Misunderstanding Covenant Theology: Andrew Wilson Debate Reaction Part 2
In this episode, Jacob Winograd provides part 2 of his reaction to a recent debate with Andrew Wilson, focusing on covenant theology and the applicability of Mosaic civil codes in the new covenant era. Jacob answers audience questions, addresses misunderstandings about covenant theology, and elaborates on the distinctions between the old and new covenants. He also discusses the implications for Christian ethics and libertarian philosophy.
Key Themes:
- Debate Reflection:
- Jacob reflects on the overall success of the debate with Andrew Wilson and highlights the unexpected shift in topics from marriage to libertarianism.
- Emphasizes the importance of having an unedited debate for transparency.
- Audience Q&A:
- Jacob addresses various questions raised by Andrew's audience, particularly those related to the non-aggression principle (NAP) and God's actions in the Bible.
- Discusses the distinction between horizontal (human-to-human) and vertical (human-to-God) relationships in Christian theology.
- Natural Law and Covenant Theology:
- Explains the difference between natural law and the moral standards imposed by God.
- Discusses the concept of eschatological intrusion and how the Mosaic Covenant was temporary and typological, pointing towards Christ.
- Christian Ethics and Governance:
- Explains how Christian ethics should not be enforced through civil law and violence, but rather through persuasion and example.
- Critiques the theonomist perspective that seeks to apply Old Testament civil laws to modern governance.
- Responses to Misunderstandings:
- Clarifies misunderstandings regarding the application of Mosaic Law in the new covenant era.
- Provides biblical references from Hebrews, Colossians, Galatians, and Romans to support his arguments.
- Future Content:
- Teases an upcoming episode focused entirely on covenant theology.
- Encourages audience feedback for further Q&A sessions and potential watch parties for future debates.
Timestamped Outline:
- Introduction to the episode and the unedited debate with Andrew Wilson.
- Explanation of the debate's context and unexpected shift in topics.
- Audience member James questions Jacob on the NAP and God's actions in the Bible.
- Jacob explains the difference between human and divine actions, citing Romans 12.
- Further discussion on Paul's actions in 1 Timothy and 1 Corinthians.
- Explanation of the libertarian perspective on private property and exclusion.
- Jacob addresses the concept of natural law versus the moral standards of the Mosaic Covenant.
- Biblical references supporting the discontinuity between the old and new covenants.
[20:01 - 25:00] Justice and Eschatological Intrusion
- Discussion on justice in the Old Testament and God's prerogative to command judgment.
- Explanation of eschatological intrusion and its significance.
- Jacob elaborates on why Christians are not called to use force to enforce moral behavior.
- Critique of theonomist arguments and the role of civil governance in Christian ethics.
- Responding to a hypothetical about a centralized Christian government enforcing ethics.
- Explanation of why such a government is not feasible before the eschaton.
- Clarification on the punishment of the Canaanites and natural law.
- Explanation of God's judgment and the non-violation of the NAP.
- Introduction to covenant theology and its biblical foundations.
- Discussion on historical theological perspectives supporting covenant theology.
- Summary of key points discussed in the episode.
- Announcement of future content on covenant theology and potential watch parties for debates.
Additional Resources