The U N a proxy for global socialism and a shield for corrupt nations
who disregard human rights this week decided to ignore war crimes.
And Ukraine were people.
Thousands of civilians have died.
Women and children raped, murdered and rolled over by tanks because they
have a more pressing agenda to push on the world to further destroy the
societies and nations of the world.
You see the UN was too busy, launching their new campaign, unbox
me to promote and encourage gender dysphoria in children stating.
Children all around the world must be supported in expressing their
identity freely unquote, after all it is not enough to protect children
with gender dysphoria from abuse.
In fact, we need to encourage gender dysphoria in all children by effectually
confusing kids through media programming, before they can even spell their names,
the Biden administration to rally behind the UN the UN for trans gender day,
by saying, quote, we need to castrate children and give experimental hormone
therapy to kids until they're 18 when they are of age to make their own decision,
but can no longer make that decision due to the irreversible surgeries and
hormone blockers that we gave them before.
They were even three years old after all unquote, after all
sex and gender aren't linked.
We should make each child biologically sexless by sexualizing and enforcing
stereotypical, stereotypical gender norms on sex that we once called sexist.
Oh, Billy, it looks like you're cooking.
You must be a girl.
The world eagerly awaits the sequel to the UN's programming, unboxed,
me and the UN plans to title their sequel, adults or children to a
new ad that normalizes pedophilia.
This will be followed by the third in the series called loving parents
are really manipulative authority.
Authoritarian slave drivers give your kids to the state so that we can work them
as faceless units in our authoritarian state driven utopia after all.
The U N an anti-human globalists.
No, that the world, the war in Ukraine, isn't going to slim the population
down to 500 million quite fast enough.
And after 50 years, they have grown tired of waiting for climate change and
the climate apocalypse to completely wipe out humanity and their failed
attempt at creating a lab created flu wasn't, which wasn't nearly effective
enough as bill gates in George Soros might has hoped, might have hoped.
Clearly the only solution is to now destroy the slave driving business called
quote unquote family, through making every child ward of the state who can truly
love them as a faceless unit in identity.
Probably just sit number on a sheet.
And the state can finally help.
Five-year-olds explore their sexuality by banning just stationers, AKA women who
give birth to children or mothers who for CIS hetero, oppressive gender identities
on their children finally free in society from religious norms that prevent
45 year-old adult children, because adult adults are just children too.
From having secret sexual relationships with kids, states of the ward.
After all, if climate change in the flu, isn't going to stop out humanity.
The moral intellectual elites will have to do it themselves.
What better way to stop humanity then by using feminism to destroy.
And women do really need to be raced according to the Biden administration,
which is why us, the USA took the first bold step in this brave new world to
Institute the X gender on passports.
Although it fell short of the true goal of removing male and female options from
passports and ID cards altogether, so that we can create a truly androgynous
human race, which only blonde hair, blue eyed anti-racist anti humans who
are loyalists to atheism and a green new deal can be bred in test tubes.
It is a step.
At least it is a step and finally seen world free of morality.
Hope, goodness, and godliness this way.
Hopefully we will see a hopeless world.
Where maybe people will give up all on their own.
They'll stop gestating human units and turn into aimless.
Amoral trans human droids.
Hey, it's Lucas Skrobot.
And you're listening to Lucas Skrobot show where we uncover purpose,
pursue truth and own the future.
It is episode 277.
It is April 7th, 2022, and it is a brave new world all around
the brave new world all around.
Now I have mixed feelings about the UN you can't tell and on today's
show, we're going to be talking about how there is an explicit.
It's not hidden.
It's not secret.
It's not in the shadows lurking somewhere.
There is an explicit agenda to destroy family, and we're gonna be talking about
why, why they want to destroy the family.
There's a been a lot of.
Groomers and, and Disney, blatantly pushing their, their alphabet agenda on
kids to confuse kids and their minds.
It's not confusing kids and their mind.
It is that the cyst normative heterosexual gender identity has been
confusing kids for thousands of years.
And the family is forcing that upon the kids.
So we're going to be getting into gender and we're going to be looking at it from a
unique position in that the way that more conservative societies in the world, such
as here in the middle east, the way that they are viewing women is very different.
And we'll be covering this on the show today, very different.
And I took a poll which really exemplifies this, how conservative
societies are actually quite pushing courts and are fighting
towards honor and dignity of women.
Whereas this heightened Islam.
Are actually trying to erase women's existence on the whole.
But before that
breaking news updates from around the world and Ukraine, I would be amiss to
not talk about Ukraine on today's show, as it, in some ways it looks like Russia
has completely lost the war in Ukraine.
There are retreating in different areas, but in other ways I strongly doubt.
I strongly doubt that this is the end of the war.
It is more likely eight regrouping.
So I want to hit a couple of different headlines.
First of all, there have been massacres, uh, over the last week in Ukraine
stories, photos coming out of mass graves, civilians, hundreds of civilian.
And in villages killed in the streets, women and children
raped, uh, horrific stories.
Now, of course, the pro Russian media sources are saying this
all false flags, it's all fake.
Um, yeah, I'm not buying it.
I'm definitely not buying it.
I do know there is so much misinformation, disinformation out there.
It's hard to tell what is real and what is fake, but the images, the stories
that are coming out from these areas of, of Ukraine, horrific, terrifying, uh,
Zalinsky went to the UN and called the UN, asking them to wake up and pay attention.
And he said, either pay attention and begin to do something.
In Ukraine and stop this humanitarian crisis is war that's happening.
Stop downplaying this war, or totally disband yourself.
Now, as I said, I'm not a big fan of the UN there's, but there are some things that
I do like about the UN it's a mixed bag, just like everything else, but things.
So once he gets right, I think the UN should disband itself regardless.
There is a case to be made for Zelinsky to call upon the powers in the U S and the UN
and NATO to enter into this hot war, this armed conflict, it is within their right.
If your family was being attacked, if your nation was being attacked, of course,
it is your responsibility as the leader of that nation to ask for help in your
time of need while you're being attacked.
But that does not necessitate.
NATO's response.
There's not an agreement.
There's not an allied between NATO and Ukraine.
Ukraine is not part of NATO.
So there's not a necessity as far as contracting or agreements,
treaty scope for the U S or any other nation to get involved.
But really what this is turning into is a, another proxy war is a proxy war
between NATO and the west and Russia.
And that is how Putin and others are seeing this conflict.
They are seeing it as a, a conflict between the west and U
S and Western allies and Putin.
This is from Bloomberg Bloomberg says that the United States and its
Western allies failed to understand that from president Vladimir Putin's
perspective, they're already at war with.
This is according to a former head of UCO spoil and was
once Russia's richest person.
He goes on to say, Putin has said from the very beginning that this war includes
NATO, Houdin thinks NATO is weak and that they will not defend the Baltics.
If Russia attack those nations, all former members of the Soviet
union, if that plays out, he said, Putin believes NATO will collapse.
And that means America's global influence will plummet.
Again, we've been talking about a new world order, not from some
globalist elitist conspiracy theory, but it's what we're seeing.
We're seeing a shift right now on global macro order and, and power in the way.
We saw it with Afghanistan, the pulling out of Afghanistan, we saw
it with with the new Alliance to give nuclear submarines to Australia.
We we've sought with the Russian trade or Chinese, um, new silk road and the
waterways and railways and pipelines.
We've been talking about the shifting on a global stage that
can, will eventually most likely undermine America's global influence.
We've talked about how the us dollar in many ways is imperiled.
Maybe, maybe not in two years, five years, but maybe in 10, 20 years, there
really could be a massive macro event.
Causes people to abandon the U S dollar as a store of wealth and
currency and adopt something new.
I do not believe that currency is on the Sr.
I do not think it's the Ethereum or Bitcoin or the, the wan I
don't think so, but there will be something that's coming, which leads
us to this other 0.2 more points.
One, another headline from world news says that Vladimir Putin wants to build
pro a pro Russia empire from Vadis stock to Portugal all across Europe.
They're looking to establish a new order to dismantle the
west power and NATO's power.
America's.
And establish a new hierarchy within the world where Russia and China is on top.
This is what they're pushing for, whether it happens or not.
We'll see.
But I, I think that this conflict calling a conflict, but it's a war.
This war is far from over.
I really do believe that we're seeing the beginning of international conflicts.
And this is even what the one of the top U S generals has said.
And it was published on CNN top EWAS general potential for significant
international conflicts is increasing.
The headline goes top us.
Military officer told lawmakers Tuesday that the world is becoming more unstable.
And the potential for significant international conflicts is increasing.
Decreasing.
And what we're seeing right now in Ukraine is only a, a beginning of
unrest is what we saw in Afghanistan.
It's the beginning of global uncertainty.
And in that time of global uncertainty, other powers seek to make their moves,
to establish greater trade dominance and economic dominance in the world.
And as a global superpower, the United States is waning
with 2020 $4 trillion of debt.
80% of the us dollar has been printed in the last two years.
There are major, uh, warning signs and flags in the U S economy that
we've touched on in the show.
So there is indicators that that unrest is coming.
There's indicators that instability.
And so what do we do when we see those indicators?
So what do we do when we all of a sudden realize, Hmm, there
might be a famine in the land.
There might be, there might be stormy waters ahead.
We don't just sit back and do nothing.
We don't just sit back and say, well, Casey, Ross, RA.
I hope, I hope I'll be okay.
I hope that God takes care of me in shawl law.
Crochet, inshallah.
No, we take action.
We prepare when you hear that there's a famine coming to the land.
You build store houses.
When you hear that unrest is coming into the land, you strengthen
your, your, your family unit.
You strengthen your troops, you strengthen your borders.
You prepare.
If you see a storm coming, you prepare.
So don't sit back and be passive.
Take steps.
Learn, educate yourself and prepare for instance, that yield curve that we
talked about having a dipped and become inverted the 10 to two year yield curve.
The majority of the time that the yield curve has been inverted, where the
interest rate on a two year bond or note becomes greater than the interest that
you can get on a 10 year note, when that becomes inverted within six to 24 months,
there is a very, very strong correlated likelihood that you will see a recession.
And so the yield curve inverted for a moment a couple of weeks ago, and then
it stayed inverted for about a week.
That is a strong sign that in the next 24 months, 2023, 2024,
we would likely see a recession.
So that gives you.
That gives you time to actually do something about it.
Another question though, when it comes to America, this is by the wall
street journal, will America will the youth of America fight for America.
If it's invaded, they did a poll.
Were they asked, I guess, gen Z, if America was invaded,
would they stand and fight?
And the majority of Americans said that they would not.
They said that they would likely a high percentage said that they
would likely flee the country.
Now there's not an exact one-to-one ratio.
You don't exactly know what people end up doing in the midst of wartime, but many
said they would not fight for the country.
They just flee the country, which is not a sign of.
Not a sign of strength.
Well, these, these toxic and I really do mean toxic.
I really do mean destructive ideas of destroying the family and the
family unit and having a sense of not unhealthy pride, but a sense of
pride in who you are as a nation, who you are as your ethnic or cultural
identity, who you are as a family and your family name, your family heritage.
Those have been systematically chipped away in America over the last number
of decades, systematically from, from agendas, from the top down from
CRT, from education systems media, they all are pushing in this identity
of victim, hood and oppressors.
And if you are of a certain.
Makeup a population immediately.
You become an oppressor.
And there's great shame in that.
There's not a lot of virtue in that.
There's not a lot of currency that you can Curry with those around you in that.
So you begin to adopt victim mentalities, victim identities, because
that then aligns you as a victim.
And if you are in a victim in America, you have status, very dangerous place because
people who have victim mentalities are not the people that you want building society.
Cause you're not going to build a healthy society.
They're going to build a society out of an orphan spirit and feeling like a victim.
So there's a strategy that has been propped up against Judeo-Christian
Western culture and Western values.
And that all stems from the family, the strength.
Societies any society is in the family unit, individuals, individuals then
come together and build families.
And within that family unit, you have a level of cohesiveness and health.
And the health of the family units then creates health of communities.
Health of communities then create health of cities and
then creates health of nations.
Now, two families on different, different parts of a city or a nation or community
might not be identical, but there is a level of shared value within that culture.
And there should be healthy, pride, healthy, gratitude, healthy
appreciation for who we are as a society, who you are as a society.
And I know from living here in the middle east, it is, is actually looked down upon.
When someone isn't at least proud of their ethnicity or heritage, whatever
that is, whether it's Romanian or Polish or, uh, from Pakistan, people
are proud of their family heritage, but in the west, in America, there's
something sick that is going on.
And by sick, I mean, there's something mentally wrong.
That's going on, where we're completely ashamed of even good things that we have
accomplished as an American society.
Of course, there's a lot of horrific, horrific atrocities that have been
committed by American society, but there's also a lot of good things
that has come about from it as well.
And that's something we can be proud of.
Of course, just like in our family, there are things that we can feel
shame about from our, our family lineage or history or our parents.
There's things that we don't like that we want to change and break,
but there's also areas that we can.
Our families and honor our parents.
Well, this attack is focused directly focused directly at destroying family
units and gear Joe 62, just left a comment on the YouTube stream.
Seeing people forget, come your Rouge, separating children
to indoctrinate them family.
First family, always a hundred percent, Joe, this is a hundred percent right?
What you're saying?
They attack the family, separating children from the family because it's in
the family that values are passed down.
That they're strict.
So they're attacking the family.
How were they attacking the family right now in the west, but by attacking
women by explicitly, explicitly trying to erase women, the U S government
just put an X gender on their passport.
I mean, if that's not a clown move, I mean, what are, what are nations around
the world going to think, when you show up at their border with your passport, that
allows you to travel internationally and you show up at their border and you're
like, yeah, I'm an X, I'm an X person.
They're like, oh, what's that?
Well, I'm, I'm an ex what happens when you're across the world
in a totally nother country.
And you think now you have the right as a man to enter a women's bathroom.
It's it's literally, it's just literally erasing.
I posted a question on, on the ground just this week.
And I asked what is a woman?
And the responses I got were really, it was really fascinating to see the
difference between how the majority of people from the west answered this
question and the majority of people from the middle east answer this question.
So I'll start with some answers from the west.
First answer was a woman with a vagina.
That's a human with a vagina is a woman.
Yes.
Now the issue may be with that statement of defining a woman in that manner is
that well, if a man gets reconstructive surgery to have something that looks like
a vagina, does that make him a woman?
I, no.
A human, a human as a woman.
Okay.
Yeah.
Having a period is a woman.
Okay.
This is a good.
Because we say that men cannot men straight, right?
This whole idea that it's birthing people, it's gestures, just stationers
that it's, you know, it's not man or women who can give birth.
It's just, people will know a person who has a period is a woman, but
there are women who hit menopause and no longer have periods.
There are, there are women who have to have hysterectomy
and no longer have periods.
They are still women.
Here's one in 2022, only a multi-faceted logical conflict, too
complex to manifest itself in nature.
A woman is a multifaceted, logical conflict to complex
and manifests self in nature.
I don't even know what that means, but it's evident that this is what the
mindset of what a woman is in the west.
A woman is someone who identifies as.
We recently heard from the top of the Supreme court, who is
likely to be nominated a woman saying I'm not a biologist.
So I can't give a definition for a woman.
I'm not a biologist.
I'm not a biologist, another clip that we're going to actually play here.
Who's a woman.
A woman is someone who identifies as a woman.
How sick, how cyclical is that?
A woman is someone who identifies as a woman.
So I could be a woman and you, anyone could be a woman.
All you have to do is say, I identify as a woman and therefore I am woman here is a,
uh, a clip from Charlie Kirk, uh, talking with a feminist that a college about just.
Yeah.
What does a woman, uh, somebody who identifies as a woman.
So can I become a woman?
Do you have dangerous for you thankfully?
No.
Oh, but so only if you have gender dysphoria, you can identify as a woman.
It's a medical condition.
So anyone at any time can become a woman?
Uh, no.
Well, anyone could have gender dysphoria.
It's use claim it upon yourself.
I, you know what I am, I'm actually thinking I might, I might
actually have gender dysphoria.
So can I become a little, I wish you the best in your transition.
And I hope that society accepts you.
So let me ask you a question.
So one fascinating point here, this feminist is admitting that
transgendered ism is a mental disorder.
It, it is a disorder.
If someone, and this is where my empathy does.
If someone has bipolar or schizophrenia or has actual diagnosed depression
issues, or they're actually struggling with something, they
actually have a mental disorder.
I'm going to be compassionate.
I'm going to love that person.
I'm going to care for that person.
But what I am not going to say is that, you know what, it's normal having voices
in your head and, you know, you should just embrace the voices in your head.
You should just embrace them and just listen to whatever they say,
whatever those voices in your head say, you should just follow
it because that is who you are.
That is your identity.
No, that's not what we do.
If we, that's not what we do with mental disorders, what we do with
mental disorders, we say, you know what?
I recognize that you are going through an identity crisis.
I recognize that there's pain.
There's wounds.
There's.
With legitimate mental disorder that is going on, we are going to help
you overcome this mental disorder, but with transgenderism, because it's
attached to a greater agenda to destroy womanhood and destroy the family unit,
we no longer say, let me help you.
We say that is who you are.
And in fact, we want to make sure that everyone has a chance to
get sick with gender dysphoria, starting with little kids.
And instead of helping little kids, we're going to ban people from helping kids.
The moment that a child might one day say, Hey, look, Hey look, teacher.
I'm a girl.
Hey look, teacher.
I am a boy.
The moment that it's opposite of their actual actual biological X, X,
X, Y gender, they say, ah, that's it.
We need to switch it.
But I thought gender was fluid.
Why?
Why are you all of a sudden forcing gender norms on biological sex?
If they're detached to now a boy, one time calls himself a girl, and now
you need to do a bottom surgery or girl calls himself a boy, and now you
need to bind and do a top surgery.
I thought they weren't connected.
So why is someone all of a sudden the opposite of what they are?
Why is that was trying to be pushed as normal?
And if it is, and it is a mental disorder, why don't we train to help people out
of it rather than trapping people in it?
Oh, oh anyways, here's the following clip.
Oh, oh, in this clip as well.
Got dimension.
Here's Kirk saying, well, so anyone can, and this young, very kind young woman
says will know not anyone can won't bet anyone can have gender dysphoria.
And she kind of resigned to that point and she says, oh yeah.
Well, I hope you have happy transition if you have genders for you.
So it literally means anyone can be a woman at any point of time
when it's convenient for them, because gender dysphoria is fluid.
It comes and goes.
Here's the rest of the clip.
So, so you're a feminist.
And you, you say anyone who has gender dysphoria can transition
to become a woman at any time?
That's that's your position?
Sure.
Okay.
Do you think chromosomes have anything to do with determining what a female is?
Yes.
Okay.
So then where does the gender dysphoria come into place?
I think that sex and gender are different.
Things are different.
Right.
But then what is a woman?
Somebody who identifies as a woman.
So anyone can be a woman at any single time.
You've asked me this question.
It's still now got it.
And you're a feminist.
I am.
Who are you trying to protect?
What women are you trying to be?
Women, all women that you regard regardless of, of, uh, whether or
not they've transitioned, whether or not they've transitioned well.
Um, I wish you well in the coming situation, where now as a feminist,
you're going to have to live under the tyranny of men who we think there
are women enter the clip cut out.
So now you're going to have to live under the tiring of men who think
they're women fascinate a couple of fascinating things in this back and forth.
First, when you, when you define a woman, as anyone who identifies
as a woman, you still have an identified what womanhood is.
And she's saying, well, I'm going to defend I'm, I'm trying to defend all
women, whether they've identified as transitioned as woman or not.
So that would mean any.
She is looking to defend any and protect any man who at some point
in their life, maybe identify as a woman is totally lost the entire
thread of the feminist movement.
Now, if there's a lot of things, clearly the progression of the feminist
movement has become extremely toxic.
Uh, I, I love women's suffrages.
I love the fact that we fought that many people fought for women to be able to vote
and work and be treated as equal to men.
But something strange then began to happen where it wasn't that
women and men should be equal, but it was women should become men.
Women should be, as men should be the same.
And the moment that that happened, it began to distort the identity of
what a woman is and what womanhood is.
And it's gone to its logical conclusion, which will then a man can identify as
a woman and that as a woman, because a woman is anything that you identify
as, and now women are being placed underneath the tyranny of the men that
they're trying to be protected from, by them calling themselves swimming.
It is, it is actively working to erase the woman identity by using and
weaponizing feminism against women.
Brilliant.
Well, here are some of the responses from listeners and
viewers from the middle east.
I'm seeing what a woman is and there, there is.
It's a stark difference from the first half.
The second half, is this a woman is a mother, a wife, a sister, a.
She's caring and listening.
She's the reason for our existence, notice that dignity and honor
and respect and pride that is being put into what a woman is.
Here's here's one that is actually very biological nature.
I know who this one's coming from.
He said X X, when being mature, that's a great definition of woman, someone
with two X chromosomes and as a mature adult, meaning that they've, they've
transitioned from girlhood into womanhood.
Another one, everything we can't be as a man.
Again, bringing honor and dignity to women, empowering women, creators
of new lives, opposite version of X, Y creator of new life.
Again, empowering women seem to push women up to a place of
honor status, dignity, and power.
Now their answer.
God's gift to man.
Amen.
God's gift to man women is it was the, the last species species
species is the right word.
The last thing to be created, according to biblical narrative, God created the world.
The soul was good created, man.
So that was good.
And then, mm something's still missing and created woman instead.
That's very good.
And all men agreed.
Right?
So it's, it's it really is the pinnacle of creation.
Uh, in many ways.
Next answer was one who understands a woman is able to solve everything
that's point taken that's that's true.
A woman, his life, one person's answer was only a poet is able to
describe a woman essentially saying it's simply that poets, right?
And talk about because there's a mystery, there's something
powerful in who a woman is.
The last one was someone who raised a man that a real woman
is someone who raises up men.
And this is true mothers.
I've said it multiple times during the show, mothers are the most
influential person in society.
It's a mom who raises their children so influential in each and every one of ours
lives for the better or for the worse.
But the big overarching theme that I see, the difference that I see
between these two sets of answers is that the west has gone so far that it
has begun to smother what a woman is and now people are having to fight.
Do you define in an elementary way?
What is, and isn't a woman because a woman has become nothing.
According to the feminist definition, a woman is someone
who identifies as a woman.
What is that?
And when you go on to ask within w you know, what does a woman, they
say, well, you can't identify a woman because if it's such a broad
spectrum that it's undefinable.
So now in the west, we are fighting to bring back a level of definition so that
we can give proper dignity to real women.
Instead of men who are, are co-opting the title woman.
So they can be of a victim class and further oppress women in sports and
prisons and locker rooms in the west.
It's just amazing.
Amazing what progress, um, atheism has made in the west.
Uh, amazing.
However in the middle east, they're really on a broad scope.
I mean, you look at Afghanistan, perfect example.
They're still fighting for women to be able to go to school in many, in
some places, it was only recently in some countries that women here
in the middle east were allowed to drive, allowed to vote equal pay.
There is truly in many parts of the world, a great disparity of rights between men
and women, and the answers portray that from the way that people in the middle
east responded to what is a woman?
A woman is someone who has this dignity and honor, and they're looking to push
an elevate, a woman's status in society to, to bring them honor and power and
dignity in the rightful place as an equal in society with men while maintaining.
They're their unique identity in womanhood.
This is a good thing just as we need to maintain our unique identity as men
in men hood, it's the same thing, both women and men, but instead the west is
pushing for all of humanity to become act grogginess, asexual beans, who, who have
no relational ties to any one person, but everyone is shared by themselves.
And this is what Huxley wrote about in brave new world.
This is the world that they are blatantly pushing for.
And it's not it's, it's not, it is definitely not a hidden agenda
in a post-truth society where we've exchanged the truth, rabbis and reasons
for reason for postmodern irrational.
The absurd finally makes sense.
And one thing that is particularly absurd is a movement that is connected
to everything that we've said.
If of erasing, do you race your of women, which is antinatalism, we've mentioned
antinatalism multiple times on the show.
Anthem naturalism is the belief that is immoral.
That is amoral to have kids and bring kids into the world and this deep sense
of guilt and shame of bringing kids in the world and actively seeking to persuade
humanity, not to procreate, not to bring children in to the world in stating that a
family is a toxic slave driven institution that we need to totally abolish.
So here is, uh, here are some images.
From a new movement.
It's not a new movement.
It's actually, I wouldn't say old, but it's been around for a while.
Uh, entitled stop having children stop having kids.
And I've pulled a series of images from their website of banners that people are
holding up on street corners, trying to encourage people, not to have children.
I thought we'd read through some of them as it's quite insightful of
where they're going as a movement.
Now, if you're listening on a audio only version, not on a video version
and you have a podcast, 2.0 certified app, you'll probably be able to look
down at your phone right now and actually see some of these images right
there on the cover of your screen.
So here's, here's the first one.
Why is having kids still celebrated?
They w they literally want you to stop celebrating your children.
Stop celebrating, having kids, because the ideology says that kids are in
human beings are destroying society.
They're destroying the environment that we, the humanity is the virus.
Humanity is the virus.
And finally in 2020 nature, the world was able to rest from the plague of humanity,
crushing nature, crushing mother nature.
This movement wants you to stop celebrating children.
It stops valuing children, even though they say, well, actually
we're valuing children even more.
No, they do not value kids.
They want you to stop having kids.
They believe that humans are the source of all problems.
Another one, a lot of humans wish they were never.
Okay.
Yes, there are a lot of humans who struggle with depression who wish they
weren't born, but I would bet a lot of money based on what we read from the
stories of the Holocaust, that there are many people who want to live.
And many of those people who wish they were never born.
If they were put in a life and death situation, they
would fight for their life.
They would clean onto their life, even though there's problems and troubles.
Having kids is far beyond a personal choice.
This is true, which is also quite contradictory to when they say my body,
my choice as a woman say most of my body, I'm going to control my body.
I'm going to have my choice and I'm going to kill the baby inside
of me because it's my personal.
So this is a contradictory statement within their worldview, and yes, it
is far, far beyond a personal choice.
You're bringing another human being into the world and that child, even
though, even though the world is filled with suffering pain and vulnerability,
there is beauty and pleasure in it.
There is beauty in our struggle in, in our suffering, in our hardships.
There is, there is a level of beauty that comes
when we look at our heroes, our heroes are all people who have overcome,
who have persevered time and time again, and the come out overcoming.
So yes, it is far beyond a personal choice because it's between two
people and you're bringing another human into the world, but it is.
And we were creating eternal beets.
Here's one life may be worth continuing, but is it worth starting a
contradictory, contradictory statement?
If life is worth continuing, why wouldn't it be worth starting?
Why would you not want to give someone else the beauty and
the pleasure of experienced in the world and an opportunity to
make the world a better place?
Women can be whole without becoming a mom.
100% women can absolutely be whole without becoming a mom.
However, many women as maybe in your young twenties, they say, I don't want
to become a mom, but many women as they grow older, they begin to have an urge.
And psychologists talk about this.
Jordan, Peter talks, Peterson talks about this.
As they grow older, they begin to have an early.
Within the mint and the desire within them to have a child.
If a woman can't have a child, that doesn't mean she's not old.
It doesn't mean she's not a real woman.
If someone chooses by by choice not to have a child, it doesn't mean that
she's not whole, it doesn't make her less than it doesn't mean that she
should experience shame or condemnation.
But it is to say that in many, not all, but in many women, there is a
desire in many men, there's a desire to have kids and it is a God given
desire, be fruitful and multiply.
And I believe our family, like, I believe that having kids is what will make the
world a better place, especially when you look at these movements that are so anti.
If they are saying don't have kids and you're like, I disagree with
pretty much your entire philosophy.
And then you say, don't have kids.
It makes me think.
Hmm.
I don't know why, but I probably should have more kids.
It's probably is the solution to your problem.
Here's another one.
We were the most invasive and overpopulated species.
Again, humanity is the virus.
Stop spreading intergenerational trauma instead spread inter generational
genocide instead, make sure that you don't pass on your human genes.
I mean, this is, this is Darwin at its greatest.
If these people who believe this anti Nautilus, if they cease to procreate.
And we ceased to give them a voice in indoctrinating our
own children, our own families.
Then this movement will inevitably die.
And I really, I really hope it does die.
And I hope it dies.
One of two ways.
One by people who believe this getting touched and healed and becoming a pole
from their trauma, from their pains, from their wounds that they've experienced as
children from their families or wherever it comes from from their suffering, that
they find real healing in their grief and or by a society waking up to the
fact that this is a toxic, dangerous ideology that leads the leads to genocide.
Here's another, what is one unselfish reason to have a child?
I do not know if this individual, this man holding the sign has ever had.
But, uh, I can for sure say that raising children is quite an unselfish act.
If I want to be a good parent, I have to be unselfish and I have to
be selfish, selfless to care for my children and pour in time, money and
resources and energy into loving my kids.
Why bring kids into a world you distract yourself from?
Well, first I would say, if you are distracting yourself from the world,
you probably need a vision for your life and you probably need to focus
your life to make an impact and purpose.
Define that rather than being passive in escapism and turning to entertainment.
Um, why bring kids into a world that you distract yourself?
Because the world needs people who aren't going to hide their heads in
the sand, not bringing someone into existence can be an act of love.
This is home.
I mean, goodness, this whole movement is just so toxic.
You don't need a mini me.
Let's stop dumping our problems onto future generations.
Make love, not babies.
Think beyond yourself, why play Russian roulette with someone else's
life it's this whole worldview of hopelessness is this whole worldview
of hopelessness and insane that the family is, is a toxic thing.
Here's that as we go into the, the rest of the segment, there's
an article that we talked.
I think we talked about this article, maybe a number of times.
From Harvard magazine calling for the abolition of family, total
destruction and ending a family.
And it's not just a hypothetical fear-mongering risk that people have
on the or fear that people have on the right or conservative movements.
It is something real that is written about, and there's a vast amount of
literature in history that points to it.
Uh, we even, we talked about this at length of what's happened in China,
uh, with the cultural revolution and those back in episode 1 55 to 1 59
in that series really continues on to episode 1 64, where we're talking a lot
of the Marxist black lives matter, uh, socialist communist agenda and ideology.
So here's a clip from turning point USA where this very insightful young woman.
Totally hitting the nail on the head when it comes to why we actually
should take the left after word.
When they talk about abolishing the family.
What are they going to do when you say that the world's going to end in 10
years and the world is overpopulated.
So to solve the problem, we can't be having as many kids just
seeing the way that they connect all these issues in their minds.
It makes me really worried because in communist China, they literally
forced abortions onto anybody who had more than one child.
Then they forced sterilized all the women that dared to get pregnant.
So women were secretly having their kids and then keeping the kids in little
tents and, and barns and the countryside.
So this is not us like freaking out and creating some
hypothesis of what could happen.
This is actually what leftist regimes do, right?
Especially when they start running out of resources.
We now have the Biden food shortage coming, and this is a classic stepped
after leftist policies destroy a country after they had the famine
in China, they had no resources and it resulted in the one child policy.
So this is disturbing.
Leftism is evil, it's satanic, and I'm not surprised at all that.
Now they're saying don't have kids.
Leftism is evil and it is satanic in China, different policies,
manmade human policies that.
To mass famine in the USSR, there were policies that took stripping
farmers from their land and putting in people who didn't know how to farm.
And then when they did farm, they didn't receive any portion of their crops.
So it all went back to the state and it led to a massive decrease in production
and mass famine across the USSR policies, lead to manmade famines in the policies
that we're seeing, that the policies that we've seen over the last two
years have led to food shortages, high gas prices, and massive inflation.
These are things that have been driven by decisions by policies, from leftism
that is having a certain ideology, one that is against free markets.
And one that is against family units.
One that is for the, the state to own.
Individuals and own children, not the family.
So in may, June, 2020 Harvard comes out with a article where they're
calling for that evolution, the abolition of family, and seeing
that families are nothing but slave driving units that are indoctrinating
children with SIS oppressive, hetero, normative, uh, ideology.
And the way that they're making this argument to attack families is by
saying homeschooling families, raising their kids and educating their kids
rather than allowing the state to educate their kids is dangerous.
The reason that they say that it's dangerous is one.
We now see a lot of people because of the indoctrination of the left and
the attack on children in schools.
Poor performance of public school system are pulling their kids out of schools.
And even kids are questioning the university system because it's is
a, an industrial complex for the indoctrination of leftist ideology.
And people are saying, you know what, really?
We don't want that.
We want our kids to learn math.
So read and write and to think critically not to be indoctrinated
with leftist theories.
So they're pulling them out, which of course is dangerous.
It's dangerous to leftism, which wants to control society.
Leftism wants and sees not people as individuals, but everyone is
a unit with in the whole and it's everything is done for the good of.
There is no such thing as individuality.
There's no such thing as morality.
There's no such thing.
As someone being unique, everyone is there to serve the greater good.
And if you don't come into alignment, there's no such thing as a reeducating,
you it's, you're broken because this is how you are chemical.
You're just like sack of chemicals.
And the way that you think is the way that you think in that can't be changed
because that's a chemical makeup.
And so what they did in the USSR is send people to blogs and they
sent them to the brick wall in the back with a shooting range.
This is the progression.
This has happened within the last hundred years, bless 50 years.
This is recent history.
These very ideas being played out in recent history.
So homeschooling is dangerous because that means the state is
not able to school their arguments.
Bartholet.
And we've mentioned this article before Bartlett says that while this
is isolating children, it's isolating children and we can't really follow up
and there can be cases of child abuse.
However, studies show that child abuse among homeschoolers is lower
than child abuse that happens within the public school system.
And based on empirical evidence, quote, based on empirical evidence to date,
there's a remarkable rate of abuse of U S school children by school personnel,
AKA teachers, coaches, bus drivers, administrations, and custodians.
And these are the people that they want to oversee education, man.
And a very small fraction of abuse within the school system is reported by school
personnel or as being reported to law enforcement or child welfare personnel.
The idea that someone who doesn't know or care about your kid is going
to take better care of them than you birth them and raise them and
nurse them, and got up at three in the morning to take care of them.
The idea that some stranger is going to do a more caring job to take care of
your kids and hundreds of others, kids at the same time, as they sit in some desks
somewhere as an administrator is absurd.
This idea of centralization of power to largely unaffected unelected
officials, anywhere in the world is a bad idea, which is why the family unit
is such a good idea because now that.
It's broad and decentralized, and you don't have the ability
of one person abusing hundreds of people throughout decades because
it's broadened decentralized.
Each family unit is able to look after its own.
And if there is an infraction, there's a higher percentage that that's going
to actually get dealt with within a family unit and gives more protection.
The real reason, the real deep motivation behind this is
quote surveys of homeschoolers.
Show that a majority of such families by an estimate estimate of up to
90% are driven by conservative Christian beliefs or quote unquote
extreme religious ideology.
Oh, my, they have values.
They believe that marriage is between a man and a woman.
They believe that.
It's an individual with an X and a Y chromosome and a man can not become a
woman and a woman cannot become a man, no matter how much reconstruction, surgery,
or hormone blockers or identifications you say that you have, why would you,
and again, th the contradictory thinking here Barlett says, quote, the issue is,
do we think that parents should have 24, 7 essentially authoritarian control over
their children from ages zero to 18?
I think that's dangerous.
Okay.
So who should have that control here?
Here it is.
I think it's always dangerous to put powerful people in charge
of the powerless and to give you authority of powerful ones and give
the powerful ones, total authority.
So because of that, we are going to set ourselves up as the powerful ones and
we are going to be completely powerful.
All zero to 18 year olds and will become the powerful authority.
Rather than that authority being distributed across millions of parents.
We're going to concentrate that power among a few educators and administrators
who have government positions
final bit from this article, she says she urges that we forbid concerned parents,
the loving act of educating their own children, replacing them instead with
government approved powerful people.
It makes no sense, but this, this feminist theory expands far beyond that and
they want to abolish the family because they want to abolish capitalism and
capitalism and family go hand in hand because when you have a strong family
unit, you're able to pass on generational wealth from person to person, to person,
generation, to generation to general.
And if you can destroy that, that transference of generational
wealth, then you can cause people to be reliant on the government.
The government can take power.
The government can have power and the government can Institute
the policies that they want.
This is socialism, this is capitalism or communism, excuse me.
And it has killed hundreds of millions of people, hundreds
of millions in recent history.
So should think twice when you hear these ideas of abolishing the family
and ask why, why, why what's the real agenda of them wanting to indoctrinate
children with the alphabet agenda from a very young age and say that
parents have no rights of how their child is educated and that's dangerous.
Why is it really?
Because they want to groom your child.
Yes, but not necessarily sexually.
They want to groom the mind of the next generation to adopt these ideas so
that they can have a revolution and see the downfall of Judeo Christian values
and conservative values worldwide.
That is, that is why, well, this ties into a quote unquote, radical queer politics.
And this is from a feminist theorist, Sophie Lewis, who has a new book that
is rethinking the ideas of pregnancy and the idea of family and seeing that
family is essentially just slave labor.
And in her, in her book, in this, uh, interview, she doesn't call.
Women mothers.
She calls them just stagers or people who carry fetuses.
I mean, if that doesn't sound industrialized to you, then I don't know.
What does adjust Stater no longer?
Are you a mother who loves and cares for your children?
You are adjust Stater.
You are somewhat, it's the act of having a baby is just the act of labor.
And you are one unit within the unit of society.
She, she goes on to say that it is, she says, quote, that is why it is so valuable
to de naturalize, the mother, child bond.
She talks about how there's these cases of mothers abusing their children
or cases of, uh, times where mothers aren't mentally well and harm their.
And therefore making the argument that we need to de naturalize,
the child, mother bond, and that the just Stater has the baby.
But that quote and I quote, this is what she said, trying to find this
quote right now, children should belong to no one, but themselves children
should belong to no one but themselves.
So when the mother gives birth that the parents aren't over the child, aren't
caring and tending for the child.
We need to sever and break the bond.
We need to break the ideas, quote, unquote, the idea that
babies belong to anyone and.
Babies belong to themselves.
And if a child just belongs to themselves and who do they really belong to?
Again, they belong back to the state.
They belong to a group of people who have been elected or unelected who
then make decisions for everyone else.
Did it makes decisions, how society as a whole is going to what values
are going to be put in place.
And those values are currently in the west anti life anti-human
anti-God anti-conservative values of atheism so that people will be
continually dependent on the state.
The state plays a role.
The state is something that is good.
It is to maintain justice, the rule of law and to protect nations and defend nations
and their people from inside and outside.
It has its role.
It has its place.
And I'm grateful for all, for the governments of the world.
I'm grateful that we have a system of the state and of government, but it is
not to overstep its bounds into taking total control over the family unit.
Well, this show is brought to you by listeners like you.
I just want to thank everyone who has recently decided to support this
show financially, even if it's at a couple of dollars a month, that is so
encouraging to me as a creator, uh, of knowing that you value the time
and the energy and the effort that I put into producing this podcast.
So if you want to support the show, it has value for value podcasts.
We don't have, uh, ads rolling all over the.
And so if you want to give, you can visit Lucas growbot.com backslash support
and give your hard, cold Fiat there.
Or if you are into the Bitcoin world, you can give via listening on a podcast, 2.0
certified app, like Sphinx or pod, friend, or breeze, and you can load up your
Bitcoin wallets and you can stream sets and Sitoshi is there will, don't go away.
We are going to be right back with our closing Weaver and loom segment.
Welcome back to Weaver.
Aluma part of the show where we take ancient wisdom and we weave
it in with our everyday lives so that we can own our future.
And we've our destiny.
You're talking about.
Antinatalism on today's show, which.
Really hopeless worldview, where we believe that it's immoral to
bring children into the world because of the state of the world.
How can you bring a child into the world when it's so broken?
So hopeless, so dark, and I can identify with those feelings many times in my life.
Uh, I've mentioned a few different times recently.
How in the last number of months, we've suffered two different miscarriages,
one early on with the first five weeks.
And second one was, you know, into the second trimester, 14, almost 15
weeks along, we suffered a miscarriage.
It was quite painful.
Uh, lots of grief, lots of questions asking, okay.
If, if God is good, God cares for us and God sees us.
Why?
Why do we still suffer?
If I have these promises, why do I still have pain?
Why do I still suffer with.
Go through these trials and hardships and you begin, I have begun to think
and realize, reflect even on the Holocaust of how there are many people
who were righteous and upright who loved their families, did the right thing.
And they still ended up in Auschwitz.
They still ended up being shot in the middle of the street.
That suffering is pervasive around the world.
And those are hard, hard things to wrestle with.
And my wife and I, we were, she's reading this book entitled prayers in
the night, and it's by Trish Warren.
And she's talking about suffering.
She's relating her own stories of suffering through miscarriages.
And so my wife's reading this and being greatly encouraged by it.
And she reads me a couple of passages.
I too was greatly touched excellently, written very easy to read poetic
in its format in many times.
And, uh, Trish said something that really struck me and I'm going to paraphrase.
Oftentimes when we're in this wrestling and we see the hopelessness,
the depravity of mankind and the suffering of mankind, we turn to God.
We say, God, if, if you were good, why do bad things happen?
Why do we suffer?
Why are we vulnerable?
We want an answer.
But even if, even if we were given an answer in the form of words, it would
just be more words to battle with and suffer with and fight against because it
doesn't take away from our pain and to paraphrase, she says, God does not keep
us from vulnerability and suffering.
Instead, he steps down into our vulnerability, into our suffering,
and that was, uh, it really hit home.
It really touched my heart, um, not in a cliche way, but it really
made me realize that what you know, life is filled with vulnerability.
Life is so fragile from our kids, from our, our life, you
know, here today, gone tomorrow
and we're not going to do away with suffering or vulnerability.
We're not able to keep our kids safe.
We can make them to be strong so they can face hardships and vulnerabilities in a
strong way, but we can never take away the vulnerability that are our kids facing.
By and large powerless to protect our kids from every threat to protect our
family or our nation from every threat as we've seen in the last couple of years.
But God, he steps down into our frugality.
He stepped down into our vulnerability and he walks with us in your relationship as
a father throughout it so that we're not alone in it, but he identifies with it.
He knows our sorrow.
He knows our pain and that brings me and I hope it brings you great comfort
in knowing at the answer may not be in words, but the answer is in his nearness
and his closeness and his love for you.
No matter what your circumstances may be.
And in the end, he does make all things new.
Well, that's all for today's episode.
Thank you so much for tuning in.
If you want to get more out of the show, share it with your friends, because it
gives you something to talk about or fight about, which can be entertaining depending
on what sort of level of personal interpersonal conflict you like to have.
That is all.
Please go out this week, hug your kids, give your friends high fives who
are having babies and, uh, encourage them in their, their motherhood.
Encourage your parents.
Thank your parents for raising you, uh, and go out and seek truth.
So you can own the future and build a strong, healthy family in society.