The Digital Commerce Daily

American Express launches an AI agent payment framework, Target admits brands resist its new retail media metric, and The Independent's social commerce overtakes SEO.

Show Notes

American Express just built the trust layer agentic commerce needs. Meanwhile, Target's retail media push is hitting a measurement credibility wall — and The Independent's revenue flip signals where product discovery is heading.

In this episode:

  • The Independent CEO Christian Broughton confirmed that in September 2026, social commerce revenue overtook SEO-driven affiliate revenue for the first time — a concrete inflection point in how digital publishers monetise product content.
  • A senior Target executive publicly acknowledged that most brand partners are not yet on board with the retailer's new ad metric designed to connect spend directly to sales outcomes, exposing a trust gap at the heart of retail media.
  • American Express published a formal framework enabling card issuers to verify and authenticate purchases initiated by AI shopping agents on behalf of consumers, addressing the core authorisation problem blocking mainstream agentic commerce.

The Digital Commerce Daily is a concise briefing for ecommerce, retail media and digital commerce professionals, hosted by Marco & Klara. New episode every day.

Enjoying the show? A quick rating or review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify helps other marketers find us.

Also from Marco & Klara: The FMCG Marketing Daily · The Health Marketing Daily

What is The Digital Commerce Daily?

Your 8-minute briefing on the platforms, players, and profits driving digital commerce today. Hosted by Marco and Klara.

Marco: Morning — three stories today that are all quietly connected, even if they don't look it at first.

Klara: We've got a big moment for publisher revenue, a measurement battle brewing inside retail media, and something that could fundamentally change how AI shopping actually works.

Marco: Discovery, ad spend, and the future of buying — all in one show.

Klara: Let's go.

Marco: For the first time ever, social media has overtaken Google search as the bigger source of commerce revenue at The Independent.

Klara: So let's set the scene. The Independent is one of the UK's biggest digital news publishers. Like a lot of media brands, it makes money partly through affiliate links — that means when a reader clicks a product recommendation and buys something, the publisher earns a cut. For years, the main way readers found those product pages was through Google search.

Marco: And that model worked well — until now. In September 2026, The Independent's CEO Christian Broughton confirmed that social commerce revenue had overtaken search-driven commerce revenue for the first time. That's not a forecast or a trend piece. That's a specific, dated moment where the numbers actually flipped.

Klara: And I think the reason this matters beyond publishing is that The Independent's audience is essentially a mirror of how everyday consumers find and buy things. If social is now the bigger driver for them, it's a strong signal that the same shift is happening for brands too.

Marco: Exactly what I was going to say. If you're an ecommerce brand that built your whole discovery model on ranking well in Google, this should make you uncomfortable. Not panicked — but uncomfortable. Search isn't dead, but it is no longer the only game in town.

Klara: Though I'd add a small note of caution. A publisher's audience and a brand's customer base aren't always the same thing. The Independent skews quite content-led. Some product categories — white goods, B2B, high-consideration purchases — may still lean heavily on search.

Marco: Fair, but the direction of travel is clear. The question for any ecommerce team is straightforward: do your social commerce investments actually match where your customers are finding products right now?

Klara: Because if the answer is no, you're already behind.

Marco: Our next story is coming right up.

Marco: Target — the big US retailer — is pushing a new way to measure whether ads actually drive sales. And its own exec has admitted most brands don't want to use it.

Klara: To understand why that's significant, you need to know what retail media actually is. When a brand pays a retailer — say Tesco or Zalando — to show ads inside their website or app, that's retail media. It's one of the fastest-growing parts of digital advertising right now, because retailers can use their shopping data to target people who are genuinely likely to buy.

Marco: The promise has always been: we can show you exactly how your ad spend turns into sales. But the reality is messier. Target is now trying to formalise that promise with a new metric — basically a formula for connecting ad spend to actual revenue outcomes. Sounds good in theory. Except a senior Target exec has publicly said most of their brand partners aren't on board yet.

Klara: And that admission is telling. Because if you're selling advertisers on the idea that your measurement is better than Google or Meta, and your own clients don't trust the numbers yet, that's a credibility problem. Not a small one.

Marco: This is where I think the stakes go beyond Target. Every major retail media network — including those run by European retailers — is essentially asking brands to relearn how to measure advertising. That's a big ask when the old metrics, however imperfect, are at least familiar.

Klara: Though I'd say there's a charitable read here too. The fact that Target is having this conversation publicly suggests the industry is at least trying to move in the right direction. The problem isn't that the metric exists — it's that trust takes time to build.

Marco: And budgets don't wait for trust to catch up. Our final story is next.

Marco: American Express has just published a framework for verifying purchases made by AI shopping agents — and it's one of the more quietly significant infrastructure moves we've seen in commerce this year.

Klara: So let's back up for a second. AI shopping agents are software that can browse, choose, and buy products on your behalf — you set a goal, and the agent handles the transaction. The idea has been generating enormous excitement. But almost nobody has addressed the obvious problem sitting underneath it: how does a payment network know the purchase was actually authorised by a real human, and not just an autonomous piece of software doing something the customer never intended?

Marco: That's precisely what Amex is tackling. They've released a formal framework that lets card issuers verify and authenticate purchases initiated by AI agents on behalf of consumers. So if your AI agent buys something, the payment system can now confirm — through this framework — that you genuinely approved it. It's not a product you download. It's infrastructure. A set of rules and standards that the rest of the payments world could build on top of.

Klara: And I think the liability question is the really interesting thread here. If an AI agent buys the wrong product, or gets hijacked by a bad actor, who is responsible? The consumer? The brand? The agent platform? Amex is essentially positioning itself to answer that question before it becomes a crisis.

Marco: Which is smart timing. The brands and ecommerce platforms that integrate with verified agent frameworks early will have a real advantage when consumers start routinely delegating purchasing decisions to AI. That moment isn't fully here yet — but it's closer than most people think.

Klara: My slight hesitation is that one framework from one payment company doesn't automatically become the standard. This only matters if Visa, Mastercard, and European payment networks follow suit. Otherwise it's a very well-designed island.

Marco: A fair challenge. But someone had to go first — and whoever sets the template tends to shape what comes after.

Marco: The single biggest idea from today — the infrastructure for how people find, trust, and buy things online is being rebuilt underneath us, all at once.

Klara: So ask yourself: if discovery, measurement, and payment are all shifting, which one of those three is your weakest link right now?