke: That's one thing
you have in common now.

00:07:43.045 --> 00:07:43.675
CJ: Right.

00:07:43.955 --> 00:07:46.095
And they can use that
to come together, right.

00:07:46.095 --> 00:07:48.165
Whatever works ultimately
at the end of the day.

00:07:48.165 --> 00:07:51.875
, I'd love it if my clients didn't have
to fire me in order to, uh, to, you

00:07:51.875 --> 00:07:53.405
know, get movement on the project.

00:07:53.405 --> 00:07:53.695
Right.

00:07:53.695 --> 00:07:53.985
But

00:07:57.260 --> 00:08:01.400
Duke: Oh man, it would not be funny, but
it's getting just fun to laugh at now.

00:08:01.865 --> 00:08:02.305
CJ: right.

00:08:02.575 --> 00:08:06.815
But maybe if they come back, if they fired
me to get movement, reach out and say,

00:08:06.815 --> 00:08:10.375
Hey, here's a bonus because actually,
we all hated you, but that, that was

00:08:10.375 --> 00:08:11.735
the best thing that ever happened to us.

00:08:11.735 --> 00:08:12.335
It was like, that's great.

00:08:14.520 --> 00:08:19.140
Duke: So I would like to talk about one of
my experiences with this too if you are,

00:08:19.240 --> 00:08:22.880
, a ServiceNow product owner who really
feels the pressure from the rest of the

00:08:22.880 --> 00:08:26.210
organization, let's just leave the idea
of , do they like the experience or not?

00:08:26.220 --> 00:08:27.420
But let's say they want more.

00:08:27.430 --> 00:08:31.230
Everybody wants stuff improved,
stuff built, whatever.

00:08:31.300 --> 00:08:34.850
So if you're feeling like you're
under pressure and you don't have a

00:08:35.390 --> 00:08:40.010
Stakeholder council get one because
I have found it's the easiest way

00:08:40.010 --> 00:08:41.990
to show the organization that.

00:08:42.775 --> 00:08:44.795
It's not them versus you.

00:08:44.805 --> 00:08:47.265
Like why, how come you
aren't getting my stuff done?

00:08:48.145 --> 00:08:52.255
? It completely diffuses that tension
because people will see that it's

00:08:52.255 --> 00:08:57.175
not them versus you, the product
owner, it's them versus the weight

00:08:57.215 --> 00:09:01.505
of the rest of the organization that
also wants ServiceNow stuff done.

00:09:01.505 --> 00:09:06.840
They don't have any way of seeing
that, Bob wants cleaner notifications,

00:09:06.860 --> 00:09:12.490
but meanwhile, Jane is responsible
for, , getting asset management up

00:09:12.490 --> 00:09:15.090
and running and there's millions
of dollars at stake with this.

00:09:15.310 --> 00:09:17.910
. And so now people can see
their own requests in the

00:09:17.910 --> 00:09:19.400
context of the bigger picture.

00:09:20.190 --> 00:09:21.320
CJ: That's a really good point.

00:09:21.340 --> 00:09:25.020
And honestly, this is something where,
, my nighttime job, ? It really comes

00:09:25.020 --> 00:09:28.450
in handy and it's really useful and we
don't do it well, enough there either.

00:09:28.470 --> 00:09:28.710
Right.

00:09:28.710 --> 00:09:32.120
But  in that context, I talk
about it as transparency,   what

00:09:32.920 --> 00:09:34.130
demands are in the queue.

00:09:34.520 --> 00:09:36.560
And what's the priority of those demands?

00:09:37.120 --> 00:09:37.400
Right.

00:09:37.400 --> 00:09:41.990
What's our level of resources and why are
these things getting done before others?

00:09:42.210 --> 00:09:42.490
Right.

00:09:42.490 --> 00:09:42.730
Like,

00:09:43.910 --> 00:09:45.950
Duke: Well like just on that point too.

00:09:45.970 --> 00:09:52.380
I think so many people say transparency
But what they imagine is i'm comfortable

00:09:52.380 --> 00:09:58.110
showing you the performance on my
tickets Even if it's bad,  which is

00:09:58.120 --> 00:10:03.660
noble but , not big enough thinking
because part of transparency is

00:10:03.820 --> 00:10:06.360
what can we do with this app?

00:10:06.520 --> 00:10:10.900
What are we under utilizing
that we've bought?

00:10:11.990 --> 00:10:14.810
How many people have performance
analytics just sitting there, right?

00:10:15.385 --> 00:10:16.405
CJ: Hey everybody.

00:10:16.560 --> 00:10:19.610
Duke: Just sitting there, just like part
of transparency is getting people together

00:10:19.610 --> 00:10:25.300
and say like, Hey, we have this tool that
can really drive process performance.

00:10:25.800 --> 00:10:29.560
Or all the people that just didn't have
a good strategy for catalog right out the

00:10:29.560 --> 00:10:34.230
gate or for all those companies who have
suffered major mergers and acquisitions.

00:10:34.230 --> 00:10:38.210
And so you got three different ways
to order the same SharePoint request.

00:10:38.220 --> 00:10:40.170
Cause it's three different
companies that used to do it.

00:10:40.500 --> 00:10:40.810
Right.

00:10:40.860 --> 00:10:44.790
Like, like how else are you supposed
to bring that  to the table?

00:10:44.790 --> 00:10:49.460
And it's a place to put
your vision in place.

00:10:49.835 --> 00:10:52.805
A lot of companies will be like,
Oh, make sure you show us a roadmap.

00:10:52.805 --> 00:10:54.965
And sometimes what they mean is we're
going to tell you a whole bunch of

00:10:54.965 --> 00:10:58.665
stuff and you put it in the single
file that is most appealing to us.

00:10:59.175 --> 00:11:05.225
But as a seasoned ServiceNow resource,
you're certain to have ideas to improve

00:11:05.225 --> 00:11:10.210
the platform, utilize more of the platform
that nobody will ever ask you for.

00:11:10.720 --> 00:11:11.200
CJ: Yeah,

00:11:11.650 --> 00:11:13.330
Duke: But how do you get
that stuff out in front?

00:11:14.510 --> 00:11:17.240
, CJ: yeah, again, , I think this
stakeholder council idea is a

00:11:17.250 --> 00:11:22.450
great ability to showcase from both
ends, right, is the user community,

00:11:22.660 --> 00:11:26.990
showcasing, hey, these are the
troubles that we have and  this is

00:11:27.010 --> 00:11:28.970
how we rate those troubles on our end.

00:11:29.300 --> 00:11:32.590
, and we want to be involved in
helping  us fix them right now.

00:11:32.590 --> 00:11:36.080
We don't want you to just go away in a
black box and come back and say, hey.

00:11:36.330 --> 00:11:39.670
We took three sentences from you
and we built a solution, right?

00:11:39.670 --> 00:11:43.400
Like we want to actually have
some, skin in the game, help it

00:11:43.400 --> 00:11:45.020
identify the actual solution.

00:11:45.020 --> 00:11:47.710
And I did, and then you'll
get into your point, right?

00:11:47.710 --> 00:11:49.160
Like  allowing you to tell us.

00:11:49.210 --> 00:11:53.070
What else you could possibly do or how
you could possibly solve this in a way

00:11:53.310 --> 00:11:55.080
and then going having that back and forth?

00:11:55.080 --> 00:11:56.920
Because now we we're
starting to understand the

00:11:56.920 --> 00:11:58.090
platform a little bit better.

00:11:58.530 --> 00:12:03.040
Now we can ask for more and we can
ask for better or we can contextualize

00:12:03.050 --> 00:12:06.440
our problem more because we can
be confident that a solution out

00:12:06.450 --> 00:12:07.880
there potentially exists for it.

00:12:08.490 --> 00:12:08.800
Right?

00:12:08.800 --> 00:12:13.500
And then as the  product owner, you
and you're the folks on your team

00:12:13.820 --> 00:12:18.690
have this place where you can bring
a little bit more of that knowledge,

00:12:18.690 --> 00:12:22.270
as a developer, you maybe you don't
necessarily get to exhibit that.

00:12:22.525 --> 00:12:24.245
In those internal meetings as much, right?

00:12:24.245 --> 00:12:25.785
Like you get a story assigned to you work.

00:12:25.785 --> 00:12:26.255
It is done.

00:12:26.255 --> 00:12:27.035
It's a great story.

00:12:27.035 --> 00:12:27.435
You done it.

00:12:27.625 --> 00:12:28.765
Did it really well, right?

00:12:28.765 --> 00:12:29.485
Like you get kudos.

00:12:29.485 --> 00:12:33.035
Hey, yeah, that was really efficient,
but you might also have thoughts on

00:12:33.035 --> 00:12:36.885
how you can solve a complex problem
because you that's all that's a skill

00:12:36.885 --> 00:12:38.715
set that you don't get to show too often.

00:12:38.715 --> 00:12:40.175
But in the stakeholder council, right?

00:12:40.505 --> 00:12:42.765
When you're having this open
communication, maybe that's the

00:12:42.765 --> 00:12:44.075
sort of thing that bubbles up to.

00:12:44.075 --> 00:12:46.785
Oh,

00:12:47.220 --> 00:12:48.990
, Duke: there's one other element
I want to bring to this.

00:12:49.570 --> 00:12:52.390
Because, if one's good, why not two?

00:12:53.250 --> 00:12:58.630
Um, and I think you'll
very rapidly get into this.

00:12:59.390 --> 00:13:03.350
Case 2 and so I would be
prepared to have 2 councils.

00:13:03.480 --> 00:13:03.760
Okay.

00:13:03.760 --> 00:13:08.310
1 would be a council assembled of
people who are in there every day.

00:13:09.170 --> 00:13:11.370
? Get me a frontline service desk person.

00:13:11.470 --> 00:13:16.050
Convince the service manager to give you
somebody like an hour a week or something.

00:13:17.100 --> 00:13:20.680
But the people that actually work on
the thing, because there's going to

00:13:20.680 --> 00:13:24.280
be  lots of Intel they can give you,
but then the second stakeholder council

00:13:24.280 --> 00:13:26.870
is more like the VP level of the org.

00:13:27.640 --> 00:13:28.180
You know what I mean?

00:13:28.180 --> 00:13:29.750
So you could talk  big picture stuff.

00:13:29.750 --> 00:13:31.550
Like what can the CMDB do for all of us?

00:13:32.730 --> 00:13:36.770
Versus the  more in the trenches
people be like, well, it sucks that

00:13:36.770 --> 00:13:38.930
all these tasks go to the wrong places.

00:13:40.420 --> 00:13:41.200
CJ: Yeah,

00:13:41.410 --> 00:13:44.040
Duke: And  it's the same
conversation kind of CMDB.

00:13:44.050 --> 00:13:44.800
How can it help you?

00:13:45.680 --> 00:13:49.060
But it's from a different angle,
a different facet on the gem.

00:13:49.060 --> 00:13:50.120
Yeah.

00:13:50.290 --> 00:13:51.420
CJ: I get exactly what you're saying.

00:13:51.420 --> 00:13:51.970
what you're talking about?

00:13:52.010 --> 00:13:52.340
Really?

00:13:52.340 --> 00:13:56.610
It's like an executive  stakeholder
council as well as a champion

00:13:56.610 --> 00:13:59.620
council, which is a level below
that a little bit more,  people

00:13:59.630 --> 00:14:00.970
with boots on the ground, right?

00:14:00.970 --> 00:14:02.260
Who are actually doing the work.

00:14:02.490 --> 00:14:04.370
And utilizing the system day to day.

00:14:04.370 --> 00:14:07.670
. So they could give a little bit more
tactical feedback , and tactical ideas

00:14:07.670 --> 00:14:10.500
where at the executive level right
now, we're talking about aligning the

00:14:10.500 --> 00:14:12.310
platform with the business outcomes.

00:14:12.360 --> 00:14:16.260
And I'll tell you like it's three things,
that people buy service now for, and

00:14:16.260 --> 00:14:22.190
, it is to make money is to save money
or is to decrease slash manage risk.

00:14:23.230 --> 00:14:26.440
And so when you're talking at that
executive level, , the platform's

00:14:26.460 --> 00:14:29.140
going to start to align with one
of those three buckets, right?

00:14:29.160 --> 00:14:29.880
Or it should.

00:14:29.900 --> 00:14:32.810
And if it's not, that's where you
want to steer the conversation.

00:14:33.060 --> 00:14:37.310
And then, as you start to align, those
potential, , project implementations with

00:14:37.320 --> 00:14:42.020
those buckets, then that starts to shower
down to that next level of stakeholder

00:14:42.020 --> 00:14:45.680
council where now we're talking about,
, why are all these tasks going this place?

00:14:46.255 --> 00:14:48.775
Maybe the question is, why
do we even have these tasks?

00:14:49.155 --> 00:14:49.395
Right?

00:14:49.395 --> 00:14:50.085
Who's using them?

00:14:50.085 --> 00:14:51.225
What are we using them for?

00:14:51.645 --> 00:14:52.125
Right.

00:14:52.125 --> 00:14:52.395
You know,

00:14:52.720 --> 00:14:57.540
, Duke: you definitely get to, , deburr the
tool when you, when you, when you talk to

00:14:57.540 --> 00:14:59.090
the people who actually use it every day.

00:14:59.480 --> 00:15:01.010
You just find out where the stuff is.

00:15:01.030 --> 00:15:05.850
But , where I've seen this most recently
is that , the front liners have way

00:15:05.850 --> 00:15:07.600
more to say straight out the gate.

00:15:08.210 --> 00:15:14.590
And in contrast, the VP council, which I
thought for sure would be the most, , not

00:15:14.590 --> 00:15:15.720
contentious, but you know what I mean?

00:15:15.720 --> 00:15:19.350
They'd have more critical things to say
, and they'll want more out of the app.

00:15:19.360 --> 00:15:22.590
But they were saying things
like, we don't even know what

00:15:22.590 --> 00:15:24.520
capabilities are available to us.

00:15:24.535 --> 00:15:28.625
What a golden opportunity to be a
service now, anything and you're, and

00:15:28.635 --> 00:15:31.335
VP level stakeholders are like, you
know what, we don't even know this tool

00:15:31.335 --> 00:15:32.865
well enough to know what to ask for.

00:15:33.205 --> 00:15:33.775
Wow.

00:15:33.965 --> 00:15:35.165
Am I ever going to make your day?

00:15:38.570 --> 00:15:42.170
CJ: yeah, you know, dude,  that's an
interesting, , position to be in,  because

00:15:42.170 --> 00:15:44.780
the first thing you start thinking
about is, oh, you don't know service.

00:15:44.780 --> 00:15:46.590
Now, let me tell you service now.

00:15:46.810 --> 00:15:48.870
But then there's another way
of thinking about that too.

00:15:49.090 --> 00:15:52.550
It's in that way is I don't
think I know the business enough.

00:15:52.550 --> 00:15:52.610
Yeah.

00:15:53.415 --> 00:15:58.855
and what I mean by that is when a
VP level C suite level check writing

00:15:58.855 --> 00:16:02.895
level person says to you, I don't
know your tool well enough to give

00:16:02.895 --> 00:16:04.295
you direction on how to use it.

00:16:04.555 --> 00:16:09.135
My thought is how do I make the most of
this 15 minutes you're about to give me

00:16:09.415 --> 00:16:14.795
to under, to make you understand that we
need to devote a lot more resources to

00:16:14.795 --> 00:16:19.125
this thing, because it's going to take
whatever you care about and turn it to 10.

00:16:19.980 --> 00:16:20.390
Right.

00:16:20.440 --> 00:16:24.720
So  I got to understand more about
what you care about so that I'm

00:16:24.720 --> 00:16:26.250
not showing you asset management.

00:16:26.490 --> 00:16:27.700
If you care about, , P.

00:16:27.700 --> 00:16:27.920
P.

00:16:27.920 --> 00:16:28.180
M.

00:16:28.625 --> 00:16:29.105
Duke: Yeah.

00:16:29.895 --> 00:16:30.115
Yeah.

00:16:30.170 --> 00:16:31.770
CJ: And that is 1 of those things.

00:16:31.770 --> 00:16:35.740
When you do get that green light that,
we don't know this at well enough

00:16:35.740 --> 00:16:37.470
to even know what it can do for us.

00:16:38.715 --> 00:16:43.565
Ooh, you get the fingers going
like, yeah, but let's make sure

00:16:43.565 --> 00:16:45.125
we we're targeting that too.

00:16:45.135 --> 00:16:45.605
Right.

00:16:46.305 --> 00:16:49.215
Duke: That's why you should always have a
PowerPoint going on with your daydreams.

00:16:50.455 --> 00:16:51.425
How would I sell it?

00:16:51.555 --> 00:16:52.745
Somebody just said, Hey.

00:16:53.445 --> 00:16:56.155
Give me an elevator pitch on what
you do, just pull that thing out.

00:16:56.745 --> 00:16:57.785
I'm glad you asked.

00:16:58.695 --> 00:16:58.985
CJ: Right.

00:16:58.995 --> 00:16:59.275
Right.

00:16:59.275 --> 00:17:01.885
Glad you asked, you know, I've been
working at this company for five

00:17:01.885 --> 00:17:04.395
years and these are the places where
I've seen, we've been falling down.

00:17:04.545 --> 00:17:06.285
This is how service now
can help you in those guys.

00:17:06.545 --> 00:17:06.635
Yeah.

00:17:06.635 --> 00:17:07.565
Boom, boom, boom, boom.

00:17:07.565 --> 00:17:07.975
Right.

00:17:10.035 --> 00:17:12.145
, Duke: I got a couple other
kind of tactical points.

00:17:12.485 --> 00:17:12.855
CJ: go for it.

00:17:13.465 --> 00:17:13.885
Duke: okay.

00:17:13.905 --> 00:17:18.055
So when you're at the VP level,
let's call it the strategic council.

00:17:18.085 --> 00:17:18.515
Okay.

00:17:18.715 --> 00:17:19.055
CJ: Yep.

00:17:20.035 --> 00:17:22.795
Duke: And then the other one, let's
call it the tactical council, right?

00:17:22.795 --> 00:17:23.015
That's

00:17:23.035 --> 00:17:24.695
CJ: I like that strategic versus tactical.

00:17:24.695 --> 00:17:25.145
I like that.

00:17:25.325 --> 00:17:31.125
Duke: Okay, so get this on the tactical
council talk tactics and strategy

00:17:31.425 --> 00:17:35.155
because I think everybody wants to make
the big picture manifest right there.

00:17:35.345 --> 00:17:35.875
Yes.

00:17:35.925 --> 00:17:36.965
I'm buried in stuff.

00:17:36.995 --> 00:17:39.585
No, I don't know what all
these dang FC tasks are.

00:17:39.765 --> 00:17:40.215
Well, what?

00:17:40.215 --> 00:17:43.845
I'm not supposed to work on the rhythm
like, deal with all that stuff, but

00:17:43.845 --> 00:17:46.125
also talk strategy layer with them.

00:17:46.535 --> 00:17:50.785
If we all,  agree to this, this is how the
org gets faster, better, and eventually

00:17:50.785 --> 00:17:52.505
the weight moves off of all of us.

00:17:52.525 --> 00:17:55.405
And people I found respond
really well to that, but at the

00:17:55.405 --> 00:17:57.975
strategic layer only be strategic.

00:17:58.675 --> 00:18:02.045
Cause they'll say stuff
like, , how can we improve UX?

00:18:02.045 --> 00:18:04.225
That was one , on one of my
customers , latest meetings.

00:18:04.255 --> 00:18:07.295
We need to make sure that the customer
experience is very, very good.

00:18:07.525 --> 00:18:14.365
The communication is very, very open
and,  just so, and,  I was helping

00:18:14.365 --> 00:18:19.815
them craft a deck and it was just like,
, here's the 36 Project tasks we have

00:18:19.815 --> 00:18:23.155
in the system to talk about UX and the
things that we might want to do and the

00:18:23.165 --> 00:18:25.005
things that we already, I'm like, no,

00:18:25.435 --> 00:18:25.675
CJ: Yeah.

00:18:25.675 --> 00:18:26.505
None of that matters.

00:18:26.515 --> 00:18:26.785
Duke: yeah.

00:18:26.785 --> 00:18:30.645
Don't don't talk about the 36
things that we are or can do.

00:18:31.170 --> 00:18:32.840
In terms of features, right?

00:18:33.420 --> 00:18:35.960
We're going to turn on notification
digest and we're going to, you

00:18:35.960 --> 00:18:39.830
know, just, no, just like we're
doing a notification overhaul.

00:18:39.840 --> 00:18:40.450
One thing,

00:18:41.175 --> 00:18:41.665
CJ: Right.

00:18:41.690 --> 00:18:45.470
Duke: Make it broad categories and don't
get them in the weeds of the features

00:18:45.490 --> 00:18:48.640
because there's this sense of, um,

00:18:51.080 --> 00:18:54.620
what's, I don't have a good
metaphor for it, but it's kind

00:18:54.620 --> 00:18:57.660
of like, there's a tipping point,
where that person looks busy.

00:18:58.140 --> 00:19:01.960
. And , it looks good in their favor
because they're clearly getting

00:19:01.960 --> 00:19:03.440
stuff done and they're on the ball.

00:19:03.500 --> 00:19:03.840
Right.

00:19:04.550 --> 00:19:08.060
But there's a certain level of detail
about what the work is that they're

00:19:08.070 --> 00:19:11.870
doing and they're busy where it
starts paying negative dividends.

00:19:13.560 --> 00:19:19.150
CJ: Yeah, I think if I'm reading you
right, like it's a, I don't necessarily

00:19:19.150 --> 00:19:24.190
need to know like every percentage of
your 150 percentage points of utilization.

00:19:24.540 --> 00:19:24.850
Right.

00:19:24.850 --> 00:19:29.180
What I need to know is overall,
like how you're moving the needle.

00:19:29.605 --> 00:19:30.105
Duke: Oh, I got it.

00:19:30.155 --> 00:19:30.755
I got the metaphor.

00:19:30.795 --> 00:19:31.415
I got the metaphor.

00:19:31.635 --> 00:19:35.305
Okay, if I tell you, uh, I'm gonna
spend the weekend organizing my house.

00:19:35.305 --> 00:19:36.615
You're kind of like good for you, right?

00:19:37.775 --> 00:19:42.735
But if you saw my house and you saw
that I was a hoarder you'd be like That

00:19:42.735 --> 00:19:44.595
means nothing like you're a hoarder.

00:19:44.645 --> 00:19:45.415
It's hopeless.

00:19:45.415 --> 00:19:50.650
Like this is hopeless at a certain
level of mess It's hopeless.

00:19:50.850 --> 00:19:52.190
So , don't expose that.

00:19:52.200 --> 00:19:55.690
Think like talk strategy
layer only is all I'm saying.

00:19:56.220 --> 00:19:56.810
CJ: I got you.

00:19:56.850 --> 00:19:57.280
I got you.

00:19:57.280 --> 00:19:58.530
Here's the bonus points too.

00:19:58.780 --> 00:19:59.760
, if there's a way.

00:20:00.140 --> 00:20:03.220
To tie those buckets of things
that you're going to like the

00:20:03.230 --> 00:20:06.130
project, the notification project,
we're going to enhance, , internal

00:20:06.130 --> 00:20:09.540
communications by revamping the
notification structure of our service.

00:20:09.550 --> 00:20:09.870
Now.

00:20:10.130 --> 00:20:13.270
If you could map that to
an organizational goal.

00:20:13.630 --> 00:20:15.890
When you're talking to
strategy level, right?

00:20:16.140 --> 00:20:18.550
Then all of a sudden, you've
got a little bit more gravitas

00:20:18.570 --> 00:20:20.250
on the reason for that project.

00:20:20.630 --> 00:20:21.070
Duke: Yeah.

00:20:21.070 --> 00:20:21.950
And this is  another tip.

00:20:21.950 --> 00:20:23.880
Shout out to Kristen Reeves
for giving me this one.

00:20:24.490 --> 00:20:27.950
, if you're going to go to either
council and they express things that

00:20:27.960 --> 00:20:32.020
interest them,  like we don't have
any idea what capabilities we do have.

00:20:32.021 --> 00:20:35.301
when we get to the next council
, when we list stuff out, be sure to

00:20:35.301 --> 00:20:39.181
tell them if there's an initiative
underway and what phase it's in.

00:20:40.491 --> 00:20:41.111
CJ: Oh, yeah.

00:20:41.171 --> 00:20:41.601
Okay.

00:20:41.661 --> 00:20:43.671
, Duke: there's a lot of capabilities
that ServiceNow can do.

00:20:43.711 --> 00:20:44.751
Take the CMDB.

00:20:44.821 --> 00:20:46.671
We're actually in the
middle of a CMDB project.

00:20:46.671 --> 00:20:47.651
We're in the build phase,

00:20:48.291 --> 00:20:48.661
CJ: Right.

00:20:48.891 --> 00:20:49.171
Duke: right?

00:20:49.171 --> 00:20:50.501
We could do asset management.

00:20:50.501 --> 00:20:52.311
We're currently in the
planning phase for that.

00:20:52.901 --> 00:20:53.451
CJ: Right.

00:20:53.651 --> 00:20:57.411
Duke: And , not only does it allow
you the opportunity to say , look at

00:20:57.411 --> 00:21:00.911
all these awesome things that we can
do, but also your forward thinking

00:21:00.911 --> 00:21:03.471
ness about where they're actually at.

00:21:03.481 --> 00:21:05.261
Like, how close are we to achieving that?

00:21:06.421 --> 00:21:10.411
CJ: And then also to allow that
strategy council to weigh in on those

00:21:10.411 --> 00:21:13.611
and say,  of the things that you've
shown me, I think there's heavy,

00:21:13.611 --> 00:21:15.448
, anticipation for project number 2.

00:21:15.748 --> 00:21:18.538
Is there any way we can put a little bit
more resources behind that so that we

00:21:18.538 --> 00:21:21.128
can take it up a priority level, right?

00:21:21.178 --> 00:21:25.138
Allows you to give them that transparency,
that insight into the organization

00:21:25.138 --> 00:21:26.198
and the work that's being done.

00:21:26.408 --> 00:21:28.708
So then they can weigh in on
the priority schedule too.

00:21:29.488 --> 00:21:30.618
Duke: I hear that, yep.

00:21:30.618 --> 00:21:37.068
And, it gives them the option to
right the ship in a way too, right?

00:21:37.068 --> 00:21:37.658
Cause it's,

00:21:37.778 --> 00:21:38.208
CJ: Yeah.

00:21:38.498 --> 00:21:41.523
, Duke: why is this more
important than that?

00:21:42.223 --> 00:21:45.493
All my customers are saying that
nobody ever calls them back..

00:21:45.493 --> 00:21:49.873
And so why is the notification
overhaul taking priority over that?

00:21:49.883 --> 00:21:52.623
Why can't you make people
call my customers back?

00:21:53.338 --> 00:21:53.788
CJ: Yeah.

00:21:53.878 --> 00:21:55.158
I mean, that's a good question too,

00:21:55.323 --> 00:21:57.053
Duke: now we're talking SLA's or whatnot.

00:21:57.103 --> 00:22:00.993
, CJ: or maybe you're talking about
the same projects, but you can answer

00:22:01.003 --> 00:22:05.113
that question with how that project
is going to influence that concern.

00:22:06.568 --> 00:22:06.918
Duke: yeah.

00:22:06.993 --> 00:22:10.683
CJ: don't, you don't get there , if you're
not elevating that project to that level,

00:22:11.233 --> 00:22:13.163
and causing that conversation to happen.

00:22:13.863 --> 00:22:17.153
Ultimately, what it just comes down to
for me, Duke, . Is just communication,

00:22:17.493 --> 00:22:21.903
. It's a winning strategy, , and you
might think you're doing enough,

00:22:21.913 --> 00:22:23.533
you're probably not doing enough.

00:22:23.533 --> 00:22:27.393
If you don't have these stakeholder
councils, you're not doing enough, right?

00:22:27.393 --> 00:22:31.053
Because there's probably communication
, that's hidden from you because you

00:22:31.053 --> 00:22:35.683
don't have the right people  in a room
talking about whatever the thing is

00:22:35.683 --> 00:22:40.003
that needs to be talked about, or just
in the room and having spontaneous

00:22:40.003 --> 00:22:44.343
conversations happen in the course of
those directed conversations too, right?

00:22:44.353 --> 00:22:48.383
It's just more communication that you can
get with around like the governing layer

00:22:48.383 --> 00:22:51.223
of the product, ? The more you can align.

00:22:51.513 --> 00:22:57.013
The product with the overall direction
of the business from top all the way

00:22:57.013 --> 00:23:00.613
down, right from strategic level,
all the way down to the tactical one.

00:23:02.528 --> 00:23:03.878
Duke: that makes me think of something.

00:23:04.248 --> 00:23:10.258
Once you form these things up,  I think be
careful about how labor you give somebody.

00:23:11.008 --> 00:23:15.378
You should always formulate them at the
start as being an invitation, right?

00:23:15.648 --> 00:23:20.108
Like we can talk about ways to
make your life better because one

00:23:20.108 --> 00:23:26.208
thing I think people miss a lot
is that The ServiceNow app in an

00:23:26.218 --> 00:23:29.758
org is not there for its own sake.

00:23:31.108 --> 00:23:32.178
CJ: Ah, yes.

00:23:33.168 --> 00:23:34.008
Duke: You know what I mean?

00:23:34.028 --> 00:23:34.498
Like,

00:23:34.728 --> 00:23:35.288
CJ: I know.

00:23:36.848 --> 00:23:41.668
Duke: so , you have to make it about how
they're going to benefit, not how much

00:23:41.858 --> 00:23:47.128
better it's going to be for the ServiceNow
platform and your team if they just.

00:23:47.488 --> 00:23:48.838
, fill in the blank, whatever,

00:23:49.448 --> 00:23:49.728
CJ: Yep.

00:23:49.728 --> 00:23:50.433
Yeah.

00:23:50.433 --> 00:23:51.138
Right.

00:23:51.388 --> 00:23:53.978
Duke: let, you know, too, because, , I've
been in this situation where there

00:23:53.978 --> 00:23:56.378
was , a performance cleanup, right?

00:23:56.378 --> 00:23:59.748
Senior leadership said, no,
there's way too much old crap.

00:23:59.958 --> 00:24:01.078
There's way too much busted.

00:24:01.738 --> 00:24:04.278
Everybody's got to get in
here and sweep your old crap.

00:24:04.608 --> 00:24:06.758
And the service now team has to lead it.

00:24:07.458 --> 00:24:09.538
In lieu of having other process ownership.

00:24:09.538 --> 00:24:12.648
So it's like the teams are
like, Hey, why do we care about

00:24:12.698 --> 00:24:14.108
making your team look better?

00:24:14.108 --> 00:24:14.298
Right?

00:24:14.328 --> 00:24:15.398
I'm super busy.

00:24:16.068 --> 00:24:16.578
CJ: Right.

00:24:16.948 --> 00:24:20.358
Duke: And so, there's a delicate
communication style that you

00:24:20.358 --> 00:24:24.798
have to let them know that it's
for their benefit, not yours.

00:24:24.798 --> 00:24:29.598
But also be cognizant of the fact that
don't ask them to do things for you.

00:24:29.598 --> 00:24:30.728
Do things for them.

00:24:31.428 --> 00:24:33.438
CJ: That's the philosophy of
making your partners rich.

00:24:33.488 --> 00:24:35.558
, if we use networking as an example.

00:24:36.298 --> 00:24:39.248
. We always say you should network, you
should  get more people in your network.

00:24:39.248 --> 00:24:39.508
Right.

00:24:39.708 --> 00:24:42.298
And most people think, yeah, I
should get more people in my network

00:24:42.488 --> 00:24:44.188
so that they can do stuff for me.

00:24:44.798 --> 00:24:46.598
And that's not how networking works.

00:24:46.963 --> 00:24:50.473
? You get more people in your network
so that you have more people

00:24:50.473 --> 00:24:52.003
who might ask you for stuff.

00:24:52.523 --> 00:24:55.983
And maybe you've got more
chances to deliver favors.

00:24:56.323 --> 00:25:02.263
And as you deliver more favors, you got
more people who look to you as somebody

00:25:02.353 --> 00:25:05.483
who can do things for people and they
start wanting to do things for you.

00:25:06.223 --> 00:25:06.733
Duke: Oh man.

00:25:06.743 --> 00:25:10.133
We've talked about that way earlier , in
CJ and the Duke to like the secret

00:25:10.133 --> 00:25:14.143
economy in the service now world,
where it's kind of like, , I've seen

00:25:14.143 --> 00:25:18.043
Corey publicly help people and Corey's
coming to me with a question, so I'm.

00:25:18.418 --> 00:25:20.078
Paying off or you know what I mean?

00:25:20.078 --> 00:25:20.258
Like

00:25:20.358 --> 00:25:20.858
CJ: Yep.

00:25:21.448 --> 00:25:23.768
Duke: so I'm going to take care
of Corey because Corey takes care

00:25:23.768 --> 00:25:26.688
of people and some of those people
might take care of me and vice versa.

00:25:26.688 --> 00:25:30.978
And yeah, you

00:25:31.178 --> 00:25:32.018
CJ: thing here, right?

00:25:32.018 --> 00:25:35.578
Like, just like you said, you know, it's
not, you know, the work is like, I'm busy.

00:25:35.648 --> 00:25:36.528
I can't do work.

00:25:36.528 --> 00:25:37.478
That's benefiting you.

00:25:37.878 --> 00:25:38.808
Yes, you can.

00:25:40.558 --> 00:25:43.238
Right, because you, if you doing
that work, that's going to benefit

00:25:43.238 --> 00:25:47.468
another group is going to , bring
that bounty back to you in so many

00:25:47.468 --> 00:25:49.028
ways that you can't even anticipate.

00:25:49.643 --> 00:25:53.493
. And, , if everyone is engaging in
these reciprocal actions, , all of a

00:25:53.493 --> 00:25:56.453
sudden a rising tide lifts all ships.

00:25:57.153 --> 00:25:58.423
Hey, that's just how I look at it.

00:25:58.423 --> 00:26:00.983
it's just the reason why  I
try to pick generosity over,

00:26:01.033 --> 00:26:02.453
whatever the opposite of it is.

00:26:04.798 --> 00:26:05.288
Duke: it so often.

00:26:05.298 --> 00:26:06.868
You forgot what the opposite is called.

00:26:08.453 --> 00:26:13.963
CJ: I couldn't think of a, of a,
of a good word that would, yeah,

00:26:14.113 --> 00:26:15.453
whatever the opposite is called.

00:26:16.138 --> 00:26:16.938
Duke: Yeah, I hear that.

00:26:16.938 --> 00:26:17.438
I hear that.

00:26:19.793 --> 00:26:22.948
I think you're going to be surprised
to like, super high performance

00:26:23.458 --> 00:26:28.258
is really boils down to doing a
stupendous amount of small things.

00:26:28.268 --> 00:26:29.928
Very, very well.

00:26:31.558 --> 00:26:32.808
CJ: yeah, I'd agree with that.

00:26:32.998 --> 00:26:36.588
Duke: You're going to be
surprised by the amount of.

00:26:36.588 --> 00:26:39.498
Stuff that the organization doesn't
know about service now, both

00:26:39.498 --> 00:26:42.828
at that VB level, I didn't know
it did asset management, right.

00:26:43.218 --> 00:26:46.468
Or in the front lines,
like, what do you mean?

00:26:46.468 --> 00:26:47.718
I'm not supposed to.

00:26:47.768 --> 00:26:49.988
Reassign the rhythm or,
you know what I mean?

00:26:49.988 --> 00:26:51.378
Just all this stuff that they don't know.

00:26:51.378 --> 00:26:51.778
What do you mean?

00:26:51.778 --> 00:26:52.518
There's favorites.

00:26:53.588 --> 00:26:53.938
What do you mean?

00:26:53.938 --> 00:26:55.228
I can build my own reports.

00:26:55.688 --> 00:26:59.498
Like you'll be so shocked by
the amount , of little stuff.

00:26:59.528 --> 00:27:01.848
There's just, nobody knows.

00:27:01.858 --> 00:27:03.218
Nobody gets, nobody does.

00:27:03.218 --> 00:27:03.588
Right.

00:27:04.128 --> 00:27:07.998
And, at the start, it might
feel like, Oh my goodness.

00:27:08.258 --> 00:27:12.138
We're buried in this kind of stuff,
but it's okay because you get to

00:27:12.138 --> 00:27:15.328
solve that they're easy solves.

00:27:15.388 --> 00:27:16.848
They're easy, easy solves.

00:27:18.148 --> 00:27:22.198
, CJ: for me, it just highlights, , that
service now costs a lot of money.

00:27:22.198 --> 00:27:22.238
Yeah.

00:27:22.588 --> 00:27:27.198
And I don't think we think
about that aspect enough, right?

00:27:27.198 --> 00:27:29.348
Like that, it, you know,
serves now cost a lot of money.

00:27:29.348 --> 00:27:32.938
So the more you can do with it, the
better it is for your business, right?

00:27:32.938 --> 00:27:35.938
The better it is for you
as an individual, right?

00:27:35.948 --> 00:27:39.098
And I think that just has to be one of,
I don't know if it's the North star,

00:27:39.098 --> 00:27:40.688
but maybe it's in the sky somewhere.

00:27:41.538 --> 00:27:47.968
Duke: Yeah, I, I put that right beside
because only a couple people pay for it.

00:27:48.048 --> 00:27:48.618
You know what I mean?

00:27:48.628 --> 00:27:50.598
Or , feel like they've paid for it.

00:27:51.508 --> 00:27:51.878
CJ: Right.

00:27:51.888 --> 00:27:53.328
Duke: Like the service desk.

00:27:53.348 --> 00:27:56.018
Nobody's pulling out any of
their wallets to contribute to

00:27:56.018 --> 00:27:57.958
the service now fund, right?

00:27:57.958 --> 00:28:02.328
So, so there's a lot of people that
have to use service now that don't

00:28:02.328 --> 00:28:03.918
have financial skin in the game.

00:28:04.188 --> 00:28:08.528
They don't care if it costs a
million dollars or a dollar, but

00:28:08.528 --> 00:28:11.128
they do care about the amount of
time they have to spend on it.

00:28:12.668 --> 00:28:19.098
And the paradox of it all is from our
perspective, it's raw, raw ServiceNow.

00:28:19.108 --> 00:28:23.388
Look at all the different things you
can quantify and measure and improve

00:28:23.388 --> 00:28:25.998
and automate and blah, blah, blah.

00:28:26.658 --> 00:28:30.548
But to the average ServiceNow user,
this is a bureaucratic, , this

00:28:30.548 --> 00:28:33.083
is like dental checkups level of

00:28:35.483 --> 00:28:36.353
Of excitement.

00:28:36.383 --> 00:28:37.853
It's just I don't want to do this.

00:28:37.853 --> 00:28:39.673
I don't want to get a dental
checkup in the same way.

00:28:39.673 --> 00:28:43.383
I don't want to go into service
now and log the fact that it's a

00:28:43.383 --> 00:28:47.263
bureaucratic time suck on them.

00:28:47.963 --> 00:28:51.553
, CJ: and I think that gets lost
to , the, one of the goals of any

00:28:51.693 --> 00:28:55.253
service now project has to be to
make sure the product is easy to use

00:28:55.253 --> 00:28:56.543
by the people who need to use it.

00:28:56.593 --> 00:29:01.073
And part of that, it means not
just making it look clean and

00:29:01.073 --> 00:29:02.953
slick when you land on the page.

00:29:03.283 --> 00:29:09.793
But what is the obvious next step for
the person you designed that page for?

00:29:09.833 --> 00:29:11.283
Are we ever showing them that?

00:29:11.353 --> 00:29:13.663
And look, I'm not a UI UX guy.

00:29:13.663 --> 00:29:16.403
I don't know all these paradigms
and so on and so forth.

00:29:16.433 --> 00:29:20.158
But that doesn't mean that that Can't
be one of the things that guides me when

00:29:20.158 --> 00:29:22.198
I'm building our user interfaces, right?

00:29:22.198 --> 00:29:27.378
Like, what do I not want the person who
lands on this page to be thinking about?

00:29:27.588 --> 00:29:32.348
And  how can I make their next
click as easy as possible?

00:29:32.728 --> 00:29:32.958
Right?

00:29:32.958 --> 00:29:36.288
I don't want them thinking about what
they should do when they get here.

00:29:36.768 --> 00:29:41.098
Like, if you get on a page and it's got
your, list of, open requests, I want

00:29:41.098 --> 00:29:47.808
you to immediately see a big button
that says, view this request, right?

00:29:49.118 --> 00:29:49.398
Duke: it's

00:29:49.548 --> 00:29:51.488
CJ: view details or whatever.

00:29:52.238 --> 00:29:52.558
Duke: yeah.

00:29:52.558 --> 00:29:55.298
And  there's no bottom rung on simplicity.

00:29:56.598 --> 00:29:57.158
CJ: Yeah,

00:29:57.388 --> 00:30:01.008
, Duke: I've never really had an occasion
where people said this is too simple.

00:30:01.058 --> 00:30:01.348
All right.

00:30:01.358 --> 00:30:02.718
That's 38 minutes of record.

00:30:02.718 --> 00:30:05.358
So I think we're just going to
call it a quits right here and,

00:30:05.408 --> 00:30:06.948
, work on getting a proper outro.

00:30:07.898 --> 00:30:09.058
CJ: Yeah, absolutely.

00:30:09.648 --> 00:30:09.828
Duke: All right.

00:30:09.878 --> 00:30:10.668
We'll see you on the next one.