The party that's.
So bravely followed the science for the past two years and held the line and what
was true and real and real information now seems to become the party of the
anti-science party that is promoting this information, Mao information,
misinformation that is dangerous and is leading to the death of thousands
of people in America every day, the science and the biology is unequivocally.
95% of biologists worldwide agree that life begins at fertilization.
And at no other point, can you look at the human development
and say, ah, ha, there it is.
Now it's a human.
Now it's a human being.
It is only at conception.
It is only at the fertilization of an egg to science degree and biologists
agree that that is when life begins, but the left wants to bring society back.
Literally hundreds of years into the dark ages of science, where we
didn't have microscopes where we didn't understand DNA, we didn't
know what that a woman had an egg.
And then a man had a sperm.
We didn't know that.
Back in 1875 didn't know, but that's where the progressive party wants
to bring us in a regressive manner.
Due to back to a time where we didn't understand science back to a time when
the birth of a child was just a mystery.
No, no, no one really knows blatantly denying science, but
today the science is clear.
The science is.
And don't be anti science because it is misinformation,
disinformation that is leading to the death of millions of people.
This anti-science party is doubling down on their lies of misinformation,
ignoring the science, and it is dangerous rhetoric that has killed 63
million people since 1973 in America.
Today three to 4,000 people will die because of this dangerous
misinformation that abortion is safe.
When in fact abortion is murder, abortion is not safe.
Two heartbeats go into abortion clinic and one heart beat comes out.
Ironically enough, the killing of the life of an innocent baby.
Is disproportionately affecting the black and the minority people of color community
with ties to the KK cut K ties to the Nazi party ties to the democratic party
because the democratic party was the one that started the KKK who pushed this
eugenics of abortion for Margaret singer.
Who's part of the Nazi.
To come in to say, Hey, this is a great way that we can do away
with people of color and limit the population growth that people of color
absolutely bold face racist ideology.
Well, as it turns out, the progressive party is actually the regressive party
turns out that the party that quote unquote fights for the most violent.
Truly wants to kill the most vulnerable.
The party of science turns out to be completely anti-science the
party that is anti-racist actively promotes eugenics against people
of color with 95% of biologists.
Agreeing that life begins when the egg is fertilized.
Why do people seek to continue to deny science?
Well, Twitter, Facebook and Google begin to flag this misinformation
and disinformation as misinformation, this information, when will the fact
checkers step in and say, you know what, actually science is pretty clear.
Life begins at conception.
This is dangerous misinformation, disinformation that can lead
to the death of a child.
Why for instance, With this party of science denied the basic biological facts of
science that a man has an X, Y chromosome, and a woman has an X, X chromosome.
And that can not be changed.
Maybe it is because that they are no longer a liberal party, but they
have post liberal post progressive.
With a postmodern worldview that believes there is no objective morality.
There is no objective truth.
There is no reasoning or rationality.
There's only tools that can be used to push forward their ideology and
agenda because in this post liberal progressivism, the ends of a new world,
Marxist socialist, communist dystopian.
Justifies the means of being anti-science in anti-human.
Hey, it's Lucas Skrobot.
And you're listening to the Lucas Skrobot show where we uncover purpose, pursue
truth and own the future episode 281.
It is May 5th, 2022.
And if you haven't heard by now, then you actually probably have a
life worth living if you haven't heard by now, but political leaked a.
By the United States Supreme court, a draft of a ruling that they
are planning on giving on Roe vs.
Wade Roe V.
Wade was put into place back in 1973, where the United States Supreme court.
Not just made an interpretation of a law, created a lot.
So the way that the us government works it's that elected officials create laws.
And the United States Supreme court decides whether that law is constitutional
or unconstitutional in 1973, with the case of Roe V Wade, the United States
Supreme court created a law saying that.
Have a right to abort their babies.
That was the law.
And it became a federal mandate and a federal law rather than the lobbying
created by each state and the power being given to the people of that state.
Well, this leaked document is actually very, very rare in the
history of the United States Supreme.
And the other times that has happened to does not happen to this extent, ironically
enough, there was a leak leading up to the very first decision of Roe, Roe V.
Wade back in 1973, but that was after the decision had been made only a few hours
before they were posting the decision.
This was a draft that was leaked months before the decision will actually be made.
Where we'll will actually be published as a, an official ruling,
which causes a lot of people to scratch their head and wonder.
Hmm.
I wonder where this came from a wonder how this information got
leaked as it is, as it is a way for people to persuade and manipulate and
intimidate the court, which is blatant.
Just blatant.
You do not want to live in a society where the tyranny of the masses
or even a tyranny of a minority is using threats and coercion of
violence to sway a justice system.
Definitely not the way that you want to live.
So there's a couple of theories out there of who might've leaked.
This one.
It could have been someone with very liberal standings within the
court, not necessarily on the.
But that works within the Supreme court, a clerk, they would of course lose their
job, but they would have opened up to them, a world, a world of opportunity
on the left and been staged as a hero.
It could be someone on the conservative, right.
Again, a clerk who would leak this to try to solidify some of the justices votes
so that if they were overturned later, The conservatives actually lost this.
They would be able to point to say, actually, you used
to stand on this months ago.
You were for the overthrowing.
If Roe V.
Wade.
And the third potential is that it was an outside act that someone hacked
the U S Supreme court and access these documents and then leaked it to political.
No one knows there's active investigations going on to find
out, but Alito who wrote the.
He says Roe was an egregious wrong from the start a leader wrote,
according to Politico, it is time to heed the constitution and return
the issue of abortion back to the people's elected representatives.
So what does it mean that Roe V Wade very likely could be overturned
within the next coming months?
Does it mean that abortion is now out loud, out loud in all of America?
All it means is that the power is given back to the people to vote on
it and create laws in their state, which is where the power ought to lie.
In the Republic system of America.
America is not a democracy.
It is a Republic when Alito says that this was an egregious wrong, he's
saying the egregious wrong is the United States Supreme court creating a law
rather than interpreting laws that.
And that is the egregious wrong.
And he's giving that power back the states.
What does that mean?
It means that of the 50 states, 13 states, once this is over current
13 states will likely and currently have laws in place that would make
abortion completely illegal or very, very, very limited in that state.
It does not mean that abortion across America, uh, writ
large would be done with.
The, the arguments that I've been hearing on the pro abortion side,
I wouldn't say are pretty astounding.
Th th they're pretty run of the mill, which is people bringing it back to
the issue of rape on the issue of rape.
Uh, first I would say.
Rape is an egregious crime.
So the consequences for rape are hardly sufficient for how wicked and file of
a crime rape is that it's in America.
You get a slap on the wrist.
And many other cultures, the man is protected in rape
and women are prosecuted.
Women can have a death penalty on them, whereas men are
able to pretty much go free.
This is agregious agregious.
We need massive reform when it comes to laws surrounding rape.
But the argument is, well, if a woman gets raped, which in America, out
of the million plus abortions that happen every year, less than 1% is
because of rape or insets less than 1%.
So it's a very, very small minority of the abortions that happen every year.
The argument thing goes well, if, if a young girl or woman is raped, she
should be able to abort her child.
The problem with this argument is that is grossly injust.
Biologists agreed.
Life begins at conception.
Therefore that is a human life, which has a right to life.
They did, they are not guilty of any crime.
They were conceived out of a crime.
Is it fair that the woman has to carry that child through conception?
That that trauma is ongoing?
Absolutely not, but that is not the child's fault.
That is the man who created an egregious crime against that woman's fault.
He should be held liable, not the child, the child is innocent.
So there's a, you have a situation where there's something that's
terribly wicked and injustice that happened and you're seeking to make it.
You're seeking to bring healing and restoration to the situation,
killing an innocent bystander.
The child does not make the situation more, right.
It only makes the situation more wrong.
It only brings further injustice to an already dark and vial wicked situation
that's done by wicked and evil men who should be absolutely punished to the.
Extent of the law.
When I, and in these conversations with people, I always bring it back to this.
When does life begin?
They kick it around the Bush.
Well, I don't, I don't know.
I'm not a biologist.
Okay.
Well, I've, I've done the research.
I've looked at the biologists and the research that they do.
And unequivocally, they say that life begins at conception.
There's no point that you can look in the development from of a human from a baby
onwards to say, this is when life begins.
And if life begins at conception, which it does, then that individual
has rights as a human being.
And no.
No individual has the right to take someone else's life.
Well, here's the president of the United States of America, president
Joe Biden, agreeing with just this statement more, more or less.
I said, I believe I have the rights that I have.
Not because the government gave them to me, which you believe, but
because I'm just a child of God, I.
I delegated by joining this union here to delegate some obligates, some rights
I have to the governments for, for social good president, Joe Biden, right?
During this clip claims that he has rights because he is a child of God.
Not because the government gave them to him and because the government
did not give him those rights, but God gave him those rights.
The government can not take them away.
A baby in the womb has God given rights because they are a what that's right.
President Joe Biden, a child of God.
And since God has given them that right to life, no one, no mother
and no government has the right to take that life away from them.
It seems pretty obvious to me if.
To life is given by God than a mother does not have the right.
A woman does not have the right to take the life of her child.
Here's Biden again, weighing in on his religious views.
Remember president Joe Biden is a quote unquote devout Catholic.
And if you don't know, devout Catholics, all Catholics, the Catholic church
declares that life begins at conception.
Life begins at conception, the Catholic church out of all the
churches or the Christian Christian, the dome of Christian dumb.
Has held the line on abortion, stronger than anyone else across the globe.
But this is what president Joe Biden has to say.
All basically mainstream religions have historically concluded that, right.
That the existence of the human life.
And B is the question, is it at the moment of conception?
Is it six months?
Is it quickening?
Aquinas argued?
I mean, so the idea of.
We're going to make a judgment that is going to say that no one can make the
judgment to choose to abort a child based on decision by the Supreme court.
I think goes way overboard.
The president saying that all the religions are saying,
well, it's really a question.
When does life begin?
I don't know.
He's he's referring to this term installment, which religions, Islam,
Judaism included the Abrahamic faiths.
Look to you and say, we don't know.
And this was hundreds of years ago when there wasn't microscopes.
When we didn't understand DNA, who would say, we don't know the development of a
child in its womb, in the mother's womb.
And.
In Islam.
Some generally believe that it's at 120 days after fertilization others
in Islam, other Muslims and hadeeds and schools of Islamic thought say
that the embryo has installment 14 days post fertilization, 14 days.
Now he refers to here Aquinas, Aquinas.
In 19 who's was born in 1974 or, sorry.
Excuse me.
Who's born in twelve seventy four, twelve seventy four, eight hundred years ago.
Lived Aquinas, even DaVinci and Einstein.
They didn't understand.
The human anatomy of the human body.
They didn't understand DNA.
And they didn't even know that women had an aide and men had sperm.
They thought that we were all just kind of Russian, a nestled in, and that in
Adam I existed and it was, it's just these eggs that keep on popping out.
That's what they believe.
But he is now trying to reference acquaintance, which we talked about.
Aquinas.
I love Aquinas.
And Aquinas said yet.
I don't really know.
I think there must be some sort of quickening where all
of a sudden it becomes human.
I don't understand it.
So here's Biden trying to reach back to literally bringing people back to
19 or to 12, 13, hundreds to 1274.
And the good Norine the science ignoring that.
Absolutely insane.
Here's the, who, here's a tweet by the who claiming that women should have the right.
This is the director of the who, Dr.
Tedros, the women should always have a right to choose when it becomes, when
it comes to their bodies and their.
Restricting access to abortion does not reduce the number of procedures.
It drives women and girls towards unsafe ones.
Access to safe abortion saves lives.
The problem is here.
Abortion does not save lives.
There is no such thing as a safe abortion, abortion kills people.
End of story.
And the science is clear.
A person begins.
At conception, but the party of science can't get their, their science in
row, uh, justice pending justice.
Uh, Jackson, who's just put in by the Biden administration.
We played these clips probably a few weeks ago in her hearing.
She was asked about what a woman is.
Here's here's justice step.
Uh, can you provide a definition for the word woman?
Can I provide a definition?
No.
Yeah, I can't.
You can't not in case context, not a biology.
I'm not a biologist.
If she's not a biologist, then shouldn't we go and look at a
biologist and see what a biologist.
Hmm, next clip.
When a one dish life began in your opinion, Senator?
Um, I don't know.
Ma'am I don't know.
Here's the truth, ladies and gentlemen, here's the.
95% of biologists from the biological view that human life begins at fertilization.
That is when life begins, but you know what?
It's not about science.
It's not about biology.
It is about the killing of unborn children.
The shedding of innocent blood through unborn children.
It empowers, this is where we get a little swirly and spiritual,
but Hey, we talked, we talked about Megan Fox just on the last.
We're we, we talked about the drinking of blood and satanic rituals and I WASA
and opening up portals and having these spiritual encounters and spiritual beans.
The practice of killing your unborn child is the practice of Baal and Moloch, where
they would put the they'd have this brass.
Put a burning, flaming fire in the brass statue and alter to the brass became red
hot, and then they take their newborn babies and put it in the hands of this,
of this idol that was glowing red, hot and sacrifice their baby to these
gods for the sake of prosperity and to have a good harvest and fertility.
That's what these.
They have ritual satanic, uh, prostitution.
And this is the route that is driving these ideologies.
It is a spiritual route.
It is a spiritual empowerment of the dark and demonic realms through.
Through the shedding of baby's blood, which opens up the demonic powers
and portals and empowers people.
It is why Hitler was mass killing.
It is why it is why abortion is still such a massive issue.
It's because people are sacrificing their babies on the alter of prospects.
And it is, it is an, a demand.
It is a demonic activity and ritual, and it needs to be absolutely rejected.
It needs to be absolutely rejected because this is what it leads to in Canada.
Switching gears a little bit in Canada, they have begun euthanizing.
The poor sounds far fetched, but when you know what, when life is no longer valid,
When a human being loan longer has value as an individual, but only has value
when they are adding value to a society.
This becomes the norm pulling Canada.
They have the maids law, which is medically assisted suicide.
Medically assisted assistance in dying is what it's called, sorry,
medical, medical assistance in dying.
Well, they also have another law called the bill C7, which is extended.
That euthanasia law.
And now if you were suffering from an illness, which cannot be relieved
under conditions that are acceptable to you, you can now take advantage of
a medically assisted suicide in Canada.
Well, what this has led to is euthanasia euthanizing of.
There's a couple of just horrible stories from this article.
One, a woman in Ontario was forced into euthanasia because her housing
benefits did not allow her to get a better housing situation, which didn't
aggravate per crippling allergies.
Another disability, disabled woman applied to die because quote, she
simply cannot afford to keep on.
Another sought to be euthanized because COVID related debts debt,
which left her unable to pay for treatment, which kept her chronic pain
bearable under the present government disabled Canada Canadians got $600
in financial assistance during COVID whereas university students got $5,000.
So here is Canada allowing people to say, yeah, you know what I
want, I want to get knocked out.
Knock me off because I can't pay my debts because I can't afford to
keep on living rather than creating the system to help these people.
Remember, it's all about helping the most vulnerable instead of helping
really helping the most vulnerable Canada has found a way to save.
$6.9 million a year in cost reduction from the old maid system,
the medically assisted assistance in-depth and we'll save this bill.
C7 would create an additional $62 million of savings per year.
That's what 160, about $160 million or $150 million per year in savings
by killing people rather than.
Helping them another man was just living in his feces and urine
asking for, to be admitted into this euthanasia program because of his
disability and his inability of his family or himself to take care of.
And this is, this is the image of mercy and compassion that leftism wants to
bring to the world, not to help the.
Not to help the sick, not to help the dine, but to euthanize them
because life does not have meaning or value unless you're adding something
meaningful and valuable to the society.
This is the issue.
When you say that life doesn't begin at conception because there is no other point
that you can then say, life begins here.
If it's at installment at 120 days.
Well, if the baby's 119 days under 18 days with a beating
heart brainwave, Can feel pain.
You can see its fingers tips.
Does that, does that now?
You know, one day difference now.
Okay.
Well that's okay.
You can, you can kill the baby.
What about the day before you give birth?
The water breaks gives birth about to give birth.
Can you, can you kill the child then?
What about afterwards?
Because this whole argument, well, that child is dependent on the
mother and therefore the mother shouldn't be held hostage to the.
Well, there was that law that was recently put in place.
HR 2, 2, 2, 3 in California that says that a mother or
doctor would not be held liable.
If a and no investigation would happen.
If a die, a child died seven to 28 days post birth.
So if after birth, you've just lay your baby down on the table
and decide not to take care of.
It dies because you didn't take care of it.
Well, you're not held liable because after all, it's not really a human with then
people with disabilities or down syndrome.
Do they have a soul?
Do people with amnesia, do people with Alzheimer because
they've forgotten who they are.
Have they lost their.
There are so there's so many issues when life does not have value.
And when life does not begin at conception, there are so many issues that
are being manifested right before our eyes in Canada, they're pushing to allow quote
unquote, mature minors to euthanize too.
This is where.
Not just a slippery slope fallacy that one day it might end up
going there, but it is there now.
And it is there today
in a post-truth society where we have exchanged truth for lies and
reason for postmodern irrationality.
The absurd finally makes sense.
Well, the Biden administration is so committed to combating
disinformation and misinformed.
And when we say disinformation and misinformation, it really means
things that they don't agree with.
They want to combat ideas that they don't agree with.
Such as a man is man.
And a woman is a woman that's hate speech that needs to be reined in a
little bit, but actual disinformation, such as safe abortion save lives when
really safe abortions, quote, unquote safe abortions, kill people every time.
That's not disinformation, but me saying that would likely become this information
or misinformation as this moves on.
Well, they, the United States government is, has created the department
of disinformation, which is being really called the department, the
ministry of truth, which Parkins back to the 1984 book of George Orwell,
where the dystopian book, which is.
Incredible book.
I absolutely recommend that you read it where everything is controlled.
Every thought is controlled.
Every sentence is controlled.
Everything is monitored the way, what is true is being controlled
and told you by the government.
And you're not allowed to think.
Well, in this dystopian world of 1984, there's the ministry of
truth where two plus two equals.
And everyone has to believe it.
Everyone has to agree with it, but it's under this to keep you safe.
It's under the guise of helping society to moderating the conversation of society.
So everyone can live happy life and get along.
This is what is being created in America, even though in the
constitution of America, it says the federal government and the state
government cannot infringe upon.
Speech and the freedom of speech, even though this is the war that we have
been seen with Twitter, and this is why Elon Musk bought Twitter was to
do away with the moderation of speech.
This word moderation is just a clever way to say the control of
speech and the control of thoughts.
If you can control speech control thought, and if you can control
thought you can control belief.
Well, Nina Jenkins.
Was put in as the director of the, the department of misinformation.
And I was looking through her stuff for website and all her media.
And I found one interesting interview.
There there's a lot of, a lot of things that she's put out there.
Uh, funny theatrical songs, which I can, I can appreciate the wit and the humor
and the satire of it, even though it's like, well, This is legitimately crazy.
This is, I don't think she's just being funny.
I really think this is what she believes, but instead of playing that for you,
cause you might've already seen it.
I found this incredible little piece from NPR with her
talking about this information.
On pregnancy apps of all things.
These pregnancy apps are just incredibly popular among the expecting parents.
And I have to imagine that people who download them, they are not
expecting to encounter disinformation.
Give us some examples of what that can look like.
I was being peddled to.
There was a ton of advertising.
I was subscribed immediately to a bunch of mailing lists.
I started getting mail in my home.
Okay.
This is.
Advertisements on pregnancy apps, a pregnancy app, by the way,
is there as a service and they need to make money to survive.
So if you're not purchasing the pregnancy app, if you're not paying the 2 99 or
9 99 to buy the app, the person who made it for free is getting zero money
to provide you with that service.
So how are they going to monetize that?
Well, they're going to put advertisements.
Here is Nina saying that advertisements on an app, the advertisements ladies
and gentlemen is this information.
This is the person who is being placed in the federal government of the United
States, which is which people move to because they can have freedom of
thought, freedom of faith, freedom of.
But now it's, it's going to the point where there's not even freedom
of advertising, not even false advertising, just advertising.
Here's another clip by Nina, um, headlines.
Like, can you have sex while pregnant?
Which in the disinformation world, we know that those questioning
headlines are just clickbait.
And so we encourage people to write them a little bit differently to
include the main idea in the headlines.
Now, apparently.
Is this information.
Copywriting is the writing of words to sell something
or to cause people to engage.
So if I write a headline or a title of the show that makes you
say, Hmm, this is interesting.
I'm going to click on it to see what it says.
That is quote unquote clickbait.
But now it's not just a good article that stirred up interest.
It caused you to want to go and read because if.
Or someone else doesn't write a good headline for you to click and read you
won't click and read, but now according to Nina that's dis information and w in
what ways are we going to encourage, are we going to shadow banned people on the
internet for writing a good headline?
Because it could be clickbait, even though in that article they're explaining, well,
yeah, you can have sex while you're.
Here's the last clip by Nina.
This information is the false or misleading information that
is shared with malign intent.
And the malign intent here is to make money off of pregnant people.
And we can have, you know, disinformation prep for profit.
And we've seen that in the political realm.
And we've seen that, uh, outside of it as well, especially with the
anti-vaccination rhetoric we've seen during the coronavirus pandemic.
So I would say they are one in the same pregnant people.
Pregnant people, this information is making money off of pregnant people.
This is, this is the world that they want to bring to you.
One pregnant people.
I think that's just so hilarious.
I think it's just so funny too, that it's disinformation to
sell a woman pregnant woman.
However, I have a sneaking suspicion that saying that an abortion is safe.
We'll never be flagged as misinformation, even though let's
play, let's play this clip again.
This information is the false or misleading information that is shared
with malign intent shared with.
St an abortion is safe, is being shared with align intent, to make a profit off
of pregnant women, to kill their babies that is being shared with malign intent.
And it's a little.
It is a lie because biologists and science agrees that life begins at conception.
And therefore there's no such thing as a PR, a safe abortion, the who should
be flagged, the CDC should be flagged.
Anyone who's claiming that abortion is safe.
Anyone is claiming that life does not begin at abortion
is being is anti-science.
And if we're going to have flat.
On all of our, all of our posts leading back to the CDC or the wha
O or the whoever, the fact checkers, the fact checkers need to check this.
The fact checkers need to come in and say, well, actually the science
is in and life begins at conception.
Abortion is killing a child.
Well, this show is brought to you by listeners and viewers.
I want to thank you for being here and listening.
If you get value out of the show, I ask that you give value back to the show
and the value that you get out of it.
We have people who give $1 an episode, four bucks a month, and
that is a great encouragement.
So thank you for doing that.
And we have others who give 20 bucks a month.
We have others who give hundreds a month.
So thank you for supporting the show.
If you want to support the show, you can give value for value by visiting.
Scroll bot.com backslash support.
And you can give your heart cold Fiat there.
Well, don't go away.
We'll be right back with our closing Weaver and loom segment.
How do you feel about the
welcome back to Weaver Luma?
Part of the show where we take ancient wisdom and we leave
it in with our everyday lives so that we can own our future.
And we.
Our destiny, man.
I have been on a Warren buffet kick.
I think it's probably because I've been thinking a lot about
the economic situation and turmoil that we are going into, that we are
in the middle of with inflation.
And I know it's a big thing that we've been talking about here on the
show and in the zeitgeists of media.
So I pulled a quote.
But from Warren buffet, from the latest, uh, Berkshire Hathaway board meeting or
members meeting, partner meeting, and here's this one minute brilliant one
minute clip of how to defend yourself and the best thing that you can do to
protect yourself against inflation.
The best thing you can do is to be exceptionally good at something.
If you're the best, if you're the best doctor in town, if you're
the best lawyer in town, if you're the best, whatever it may be.
Uh, no matter whether people are paying you with a zillion dollars or panga,
they're going to, they're going to give you some of what they produce
in exchange for what you deliver.
And.
If you've got it.
And if you're the one they pick out to do any particular activity saying or
Playbase ball or, or be their lawyer, whatever, it may be, whatever abilities
you have, can't be taken away from them.
They can't actually be inflated away from you.
Somebody else will give you some of the wheat they produce or
the cotton or whatever, maybe.
And they will trade you for the skill you have.
So the best investment by far as anything that develops yourself
and again, not taxed and all that.
So that's what I would do if you are in a place, which I'm assuming who's
not, that's thinking about worried about inflation and wondering what
is the best thing that I can do.
To own my future.
What is the best thing that I can do to weave my destiny?
How can I create an atmosphere and a life that is able to support
my kids for generations to come?
Where can I invest, invest in your self?
Because as Warren buffet said that cannot be taken from you,
that can not be taxed yourself.
Cannot be taxed and it can never be inflated away from you.
Well, that is all for this episode.
Thank you so much for listening.
If you want to get more out of this episode, please share this
with a friend and talk about it.
And through that you will get more won by building community and
friendship to when you share something.
When someone shares something with me, I always feel loved.
And then.
You then having a conversation around these ideas, especially around the
idea of abortion and the fact that life begins at conception, we'll
help you articulate these ideas.
Better also, if you have any questions, feel free to WhatsApp
me a plus 1 2 0 2 9 2 2 0 2 2 0.
And I will love to hear from them.
And if you ask a question, that's bad enough, we'll play
it right here on the show.
That's all for today.
Go out this week.
Remember be pro science, pro biology.
Life begins at conception.
Invest in yourself and own your future.