PJ is joined once again by Dr. Lewis Gordon. Together, they talk about Karl Jaspers, loving your country, and race.
Who thinks that they can subdue Leviathan? Strength resides in its neck; dismay goes before it. It is without fear. It looks down on all who are haughty; it is king over all who are proud. These words inspired PJ Wehry to create Chasing Leviathan. Chasing Leviathan was born out of two ideals: that truth is worth pursuing but will never be subjugated, and the discipline of listening is one of the most important habits anyone can develop. Every episode is a dialogue, a journey into the depths of a meaningful question explored through the lens of personal experience or professional expertise.
[pj_wehry]: Is it Um, Doctor Cahndda, I'm probably saying his name wrong, uh,
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, Henda Andrews,
[pj_wehry]: yeahda, Andnder Andrews, Yes, uh,
[pj_wehry]: but I saw uh, your uh, webon R with him and uh, now that I've read your book, I'm
[pj_wehry]: like. Of course, I see Fannon in the background, right.
[pj_wehry]: I like. I. I, A lot. A lot of the choices are are making sense. um,
[lewis_gordon]: excuse me, Mhm. Yeah.
[pj_wehry]: uh, y. You know, I'm not a huge fan. I don't want to do the gotcha thing. Um,
[pj_wehry]: I do want to mention the podcast that I'm a a devout Christian, not, uh, because
[pj_wehry]: I'm
[lewis_gordon]: what. what's wrong with that?
[pj_wehry]: nothing. nothing. Uh, yeah, like
[lewis_gordon]: Oh good.
[pj_wehry]: and no, No, like the reason I want to mention it is, um, just uh. what I don't
[pj_wehry]: want to do is I don't want to be disenenuous Right And so that it, and maybe it
[pj_wehry]: won't need to come up in the potcast and that would be fine. Uh, just that Yeah, I
[pj_wehry]: know, there's a critique and I think a rightful critique of many forms of
[pj_wehry]: Christianity. And so what I don't want for my listeners is they know that I'm a
[pj_wehry]: devout Christian and for that to be, uh, me hiding hiding that while I'm talking
[pj_wehry]: to you. If that makes sense,
[lewis_gordon]: that totally makes sense. You don't have to hide that.
[pj_wehry]: Yeah, right, right, and I, I don't feel well. That's I. But what I didn't want is
[pj_wehry]: to follow up like you, talk about the critique of Christiandian, and maybe be like
[pj_wehry]: I'm a devout Christian and then you know like there's that whole. You know what
[pj_wehry]: I'm talking about. There's that whole apologetic
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, Yeah,
[pj_wehry]: thing that. To be quite frank was more interesting when I was sixteen, so
[pj_wehry]: if that makes sense,
[lewis_gordon]: but also, but Christianity is a very interesting example, though, Because you
[lewis_gordon]: know, I make a
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: distinction between Constantinian
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: Christianity and
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: it, and a lot of people don't realize that that, Um, for instance, a lot of
[lewis_gordon]: people don't know the early period of Christianity. A lot of the people who
[lewis_gordon]: are very active and prosiz more female,
[pj_wehry]: yeah, yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: and uh. and that um. Constantinian Christianity imposed a for of patriarchal
[lewis_gordon]: structure, And and, and that's one of the reason why you commissioned. I
[lewis_gordon]: forgot the name of the Libraryian in Palestine to um
[pj_wehry]: hm.
[lewis_gordon]: to assemble a canonical set of texts, which actually then pushed away the
[lewis_gordon]: women writers, and uh, but a lot of people don't know that Christianity' a far
[lewis_gordon]: more complex
[pj_wehry]: oh yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: phenomenon, and uh, and in and in the book, I also make a distinction between
[lewis_gordon]: Um, the more ancient Uh, African, um, eastern going
[pj_wehry]: right.
[lewis_gordon]: Christianity, and what happened that split the Mediterranean to create a form
[lewis_gordon]: of Northern Christianities, mediated by Aristotilianism. But, uh, as you
[lewis_gordon]: probably know, I, I was also professor of Forligion, not not only philosophy
[pj_wehry]: oh, I didn't know that. Oh, that's cool.
[lewis_gordon]: and other things.
[lewis_gordon]: Oh, yeah, you. well, I've trained scholars for Phds and relision,
[pj_wehry]: every time
[lewis_gordon]: and uh, that's whyd up.
[pj_wehry]: every time I talk to you, it's like you've lived an entire past life. That like
[pj_wehry]: you, like I was also a jazz musician.
[pj_wehry]: It's really amazing.
[lewis_gordon]: No, No, The one of the funny things about what I do is, I'm a professor
[pj_wehry]: yeah.
[lewis_gordon]: of many things. I've um professor school in dance, phenomenologies of
[lewis_gordon]: movement, Uh, Prof. I, I've done, trained people in from community health
[lewis_gordon]: issues. I've actually uh, um, trainent trained and advised psychologists. Uh,
[lewis_gordon]: do work in psychoanalysis. Uh, it's a broad range of things and in philosophy.
[lewis_gordon]: That's one of the reasons why I say philosophy of human
[pj_wehry]: yeah, yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: sciences to give it a A. A better understanding. But yeah, no, Um, So the the
[lewis_gordon]: problem is one of the. you know, one of the the things about. I like the fact
[lewis_gordon]: that we started talking about Christianity, because I remember many years ago
[lewis_gordon]: when I was teaching, I was giving Um a se a course in the Bible belt. And you
[lewis_gordon]: you figure, if you're in a Bible belt, you know, like in my book, wear big of
[lewis_gordon]: examples from
[pj_wehry]: hm.
[lewis_gordon]: films and so forth, if you're gonna be in an audience that are P. You know
[lewis_gordon]: Christians, And it's the Bible belt. I thought, let me use Biblical examples
[lewis_gordon]: so we could speak. and to my chagrin to my shock, to my horror, none of the
[lewis_gordon]: students read the Bible,
[pj_wehry]: Oh, the Biblical literacy. he is shocking for the Bible belt.
[lewis_gordon]: So so you could imagine why they the looking. That's why. To this day, even
[lewis_gordon]: even when I'm teaching philosophy classes that are not
[pj_wehry]: Yeah, yes,
[lewis_gordon]: philosophy of religion, I actually
[lewis_gordon]: uh, assigned Biblical passages because they need to be Li. they need
[pj_wehry]: yeah, right,
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: to be literate. they need to know. So like even my social ethics class That,
[lewis_gordon]: to be literate. they need to know. So like even my social ethics class That,
[lewis_gordon]: which is a large mega class. I assign a Genesis one in two,
[lewis_gordon]: which is a large mega class. I assign a Genesis one in two,
[pj_wehry]: hm. hm,
[lewis_gordon]: and I signed a Cororanic version, and I also assigned the
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: Tanoch version, which is the You know the Hebrew. I don't like the word Hebrew
[lewis_gordon]: Bible, but the you know,
[pj_wehry]: yes,
[lewis_gordon]: the the torrah and Um, and the students are. it's sucking into this day when
[lewis_gordon]: I'm in an audience of like three hundred or five hundred students.
[lewis_gordon]: many of them including the ones who are
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: Muslims or the ones or are Christians, and you and the minure Jews don't know
[pj_wehry]: yeah, yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: these stories.
[lewis_gordon]: A. And it is the first time they'reginning to read them. So one of the things
[lewis_gordon]: I um do
[lewis_gordon]: is to to introduce them to that and to the
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: complexity of it, because
[lewis_gordon]: a lot of them
[lewis_gordon]: don't understand at this point that if they don't learn to think for
[lewis_gordon]: themselves and read
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: these things these texts, then they're going to be an. If there are
[lewis_gordon]: christians, say who go to church on a Sunday, having some
[pj_wehry]: hm.
[lewis_gordon]: preacher tell them things that are literally not in the text.
[pj_wehry]: oh, Dm, yeah, I mean, I grew up independent Fundamental Baptist and I have moved
[pj_wehry]: quite
[lewis_gordon]: Mhm,
[pj_wehry]: a distance since then, and uh oh, man, the amount of misinformation is
[pj_wehry]: astonishing.
[lewis_gordon]: it's astonish. You're probably just so shocked when you read We reading these
[lewis_gordon]: things. Oh, what?
[pj_wehry]: Oh yeah. oh, I mean,
[pj_wehry]: rock music kills plants, and God is a god of life, so rock music is wrong. I mean,
[pj_wehry]: that was a common
[lewis_gordon]: Mhm,
[pj_wehry]: argument. Um, that's one of my favorites, though, Because it just
[pj_wehry]: it's so. It's so foreign to people right like it doesn't even make sense. Um. I
[pj_wehry]: mean, that's that continual movement. Um is is part of what's led to the this
[pj_wehry]: podcast for me, Right like that, this search in philosophy and in religion, Um,
[pj_wehry]: And it's also been a big part of Uh. Why embodying different modes of knowing is
[pj_wehry]: important for me? Because literally, what started most of this was my love of
[pj_wehry]: literature
[pj_wehry]: and
[lewis_gordon]: Mhm,
[pj_wehry]: I, I was looking at what I was experiencing, literature and the wonder and the the
[pj_wehry]: fantastic nature of it, and I was just um.
[pj_wehry]: I. It wasn't adding up to what I was experiencing.
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, Y. and you know what else that's
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: really striking? There's this false. Th. there are a lot. There are a lot of
[lewis_gordon]: loaded questions, fallacies of false
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: dilemmas, et cetera that are imposed upon looking at the relationship of
[lewis_gordon]: philosophy to religion as an example, and it has led to. so, for instance,
[pj_wehry]: yeah, Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: many, there are many people who study philosophy today who really think
[lewis_gordon]: they're doing some kind of science when they're doing pseudo science. And but,
[lewis_gordon]: but here's the part that's real
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: red Striking many of them make judgments around theology and philosophy and
[lewis_gordon]: not
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: theology and religion. but they have not read the text
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: themselves. so it's hilarious when I look read the works of many s avowedly
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: secular philosophers. And it's they have no idea how much religion is
[lewis_gordon]: informing
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: what they think,
[lewis_gordon]: And a a good example is if you think and say, for instance you know Leviathon
[lewis_gordon]: is is is you
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: know connected to this
[pj_wehry]: sure,
[lewis_gordon]: this meeting
[lewis_gordon]: and mo, many, uh, euro, modern Anglo political
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: philosophers
[lewis_gordon]: imagine that they're completely in their thought independent of theology.
[lewis_gordon]: Okay, so so what they do in
[lewis_gordon]: to to
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: maintain this is often mistranslate. If it's in another language,
[lewis_gordon]: what is clearly a theological or religious concept,
[lewis_gordon]: K, in order to make it fit, so here, so I give you two
[pj_wehry]: yeah, yeah, yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: examples. The first, the first example is let's start with in English,
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: Right, because this is Ra, not a term. If you look at a lot of political
[lewis_gordon]: philosophical arguments and how let's pick somebody like say John ralls,
[lewis_gordon]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: either, because he is the most famous American and your Anglo political
[lewis_gordon]: philosopher,
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: right, Ah, the late John Rolls,
[lewis_gordon]: If you look at his argument in a theory of justice,
[lewis_gordon]: he argues that justice has to be in the deep structure of the society.
[lewis_gordon]: Okay, And then he draws out the principles from those deep structures,
[lewis_gordon]: and then he âultimately, then argues This is how you make the society just in
[pj_wehry]: Mhm, hm,
[lewis_gordon]: relation to
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: those principles.
[lewis_gordon]: those principles.
[lewis_gordon]: Okay, so that doesn't seem religious at all. Okay,
[pj_wehry]: I, I'm curious where you're going to the spy. Have some suspicions. Go ahead,
[lewis_gordon]: that's clearly
[lewis_gordon]: theossy.
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: If you think about the classic
[lewis_gordon]: theodysian argument,
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: Right,
[lewis_gordon]: God is intrinsically
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: good,
[lewis_gordon]: So evil is that which contradicts God. Injustice. Those things right,
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: theod dequ, God's justice. So what you have to do is draw out God's
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: justice and eliminate the contradictions.
[pj_wehry]: yeah. Right, headsight, Yeah, and it's that embedding in the. Um. Kind of. I think
[pj_wehry]: you mentioned this with Cararl Jaspers in your book which pro listeners. That's
[pj_wehry]: today. we're here to talk about fear of black consciousness, which was a
[pj_wehry]: tremendous read. Um, really, In many ways my favorite type of philosophy. Uh,
[pj_wehry]: enjoyable to read, and uh, very challenging. Uh, provoked a lot of thoughts. So
[pj_wehry]: thank you. I appreciate the work you put into
[lewis_gordon]: Oh, thank you.
[pj_wehry]: this. Um, but
[pj_wehry]: um,
[pj_wehry]: sorry, I got caught up in that. the. Uh, oh, you talked about Carl Jaspers, And
[pj_wehry]: and how you know? Atheists might be uncomfortable with this discussion. But the
[pj_wehry]: fact that we have to be responsible beyond ourselves like there's that. that
[pj_wehry]: correlation of like you have to base it in something, and that, as human beings
[pj_wehry]: were too small in many ways to to not have that responsibility outside ourselves.
[pj_wehry]: If that makes sense,
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, yeah, we are when we talk about yspers. Uh, you know, Um, I talk about
[lewis_gordon]: the, for instance, his four characterizations of
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: responsibility,
[lewis_gordon]: But but but very quickly before I go to ospers, The the second
[pj_wehry]: oh yes, absolutely
[lewis_gordon]: example I is going to use was what was Aristotle? If you look at a lot of
[lewis_gordon]: Anglo translations, because it's done by philosophers of Aristotle. When they
[lewis_gordon]: talk about his ethics, they will talk about you,
[pj_wehry]: Mhm, Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: Donia. And, and it's often translated
[pj_wehry]: right.
[lewis_gordon]: as happiness,
[lewis_gordon]: which is absolutely ridiculous.
[pj_wehry]: Is it blessedness?
[lewis_gordon]: but
[lewis_gordon]: that's a better translation.
[pj_wehry]: Yes, it, guess it's Um. it. It's similar to Uh. The be atatitudes right, isn't it?
[pj_wehry]: It's the same word.
[lewis_gordon]: correct.
[lewis_gordon]: And so if you think about it, a lot of Aristotle would suddenly make sense
[lewis_gordon]: Because there are times when you look at a person who has developed
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: good character.
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: All the virtues you look at the person you say, man, you're
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: blessed.
[lewis_gordon]: But, but because they want to issue religious
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: terminology, but you don't say, Wow, you got all
[pj_wehry]: you're happy.
[lewis_gordon]: the virtues. You're happy
[lewis_gordon]: because that that
[pj_wehry]: No, it really doesn't.
[lewis_gordon]: makes no sense, because their times, virtue is not about being happy, Is about
[lewis_gordon]: understanding there times. it's correct. Actually, not to be happy, but to be
[lewis_gordon]: sad. There are times where it's it's proper to be outraged. There are times
[pj_wehry]: H. right.
[lewis_gordon]: where it's proper to be quite concerned about the plight of our planet
[lewis_gordon]: and humankind. That is what a good person is, and it's also some. And then
[lewis_gordon]: there are people who have criticized Aristotle about talking about the
[lewis_gordon]: importance of being born and raised by loving good
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: families. They're like. That's unfair. What if you don't have that? But that's
[lewis_gordon]: the whole point. if you have it. you're blessed.
[pj_wehry]: you're bless us. Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: You know. so so you know? So these are things you notice in the book. I'm not
[lewis_gordon]: afraid of the
[lewis_gordon]: religious language. I actually interrogate them.
[pj_wehry]: Yeah, I noted that
[lewis_gordon]: And and so
[lewis_gordon]: yeah, that's that. So if you go
[pj_wehry]: Mhm.
[lewis_gordon]: to yspers, one of the yspers was very similar. I, you could tell in this book.
[lewis_gordon]: This is not um, a a epistemologically, um, a partate or segregated book, And I
[lewis_gordon]: don't reduce reality and thought to good guys, bad guys. Uh, it's it's It's
[lewis_gordon]: about what humanity's struggling to understand our condition. Ha has
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: to offer, and one of the beautiful things about. Yes, you could probably tell
[lewis_gordon]: He's a person I have high regard for because you know he was a. He was a
[lewis_gordon]: Protestant German,
[lewis_gordon]: Um, who was married to a Jewish German.
[lewis_gordon]: Uh, he studied psychiatry. He, W. he wrote one of the greatest psychiatry
[lewis_gordon]: books ever. Uh. His book at psychophology was influential for more than
[pj_wehry]: Wow, I didn't realize that.
[lewis_gordon]: a century. He, um,
[lewis_gordon]: oh, yeah, he was a physician and any but he loved philosophy, And when he
[lewis_gordon]: decided because in a German system I it, that book was the habilit tasion,
[lewis_gordon]: which meant he could be a professor of medicine, he decided he's going to
[lewis_gordon]: write a book on philosophy,
[lewis_gordon]: and
[lewis_gordon]: the the professional philosophers ridiculed him.
[lewis_gordon]: Like. What are you doing? You're moving in our turf. There're even graduate
[lewis_gordon]: students who go to classes and say this man doesn't know what he's talking
[lewis_gordon]: about, but yspers. You know, he's a psychiatrist. He pays attention, but he
[lewis_gordon]: wrote and he writes a three volume Taxx, called Get This philosophy.
[lewis_gordon]: What are classics? said
[pj_wehry]: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: philosophy right. It's like base, as the hip hop people would say, and becomes
[lewis_gordon]: a mega big professor of philosophy right again against his critics. But the
[lewis_gordon]: thing about yspers is he also respected
[lewis_gordon]: Uh, religious ideas,
[lewis_gordon]: and one of the things that Ysper's
[pj_wehry]: h, mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: um does because you know there' are certain terms that don't work in
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: the German language.
[lewis_gordon]: the German language.
[lewis_gordon]: It's very, because existence is is a Latin term. Y, You're a German at an
[lewis_gordon]: existence in being Are not the same thing in Germany.
[pj_wehry]: right, right,
[lewis_gordon]: Say âzine, So he had to use an neogism existens with a âz to capture to talk
[lewis_gordon]: about human beingcause. You've heard me talk before that a human beings,
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: not a thing. A human being stands out is an activity. So when he saw a human
[lewis_gordon]: beings to
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: existences, so along the way, but yspers. Of course, he's a very
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: courageous man because when as things are happening, Nazi Germany, Uh, he, he
[lewis_gordon]: refused not to teach Jewish students, and Agy continued to Jewish students.
[lewis_gordon]: Anybody
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: else who would come to work with him?
[lewis_gordon]: He stood up to the Nazis. He was being a taced. was just that he's such a
[lewis_gordon]: famous philosopher. They were trying to
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: look good. not taking mind
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: and killing him. But he and his wife had made a decision because it really did
[lewis_gordon]: look like Germany's going to win the war. At one point lot people
[pj_wehry]: yeah.
[lewis_gordon]: don't realize this, Um that they picked a date because he was a physician
[lewis_gordon]: where he and his wife were going to commit suicide in Germany in
[pj_wehry]: oh, wow,
[lewis_gordon]: Berlin, But it's just it's just that the Allies marched in a a few days before
[lewis_gordon]: and it changed everything,
[lewis_gordon]: And so, but, but he was adamantly against the idea of
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: fleeing. He wanted to actually take the position. He had a certain view about
[lewis_gordon]: the obligations
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: to your country if you actually
[lewis_gordon]: love
[pj_wehry]: right
[lewis_gordon]: it,
[lewis_gordon]: and so
[lewis_gordon]: yspers
[lewis_gordon]: after the war. Uhcause, people like Heideer look pretty bad, which is really
[lewis_gordon]: terrible. The way are in the U. S. Academy. They just vaalrize.
[pj_wehry]: know,
[lewis_gordon]: Eiger I. there was a smuck. He was an absolute schmuk and he was a coward, but
[lewis_gordon]: um, but if we look at Yspers, whom they pretty much have written
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: out of literature, whom I consider a far better philosopher. Far more. not
[lewis_gordon]: just idmire him as a
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: courageous human being, but his creativity is breath. Uh, but yspers, Um,
[lewis_gordon]: basically said, look, ah, y, y, give these lectures because he was entrusted
[lewis_gordon]: to rebuild the
[pj_wehry]: hm
[lewis_gordon]: German university.
[lewis_gordon]: Okay, and he says there's a problem, of course, because the German univers is
[lewis_gordon]: dominate by naciism, the
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: right, national Socialism,
[lewis_gordon]: and Uh, and as he was so, he gave a series of lectures And that's what
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: I was talking about, Where he was saying. Look okay. Look,
[lewis_gordon]: first of all,
[lewis_gordon]: Germany is a vanquished country
[lewis_gordon]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: and be given the behavior of Germany in World War Two and the events leading
[lewis_gordon]: up to it.
[lewis_gordon]: there is a serious issue that the people of Germany faced, which is the people
[lewis_gordon]: who have defeated them at the moment,
[lewis_gordon]: has to assess that society in the basis of its
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: behavior.
[lewis_gordon]: This is something to people in the United States
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: face as well, right, because you know, W. you know if if we behave in a way
[lewis_gordon]: that if we were vanquished and people looked at our record,
[lewis_gordon]: have we behaved in a way that would make those people say we deserve
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: mercy,
[lewis_gordon]: That's the question. He was. deal. That's a serious question to talk ere
[pj_wehry]: Oh yes, especially at that time. Yeah, it makes so much more sense in context.
[lewis_gordon]: country
[lewis_gordon]: at that time.
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: So that's what it was And so he says. Well, to understand it, you need to
[lewis_gordon]: understand a kind of responsibilities people bear in a society.
[lewis_gordon]: And so he started with the first one with metaphysical
[pj_wehry]: H.
[lewis_gordon]: responsibility. And that's the. that's the most radically personal. That is
[lewis_gordon]: the responsibility you have in your relationship to God, or if you earn a
[lewis_gordon]: society where your religion is not God save you'.
[pj_wehry]: Mhm, Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: it's Buddhism, right, ah, or âzen, Buddhism. You're real, your responsibility
[lewis_gordon]: to
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: the sacred.
[lewis_gordon]: Okay, but that's âultimately about you, and that relationship then is another
[lewis_gordon]: responsibility,
[lewis_gordon]: the responsibility you have to your fellow human being, which is moral
[lewis_gordon]: responsibility. but it's still pretty much about how you act. O. Okay, it's
[lewis_gordon]: just that, instead of thinking about the absolute relationship to reality,
[lewis_gordon]: it's about your fellow human being,
[lewis_gordon]: and then there's a third, which is the obligations you have to law to to the
[lewis_gordon]: legal system,
[lewis_gordon]: So you may not think you may think certain laws are really stupid, but you'll
[lewis_gordon]: follow them as
[pj_wehry]: right, right,
[lewis_gordon]: a good citizen. And then there's some that you may say are
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: wrong, And that's where you have civil disobedience.
[pj_wehry]: right.
[lewis_gordon]: You defy them. You know that's where you're inn. The Martin Luther King, that
[pj_wehry]: Yes,
[lewis_gordon]: category you know of of being a good human being requires being disobedient to
[pj_wehry]: would you say that that third one? Uh, that civil disobi should stem from the
[lewis_gordon]: the law. K.
[pj_wehry]: first two responsibilities, Right. We don't just break the law because we don't
[pj_wehry]: like something, but because it interferes with those first two responsibilities,
[pj_wehry]: Is that a a good way to think about it? Go ahead,
[lewis_gordon]: Well, this is where well it's getting further. He's
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: getting more. There's more because you see the thing about Yosper's and one
[lewis_gordon]: things I love about him. He's not a
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: reductionistic thinker. You know, some people say it's this
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: versus that, but you notice already we'reing
[pj_wehry]: yes,
[lewis_gordon]: three categories so it's not that simple and you know every human being is
[lewis_gordon]: going to manifest each of em. So then he
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: gets to the fourth, and the fourth is rather
[pj_wehry]: Yes,
[lewis_gordon]: interesting. The fourth he says, is political responsibility,
[lewis_gordon]: you see, and political responsibility,
[lewis_gordon]: he argues,
[lewis_gordon]: is um, a responsibility
[lewis_gordon]: that at an entire society bears
[lewis_gordon]: by virtue of its membership in that society
[lewis_gordon]: right, Everybody in that
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: society bears the reason
[lewis_gordon]: for that one. Excuse me, The reason for that one is because of the situation
[lewis_gordon]: they were in
[lewis_gordon]: when you commit
[pj_wehry]: H,
[lewis_gordon]: harms
[lewis_gordon]: as a society.
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: The entire society's responsible. You can't say well, I didn't vote for him. I
[lewis_gordon]: didn't do it. You know, I mean wheth the Allies and all of them were there.
[pj_wehry]: right, yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: It was Germany under
[pj_wehry]: right
[lewis_gordon]: trial.
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: That was his point. So yes, in relation to your question,
[lewis_gordon]: all of these come into play.
[lewis_gordon]: You see all of them come into play. But the thing about it is that political
[lewis_gordon]: responsibility Yspers points out
[lewis_gordon]: is a situation in which
[lewis_gordon]: um
[lewis_gordon]: the um. Because the entire society is held
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: responsible, Say, for instance, the United States
[lewis_gordon]: is is held accountable and vanquished and is being held accountable for for
[lewis_gordon]: lots of damages done to
[pj_wehry]: Mhm, Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: the rest of the world, right justice, says an example.
[lewis_gordon]: It means that's that. Say, the United States has to pay a sum. Let's us use
[lewis_gordon]: it. in that sense
[lewis_gordon]: at the end of the day. Where is that money going to come from?
[pj_wehry]: it's got to come from the taxpayers right.
[lewis_gordon]: for
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: correct? And that's the point implicit in living in a society is an obligation
[lewis_gordon]: to take on
[pj_wehry]: Hm.
[lewis_gordon]: its debts. And here's a point. It's irrelevant if you are a legal citizen,
[pj_wehry]: interesting,
[lewis_gordon]: a permanent resident.
[lewis_gordon]: Even if you're an undocumented worker,
[lewis_gordon]: you're in that society. Your labor and whatever taxes or resources brought
[lewis_gordon]: from it
[lewis_gordon]: are going to be drawn upon. And that's why, Um,
[lewis_gordon]: and so yoperurs basically says.
[lewis_gordon]: This is why a country has an obligation
[lewis_gordon]: to ask itself. Not only is it doing the right thing, but is it doing it in
[lewis_gordon]: such a way that if others
[lewis_gordon]: were to be judging
[pj_wehry]: Mhm, Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: that country
[lewis_gordon]: that they could say they tried their best and they deserve
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: mercy,
[lewis_gordon]: And that's a complicated issue. And this is, you could probably guess where I
[lewis_gordon]: was going with this. Because it it it it, It gets into the stupid argument
[lewis_gordon]: people always bring up when we talk about reparations in the United States.
[lewis_gordon]: They think it's like about individual white people getting up and giving money
[lewis_gordon]: to individual black people. It's it's the stupidest caricature of the whole
[lewis_gordon]: thing, because first of all, black people pay taxes, Native Americans play
[lewis_gordon]: taxes, pay taxes,
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: you know what I mean, and it's not just the taxes. Lots of other things. it's
[lewis_gordon]: about the citizens. it's about the people of a society taking on
[lewis_gordon]: responsibility for
[pj_wehry]: Yeah, yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: its debts, And that's what Yspers
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: was saying. That's when you now come
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: political, the you can go in a courtroom to deal with civil suits. An
[lewis_gordon]: individual who's in with
[pj_wehry]: Mhm, Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: another individual. you could have a. A. A cop may pull you over. say you know
[lewis_gordon]: if it's a non racist situation and say, Look, you are breaking a speed limit.
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: Here is your ticket. If you, you can contest it and go to court. That's still
[lewis_gordon]: an
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: individual.
[lewis_gordon]: But if systematically, one is going to have a whole system with sundown laws
[lewis_gordon]: and ways of blocking people's movement and their their tax buddies, be used
[lewis_gordon]: against them and everybody to create a society of in E, To
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: fix that
[lewis_gordon]: everybody is
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: responsible and that's a crucial element. Everybody is
[lewis_gordon]: responsible for it when it's a political
[pj_wehry]: and I think
[pj_wehry]: yes and I, I think it's just to go alongside. There is a passage where you talk
[lewis_gordon]: responsibilityt.
[pj_wehry]: about Um, this idea of getting moral and political guilt confused, which I think
[pj_wehry]: you make earlier on in the book, And then you. You kind of fulfil that in your
[pj_wehry]: discussion of Yspers,
[pj_wehry]: Yes, and I, D, and I found that S
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah,
[pj_wehry]: very helpful. Um, y, and you do that at several key points in the book and I, I
[pj_wehry]: found it
[pj_wehry]: uh, so, uh, illuminating. and it' just really helpful too. Uh, When you talked
[pj_wehry]: about how people won't talk, they only talk about race and bad faith. Because I've
[pj_wehry]: tried to have conversations about race and eventually there's just this weird it.
[pj_wehry]: Somehow, it always veers off course and I can't figure out why, And and a lot of
[pj_wehry]: it comes down to that people aren't willing to talk about the actual concepts
[pj_wehry]: themselves. Um, one that. I also was really helpful for me, was your analysis of
[pj_wehry]: white privilege and the way that white privilege has been used as a blanket term
[pj_wehry]: to cover really two very different kinds of things, neither of which we would call
[pj_wehry]: privileges right. And that's rights and
[lewis_gordon]: yep.
[pj_wehry]: license. And that was so helpful because I have found that kind of covering in
[pj_wehry]: discussion where it's like. Well, I'm confused because they're like. Oh, it's
[pj_wehry]: white privilege to have, So you know, have food, shelter and safety, and I'm like
[pj_wehry]: it doesn't feel like. You know what
[lewis_gordon]: oh yeah,
[pj_wehry]: I mean Like doesn't feel that you know you're like, uh, I mean in talking in terms
[pj_wehry]: of like, um, not being harassed by the police. for instance, like you know safety
[pj_wehry]: from, and like, it doesn't feel like a privilege. Right that? That feels like
[pj_wehry]: something you
[lewis_gordon]: that's
[pj_wehry]: should have. like I should be all right.
[lewis_gordon]: that's correct. In fact, yeah, people who pick up the Bu didn't see that one
[lewis_gordon]: coming right. And
[lewis_gordon]: this is there is a way that black authors look like to get stereotyped. But
[lewis_gordon]: but a lot. but the truth is there a lot of black authors and
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: white authors who are invested in that problematic
[pj_wehry]: h.
[lewis_gordon]: concept. But yeah, the the bottom line, the issue isn't that white people have
[lewis_gordon]: those things. The issue is that we have a. A. a system
[lewis_gordon]: of Um. The distribution of resources that blocks a lot of other people from
[lewis_gordon]: having what every human
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: being should have, every human being should have access education, health care
[lewis_gordon]: goods, you know, um, safety, you know, uh, uh, fairness on the legal systems,
[lewis_gordon]: the list is
[pj_wehry]: yes,
[lewis_gordon]: long, but these are things that everyone should have, But to tell, it's
[lewis_gordon]: bizarre to tell you. I mean, what are you supposed to do? You're supposed to
[lewis_gordon]: be feel, Can you? should you really tell a a, a white person you shouldn't
[lewis_gordon]: have
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: that? I mean, that makes no sense. The other thing, too, is it slides into a
[lewis_gordon]: perverse morralism, because if you think about it, it just comes down to
[lewis_gordon]: saying Okay for the white person to acknowledge the white privilege. Okay,
[lewis_gordon]: then the person says Okay, I'm I'm I'm a bad white person. I have a a white
[lewis_gordon]: privilege and then they go home to a society that stays
[pj_wehry]: yes, yes,
[lewis_gordon]: intact. No change
[lewis_gordon]: that that doesn't resolve. So my criticis,
[pj_wehry]: and get to feel morally superior.
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, because at least I'm
[pj_wehry]: Yes,
[lewis_gordon]: not like other whites now Now. The So I, I find that
[pj_wehry]: right, right,
[lewis_gordon]: despicable. Uh, what I? what? I? what I? I. I hold no punches on that
[pj_wehry]: No, you don't.
[lewis_gordon]: in a book, but um,
[lewis_gordon]: but but one of the things, there's several things I do point out that we
[lewis_gordon]: should bear. Mind you see, this is there. There are people who wanna so
[lewis_gordon]: individualize a political
[pj_wehry]: Hm.
[lewis_gordon]: issue that it creates a kind of narcissm like their God's individual. You
[lewis_gordon]: could handle it, which is one of the reasons when we talk about racism. there
[lewis_gordon]: are many people who take it
[pj_wehry]: H.
[lewis_gordon]: personally
[lewis_gordon]: because you know it's just like if you're talking about sexism, you and I are
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: males.
[lewis_gordon]: Uh, they' they're We have seen males who are not interested in the problem of
[lewis_gordon]: sexism. They just want women to say they're not a
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: sexist male. That that's
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: narcism The right. Well, so we need. It's something where we do what a
[lewis_gordon]: political issue had on, and to do that we need to have the way yspers talked
[lewis_gordon]: about, but many others that we need to have something where people can
[lewis_gordon]: collaboratively do something. Now If we pick the license example, The prompt.
[lewis_gordon]: The difference between a license or privilege. This sentence makes no sense. I
[lewis_gordon]: have the privilege of murdering you.
[lewis_gordon]: That makes no sense. I have the privilege of stealing from you from
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: raping to rape you, You know
[pj_wehry]: yeah, I.
[lewis_gordon]: makes no sense
[pj_wehry]: yeah. it's It's an incredibly perverse abuse of the word
[lewis_gordon]: correct. However,
[lewis_gordon]: um, I was speakingj just about a few hours ago in an on a radio program with a
[lewis_gordon]: where the host I was in the U. K. So this reference was easy to to spot. You
[lewis_gordon]: know. it is possible to have a license to do
[pj_wehry]: Mhm, Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: those things.
[lewis_gordon]: Uh, the iconic example is James Wand, The license to kill. Now, it means when
[lewis_gordon]: we think about it. If we look about, look at the way and again. In the book, I
[lewis_gordon]: make a distinction between white supremacy and
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: antili racism. But but let's just pi. white supremacy. White's supremacy
[lewis_gordon]: basically says, if
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: you are white, you can do whatever you want to people who are not white.
[lewis_gordon]: And and get away with it,
[lewis_gordon]: That's
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: a license and it, and in fact we notice, because there are you could easily
[lewis_gordon]: look at the documentary history of
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: âlynchings. The people who did it pose for the pictures they send post guards.
[pj_wehry]: right that way in the in the newspaper, right,
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, they advertise it at. And so Th. It's very easy to go find out who did
[lewis_gordon]: it Who committed those
[pj_wehry]: H.
[lewis_gordon]: horrific acts of murder and they're fine.
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: They're right. That's a license now. Some
[pj_wehry]: A, they, more than fine. they're celebrated right. That's the point of putting in
[pj_wehry]: the newspaper right,
[lewis_gordon]: they celebrate it.
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, now here's the thing that I I often bring up sometimes when I teach I
[lewis_gordon]: students. what would you do if I you were given a Licene to kill? You can kill
[lewis_gordon]: anybody you want, and you'll never be punished.
[lewis_gordon]: What would you do
[pj_wehry]: I mean, I,
[lewis_gordon]: and it's very interest? No, go ahead now, go ahead, go ahead,
[pj_wehry]: you wouldn't want. you wouldn't like it. I mean, why would I want to kill anyone
[pj_wehry]: Right? like,
[lewis_gordon]: ah, P. but you see, P. âj,
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: this is the point. you're speaking now as an ethical person. An
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: ethical person would say, Wait a minute. wait a minute. Even though there are
[lewis_gordon]: people I may not
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: like.
[lewis_gordon]: I don't think any one should have this license.
[lewis_gordon]: You know, If we think about, for instance,
[lewis_gordon]: and and in a way, a kind of dog whistle, when Donald Trump was running for
[lewis_gordon]: President, was when he boasted he could shoot someone in the head and time
[lewis_gordon]: square and get away with it.
[lewis_gordon]: That's a coldde whistle to people who want license. It's announcement to join
[lewis_gordon]: him to for a a reclamation
[pj_wehry]: hm, Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: of license. Now now here's the thing.
[lewis_gordon]: if you take a position, nobody should have the license, but it was given to
[lewis_gordon]: you without you
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: asking for it.
[lewis_gordon]: That's different from if somebody says you have a privilege, and the reason
[lewis_gordon]: it's different
[lewis_gordon]: is because this is something you can get rid of and maintain your
[pj_wehry]: H,
[lewis_gordon]: humanity.
[lewis_gordon]: And here's how
[lewis_gordon]: you can say you know what. I'm going to collaborate with the people who don't
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: have the license and organize with other people who think nobody should have
[lewis_gordon]: this license, and to and to get rid of a world in which such having such a
[lewis_gordon]: licene as possible. In other words, you can do political
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: work. What? what's the point of saying? We want to do something about racism
[lewis_gordon]: if people can't work together to get rid of it.
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: But in the in that other model
[lewis_gordon]: you get defined in such a way There's nothing you can do than get rid of you,
[pj_wehry]: right, right, right, Yeah, which is Yes. Yeah, go ahead,
[lewis_gordon]: so so donene up. So that's the thing. I mean, you know. I mean
[lewis_gordon]: it's different. You want to enjoy a feminist struggle as a male. Nars is to
[lewis_gordon]: say you're a good male. That's that's that's a waste of time. But but it's
[lewis_gordon]: different if you say, look,
[lewis_gordon]: I don't want women to be discriminated, said Oh, my daughter, my mother, my
[lewis_gordon]: sister, and I also think the idea of constructing me by virtue of my, my, my
[lewis_gordon]: anatomy as su to women is a profound injustice to the humanity of them,
[lewis_gordon]: and to me because it constructs me as superior to them. So I want to fight
[pj_wehry]: Hm, Hm, Hm,
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: against sexism. You don't have to thank me, you don't have to say. I'm better
[lewis_gordon]: than other people. I'm joining in a struggle to make sure people are treated
[lewis_gordon]: with equal dignity and respect
[lewis_gordon]: that you can do,
[pj_wehry]: right, right and
[lewis_gordon]: And that's the point. not sorry. Goe Pj.
[pj_wehry]: yes, yeah, no, no, um, you know it's really interesting, Um, because when it
[pj_wehry]: becomes super individualized,
[pj_wehry]: uh, uh, and this does get valrized in Hollywood. I've talked to. I had Doctor
[pj_wehry]: Woodley on from the new school, Um, and we were talking about um. Uh, she
[pj_wehry]: mentioned how racism as like something mean people when mean people do mean things
[pj_wehry]: to other people Right And it's
[pj_wehry]: how do you? How do you stop that right? It's like you. You have to go out and hunt
[pj_wehry]: down the racist, and in a lot of ways that's kind of what people. and and it, The
[pj_wehry]: weird thing is it creates, Um
[pj_wehry]: it. it. And the uh, you know, there's this problematic thing where we often
[pj_wehry]: remember mass murderers more than they're victims because they're They're more
[pj_wehry]: interesting, right because we've become obsessed with that like. I mean, you look
[pj_wehry]: at all the shows about serial killers and it's almost the same thing with racist,
[pj_wehry]: where it's like we become infatuated with people who really should not be listened
[pj_wehry]: to. And uh, there is that. Um. You know, Fuko talks about that double spiral of
[pj_wehry]: the more you investigate something, even if that person is something you're
[pj_wehry]: investigating. That it, it pushes back into you
[pj_wehry]: if that makes sense,
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, the sure. the thing that many people miss. Okay, If you want to dominate
[lewis_gordon]: a people, and the way you want to do, it is to be using tanks and guns and all
[lewis_gordon]: that all the time. that's a lot of resources.
[pj_wehry]: know it is. Yes,
[lewis_gordon]: But
[lewis_gordon]: if you
[lewis_gordon]: can create a whole web of beliefs that make them police themselves, they make
[lewis_gordon]: them believe their inferior
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: inferior, and make people who would have otherwise fought and joined them in a
[lewis_gordon]: struggle against their their demanization, believe they are superior.
[lewis_gordon]: What you? If you do it enough you can make you do something
[lewis_gordon]: Uh. with the effect of making the ongoing mechanism of deminization
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: ordinary, See the mistakes people make, and this is part of the problem. They
[lewis_gordon]: want to focus on these fabulous and
[lewis_gordon]: outrageous cases, but they don't realize that racism is mundane. You have to.
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: You have to make it reach a point almost like the way a fish is in water.
[lewis_gordon]: and I have to remind people that, Um, if we're talk about racists, not racism.
[lewis_gordon]: Many most racists
[lewis_gordon]: are nice people.
[pj_wehry]: right, Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: In fact, most racs in some cases don't even know they racist. It's when they
[lewis_gordon]: encounter a situation
[lewis_gordon]: that makes them realize they want to maintain a system of the exclusion that
[lewis_gordon]: they begin to, and they, they don't want to be
[pj_wehry]: right, right,
[lewis_gordon]: called racist.
[lewis_gordon]: called racist.
[lewis_gordon]: But they are actively involved in the maintenance of racism, And you know it's
[lewis_gordon]: funny when you think about it, you know. I remember. When I was a kid, I used
[lewis_gordon]: to watch the Andy Griffith show
[lewis_gordon]: and Mayberry looks so nice, doesn't it?
[lewis_gordon]: And it's in the South and the uh, you know the Shere, Everybody's goofy and
[pj_wehry]: y,
[lewis_gordon]: Andy and Opi
[lewis_gordon]: and I thought you know it looks so nice.
[lewis_gordon]: But if I showed up
[lewis_gordon]: and I and I began to realize Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: at when when when people like me are not around, these are very nice people.
[lewis_gordon]: They treat each other well,
[lewis_gordon]: and and in cases the condition if I am around is that I must somehow function
[lewis_gordon]: as an exception to their beliefs about black people in general,
[lewis_gordon]: which is the maintenance of that system. So I have to be around in a way that
[lewis_gordon]: says I won't change anything.
[lewis_gordon]: So this is an example of wanting permitting people to come in as long as they
[lewis_gordon]: don't change the game. But what if the game is
[pj_wehry]: hm, hm,
[lewis_gordon]: the problem
[lewis_gordon]: you see, and I often put it this way? You know.
[lewis_gordon]: My issue is not that dairy, moral people or
[lewis_gordon]: racist individuals in the world.
[lewis_gordon]: My issue is that we've organized a world that puts a a lot of power behind
[lewis_gordon]: them.
[lewis_gordon]: If we disepower
[lewis_gordon]: that system. If we change things around,
[lewis_gordon]: then we're freed up to work on better relationships
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: with each other.
[lewis_gordon]: Now De, the people are the moralists For them. That's insufficient.
[lewis_gordon]: They're more obsessed that racist people exist, and they want to, as you said,
[lewis_gordon]: root them out and find them. Now. The point of the matter is Yo.
[lewis_gordon]: they're not powerful any morere.
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: They'rerrelevant There are a lot of people who could hate me as long as they.
[lewis_gordon]: they don't have guns and stuff are coming from me and trying to destroy me.
[lewis_gordon]: Um, they' have a right to live. They're human beings and one of the things we
[lewis_gordon]: have to have
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: room with, and this might tap into something. It's It's not exclusively
[lewis_gordon]: Christian, but it does tap into something.
[lewis_gordon]: Ah, that my guesses it connected to something you are love in Christianity.
[lewis_gordon]: and that, first of all, the first ems is that every human being is equal in
[lewis_gordon]: the eyes of God.
[lewis_gordon]: The second premise, though, which is a rather interesting one,
[lewis_gordon]: is that
[lewis_gordon]: you must let go of your ego
[lewis_gordon]: and enable
[lewis_gordon]: to to to create a situation
[lewis_gordon]: right. And it it, It's a complex one, because because God is the biggest
[pj_wehry]: right, hm,
[pj_wehry]: right, right,
[lewis_gordon]: right, so you got a leg off your ego.
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: I haveve got you have let go of your ego,
[lewis_gordon]: and to in doing so create a condition
[lewis_gordon]: in which other people can have possibility.
[pj_wehry]: hm
[lewis_gordon]: Now a moment you say the word possibility
[lewis_gordon]: right, It's not that people would at the end of the day change,
[lewis_gordon]: but there has to be faith in people's capacity to change.
[lewis_gordon]: But how could people exemplify that if we don't create the opportunities
[pj_wehry]: right.
[lewis_gordon]: you see? So so so the thing about it then
[lewis_gordon]: is that
[lewis_gordon]: even though
[lewis_gordon]: um, the mundane world may be built upon exclusion,
[lewis_gordon]: it's going to be very important
[lewis_gordon]: for us to create opportunities to bring an understanding of that in exclusion
[lewis_gordon]: to bear, and to bring with it
[lewis_gordon]: uh resources and mechanisms so people could work together to create a
[lewis_gordon]: healthier society
[lewis_gordon]: and I could give a a short example of this, Uh, a very
[pj_wehry]: Sure,
[lewis_gordon]: mundane one, right, but it's a rather striking one. I was speaking with um,
[lewis_gordon]: uh, in another interview the other day with with somebody who was Um in
[lewis_gordon]: Indiana,
[lewis_gordon]: And there was a time when I, I. I taught uh briefly in Indiana.
[pj_wehry]: right. you mentioned in the book Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah and um.
[lewis_gordon]: but what I did mention, Uh w in the. but it was this this story.
[lewis_gordon]: Um, see there parts. It's to today. it's more difficult because everybody has
[lewis_gordon]: smart phones and access to the Internet. But the time I'm talking about fewer
[lewis_gordon]: people add access to the Internet. It was such a big deal. In fact, when he
[lewis_gordon]: became a professorcause. You got this thing called an email. You know it was
[lewis_gordon]: such a big deal, but most people didn't have that, and in some places
[lewis_gordon]: especially if they're very very strict. in, in some
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: cases biblical, there's not even television. There's
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: not so right so that you can have certain farm areas where there are people
[lewis_gordon]: who are legally designated white
[lewis_gordon]: who never ever has never seen a non white person
[pj_wehry]: yeah, yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: ever.
[lewis_gordon]: And in that world all they hear about
[lewis_gordon]: are negative
[lewis_gordon]: statements on what those people are, The the non white people. Now, what's
[lewis_gordon]: rather interesting? After a certain while, they do learn about the word racism
[lewis_gordon]: and racist? Now what's interesting in a lot of those people in' world? A lot
[lewis_gordon]: of these young people yet convinced that they are racist Because in that
[pj_wehry]: yeah, Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: context I think racism is right.
[lewis_gordon]: that âultimate, because think about it. If black people are really all these
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: things, they hear
[lewis_gordon]: things, they hear
[lewis_gordon]: what's wrong with Be ercist.
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: So so then what happens is they go to a public university.
[lewis_gordon]: There's suddenly in a place where there black students working around. They
[lewis_gordon]: may even come to a classroom with as a black
[lewis_gordon]: professor.
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: Now they've walked into that environment completely convinced. Erasist. You
[lewis_gordon]: got it. now, What I, what I experienced was that there's some when they saw
[lewis_gordon]: that a black professor got up and walked
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: out the classroom.
[lewis_gordon]: But there were others who stayed
[lewis_gordon]: and after a while we taught we got to know each other.
[lewis_gordon]: The a conversation as follows inevitably happens, you know Professor Gordon.
[lewis_gordon]: this is the first time I, this is the first. I'm a freshman. It's the first
[lewis_gordon]: time I've ever even been around black people,
[lewis_gordon]: and if I could tell you the things that I thought black people were,
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: but then I, so are they expect you to meet these
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: monsters and they said, But instead they walked into a place where they were
[lewis_gordon]: like, Uh, they're human beings here
[lewis_gordon]: and then they're like Some this. There's a disconnction going on. I'm not
[lewis_gordon]: supposed to â. like you. I'm not supposed. I'm not a lot of. I'm
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: not supposed to, and you're supposed to be this way in that way, but none of
[lewis_gordon]: that
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: is there. What's going on and then they. So you see where I'm going with this.
[lewis_gordon]: There's some people who are raised racist, but discover they're not
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: racist. Not through a project of not being racist, but' their realization that
[lewis_gordon]: they
[lewis_gordon]: lack the capacity to block access to seeing a black person or a Native
[lewis_gordon]: American as
[pj_wehry]: hm, hm,
[lewis_gordon]: a human being, and those people end up going through a kind of cosmic shift
[lewis_gordon]: and how they see the world and do things, And some of those students, for
[lewis_gordon]: instance, I said, you know you need to see more of the world. I wrote letters
[lewis_gordon]: for them to travel,
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: orbroad,
[lewis_gordon]: all kinds of other things, Some of them write me to this day. I'm talking
[lewis_gordon]: about, you know, gone up
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: thirty years ago. so, but my, but by my point is, it's
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: not everybody
[lewis_gordon]: right. Some people did
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: leave the room,
[lewis_gordon]: but the point is that
[lewis_gordon]: when it comes to this in their
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: world,
[lewis_gordon]: they grew up with people who in every other aspect of life were're nice. In
[lewis_gordon]: many places that are racist. They're people who check on their neighbors. May
[lewis_gordon]: or come over and say, bring them, um, a piece of cake, or they go to churches
[lewis_gordon]: together, or you know they do. They may, if if there's a tornado go through a
[lewis_gordon]: lot of
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: tornadoes in Indiana. They, they join in and help them
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: build up the barn or fix the houses or those tornadoes that hit Kentucky. Yet
[lewis_gordon]: there are a lot of
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: racist people there, but a lot of them were sit working together, trying to
[lewis_gordon]: rebuild communities. You see, what I'm getting at the humanity of the people
[lewis_gordon]: can be such that we have to deal with a system that makes it ordinary for them
[lewis_gordon]: fit to fail to connect with that common humanity. And that's that's where the
[lewis_gordon]: political work and the individualized moral work come in. Because if I is a
[lewis_gordon]: professor, take the position that any white student who comes into my
[lewis_gordon]: classroom must not be addressed as a human
[pj_wehry]: hm, hm, hm,
[lewis_gordon]: being as a student. That's a. That's an
[lewis_gordon]: unethical professor. I
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: shouldn't be teaching. I have to see every student who comes into my classroom
[lewis_gordon]: as a possibility,
[lewis_gordon]: not as an epistemological closure.
[pj_wehry]: Yeah, absolutely, um,
[pj_wehry]: man, I, I, just it's always such a joy to talk to you and there's so much there.
[pj_wehry]: Uh, you know you you mentioned and I think it's come up a couple of times when you
[pj_wehry]: talk about the system.
[pj_wehry]: Uh, is there other there? other terms that could be used for it? Something that
[pj_wehry]: seems to come up a lot. Are the narratives in place with the system? Could we
[pj_wehry]: even? would a synonym be a web of narratives, Because it seems like the majority
[pj_wehry]: of it is that you know you talk about that web of beliefs, but it's almost a
[pj_wehry]: thicker description of it than that where it's like this whole. How the way that
[pj_wehry]: it works. Does that make sense? Am I tracking with you?
[lewis_gordon]: Sure,
[lewis_gordon]: well, the thing to remember is you could probably guess as you read the book.
[lewis_gordon]: One of the things I con consistently do is to challenge what I call singular
[lewis_gordon]: readings of
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: human phenomena that it's both end. There are many
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: things at once, so for instance, uh, what a system is
[lewis_gordon]: is a repeated,
[lewis_gordon]: a form of repeated practice that in its repetition develops
[lewis_gordon]: intelligibility. It begins to make sense. It's how people interpret the world.
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: Another way of interpreted that. interpreting that is in structuralism, where
[lewis_gordon]: they say a structure is a rule that enables other rules that enable things to
[lewis_gordon]: function. You see.
[lewis_gordon]: So once we understand that, even though that's a more abstract technical way
[lewis_gordon]: of putting it, that includes narratives and other things as well, now the
[lewis_gordon]: thing about it is
[lewis_gordon]: in ordinary logic. so to speak, you are able to look at something as logical
[lewis_gordon]: because it has an order and it's
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: well formed. The technical term is well formed, formula. in ordinary language
[lewis_gordon]: a complete sentence Right.
[lewis_gordon]: The problem, of course, is that a human being is not really a being. it's not
[lewis_gordon]: really a complete sentence. A human being, in a present particable sense, is
[lewis_gordon]: an ongoing activity,
[lewis_gordon]: which means that human created phenomena
[lewis_gordon]: have subsets of completeness. But the overall thing is open.
[lewis_gordon]: Why that is important
[lewis_gordon]: is because
[lewis_gordon]: when we forget that it's human beings that create Hu, create the
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: systems we live in.
[lewis_gordon]: We ontologze, we make them fixed and permanent, when they actually depend on
[lewis_gordon]: us to function,
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: which means we can do them in a different way,
[pj_wehry]: right. right, which is all about opening Ear Book is is a political act because
[pj_wehry]: it's opening a possibility.
[lewis_gordon]: Correct. In fact, when a description I add of students is, I don't see
[lewis_gordon]: students
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: as things.
[lewis_gordon]: I see students as communicative opportunities,
[lewis_gordon]: And that is ongoing, or the way I usually say to students I work with. I
[lewis_gordon]: always. every class I teach I ask open with a question. What is a professor
[lewis_gordon]: and is? likewise, this professor Asenus, What's a professor? said they, and
[lewis_gordon]: they almost all always give an example of a of a
[lewis_gordon]: obnoxious dictator or Moses with the tablet,
[lewis_gordon]: And I say Well, you ask him what a student is and you know they say somebody
[lewis_gordon]: wants to learn. I said Well, you know the way I understand myself as a
[lewis_gordon]: professor is someone who fell in love with
[pj_wehry]: Mhm.
[lewis_gordon]: learning and never stopped. In other words, a lifelong student, and as an
[lewis_gordon]: advanced student, because I've been doing it a long time, I could tell you as
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: an advanced student every time I meet a new student, that new student is
[lewis_gordon]: bringing experiences I
[lewis_gordon]: may not have had, which means that that student may have a different
[lewis_gordon]: orientation or angle on what I'm studying, which means every semester I've
[lewis_gordon]: taught, I've learned something from a
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: student, so my students realize. Oh, wait a minute. they're
[pj_wehry]: right.
[lewis_gordon]: active. They're not to be passive. And then together I said, So the classroom
[lewis_gordon]: is a co learning experience and we work together. Now. Why do we? what what
[lewis_gordon]: happens there?
[lewis_gordon]: It means they can be critical. We can learn together. and it means the subject
[lewis_gordon]: is open, and in fact, I even extend that to an existential concept. I mean
[lewis_gordon]: understanding of reading my Sts. over. Shocked when I said nobody's ever read
[lewis_gordon]: a philosophy book. In fact, nobody's ever read a book. and you're like, What
[lewis_gordon]: are you talking about? I said No, it, you are reading it. You're in an ongoing
[pj_wehry]: hm.
[lewis_gordon]: relationship with it, even even short children's books. The things you read
[lewis_gordon]: when you are six
[pj_wehry]: right.
[lewis_gordon]: seven years old. If you picked them up to day, you're like Ha. I didn't notice
[lewis_gordon]: that,
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: right this. This reading makes you see new things, and I said,
[pj_wehry]: Never mind when you learn different versions of the fairy tales you read as a kid.
[pj_wehry]: I remember reading. I read the complete
[lewis_gordon]: Oh yeah.
[pj_wehry]: Grims fairy tales and then you go back and watch like
[lewis_gordon]: oh
[pj_wehry]: the old Disney, and you' like
[pj_wehry]: That's not what that means.
[lewis_gordon]: yeah. yeah. in in in in in the first
[pj_wehry]: Oh yeah.
[lewis_gordon]: edition. ah, uh, The the, The, The âqueen was Snow White's biological mother.
[lewis_gordon]: That freaked out audiences. So the grime brothers rerote it to say the
[lewis_gordon]: biological mother died, and the âqueen is the stepmother.
[pj_wehry]: oh,
[pj_wehry]: bem.
[lewis_gordon]: But but yeah, but but but my point is that openness you see, learning
[lewis_gordon]: is a communicative practice in which in which we learned together,
[lewis_gordon]: That's the thing. And and we should be sufficiently sufficiently secure
[lewis_gordon]: about our humanity to be open for that ongoing practice. And it's not that
[lewis_gordon]: they are not things that we know. we know the H. two O is water,
[lewis_gordon]: but we also know that things that look like water are not necessarily H to O.
[pj_wehry]: this is true. Yes, and someone's experience of water who grew up on the coastline
[pj_wehry]: is very different from someone's experience of H. O, who grew up in the Midwest,
[pj_wehry]: and even in the Midwest, someone who grew up in Indiana, versus someone who grew
[pj_wehry]: up in Wisconsin, near the Great Lakes. I mean all very
[lewis_gordon]: Sure,
[pj_wehry]: different experiences of H two O.
[lewis_gordon]: yeah, I, and and e, and even more, even when we think about oceans,
[lewis_gordon]: I remember the first time I saw the Pacific Ocean. It bugged me out.
[lewis_gordon]: but because look when I was a child he went to the beach. It's all the
[lewis_gordon]: Atlantic Ocean and everybody Atlantic ocean people. The ocean goes out like
[lewis_gordon]: that. It go. It almost goes down. and
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: there is the sun. And even when I went in into the midws in Chicago, and
[lewis_gordon]: places saw the Great Lakes,
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: it was similar. You know,
[lewis_gordon]: if you go to
[lewis_gordon]: Washington State, Oregon, California knows it's weird, but the the Pacific
[lewis_gordon]: Ocean goes up,
[lewis_gordon]: and then it goes over
[pj_wehry]: h,
[lewis_gordon]: to the horizon and I was like this is weird
[lewis_gordon]: and there are all
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: kinds of things. It's cloor and so forth, an out. And then at at that moment I
[lewis_gordon]: began to realize Yo. They're Pacific Ocean people and their Atlantic Ocean
[lewis_gordon]: people,
[lewis_gordon]: and I, you know, and then there. and and I remember too when I was in in in in
[lewis_gordon]: in af in a Ggon across Africa. there's the Atlantic part of Africa, and then
[lewis_gordon]: there's the Indian Ocean, part of Africa. The Indian Ocean is
[pj_wehry]: hm, hm,
[lewis_gordon]: so different, but again these are things. Yeah, Yeah, there's salt and is
[lewis_gordon]: water, Anda blah, blah blah. It's far more complicated than we realize. And
[lewis_gordon]: but even when we study stuff in astronomy, if you look at Eurpa or Titan, and
[lewis_gordon]: so forth, there are places out there where it looks like an ocean in, you
[lewis_gordon]: know, beneath the ice in certain places, But that's methane. A, and a lot of
[lewis_gordon]: us don't realize, And there are things in physics a lot of us don't realize
[lewis_gordon]: 'cause we see ourselves as solid, but you know, relative to something that is
[lewis_gordon]: much colder than us, we're a gas. we're
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: gaseous and something even colder. We're just light. We're just
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: energy and there are people that just don't understand it. And then there are
[lewis_gordon]: other simple things. a simple philosophical exercise on perspective. The way I
[lewis_gordon]: usually teach what the
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: body is
[lewis_gordon]: is to say you know a body is basically a location through which you're able to
[lewis_gordon]: say the word there,
[lewis_gordon]: here and there. It's a Sp. temple coordinate. Now the way you live, it is
[lewis_gordon]: different. We see ourselves as fully bodied, so when I go what I do is, I
[lewis_gordon]: often put a dot, just a little dot with a marker on the on the
[pj_wehry]: mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: whiteboard. Okay, these days is mostly whiteboard In the pat of was blackbard.
[lewis_gordon]: So I put a with a chalked dot right,
[lewis_gordon]: and I said, You ever wonder if a dot had a point of view how we would
[lewis_gordon]: experience it? Imagine it, and of course the dot's point of view would be as a
[lewis_gordon]: full body like I am one big dot
[lewis_gordon]: you see, And we don't realize that If you imagine if they you see a friend,
[lewis_gordon]: you say by in a fringe steps in a helicopter, you're both fully embdied, but
[lewis_gordon]: as that helicopter begins to rise, you get smaller and smaller and smaller,
[lewis_gordon]: and before you name, see your. Hands waving, 'cause you're just a dot,
[lewis_gordon]: and from the as so, what you think is just a
[pj_wehry]: H.
[lewis_gordon]: fixed object is a whole living reality and the people, and when you look up at
[lewis_gordon]: them, that little dot that's going away, That helicopter. You think it is like
[lewis_gordon]: a little frozen dot, but is a whole life going on in there And this is the
[lewis_gordon]: thing we' missing when we, when we try to deal with communication into
[lewis_gordon]: subjectivity, embodiment and all of that that there is. from a relational
[lewis_gordon]: perspective. A lot going on
[lewis_gordon]: in lived reality
[pj_wehry]: Yeah, and I love that and I think that's why I connect so much with Uh. The way
[pj_wehry]: one your philosophical emphasis, and the way you do philosophy is, I think one of
[pj_wehry]: the biggest strokes we have as human beings, at least uh, from my own experience
[pj_wehry]: is that we don't realize the fullness and richness uh, of everyone else's internal
[pj_wehry]: experience right, like we, we look at other people and we see them as this, like,
[pj_wehry]: com, uh, complex shape, uh, constellation of things that we know about them, and
[pj_wehry]: these identities that we kind of try to box in, and it's like they are
[pj_wehry]: experiencing life in the same way that you are. I mean even to take the the dumb.
[pj_wehry]: uh, sorry. not that. not that you're the dot is dumb. You're not your example's
[pj_wehry]: not dumb. but the yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: could be could be
[pj_wehry]: yes,
[lewis_gordon]: a brilliant dot Could be a brilliant dot.
[pj_wehry]: but the uh. to take the Dod example that like, if you were actually a dot, Like
[pj_wehry]: what to us, as we think of as a circle. No, it would. It would be very important
[pj_wehry]: to the dot, All the little granual differentiations we, when you do like, I mean,
[pj_wehry]: they would probably organize themselves depending on F. They were slightly square
[pj_wehry]: and we wouldn't be able to tell the difference right. Like if you had a series of
[pj_wehry]: dots. Um, and so it's just really. um,
[pj_wehry]: yeah, I. I. I really appreciate that. Uh, I have a question and this might be
[pj_wehry]: because I have a proof copy, but I have to. I have to ask us for my own curiosity,
[pj_wehry]: because I almost never get to ask these kind of questions on page ninety three.
[pj_wehry]: Um, I laughed about this for ten minutes and it's because I enjoy the ambiguity of
[pj_wehry]: this. Um,
[lewis_gordon]: This is the the final
[pj_wehry]: yes,
[lewis_gordon]: copy. By the way, we' talking about copies, I mean they'll be listening, but
[lewis_gordon]: this is the Penguig
[lewis_gordon]: Warundabout British copy. But some people would, some people say, I have to
[pj_wehry]: Oh, that's cool.
[lewis_gordon]: give a shot out to the artist. Her name is Sim
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: Abbe, who did that one and I I love both copies because they S
[pj_wehry]: yes,
[lewis_gordon]: so much and then so and then this is the U. S. copy. Bynock him a Korean
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: American artist and she Ss. so much because it's
[pj_wehry]: right.
[lewis_gordon]: ambiguous right is the Black rising or slipping? You know,
[lewis_gordon]: But anyway you were saying Page ninety three.
[pj_wehry]: yes, you say. uh, even an otherwise good bloke such as the actor Lem Nison. Uh,
[pj_wehry]: infamously confessed to when to kill random black men. Um.
[pj_wehry]: I, why did you use the word bloqu?
[lewis_gordon]: Oh, pretty
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: straightforward because you know I' I'm a global dude. I've been all over the
[lewis_gordon]: place. I have a family in
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: the U. K. and I'm also of Scottish and Irish ancestry
[pj_wehry]: okay, yeah, I wondered. Yeah.
[lewis_gordon]: And so I did it
[pj_wehry]: Okay
[lewis_gordon]: on purpose to. Yeah,
[pj_wehry]: to connect to deli of Nsan. It was. the word choice
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah,
[pj_wehry]: was so unexpected for me that I like I, and I couldn't tell if that was view being
[pj_wehry]: Um. it. there is a lot of ambigu possible ambiguity there. Uh, if you were being
[pj_wehry]: sarcastic with the good bloke, or if you actually meet, you actually think of him
[pj_wehry]: as a good bloke, but be and I go ahead.
[lewis_gordon]: otherwise I used to love the At Leam Nsen. That so disappointed me when that
[pj_wehry]: Oh yeah for sure, and that, I mean, and rightfully so I.
[lewis_gordon]: happened, you know.
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah,
[pj_wehry]: the.
[pj_wehry]: but I, I think it's be. I. I would have read it as you just being disappointed.
[pj_wehry]: Otherwise, you know, if you'd put an otherwise good guy like Leam, Nson, but when
[pj_wehry]: you put bloke I, it set my mind into like several different paths of like. Is he
[pj_wehry]: being sarcastic like he's not really a good bloke at all? I mean, obviously not
[pj_wehry]: like that, but I, I got a real kick out of that, so I not often I get to ask an
[pj_wehry]: author
[pj_wehry]: about those little, uh, those little details. So I enjoyed that. Um,
[lewis_gordon]: yeah, yeah, that. and it also doess. Yeah, it's just more for fun also in
[lewis_gordon]: reading and writing and there ways in which we can talk about communities. but
[lewis_gordon]: also one of the things is, Um
[lewis_gordon]: to to point out, this is to bring out the point about
[lewis_gordon]: environments. We can have environments that bring out the worst in us, and
[lewis_gordon]: environments that bring out the best in us. And you could tell my everything,
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: every all of my work. because I'm a really committed person to the
[lewis_gordon]: concept of freedom is is people's capacity for growth or for change. And I
[lewis_gordon]: think we're in deep trouble. Whereing as when we reach a point where Um,
[lewis_gordon]: we don't commit ourselves to creating conditions for change.
[pj_wehry]: right. Well, that's what. the's the way people
[lewis_gordon]: You know.
[pj_wehry]: always will' always be like that right at.
[pj_wehry]: such's a dangerous sentiment,
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: it really is it really. And and when people are afraid of truth, you see. a
[lewis_gordon]: lot of people think truth is fixed, but truth is also revealing the capacity
[lewis_gordon]: for change.
[lewis_gordon]: you know. Um, you know it it. It's really terrible this effort that's being
[lewis_gordon]: done in this country right now to suppress truth, the idea, A, and, and to use
[lewis_gordon]: the arm the the argument about
[lewis_gordon]: discomfort.
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: But the fact to the matter is Um,
[lewis_gordon]: you know at and some levels certain people don't want their children to to
[lewis_gordon]: know that
[lewis_gordon]: Um. they were not at their best in certain periods of this country's history,
[lewis_gordon]: very recent periods. But I think the best thing you could teach your children
[lewis_gordon]: is not to hide the truth from them, but to say you know what. In revealing the
[lewis_gordon]: truth to you, I'm demonstrating to you my commitment to change those things
[lewis_gordon]: were wrong,
[lewis_gordon]: and
[lewis_gordon]: I would like us together as a family
[lewis_gordon]: to learn how to build change.
[lewis_gordon]: Because you see if you keep bllyd to your children, some point they are going
[lewis_gordon]: to have to like those farm kids in Indiana. Talk about, go to college so forth
[lewis_gordon]: and
[lewis_gordon]: they' be quite disappointed because the message that's being given in that
[lewis_gordon]: suppression
[lewis_gordon]: is the mistaking view that people cannot do otherwise,
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: And and that message in one's actions is to say to one's children I cannot
[lewis_gordon]: change. We cannot
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: change.
[lewis_gordon]: But if one acknowledges having done things that
[lewis_gordon]: today one regrets
[lewis_gordon]: and say,
[lewis_gordon]: I would like us to work together to build things of which we can be proud.
[lewis_gordon]: I think that's the best gift you can give as parent to your children.
[pj_wehry]: Yeah, yeah, my. probably my favorite part of being a parent is having my chil. My
[pj_wehry]: kids surprise me right like
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, I love it
[pj_wehry]: that. That possibility is, I mean, even, and I that that love comes through. Uh,
[pj_wehry]: is your son's name is it? Elijah? Yes, what do you talk about like his different
[pj_wehry]: comedic action throughout the book. You know I like, and I' love that you know.
[pj_wehry]: Um, uh, My oldest is a little bit of a clown and my youngest is just a clear
[pj_wehry]: warrior. You know like he'. He's so. it surprises me with how aggressive he is And
[pj_wehry]: it's just and I'm constantly. as much as I even characterize like that. I'm just
[pj_wehry]: constantly surprised like I, we. We start to think of someone this way, and the
[pj_wehry]: amazing thing about kids is they haven't learned yet
[pj_wehry]: to to put themselves in the boxes we give them, and my probably my biggest
[pj_wehry]: challenge is the parent is to uh, avoid those boxes as much as I can. right, like
[pj_wehry]: we. we want to enforce. You know certain, uh ways of thinking, and then you, you
[pj_wehry]: start to look and see what they can become And it's it's really, uh, amazing and I
[pj_wehry]: think that's that really speaks to what you talked about. Um, I had to think
[pj_wehry]: through this uh phrase a little bit to understand what you' getting at to act from
[pj_wehry]: commitment, Uh, defies imitation.
[pj_wehry]: and
[lewis_gordon]: correct. That's
[pj_wehry]: that that idea I don't want my kids to be like me, and that to love is to open up
[pj_wehry]: the possibilities of a completely different but hopefully better world.
[lewis_gordon]: well said, well said, and in fact I have I have four children, two boys, two
[lewis_gordon]: girls. the boys are book ends and I gotta tell you, I'm constantly
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: learning from my children, but you know they are also these wonderful moments
[lewis_gordon]: because I bring up different diff. I bring them up in different ways in the
[lewis_gordon]: book. You know, for instance, my oldlest son is rare is the one where I bring
[lewis_gordon]: up with the
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: policeman example. But uh, but the um,
[lewis_gordon]: but the. But there are these moments where we surprise our kids And this is
[lewis_gordon]: what I mean. There are times because my children are all adults. Now they're
[lewis_gordon]: not kids any more. They're you know, they're in their twenties and thirties,
[lewis_gordon]: and um the moments when they visit
[lewis_gordon]: and they discover that it was something they introduced me to,
[lewis_gordon]: and and that I love it and
[pj_wehry]: yes, yes,
[lewis_gordon]: I'm doing it and I've corrected my language on the basis of what they taught
[lewis_gordon]: me. They're like. Oh wow, Dad does
[lewis_gordon]: that. I didn't expect that
[pj_wehry]: da changes. Yes,
[lewis_gordon]: and I realized that's yeah, it's not only what they teach, but when they, what
[lewis_gordon]: happens to our children when they see our capacity to change
[pj_wehry]: H,
[lewis_gordon]: and learn.
[lewis_gordon]: And and you know, because I mean, you know, Um,
[lewis_gordon]: I was born in the sixties, and you know the sixties. And but you know, and and
[lewis_gordon]: I was an adolescent in the seventies and the seventies was wild, but the
[lewis_gordon]: seventy, but the seventies. the Noman
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: Cllacher. It's not like what we have. They're things that we saw, but we had
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: no language for which
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: just didn't and these generations are developing language for those things. I
[lewis_gordon]: mean you know, for instance, even when we say words like
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: Tnd today in the seventies, you transsexual or
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: transvestite, but there's this more complicated insight in the term just
[lewis_gordon]: saying
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: trance that connects to things like disciplines, and uh, and the openness of
[lewis_gordon]: relations that people can have. And at first when I just kept hearing Trnds, I
[lewis_gordon]: thought that was weird, but then as I looked through it and thought through
[lewis_gordon]: it, I thought you know it
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: makes sense, So I went and bought a whole bunch of books, started studying and
[lewis_gordon]: then I, and then it in front of me. They're trans students and we're working
[lewis_gordon]: and we're learning and I, and and I'm introduced to a world where where
[lewis_gordon]: it informs me, it makes me grow as a human being and the relationships are
[lewis_gordon]: enriching. And so you know, Wh, when uh, you know, M one, one of my children
[lewis_gordon]: publicly identifies as âqueer. Um, you know, say, and we're talking at at at a
[lewis_gordon]: moment you know says wow,
[lewis_gordon]: wow, Dad, you know, I, I had no idea, but you know 'cause it's
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: an adult now and this, And and because she you know, didn't see me as Um
[pj_wehry]: hm, yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: as a phhobic
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: or anything like that. It is. Just instead, it was more trying to say there's
[lewis_gordon]: this
[pj_wehry]: hm,
[lewis_gordon]: whole language and I wonder how that would be if Dad thought
[pj_wehry]: yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: about that, but then discovering Dad
[pj_wehry]: yes,
[lewis_gordon]: did think about it, learn and thank her for that and other people as well. And
[lewis_gordon]: did think about it, learn and thank her for that and other people as well. And
[lewis_gordon]: that's point, and there are many other things you know. It's not just about
[lewis_gordon]: that's point, and there are many other things you know. It's not just about
[lewis_gordon]: those cons. There are many things that we could learn you know from our from
[lewis_gordon]: those cons. There are many things that we could learn you know from our from
[lewis_gordon]: our from our children, But the thing is
[lewis_gordon]: our from our children, But the thing is
[lewis_gordon]: we have to be secure
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: enough
[lewis_gordon]: for our Ch. To to in front of our children, reveal that we're not all knowing
[lewis_gordon]: we're not gods. It's funny. It's what I was talking about today. class. I was
[lewis_gordon]: teaching some
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: on de Bovoir and she opens a book. Um, you know, Um,
[lewis_gordon]: you know, uh po. you know. The book translated, as you know, for an ethics
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: of ambiguity, and she opens up with saying, You know children are in a world
[lewis_gordon]: where parents are gods, because they believe we
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: always have it right.
[lewis_gordon]: and there's a point at which
[lewis_gordon]: even when they daydream they hope one day to be those gods. But the reason
[lewis_gordon]: adolescence is so tumultuous is because they are realizing their parents are
[lewis_gordon]: not gods. their parents are human beings, and oh my God, they realize where
[lewis_gordon]: they were younger. They had a kind of security in the belief that their
[pj_wehry]: right, Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: parents
[pj_wehry]: right,
[lewis_gordon]: were gods, because they believe their parents
[pj_wehry]: Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: could protect them. But then when they realize their parents are not gods,
[lewis_gordon]: such just human beings, like everybody else means your parents can't really
[lewis_gordon]: protect you any more they could try. But they, you now face the same
[lewis_gordon]: limitations as your parents. and for it makes it tumultuous because you're
[lewis_gordon]: struggling to deal with that
[pj_wehry]: Hm, Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: responsibility. And and so there's this moment
[lewis_gordon]: in which what of discovery
[lewis_gordon]: right that that, what a secure parent would say is I never was a God. It's
[lewis_gordon]: just that I was responsible to do my best to take care of you and protect you.
[lewis_gordon]: And sometimes I failed. Sometimes I succeed. but at the end of the day your
[lewis_gordon]: ability, your ability to live in the world as
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: a good human being brings me
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: joy.
[pj_wehry]: as always, so good. I if I could just ask you to uh, kind of wrap up here. I want
[pj_wehry]: to be respectful of your time. Um,
[pj_wehry]: obviously, people, I think they should read your book, but uh, let's say after
[pj_wehry]: they read your book, What three books? Uh? would you uh recommend to dig deeper
[pj_wehry]: into Uh, this kind of topic, this idea of political commitment and the opening up
[pj_wehry]: of possibility.
[lewis_gordon]: Well, one, because it's the sevenenttieth anniversary of the book is Fraance
[lewis_gordon]: Fernand's Blackskin White Mass,
[pj_wehry]: Ohs, that that's why it was
[lewis_gordon]: Another one.
[pj_wehry]: on sale. I mean, not that that's why I bought it, but maybe it was
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, there's a book. There's a book I came across that, Um it that it's very
[lewis_gordon]: insightful. It's by a woman by the name of Uh, Gilianquani
[lewis_gordon]: and um. it's called Living while black.
[lewis_gordon]: She is a therapist and she just gets it a point and says some really really
[lewis_gordon]: extraordinary things
[lewis_gordon]: and I. I. I. I do think that's a a beautiful book to read.
[lewis_gordon]: And there is
[lewis_gordon]: a book by the a woman by the name of Nathalli E Tok. It's called Black
[lewis_gordon]: Melancholia. It's a mixture of port and writing, but she she, she delves.
[pj_wehry]: Hm. Hm,
[lewis_gordon]: She's an a Cameroonian woman who delves. actually. Both of these women are
[lewis_gordon]: connected to Cameroon, but they're really beautiful
[lewis_gordon]: explorations. and um,
[lewis_gordon]: uh, a Toky's book has a concept called four slash giving,
[lewis_gordon]: And it's a really insightful thing to to tap into. Uh, And I wrote the forward
[lewis_gordon]: to
[pj_wehry]: Mhm,
[lewis_gordon]: the English edition because I fell in love with the book. I read it in French
[lewis_gordon]: before and what it is is, you know, A, when people have harmed people in a
[lewis_gordon]: society that's based on contracts, they don't actually want to be forgiven.
[lewis_gordon]: Because if you forgive them, they think they owe you. they don't wa to owe
[lewis_gordon]: anybody anything. So, but she wanted to create a concept of a different kind
[lewis_gordon]: of giving where there's a way to move on without a sense of
[lewis_gordon]: ongoing debt.
[pj_wehry]: H,
[lewis_gordon]: And I leave it at that.
[pj_wehry]: Yeah,
[lewis_gordon]: Fb. should read her book to see to see it.
[pj_wehry]: and that's black melancholia,
[pj_wehry]: Yes,
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, yeah, no, no, it, it. It's it's It's yeah. y it. No, No, it's not black
[lewis_gordon]: melancholia. I say blame. I said the name wrong. I'm sorry about that. It's
[lewis_gordon]: called melancholia Afriicana,
[pj_wehry]: Oh, awesome, thank you.
[lewis_gordon]: Yeah, melancholy Afriicana, Sorry,
[lewis_gordon]: I said the title wrong, but melancholy Afriana,
[pj_wehry]: No, absolutely. Um,
[pj_wehry]: oh,
[pj_wehry]: uh, Doctor Gordon, absolute pleasure, Um, and to our listeners, if you enjoy the
[pj_wehry]: depth, Uh conversation, if you learn something, Um, which I can't see how you
[pj_wehry]: couldn't have, Uh, please like share and subscribe so someone else can to uh,
[pj_wehry]: appreciate it,
[lewis_gordon]: thank you appreciated. P. âj, and
[lewis_gordon]: excuse me for the cough, but to everybody out there, as I said before,
[lewis_gordon]: Be
[pj_wehry]: Hm.
[lewis_gordon]: safe. healthy. Ah, I wish you love, and I know times are difficult, but do
[lewis_gordon]: find joy. You need to remember your humanity.