{
  "version": "1.2.0",
  "chapters": [
    {
      "title": "Cold Open\r",
      "startTime": 0,
      "endTime": 46
    },
    {
      "title": "Who's Hugh White?\r",
      "startTime": 46,
      "endTime": 85
    },
    {
      "title": "US dominance is already gone and had been fading for years\r",
      "startTime": 85,
      "endTime": 204
    },
    {
      "title": "US dominance is the weird aberration\r",
      "startTime": 204,
      "endTime": 768
    },
    {
      "title": "Why did the US bother to stay involved after the Cold War?\r",
      "startTime": 768,
      "endTime": 1368
    },
    {
      "title": "Does the US think it's accepting a multipolar global order?\r",
      "startTime": 1368,
      "endTime": 2126
    },
    {
      "title": "How Trump has significantly brought forward the inevitable\r",
      "startTime": 2126,
      "endTime": 2505
    },
    {
      "title": "Are Trump and Rubio explicitly in favour of this multipolar outcome?\r",
      "startTime": 2505,
      "endTime": 2642
    },
    {
      "title": "Trump is half-right that the US was being ripped off\r",
      "startTime": 2642,
      "endTime": 2902
    },
    {
      "title": "It doesn't matter if the next president feels differently\r",
      "startTime": 2902,
      "endTime": 3247
    },
    {
      "title": "China's population is shrinking, but that doesn't change much\r",
      "startTime": 3247,
      "endTime": 3818
    },
    {
      "title": "Why Hugh disagrees with other realists like Mearsheimer\r",
      "startTime": 3818,
      "endTime": 4093
    },
    {
      "title": "Could the US be persuaded to spend 2x defence to stay dominant?\r",
      "startTime": 4093,
      "endTime": 4411
    },
    {
      "title": "A multipolar world is bad, but better than the alternative: nuclear war\r",
      "startTime": 4411,
      "endTime": 4721
    },
    {
      "title": "Will the US invade Panama? Greenland? Canada?!\r",
      "startTime": 4721,
      "endTime": 5131
    },
    {
      "title": "Will the US turn the screws and start exploiting nearby countries?\r",
      "startTime": 5131,
      "endTime": 5310
    },
    {
      "title": "What should everyone else do to protect themselves in this new world?\r",
      "startTime": 5310,
      "endTime": 5758
    },
    {
      "title": "Europe is strong enough to take on Russia, except it lacks nuclear deterrence\r",
      "startTime": 5758,
      "endTime": 6014
    },
    {
      "title": "The EU will probably build European nuclear weapons\r",
      "startTime": 6014,
      "endTime": 6284
    },
    {
      "title": "Cancel some orders of US fighter planes\r",
      "startTime": 6284,
      "endTime": 6583
    },
    {
      "title": "Taiwan is screwed\r",
      "startTime": 6583,
      "endTime": 6910
    },
    {
      "title": "Wouldn't the US defend Taiwan for its AI chips?\r",
      "startTime": 6910,
      "endTime": 7203
    },
    {
      "title": "South Korea has to go nuclear\r",
      "startTime": 7203,
      "endTime": 7439
    },
    {
      "title": "Japan will go nuclear, but can't be a regional leader\r",
      "startTime": 7439,
      "endTime": 7650
    },
    {
      "title": "Australia is defensible but needs a totally different military\r",
      "startTime": 7650,
      "endTime": 7913
    },
    {
      "title": "Countries will mostly rise to the challenge\r",
      "startTime": 7913,
      "endTime": 7983
    },
    {
      "title": "AGI may or may not overcome existing nuclear deterrence\r",
      "startTime": 7983,
      "endTime": 8997
    },
    {
      "title": "How right is realism?\r",
      "startTime": 8997,
      "endTime": 9345
    },
    {
      "title": "Has a country ever gone to war over pure morality?\r",
      "startTime": 9345,
      "endTime": 9604
    },
    {
      "title": "Hugh's message for Americans\r",
      "startTime": 9604,
      "endTime": 9744
    },
    {
      "title": "Addendum: Why America temporarily stopped being isolationist",
      "startTime": 9744,
      "endTime": 0
    }
  ]
}