WEBVTT

00:00:03.130 --> 00:00:06.000
Matt Abrahams: This Tech Tools miniseries
is brought to you by Prezi, the

00:00:06.000 --> 00:00:10.110
presentation tool that makes your ideas
easy to follow, hard to forget, and

00:00:10.110 --> 00:00:12.605
faster than ever to create with Prezi AI.

00:00:13.860 --> 00:00:17.400
The best investment is in
the tools of one's own trade.

00:00:17.550 --> 00:00:20.325
At Think Fast Talk Smart, we are
taking this quote by Benjamin

00:00:20.325 --> 00:00:24.330
Franklin, the famous US inventor
and founding father, very seriously.

00:00:24.570 --> 00:00:28.950
As you know, our show strives to share
tips and techniques to help you hone and

00:00:28.950 --> 00:00:31.260
improve your communication and careers.

00:00:31.530 --> 00:00:35.790
These practices and approaches can be
augmented with tools and technology.

00:00:36.150 --> 00:00:37.200
I'm Matt Abrahams.

00:00:37.290 --> 00:00:40.620
I teach strategic communication at
Stanford Graduate School of Business.

00:00:40.950 --> 00:00:46.080
Welcome to this Tech Tools miniseries
of Think Fast Talk Smart, the podcast.

00:00:46.710 --> 00:00:50.850
In this multi-part miniseries, we'll
introduce you to tools we use at Think

00:00:50.850 --> 00:00:55.530
Fast Talk Smart to help us be better at
our spoken and written communication.

00:00:56.100 --> 00:00:59.400
And you'll learn best practices
from the founders who created them.

00:00:59.730 --> 00:01:03.270
Taken together, we hope these
communication tools will help you find

00:01:03.270 --> 00:01:06.030
new ways to think fast and talk smart.

00:01:06.720 --> 00:01:10.740
I'm excited to speak today with Joe
Thomas, who's one of the founders and

00:01:10.740 --> 00:01:13.740
the CEO of Loom, now part of Atlassian.

00:01:14.009 --> 00:01:14.970
Well, Joe, welcome.

00:01:14.970 --> 00:01:16.110
Thanks for joining me.

00:01:16.500 --> 00:01:18.179
Joe Thomas: Thank you so
much for having me, Matt.

00:01:18.240 --> 00:01:21.720
Matt Abrahams: Some of our listeners
might not know exactly what Loom is.

00:01:22.020 --> 00:01:26.550
Can you share what your product is using
the elevator pitch structure that I teach

00:01:26.550 --> 00:01:33.000
to my MBA students, what if you could,
so that, for example, and that's not all.

00:01:33.240 --> 00:01:33.750
Joe Thomas: Certainly.

00:01:33.930 --> 00:01:40.290
So what if you could record a quick video
showing your screen, including a camera

00:01:40.290 --> 00:01:45.090
bubble, where the video is instantly
ready to share, to communicate complex

00:01:45.090 --> 00:01:50.640
ideas with anyone anytime, so that you
can save time, reduce misunderstandings,

00:01:50.700 --> 00:01:55.065
and build stronger connections with
your team, no matter their availability

00:01:55.185 --> 00:01:56.295
or where they are in the world.

00:01:56.565 --> 00:02:00.405
For example, with Loom, instead of
typing out a long note to explain a

00:02:00.405 --> 00:02:04.305
project or walk through a slide deck
live in a meeting, you can record a

00:02:04.305 --> 00:02:06.914
video for your team to move work forward.

00:02:07.305 --> 00:02:09.884
Over ten million Loom
videos are shared per month.

00:02:10.125 --> 00:02:10.965
And that's not all.

00:02:11.265 --> 00:02:16.065
Loom utilizes AI to transcribe your
video and auto draft a relevant title,

00:02:16.395 --> 00:02:20.715
summary, chapters, and action items,
including helping you polish the video,

00:02:20.715 --> 00:02:25.365
removing filler words and silences so you
can communicate even more effectively.

00:02:25.695 --> 00:02:27.285
No video editing skills required.

00:02:27.345 --> 00:02:30.825
Matt Abrahams: That was very well
done in that structure and very clear.

00:02:30.945 --> 00:02:33.465
I'm curious, what led you to create Loom?

00:02:33.705 --> 00:02:37.905
Joe Thomas: When we were starting out
in 2015, myself and two co-founders,

00:02:37.905 --> 00:02:43.245
what we observed was that video was
everywhere in our personal lives from

00:02:43.245 --> 00:02:45.255
a consumer landscape perspective.

00:02:45.645 --> 00:02:49.230
But when we would show up
to work, video recording and

00:02:49.230 --> 00:02:50.790
sharing was nowhere to be seen.

00:02:50.850 --> 00:02:55.440
Where I was working at the time, we were
still using Microsoft Outlook for emails.

00:02:55.440 --> 00:02:58.200
Slack was just starting to become a thing.

00:02:58.620 --> 00:03:03.704
When we looked at what the existing
software and offerings provided,

00:03:03.885 --> 00:03:06.015
it was really complex to use.

00:03:06.045 --> 00:03:09.615
You would record a video, it would
save a local file on your desktop.

00:03:09.945 --> 00:03:13.125
You had an app to upload it
to Dropbox or Google Drive.

00:03:13.125 --> 00:03:16.745
By the time you were ready to actually
share a link, it had already been twenty,

00:03:16.745 --> 00:03:20.144
twenty-five minutes, and we felt like
there was a ton of latent potential

00:03:20.144 --> 00:03:23.475
within this space to bring video
recording and sharing to the workplace,

00:03:23.805 --> 00:03:26.985
based off of the fact that consumer
behavior tends to leave the enterprise.

00:03:27.345 --> 00:03:30.915
Now, to be clear, we had a core thesis
of bringing video to the workplace.

00:03:31.335 --> 00:03:35.385
But from November 2015 when we
started building to June of 2016, so

00:03:35.385 --> 00:03:39.015
nine months, we had a couple major
pivots about how we would apply

00:03:39.015 --> 00:03:40.424
it and bring it to the workplace.

00:03:40.605 --> 00:03:44.144
But ultimately, what we've built, and
what we've been building against now

00:03:44.144 --> 00:03:49.095
for nine years, is how do we enable
more people to use async video as

00:03:49.095 --> 00:03:50.535
part of their core communication?

00:03:50.735 --> 00:03:51.515
Matt Abrahams: Thank you for that.

00:03:51.515 --> 00:03:55.275
And one of the big powers of what you've
created is that it is asynchronous.

00:03:55.305 --> 00:03:56.705
You don't have to be in live connection.

00:03:56.705 --> 00:03:59.975
Many of us, thanks to the pandemic,
are very familiar with synchronous

00:03:59.975 --> 00:04:04.535
communication, but the tool allows you to
do this asynchronously and provide very

00:04:04.535 --> 00:04:07.115
specific videos for people to leverage.

00:04:07.515 --> 00:04:11.745
Now I know beyond just really thinking
about bringing video to the enterprise,

00:04:11.745 --> 00:04:16.245
you spend a lot of time thinking
about how to integrate videos into

00:04:16.245 --> 00:04:18.075
our work life and our workflows.

00:04:18.404 --> 00:04:22.995
What best practices have you learned that
can really help people be more effective

00:04:22.995 --> 00:04:24.745
at integrating video into what they do?

00:04:25.349 --> 00:04:29.460
Joe Thomas: It's funny 'cause in listening
to this podcast and other episodes,

00:04:29.490 --> 00:04:34.260
I feel like a lot of things end up
being consistent in terms of what is

00:04:34.320 --> 00:04:36.570
good ways to use asynchronous video.

00:04:36.630 --> 00:04:40.710
And one of those is, you already talked
about it, which is show, don't tell.

00:04:40.770 --> 00:04:44.610
I think one of the things about Loom
is that ninety-three percent of videos

00:04:44.610 --> 00:04:48.030
that are recorded on our platform,
they have a screen component to them.

00:04:48.240 --> 00:04:49.650
They're not just talking heads.

00:04:49.860 --> 00:04:54.025
And that allows people to show
their work, not just tell about it.

00:04:54.145 --> 00:04:55.705
There's also, keep it concise.

00:04:55.975 --> 00:05:01.645
We actually have a feature on our free
tier of loom that is a five minute limit,

00:05:01.765 --> 00:05:04.645
and we have had a lot of people talk
about the fact that it should be a paid

00:05:04.645 --> 00:05:06.745
feature to implement a recording limit.

00:05:06.805 --> 00:05:09.895
And then the third thing that I
think about is being authentic.

00:05:10.245 --> 00:05:15.165
The thing about recording video and
sending it is that you can watch it back.

00:05:15.165 --> 00:05:19.125
You can hear your own voice, you can know
the stumbles and say, I can rerecord that.

00:05:19.125 --> 00:05:20.385
I might be able to do it better.

00:05:20.625 --> 00:05:24.195
But in a meeting, you can't go back,
in a face-to-face conversation,

00:05:24.195 --> 00:05:25.905
you can't go back in time, right?

00:05:25.905 --> 00:05:28.965
And so just be authentic and
lean into that authenticity.

00:05:28.965 --> 00:05:32.235
And that's what really resonates
and builds trust with people.

00:05:32.414 --> 00:05:36.045
And the last thing that I'd say with
async video is that even though we're

00:05:36.045 --> 00:05:41.145
bringing consumer behavior to the
workplace, it is still a new skill for

00:05:41.145 --> 00:05:46.005
a lot of people to record and share
video as a form of communication.

00:05:46.275 --> 00:05:50.805
And so just think of async video
as a skill that you can build and

00:05:50.805 --> 00:05:52.030
develop over the course of time.

00:05:52.710 --> 00:05:57.360
We actually have had many users and
customers write into us that they

00:05:57.600 --> 00:06:00.840
started using Loom and because it
was the only consistent way that

00:06:00.840 --> 00:06:04.950
they've ever heard themselves played
back, that they've improved their

00:06:04.950 --> 00:06:09.120
communication as a result of just
clicking play on themselves, no matter

00:06:09.120 --> 00:06:11.535
how painful it is, because pain is gain.

00:06:11.585 --> 00:06:13.865
And so just think of
async video as a skill.

00:06:14.165 --> 00:06:17.495
Matt Abrahams: Taking the time to
watch yourself is perhaps the best

00:06:17.495 --> 00:06:19.535
way to improve communication skills.

00:06:19.655 --> 00:06:23.735
And with a tool like yours, it allows
you the opportunity to try slightly

00:06:23.735 --> 00:06:27.245
different variations and compare
them literally side by side so you

00:06:27.245 --> 00:06:29.135
can see how that looks different.

00:06:29.135 --> 00:06:32.105
I tell people this is like going
to the dentist, and I do not mean

00:06:32.105 --> 00:06:34.415
offense to anybody who is a dentist.

00:06:34.415 --> 00:06:35.525
My uncle was a dentist.

00:06:35.715 --> 00:06:38.805
A lot of us don't like going to the
dentist, but we're super glad we went.

00:06:38.865 --> 00:06:41.085
Some of what you're talking
about is exactly that.

00:06:41.145 --> 00:06:44.235
Take the time to record
yourself, watch that recording.

00:06:44.325 --> 00:06:47.895
As Joe said, it is a skill and it
is a skill that you can develop.

00:06:47.895 --> 00:06:52.575
All athletes watch their videos, coaches
use those videos to help the athletes.

00:06:52.575 --> 00:06:53.385
It's a great skill.

00:06:53.620 --> 00:06:56.260
The notion of focusing on
showing really valuable.

00:06:56.260 --> 00:06:59.590
I think it's fascinating that over
ninety percent of the folks that

00:06:59.590 --> 00:07:03.310
use your tool have something else
on the screen besides just them.

00:07:03.490 --> 00:07:05.920
That shows you how much
people are using it to show.

00:07:06.190 --> 00:07:07.540
Being concise and clear.

00:07:07.540 --> 00:07:10.240
I love that you have a feature,
I wish we could build that

00:07:10.240 --> 00:07:11.980
into everyday interaction.

00:07:12.220 --> 00:07:13.030
Wouldn't that be great?

00:07:13.120 --> 00:07:14.680
And then finally, be who you are.

00:07:14.770 --> 00:07:15.400
Be authentic.

00:07:15.400 --> 00:07:19.000
You don't have to put filters on and
be somebody or not when you do this.

00:07:19.000 --> 00:07:20.320
That authenticity matters.

00:07:21.690 --> 00:07:25.320
Before we end, I'd like to ask you
two questions that I'm asking everyone

00:07:25.320 --> 00:07:29.789
who's part of this miniseries, who
is a communicator you admire and why?

00:07:30.030 --> 00:07:35.429
Joe Thomas: This is gonna be a basic
answer in the sense that, look, Steve

00:07:35.429 --> 00:07:41.190
Jobs I, I think he is undeniable, but I
wanted to call out not just his keynotes.

00:07:41.400 --> 00:07:45.539
I think that the recordings that I'd
go back to on a very regular basis

00:07:45.539 --> 00:07:51.025
are the informal Q&As that he's done
with Apple employees, where I find

00:07:51.025 --> 00:07:53.725
it really fascinating to study those.

00:07:53.785 --> 00:07:59.065
And Mike, the CEO of Atlassian does
something very similar to Steve in

00:07:59.065 --> 00:08:03.085
our town halls where he'll pause
and he'll really think about an

00:08:03.085 --> 00:08:08.215
answer for ten, fifteen seconds,
which seems like an eternity, right?

00:08:08.395 --> 00:08:14.565
But that allows him to shape the
communication in his head such that

00:08:14.565 --> 00:08:19.335
it is thoughtful, but it is also
not skirting around what the real

00:08:19.335 --> 00:08:21.424
answer is, like the no BS answer.

00:08:21.465 --> 00:08:24.855
And so I feel like Steve Jobs
was truly excellent at that.

00:08:25.155 --> 00:08:28.215
Many of us, when we think of Steve
Jobs, we think of those big keynotes

00:08:28.215 --> 00:08:32.085
or the amazing address he gave at
Stanford's graduation many years ago.

00:08:32.355 --> 00:08:35.475
But in fact, he was also
pretty expert at the Q&A piece.

00:08:35.475 --> 00:08:39.554
And that's where I really think the rubber
meets the road because you can prepare and

00:08:39.554 --> 00:08:43.720
practice and have a lot of help in those
planned communications, but in those on

00:08:43.720 --> 00:08:45.819
the spot moments, that's a lot harder.

00:08:46.180 --> 00:08:47.560
Second and final question.

00:08:47.650 --> 00:08:53.199
Beyond Loom your tool, what is
one communication hack or tool or

00:08:53.199 --> 00:08:57.310
shortcut that you use personally
to help you be more effective?

00:08:57.690 --> 00:09:02.670
So this one is probably more for
managers and leaders, but when I

00:09:02.670 --> 00:09:07.440
actually adopted it, it was incredibly
helpful for me in order to reduce my

00:09:07.440 --> 00:09:09.390
anxiety in communicating with a team.

00:09:09.720 --> 00:09:11.880
It's a framework called do, try, consider.

00:09:12.000 --> 00:09:15.870
A lot of times when you're communicating
things to your team, especially if

00:09:15.870 --> 00:09:21.570
you're in a position of authority, if
you don't frame what your message is

00:09:21.570 --> 00:09:25.530
to them through, do, try, consider,
they're all gonna take it as gospel.

00:09:25.560 --> 00:09:26.730
Like, we need to go off and do this.

00:09:27.569 --> 00:09:31.260
So when somebody finally introduced
to me three years ago, this, do try,

00:09:31.260 --> 00:09:36.464
consider framework, it actually radically
changed my ability to share feedback

00:09:36.615 --> 00:09:39.974
in a higher volume while also knowing
that I trust that it's not gonna

00:09:39.974 --> 00:09:41.295
be misconstrued on the other side.

00:09:41.295 --> 00:09:45.375
So, do in this scenario, is used
extremely rarely, at least for

00:09:45.375 --> 00:09:49.035
myself personally, which is I have
extremely high conviction on this.

00:09:49.185 --> 00:09:51.464
I am asking you to do this, right?

00:09:51.464 --> 00:09:53.385
Like this, this isn't a try or consider.

00:09:53.385 --> 00:09:56.265
Try is if it's a design concept.

00:09:56.510 --> 00:09:59.630
I'm not saying that this is a thing that
we're gonna ship, but I would love for

00:09:59.630 --> 00:10:04.370
you to experiment and tinker with the
designs in this way, and then we can come

00:10:04.370 --> 00:10:05.900
back and have a conversation about it.

00:10:06.080 --> 00:10:09.740
And then consider is used eighty to
eighty-five percent of the time, which

00:10:09.740 --> 00:10:11.750
is just, hey, this is a random thought.

00:10:11.960 --> 00:10:13.700
I think it's relevant, but I don't know.

00:10:13.730 --> 00:10:17.060
You're the owner of your work and you
need to take it as like just another

00:10:17.060 --> 00:10:20.349
data point relative to all of the
other things that you're considering.

00:10:20.650 --> 00:10:25.209
And so that was a huge communication
hack for me as a leader, is making sure

00:10:25.209 --> 00:10:29.229
that I communicate whether this is a do,
try, consider to make sure that something

00:10:29.229 --> 00:10:33.250
that was a consider wasn't taken and
come back three months later and I'm

00:10:33.250 --> 00:10:35.155
like, oh no, I forgot I even said that.

00:10:35.660 --> 00:10:37.280
Matt Abrahams: I really appreciate
not only you sharing that,

00:10:37.280 --> 00:10:39.140
but also teaching that to us.

00:10:39.350 --> 00:10:42.140
And you're right, many leaders
when they will say things, people

00:10:42.140 --> 00:10:46.040
take it as a do, when in fact it
was meant as a try or consider.

00:10:46.100 --> 00:10:50.360
It's the preamble that you give to your
comment that helps people understand

00:10:50.360 --> 00:10:52.580
this is a try, this is a consider.

00:10:52.850 --> 00:10:55.670
And the fact that we look at
our thoughts as leaders and even

00:10:55.670 --> 00:10:59.960
colleagues, I would argue as either
do, try, or consider, helps us to

00:10:59.960 --> 00:11:03.260
frame and makes the communication
more clear for the recipient.

00:11:03.740 --> 00:11:04.490
Joe, thank you.

00:11:04.490 --> 00:11:07.130
You know, when I think about it, a
lot of what you're about is helping

00:11:07.130 --> 00:11:09.080
make things clear and easier.

00:11:09.410 --> 00:11:11.060
We are a visual species.

00:11:11.060 --> 00:11:15.560
Seeing things helps us a lot
and Loom, as a tool, is really

00:11:15.560 --> 00:11:16.580
helpful for us doing that.

00:11:16.580 --> 00:11:19.190
Thank you for your time and thank
you for sharing your insights

00:11:19.190 --> 00:11:20.630
and background story of the tool.

00:11:20.970 --> 00:11:23.850
Joe Thomas: Matt, thank you for creating
this podcast in the first place.

00:11:24.030 --> 00:11:26.219
So, so helpful, and thank
you for having me on.

00:11:28.589 --> 00:11:30.030
Matt Abrahams: Thank you for
joining us for one of our

00:11:30.030 --> 00:11:34.110
communication tools episodes of
Think Fast Talk Smart, the podcast.

00:11:34.500 --> 00:11:37.920
Please be sure to listen to all of
the episodes in this miniseries.

00:11:38.160 --> 00:11:41.310
We appreciate Prezis
sponsorship of these episodes.

00:11:41.880 --> 00:11:47.160
This episode was produced by Katherine
Reed, Ryan Campos, and me, Matt Abrahams.

00:11:47.460 --> 00:11:49.020
Our music is from Floyd Wonder.

00:11:49.079 --> 00:11:51.480
With special thanks to
Podium Podcast Company.

00:11:51.870 --> 00:11:55.199
Please find us on YouTube and
wherever you get your podcasts.

00:11:55.439 --> 00:11:57.480
Be sure to subscribe and rate us.

00:11:57.780 --> 00:12:03.310
Follow us on LinkedIn, TikTok, and
Instagram, and check out fastersmarter.io

00:12:03.329 --> 00:12:07.615
for deep dive videos, English language
learning content, and our newsletter.

00:12:08.005 --> 00:12:11.484
Please consider our premium offering
for extended Deep Thinks episodes,

00:12:11.604 --> 00:12:17.074
Ask Matt Anythings, and much
more at fastersmarter.io/premium.