DEV

From C's 50-year-old foundations to Go's rising dominance in cloud infrastructure, this episode maps the 2025 programming language landscape — helping developers, founders, and tech-curious listeners understand which languages matter, and why.

Show Notes

Not all programming languages are created equal — and in 2025, the gap between choosing the right one and the wrong one can mean the difference between a system that scales and one that fails. This episode of Development cuts through the noise to examine the languages actually shaping modern software, drawing on the complete 2025 programming language guide to deliver a clear-eyed look at where each language fits, what it costs, and what it's worth.
Here's what the episode covers:
  • C and C++ — why two languages from the 1970s and 80s still underpin embedded systems, high-frequency trading, and AAA game engines, and why mastering them commands some of the highest salaries in the industry.
  • C# and Java — the workhorses of enterprise software, each with distinct ecosystems (Microsoft's .NET and Unity for C#; Netflix, Amazon, and Minecraft for Java) and real tradeoffs in memory use and verbosity.
  • Go (Golang) — the quietly dominant force in cloud-native development, with a simple syntax, excellent performance, and average developer salaries climbing past $135,000 a year.
  • JavaScript and its ecosystem — why JavaScript is the web's native tongue, how Node.js, Next.js, and Electron.js extend it far beyond the browser, and what it means that Discord, Slack, and VS Code are all built on web technologies.
  • PHP and Python — PHP's unfair reputation versus its real-world dominance (including Laravel and much of the internet's back end); Python's unmatched readability, AI/ML library ecosystem, and the performance tradeoffs that come with it.
  • SQL, LabVIEW, and Scratch — the specialized languages that don't fit the general-purpose mold but remain indispensable in data management, scientific research, and computer science education respectively.
The episode's central argument is one worth holding onto: there is no universally best programming language, only the right language for a given problem. Understanding that distinction is what separates thoughtful builders from reactive ones — whether you're writing the code yourself or making decisions about who should.
More from the show: if you're thinking critically about the tools your team uses, don't miss The SaaS Audit: How to Find the Tools Worth Replacing First.
DEV
RFP

What is DEV?

Software and web development from the side that has to ship it and then live with it. Architecture decisions with a cost attached, scoping, technical debt, hiring and vendor selection, and the AI tooling question every engineering team is now answering whether they planned to or not.

Each episode takes one decision — rewrite or refactor, framework choice, build versus buy, how to scope a fixed-bid project honestly — and works through the tradeoffs, including the ones that only show up in year two. Written for engineering leads, technical founders and the people who fund them. Five or six minutes, no hand-waving.

Topics include rewrite versus refactor, build versus buy, scoping fixed-bid work honestly, technical debt you should keep, framework and platform choices, hiring and vendor selection, code review culture, and where AI tooling actually helps.

Produced by DEV.co, web and software development. Full details, services and further reading at https://dev.co