In this episode of New Housing Alternatives, hosts Cherise Burda and Dr. Ren Thomas speak with Anne Gordon-Tighe, strategist at Y Station, a communications and research firm that works with governments, non‑profits, and housing providers. Anne explains how Y Station bridges the gap between quantitative public opinion research and qualitative public engagement, helping clients navigate contentious conversations around new affordable and supportive housing.
Anne traces Y Station’s origins and name back to “Y stations” in the Second World War—radio towers that picked up signals and relayed them to code‑breakers at Bletchley Park. She uses this metaphor to describe how Y Station gathers signals from surveys, stakeholder interviews, and public meetings to give clients a holistic view of the “public conversation” around housing. For many non‑profit providers stepping into development for the first time, this support is critical: they are already stretched thin operating shelters and services, and often lack in‑house capacity to manage complex engagement and communications requirements tied to land sales and development approvals.
The conversation then turns to the myths, fears, and human rights questions that surface when new affordable housing is proposed. Anne outlines common community concerns about property values, crime, and the loss of existing uses like parks, and contrasts these with neutral or supportive residents who simply want information. She describes Y Station’s approach to balancing radical transparency—including around contentious elements like harm reduction services—with a firm commitment to tenants’ rights. As she puts it, we don’t get to decide who our current neighbours have over as guests or what medications they take, and the same standard should apply to residents of affordable and supportive housing.
From there, Cherise and Ren dig into what makes engagement effective—and why it often starts too late. Anne shares examples of humanizing strategies, including inviting prospective tenants into design workshops and using stories and data from existing sites to counter NIMBY narratives. She emphasizes the importance of proactive, non‑project‑based conversations led by municipal and community leaders, rather than placing the full burden on housing providers once a specific development is already on the table. The episode closes by contrasting the evolving approach of larger cities like Edmonton with the political dynamics of smaller municipalities, and by highlighting tools like good neighbour agreements, ongoing relationship‑building, and better data collection as ways to set both projects and future residents up for long‑term success.
Key Takeaways
Chapters00:00 – Intro: New Housing Alternatives and this episode’s focus
00:20 – Introducing guest: strategist and facilitator Anne Gordon Tai
00:43 – What Y Station does: bridging research and public engagement
02:04 – The WWII “Y stations” origin story behind the firm’s name
03:13 – Quantitative research vs. qualitative engagement—and why they’re siloed
04:38 – How Y Station supports non‑profit affordable housing developers
06:53 – Common community concerns: property values, crime myths, and losing parks
08:45 – Human rights, tenant privacy, and what neighbours don’t get to decide
09:59 – Humanizing engagement: involving prospective tenants and sharing stories
12:31 – Urban vs. suburban/small‑town attitudes toward change and new housing
14:10 – Why project‑based engagement comes too late in the public conversation
15:47 – Who should lead broader housing education: elected officials and community leaders
16:50 – The role of municipalities vs. affordable housing providers in public engagement
18:28 – Using data (property values, 911 calls) to counter myths about affordable housing
20:00 – Good neighbour agreements and ongoing community relations
21:47 – How municipal politics differ between big cities and smaller communities
25:31 – Final reflections on public engagement as foundation for successful tenancies
26:27 – Episode wrap‑up, resources, and thanks to our guest
New Housing Alternatives is made possible with the support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. Explore our Vision & Objectives, Research Clusters & Projects, and subscribe to our blog at:
https://newhousingalternatives.ca/blog