1
00:00:01,111 --> 00:00:02,411
All right, how's it going, everyone?

2
00:00:02,411 --> 00:00:08,871
Welcome to another episode of Forward Thinking Founders, where we talk to founders about
their companies, their visions for the future, and how the two collide.

3
00:00:09,091 --> 00:00:13,771
Today, I'm very excited to be talking to Beau Schaefer, who's the founder, CEO of
Playswise.

4
00:00:13,771 --> 00:00:15,491
Welcome to the show, how's it going?

5
00:00:15,544 --> 00:00:17,158
I'm doing well, how are you?

6
00:00:17,783 --> 00:00:18,503
I'm good.

7
00:00:18,503 --> 00:00:26,423
I am, you know, just here doing a bunch of calls, but we have this podcast, which I always
look forward to whenever I have podcasts scheduled in my day, because I get to meet

8
00:00:26,423 --> 00:00:29,617
someone new, interesting, working on working on cool stuff.

9
00:00:29,617 --> 00:00:33,991
um So let's kind of just dive right into what you are working on.

10
00:00:33,991 --> 00:00:35,543
What is Playswise?

11
00:00:35,822 --> 00:00:44,042
Yeah, so placewise is using computer vision to get in-depth basketball analytics from
broadcast video.

12
00:00:44,722 --> 00:00:48,862
So NBA has a ton of cameras in their facilities to get some of these insights.

13
00:00:48,862 --> 00:00:59,402
And right now, we're working on a way to use computer vision, AI, machine learning, that
type of stuff to get the same analytics just from broadcast video.

14
00:01:00,535 --> 00:01:06,102
So let's say, once this is built, why is first, is this already built?

15
00:01:06,102 --> 00:01:06,763
Are you building it?

16
00:01:06,763 --> 00:01:11,358
And two, once you're able to get this data, uh who would be interested in it?

17
00:01:11,358 --> 00:01:13,815
Is me as a spectator, am I interested?

18
00:01:13,815 --> 00:01:18,637
Is a coach interested in evaluating talent to maybe get someone from another team?

19
00:01:18,637 --> 00:01:20,329
Who cares about this data?

20
00:01:20,642 --> 00:01:26,684
Yeah, so I think starting off, I played basketball at Duke, so this is what triggered my
curiosity in it.

21
00:01:26,684 --> 00:01:31,785
And I saw AI being used in other applications and thought, I wonder if that's happening.

22
00:01:31,785 --> 00:01:34,006
Or I knew it wasn't happening in the basketball world.

23
00:01:34,006 --> 00:01:43,288
um But essentially, my thought was, can you use something like ChatGBT and ask it for
stats or questions and be able to get an output that's actually accurate and good?

24
00:01:43,288 --> 00:01:48,870
um And current answer is I'd say no, especially to the depth we want it now.

25
00:01:48,870 --> 00:01:51,110
um

26
00:01:51,110 --> 00:02:00,224
I think right now, uh since I'm on the side of basketball, I'd say as like a player, my
thought is like, how can coaches use it or people on staff?

27
00:02:00,224 --> 00:02:03,016
So I think that'll be like the initial target.

28
00:02:03,016 --> 00:02:13,090
However, as a player, like there are definitely times where I think I would want, you
know, to record myself practicing shooting or games and be able to get just data from it,

29
00:02:13,090 --> 00:02:20,944
like even just how many shots I made, uh how many ah like dribbles I took or what

30
00:02:20,944 --> 00:02:23,311
kind of tendencies I had and stuff like that.

31
00:02:24,983 --> 00:02:26,164
Yeah, that's awesome.

32
00:02:26,164 --> 00:02:32,807
I am curious, know, were you in, I guess, what came first, your interest in basketball or
your interest in tech?

33
00:02:32,807 --> 00:02:35,008
And if it was basketball, then tech.

34
00:02:35,008 --> 00:02:39,243
ah How did you, how did you kind of discover the tech world?

35
00:02:39,243 --> 00:02:41,940
And if it's the opposite, like, how'd you first get into tech?

36
00:02:42,476 --> 00:02:43,627
Yeah, that's a good question.

37
00:02:43,627 --> 00:02:47,448
think I really stumbled upon this kind of accidentally.

38
00:02:47,448 --> 00:02:52,561
I think I always knew from for a while, I knew I wanted to get into sports somehow.

39
00:02:52,561 --> 00:02:54,161
I didn't know when or how that would be.

40
00:02:54,161 --> 00:03:05,396
And then I think I've been always pretty interested in, uh you know, AI tech and it's been
booming, uh obviously, with chat, tpt and LLMs and BLMs even.

41
00:03:05,477 --> 00:03:12,440
And I kind of just saw a lot of it being developed in like a broad focus for users.

42
00:03:12,470 --> 00:03:15,522
like your everyday person for random things or and whatnot.

43
00:03:15,522 --> 00:03:23,077
And then it kind of started to dabble into other verticals like legal stuff or uh
medicine, stuff like that.

44
00:03:23,077 --> 00:03:26,880
And then I just kind of thought of, you know, this would be really cool on the basketball
side.

45
00:03:26,880 --> 00:03:38,197
think uh having a lot of friends or like scouts, coaches, analysts, that type of thing,
hearing their daily workflow and me thinking, like you guys have to do all this manually,

46
00:03:38,197 --> 00:03:42,320
like seems seems kind of crazy to me, considering all the advancements

47
00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:45,960
with technology right now and so I think that's probably what kind of sparked it.

48
00:03:45,960 --> 00:03:55,620
So I don't know if there's probably I guess my initial interest was basketball but I
didn't mean for it to be basketball when I found the tech side of it.

49
00:03:55,691 --> 00:03:56,372
No, totally.

50
00:03:56,372 --> 00:03:57,672
That makes sense.

51
00:03:57,813 --> 00:04:03,677
And, you know, we were talking, you know, earlier before we were recording about about
Twitter, that's how we met, right?

52
00:04:03,677 --> 00:04:04,508
We met on Twitter.

53
00:04:04,508 --> 00:04:11,624
And, you know, as I was saying, I probably interview 80 to 90 % of the guests who come on
the podcast, I meet on the internet.

54
00:04:11,944 --> 00:04:21,643
How has like the internet been useful for you as you've been, you know, you know, building
this out, you know, getting into tech, you know, using Twitter, are there other sources or

55
00:04:21,643 --> 00:04:22,644
websites that you use?

56
00:04:22,644 --> 00:04:24,234
Like, how's the internet helped you?

57
00:04:24,245 --> 00:04:29,461
Yeah, uh I think the tech world's very open.

58
00:04:29,461 --> 00:04:31,894
They open source a lot, which is cool.

59
00:04:31,894 --> 00:04:37,139
So you can kind of go on there, test things, see if it could work for your application, or
see how someone else is using.

60
00:04:37,139 --> 00:04:39,073
uh

61
00:04:39,073 --> 00:04:47,100
their LLM or VLM or whatever it is or their models and seeing how they're using it and
seeing if you can kind of apply it to yours.

62
00:04:47,100 --> 00:04:50,222
So it's definitely been uh inspiring in that sense.

63
00:04:50,222 --> 00:05:00,390
And I honestly think if you aren't on Twitter or really keeping up with podcasts or using
something like Perplexity to get updates, think you're definitely falling behind.

64
00:05:00,390 --> 00:05:03,332
um I think that is a battle, though.

65
00:05:04,466 --> 00:05:10,132
Every time I go on Twitter, I feel like there's an update in some sort of new model or new
this, new that, new capabilities.

66
00:05:10,132 --> 00:05:13,899
um But yeah, I think, yeah.

67
00:05:13,899 --> 00:05:15,099
Yeah, sorry.

68
00:05:15,099 --> 00:05:25,719
It's just, it's interesting because the standard advice is focus on your customers, you
know, turn all that stuff off and just, you know, talk to your users, build product,

69
00:05:25,719 --> 00:05:26,459
right?

70
00:05:26,459 --> 00:05:30,739
But in this age of AI and you know, look, there's been AI for decades, right?

71
00:05:30,739 --> 00:05:32,019
But we're just in a moment.

72
00:05:32,019 --> 00:05:36,019
We're in a moment where it's progressing at a very rapid rate.

73
00:05:36,259 --> 00:05:37,719
I think you do have to be online.

74
00:05:37,719 --> 00:05:42,219
Like I think you do have to be on Twitter, know what's dropping, just so you're in the
know and

75
00:05:42,219 --> 00:05:48,165
Maybe if you're using a model today or using a tech technology today, in a year it could
be completely irrelevant.

76
00:05:48,165 --> 00:05:51,188
And you need to know that and be on the ball.

77
00:05:51,188 --> 00:05:53,270
But as you said, it's a balance.

78
00:05:53,270 --> 00:06:00,378
You don't wanna switch models every five seconds or you don't wanna switch technologies
every day or every week, because that's just gonna be a pain in the butt.

79
00:06:00,378 --> 00:06:02,941
ah But it is the battle.

80
00:06:02,941 --> 00:06:04,030
How do you think about that?

81
00:06:04,030 --> 00:06:05,813
Like you're building in this space.

82
00:06:05,944 --> 00:06:11,033
How do you get, do you get distracted or do you let yourself get distracted by these new
models?

83
00:06:11,033 --> 00:06:12,529
Like how do you handle that?

84
00:06:12,529 --> 00:06:13,510
that's a good question.

85
00:06:13,510 --> 00:06:23,054
think I tend to, if I get distracted, it's like, okay, I look at the post, I might go to
the link or whatever and check it out for a second, but I don't immediately switch.

86
00:06:23,054 --> 00:06:27,936
uh I'd have to have a lot of conviction that this model's better, this is why we're gonna
use it.

87
00:06:27,936 --> 00:06:35,780
ah But right now, I'm working on fine tuning our current models and more customizing them
to our needs.

88
00:06:35,780 --> 00:06:41,883
A lot of the stuff on Twitter, from what I've found, is if they're open sourcing, it's
pretty,

89
00:06:41,903 --> 00:06:43,924
It's too like a broader demographic, I'd say.

90
00:06:43,924 --> 00:06:53,730
um But the biggest thing is, uh if I do see something new, I'll, I have a couple advisors
I talk to that are experts in like computer vision or machine learning that I trust, and I

91
00:06:53,730 --> 00:06:59,534
know they've done a lot of good work, so I'll kind of consult with them and get some
advice if I do.

92
00:06:59,534 --> 00:07:02,185
Or I'll send it to them and say, did you see this?

93
00:07:02,185 --> 00:07:04,657
Check it out, and they'll kind of give me some feedback.

94
00:07:06,103 --> 00:07:07,043
Yeah, that makes sense.

95
00:07:07,043 --> 00:07:10,343
It does leave me to wonder, like, how are you spending your time right now?

96
00:07:10,343 --> 00:07:11,903
It sounds like you're fine tuning your models.

97
00:07:11,903 --> 00:07:13,763
Do you just be taking a lot of shots?

98
00:07:13,763 --> 00:07:14,383
Are you dribbling?

99
00:07:14,383 --> 00:07:16,143
Are you like giving a data to train?

100
00:07:16,143 --> 00:07:21,643
And if it's not that specifically like how are you training without giving away your
special sauce?

101
00:07:21,965 --> 00:07:29,408
ah I think yeah, right now a lot of my time is coding slash getting these models better
and more accurate.

102
00:07:29,408 --> 00:07:39,722
um It's funny like on one hand, I think it's like the chicken versus the egg battle where,
okay, I need to make these models better and more accurate for teams, coaches to use and

103
00:07:39,722 --> 00:07:41,393
trust, but.

104
00:07:42,094 --> 00:07:46,634
the computational power it takes to get these models accurate.

105
00:07:46,954 --> 00:07:51,474
For example, like, let's say I have a model that's 90 % accurate what it wants to do.

106
00:07:51,474 --> 00:08:08,074
To get it from 90 to, or I should say, let me say 95 % to 96 % versus getting it 80 to 90
% is exponentially harder because I just like the amount you have to train it to get

107
00:08:08,074 --> 00:08:09,054
better.

108
00:08:10,094 --> 00:08:12,047
So yeah, right now that's why I'm kind of in the race

109
00:08:12,047 --> 00:08:15,107
money pre-seed.

110
00:08:16,447 --> 00:08:19,867
But yeah, sorry I don't remember the initial question.

111
00:08:19,867 --> 00:08:20,107
fine.

112
00:08:20,107 --> 00:08:20,807
It's fine.

113
00:08:20,807 --> 00:08:26,087
I it's like, when you're as you're training or as you're like, you're building the tech, I
have no idea.

114
00:08:26,087 --> 00:08:27,147
I'm not I'm not technical.

115
00:08:27,147 --> 00:08:29,267
I'm like, you know, I'm a BC guy.

116
00:08:29,267 --> 00:08:30,287
like a podcast guy.

117
00:08:30,287 --> 00:08:31,607
I'm not like a tech guy.

118
00:08:31,607 --> 00:08:32,367
Right.

119
00:08:32,427 --> 00:08:37,827
So do you do know, feed your model like videos of like, like I'm a Phoenix Suns fan.

120
00:08:37,827 --> 00:08:41,327
If you could you feed it a Phoenix Suns game and it gets better?

121
00:08:41,327 --> 00:08:46,347
Is you actually feed it like live images or a video of you of you working is actually none
of that.

122
00:08:46,347 --> 00:08:47,881
And you're just going off of like a

123
00:08:47,881 --> 00:08:50,581
it already knows how the motions work because it's AI.

124
00:08:50,581 --> 00:08:52,379
It's like, how do you know how to train it?

125
00:08:52,379 --> 00:08:53,377
I don't know.

126
00:08:53,377 --> 00:09:00,310
I think, I guess know how to train it based on, let's say there's a model, let's say
there's, yeah, there's a model of like object detection.

127
00:09:00,310 --> 00:09:11,726
So just being able to detect like player hoop ref ball, for example, and you'll, put in a
video through an API, get the results back to see what it labels.

128
00:09:11,726 --> 00:09:19,489
You'll go through and see, okay, it's misreading like people court side as players or it's
misreading refs as players.

129
00:09:19,489 --> 00:09:23,041
So that's where you would go in basically uh redo the

130
00:09:23,041 --> 00:09:24,592
and then train it again.

131
00:09:24,592 --> 00:09:27,605
uh So yeah, a lot of my time is spent doing that.

132
00:09:27,605 --> 00:09:36,504
I think a lot of it's going to a bunch of basketball events and games and things like that
and connecting with coaches, ah users, things like that.

133
00:09:36,504 --> 00:09:41,068
uh That's pretty much it right now.

134
00:09:41,697 --> 00:09:43,450
Yeah, that makes sense.

135
00:09:43,450 --> 00:09:50,601
bet when coaches or folks in the industry or in like, I guess the sport, hear about what
you're doing, they must be jazzed.

136
00:09:50,601 --> 00:09:54,096
Like there's probably not that much out there that's quite like this, right?

137
00:09:54,096 --> 00:09:55,096
Is that right?

138
00:09:55,096 --> 00:10:02,637
Yeah, so there's a couple things that are out there that are going or do something similar
to what I want it to do.

139
00:10:02,637 --> 00:10:08,224
uh Like the base product of being able to...

140
00:10:09,197 --> 00:10:13,238
uh get possessions clipped up, right, from a full game.

141
00:10:13,279 --> 00:10:16,310
But that's done manually, uh for the most part right now.

142
00:10:16,310 --> 00:10:20,462
I know of a couple other companies trying to do some computer vision stuff.

143
00:10:20,462 --> 00:10:24,603
I don't think like they have all the features that I'm thinking of.

144
00:10:24,603 --> 00:10:26,444
It's my knowledge anyways.

145
00:10:26,444 --> 00:10:34,987
uh yeah, like everybody I've talked to in the basketball world and even in general have
been super supportive, like think it's a great idea, like it would be sick.

146
00:10:34,987 --> 00:10:37,619
ah They tell me I'm the person to do it.

147
00:10:37,619 --> 00:10:38,409
So.

148
00:10:39,145 --> 00:10:42,254
Now I'm just trying to have that come into fruition.

149
00:10:42,645 --> 00:10:43,203
no, 100%.

150
00:10:43,203 --> 00:10:44,297
That's great.

151
00:10:44,571 --> 00:10:54,301
Do you spend any time thinking about other parts of tech or like is there any is there any
developments in the startup world or tech tech world that are interesting to you that may

152
00:10:54,301 --> 00:10:57,545
not be directly related to what you're currently building?

153
00:10:57,729 --> 00:11:06,253
Yeah, I think something interesting, it's kind of tied into what I'm building, but just
like the whole AI agent thing, like how much you can really automate.

154
00:11:06,253 --> 00:11:13,436
uh And I honestly think AI, I don't know if it'll replace entire jobs.

155
00:11:13,436 --> 00:11:17,598
It probably is already starting to a little bit, but like you're higher, more skilled
jobs.

156
00:11:17,598 --> 00:11:21,880
I think if you don't know how to use AI, like you're definitely gonna fall behind.

157
00:11:21,880 --> 00:11:27,693
uh And so if you know how to, know, prompt LLMs, build agents, things like

158
00:11:27,693 --> 00:11:29,284
that can make you more efficient.

159
00:11:29,284 --> 00:11:32,146
think that's where AI is the most helpful.

160
00:11:32,146 --> 00:11:37,300
Like my thing even, I don't want this to replace video coordinators or coaches or
analysts.

161
00:11:37,300 --> 00:11:47,936
I think it'll make their job much more efficient because they'll be able to go through
more film, at more data, things like that, and just have more informed decision making.

162
00:11:48,555 --> 00:11:54,395
The thing with agents though is I think that no one really

163
00:11:54,965 --> 00:12:03,599
has a defined definition of what an agent is and everyone just slaps agent on their
product and they're like, hey, we have agents and then us as a excited industry is like,

164
00:12:03,599 --> 00:12:07,741
oh, know, XYZ has an agent and we get excited.

165
00:12:08,641 --> 00:12:13,029
have you seen uh an agent that you think is the future?

166
00:12:13,029 --> 00:12:16,025
Like, guess, let me actually, let me ask a different question.

167
00:12:16,585 --> 00:12:24,259
Have you seen technologies that you think will be around in 15 years that like power
agents or an agent that you think in its current form will exist in 15 years or are we

168
00:12:24,259 --> 00:12:25,389
just really early?

169
00:12:25,612 --> 00:12:29,367
in that development of like a technology in your opinion.

170
00:12:29,367 --> 00:12:32,110
yeah, I think a lot of it is really early.

171
00:12:32,110 --> 00:12:37,075
think a lot of people are kind of throwing and then we're gonna see as time progresses
what sticks.

172
00:12:37,075 --> 00:12:42,861
uh I think as far as AI agents, I think things that are good are being able to...

173
00:12:43,246 --> 00:12:45,086
use it as almost like an external brain.

174
00:12:45,086 --> 00:12:55,146
So if you can connect it to your email, Otter, Otter bots or whatever, note taking apps,
things like that, and it's able to recall information for you that you might have

175
00:12:55,146 --> 00:12:58,906
forgotten, I think that's where it could be really cool or helpful.

176
00:12:59,006 --> 00:13:01,846
And I kind of have some stuff set up for that.

177
00:13:02,906 --> 00:13:07,146
But as far as like an agent doing something completely for me,

178
00:13:08,982 --> 00:13:10,248
You can do it.

179
00:13:10,248 --> 00:13:14,001
I don't know if I trust it yet, but you can obviously do it.

180
00:13:14,805 --> 00:13:16,119
Yeah, I-I-

181
00:13:16,119 --> 00:13:24,399
I haven't leaned out on it, but I'm kind of waiting for just the industry or at least some
folks to be like, oh, this, this is the thing to try.

182
00:13:24,399 --> 00:13:32,198
Cause I feel like I've been not burned, but kind of disappointed in being an early adopter
through a lot of this tech specifically in the agent world.

183
00:13:32,198 --> 00:13:35,959
It's just never quite, at least from my experience, never quite as marketed.

184
00:13:35,959 --> 00:13:42,919
So I'm like, I'm expecting to do blanks and then we can get you maybe 80 % of the way
there, but you can't get the full, the full hundred.

185
00:13:42,919 --> 00:13:46,025
And it's kind of a letdown cause the whole idea of a gut.

186
00:13:46,025 --> 00:13:47,745
an agent is it can work a ton.

187
00:13:47,745 --> 00:13:52,345
You tell it what to do and it does it, then it tells you once it's done it, right?

188
00:13:52,345 --> 00:13:53,665
Or you just know.

189
00:13:53,825 --> 00:14:00,825
So I think it's probably out there, just like the phrase, what the future is here, but
it's not evenly distributed, like something like that, right?

190
00:14:00,825 --> 00:14:02,045
It's probably similar.

191
00:14:02,857 --> 00:14:06,410
So I have a couple questions around your time in college.

192
00:14:06,410 --> 00:14:11,534
did you, like you play basketball, you you play basketball.

193
00:14:11,534 --> 00:14:12,865
Were you, are you art?

194
00:14:12,865 --> 00:14:15,227
Well, I'm gonna ask, are you still in college or have you graduated?

195
00:14:15,227 --> 00:14:18,139
Cool.

196
00:14:18,139 --> 00:14:23,383
So when you were in college, were you, were a lot of your peers?

197
00:14:23,383 --> 00:14:27,592
uh You said you wanted to do, was there a lot of tech like in college?

198
00:14:27,654 --> 00:14:32,645
Were you influenced by the scene at your college or not necessarily?

199
00:14:32,786 --> 00:14:37,808
Um, I think when I was in college, like part of my college years was COVID.

200
00:14:37,808 --> 00:14:39,749
Um, so that's when we were all on zoom.

201
00:14:39,749 --> 00:14:41,270
So that's, guess, tech, right?

202
00:14:41,270 --> 00:14:49,824
As far as AI, like no one was really worried when I was there worried about people using
chat to BT for essays or anything like that, because it wasn't that good.

203
00:14:49,824 --> 00:14:54,816
Like, I don't think it was until this past year, maybe where it became really good and you
can give it context.

204
00:14:54,816 --> 00:15:02,920
can give it like templates for it to kind of follow, um, an instruction, but, um, I wasn't
using any, any of like chat to BT.

205
00:15:02,920 --> 00:15:08,323
or entropic or Gemini or any of that when I was in college.

206
00:15:08,443 --> 00:15:11,665
But I think we definitely knew it was kind of on the come up.

207
00:15:11,665 --> 00:15:17,468
um And it was more innovative than real life.

208
00:15:17,528 --> 00:15:23,972
I think we still thought it was, as far as I know and what I use, speaking personally, I
think we thought it was more innovative.

209
00:15:23,972 --> 00:15:27,733
This will be in the near future, but it wasn't implement now.

210
00:15:28,587 --> 00:15:29,567
Totally.

211
00:15:29,567 --> 00:15:34,432
I honestly can't imagine having access to this tech while I was in school.

212
00:15:34,432 --> 00:15:38,107
I graduated Arizona State 2016 before all of this.

213
00:15:38,107 --> 00:15:40,417
Just like a year after opening, I was founded, I guess.

214
00:15:40,417 --> 00:15:50,396
And it's just kind of crazy to think that, yes, students just today, any age, not just
college age, but high school, middle school, they've access to this tech.

215
00:15:50,396 --> 00:15:52,107
And then some schools are gonna...

216
00:15:52,115 --> 00:16:00,913
lean in and they're gonna help the students use it to the best of their ability, kind of
like a calculator, and some are gonna say no AI for anything and it'll be interesting to

217
00:16:00,913 --> 00:16:04,746
see how things just, know, things go in the future.

218
00:16:05,167 --> 00:16:09,021
So what do things look like for you, you know, over the next couple of years?

219
00:16:09,021 --> 00:16:11,443
Like what's the focus on for plays-wise?

220
00:16:11,443 --> 00:16:13,715
Like you said, you're raising a pre-seed.

221
00:16:13,715 --> 00:16:17,418
What's like some of your goals that you'd like to have accomplished within a couple of
years?

222
00:16:17,710 --> 00:16:29,230
I think a couple years, I mean, I'm kind of delusional, but like if I could say every like
Power 4 school was using it, I think that would be the goal in two to three, four years.

223
00:16:29,510 --> 00:16:31,470
Like I want it to be kind of league wide.

224
00:16:31,470 --> 00:16:36,150
want it to be accessible for teams and players.

225
00:16:36,150 --> 00:16:38,830
I want as many people and users as possible.

226
00:16:38,830 --> 00:16:41,630
I think that's with any given software, right?

227
00:16:41,790 --> 00:16:47,730
But I think something to be able to say, oh, every Power 4 school,

228
00:16:47,734 --> 00:16:52,447
college uses this software, um I think would be incredibly cool.

229
00:16:52,687 --> 00:17:01,463
And I think just being able to like right now the industry or like the the products that
I'm I guess competing with have completely monopolized the industry and kind of everybody

230
00:17:01,463 --> 00:17:10,139
in in basketball has told me that like, huddle and synergy are their main video platforms
to get game footage uh kind of reviewed and stuff.

231
00:17:10,139 --> 00:17:11,890
And I I kind of want to disrupt that.

232
00:17:11,890 --> 00:17:17,584
Because I think I think they're lacking with some things and I don't think they've been uh

233
00:17:17,584 --> 00:17:20,398
um as present for their users.

234
00:17:21,599 --> 00:17:27,007
I kind of wonder if they have a disadvantage in that they were built well before this AI
boom.

235
00:17:27,007 --> 00:17:33,177
So they're not AI native versus you're building this now you're able to build kind an AI
native company from the ground up.

236
00:17:33,177 --> 00:17:34,979
It probably gives you an advantage.

237
00:17:35,080 --> 00:17:35,531
Mm-hmm.

238
00:17:35,531 --> 00:17:37,162
Yeah, would think so.

239
00:17:37,162 --> 00:17:44,549
I think I can be more efficient at things um than somebody else could, you know, manually
doing a lot and they're still doing stuff manually.

240
00:17:44,549 --> 00:17:48,243
Built, you know, 20, 30, 40 years ago.

241
00:17:48,243 --> 00:17:54,529
Like, you can even tell by the UI of HODL and Synergy, like, it looks like it's from the
1990s or whatever.

242
00:17:54,529 --> 00:17:55,755
um

243
00:17:55,755 --> 00:17:57,376
That's crazy.

244
00:17:57,376 --> 00:17:58,337
I'm familiar with Huddle.

245
00:17:58,337 --> 00:18:01,689
There was a period I had a company a few years ago called Seed Scout.

246
00:18:01,689 --> 00:18:05,152
We were helping connect at that time founders, investors and job seekers together.

247
00:18:05,152 --> 00:18:09,065
But then we started to expand for a period of time to athletes.

248
00:18:09,065 --> 00:18:13,888
So we had an ambition to connect athletes to coaches, to schools, to brands.

249
00:18:13,888 --> 00:18:15,990
And we did it for six months or something.

250
00:18:15,990 --> 00:18:18,832
But I found Huddle around this time and it's fine.

251
00:18:18,832 --> 00:18:23,035
It does the job, but it's definitely not a magical experience by any means.

252
00:18:23,498 --> 00:18:24,278
yeah, I would agree.

253
00:18:24,278 --> 00:18:36,378
And then I don't know what I guess package you had, but seeing some of the stuff on what
they give to teams on like how they label plays or actions like half that like there was

254
00:18:36,378 --> 00:18:42,098
one time I was on it and it labeled the complete wrong player like not even close.

255
00:18:42,098 --> 00:18:44,238
So it's just like things like that.

256
00:18:44,558 --> 00:18:48,268
Like when we're talking like winning games and

257
00:18:48,268 --> 00:18:52,278
the threshold to what's gonna push you over to win a game.

258
00:18:52,278 --> 00:18:54,690
We just can't have silly mistakes like that.

259
00:18:54,690 --> 00:18:59,925
And that's why we obviously have coaches, analysts, a lot of people on staff to do it
manually.

260
00:18:59,925 --> 00:19:07,730
But when you're paying a large subscription, I think it should be more accurate or better
product, better user interface, stuff like that.

261
00:19:08,119 --> 00:19:09,939
100 % no it makes sense.

262
00:19:09,939 --> 00:19:18,299
Well if someone wanted to kind of learn more about what you're doing online, connect with
you maybe on Twitter or X, I still call it Twitter, I probably always will.

263
00:19:18,899 --> 00:19:24,219
Where can someone learn more about Playswise, you know, your online presence, where can
someone connect?

264
00:19:24,524 --> 00:19:26,095
Yep, mean Twitter's good.

265
00:19:26,095 --> 00:19:37,125
check my Twitter and Instagram DMs pretty regularly, LinkedIn, all the basic social media
platforms and then uh can email me at bo at playswise.com or check out the website and

266
00:19:37,125 --> 00:19:38,365
connect with me there.

267
00:19:38,977 --> 00:19:39,348
Cool.

268
00:19:39,348 --> 00:19:41,080
Well, I appreciate you coming on the podcast.

269
00:19:41,080 --> 00:19:44,285
It's really interesting space that you're building in and I'll be following along.

270
00:19:44,285 --> 00:19:45,497
Thanks for coming on.

271
00:19:45,497 --> 00:19:46,472
Thanks, Matt.