Your Art Is A Spell

What happens when a society decides an education is only worth funding if it yields an immediate corporate paycheck?

In this episode, we unpack the dangerous federal student loan policy direction tying student loan access to graduate earning thresholds, putting fields like fine art, music, therapy, social work, counseling, and early childhood education directly in the crosshairs. This isn’t just an abstract economic debate about debt; it is a structural move that determines who gets to tell stories, be a part of creative culture, who can afford to care for others, and who gets to dream beyond basic survival.

We explore the reality behind these artistic education loan restrictions, why underpaid labor does not equal low-value work, how gatekeeping artistic expression degrees threatens marginalized voices, making art as luxury, and what we can do to build interdependence, mutual support, care systems, and cultural resistance.

What We Cover
  • The policy shift: Tying federal student student loan policy aid to post-grad salary thresholds
  • Why equating market price with human value deepens societal inequality
  • How cutting aid for creative and care fields gentrifies culture and silences working-class voices
  • Moving from survival mode into collective imagination
  • Practical ways to support creative culture, cultural workers, fight systemic gatekeeping, and build community alternatives
  • If this conversation resonated with you, share it with an artist, therapist, teacher, or friend who needs to hear it.
Chapters

00:00 Introduction: The impact of education policies on society
02:01 The importance of culture, art, and care work
03:58 The implications of restricting access to creative fields
06:02 The cultural role of art, music, and storytelling
07:54 The economic undervaluation of care and creative labor
10:00 The importance of advocacy and policy change
11:52 Building community support and interdependence
13:57 Dreaming of a more inclusive and creative future
16:01 Conclusion: Valuing and supporting cultural and care work


Community & Links
Support the show on Patreon: patreon.com/yourartisaspell

💌 Join the Mutant Magic newsletter and membership space: 
https://mutant-magic.com

🌐 Follow me on Instagram
https://www.instagram.com/edgarfabianfrias/

To Watch / Listen to More Episodes from Your Art Is A Spell
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLEVN8TPFy9dYKoNr4LjNV9yDajN-ILKNR&si=1WF6GkfQh2pGfrzl

To send me a voice note
https://www.speakpipe.com/YouArtIsASpell

To learn more about me and my art
www.yourartisaspell.com 

To learn about my private practice Therapy With Edgar 
www.therapywithedgar.com

🕊️ Follow Me on BlueSky
https://bsky.app/profile/edgarfabianfrias.org

What is Your Art Is A Spell?

Welcome to Your Art Is A Spell, the podcast that ignites inspiring and transformative conversations about art as a magical practice. I'm your host, Edgar Fabián Frías—a multi-passionate artist, witch, therapist, and proud mutant shape-shifter. My art spells have reached audiences through social media, billboards, and skyscrapers and have even been placed on the surface of the moon! Join us as we explore how reclaiming your unique artistic voice and embracing bold creativity can transform your life and the world around you. Subscribe to the podcast and sign up for our newsletter at www.yourartisaspell.com to stay connected!

What happens when the government decides that 
an education is only worth supporting if it  

makes enough money? Not whether it helps people. 
Not whether it brings beauty into the world. Not  

whether it allows someone to help a child learn. 
Support a survivor. Make music that gets someone  

through grief. Create images that expand what 
people believe is possible. or offer care that  

makes life liveable. Just, does it make enough 
money? There's a new federal policy direction  

that ties access to student loans more closely 
to whether graduates of a program earn above a  

certain threshold. And the programs that are 
being discussed as vulnerable include fields  

like cosmetology, massage therapy, culinary arts, 
social work, mental health counseling, fine art,  

music, graphic design, English, religious 
studies, early childhood education, medical  

and dental assisting. I just want to make it clear 
that this is not a ban on these fields. People can  

still study them. But when federal loans become 
less accessible, education becomes something that  

only people with money, family support, credit or 
private loans can realistically pursue. And that  

is the point I want to talk about today because 
this is not only a conversation about student  

loans. It's a conversation about who gets to 
create culture, who gets to care for other people,  

who gets to develop a voice, who gets to dream 
beyond survival. And yes, I am angry. I think  

anger is an appropriate response when people in 
power tell us once again that the things which  

make life meaningful are somehow less valuable 
than whatever generates the fastest and highest  

paycheck. And I also want to be grounded as I 
speak about this. I want to talk about what is  

happening, why it matters, what it could mean for 
our collective futures and what we can do instead  

of accepting this vision of the world being 
offered by them. Okay, first let's talk about the  

reality of what's being discussed. argument behind 
this kind of policy is that students should not be  

encouraged to take on debt for programs that do 
not lead to higher earnings. And on the surface,  

people might hear this and think, well, of course, 
we should not trap students in debt. That is a  

real problem. Student debt is real. Predatory 
schools are real. Programs that make huge  

promises and leave people financially stranded 
should absolutely be held accountable. But here's  

where we need to slow down. There is a massive 
difference between protecting students from  

exploitation and deciding that a field has little 
value because its workers are not paid enough.  

Those are not the same thing. If graduates of a 
field are struggling financially, we should ask  

why is that work underpaid? Who benefits from that 
underpayment? What would it look like to improve  

wages, labor protections, public funding, and 
access to those careers? Instead, this approach  

risks sending a very different message. If society 
has failed to pay you properly for your work, then  

you should lose access to the education that would 
allow you to do that work. That is backwards. The  

part that feels the most chilling for me is what 
this does to culture. Cuz art, music, writing,  

design, performance, healing work, early childhood 
education, and community care are not extras.  

They are not frivolous little decorations placed 
on top of a real society. They are part of how  

society knows itself. Culture is how we tell the 
truth about what has happened to us. It is how  

we preserve memory. It is how people recognize 
themselves. It is how a child sees a life they  

did not know was possible. It is how a person 
survives isolation. It is how communities mourn,  

celebrate, organize and resist. And when access 
to cultural education becomes more restricted,  

culture does not disappear. It becomes more 
exclusive. It becomes more likely that the  

people who can afford to make art, study music, 
take creative risks, pursue therapy training,  

or enter care work are people who already have a 
financial safety net. So then we have to ask whose  

stories will get told? What aesthetics will define 
what is beautiful? Whose pain will be considered  

worthy of being documented? Whose imagination gets 
preserved, funded, exhibited, published, recorded  

or taught because we already know the answer 
to this. Historically, museums, universities,  

publishers, musical institutions, and cultural 
gatekeepers have never been neutral. Women, queer,  

and trans people, disabled people, working class 
people, immigrants, and people from the global  

majority have had to fight for the right to be 
seen, collected, funded, and taken seriously.  

There has been some progress, very imperfect 
progress, uneven progress, but real progress.  

And policies that make creative and care centered 
education harder to access genuinely threaten that  

progress. They can make it harder for people 
without wealth to become artists, therapists,  

educators, designers, writers, and cultural 
workers who shape our shared reality. There is  

another layer here that feels deeply important. 
When people are kept in survival mode, they do  

not have the same room to dream. That is not a 
personal failure. That is not because someone is  

being lazy or uncreative. Survival takes so much 
energy. Financial precarity takes so much energy.  

Constantly wondering whether you can pay your 
rent, afford food, see a doctor, take time off,  

or make one mistake without losing everything 
takes a lot of energy. And dreaming also takes  

energy. To make art, you need some degree of 
time, space, safety, and permission to listen  

to yourself. To enter into therapy, whether as a 
client or someone training to become a therapist,  

you need space to believe that transformation is 
possible. To make music, write, design, cook, care  

for children, counsel people, make work that is 
emotionally honest. You need access to a life that  

is more than just extraction. That is why I reject 
that idea that these are low value fields. These  

are fields that help us recognize that we are more 
than labor units. These fields remind us that we  

have interior lives, bodies, desires, memories, 
spiritual and emotional needs, grief, pleasure,  

imagination. Art can help someone imagine a future 
that they've never seen represented. Therapy can  

help someone recognize that the conditions they 
grew up with are not the only conditions possible.  

Social work can help people find concrete support, 
safety, housing, benefits, and pathways out of  

violence or crisis. These are real material 
interventions and they are also interventions  

into consciousness. All of that matters so much. 
We're often taught to talk about art as if it's  

separate from politics, separate from economics, 
separate from real life. But culture changes what  

people can see. And what people can see they can 
name. And what people can name they can organize  

around. Before a society changes laws, it often 
has to change its imagination. People have to be  

able to picture a different way of living, 
a different family structure, a different  

relationship to gender, a different relationship 
to disability, race, work, wealth, care,  

the environment, pleasure, or community. That is 
what art does. That is what music does. That is  

what storytelling does. That is what healing does. 
It shifts the boundaries of the imaginable. So  

when we talk about these programs being pushed 
farther out of reach, we're not just talking  

about career training. We're talking about the 
infrastructure that helps people imagine and build  

different lives. And I want to be careful here. 
I'm not saying that every artist is automatically  

a revolutionary or that art alone can solve 
material problems. It cannot. We need housing.  

We need health care. We need wages. We need labor 
protections. We need material redistribution.  

But art and culture are not separate from those 
struggles. They help us feel why those struggles  

matter. They help us refuse narratives that say 
suffering is normal. Exploitation is inevitable  

and there's no alternative. And one of the reasons 
why I'm so angry about this is because for me,  

therapy changed my life. It changed 
what I believed was possible for myself.  

It changed how I understood my own history, my 
own internal experience. It helped me recognize  

patterns I had been living inside of without 
even being able to name them. And art has done  

the same. Art has helped me encounter realities 
beyond the one I was handed. It has helped me find  

language for things I did not know how to say. It 
has connected me to people across time, geography,  

identity, and experience. It has helped me make 
meaning when meaning did not arrive automatically,  

organically, cleanly, when it was messy. Not only 
that, but I would not have been able to study and  

go to school if it weren't for federal funding. 
I come from a background of people who did not go  

to school. I'm not someone who was born into that 
type of privilege. I needed financial support to  

even start my career as an undergraduate, 
let alone pursue two master's degrees,  

one in therapy and one in art. I would not have 
been able to do that without federal funding or  

support. That would have been impossible for me to 
do. So when I hear that the fields of art, music,  

therapy, counseling, social work, and care are 
treated as if they're not economically worthwhile,  

I do not hear an abstract policy conversation. 
I hear a message that says, "The things that  

helped you become more alive are optional. 
The things that help people heal are optional.  

The things that help people feel less alone are 
optional. And I reject that. We must refuse the  

idea that market price is the same thing as 
human value. A therapist may be underpaid  

because insurance systems are broken because care 
labor is feminized and historically undervalued  

because access to mental health care is unequal. 
An artist may be underpaid because creative labor  

is routinely extracted for exposure, prestige, 
or the promise of future opportunity. A social  

worker may be underpaid despite doing work 
that literally keep people housed, safe, alive,  

and connected to resources. An early childhood 
educator may be underpaid despite helping shape  

the foundation of a child's entire life. All 
of these low wages are not proof that the labor  

is unimportant. They are proof that our current 
economic system is failing to honor the labor that  

sustains people and communities. And if the answer 
to that failure is to make it harder for low income  

people to enter into these fields, then we are not 
solving anything. We are deepening the inequality.  

So what do we do? First, we tell the truth about 
the value of our work. Artists, therapists,  

educators, healers, designers, musicians, and 
care workers, what you do matters. Your work is  

not a cute hobby. It's not an indulgence. it 
is not automatically less valuable because a  

broken system has failed to compensate it fairly. 
Second, we need to advocate for policies that  

expand rather than restrict access. We need public 
investment in education. We need better wages for  

care workers and cultural workers. We need debt 
relief. We need labor protections. We need funding  

structures that do not force people to choose 
between serving their communities or being able to  

survive. Third, we need to build interdependence 
while we fight for structural change.  

That can mean mutual aid, skill exchanges, sliding 
scale offerings where sustainable impossible,  

shared studios, community resource lists, 
referring clients and collaborators to one  

another, supporting independent artists 
and practitioners directly when we can,  

choosing not to demand free labor from people 
whose work we value. And finally, we have to  

keep dreaming. Not in a vague way, not as denial, 
dreaming as a practice of refusing the limited  

future that we are being sold. They may imagine 
a future where culture belongs to the wealthy,  

care belongs to the wealthy, therapy belongs to 
the wealthy, and only certain people can afford  

to make meaning. But that is not the only future 
available to us. Our imaginations are far more  

expansive than that. Our communities are so much 
more creative than that. And the work is to make  

those futures into a material reality. So as 
a way to close, I want to leave you with this.  

The question is not whether art, therapy, care, 
music, beauty, joy, and collective imagination  

have value. The question is whether we are willing 
to build a society that recognizes and supports  

that value. Because a world where only wealthy 
people can afford to become artists, therapists,  

educators, musicians, and cultural workers is 
not a neutral world. It is a smaller world,  

a more controlled world, a world with fewer 
voices, fewer possibilities and fewer ways for  

people to recognize their own power. So, let's 
stay angry, but let's make that anger useful.  

Let's defend these fields. Let's pay people. Let's 
support each other. Let's refuse scarcity as our  

only imagination. and let's keep making the 
work that reminds people that another world is  

possible. And with that, I want to remind you that 
your art is a spell and it will change your life  

and the world around us. If you have received any 
meaning, support, care from this message, I urge  

you to share it with a friend. I also invite you 
to go over to our Patreon at patreon.com/yourartisaspell

there, You can become a free or paid 
member for only $5 a month. This helps me continue  

to make this podcast and I want to thank the 
paid and free members over on Patreon. Last,  

if you would like to get on my newsletter, I 
want to invite you to go to mutant-magagic.com

and sign up for my free newsletter. Remember, 
we are much more powerful than you could ever  

imagine. There is a reason why they are trying to 
pass laws like this and make changes like these.  

We cannot forget our power and 
the magic that exists between us.