Issue(s): (1) Whether humorous use of another’s trademark as one’s own on a commercial product is subject to the Lanham Act’s traditional likelihood-of-confusion analysis, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1), or instead receives heightened First Amendment protection from trademark-infringement claims; and (2) whether humorous use of another’s mark as one’s own on a commercial product is “noncommercial” and thus bars as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c)(3)(C).★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★
What is Supreme Court of the United States?
Supreme Court Season episodes will include all arguments that occur from October 01st to June/July.
SIDEBAR Episodes will take place between the end of the current term and the start of the next term. (July - October)