blainehansen: "Governance orgies" happen when the governance mechanisms aren't well-designed ha. If they are well-designed then governance is good!
jbk: opsware maybe? or tivoli?
uptill3: hp openview was one as well
sevanj: "they've got us working for trinkets"
sevanj: this was mentioned on the bugzilla anouncement regarding funded staff being pulled from working on project in the last 3 years.
blainehansen: All open source problems are secretly public goods problems haha
carpetbomberz.com: Hashicorp DID do a "thing"
blacksmithforlife: Just like taxes fund roads, we should have a internet usage tax that then funds these open source projects that everyone finds value in. The person taxed should get to decide which open source project gets the money
kaliszad: The problem is, you can help other people, but first you have to sustain yourself. 🙂
aarondgoldman: Too boring to be evil
rolipo.li: too busy to be evil?
aarondgoldman: Angular never got budget even when Inbox used it and had millions of users
blainehansen: Most open source projects are probably not best led/governed by a for-profit company ha
aarondgoldman: HP had a huge repair service business when their hardware got much more reliable it almost killed the company
geekgonecrazy: Never actually considered using CNCF membership as a qualification for using a tool
ahl0003: it's the nintendo seal of quality!
geekgonecrazy: It’s an interesting thought now that I’ve heard it 🙈 especially for any sort of core utility like this
saone: On the topic of patterns that seem to be working, Docker Desktop's license requiring subscriptions for larger organizations for use of their product and focusing on providing a really good developer experience seems to be a really good spot for them to be
goodjanet: The term freeloading comes up only when there's a "problem" (usually fiscal in a company/group), the rest of the time the exact same actions are fine or often encouraged
mrdanack: I disagree, there are freeloaders. Multi-billion companies like IBM and Oracle have benefited from the PHP project for multiple decades and really haven't contributed even a modest amount back.
geekgonecrazy: Anytime hitting CLA I always use that as clue to take hesitation and think about contributing. 🙈
blainehansen: Sometimes a community of passionate contributors is more a burden than a gift. Every project is different, not every project can be supported by many well-paid engineers at vc-funded incentive-aligned companies. I don't think the BUSL is smart or good, but there's a funding/support problem here that legitimately needs to be solved, and the existing open source social contract hasn't solved it. https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2022/burden-open-source-maintainer
blacksmithforlife: Disclaimer: I'm a federal employee who tried to get more software open source while I was working at various agencies. For the most part it was soundly ignored and the agencies just claimed it was too hard and they didn't have enough funding to do it, which in my opinion is just false
blacksmithforlife: But, if you want it, just do a FOIA, then they have to give it to you
saone: There's a great deal of fear at my company that software being open sourced must be carefully vetted to avoid potential embarassment so the hurdles to open source anything are very high
girgias: The French government has released code which was pure garbage, and I don't think one can do worse than the APB code
geekgonecrazy: That sucks. 😬I can totally see individual developers being afraid. I’ve faced that with my team. Weird to think org would be especially if trusting engineers
northrup: Adam to your point though - I don't see how that's any different than other open source projects that aren't corporate backed. No open source projected is obligated to honor your issue to drive a project in a direction, or accept your PR to add a feature or function...
geekgonecrazy: Curious at what scale you think devrel is needed vs the engineers in company directly involved
geekgonecrazy: I’ve often wondered if doesn’t create unnecessary barrier between engineers and community. Especially at certain size
quasarken: Dev Rel seems a lot like community solutions engineering
geekgonecrazy: I’ve personally seen some companies use devrel as sole tie to open source and “community” in place of more of company getting involved
rolipo.li: devrel as a service. now it's a consulting firm?
northrup: When I worked at GitLab in the early days, some of my most favorite experiences were going to conferences and hanging out in the GitLab booth to answer questions and talk with / help users. SOO much great feedback, clear "oh wow!" edge cases brought forward, and amazing feedback of "yeah, you made this feature, but that wasn't what we needed"
sevanj: did you see the wipeout rewrites that have been coming out in recent weeks
rolipo.li: the oxide github is great
goodjanet: i wish more old games were open sourced
blacksmithforlife: And their tool chains. When I worked at the library of Congress, it was near impossible to build some of these games because there was no documentation on what tools they used and how to build the software
saone: there have been a few (Freespace, Warzone 2100, Red Alert...) but it definitely isn't widespread, and there are ungodly licensing issues surrounding that from what I understand
geekgonecrazy: 💯 it’s as much if not more about the people than the software
goodjanet: people make things not corporations!
kelseyhightower: Thanks for listening and hanging out with us.
If we got something wrong or missed something, please file a PR! Our next show will likely be on Monday at 5p Pacific Time on our Discord server; stay tuned to our Mastodon feeds for details, or subscribe to this calendar. We'd love to have you join us, as we always love to hear from new speakers!