MedTech Speed to Data

Surgical robots can do all sorts of things better than humans. But human doctors have a breadth of experiential knowledge and instinct robots cannot replicate anytime soon. Understanding that difference is the key to designing a successful robotic platform. Galen Robotics is expanding the benefits of minimally invasive surgeries by enabling precise surgical maneuvers through human-machine cooperation.

Show Notes

The data you need to design a multi-use surgical robot

Surgical robots can do all sorts of things better than humans. But human doctors have a breadth of experiential knowledge and instinct robots cannot replicate anytime soon. Understanding that difference is the key to designing a successful robotic platform. Galen Robotics is expanding the benefits of minimally invasive surgeries by enabling precise surgical maneuvers through human-machine cooperation. 

Andy Rogers of Key Tech and Dave Saunders, CTO at Galen Robotics, discuss the challenges of designing surgical robots and the importance of collecting key data early in the design process.

Need to know:
  • Identify a clinical application that has value for the surgeon
  • Get feedback early and often
  • More prototypes yield more data 
  • Multiple applications help justify cost
  • Converting qualitative data to kinematics is key to optimizing performance

The nitty-gritty:
Robots are transforming surgery, making it faster, safer, and less invasive. But the majority of surgical robots on the market today are one-trick ponies. 
Galen has a unique technology for delicate ear, nose, and throat (ENT) procedures that could have many applications. Leveraging different types of data gave Galen Robotics an advantage in the market.

A priori knowledge. Galen recognized an unmet need in the marketplace and licensed a concept that was initially developed at Johns Hopkins, so they didn’t have to start from scratch. The robot is not the surgical tool; it is a stabilizing platform that holds and manipulates an ordinary surgical tool similar to power steering in a car. Galen Robotics engineers capitalized on the fact that surgeons know how to use the tools of their trade; they just need a helping hand to use the tools more effectively.  

This collaborative approach enables surgeons to focus on what they do best –analyze the situation and decide on a course of action– because the surgical robot stabilizes the instruments and facilitates the procedure. 

Observational data. Engineers went into the OR to see which aspects of specific procedures surgeons found the most challenging to see first hand the scale of motion delicate ENT procedures require. This information proved valuable in driving components choices and materials.

Qualitative data. Surgeons have performed head and neck surgeries for decades, so they know what a successful surgery “feels” like. They already have the touch. In this case, engineers were able to use kinematics to turn this trove of anecdotal information into Quantitative data.

Quantitative data. Engineers then quantified surgical movements to adjust the “feel” and “tune out” normal hand tremor. This made surgical motions performed by the surgeon feel more natural. They also added in range-of-motion safeguards to help prevent accidental damage to surrounding tissues.

Prototyping is essential throughout the whole development process . The more, the better– because no matter how crude– each prototype yields valuable user feedback. For example, one Galen Robotics prototype was modeled on the children’s game “Operation”. Doctors at a conference tried to beat the robot, picking a small part out of a slot. Only one succeeded. And Galen Robotics’ concept was validated.

But ultimately, one of the most innovative ideas Galen Robotics is developing may not be their engineering, but a unique go-to-market plan. A plan that helps hospitals avoid the capital-intensive cost of adding another surgical robotic platform, by licensing a Galen Robotics device once it’s approved.

Give it a listen.



HELPFUL LINKS:
https://www.galenrobotics.com/


What is MedTech Speed to Data?

Speed-to-data determines go-to-market success for medical devices. You need to inform critical decisions with user data, technical demonstration data, and clinical data. We interview med tech leaders about the critical data-driven decisions they make during their product development projects.

00:00:00:06 - 00:00:03:00
Welcome to MedTech Speed to Data a Key Tech podcast.

00:00:03:09 - 00:00:04:20
I'm your host, Andy Rogers,

00:00:04:20 - 00:00:06:23
VP of Business Development at Key Tech.

00:00:06:23 - 00:00:07:19
Each month, me

00:00:07:19 - 00:00:10:01
and a Key Techer are going to interview a MedTech leader

00:00:10:07 - 00:00:10:22
and talk to them

00:00:10:22 - 00:00:13:00
about the critical data driven decisions

00:00:13:06 - 00:00:16:08
they make in their programs.

00:00:17:18 - 00:00:18:18
All right, welcome everybody

00:00:18:18 - 00:00:21:02
to the next episode of MedTech Speed to Data

00:00:21:12 - 00:00:23:06
a KeyTech Podcast.

00:00:23:06 - 00:00:25:15
Today's guest, Dave Saunders,

00:00:25:23 - 00:00:29:18
CTO of Galen Robotics, a local Baltimore company.

00:00:30:06 - 00:00:31:13
Dave, welcome to the show.

00:00:31:13 - 00:00:33:08
Hey, thanks. It's great to be here.

00:00:33:08 - 00:00:34:12
Yeah, I mean, you're stirring up

00:00:34:12 - 00:00:37:06
a lot of excitement over there in the Carroll Camden area

00:00:37:12 - 00:00:39:01
with the with your startup company.

00:00:39:01 - 00:00:41:10
And you've been in Baltimore for a few years now.

00:00:42:21 - 00:00:43:04
Yeah.

00:00:43:12 - 00:00:46:00
Got a lot to cover here in this episode.

00:00:46:00 - 00:00:47:20
Very excited about it.

00:00:47:20 - 00:00:50:16
Usually we're interviewing maybe CEOs or folks

00:00:50:16 - 00:00:52:16
that are kind of kind of trying to run the company.

00:00:52:16 - 00:00:54:00
And I'm hoping to get into a little bit

00:00:54:00 - 00:00:55:22
more of the weeds with you today.

00:00:55:22 - 00:00:57:10
Not not too much, of course.

00:00:57:10 - 00:00:58:06
Okay.

00:00:58:06 - 00:00:59:11
My first question for you

00:00:59:11 - 00:01:02:16
related to Galen robotics is

00:01:02:16 - 00:01:07:02
what drew you to the company six years ago?

00:01:07:17 - 00:01:09:21
My co-founder and I, Bruce Lichorowic,

00:01:10:11 - 00:01:12:06
we had actually done

00:01:12:06 - 00:01:14:06
another medtech company together.

00:01:15:09 - 00:01:16:10
I actually

00:01:16:10 - 00:01:19:12
have known his family and worked with his brother

00:01:19:12 - 00:01:23:16
back in 1990 at a very early Internet startup.

00:01:23:16 - 00:01:26:11
So I've taken a lot of products to market,

00:01:26:11 - 00:01:31:06
I've done a lot of startups and in 2016

00:01:31:09 - 00:01:35:06
we were approached by the head of

00:01:35:06 - 00:01:38:18
Johns Hopkins Technology Ventures

00:01:38:18 - 00:01:40:16
actually at the

00:01:40:16 - 00:01:44:02
big medtech JPMorgan conference in San Francisco

00:01:44:13 - 00:01:47:10
and he said you know we've got said

00:01:47:22 - 00:01:51:00
we've got this new robotic technology,

00:01:51:00 - 00:01:53:16
we're looking for somebody to commercialize it.

00:01:54:02 - 00:01:56:00
It was developed by Russell Taylor

00:01:56:00 - 00:01:57:02
and I knew who he was.

00:01:57:02 - 00:02:00:11
He's basically, if you've got like,

00:02:00:11 - 00:02:02:23
baseball cards of like who's who in robotics

00:02:03:21 - 00:02:05:03
it all starts with Russ.

00:02:05:03 - 00:02:06:18
And so it was,

00:02:06:18 - 00:02:09:00
that right there got my interest.

00:02:09:00 - 00:02:11:11
And so we came out to Johns Hopkins

00:02:11:11 - 00:02:13:07
and we took a look at everything

00:02:13:07 - 00:02:15:02
and kicked the fairs gears for a few months[1][2]

00:02:15:02 - 00:02:20:15
and licensed the technology and began in San Jose

00:02:21:02 - 00:02:25:01
working out of our homes and we came out here

00:02:26:06 - 00:02:28:22
about one week out of every month

00:02:28:22 - 00:02:33:09
and just began to try to develop the technology.

00:02:33:09 - 00:02:34:03
But it was just

00:02:34:03 - 00:02:36:11
what was really interesting to me was

00:02:36:11 - 00:02:38:16
there are a lot of surgical robots

00:02:38:16 - 00:02:41:04
in the marketplace, like in spine alone,

00:02:41:14 - 00:02:43:10
there are seven surgical robots

00:02:43:10 - 00:02:45:18
just for doing pedicle screws and spine.

00:02:46:01 - 00:02:47:00
So there's actually a lot

00:02:47:00 - 00:02:48:15
more surgical robots out there

00:02:48:15 - 00:02:51:01
than a lot of people realize.

00:02:51:01 - 00:02:53:10
But in spite of how many there are,

00:02:53:10 - 00:02:56:19
there are huge, huge areas of unmet need

00:02:57:18 - 00:03:00:17
where surgeons were literally coming to

00:03:01:03 - 00:03:03:07
the university side of Johns Hopkins,

00:03:03:07 - 00:03:05:08
saying, Where are our tools?

00:03:05:08 - 00:03:07:12
Why don't we have the cool technology?

00:03:08:05 - 00:03:08:14
Right.

00:03:08:14 - 00:03:11:23
And and so this robot really checked

00:03:11:23 - 00:03:14:19
a lot of incredibly important boxes

00:03:16:02 - 00:03:17:07
for

00:03:17:23 - 00:03:19:19
what was needed in the industry.

00:03:19:19 - 00:03:21:00
And it just seemed like something

00:03:21:00 - 00:03:22:20
that could make a lot of impact

00:03:22:20 - 00:03:24:03
for a variety of reasons.

00:03:24:03 - 00:03:25:11
So I was I was really stoked.

00:03:25:11 - 00:03:29:18
And so, yeah, we started the company in 2016.

00:03:29:18 - 00:03:33:15
And then right before COVID we had actually come to

00:03:33:15 - 00:03:34:20
an agreement with

00:03:37:14 - 00:03:39:05
the state of Maryland

00:03:39:05 - 00:03:43:01
and we moved the company headquarters to Baltimore.

00:03:43:01 - 00:03:44:20
And now I'm here.

00:03:45:23 - 00:03:46:22
No, that's great.

00:03:46:22 - 00:03:47:13
It's always good

00:03:47:13 - 00:03:48:07
to hear

00:03:48:07 - 00:03:49:18
the screaming from the mountaintops

00:03:49:18 - 00:03:51:07
from your customers, right?

00:03:51:07 - 00:03:52:14
That's right. Yeah,

00:03:52:14 - 00:03:55:04
So, so as I understand, you know, your prototype,

00:03:55:14 - 00:03:58:06
you know, it's very much a collaborative robot

00:03:58:06 - 00:03:59:17
and we'll talk a little bit more towards the end

00:03:59:17 - 00:04:01:12
about the future of robotics.

00:04:01:12 - 00:04:02:21
But I want to make it clear to our audience

00:04:02:21 - 00:04:05:12
that this is very much a tool

00:04:06:00 - 00:04:08:21
that's collaborating with the human.

00:04:08:21 - 00:04:11:06
It's a machine collaborating with the human.

00:04:11:06 - 00:04:12:07
So why don't you just describe

00:04:12:07 - 00:04:13:09
to our audience real quick,

00:04:13:09 - 00:04:14:15
you know, the make up of the product,

00:04:14:15 - 00:04:16:11
kind of how the user interacts with it

00:04:16:11 - 00:04:18:20
and how it's used in microsurgery.

00:04:18:20 - 00:04:19:06
Sure.

00:04:19:06 - 00:04:19:21
You know,

00:04:19:21 - 00:04:21:08
when you look at surgical robotics,

00:04:21:08 - 00:04:22:06
just to kind of like lay

00:04:22:06 - 00:04:23:04
the groundwork,

00:04:23:04 - 00:04:27:01
you've got kind of a a continuum of types of robots.

00:04:27:01 - 00:04:30:12
And on one far side, you've got things like the robot

00:04:30:12 - 00:04:32:00
that does Lasik surgery,

00:04:32:00 - 00:04:33:16
you know, to improve your vision,

00:04:33:16 - 00:04:35:16
you set it up, you push a button

00:04:35:16 - 00:04:38:04
and then the ophthalmologist goes and drinks a soda,

00:04:38:04 - 00:04:38:20
something like that.

00:04:38:20 - 00:04:40:03
While it's doing its thing,

00:04:40:03 - 00:04:42:14
it's fully autonomous, it's navigated, it

00:04:42:15 - 00:04:43:21
runs by itself.

00:04:43:21 - 00:04:45:08
Once you've set it up

00:04:45:08 - 00:04:47:23
and there are other robots that do similar

00:04:48:00 - 00:04:51:18
kinds of things for knees and hips, and usually bony

00:04:51:18 - 00:04:53:16
robots are autonomous.

00:04:53:16 - 00:04:55:18
And then you've got a category of robots

00:04:55:22 - 00:04:58:14
like The da Vinci, the famous one.

00:04:58:14 - 00:05:00:10
Right. And it's

00:05:01:15 - 00:05:03:19
you could describe it as a collaborative robot,

00:05:03:19 - 00:05:04:05
but it's

00:05:04:05 - 00:05:06:02
but people are more likely

00:05:06:02 - 00:05:08:07
to recognize it as a remote controlled robot.

00:05:08:15 - 00:05:11:12
So you put your hands in these little special controls

00:05:11:12 - 00:05:14:15
and you actually move laparoscopic rods around,

00:05:15:04 - 00:05:19:12
but it is 100% guided by the surgeon in real time.

00:05:20:00 - 00:05:21:22
It has some additional abilities

00:05:21:22 - 00:05:23:03
that are under development

00:05:23:03 - 00:05:26:03
that will do little things on its own here

00:05:26:03 - 00:05:27:13
and there in a very collaborative

00:05:27:13 - 00:05:29:05
kind of back and forth way.

00:05:29:05 - 00:05:31:18
But for the most part, it's a passive robot

00:05:31:18 - 00:05:32:21
that is basically

00:05:32:21 - 00:05:34:23
just extending the hands of the surgeon

00:05:36:09 - 00:05:37:19
for what we're doing.

00:05:37:19 - 00:05:39:02
We had a challenge

00:05:39:02 - 00:05:41:12
where there are a lot of procedures,

00:05:41:12 - 00:05:43:21
especially up in the head and neck,

00:05:43:21 - 00:05:47:05
where a lap, a robot that's been optimized

00:05:47:05 - 00:05:48:02
for laparoscopic

00:05:48:02 - 00:05:51:03
surgery is just not the right solution.

00:05:51:07 - 00:05:54:15
It just won't fit into those kinds of environments.

00:05:54:15 - 00:05:56:23
And so the surgeons needed something

00:05:56:23 - 00:05:58:17
that really didn't.

00:05:58:17 - 00:05:59:19
It's not like they were looking for

00:05:59:19 - 00:06:01:12
a new way to do surgery,

00:06:01:12 - 00:06:04:09
but what they needed was either a third hand

00:06:04:09 - 00:06:05:06
or some way

00:06:05:06 - 00:06:07:13
to really stabilize the instrument

00:06:07:13 - 00:06:09:07
that they were using

00:06:09:07 - 00:06:12:15
and and support the surgeries as they were being done.

00:06:12:23 - 00:06:15:15
So what our robot is is

00:06:15:18 - 00:06:17:19
optimized for is basically

00:06:17:19 - 00:06:19:12
taking a surgeon's instrument

00:06:19:12 - 00:06:23:02
that they would already be using, holding onto it.

00:06:23:11 - 00:06:25:06
And then just like power steering,

00:06:25:06 - 00:06:26:05
you know, when you're in a car

00:06:26:05 - 00:06:28:09
and you turn the steering wheel,

00:06:28:09 - 00:06:31:07
there's a sensor that actually then ultimately,

00:06:31:07 - 00:06:31:14
you know,

00:06:31:14 - 00:06:33:12
feeds into a linkage mechanism

00:06:33:12 - 00:06:35:10
and turns your tires right.

00:06:35:10 - 00:06:38:07
You feel like you're in control, but there's actually

00:06:38:07 - 00:06:39:07
a mechanical assist

00:06:39:07 - 00:06:41:08
that's doing all of the heavy lifting, so to speak.

00:06:41:17 - 00:06:42:16
Well, in this case,

00:06:42:16 - 00:06:45:09
the robot is technically moving the instrument,

00:06:45:09 - 00:06:47:10
even though you're holding on to it,

00:06:47:10 - 00:06:49:17
where you would normally hold on to it.

00:06:49:17 - 00:06:52:04
But the result of that is the instrument is

00:06:52:04 - 00:06:55:05
now extremely stable and

00:06:56:21 - 00:06:58:15
you can even do things like

00:06:58:15 - 00:06:58:23
there's like

00:06:58:23 - 00:07:00:00
a pedal on the floor

00:07:00:00 - 00:07:01:02
that engages the robot

00:07:01:02 - 00:07:03:00
to allow it to follow your hand.

00:07:03:00 - 00:07:04:09
If you let go of the pedal,

00:07:04:09 - 00:07:06:05
you can actually let go of the instrument.

00:07:06:05 - 00:07:07:12
Can't do that normally.

00:07:07:12 - 00:07:08:01
Like if you've got

00:07:08:01 - 00:07:08:21
an instrument down

00:07:08:21 - 00:07:09:20
like in somebody's middle

00:07:09:20 - 00:07:12:07
ear or a biopsy needle in somebody's

00:07:12:07 - 00:07:13:14
brain or whatever,

00:07:13:14 - 00:07:15:13
you can't normally let go of those

00:07:15:13 - 00:07:18:19
and have them be held steady, rock solid, steady.

00:07:19:04 - 00:07:20:13
But now you have this ability.

00:07:20:13 - 00:07:21:11
So not only do

00:07:21:11 - 00:07:22:17
you get assistance

00:07:22:17 - 00:07:24:20
while you're moving the instruments around,

00:07:24:20 - 00:07:27:08
but you also have these new capabilities

00:07:27:08 - 00:07:31:04
for kind of like a third hand that can ergonomically

00:07:31:04 - 00:07:33:13
fit into surgical environments.

00:07:34:12 - 00:07:35:20
That are very, very challenging

00:07:35:20 - 00:07:38:03
just because they're really tight.

00:07:38:03 - 00:07:38:20
You know,

00:07:39:07 - 00:07:41:11
just give me one example and then we'll move on

00:07:41:11 - 00:07:42:22
is imagine

00:07:42:22 - 00:07:43:22
There's a transsphenoidal

00:07:43:22 - 00:07:44:20
a procedure

00:07:44:20 - 00:07:48:02
where they're going up your nostril to basically do

00:07:48:21 - 00:07:50:11
different kinds of brain surgeries,

00:07:50:11 - 00:07:52:15
typically like to remove the pituitary gland

00:07:53:10 - 00:07:54:10
sometimes

00:07:54:10 - 00:07:56:12
because of the requirements of the procedure.

00:07:56:12 - 00:07:59:12
You'll have between two and four surgeons

00:07:59:21 - 00:08:01:09
all cramming their instruments,

00:08:01:09 - 00:08:04:00
plus an endoscope up into your two nostrils.

00:08:04:15 - 00:08:06:19
It's it's horrible, right?

00:08:06:19 - 00:08:07:12
Every you can

00:08:07:12 - 00:08:09:17
only so many people can lean into the table

00:08:09:18 - 00:08:11:08
and reach across like that.

00:08:11:08 - 00:08:13:03
And so those are the environments

00:08:13:03 - 00:08:17:05
where you really need better technology, better tools

00:08:17:11 - 00:08:20:13
to assist the surgeons for what they know how to do.

00:08:20:22 - 00:08:23:11
They just need that kind of leg up

00:08:23:11 - 00:08:24:18
technology wise.

00:08:24:18 - 00:08:27:00
So that's that's where our robot is going after.

00:08:27:15 - 00:08:28:11
Got it. Yeah.

00:08:28:11 - 00:08:30:12
So to speed things up a little bit,

00:08:30:12 - 00:08:33:05
I'm also, sorry, a few things now.

00:08:33:05 - 00:08:34:22
That was great. A great background.

00:08:34:22 - 00:08:36:23
But you know, to a couple other elements.

00:08:36:23 - 00:08:38:12
Number one that I picked up

00:08:38:12 - 00:08:40:08
that you don't have a disposable

00:08:40:08 - 00:08:41:21
like you're designing your

00:08:41:21 - 00:08:45:06
your platform to accommodate off the shelf

00:08:45:18 - 00:08:48:06
surgical tools, which I think is pretty unique

00:08:48:06 - 00:08:49:04
or maybe that's changed.

00:08:49:04 - 00:08:50:16
But the second thing. There is a

00:08:50:16 - 00:08:53:00
disposable in that there is a disposable.

00:08:53:00 - 00:08:55:19
adapter. Yeah, that's fair.

00:08:55:19 - 00:08:56:06
That's right.

00:08:56:06 - 00:08:56:21
But yeah,

00:08:56:21 - 00:08:59:10
the tools themselves you're partnering with

00:09:00:02 - 00:09:02:16
on market products, that's pretty

00:09:02:16 - 00:09:05:12
a great way to speed yourself to market.

00:09:05:12 - 00:09:06:10
And then the other

00:09:06:10 - 00:09:06:23
I think clever

00:09:06:23 - 00:09:09:05
part of of your business that I've read about

00:09:09:05 - 00:09:11:02
and people can read of it up on it

00:09:11:02 - 00:09:12:03
offline is that

00:09:12:03 - 00:09:12:12
you're going

00:09:12:12 - 00:09:13:11
after the subscription

00:09:13:11 - 00:09:15:20
model versus the capital expense.

00:09:15:20 - 00:09:18:05
So it allows you to get in the door easier.

00:09:18:05 - 00:09:21:13
But, but one area that I thought was interesting

00:09:21:13 - 00:09:22:09
and worth talking about

00:09:22:09 - 00:09:26:09
at a high level about your company is that one

00:09:26:09 - 00:09:27:19
there isn't one particular

00:09:27:19 - 00:09:30:10
sliver of the surgical market

00:09:30:10 - 00:09:34:06
that your robot would justify the expense but it's

00:09:34:06 - 00:09:38:13
there's multiple areas in like soft tissue surgery

00:09:38:13 - 00:09:40:03
and the combination of all of them

00:09:40:03 - 00:09:42:09
makes your business viable.

00:09:42:09 - 00:09:43:21
Can you talk a little bit about that?

00:09:43:21 - 00:09:45:12
Yeah. You know,

00:09:45:12 - 00:09:48:20
one of the big I think Achilles heels of robots in

00:09:48:20 - 00:09:50:01
this industry is so

00:09:50:01 - 00:09:52:03
many of them are optimized

00:09:52:03 - 00:09:54:05
for an individual procedure.

00:09:54:05 - 00:09:58:18
So, if you want to do a total knee replacement

00:09:58:18 - 00:10:01:01
there are robots out there for it.

00:10:01:01 - 00:10:03:18
But that robot can't be moved by another department.

00:10:03:18 - 00:10:04:08
It's not going to do

00:10:04:08 - 00:10:05:16
Lasik, it's not going to do pedicle

00:10:05:16 - 00:10:07:21
screws, it's not going to do prostatectomies

00:10:07:21 - 00:10:08:16
and things like that.

00:10:08:16 - 00:10:10:08
And so you end up with a lot of these one

00:10:10:08 - 00:10:12:03
trick ponies out there

00:10:12:03 - 00:10:15:01
that have million dollar plus price tags,

00:10:16:00 - 00:10:18:10
but very narrow utility.

00:10:18:10 - 00:10:20:18
And that's a that's a huge problem in this industry.

00:10:20:18 - 00:10:22:07
Because I'll tell you,

00:10:22:07 - 00:10:24:18
I've talked a lot of hospital administrators

00:10:24:18 - 00:10:27:07
who refer to those things as just giant

00:10:27:07 - 00:10:29:03
fancy dust collectors.

00:10:29:03 - 00:10:32:08
And so with our platform,

00:10:32:08 - 00:10:35:15
by simply changing the instrument that it's holding,

00:10:35:15 - 00:10:38:23
we can potentially move into multiple departments

00:10:38:23 - 00:10:42:04
and provide real value too to the surgeon.

00:10:42:04 - 00:10:45:19
And all that changes is what instrument we're holding.

00:10:45:19 - 00:10:47:16
And there are a lot of opportunities that way.

00:10:47:16 - 00:10:49:17
So it's a great

00:10:49:17 - 00:10:51:09
it's a great opportunity for us.

00:10:51:09 - 00:10:52:18
I've done my homework.

00:10:52:18 - 00:10:55:19
I know your your favorite book was Crossing the Chasm.

00:10:55:19 - 00:10:56:18
So here we go.

00:10:56:18 - 00:10:58:13
We're going to Cross the Chasm.

00:10:58:13 - 00:11:00:09
I have not read it myself, but

00:11:00:09 - 00:11:02:18
you know, the podcast is called Speed to Data here.

00:11:02:18 - 00:11:06:15
So I want to cover what data was most critical

00:11:06:15 - 00:11:08:13
as you were crossing the chasm.

00:11:08:13 - 00:11:09:12
And granted,

00:11:09:12 - 00:11:12:04
we're always in the chasm, so to speak, and

00:11:12:23 - 00:11:14:09
in the world we're in.

00:11:14:09 - 00:11:16:00
But we'll start with,

00:11:16:00 - 00:11:16:10
you know, right

00:11:16:10 - 00:11:18:16
when you started the company, because our audience,

00:11:18:16 - 00:11:19:11
you know, is

00:11:19:11 - 00:11:21:01
clearly at the startup world

00:11:21:01 - 00:11:21:21
where they

00:11:21:21 - 00:11:24:15
maybe are licensing technology like you did or

00:11:24:15 - 00:11:26:21
or even like a global company that sees promise.

00:11:26:21 - 00:11:28:00
And there's,

00:11:28:00 - 00:11:29:02
you know,

00:11:29:02 - 00:11:31:23
a prototype benchtop prototype that shows feasibility.

00:11:31:23 - 00:11:34:01
So there's the early stage

00:11:34:01 - 00:11:35:06
and then there's the stage

00:11:35:06 - 00:11:36:04
where you're kind of in now

00:11:36:04 - 00:11:36:21
like, you know,

00:11:36:21 - 00:11:38:00
hard core product

00:11:38:00 - 00:11:40:03
development, classic product development.

00:11:40:03 - 00:11:42:12
What data was most critical for you

00:11:42:12 - 00:11:44:04
once you got more funding

00:11:44:04 - 00:11:46:04
and then here towards the end and in the future,

00:11:46:04 - 00:11:46:21
more commonly,

00:11:48:04 - 00:11:49:00
what data is and

00:11:49:00 - 00:11:50:13
how is that data going to be leveraged?

00:11:50:13 - 00:11:51:18
So let's start,

00:11:52:07 - 00:11:54:15
you know, day or maybe month

00:11:54:15 - 00:11:57:00
six after you, you know,

00:11:57:00 - 00:11:58:16
stop doing the other work that you're doing.

00:11:58:16 - 00:12:00:23
Maybe in you're all in on on Galen,

00:12:00:23 - 00:12:04:18
what what data was most critical for you

00:12:04:18 - 00:12:08:18
as the CTO and kind of as a company?

00:12:08:18 - 00:12:10:11
To really,

00:12:10:11 - 00:12:12:23
show that this product had viability?

00:12:12:23 - 00:12:13:17
I mean, obviously,

00:12:13:17 - 00:12:15:19
the surgeons were saying, hey, we want the product.

00:12:15:19 - 00:12:18:20
And and Hopkins was happy to license it to you,

00:12:19:08 - 00:12:21:02
but what were you focused on?

00:12:21:02 - 00:12:21:20
Well, you know, it is

00:12:21:20 - 00:12:22:19
it is interesting

00:12:22:19 - 00:12:24:20
in a regulated industry like this

00:12:24:20 - 00:12:26:23
that it's very difficult to

00:12:28:08 - 00:12:31:01
obviously do a thing that smells like pre marketing.

00:12:31:20 - 00:12:33:10
But quite honestly,

00:12:33:10 - 00:12:36:09
you need to identify a clinical application

00:12:36:09 - 00:12:38:18
that has value to the surgeon

00:12:38:18 - 00:12:40:04
and by value to the surgeon.

00:12:40:04 - 00:12:42:18
I mean that they're actually going to go to bat

00:12:42:18 - 00:12:44:06
to get that paid for

00:12:46:19 - 00:12:50:13
and this is true of any industry,

00:12:51:02 - 00:12:53:16
I've taken over 40 products to market

00:12:54:04 - 00:12:55:21
and in every single case

00:12:55:21 - 00:12:58:18
the most important thing has always been

00:12:58:18 - 00:13:01:19
what does the end user actually want to do?

00:13:02:09 - 00:13:03:21
You know,

00:13:03:21 - 00:13:08:18
something that I know drives engineers just bananas is

00:13:08:18 - 00:13:10:12
when product managers just hand off

00:13:10:12 - 00:13:13:06
like a laundry list of features with no context.

00:13:13:06 - 00:13:16:20
No just tell me what they're trying to do

00:13:16:20 - 00:13:21:03
and that is certainly qualitative data

00:13:21:03 - 00:13:24:21
but it's really important and so especially for

00:13:24:21 - 00:13:28:14
for us in medical robotics,

00:13:29:03 - 00:13:30:15
we had to go into surgeries.

00:13:30:15 - 00:13:33:06
We had to see what the surgeons were doing

00:13:33:06 - 00:13:35:05
so that we could in real time

00:13:35:05 - 00:13:38:13
have them tell us, see how much of a pain this is.

00:13:38:13 - 00:13:40:04
Look at what I'm doing right here.

00:13:40:04 - 00:13:42:14
Look at the ergonomics of what I'm trying to do here.

00:13:42:14 - 00:13:46:08
And this is why this is so difficult today.

00:13:46:08 - 00:13:47:12
Right?

00:13:47:12 - 00:13:50:13
And this is why it's so difficult for this surgery

00:13:50:13 - 00:13:51:01
to be done

00:13:51:01 - 00:13:51:18
at a secondary

00:13:51:18 - 00:13:55:11
hospital, because, I have the facilities

00:13:55:11 - 00:13:57:01
and I'm one of the few people

00:13:57:01 - 00:13:59:11
that had the magic hands to get through this.

00:13:59:11 - 00:14:02:11
And yet every other surgeon

00:14:02:11 - 00:14:05:10
that maybe can't qualify to do the procedure,

00:14:05:10 - 00:14:06:23
they know all of it.

00:14:06:23 - 00:14:08:18
they're certainly trained

00:14:08:18 - 00:14:11:10
well enough to know how to do it.

00:14:11:10 - 00:14:13:12
But it's just a little bit of outreach

00:14:13:12 - 00:14:16:06
from from a dexterity or an ergonomic standpoint.

00:14:16:06 - 00:14:18:07
And so we really had to get that under our skin

00:14:18:07 - 00:14:21:08
and understand that, on the other side

00:14:21:08 - 00:14:23:11
of the same coin, I suppose,

00:14:23:11 - 00:14:25:07
is we had to then understand

00:14:26:08 - 00:14:27:11
how that

00:14:27:11 - 00:14:30:08
translated into kind of mechanical numbers.

00:14:31:10 - 00:14:33:15
You know, you take a look at something like and I'm

00:14:33:15 - 00:14:36:07
not trashing the da Vinci in any possible way here.

00:14:36:20 - 00:14:40:05
You know, it's a fantastic system for what it does,

00:14:40:05 - 00:14:43:12
but it is optimized for the kinds of motions

00:14:43:12 - 00:14:46:01
required in laparoscopic surgery, right.

00:14:46:13 - 00:14:50:13
When I'm supporting a procedure

00:14:50:13 - 00:14:52:22
exploratory, of course, because we're pre FDA

00:14:53:16 - 00:14:55:11
but when we're looking at a procedure, say,

00:14:55:11 - 00:14:59:01
for the middle ear, I'm looking at zones

00:14:59:01 - 00:15:00:19
that are less than a millimeter

00:15:00:19 - 00:15:03:12
when I'm trying to like go through like a mastoidectomy

00:15:03:12 - 00:15:06:15
I've got like sometimes a millimeter of clearance

00:15:07:21 - 00:15:10:21
that is going to be either a successful operation

00:15:10:21 - 00:15:14:08
or patient or irreparable patient injury in the case

00:15:14:08 - 00:15:15:18
of middle ear surgery. Right.

00:15:16:23 - 00:15:18:05
For prostatectomy,

00:15:18:05 - 00:15:21:18
nerve sparing technique for doing a colon resection,

00:15:21:18 - 00:15:24:02
you've got a little bit more give, right?

00:15:24:02 - 00:15:26:02
And so the guys engineering

00:15:26:02 - 00:15:28:06
something like a laparoscopic robot,

00:15:28:06 - 00:15:30:03
they don't have the requirement

00:15:30:03 - 00:15:33:15
to like have like 50 microns of precision motion

00:15:34:13 - 00:15:36:10
for their minimal increments

00:15:36:10 - 00:15:38:14
of moving the end effectors.

00:15:38:14 - 00:15:41:04
We do, right.

00:15:41:04 - 00:15:43:20
It would be over engineering for a laparoscopic

00:15:43:20 - 00:15:45:22
robot to dial in their hardware

00:15:45:22 - 00:15:47:21
to the kind of precision that we're doing

00:15:47:21 - 00:15:51:09
because it's unnecessary for laparoscopic procedures.

00:15:51:20 - 00:15:55:17
So understanding what your scale

00:15:55:17 - 00:15:58:19
is and understanding what you need to do

00:15:58:19 - 00:16:00:20
not only from a range standpoint

00:16:00:20 - 00:16:03:03
like what are my potential procedures

00:16:03:03 - 00:16:03:23
that I could be doing

00:16:03:23 - 00:16:06:07
or what are the kinds of things that this platform

00:16:06:07 - 00:16:07:21
could be doing in the future?

00:16:07:21 - 00:16:11:05
And can I reach into those with what I'm making now,

00:16:11:05 - 00:16:14:17
but also having a perspective on where

00:16:14:17 - 00:16:17:14
your current scale of motion,

00:16:18:07 - 00:16:20:19
all of those things relate to, you know, heck,

00:16:20:19 - 00:16:22:18
what's kind of screws you're going to choose

00:16:22:18 - 00:16:23:11
what kind of metal

00:16:23:11 - 00:16:24:14
are you going to choose for the chassis

00:16:24:14 - 00:16:26:02
to to provide enough stiffness?

00:16:26:02 - 00:16:27:03
All of those things

00:16:27:03 - 00:16:30:22
will come down to having that initial understanding

00:16:30:22 - 00:16:32:10
of what kind of scale

00:16:32:10 - 00:16:34:22
am I really trying to achieve here.

00:16:34:22 - 00:16:36:10
And that's critical

00:16:36:10 - 00:16:39:11
because you could really end up either

00:16:39:11 - 00:16:40:04
over engineering

00:16:40:04 - 00:16:42:00
or under engineering a product

00:16:42:00 - 00:16:44:02
and just missing the boat

00:16:44:02 - 00:16:47:20
for your domain of surgeries or procedures

00:16:47:20 - 00:16:48:20
or whatever, right?

00:16:48:20 - 00:16:49:01
Yeah.

00:16:49:01 - 00:16:49:14
No, I mean,

00:16:49:14 - 00:16:50:06
I think

00:16:50:06 - 00:16:53:20
translating market needs into product requirements.

00:16:53:20 - 00:16:55:03
I mean, you just nailed it.

00:16:55:03 - 00:16:56:08
And I totally agree.

00:16:56:08 - 00:16:59:08
You don�t want to over or under engineer your product.

00:16:59:08 - 00:17:03:21
So my my next question here is what steps

00:17:03:21 - 00:17:08:10
did you take to evaluate a university prototype,

00:17:10:09 - 00:17:11:16
to evaluate whether that prototype

00:17:11:16 - 00:17:14:12
could actually meet some of these requirements?

00:17:14:18 - 00:17:15:15
Well, fortunately,

00:17:15:15 - 00:17:18:20
a lot of legwork had been done for us.

00:17:19:11 - 00:17:20:00
But I'll tell you,

00:17:20:00 - 00:17:22:03
one of the one of the most interesting things,

00:17:22:03 - 00:17:23:00
I don't have a prop here.

00:17:23:00 - 00:17:25:09
It probably took me too long to get it.

00:17:25:09 - 00:17:27:10
But one of the interesting things that happened

00:17:27:10 - 00:17:29:04
during the early days of the development

00:17:29:04 - 00:17:33:03
for this technology was another grad student

00:17:33:03 - 00:17:36:14
had actually done kind of a joking YouTube video

00:17:36:14 - 00:17:38:11
where she was actually playing

00:17:38:11 - 00:17:41:01
the old Mattel Operation game

00:17:41:01 - 00:17:44:13
with the da Vinci that they have at Johns Hopkins.

00:17:44:13 - 00:17:47:00
And it's pretty funny to watch, right?

00:17:47:19 - 00:17:50:10
You got this giant $2 million robot and you're

00:17:50:10 - 00:17:55:01
you're plucking out the funny bone from the little

00:17:56:12 - 00:17:57:02
kids toy.

00:17:57:02 - 00:17:57:16
Right.

00:17:58:01 - 00:18:01:08
And Russ Taylor looked at that and he said, well,

00:18:01:08 - 00:18:03:12
you know, that's interesting.

00:18:03:12 - 00:18:07:01
But those pieces are gigantic compared

00:18:07:01 - 00:18:09:02
to the kinds of anatomy

00:18:09:02 - 00:18:11:03
you'd be going after with this robot.

00:18:11:03 - 00:18:13:10
You know, you'd be looking at say, for example,

00:18:14:06 - 00:18:17:07
you're sometimes doing like one potential procedure

00:18:17:07 - 00:18:19:17
is for laryngeal removing like a cyst

00:18:19:17 - 00:18:20:22
from your vocal cords.

00:18:20:22 - 00:18:23:20
You're doing that with a 25 centimeter long instrument

00:18:23:20 - 00:18:25:12
and you're trying to grasp on tissue

00:18:25:12 - 00:18:27:17
by bringing it down into the person's mouth

00:18:27:17 - 00:18:29:17
and grabbing on this one millimeter,

00:18:29:17 - 00:18:31:15
maybe one and a half millimeter polyp.

00:18:31:15 - 00:18:33:15
That's enough to really mess up your voice.

00:18:33:15 - 00:18:35:00
And you're trying to grab on that,

00:18:35:00 - 00:18:37:09
you know, make an incision, all that sort of thing.

00:18:37:09 - 00:18:40:06
So how can you support

00:18:40:06 - 00:18:43:00
those hand motions to make that more precise?

00:18:43:13 - 00:18:45:20
And so instead of the Mattel Monopoly[3] game,

00:18:45:20 - 00:18:48:02
what they ended up developing

00:18:48:02 - 00:18:52:14
was this little piece of sheet metal with a spiral

00:18:52:14 - 00:18:55:20
that was a millimeter the channel, and the spiral was

00:18:55:20 - 00:18:56:17
a millimeter

00:18:57:22 - 00:18:58:22
gap.

00:18:58:22 - 00:19:02:06
And the and the game basically was to take

00:19:02:06 - 00:19:04:01
a laryngeal instrument,

00:19:04:01 - 00:19:05:23
which is about 25 centimeters long.

00:19:05:23 - 00:19:07:21
And you put the tip into the channel

00:19:07:21 - 00:19:09:18
and you had to run it through the channel

00:19:09:18 - 00:19:11:14
without ever touching the sides.

00:19:11:14 - 00:19:14:11
Now, that is very analogous to the kinds of hand

00:19:14:11 - 00:19:17:11
motions that you would do in these narrow

00:19:17:11 - 00:19:18:23
corridor procedures

00:19:18:23 - 00:19:21:09
that you're doing of upper head, neck.

00:19:22:01 - 00:19:24:09
And so just being able to do that

00:19:25:03 - 00:19:26:19
was actually a really big deal.

00:19:26:19 - 00:19:27:02
In fact,

00:19:27:02 - 00:19:28:01
there was a study

00:19:28:01 - 00:19:29:18
that ended up getting published

00:19:29:18 - 00:19:31:18
showing just great results

00:19:31:18 - 00:19:33:09
just by being able to do that.

00:19:33:09 - 00:19:37:02
And we ended up taking our first commercial prototype

00:19:37:02 - 00:19:40:01
of the robot to a otolaryngology

00:19:41:00 - 00:19:42:16
educational conference.

00:19:42:16 - 00:19:44:13
And we had over 70

00:19:45:10 - 00:19:49:10
ENT Surgeon Department heads come into it

00:19:49:10 - 00:19:52:19
by invitation only demo.

00:19:52:19 - 00:19:55:04
And we actually had them play the game

00:19:56:15 - 00:19:59:10
and we had people their jaws are on the floor.

00:19:59:10 - 00:20:04:04
They're like, Holy cow, we only had one person

00:20:04:04 - 00:20:07:22
that could actually beat the robot freehand

00:20:07:22 - 00:20:11:06
and they couldn't do it repeatedly.

00:20:11:06 - 00:20:13:11
So just so they had one good shot, right?

00:20:13:11 - 00:20:15:18
They did one good thing.

00:20:15:18 - 00:20:18:02
But that was but that was great because what

00:20:18:02 - 00:20:21:13
it was what that really helped us be able to see

00:20:21:13 - 00:20:24:22
was that even the less nerdy people in the company

00:20:24:22 - 00:20:27:23
could go look at what we're helping surgeons

00:20:27:23 - 00:20:30:23
do that was something that we could really point at.

00:20:30:23 - 00:20:33:16
And then by using, camera vision and things

00:20:33:16 - 00:20:36:05
like that, we're able to actually measure

00:20:36:05 - 00:20:38:20
motion of the tool inside the spiral.

00:20:38:20 - 00:20:40:00
And that's how we were able to

00:20:40:00 - 00:20:42:12
then eventually quantify

00:20:42:12 - 00:20:44:13
how much we were stabilizing the instrument.

00:20:45:06 - 00:20:46:07
But, you know,

00:20:46:07 - 00:20:50:03
just being able to as funny as it sounds,

00:20:50:03 - 00:20:54:15
being able to build the equivalent of a kid's game

00:20:55:14 - 00:20:56:06
and actually

00:20:56:06 - 00:20:59:12
use that as a mechanism for,

00:20:59:12 - 00:21:03:15
validating the function of the tool with surgeons.

00:21:03:15 - 00:21:04:13
It just clicked.

00:21:04:13 - 00:21:06:21
It just every one of the surgeons was like,

00:21:06:21 - 00:21:09:11
holy cow, this, you know, not only will

00:21:09:11 - 00:21:10:11
this make my life easier,

00:21:10:11 - 00:21:11:07
this will make it easier

00:21:11:07 - 00:21:12:15
for me to train residents

00:21:12:15 - 00:21:13:19
because they'll spend

00:21:13:19 - 00:21:16:22
less time focusing on all of the annoying techniques

00:21:16:22 - 00:21:17:21
for mitigating hand

00:21:17:21 - 00:21:19:08
tremor and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

00:21:19:08 - 00:21:22:11
And they're going to focus on clinical effectiveness.

00:21:22:11 - 00:21:25:01
How do I do the surgery correctly? Right.

00:21:25:01 - 00:21:25:19
And so it was

00:21:25:19 - 00:21:27:22
it was huge for us to be able to

00:21:27:22 - 00:21:30:10
to be able to make that connection.

00:21:30:10 - 00:21:30:22
We still do.

00:21:30:22 - 00:21:31:09
Yeah.

00:21:31:09 - 00:21:32:06
It's such a great story

00:21:32:06 - 00:21:35:11
that I mean, it's not rocket science here

00:21:35:11 - 00:21:36:02
to the extent

00:21:36:02 - 00:21:40:04
you can use the benchtop prototype that you inherit

00:21:40:04 - 00:21:43:12
or even mock up yourself and,

00:21:43:12 - 00:21:46:20
have your end users use that.

00:21:46:20 - 00:21:48:23
And there's either published data

00:21:48:23 - 00:21:51:18
or if you can use computer vision, as you said, to,

00:21:51:18 - 00:21:52:11
to show

00:21:52:11 - 00:21:54:08
technically that you're going to meet

00:21:54:08 - 00:21:56:16
a few of those key requirements,

00:21:56:16 - 00:21:59:08
then, you have that data and you're ready

00:21:59:08 - 00:22:00:23
to talk to investors

00:22:00:23 - 00:22:03:06
and say there's a market need.

00:22:03:06 - 00:22:06:05
You have some technical feasibility here, you're ready

00:22:06:05 - 00:22:09:13
to form for a real company and actually proceed

00:22:09:13 - 00:22:10:15
with product development,

00:22:10:15 - 00:22:13:22
which leads me deep into the chasm now

00:22:15:04 - 00:22:16:17
now that we're we're in it.

00:22:16:17 - 00:22:18:10
You've been doing it for a few years.

00:22:18:10 - 00:22:20:19
And if I may

00:22:20:19 - 00:22:23:07
ask the question again, so our audience is

00:22:23:07 - 00:22:24:09
is developing these

00:22:24:09 - 00:22:26:12
these medical devices just like you are.

00:22:26:12 - 00:22:29:06
You know what data has maybe to phrase it,

00:22:29:06 - 00:22:29:23
you know what

00:22:29:23 - 00:22:30:14
data has been

00:22:30:14 - 00:22:34:14
the hardest to capture or most critical

00:22:34:14 - 00:22:35:19
for you

00:22:35:19 - 00:22:38:15
to get through the woods in in product development?

00:22:38:19 - 00:22:41:14
Well, I'll give you another leather example.[4][5]

00:22:41:14 - 00:22:42:19
Just a quick story.

00:22:42:19 - 00:22:45:02
So we took the benchtop version

00:22:45:02 - 00:22:46:20
that Johns Hopkins had developed

00:22:46:20 - 00:22:49:21
and we tried to turn it into kind of like the first

00:22:49:21 - 00:22:51:10
prettier looking prototype.

00:22:51:10 - 00:22:53:16
And I think you actually saw that.

00:22:53:16 - 00:22:56:18
And so the the main guts of this

00:22:56:18 - 00:22:59:19
technology is a Delta parallel robot.

00:23:00:09 - 00:23:01:03
And

00:23:02:21 - 00:23:06:09
the original version is actually relatively small

00:23:06:09 - 00:23:08:14
and so to get it into the surgical field,

00:23:08:14 - 00:23:12:02
another student at the school is as one of their own.

00:23:12:02 - 00:23:13:20
I think it was a masters project.

00:23:13:20 - 00:23:15:17
They'd actually built this mobile base

00:23:15:17 - 00:23:17:07
that would actually hold

00:23:17:07 - 00:23:20:02
the Delta robot and move it into position.

00:23:20:02 - 00:23:21:05
So we took what we knew,

00:23:21:05 - 00:23:22:18
we took what had already been done,

00:23:22:18 - 00:23:23:22
and we just made it look,

00:23:23:22 - 00:23:26:14
we made it a little bit bigger

00:23:26:14 - 00:23:29:03
and we made it look a little prettier.

00:23:29:03 - 00:23:31:14
And we took it to this conference and

00:23:31:14 - 00:23:34:13
ergonomically it was completely unusable.

00:23:34:13 - 00:23:36:09
And the reason for that is

00:23:36:09 - 00:23:38:10
and we'd completely forgotten about this

00:23:39:13 - 00:23:40:16
otolaryngologists

00:23:40:16 - 00:23:44:07
so rhinologists, laryngologist, otologists

00:23:44:07 - 00:23:46:10
they're using surgical microscopes

00:23:46:10 - 00:23:49:10
that are like right here and the robot is supposed to

00:23:49:10 - 00:23:52:05
then also come into the basically the same area

00:23:52:22 - 00:23:55:12
and it's supposed to ergonomically fit

00:23:55:12 - 00:23:56:13
into the environment

00:23:56:13 - 00:23:59:15
that you already have well, that Delta,

00:23:59:15 - 00:24:02:12
which we ended up calling the flying trashcan,

00:24:02:12 - 00:24:04:12
was banging into the microscope.

00:24:04:12 - 00:24:06:08
We completely forgotten

00:24:06:08 - 00:24:10:11
about this critical environment that was in the O.R.

00:24:10:11 - 00:24:10:20
We're like,

00:24:10:20 - 00:24:12:11
well, is it taking up too much floor space?

00:24:12:11 - 00:24:14:10
I mean, we had all these KPIs

00:24:14:10 - 00:24:16:03
that were important,

00:24:16:03 - 00:24:19:00
but we completely forgotten about the air space

00:24:19:00 - 00:24:22:15
being occupied by the meat and potatoes of the robot.

00:24:22:15 - 00:24:25:11
And so this this really goes back to.

00:24:25:11 - 00:24:27:08
Yeah, I mean, we

00:24:27:08 - 00:24:28:23
I'm not sure that that really

00:24:28:23 - 00:24:31:19
was going to end up being the final product anyway,

00:24:32:20 - 00:24:34:04
but it was

00:24:34:04 - 00:24:37:01
a bit of a, oh, gosh, what are we going to do now?

00:24:37:23 - 00:24:39:19
And you need those kind of failures.

00:24:39:19 - 00:24:41:22
You know, honestly,

00:24:41:22 - 00:24:45:04
I get nervous talking to potential users

00:24:45:04 - 00:24:46:18
and potential customers and things like that

00:24:46:18 - 00:24:48:22
and not having at least somebody

00:24:48:22 - 00:24:50:04
tell me that I'm an idiot

00:24:50:04 - 00:24:53:10
and this is not going to work and you're a moron.

00:24:53:10 - 00:24:54:15
And this is why, right?

00:24:54:15 - 00:24:56:17
If I can't find somebody like that, I get stuck.

00:24:56:17 - 00:24:58:08
I start getting fidgety because I'm like,

00:24:58:08 - 00:25:00:11
I don't like it when people just like

00:25:00:11 - 00:25:02:02
they're either being polite

00:25:02:02 - 00:25:04:00
and just, like, going, Oh, yeah, that'll be beautiful.

00:25:04:00 - 00:25:06:17
I'd love to see your robot.

00:25:07:16 - 00:25:10:12
You got to find somebody that goes, you screwed

00:25:10:12 - 00:25:12:06
this up dude, and here's why.

00:25:12:06 - 00:25:13:18
And so,

00:25:13:18 - 00:25:16:10
even though it was a little discouraging

00:25:16:10 - 00:25:17:15
we pivoted really fast

00:25:17:15 - 00:25:19:10
and we came up with a newer design

00:25:19:10 - 00:25:20:13
that actually

00:25:20:13 - 00:25:23:12
meets more needs than the original intention anyway.

00:25:23:12 - 00:25:25:13
So it was a great discovery

00:25:26:13 - 00:25:28:19
but you need to have some failures.

00:25:28:19 - 00:25:29:08
You got it

00:25:29:08 - 00:25:32:17
if you're not getting some kind of negative feedback.

00:25:32:17 - 00:25:33:14
And I mean,

00:25:33:14 - 00:25:36:02
and I mean somebody actually like getting in your face

00:25:36:02 - 00:25:37:14
and giving you four letter words, telling you

00:25:37:14 - 00:25:39:18
how badly you screwed up with your prototype.

00:25:39:18 - 00:25:41:13
If you can't find at least one person

00:25:41:13 - 00:25:42:18
that does that, you're

00:25:42:18 - 00:25:44:17
probably not even trying hard enough

00:25:44:17 - 00:25:46:22
with what you're developing in the first place.

00:25:47:08 - 00:25:49:04
And you just keep...

00:25:49:04 - 00:25:53:14
Yeah, I know. So can you give our audience an idea

00:25:53:14 - 00:25:56:17
for like how frequently you would poll,

00:25:56:17 - 00:26:00:01
market leaders for this kind of feedback.

00:26:00:01 - 00:26:01:00
It's just like quarterly.

00:26:01:00 - 00:26:02:01
You would kind of try

00:26:02:01 - 00:26:03:11
to get in front of stakeholders

00:26:03:11 - 00:26:06:14
and go out beyond Hopkins, at what clip

00:26:06:14 - 00:26:07:20
were you getting this content?

00:26:07:20 - 00:26:09:23
Constantly.

00:26:09:23 - 00:26:12:21
Bruce and I are doing at least

00:26:12:21 - 00:26:16:04
one really in-depth demo with a KOL

00:26:17:07 - 00:26:19:16
each month, that's a minimum.

00:26:19:16 - 00:26:21:23
In the beginning, it was probably

00:26:21:23 - 00:26:25:00
at least once a week, and we were and in some cases

00:26:25:00 - 00:26:25:21
we're going to well,

00:26:25:21 - 00:26:28:11
the first year Bruce and I were on a plane

00:26:28:11 - 00:26:32:12
all the time, so we were in every major hospital

00:26:32:12 - 00:26:33:11
showing them, look,

00:26:33:11 - 00:26:35:23
this is the technology we're developing

00:26:35:23 - 00:26:37:14
and we're trying to figure it out.

00:26:37:14 - 00:26:38:23
You know, are we going in the right place?

00:26:38:23 - 00:26:39:21
And, you know,

00:26:39:21 - 00:26:43:19
how would this solve your problems?

00:26:43:19 - 00:26:46:06
We were getting in front of as many people as possible

00:26:46:06 - 00:26:49:04
and just, showing them technology. Right.

00:26:49:04 - 00:26:50:15
Because we didn't

00:26:50:15 - 00:26:51:07
at that point,

00:26:51:07 - 00:26:53:05
I didn't even have a rollout strategy for a product.

00:26:53:05 - 00:26:56:05
It was really still raw technology,

00:26:57:00 - 00:26:59:04
but we were validating it constantly.

00:26:59:04 - 00:27:00:19
Just making sure that we're going in

00:27:00:19 - 00:27:01:16
the right direction

00:27:01:16 - 00:27:03:18
was is this going to solve your problem?

00:27:04:01 - 00:27:06:08
So we hear you loud and clear. You want

00:27:07:13 - 00:27:08:09
rapid and

00:27:08:09 - 00:27:09:17
constant customer feedback

00:27:09:17 - 00:27:10:16
and you want people to tell you

00:27:10:16 - 00:27:12:03
you're doing the wrong things.

00:27:12:03 - 00:27:15:06
If you have to build a prototype with papier mach�,

00:27:15:06 - 00:27:16:12
do it.

00:27:16:12 - 00:27:18:11
You know, don't don't wait for,

00:27:18:11 - 00:27:20:01
you know, all the fancy actuators

00:27:20:01 - 00:27:20:20
and you know,

00:27:20:20 - 00:27:22:14
for the motors to come in from wherever

00:27:22:14 - 00:27:24:21
you're sourcing them from and that kind of stuff

00:27:24:21 - 00:27:26:07
do whatever it takes.

00:27:26:07 - 00:27:26:19
In fact, there

00:27:26:19 - 00:27:30:02
literally were paper mach� mockups done

00:27:30:02 - 00:27:33:12
before the original Mark Zero was produced at

00:27:33:12 - 00:27:34:05
Johns Hopkins.

00:27:34:05 - 00:27:36:04
So I'm not even kidding

00:27:36:04 - 00:27:39:02
when I say papier mach�, whatever it takes

00:27:39:18 - 00:27:41:23
get a mock up made and get feedback.

00:27:41:23 - 00:27:44:05
So you're on your way to market.

00:27:44:05 - 00:27:47:13
And if I were, if I recall, that's de novo, right?

00:27:47:13 - 00:27:49:19
So and then talk a little bit about

00:27:51:06 - 00:27:52:02
using on the

00:27:52:02 - 00:27:55:02
market tools with your consumable.

00:27:55:02 - 00:27:56:14
What does that look like?

00:27:56:14 - 00:27:58:14
You know, that was a big deal.

00:27:58:14 - 00:27:59:20
We've got enough challenges

00:27:59:20 - 00:28:01:02
with the technology that we're building.

00:28:01:02 - 00:28:03:13
We didn't want to become instrument manufacturers.

00:28:03:13 - 00:28:05:10
You know, there's Teleflex and Integra.

00:28:05:10 - 00:28:06:15
There's plenty of folks out there

00:28:06:15 - 00:28:08:09
that make perfectly fine.

00:28:08:09 - 00:28:09:20
You know, Johann Grasper

00:28:09:20 - 00:28:12:05
and scissors and forceps and all this kind of stuff.

00:28:13:14 - 00:28:14:23
Who wants to go into that business?

00:28:14:23 - 00:28:15:12
Right.

00:28:16:10 - 00:28:19:02
And so what was really important

00:28:19:02 - 00:28:21:00
was that we could meet the surgeons

00:28:21:00 - 00:28:22:14
where they are with the instruments

00:28:22:14 - 00:28:23:22
they already know how to use.

00:28:23:22 - 00:28:26:16
And so that was to me, that's a huge

00:28:26:16 - 00:28:28:01
for at least for us,

00:28:28:01 - 00:28:30:08
it ends up being a huge piece of the puzzle

00:28:30:08 - 00:28:31:22
in terms of customer adoption

00:28:31:22 - 00:28:33:00
and customer acceptance,

00:28:33:00 - 00:28:34:15
because we're not asking them

00:28:34:15 - 00:28:35:22
to do a procedure differently.

00:28:35:22 - 00:28:37:11
We're not even asking them necessarily

00:28:37:11 - 00:28:40:00
to use a different instrument

00:28:40:00 - 00:28:42:16
because of FDA regulatory.

00:28:42:16 - 00:28:45:13
You know, we have to specify exactly

00:28:45:13 - 00:28:47:01
what instrument we're holding

00:28:47:01 - 00:28:48:14
like down to the part number

00:28:48:14 - 00:28:49:18
so right now,

00:28:49:18 - 00:28:51:06
I'm only going to be supporting one

00:28:51:06 - 00:28:52:15
brand of instrument,

00:28:52:15 - 00:28:54:23
but over time, we could be supporting,

00:28:54:23 - 00:28:57:01
you know, any arbitrary number of instruments.

00:28:57:01 - 00:28:59:14
And it's just it's a surreal process over time.

00:29:00:17 - 00:29:02:14
But that's huge for us

00:29:02:14 - 00:29:05:15
because it means that we don't have to spend a lot of

00:29:05:15 - 00:29:07:18
we don't have to burn a lot of calories

00:29:07:18 - 00:29:10:20
trying to figure out how to reinvent the instrument

00:29:10:20 - 00:29:12:00
that's already out there.

00:29:12:00 - 00:29:13:03
They're class one instruments.

00:29:13:03 - 00:29:15:14
They're already cleared. It's great.

00:29:15:14 - 00:29:16:21
And so by supporting them

00:29:16:21 - 00:29:19:18
and by giving them more capability,

00:29:20:12 - 00:29:22:07
you know, my favorite analogy is always,

00:29:22:07 - 00:29:23:21
chocolate stands on its own.

00:29:23:21 - 00:29:25:00
Peanut butter stands on its own.

00:29:25:00 - 00:29:27:00
You put them together and it's my favorite candy

00:29:27:00 - 00:29:29:19
and to me, this technology

00:29:29:19 - 00:29:32:06
is that kind of peanut butter cup solution

00:29:32:21 - 00:29:36:02
because we're taking two standalone technologies

00:29:36:02 - 00:29:37:03
and we're bringing them together

00:29:37:03 - 00:29:39:08
and creating a new solution

00:29:39:08 - 00:29:41:01
that does not exist on its own.

00:29:41:01 - 00:29:42:12
And I think that's great

00:29:42:12 - 00:29:44:01
if you can do something like that.

00:29:44:01 - 00:29:45:11
I think it's a huge win.

00:29:45:11 - 00:29:46:01
Let's talk a little bit

00:29:46:01 - 00:29:47:22
more about testing with the users.

00:29:47:22 - 00:29:51:15
so there's this hybrid between market research and,

00:29:51:15 - 00:29:53:22
you know, papier mach� and,

00:29:55:03 - 00:29:57:12
kind of like more formative evaluations.

00:29:57:12 - 00:30:01:08
And so I noticed that your your product has a GUI

00:30:01:08 - 00:30:03:03
a separate screen.

00:30:03:03 - 00:30:03:22
Can you talk a little bit

00:30:03:22 - 00:30:06:19
about how the surgeon interacts with the screen,

00:30:06:19 - 00:30:09:10
how you determined kind of what goes on the screen?

00:30:09:22 - 00:30:12:12
And I assume that it's different for each procedure.

00:30:12:23 - 00:30:16:10
Yeah, we obviously, the name of the game

00:30:16:10 - 00:30:18:10
is to keep your user interface

00:30:18:10 - 00:30:20:19
not looking like DOS or Windows 3.1.

00:30:20:19 - 00:30:22:06
So you don't just like cram

00:30:22:06 - 00:30:25:02
every icon under the screen that you possibly can

00:30:25:02 - 00:30:27:15
so it needed to be very, very clean.

00:30:27:15 - 00:30:30:01
It's a touch screen interface

00:30:30:01 - 00:30:33:15
and it's as adaptive as it possibly can be.

00:30:33:15 - 00:30:35:21
So if you're doing a laryngeal procedure,

00:30:35:21 - 00:30:37:06
you're only going to be presented

00:30:37:06 - 00:30:38:23
with laryngeal instruments.

00:30:38:23 - 00:30:40:11
And then eventually as we add

00:30:40:11 - 00:30:44:08
other surgical disciplines by adding other instruments

00:30:44:23 - 00:30:47:14
that are used in those other disciplines,

00:30:48:01 - 00:30:51:14
you would log in and say, I'm doing neurosurgery

00:30:51:14 - 00:30:52:00
and here's

00:30:52:00 - 00:30:54:07
my selection of supported neurosurgery instruments.

00:30:55:02 - 00:30:58:19
And so that keeps the clutter down significantly

00:30:59:20 - 00:31:03:04
when you're actually doing a procedure or,

00:31:03:04 - 00:31:05:21
testing the robot or doing a trial or whatever

00:31:07:19 - 00:31:10:14
we try again, we want to keep the information

00:31:10:14 - 00:31:12:00
that's on the screen

00:31:12:00 - 00:31:15:18
usable and actionable, but not like just,

00:31:15:18 - 00:31:18:17
you know, a ton of telemetry and numbers,

00:31:18:17 - 00:31:21:06
you know, zipping along like The Matrix,

00:31:21:06 - 00:31:24:09
but have things be very, very simple and

00:31:24:10 - 00:31:26:04
and easy to see.

00:31:26:04 - 00:31:28:22
So when you're moving the robot around we�ll show you

00:31:28:22 - 00:31:31:21
where the instrument is within the surgical workflow.

00:31:32:06 - 00:31:33:20
Yeah, for the most part,

00:31:33:20 - 00:31:37:01
you probably don't even need that information.

00:31:37:01 - 00:31:38:17
But sometimes if the

00:31:38:17 - 00:31:40:12
if the robot is is draped,

00:31:40:12 - 00:31:41:06
you might not know

00:31:41:06 - 00:31:43:23
that you're at the edge of your work space,

00:31:43:23 - 00:31:44:16
that sort of thing.

00:31:44:16 - 00:31:46:23
So it is kind of it can occasionally be useful

00:31:46:23 - 00:31:49:07
to look over the screen and go, oh, I'm over,

00:31:49:14 - 00:31:51:15
but maybe I need to shift my robot six

00:31:51:15 - 00:31:53:01
inches to the left or something like that

00:31:53:01 - 00:31:55:14
because I'm just I'm in a weird space ergonomically.

00:31:55:22 - 00:31:59:03
So we've got that kind of feedback, but

00:32:00:05 - 00:32:01:10
we just want to keep it as

00:32:01:10 - 00:32:04:01
clean as possible

00:32:05:10 - 00:32:06:15
and

00:32:07:12 - 00:32:10:11
you know, just avoid it.

00:32:12:00 - 00:32:13:11
How do I usually put this?

00:32:13:11 - 00:32:16:02
I think one of the frustrations from a lot of surgeons

00:32:16:02 - 00:32:17:20
is that a lot of surgical robots

00:32:17:20 - 00:32:20:03
kind of become the centerpiece of the O.R.

00:32:20:16 - 00:32:23:02
instead of the surgeon

00:32:24:01 - 00:32:25:10
and so we want to be

00:32:25:10 - 00:32:26:11
a piece of equipment

00:32:26:11 - 00:32:30:02
that's there to serve the surgeon, not turn it into

00:32:30:02 - 00:32:32:03
the surgeon is there to serve the robot,

00:32:32:03 - 00:32:33:05
you know what I mean?

00:32:33:14 - 00:32:36:23
And so it's all about what can we provide

00:32:36:23 - 00:32:41:08
that is easy to digest and is not distracting to it.

00:32:41:08 - 00:32:44:09
To go along the terminology of being simple, like

00:32:44:09 - 00:32:47:12
the surgeon can always override the robot.

00:32:47:12 - 00:32:49:15
Is that fair? OK, absolutely. Yeah.

00:32:50:05 - 00:32:50:14
Yeah.

00:32:50:14 - 00:32:52:22
Like there's gain controls and things like that.

00:32:53:10 - 00:32:56:03
So, you know, you can slow down

00:32:56:03 - 00:32:57:10
the robot's response

00:32:57:10 - 00:32:59:20
if you're in a really, really tight situation.

00:32:59:20 - 00:33:01:08
You're just like, I just don't

00:33:01:08 - 00:33:03:08
I don't want the instrument to move

00:33:03:10 - 00:33:06:11
as fast as it could potentially move in,

00:33:06:11 - 00:33:08:06
and in free space,

00:33:08:06 - 00:33:10:18
I want the robot to slow me down sometimes.

00:33:10:18 - 00:33:11:09
That's actually

00:33:11:09 - 00:33:14:11
what the surgeon wants and so are there's slider bars

00:33:14:11 - 00:33:15:08
that they can jump to that

00:33:15:08 - 00:33:16:23
just say, you know, drop the

00:33:16:23 - 00:33:18:17
top level of the gain down.

00:33:19:20 - 00:33:22:01
And it's, you know,

00:33:22:01 - 00:33:23:10
that's something that they pick up

00:33:23:10 - 00:33:26:13
during the training process, which is a very short

00:33:27:06 - 00:33:27:18
process.

00:33:27:18 - 00:33:29:18
In fact, we've got another

00:33:29:18 - 00:33:32:18
big usability study coming up in a few weeks.

00:33:33:07 - 00:33:34:11
And

00:33:35:09 - 00:33:37:11
this round of surgeons, like the last time

00:33:37:11 - 00:33:38:13
they get about 2 hours

00:33:38:13 - 00:33:40:13
worth of training for the user interface.

00:33:40:13 - 00:33:44:09
And then they're there in a cadaver doing work.

00:33:44:09 - 00:33:46:06
And they seem to be picking it up

00:33:46:06 - 00:33:48:18
really, really quickly.

00:33:48:18 - 00:33:50:23
But yeah, it's important to

00:33:52:00 - 00:33:53:23
especially with something like a surgical robot,

00:33:53:23 - 00:33:56:10
you need to make sure that there's enough

00:33:56:10 - 00:33:58:08
you want to keep things simple.

00:33:58:08 - 00:33:59:08
But at the same time,

00:33:59:08 - 00:34:01:09
you want to make sure that the power users

00:34:01:09 - 00:34:03:03
or somebody who's had their hands on the robot

00:34:03:03 - 00:34:04:19
for a few weeks and they start to go,

00:34:04:19 - 00:34:06:20
you know, I like the default,

00:34:06:20 - 00:34:07:22
but I just want to have it

00:34:07:22 - 00:34:10:04
feel a little bit, whatever in my hand.

00:34:10:04 - 00:34:10:19
I want it

00:34:10:19 - 00:34:12:09
I want to give me a little bit more resistance

00:34:12:09 - 00:34:14:02
or I want it to be a little bit looser.

00:34:14:02 - 00:34:17:23
Let them make those changes as long as you can do so.

00:34:19:01 - 00:34:21:04
Obviously in a safe and efficacious manner,

00:34:22:06 - 00:34:24:12
depending on however your hardware works.

00:34:24:12 - 00:34:26:11
But the settings are important,

00:34:26:11 - 00:34:30:08
but you can't just like blast them in the faces of

00:34:30:08 - 00:34:32:04
of the user either. Got it.

00:34:32:04 - 00:34:32:09
All right.

00:34:32:09 - 00:34:35:18
So we've covered who Galen Robotics is.

00:34:35:18 - 00:34:38:06
We've covered what data is critical.

00:34:38:06 - 00:34:39:05
And it's clear,

00:34:39:05 - 00:34:40:11
you know, you need to market need

00:34:40:11 - 00:34:42:09
you need to test within users.

00:34:42:09 - 00:34:44:10
And to the extent that

00:34:44:10 - 00:34:46:16
you have technical demonstration already

00:34:46:16 - 00:34:47:07
out of the box

00:34:47:07 - 00:34:49:06
with the technology or licensing that,

00:34:49:06 - 00:34:51:10
that certainly helps give you the confidence

00:34:51:10 - 00:34:53:21
and you transition into formal product development.

00:34:54:19 - 00:34:56:20
And so the next section here is

00:34:57:10 - 00:34:57:21
just kind of

00:34:57:21 - 00:35:00:06
classic product development questions for you.

00:35:01:05 - 00:35:02:15
So the first question,

00:35:02:15 - 00:35:04:04
a lot of these startup companies

00:35:04:04 - 00:35:05:19
that we talk with are,

00:35:05:19 - 00:35:08:20
in the exploratory phase, like a phase zero

00:35:08:20 - 00:35:10:19
and at what point did

00:35:10:19 - 00:35:13:20
you know that Galen was ready to go from phase zero

00:35:14:08 - 00:35:16:14
to formal product development?

00:35:17:01 - 00:35:19:02
I mean, because you're building

00:35:19:02 - 00:35:20:19
this airplane as you're flying it.

00:35:20:19 - 00:35:24:04
When did you lock, product requirements?

00:35:24:04 - 00:35:26:03
What were you looking for?

00:35:26:13 - 00:35:29:05
You know, when we came back from that that big

00:35:29:05 - 00:35:30:16
otolaryngology conference,

00:35:31:19 - 00:35:33:07
we clearly knew that that we

00:35:33:07 - 00:35:35:08
had some work to do on the requirements,

00:35:35:08 - 00:35:37:02
although I guess maybe the requirements

00:35:37:02 - 00:35:39:04
themselves were relatively stable,

00:35:39:04 - 00:35:41:21
but it was the engineering output response

00:35:41:21 - 00:35:42:23
to those requirements

00:35:42:23 - 00:35:46:08
that really needed to be changed.

00:35:46:08 - 00:35:47:23
But but we knew

00:35:47:23 - 00:35:50:04
we had some we still had some work to do.

00:35:51:02 - 00:35:53:12
I think when we had our Mark 2 prototype

00:35:53:12 - 00:35:56:16
and we started putting it in front of people's

00:35:56:16 - 00:35:58:18
you know, putting in front of people again, and doing,

00:35:58:18 - 00:36:01:04
you know, phantoms and just different studies.

00:36:02:21 - 00:36:05:05
That was when the feedback was coming back

00:36:05:05 - 00:36:06:12
and it was like, oh,

00:36:06:12 - 00:36:08:00
I love how this does this

00:36:08:00 - 00:36:10:04
and if you could support this or

00:36:10:04 - 00:36:12:08
if the four sensor was a little bit more durable,

00:36:12:08 - 00:36:14:00
I could put this bigger instrument.

00:36:14:00 - 00:36:16:18
Suddenly the kind of feedback was come

00:36:16:18 - 00:36:18:09
to us in the context of

00:36:19:14 - 00:36:23:05
I believe in what you've done as a base model here.

00:36:23:05 - 00:36:23:13
And so

00:36:23:13 - 00:36:26:06
I'm now able to start thinking a little bit beyond

00:36:26:06 - 00:36:28:05
what you've what you've given me

00:36:28:05 - 00:36:29:20
and that's when we

00:36:29:20 - 00:36:33:03
I would say anecdotally knew that we were we were

00:36:33:03 - 00:36:36:22
we were ready to like start moving more aggressively

00:36:37:16 - 00:36:39:23
into commercialization.

00:36:39:23 - 00:36:41:12
Now, how do you quantify that?

00:36:41:12 - 00:36:44:01
I mean, that's that's pretty tricky,

00:36:44:01 - 00:36:46:18
that comes down to the whole

00:36:46:18 - 00:36:48:03
talking to customers and

00:36:48:03 - 00:36:49:15
and making sure that those requirements

00:36:49:15 - 00:36:51:12
are really reflections of

00:36:51:12 - 00:36:53:20
what is it the user wants to do.

00:36:53:20 - 00:36:55:08
And that's important.

00:36:55:08 - 00:36:59:02
You've got to and it takes you know, we've done those

00:37:00:04 - 00:37:03:04
we do those we've actually done requirement

00:37:03:04 - 00:37:06:19
reviews company wide where we've had

00:37:07:09 - 00:37:09:00
almost every single person in the company

00:37:09:00 - 00:37:10:12
sitting down as we would walk

00:37:10:12 - 00:37:12:15
through one requirement after another

00:37:12:15 - 00:37:13:04
and actually

00:37:13:04 - 00:37:16:15
even like sometimes hash out semantics going

00:37:16:15 - 00:37:17:16
yeah but is this

00:37:17:16 - 00:37:20:07
is this requirement really describing what it is that

00:37:20:07 - 00:37:21:07
we're trying to achieve

00:37:22:14 - 00:37:25:23
and you know, it takes

00:37:25:23 - 00:37:27:07
more than one person in the room

00:37:27:07 - 00:37:28:04
to do that sort of thing.

00:37:28:04 - 00:37:31:22
So we made sure that that,

00:37:31:22 - 00:37:35:23
everybody had at least visibility into that process.

00:37:35:23 - 00:37:37:15
So it was tough.

00:37:37:15 - 00:37:38:18
It was tough.

00:37:38:18 - 00:37:39:19
It sounds like there was a little bit

00:37:39:19 - 00:37:41:18
of like a gut feeling that,

00:37:41:18 - 00:37:43:18
you're on to something and,

00:37:43:18 - 00:37:44:05
you read it,

00:37:44:05 - 00:37:46:00
you're ready to lock requirements

00:37:46:00 - 00:37:49:20
and you've got this combination of agreement

00:37:49:20 - 00:37:51:04
from the market.

00:37:51:04 - 00:37:53:13
Plus now you have a team

00:37:53:13 - 00:37:54:07
and you sort of

00:37:54:07 - 00:37:55:14
it sounds like you crowd source

00:37:55:14 - 00:37:57:20
reviewed your requirements. I think that's great.

00:37:58:07 - 00:38:00:09
You know, rather than just having the engineers,

00:38:00:16 - 00:38:02:00
put requirements together

00:38:02:00 - 00:38:03:19
and then just proceed with product

00:38:03:19 - 00:38:05:13
with design control development,

00:38:05:13 - 00:38:08:05
you get to this infinite loop of making design changes

00:38:08:05 - 00:38:09:10
you have to document

00:38:09:10 - 00:38:10:21
and then you find,

00:38:10:21 - 00:38:13:04
user needs come out of left field and then your

00:38:13:04 - 00:38:14:16
you have to go back to phase zero.

00:38:14:16 - 00:38:17:09
So I like how you at least focused on the end user

00:38:17:09 - 00:38:19:22
and then crowd sourced, your requirements.

00:38:19:22 - 00:38:21:19
So we're pretty technical company here.

00:38:21:19 - 00:38:24:00
I'm going to ask a couple software

00:38:24:00 - 00:38:25:16
related questions here.

00:38:25:16 - 00:38:27:22
Dave, I remember on one of the other podcasts

00:38:28:09 - 00:38:31:16
you said that surgical robots are close to 80%

00:38:31:16 - 00:38:32:21
software anyways.

00:38:32:21 - 00:38:36:20
So can you talk a little bit about the software

00:38:37:04 - 00:38:40:01
and what you licensed from Hopkins

00:38:40:01 - 00:38:42:18
and clearly you know this is a public forum here.

00:38:42:18 - 00:38:44:08
We don't need to get into the details of the control

00:38:44:08 - 00:38:45:11
algorithms and things like that.

00:38:45:11 - 00:38:46:12
But you know other

00:38:46:12 - 00:38:48:03
startup companies are inheriting

00:38:48:03 - 00:38:50:13
SOUP �software of unknown pedigree�. Right.

00:38:50:21 - 00:38:53:08
So how has this software evolved

00:38:53:16 - 00:38:55:23
from when you first started to where we are today?

00:38:56:10 - 00:38:59:18
As as nicely as I can say this, the software

00:38:59:18 - 00:39:01:02
that was handed over to us from

00:39:01:02 - 00:39:03:07
the university was for demo purposes only.

00:39:04:16 - 00:39:06:15
There's no way that it was

00:39:06:15 - 00:39:09:02
going to just roll straight into commercialization.

00:39:10:07 - 00:39:11:18
It definitely demonstrated to us

00:39:11:18 - 00:39:13:21
that things like the algorithms were understood

00:39:13:21 - 00:39:15:04
you know, there's math

00:39:15:04 - 00:39:16:01
with kinematics

00:39:16:01 - 00:39:18:10
and things like that that can be really tricky.

00:39:18:10 - 00:39:21:09
And so the software as it exists

00:39:21:09 - 00:39:23:04
certainly provided proof

00:39:23:04 - 00:39:26:21
that those algorithms had been sufficiently vetted.

00:39:26:21 - 00:39:29:12
And so there were guts in there that were good.

00:39:30:15 - 00:39:32:19
But, you know,

00:39:32:19 - 00:39:36:04
grad students and all of that working

00:39:36:04 - 00:39:39:09
on different class projects and things

00:39:39:09 - 00:39:40:02
like that.

00:39:40:02 - 00:39:41:23
They're not having these big architecture

00:39:41:23 - 00:39:44:18
meetings deciding how to like modularly produce

00:39:45:18 - 00:39:49:00
software for for a gizmo

00:39:49:06 - 00:39:51:21
that�s being developed inside of a university.

00:39:52:06 - 00:39:55:22
So it was it was spaghetti

00:39:56:09 - 00:40:00:14
soup, spaghetti, and it was it was rough.

00:40:00:14 - 00:40:01:19
And so

00:40:01:19 - 00:40:03:04
we had the challenge

00:40:03:04 - 00:40:05:09
of not only moving development forward,

00:40:05:09 - 00:40:08:03
but also re-architecting it live.

00:40:08:16 - 00:40:11:09
And so our Director of Software Engineering,

00:40:11:17 - 00:40:14:05
I think, did a just an incredible job.

00:40:14:23 - 00:40:18:15
In fact, we've been able to add in some additional,

00:40:18:15 - 00:40:21:00
future features for demo purposes

00:40:21:12 - 00:40:25:01
that he was able to drop in within days

00:40:25:11 - 00:40:29:10
because the code has become so much more robust

00:40:29:10 - 00:40:30:20
and modularized.

00:40:31:19 - 00:40:32:19
And that was critical.

00:40:32:19 - 00:40:37:02
But you know, my warning to anybody

00:40:37:11 - 00:40:39:07
that is going to license code

00:40:39:07 - 00:40:41:06
is the code is going to show you that

00:40:41:06 - 00:40:43:09
technologically it's feasible

00:40:43:09 - 00:40:45:22
but do not expect that you're just going to like slap

00:40:45:22 - 00:40:48:17
some new icons on the code and then take it to market.

00:40:48:17 - 00:40:51:08
It is not ready for that.

00:40:51:08 - 00:40:55:09
And as good as you might hope it is

00:40:55:09 - 00:40:57:09
and you might interview some post-grad,

00:40:57:09 - 00:40:58:18
it seems like just the savant

00:40:58:18 - 00:41:00:13
for coding or something like that.

00:41:00:13 - 00:41:03:05
You just I think it's a bad idea

00:41:03:05 - 00:41:06:12
to even assume that, the code looks great,

00:41:06:12 - 00:41:08:03
Well, no, it doesn't.

00:41:08:03 - 00:41:10:19
You need to formally go through it

00:41:11:05 - 00:41:15:22
on your side of the fence and you need to treat it

00:41:15:22 - 00:41:18:10
as a prototype and you need to,

00:41:18:10 - 00:41:20:05
you need to work it out and make it your own

00:41:22:18 - 00:41:23:16
see what you got there.

00:41:23:16 - 00:41:23:21
Yeah.

00:41:23:21 - 00:41:26:15
So it's a six degrees of freedom robot

00:41:27:04 - 00:41:29:07
and looking at the patents and whatnot

00:41:29:07 - 00:41:33:19
it�s a series of transducers and sensors

00:41:33:19 - 00:41:34:15
in an array

00:41:34:15 - 00:41:36:07
and you collect all this data

00:41:36:07 - 00:41:38:12
and it helps guide the user.

00:41:38:12 - 00:41:41:14
But can you talk maybe,

00:41:41:14 - 00:41:43:11
philosophically on the control

00:41:43:11 - 00:41:44:02
algorithm, like,

00:41:44:02 - 00:41:47:13
for example, how does the robot differentiate between,

00:41:48:00 - 00:41:50:15
a hand tremor that's not intentional

00:41:50:15 - 00:41:54:15
and an intended movement from the from the surgeon?

00:41:55:05 - 00:41:56:18
Or does it just filter out,

00:41:56:18 - 00:41:58:04
you know, micro hand movement?

00:41:58:04 - 00:42:00:14
And so it turns out from the literature

00:42:01:15 - 00:42:03:23
that naturally occurring hand tremor

00:42:03:23 - 00:42:07:07
actually has a very specific cycle to it.

00:42:07:07 - 00:42:09:09
It's actually around 50 to 60 hertz

00:42:11:08 - 00:42:14:18
weirdly, as that number is as a coincidence.

00:42:14:18 - 00:42:19:04
But so certainly the first approach is really just,

00:42:19:04 - 00:42:22:19
filter out that that that that jitter

00:42:22:19 - 00:42:24:01
because you just don't need it. Right.

00:42:25:09 - 00:42:25:22
I'm going to

00:42:25:22 - 00:42:26:12
move from point

00:42:26:12 - 00:42:28:19
A to point B, I don't need all this fuzz.

00:42:29:17 - 00:42:30:20
So that turned out to actually

00:42:30:20 - 00:42:33:02
be a relatively simple solution.

00:42:33:12 - 00:42:36:15
But then yeah, then it gets into

00:42:37:02 - 00:42:37:14
the control

00:42:37:14 - 00:42:40:14
algorithms, gets way more complex from there.

00:42:40:14 - 00:42:42:21
Because you still are asking,

00:42:43:16 - 00:42:46:06
the kinematics to follow your hand

00:42:46:17 - 00:42:49:02
and you wanted to do it naturally. Right?

00:42:49:02 - 00:42:52:04
And so you don't want to feel the, the ground grind and pop

00:42:52:04 - 00:42:53:18
from each of those individual motors

00:42:53:18 - 00:42:56:08
as it's trying to decide to go into the next position

00:42:56:08 - 00:42:57:15
as it's following,

00:42:57:15 - 00:42:58:06
you know, whatever

00:42:58:06 - 00:43:00:12
vector travel your hand is going through.

00:43:01:13 - 00:43:03:20
So that's where it gets rough.

00:43:03:20 - 00:43:06:22
And in fact, we have a person who's a Ph.D.

00:43:06:22 - 00:43:11:08
in hand controls and that's all he does

00:43:11:08 - 00:43:15:06
is just tuning the feel of,

00:43:15:06 - 00:43:17:23
of moving the instrument along while you're holding it

00:43:18:16 - 00:43:21:13
so that it just it feels as natural.

00:43:21:13 - 00:43:25:11
And I often use the when it's not feeling good,

00:43:25:19 - 00:43:29:00
especially in the early days, I describe it as crunchy

00:43:29:18 - 00:43:31:17
as you were actually trying to move the instrument.

00:43:31:17 - 00:43:32:20
You could almost feel

00:43:32:20 - 00:43:33:21
almost felt like you were like

00:43:33:21 - 00:43:36:07
dragging it across a gravel road.

00:43:36:07 - 00:43:38:19
And that's, we could get into why that is,

00:43:38:19 - 00:43:40:12
but that's you know, just that's it.

00:43:40:12 - 00:43:43:06
That's a response factor of all the individual motors

00:43:43:06 - 00:43:44:03
trying to like

00:43:44:03 - 00:43:46:11
move into the next position kinematically

00:43:47:05 - 00:43:48:15
as you're traveling along.

00:43:48:15 - 00:43:52:09
And so getting that to feel natural was rough.

00:43:52:09 - 00:43:54:11
And it's an ongoing process, honestly.

00:43:54:22 - 00:43:58:13
It will we'll always be tweaking and tuning that

00:43:58:13 - 00:44:00:07
you know, based on different

00:44:01:22 - 00:44:03:13
applications.

00:44:03:13 - 00:44:04:02
The tuning

00:44:04:02 - 00:44:07:08
might change depending on the procedure type.

00:44:07:08 - 00:44:09:17
So the tuning is currently fine

00:44:09:17 - 00:44:13:02
for our laryngeal indication, which is our first

00:44:13:19 - 00:44:15:02
go to market.

00:44:15:02 - 00:44:18:03
It might be different when you're doing neurosurgery

00:44:18:03 - 00:44:19:02
I don't know.

00:44:19:16 - 00:44:21:05
So that's that's something we have to explore.

00:44:21:05 - 00:44:22:04
But that

00:44:22:04 - 00:44:24:07
That's actually where it gets rough.

00:44:24:07 - 00:44:25:18
Canceling out hand tremor

00:44:25:18 - 00:44:26:23
turns out to actually be pretty easy.

00:44:26:23 - 00:44:29:09
So I'm just curious when you get into V & V,

00:44:30:02 - 00:44:32:00
there's the essential performance requirements,

00:44:32:00 - 00:44:34:17
and I would imagine your essential performance is,

00:44:35:00 - 00:44:36:15
you know, reduced

00:44:36:15 - 00:44:40:04
hand tremor aid surgeon positioning by X,

00:44:40:13 - 00:44:43:23
either dimension or percent, whatever.

00:44:44:10 - 00:44:45:05
Are you, I'm curious,

00:44:45:05 - 00:44:49:05
are you developing a robot to test your robot

00:44:49:05 - 00:44:51:02
or are you using

00:44:51:02 - 00:44:53:04
how are you actually verifying that.

00:44:54:02 - 00:44:58:14
A lot of it is is hand feel because if it doesn't feel

00:44:58:14 - 00:45:00:16
good to the surgeon,

00:45:00:16 - 00:45:02:21
it really doesn't matter what your numbers are.

00:45:02:21 - 00:45:04:15
It still has to feel good

00:45:04:15 - 00:45:06:19
because this is a cooperatively controlled robot.

00:45:07:18 - 00:45:09:04
If it was fully autonomous, I

00:45:09:04 - 00:45:10:18
could probably get away with something

00:45:10:18 - 00:45:12:22
a little bit more automated.

00:45:12:22 - 00:45:14:05
But in a lot of ways,

00:45:14:05 - 00:45:15:21
we have to take it through the processes

00:45:15:21 - 00:45:16:18
with a human being.

00:45:16:18 - 00:45:18:12
At the controls stick

00:45:18:12 - 00:45:21:10
because because there is that qualitative factor, it's

00:45:21:10 - 00:45:24:06
got to feel right

00:45:24:06 - 00:45:26:06
or it doesn't matter what the math says.

00:45:26:06 - 00:45:27:16
So that was a challenge for us.

00:45:27:16 - 00:45:28:22
And that doesn't necessarily apply

00:45:28:22 - 00:45:30:07
to all surgical robots.

00:45:30:07 - 00:45:32:20
I'm going to ask a second part of that question

00:45:32:20 - 00:45:35:17
as we enter the final round of our podcast here.

00:45:36:04 - 00:45:38:14
We we use a lightning round now.

00:45:38:14 - 00:45:39:04
I'm going to call it,

00:45:39:04 - 00:45:40:16
questions from Key Techers.

00:45:40:16 - 00:45:42:01
So to get on the market,

00:45:42:01 - 00:45:44:05
medical devices need to be safe and effective.

00:45:44:05 - 00:45:47:01
So you just described a way to measure

00:45:47:13 - 00:45:49:17
efficacy, right? It's got to feel right.

00:45:49:17 - 00:45:55:01
But how do you justify safety when you have this tool

00:45:55:01 - 00:45:59:12
on that's mounted on something that could very easily

00:45:59:12 - 00:46:01:04
move very fast

00:46:01:04 - 00:46:02:18
in a direction you don't want it to go?

00:46:02:18 - 00:46:05:08
So there are philosophically, how are you

00:46:05:08 - 00:46:06:23
justifying the safety here.

00:46:06:23 - 00:46:08:06
That is part of your tuning

00:46:08:06 - 00:46:09:05
is that you've got to

00:46:09:05 - 00:46:11:04
you have to understand what those bounds are

00:46:11:04 - 00:46:16:13
for normal intended motions like a surgeon that is,

00:46:17:04 - 00:46:18:02
got an instrument

00:46:18:02 - 00:46:19:07
buried down into somebody's

00:46:19:07 - 00:46:21:11
larynx isn't going to do this.

00:46:21:11 - 00:46:23:04
It's never going to happen.

00:46:23:04 - 00:46:24:15
And so you've got to find some way

00:46:24:15 - 00:46:25:13
of characterizing

00:46:25:13 - 00:46:26:10
what that unwanted

00:46:26:10 - 00:46:27:17
motion would look like

00:46:27:17 - 00:46:28:09
and make sure

00:46:28:09 - 00:46:30:07
that you are basically restricting

00:46:30:07 - 00:46:35:05
those motions within normal bounds for that procedure.

00:46:35:05 - 00:46:38:07
So you do have to put numbers to things like that.

00:46:38:07 - 00:46:41:00
But yeah, there's another great

00:46:41:00 - 00:46:42:15
example is when you're doing

00:46:42:15 - 00:46:44:14
something like a mastoidectomy,

00:46:44:14 - 00:46:48:16
you�re drilling with 80,000 RPM, glorified dremel tool.

00:46:49:05 - 00:46:50:00
And

00:46:50:23 - 00:46:54:03
the mastoid is not solid bone.

00:46:54:03 - 00:46:56:04
It looks like a it looks like an English muffin.

00:46:56:04 - 00:46:58:11
There's like nooks and crannies all over the place.

00:46:58:11 - 00:46:59:18
And one of the biggest risks

00:46:59:18 - 00:47:02:00
that you have with a handheld drill

00:47:02:00 - 00:47:03:00
is that you open up

00:47:03:00 - 00:47:04:08
one of these nooks and crannies

00:47:04:08 - 00:47:07:06
and your drill can actually, like, dive in.

00:47:07:06 - 00:47:10:03
And inside of that little pocket

00:47:10:03 - 00:47:12:04
could be one of two facial nerves.

00:47:12:04 - 00:47:13:09
It could be a blood vessel.

00:47:13:09 - 00:47:15:18
There's a lot of real dangerous stuff inside

00:47:15:18 - 00:47:19:04
the mastoid just waiting for you to to expose it.

00:47:19:16 - 00:47:22:20
And so, you know understanding

00:47:22:20 - 00:47:24:07
and this isn't something that we currently do

00:47:24:07 - 00:47:28:11
because we're not supporting a drill yet commercially.

00:47:28:11 - 00:47:29:20
This is something that we're doing

00:47:29:20 - 00:47:32:04
as research for this technology.

00:47:32:04 - 00:47:35:01
But understanding what a normal drilling

00:47:35:01 - 00:47:36:17
motion would look like versus

00:47:36:17 - 00:47:39:04
the thing jerking out of your hand,

00:47:39:04 - 00:47:40:22
that's something that you can actually

00:47:40:22 - 00:47:42:17
you don't even need machine learning for that.

00:47:42:17 - 00:47:43:06
That is something

00:47:43:06 - 00:47:46:06
you can actually write an algorithm to and go where

00:47:46:23 - 00:47:49:19
if the surgeon says, you know, turn on anti jerk,

00:47:51:08 - 00:47:53:20
don't let the tool jerk out of my hand.

00:47:53:20 - 00:47:56:15
And that is a motion that you can characterize.

00:47:56:15 - 00:47:59:04
And it's a motion that is unwanted. Right?

00:47:59:04 - 00:48:02:01
It is very easy to get any otologist

00:48:02:01 - 00:48:03:18
just to sit down and go

00:48:03:18 - 00:48:05:22
I don't want a tool jerking out of my hand.

00:48:05:22 - 00:48:06:18
OK, well, what is it?

00:48:06:18 - 00:48:08:05
What is what is jerking out of your hand

00:48:08:05 - 00:48:08:23
look like

00:48:08:23 - 00:48:10:05
actually characterizing

00:48:10:05 - 00:48:11:03
that mathematically

00:48:11:03 - 00:48:13:19
and squelching that potential motion out

00:48:14:13 - 00:48:15:22
from the robot's repertoire.

00:48:15:22 - 00:48:19:12
That's where we add safety to manual instruments

00:48:19:12 - 00:48:22:09
that cannot be achieved under normal means.

00:48:22:22 - 00:48:24:14
So yeah, it sounds like your your

00:48:24:14 - 00:48:26:06
your first launch is implementing

00:48:26:06 - 00:48:28:15
these safety features that don't exist with humans.

00:48:29:07 - 00:48:32:16
So that's a great sort of baseline platform

00:48:32:16 - 00:48:34:11
launch and then, you know,

00:48:34:11 - 00:48:36:17
let's talk a little bit more about the future

00:48:36:17 - 00:48:38:00
with autonomy.

00:48:38:00 - 00:48:39:17[6]
And you need to collect the data

00:48:39:17 - 00:48:41:13
from each procedure eventually and use it.

00:48:41:13 - 00:48:44:08
But what you have the motion.

00:48:44:19 - 00:48:45:13
I guess talk a little bit

00:48:45:13 - 00:48:47:11
more about what data you're collecting

00:48:47:11 - 00:48:49:00
or potentially going to collect with this product

00:48:49:00 - 00:48:50:11
when it's on the market

00:48:50:11 - 00:48:53:01
and maybe an idea of what what where

00:48:53:01 - 00:48:53:18
the first couple

00:48:53:18 - 00:48:56:06
layers of autonomy you'd want to go to market with.

00:48:56:19 - 00:48:59:06
I'll give you a little I'll give you a hint.

00:48:59:06 - 00:49:01:22
If you look at something that has been done by

00:49:01:22 - 00:49:04:07
Dr. Greg Hager in the computer science department

00:49:04:07 - 00:49:05:14
at Johns Hopkins

00:49:05:14 - 00:49:07:18
since 2006, he's been working on something

00:49:07:18 - 00:49:09:13
called the language of surgery.

00:49:09:13 - 00:49:12:18
And one of the examples of his research involves

00:49:12:18 - 00:49:16:04
basically having a evaluation algorithm

00:49:16:04 - 00:49:19:01
tied to the hand controls of a da Vinci.

00:49:19:08 - 00:49:22:08
And it can almost instantly tell you

00:49:22:15 - 00:49:26:13
if how experienced the user is that has their hands

00:49:26:13 - 00:49:27:23
in the control system

00:49:27:23 - 00:49:30:00
that can be applied all over the place.

00:49:30:07 - 00:49:32:08
And so one of the things that we want to do

00:49:32:08 - 00:49:35:17
is as we're collecting all the motion data from

00:49:35:17 - 00:49:37:06
the surgeon that's driving

00:49:38:22 - 00:49:39:23
the robot

00:49:39:23 - 00:49:42:23
is actually looking at the efficiency of hand motions

00:49:43:04 - 00:49:44:18
and how can we help support

00:49:44:18 - 00:49:47:04
what they ultimately want to do

00:49:47:04 - 00:49:49:07
even without, even with like, you know,

00:49:49:07 - 00:49:51:05
tremor control and things like that,

00:49:51:05 - 00:49:52:03
there's still going to be

00:49:52:03 - 00:49:54:04
an inefficiency of of motion.

00:49:54:10 - 00:49:55:18
Are there ways

00:49:55:18 - 00:49:57:21
that we can actually tighten that envelope

00:49:57:21 - 00:49:59:06
and make the instrument

00:49:59:06 - 00:50:02:15
do what we can tell the surgeon is really trying to do

00:50:03:02 - 00:50:06:00
and help them dial in the instruments

00:50:06:05 - 00:50:08:06
so that they're just going straight for,

00:50:08:06 - 00:50:10:07
the disease tissue or whatever it is.

00:50:10:16 - 00:50:14:06
And we can actually glean a lot of that

00:50:14:06 - 00:50:15:18
from just the motion data.

00:50:15:18 - 00:50:18:15
So that, to me is is really cool.

00:50:19:00 - 00:50:21:15
Because that's that's that's fruit that can be done

00:50:22:10 - 00:50:25:17
algorithmically because, machine learning in surgical

00:50:25:17 - 00:50:28:04
robots is not something that's going to go together

00:50:29:07 - 00:50:30:05
in the foreseeable

00:50:30:05 - 00:50:33:17
future because there is no clearance path with the FDA

00:50:34:02 - 00:50:37:17
for basically having machine learning guide a

00:50:38:14 - 00:50:41:03
a robotic system that is holding a weapon

00:50:41:13 - 00:50:42:18
because that's really what

00:50:42:18 - 00:50:44:19
now they're looking at it right now. Right.

00:50:44:19 - 00:50:46:22
And so there's so much that we can do

00:50:47:01 - 00:50:49:14
just by looking at the motion data and saying,

00:50:49:14 - 00:50:52:10
how can we dial it in and really ultimately do

00:50:52:18 - 00:50:55:20
what the surgeons are trying to do in the first place

00:50:55:20 - 00:50:59:14
and actually be able to tighten that motion envelope.

00:50:59:14 - 00:51:00:21
And so I think that's pretty exciting.

00:51:00:21 - 00:51:03:23
But second to that is

00:51:04:12 - 00:51:07:19
we have been exploring ways of adding

00:51:07:19 - 00:51:10:20
even though we're using existing surgical instruments

00:51:10:20 - 00:51:13:04
without modifying the instrument,

00:51:13:04 - 00:51:16:19
how can we effectively add sensor data to the use of

00:51:16:19 - 00:51:17:21
the instrument itself?

00:51:17:21 - 00:51:20:21
Like, for example, if we were holding a drill

00:51:21:20 - 00:51:23:06
with the robot,

00:51:23:06 - 00:51:25:03
is there a way that we can actually tell

00:51:25:03 - 00:51:26:05
how much pressure

00:51:26:05 - 00:51:27:07
is being applied

00:51:27:07 - 00:51:29:23
between patient tissue and the tip of the drill?

00:51:29:23 - 00:51:31:08
And what kinds of things

00:51:31:08 - 00:51:33:15
can we improve for the surgeon by that?

00:51:33:15 - 00:51:34:18
Like, for example,

00:51:34:18 - 00:51:37:01
can we make sure that if you're like in the middle ear

00:51:37:01 - 00:51:39:08
and you're doing something called a stapedectomy,

00:51:39:08 - 00:51:42:00
can I make sure that you can't push the drill so hard

00:51:42:00 - 00:51:43:21
that you actually break the stapes

00:51:43:21 - 00:51:45:01
or the stapes foot plate,

00:51:45:01 - 00:51:47:06
which is a really bad thing to have happen?

00:51:48:05 - 00:51:51:02
Or or if I'm drilling those nooks and crannies

00:51:51:02 - 00:51:52:01
I was talking about

00:51:52:01 - 00:51:54:08
and I've got pressure from the drill,

00:51:54:08 - 00:51:56:11
and then suddenly I'm in outer space

00:51:56:11 - 00:51:57:12
and there's no pressure.

00:51:57:12 - 00:51:59:19
There's no resistance to the tip of the drill.

00:51:59:19 - 00:52:02:08
Can I slow down the response of the drill

00:52:02:08 - 00:52:04:11
just to make sure that it doesn't plunge?

00:52:04:11 - 00:52:07:16
And these are all things that we can do with

00:52:08:01 - 00:52:11:09
with by adding maybe a little bit of additional sensor

00:52:11:09 - 00:52:12:17
that might go into like a

00:52:12:17 - 00:52:15:02
the the instrument adapter itself.

00:52:15:02 - 00:52:17:03
So so the instrument adapter

00:52:17:03 - 00:52:18:18
might have additional sensors on it

00:52:18:18 - 00:52:21:11
that just gives us better information

00:52:21:11 - 00:52:23:19
about how the tool is being used and

00:52:24:19 - 00:52:26:10
what kind of tissue response

00:52:26:10 - 00:52:27:23
we're getting from the tool.

00:52:27:23 - 00:52:30:16
And again, these are things that you cannot do

00:52:31:07 - 00:52:34:20
in any meaningful way with a manually held instrument.

00:52:35:02 - 00:52:38:18
So the cool thing about this whole industry is that

00:52:38:18 - 00:52:41:22
robots are actually giving you access to information

00:52:41:22 - 00:52:44:03
about how surgeries are being done.

00:52:44:03 - 00:52:45:16
That has been anecdotal

00:52:45:16 - 00:52:48:17
for literally thousands of years.

00:52:48:17 - 00:52:51:03
And now suddenly we can actually get

00:52:51:03 - 00:52:54:04
we can put numbers to hand motions,

00:52:54:04 - 00:52:56:13
we can put numbers to, you know,

00:52:57:18 - 00:52:59:20
tissue contact and all those sorts of things.

00:52:59:20 - 00:53:00:16
That is that

00:53:00:16 - 00:53:02:06
even if you could have collected it

00:53:02:06 - 00:53:03:18
now ten years ago or something like that,

00:53:03:18 - 00:53:04:16
it would have been useless

00:53:04:16 - 00:53:07:04
because you're still holding the instrument manually.

00:53:07:04 - 00:53:09:08
So what are you going to do? Right.

00:53:09:08 - 00:53:13:00
And so, that's to us, that's really exciting

00:53:13:00 - 00:53:15:05
because that also opens the door to

00:53:15:14 - 00:53:18:11
what if we were talking to a nerve root monitor?

00:53:18:22 - 00:53:20:11
Well, the way that we're currently works

00:53:20:11 - 00:53:22:11
is you hear a beep and you stop your hand.

00:53:22:11 - 00:53:25:12
While we were talking directly to the nerve monitor,

00:53:25:12 - 00:53:29:06
we could get a signal from it and we could stop you

00:53:29:06 - 00:53:31:22
in a way that the human hand cannot match.

00:53:31:22 - 00:53:34:08
And so there's all kinds of safety capabilities

00:53:34:08 - 00:53:36:02
that we could do

00:53:36:02 - 00:53:38:09
just by being more connected in the O.R.

00:53:38:09 - 00:53:39:22
And to me, that's what

00:53:39:22 - 00:53:42:05
that's what I find really exciting because

00:53:42:05 - 00:53:43:10
I'm not a roboticist.

00:53:43:10 - 00:53:45:03
We've got expert roboticists here.

00:53:45:03 - 00:53:46:04
That's not my thing.

00:53:46:04 - 00:53:50:01
My thing is what kinds of applications can we provide

00:53:50:01 - 00:53:51:23
using this robot as a platform?

00:53:51:23 - 00:53:53:23
And that's really where we take this in the future.

00:53:54:12 - 00:53:56:18
And that's that's cool to me. I love that stuff.

00:53:57:18 - 00:53:58:00
Yeah.

00:53:58:00 - 00:53:58:19
I hadn�t appreciate it until

00:53:58:19 - 00:53:59:15
right here until the end

00:53:59:15 - 00:54:01:11
where you keep talking about safety.

00:54:01:11 - 00:54:03:08
And when you think about devices

00:54:03:08 - 00:54:04:17
yeah, they say safety and efficacy,

00:54:04:17 - 00:54:07:08
but kind of the engineer in us always kind of jumps

00:54:07:08 - 00:54:09:10
to, well, how effective is it?

00:54:09:10 - 00:54:12:14
And you kind of, downplay safety in a way.

00:54:12:14 - 00:54:13:20
Just want to check that box.

00:54:13:20 - 00:54:17:06
But your platform in surgical robotics in general,

00:54:17:06 - 00:54:20:16
it sounds like safety almost could be more important

00:54:21:02 - 00:54:23:17
in what you're preventing than the efficacy.

00:54:24:13 - 00:54:25:16
Oh, heck, yeah.

00:54:25:16 - 00:54:28:09
You know, one of one of Russ Taylor's,

00:54:28:09 - 00:54:31:09
famous phrases is the biggest risk of surgical robots

00:54:31:17 - 00:54:33:13
is that it does exactly the right thing,

00:54:33:13 - 00:54:35:07
but in the wrong place.

00:54:35:07 - 00:54:38:16
And we think of that all the time.

00:54:38:16 - 00:54:39:23
You know, in our code, it's

00:54:39:23 - 00:54:43:09
just it's baked in our DNA nine lines out of ten

00:54:43:20 - 00:54:46:20
in the in the software code are about double

00:54:46:20 - 00:54:48:20
checking what you're about to do and and safety

00:54:48:20 - 00:54:50:03
and all those sorts of things.

00:54:50:03 - 00:54:53:01
And so, yeah, sometimes we almost take it for granted

00:54:53:01 - 00:54:56:03
because it's such an integral part of everything

00:54:56:03 - 00:54:57:18
that you tell the robot to do.

00:54:57:18 - 00:55:00:15
You got to make sure that it's doing it safely.

00:55:00:23 - 00:55:02:23
And that's got to be your baseline

00:55:03:05 - 00:55:05:10
and then build on top of that.

00:55:05:10 - 00:55:06:12
But yeah, absolutely.

00:55:06:12 - 00:55:07:13
The safety part

00:55:07:13 - 00:55:11:19
and the opportunities for making surgery safer,

00:55:11:19 - 00:55:14:08
although man, that's a difficult indication to prove

00:55:14:19 - 00:55:17:15
from a marketing clearance standpoint.

00:55:17:20 - 00:55:19:20
But that's got to be your guiding light,

00:55:19:20 - 00:55:20:19
I think, because that's

00:55:20:19 - 00:55:22:17
where the opportunities really are.

00:55:22:17 - 00:55:24:08
Two more questions for you.

00:55:24:08 - 00:55:25:19
And this one's a little bit of a curveball,

00:55:25:19 - 00:55:26:08
but I like this.

00:55:26:08 - 00:55:29:02
When we polled the audience, the Key Techers here

00:55:29:05 - 00:55:32:00
are there certain actions, surgical actions

00:55:32:15 - 00:55:36:10
that a human is dramatically better than a robot

00:55:36:10 - 00:55:37:15
at doing?

00:55:37:21 - 00:55:40:21
As you see it now, or humans

00:55:41:12 - 00:55:43:23
losing and they've already lost?

00:55:43:23 - 00:55:46:10
Well, I think one is

00:55:47:02 - 00:55:48:02
where that where the robot

00:55:48:02 - 00:55:50:20
I think is better is actually stabilizing instruments.

00:55:50:20 - 00:55:51:11
I think

00:55:51:11 - 00:55:53:13
I think a robot is better capable of holding

00:55:53:13 - 00:55:56:01
something steady and never getting tired

00:55:56:10 - 00:55:57:20
that a human being is.

00:55:57:20 - 00:55:59:08
But here's the thing.

00:55:59:08 - 00:56:00:07
Human beings are better

00:56:00:07 - 00:56:02:03
at getting the lay of the land.

00:56:02:03 - 00:56:04:16
You know, you can look inside a

00:56:04:16 - 00:56:05:14
part of the anatomy

00:56:05:14 - 00:56:07:17
and you can figure out heads or tails

00:56:07:17 - 00:56:11:09
as a human being, way better than any algorithm

00:56:11:09 - 00:56:12:11
is going to be able to do,

00:56:12:11 - 00:56:14:08
at least in the foreseeable future.

00:56:14:08 - 00:56:16:17
And so to me, that's why cooperative,

00:56:16:21 - 00:56:18:07
cooperative robotics

00:56:18:07 - 00:56:18:20
is such a it's

00:56:18:20 - 00:56:20:08
such a great opportunity

00:56:20:08 - 00:56:22:16
because you get to bring together

00:56:22:16 - 00:56:23:19
the best of both worlds.

00:56:23:19 - 00:56:26:21
Human beings are still the best motivated

00:56:26:21 - 00:56:28:11
decision makers

00:56:28:11 - 00:56:30:22
they can look at something and they can motivate.

00:56:30:22 - 00:56:32:17
You know, they're motivated to go,

00:56:32:17 - 00:56:33:18
OK, this is what I'm going to do.

00:56:33:18 - 00:56:35:00
OK, I've opened the patient up.

00:56:35:00 - 00:56:36:07
Oh, my God, they're a mess.

00:56:36:07 - 00:56:38:10
And actually make a game plan

00:56:38:10 - 00:56:39:12
and then apply it.

00:56:39:12 - 00:56:43:01
But the robot can actually make it to me

00:56:43:09 - 00:56:47:18
easier for them to do what they are trained to do.

00:56:47:23 - 00:56:49:21
And that's the best of both worlds.

00:56:49:21 - 00:56:50:15
I totally agree.

00:56:50:15 - 00:56:53:00
So last question for you.

00:56:53:00 - 00:56:54:07[7]
So you've been developing this robot

00:56:54:07 - 00:56:55:23
for six years.

00:56:55:23 - 00:56:58:23
You started as two guys in a garage, sounds like.

00:56:59:18 - 00:57:02:00
And here you are today, thriving.

00:57:02:00 - 00:57:03:15
So if you could go back

00:57:03:15 - 00:57:05:09
and do one thing differently

00:57:05:09 - 00:57:07:15
from a product development perspective,

00:57:08:15 - 00:57:11:13
what do you think that would be and why?

00:57:11:13 - 00:57:12:23
And again, our audience is,

00:57:12:23 - 00:57:16:06
entrepreneurs at global companies and,

00:57:16:15 - 00:57:18:20
folks like yourselves trying to get to market.

00:57:18:20 - 00:57:22:03
I wish I had more copies of our earlier prototypes.

00:57:23:03 - 00:57:25:01
I feel like even with the Mark 1

00:57:25:01 - 00:57:27:05
and the flying trashcan and all of that kind of stuff,

00:57:27:05 - 00:57:27:18
I feel like

00:57:27:18 - 00:57:29:06
we could have learned more

00:57:29:06 - 00:57:31:09
if we had more copies of that robot

00:57:31:09 - 00:57:32:12
that we could have.

00:57:32:12 - 00:57:34:17
I've got five different universities

00:57:34:17 - 00:57:36:15
that I work with on a regular basis

00:57:36:15 - 00:57:39:22
that are using our platform or building tools

00:57:40:06 - 00:57:41:12
or software modules

00:57:41:12 - 00:57:43:15
that are anticipating the use of our platform.

00:57:44:02 - 00:57:48:03
And if I could just send them a robot to have,

00:57:49:03 - 00:57:50:22
I think that would be such a

00:57:50:22 - 00:57:52:21
they would have been such a huge win.

00:57:52:21 - 00:57:55:20
And it's tough because especially,

00:57:55:20 - 00:57:57:04
in the money raising environment,

00:57:57:04 - 00:57:58:15
unless you're willing to go to some,

00:57:58:15 - 00:57:59:20
you know, $10 billion

00:57:59:20 - 00:58:01:07
fund and bring in a hundred million

00:58:01:07 - 00:58:03:22
and get deluded, you know, beyond belief,

00:58:04:21 - 00:58:06:23
it's not always easy to afford,

00:58:06:23 - 00:58:09:12
a half dozen prototypes of something

00:58:09:12 - 00:58:12:06
that you're not sure if it's really the final version.

00:58:12:06 - 00:58:12:20
Right.

00:58:13:19 - 00:58:16:16
But but if I had a magic wand

00:58:17:00 - 00:58:19:19
and I could make that decision

00:58:20:04 - 00:58:22:19
without consequences, consequences being dilution,

00:58:23:21 - 00:58:28:01
I would have absolutely have had more copies of each

00:58:28:01 - 00:58:30:11
of our rounds of prototypes than we were then

00:58:31:00 - 00:58:33:07
than what we actually ended up building.

00:58:33:07 - 00:58:34:10
I just think it's more valuable.

00:58:34:10 - 00:58:36:04
It's way more valuable.

00:58:36:04 - 00:58:36:10
You know,

00:58:36:10 - 00:58:38:03
it sounds like you wanted

00:58:38:03 - 00:58:40:10
why did you want more prototypes?

00:58:40:16 - 00:58:42:17
Just more user feedback early.

00:58:43:03 - 00:58:45:18
More user feedback.

00:58:46:18 - 00:58:47:23
You know, and then sometimes

00:58:47:23 - 00:58:50:03
maybe something screwy happens and you just like,

00:58:50:03 - 00:58:51:03
oh, man, if I could just, like,

00:58:51:03 - 00:58:53:01
take this robot half apart,

00:58:53:01 - 00:58:53:16
I could, like,

00:58:53:16 - 00:58:55:11
learn so much and I could figure out, oh,

00:58:55:11 - 00:58:57:12
why did you give that weird response? Right.

00:58:57:12 - 00:59:00:12
But if you've only got one or two of them,

00:59:00:12 - 00:59:02:00
you take the thing apart

00:59:02:00 - 00:59:03:17
so that you can play with it on the bench.

00:59:03:17 - 00:59:04:16
You suddenly have taken

00:59:04:16 - 00:59:06:08
that prototype out of commission

00:59:06:08 - 00:59:07:13
and now the software guys

00:59:07:13 - 00:59:09:11
maybe don't have a platform to develop it on

00:59:09:11 - 00:59:11:15
or you can't take it over to the university

00:59:11:15 - 00:59:13:10
or you can't take it to a cadaver lab.

00:59:13:10 - 00:59:15:01
You've got limited resources, right?

00:59:15:01 - 00:59:16:13
There's only there's only so

00:59:16:13 - 00:59:18:15
especially with something like a surgical robot,

00:59:18:15 - 00:59:20:14
you've only got so many resources

00:59:20:14 - 00:59:21:23
and yet you've got multiple.

00:59:21:23 - 00:59:22:23
Well, in our case,

00:59:22:23 - 00:59:24:12
we had surgeons from,

00:59:24:12 - 00:59:26:18
a half dozen disciplines going,

00:59:26:18 - 00:59:27:18
I've got a cadaver.

00:59:27:18 - 00:59:29:10
And if you can just bring the robot over,

00:59:31:05 - 00:59:32:15
we'll do a cadaver lab with you.

00:59:32:15 - 00:59:34:22
And it's like, oh, my God, yeah.

00:59:34:22 - 00:59:37:19
Just the opportunities create themselves.

00:59:37:19 - 00:59:39:23
If you've got multiple copies of the your prototype.

00:59:40:09 - 00:59:40:17
Yeah.

00:59:40:17 - 00:59:41:23
Did you consider, like,

00:59:41:23 - 00:59:44:07
making an analog a cheaper version?

00:59:44:07 - 00:59:44:23
I'm thinking

00:59:44:23 - 00:59:46:10
like I don't want to say

00:59:46:10 - 00:59:48:10
duct tape, but like, something that,

00:59:49:02 - 00:59:50:09
kind of mimicked it

00:59:50:09 - 00:59:52:06
enough to get you the user feedback

00:59:52:06 - 00:59:53:13
that you're looking for,

00:59:53:13 - 00:59:55:02
or is it just way too complicated

00:59:55:02 - 00:59:56:18
even consider that the other way to do it

00:59:56:18 - 00:59:58:14
cheaply is do a subsystem.

00:59:58:14 - 01:00:00:11
It would have been tough in our case

01:00:00:11 - 01:00:02:00
because the precision levels

01:00:02:00 - 01:00:04:07
were actually creating new opportunities.

01:00:04:07 - 01:00:05:18
There are minimally invasive

01:00:05:18 - 01:00:06:03
and narrow

01:00:06:03 - 01:00:07:09
corridor procedures

01:00:07:09 - 01:00:10:01
where just no other robot could touch that thing.

01:00:10:14 - 01:00:13:01
And the surgeons were like, well,

01:00:13:01 - 01:00:15:08
I think your technology can

01:00:15:08 - 01:00:17:16
but I need to try it myself.

01:00:17:16 - 01:00:22:21
And it was kind of one of those tricky things

01:00:22:21 - 01:00:25:21
where it's like what we're trying to evaluate

01:00:25:21 - 01:00:28:19
really required a fully working platform.

01:00:28:19 - 01:00:31:06
So we also did build simulators.

01:00:31:06 - 01:00:31:21
So I mean,

01:00:31:21 - 01:00:33:18
there are things that we

01:00:33:18 - 01:00:35:20
in fact do through software simulation.

01:00:35:20 - 01:00:38:03
We actually simulate a transsphenoidal approaches

01:00:38:03 - 01:00:39:17
and things like that completely

01:00:39:17 - 01:00:41:03
incidentally through Blender

01:00:43:06 - 01:00:43:23
we actually

01:00:43:23 - 01:00:47:20
built an animation model with rigging in Blender,

01:00:47:20 - 01:00:50:00
and we're actually able to validate

01:00:50:00 - 01:00:51:22
things like a transsphenoidal approach

01:00:51:22 - 01:00:53:18
and just make sure the geometry

01:00:53:18 - 01:00:57:03
was sufficient to get in and out and all of that.

01:00:57:03 - 01:00:57:20
So I mean, there

01:00:57:20 - 01:01:00:02
certainly were things that we did

01:01:00:02 - 01:01:02:13
do through through software simulation but

01:01:03:02 - 01:01:05:18
yeah, I looking back and if I had extra

01:01:05:18 - 01:01:07:20
versions of the Mark 1 and the Mark 2,

01:01:07:20 - 01:01:09:20
I would have been a happy camper. Yeah.

01:01:09:20 - 01:01:11:23
So there was obviously funding limitations

01:01:12:13 - 01:01:14:01
but I guess another question,

01:01:14:01 - 01:01:15:02
if you could go back.

01:01:15:02 - 01:01:15:06
Yeah.

01:01:15:06 - 01:01:15:11
I guess

01:01:15:11 - 01:01:16:14
what was the most challenging

01:01:16:14 - 01:01:18:12
part of what you're doing?

01:01:18:12 - 01:01:20:04
In some cases,

01:01:20:04 - 01:01:21:20
it was actually taking some of those things

01:01:21:20 - 01:01:24:07
that we were talking about earlier, those qualitative,

01:01:25:01 - 01:01:27:04
you know, kind of how does it feel

01:01:27:10 - 01:01:30:09
and actually turning that into numbers.

01:01:30:09 - 01:01:31:03
I mean, at some point

01:01:31:03 - 01:01:32:12
you're dealing with kinematics, right?

01:01:32:12 - 01:01:34:14
You've got to turn it into math somehow,

01:01:34:14 - 01:01:35:08
even though it

01:01:35:08 - 01:01:37:03
even though, like I said, it's got to feel right

01:01:37:03 - 01:01:39:06
or it doesn't matter what the math says.

01:01:39:06 - 01:01:40:19
But the flip side of that is

01:01:40:19 - 01:01:42:12
you've got to take what feels right

01:01:42:12 - 01:01:44:22
and you've got to be able to express that as math.

01:01:44:22 - 01:01:47:08
And that was tricky.

01:01:47:08 - 01:01:48:22
We've we've got some hardcore

01:01:48:22 - 01:01:52:18
math nerds here and we had some scary whiteboards with

01:01:54:15 - 01:01:55:10
all kinds of

01:01:55:10 - 01:01:57:07
crazy algorithms being worked out of there.

01:01:57:07 - 01:01:58:06
And,

01:01:58:06 - 01:02:01:13
that stuff can get really hairy at times.

01:02:02:00 - 01:02:06:14
And sometimes we would almost

01:02:07:06 - 01:02:09:06
there were a couple of times when we almost spent

01:02:09:06 - 01:02:11:10
nothing but

01:02:11:10 - 01:02:14:06
a full week just sitting there vetting math

01:02:16:00 - 01:02:17:18
because because ultimately that is

01:02:17:18 - 01:02:19:01
where your safety comes from.

01:02:19:01 - 01:02:21:19
I mean, if your algorithms bad

01:02:21:19 - 01:02:22:11
especially for these

01:02:22:11 - 01:02:25:14
some of these weird kinematic equations,

01:02:26:19 - 01:02:28:12
there could be a, you know,

01:02:28:12 - 01:02:31:18
a hidden motion that could actually cause an injury.

01:02:32:02 - 01:02:34:05
And so it's you got it.

01:02:34:05 - 01:02:36:05
That is rough to do it is it

01:02:36:05 - 01:02:38:20
it is a hair pulling situation at times.

01:02:39:17 - 01:02:42:14
So you recommend like creating kind of a baseline

01:02:42:15 - 01:02:46:18
algorithm and, create this sort of inventor analytics.

01:02:46:18 - 01:02:49:04
Yeah. Through analytics.

01:02:50:10 - 01:02:50:20
Yeah.

01:02:50:20 - 01:02:51:12
You got to you got

01:02:51:12 - 01:02:53:05
to you got to prove your math, prove your math.

01:02:53:05 - 01:02:56:07
Maybe the next episode sometime in the future.

01:02:56:07 - 01:02:57:23
So hey,

01:02:57:23 - 01:02:59:12
thank you so much for your time today.

01:02:59:12 - 01:03:00:20
And obviously,

01:03:00:20 - 01:03:01:19
best of luck, you know,

01:03:01:19 - 01:03:03:01
getting to market here

01:03:03:01 - 01:03:04:19
in the next couple of quarters or so

01:03:04:19 - 01:03:08:13
and yeah, go Baltimore.

01:03:08:13 - 01:03:10:00
So thanks, everybody.

Is this a real phrase? "Kick the fairs"
It doesn't look like it (according to google) but I think that's what he said.
Do you think he meant Mattel ?
Is this a real phrase?
I don't think so - I would just change it to "I'll give you another example"
Background noise here. Sounds like Andy is repeating himself
Lots of backend noise here