Channel Waves by StructuredWeb

Today's CPO (Chief Partner Officer)

In this episode of ChannelWaves, Steven Kellam and Asher Mathew, the CEO of Partnership Leaders, explore the evolving landscape of partnerships within the channel. The discussion addresses the significance of the Chief Partner Officer (CPO) role and the necessity of unifying diverse partnership functions across companies. Asher emphasizes the need for cohesion in channel and alliance structures, pointing out the pivotal role of a CPO in navigating this complex landscape across customer journeys. Partnership Leaders aims to support partner teams by offering essential resources, events, and reports to equip them for the evolving demands within the channel landscape.

What is Channel Waves by StructuredWeb?

A podcast for Channel Marketers, Channel Waves is a place where channel leaders share success strategies, best practices and emerging trends, brought to you by StructuredWeb.

Welcome to ChannelWaves, the podcast where channel

leaders share success strategies, best practices, and emerging

trends brought to you by StructuredWeb.

Here's your host, Stephen Kellam.

Welcome, everybody, to another

episode of ChannelWaves.

I'm your host, Stephen Kellam.

Very excited today to be talking partnerships, Partnership

Leaders with Asher Mathew, who is the co-

founder and CEO of Partnership Leaders.

Welcome, Asher. Thank you so much.

Thanks for having me.

No, it's great.

Hey, look, congratulations for becoming

a partnership leaders member finally.

This is love.

Yes.

And thank you for finally showing me

the value and providing me value Partnership

Leaders so that I could join.

It's interesting, right?

I was talking to somebody else this week, right?

And in our history, we started working

with a company called Crossbeam, which I

think everybody should know, right?

And we did so much stuff with them

because Crossbeam needed us and we needed them.

And there was a very symbiotic relationship.

People for the longest time thought

we were the Crossbeams Community, right?

And then since then, Crossbeams have grown

up and they have much larger ambitions.

They have to go create a much larger company, right?

So they're focusing on partnerships, personas, but

also other go to market personas, right?

And then people like, I was on the

phone with somebody else and they were like,

hey, how's things at Crossbeam?

I'm like, what do you mean?

They're like, well, aren't you their community?

And I'm like, okay, let me explain to you what we do.

And not that there's anything wrong with that,

but I'm just like, it's so hard to

share information and just make it stick.

But the reason I share that is because

the primary value when we started was just

to help people understand how account mapping actually

works and why account mapping is great.

And then now where we are is we have 978 companies

on the network, if you want to call it that. Right?

And then 34% of them are SMBs, 33% of them are

mid market, and now 33% of them are like large enterprise.

Not to interrupt you, but I am going to interrupt you.

Yeah, that's okay for me, people

like me, that is the value.

This is the reason we're talking, I think. Fascinating.

We're going to talk about the

acceleration of all of this, right?

And that 33% of the enterprise and

the difference two years really makes. Yeah.

Thank you to you.

Thank you to, let's say, Heather Margolis.

And thank you to a few other people that

actually gave me this feedback in January, because I

clearly remember the feedback was, hey, look like Partnership

Leaders is supporting a lot of the emerging tech,

but what about the tech that needs transformation?

Because if partnerships is the future, then there's a lot

of other people that need to hear this message, too.

Right.

And it didn't quite click back then.

But then right from that, we started exploring what

would it take to serve the large enterprise. Right.

Like, we don't have a product for them, and then

we also don't want to just show up and say,

me, me, but rather actually find value for them.

And I feel like today we have that. Right.

And so I can go into detail of that.

But thank you for inspiring us.

And you were also there at Catalyst in Miami last year.

I've been there since the beginning. Exactly.

You've literally seen the whole journey.

So thank you for that. Yeah.

And look, I'm no visionary, that for sure, but I

recognize a good thing when I see it coming.

And I also recognize how quickly I

thought this was going to Intertwine.

And we met two years ago in Miami.

I thought a CPO was a Chief Product Officer. Right.

Okay, I'm dating myself.

I'm not really dating myself.

Four years ago, if you said CPO, what's a CPO? Yeah.

You would have said Chief Product Officer.

It's a Chief Product Officer. Right.

I still have a hard time writing it.

And, you know, what is the Chief Partnerships Officer?

So maybe here's what I really.

The question I want to ask is this is

incredibly disruptive and for the channel, is this an

opportunity or is this something to angst over?

But don't answer that, because I think yet, because

what I think we should go is a little

bit of Partnership Leaders, how it's evolved, and what

is a Chief Partnership Officer, and how does that

fit into this world where we're all seeking clarity?

And you got channel on one side,

you got ecosystems, you got alliances.

And they are just getting so intertwined, and people

are trying to figure out what's the difference?

What's the similarity?

I think most importantly, they're trying

to figure out where's the synergy?

What do I need to do to be a part of it? Yeah, totally.

So Partnership Leaders exists to elevate

partner teams around the world, and

we have four distinct offerings today.

We have a community which can be thought

of as a membership association or a network.

And we were born out of COVID So we built

virtual engagement first, and then we built in person experiences.

So that's one piece.

The second piece is market insights.

We have seven or eight reports done on topics like

the state of partner ops, the state of partner led

growth, which is focused on go to market teams.

We have the state of partner

experience, the state of co-sale.

How do you work with hyperscalers?

So that's another part of our group, right?

And then the third piece is experiences.

We have meetups that are running around the world.

We have our conference, Catalyst, which

had 700 people attend this year.

And then the last piece is we have education, right?

So we have self-serve education,

and we have cohort based education.

And these four pieces, in our humble

opinion, bring together tools that partner teams

can use to elevate themselves.

And a lot of partner people are really builders.

And so they want to build.

They want to go build partner

programs, they want to build companies.

So we created a company

that literally just supports them.

So if there was like, a platform for success

for partner teams, that's how we're positioning it, and

we'll add more features to support them.

So that's how we've been able to

take the most important things that create

value for members and put them together.

Okay, maybe you can start with what

is a CPO in this, right?

And remember, 95% of the audience that I reach

on a daily basis or that I'm connected with

define the channel as selling through versus selling with.

Once again, it's all starting to comingle.

But I think that's our one thing to emphasize

is Partnership Leaders is not creating any movement, right.

Like we are creating a platform

to support other people's movement, right?

So everything that's happening in the marketplace,

we are reading it, we have 1500

members in 42 different countries.

So we're grabbing information all the time, and

we're picking the things that logically make sense,

and then we're amplifying that, right?

So what we learned in the last two years,

specifically, actually, it started at Catalyst last year, right.

Is that partnerships impact across the

customer journey became important to realize.

And so whether it is the presales process, where I

believe most of the channel exists, or it's the post

sales process, which is where services and alliances exist, or

I know there are some definitions of channel which include

all of that, too, that's also okay, right?

But this new thing that came up, which was

technology integrations, which actually focused on the workflow of

users, that part of partnerships was even more underserved

than all the other parts of partnerships, which would

be channels and alliances, right?

And so we found ourselves as a home for them first.

And then at Catalyst, the whole conversation became

about serving the entire customer journey, and it

almost became, like a Chief Customer Officer role

for partnerships, because the customer success team also

serves the entire customer journey.

And in some companies, the CRO does that.

And so what we realized over the last year or

so is that there are three or four different types

of partnerships, and then there is now a world where

they all have to work together, whether they're selling together,

marketing together, serving together, or building together.

Right.

But what's missing is a leader

who can unify all of them.

And the reason why we believe that is

because on the direct business side, there is

a CRO who's responsible for unifying SMB, mid

market and enterprise sales. For us in partnerships,

I would say whether you're in the pre-sales process,

which is where a lot of channel companies exist, or

you're in the post-sales process, where the alliances exist,

or you're helping with the workflow, which is where technology

integrations exist, or you're building large strategic deals to grow

companies and provide leverage, there has to be talent that

exists out in the marketplace that is an expert in

all of them.

And so the stats are there are 152,000 CMOs, there

are 37,000 CROs, about 27,000 Chief Sales Officers, 10,000 Chief

Customer Officers, and I think less than 2000,

let's call it alliances, channels, or partnership

leaders that are senior at that level.

Well, okay, you say there's 2000.

How many of them were there four years ago?

I don't know.

I think no.

We were so young.

So this is a hobby, right?

This is a hobby that became something.

And then along the way, folks that are super

experienced, like yourself and Heather and Jay and a

number of people like Alan and stuff, you've all

helped us realize the different things that are important.

And so we have built this thing with you.

All right, again, we didn't build

this thing all by ourselves.

Actually, almost everything in Partnership Leaders is

built by somebody in our community.

And so it's a very

member driven, member built organization.

And now we're at a point where we are

creating some structure so we can elevate all of

those members to the goals that they want.

Look, I think it's a great opportunity when

you're talking to someone, and you and I

both, we've both been in sales, both been

in marketing, I've been a channel chief.

I've run alliances.

And I think the evolution was that

it was all going to come together.

There was a moment in my brain when it just went click.

Okay.

Does it really matter whether you're selling

with or whether you're selling through.

How does that sale work with the ultimate buyer? Right.

And how do we maximize and

make that as effective as possible?

That selling motion marketing, and actually

even the marketing motion too.

Because let me tell you, I was involved in alliances.

I was watching partnerships like seven or

eight years ago when you would have

two massive Fortune 100 companies selling together.

You could name maybe three of them

coming together, doing an offering, and the

worst thing they actually did was market.

And then at the end, on fulfillment and operations

side, we're not even talking about the challenges you

had in the sales side, but they couldn't market

their way out of a box with a message. Right.

So, I mean, it's been going on forever.

It just wasn't done very well. Yeah.

I've now been through four different startups and two

of them were acquired and one went public.

So I've kind of seen a lot of

the different iterations of a go to market. Right.

And so I feel like companies have been working on

co-selling and co-marketing with each other for a

while, but it still landed in this art zone, it

never landed in this science, and maybe it does in

larger organizations, but the vast majority of the SMB and mid

market just looked at it as this thought experiment and

never really put any structure around it.

And that's why you don't have a lot

of senior partner people in mid market companies.

Even companies that like a billion dollars

in revenue don't have Chief Partner Officers

or somebody that's aligning all of the

different partnering functions together.

And by the way, developer audiences

are also a channel of sorts.

Like you and I were talking when we met

for dinner a few weeks ago, where you have

a large company that has a consultants network, but

they also have an app store, and there's a

big opportunity to bring those two together.

But how many leaders exist that can

actually do that type of work?

I don't know.

I actually think there are a fair amount.

Look, I think you could have asked the

partners a long time ago in the channel

through sell partners how it would work.

And it was funny.

We were talking about this when I was

at 360ecosystems last week, and Chris was

there and we were talking about that.

This partnerships has been going

on forever at both levels.

At both the vendor side, they didn't very, like I said,

didn't do a great job on marketing and probably at the

end, but at the partner side, I was an MSP a

while ago, I partnered in 30% of my deals already.

This was ten years ago.

So it's been going on forever.

And we could have probably just asked the partners

in the channel, okay, what do we see?

Where's this thing going?

And I think both from the software side that you're

talking about and development and surely from, we have average

of four vendors in a deal or more. Right.

And then I'm working with two

other partners on my delivery.

By the way, the buyer was looking

at this over ten years ago.

Yeah, I know I'm on this podcast, so

I should be your interview, but I like

to do podcasts where it's a discussion, really.

Why hasn't there been a leader that

unifies all partnering functions in the past?

What does your data point say

or what's your experience say?

This is just my take, right.

And it's a discussion. We'll do this.

And maybe just a couple of points because nobody

wants to listen to a 45 minutes podcast.

We can literally take two on it.

Here's my take on it.

I think a couple of things.

I think the channel is very complex and I

think already the focus of a channel chief has

gotten so complex just in the channel itself. Right.

If you look at the evolution of that where, as I

said, ten, okay, maybe 15 years ago when I ran an

MSP, 30% of my deals were with someone else and I

could aggregate what I needed to pull together.

It wasn't that complex, right.

I just made it happen.

And then how people bought started to change.

And that whole idea of, am I MSP?

We were an MSP and we were ISV.

I mean, we sold 40% of our revenue was IP

that we put on top of things 15 years ago.

So all this started to get more complex

and I think the focus was here.

And then while the whole alliance piece was

trying to figure out how to get that

act together, here's what I don't think the

alliance act was together all that long ago.

Once again, having been involved, running an incentive company

with multiple Fortune 50 companies trying to sell something

together and being the incentive arm on that and

watching what they did from their marketing and how

they tried to pull the salespeople together and really

how they tried to do it at the end.

I watched 40% of the deals get

unwound at the end of the quarter.

This is on alliances because sales guys that

had a multimillion dollar quota weren't going to

wait for the other end to come around,

unwound the deal, sold it on their own. Okay.

So you got to fight through all that on the alliances.

You got channel getting very complex.

And I don't think it was until

the realization was a couple of things.

If the buyer is insisting on

this, it becomes more efficient.

And then I think organizations like yourself,

I don't know whether you're reactive or proactive.

I think you're proactively reactive, right?

You're listening and seeing.

And then you guys said, okay, we're going to

run with this and you guys can come along.

And I think you guys created, along

with the market conditions and everybody else,

an opportunity to pull this together.

And someone goes, ding.

All right, why doesn't this fit?

And then we could talk forever about corporate infrastructure

and how it makes sense and how you need

to streamline it and how eventually someone's going to

go, what do they have in common?

If there's a partnership, it doesn't matter.

What we're saying is we're dependent on a relationship

of trust with someone else to create a partner

experience that's going to drive the selling motion, that's

going to allow more sales wins.

I think I just set the whole reason exists, right? Yeah.

At the end of the day, it comes

down to sales velocity, at least for me. Right?

If the sales velocity is faster,

direct, let's just go direct.

If it's faster this way, let's go this way. Right?

I know a lot of leaders emphasize on

ASP and these other things, but for me,

it really comes down to sales velocity.

And so whichever way is faster, we should go do that.

Customer preference dictates that anyways then, right?

Yeah.

I think you got customer preference.

I think you got sales velocity.

I think you've got cost of sale. Right?

Let's just be really frank.

If it was just as cost effective to

sell direct as it was to sell through

the channel, the channel wouldn't exist.

No one wants to add complexity to a sale unless

there is a cost benefit analysis, totally, to it, right?

So I think it's velocity, but I think you just

got to be able to do it cost effectively.

Yeah, agreed.

So you gave the enterprise,

let's call it perspective, right?

I think in the mid market and the SMB,

what happened is you have leaders, but the leaders

did not have the operational infrastructure supporting them.

So they're running around justifying their existence

when they should be working on moving

investment from ad hoc to programmatic.

And so there was no operational layer like the notion

of partner operations that exist in large enterprise companies does

not exist in mid market and SMB, and the tech stack

isn't there for them to do it.

Look, the reason again, we're in the enterprise space

is because they've been able to have the resources

to create a tech stack that allows them to

automate everything so that they can go focus on

other things versus creating a spreadsheet and trying to

drive someone's ROI or metrics across that, right?

And I think that's been the big challenge in

the mid market and the SMB, which

I think created an opportunity for people to come

along, there's both sides to it, right?

I would say the SMB and the mid

market were more flexible because people were less worried about

what they can't do and more worried about put there

to solve problems and less red tape.

So what happened is if you double click

on that, right, so the partner leader then

goes and does multiple experiments when there's no

red tape, right, because they're not focused on

repeatability and rigor, they're focused on revenue, right,

because they're like, go do this, right?

And so what happens is you have 17

different partner types enter the company and then

the organization feels the burden of supporting them.

It would be the same thing as for a startup.

2000 PLG customers came in, SMB customers

and five large enterprise came in, right?

They would feel the burden of supporting them, right?

So that then, along with the startup trying to understand,

it's like go to market fit and then trying to

understand how to scale creates a lot of executive friction.

And then when executive friction happens, if you

are a board or a CEO, your first

intuition is to remove the friction.

And so you're going to have your

sales and market leaders there because you

absolutely need them, definitely at that stage.

That's why we did the state of partner operations as

a research report, because we said, look, if you don't

invest in operations, you will always be as a partner

leader, always be thought of as an experiment person, because

you just don't have enough time for stakeholder alignment, which

should be 50% of your time.

But we should be getting past that pretty soon, right?

Once again, I don't think Partnership

L eaders exist just to exist.

I think there is something very much something

said, no one wants to be reactionary, but

I do think it started as well.

There's a negative reactionary.

Like someone comes too late and there's

a positive reactionary and someone witnessed something

and got on it, right?

So I think it's the positive side of it.

I think the question is, how do you make it?

Was it moved to proactive, which finally gets to what

we were going to start the whole podcast on.

Totally, which is great, by the way.

So I want a clip.

So I need a clip.

I need 20 seconds.

What's a CPO? Yeah.

So a Chief Partner Officer for

us right now is somebody that

understands all partner motions, including marketplaces.

Okay.

And that's a big enough job to have a C suite role.

And I also believe this is going to evolve, right.

Because when the CRO role started,

it became this all encompassing role.

It was like a rigid definition that all revenue

functions and marketing and customer success and everything that's

a customer is going to be there. Right.

And what happened then was it was just that

CMOs were more brand focused than demand focused.

And so it just made sense to put the

SDR team and the demand function underneath the CRO.

But then over time, you've seen the

CMOs become extremely demand focused and start

taking ownership of pricing and packaging. Right.

And so you have this resurgence of CMOs. Right.

And so I think that's what's going to

happen with the Chief Partner Officer as well.

There's going to be a consolidation of the

different routes to market, as we call them. Right.

And then from there there's going to be specialization.

And so we'll have to see.

But today my definition is someone that understands

and owns all partner motions, including marketplaces, and

then we'll see how it evolves.

It's so interesting and fascinating for me because I

actually lived this right, where I was a channel

chief and then owned alliances at the same time.

So back then, being a channel chief and owning alliance,

no one was calling me a Chief Partnership Officer because

once again, CPO was a Chief Product Officer.

So I've actually walked in those

shoes for a little bit.

It's a pretty, pretty fascinating role.

So how do channel chiefs now

today, how should they view this?

How should they look at a CPO?

Should they want to be a CPO?

How does it fit in on an org chart?

Like, really just get down to

the brass tacks of it, right?

What's the opportunity?

How do you get there?

And do you want it? Yeah, totally.

And so it's interesting, we're

about to launch two reports.

One is literally called the Chief Partner Officer.

It actually goes into exactly this.

And I'll share some information, but

it actually goes into this topic. Right.

And we're also about to launch the

State of Partner Ecosystem, or Platform Ecosystem.

Sorry, exactly.

The State of Platform Ecosystems

with our friends at HubSpot. Right.

And so the reason why both of these reports

exist is to actually show that in some companies,

the channel chiefs actually do own all partner functions.

Right.

But in many companies, they don't, in a number

of companies, actually own a part of the channel.

They don't even own all of the

channel traditionally what we call the channel. Right.

The question then becomes that if you were

to elevate yourself to then create a larger

organization that is responsible for all partner motions,

then can you effectively create a bigger impact?

Because all of partnering is managed by one. Right?

So that means there could be 30

different partner programs, 20 different incentive plans,

four different regions, five different geographies.

All the things that we have to do on the direct

side, they have to be done on the indirect side, too.

Right?

I believe there's an opportunity to do that also.

What we have seen is not all of

those, or maybe a majority of those.

I think that's what the data says.

Channel chiefs report to the CEO.

And so we believe there's an opportunity where this

group can elevate themselves and start sitting in the

C suite organization and actually build the business.

Because if you really think about it, you

go all the way to almost all.

Every partner person that I've met, every good partner

person I've met, they have two things, right?

They're connectors and they're builders, but they don't

sit at this table where other connectors and

builders or senior connectors and builders sit.

So I think they have the traits and they have

the experience, and they just haven't taken that step.

So I'm not an expert in this today.

We're building expertise as we're going, right?

So the next body of work that we have to

do is why haven't the current leaders taken that step?

Or why haven't the CEOs looked

at this much more closely? Right.

I'm sure there were reasons in the past, and there's

current reasons to go look at this, but maybe now

is the time to actually do it right again, like

I said, we are not creating any movement.

We're just picking the things that are happening

in the marketplace and then taking steps logically

to support every type of partner leader.

So do you see this accelerated?

I was going to ask you the

standard ending question of any podcast.

So, Asher, what does this look like in two years? Right?

And part of it is you guys are reactionary,

but I'm sure you have your own thoughts because

you're reactionary, but even in that, you're seeing the

trajectory and the acceleration of all these conversations.

So my perspective is going to look very different in

two years, and the CEO's ears are perking up.

Here's what I think is going to happen is

because this is going to become standard nomenclature.

And from Forrester to Catalyst,

everybody's talking about this, right?

There are T-shirts at Catalyst that said CPO now.

It's close to becoming a meme.

Then it is.

I say this is analogous to AI

and that it's not going anywhere.

It is only going to accelerate.

And there's some great truths out there, and

there's some non truths out there, too.

And everybody's trying to figure

out what's the direction.

And I think, most importantly, so many people are

trying to figure out, where do I contribute?

How do I contribute, and how

do I actually not be reactionary?

I think that's going to be the key, right?

How do I take everything I know?

How do I leverage people and resources like yourself, and

then how do I build my career on this, right?

I think that's the interesting side of it.

So I'm an opportunist.

I see it as just a massive opportunity for everybody.

And I would say, to answer your question specifically,

I don't actually know where it'll go, right.

Because the market changes, and we've

seen market changes pretty quickly.

But what I do know is that our members

are working to upskill themselves to be able to

take this opportunity if it became available.

Now all of us have to come

together and drive this industry change.

But when that happens, we do need leaders that

are ready to take advantage of those opportunities.

Because in the mid market, right, like, if you look

at companies at 100 million in ARR, to, like, 1

billion in ARR, there's about 225,000 companies in there.

Let's just say 2000 of them needed CPOs.

I don't believe 2000 CPOs exist today.

Again, that just may be me, but

I don't believe that they exist today.

So even if you got 2000 CPOs, which is

kind of the promise we made at Catalyst with

our friends from Workspan, would be a great achievement,

because ten years ago, the 10,000 Chief Customer Officers

did not exist. Four years ago. Right.

So, once again, I think this is moving pretty fast.

Okay.

So, once again, thank you for joining us, Asher.

It sounds like you've got a couple of

very cool pieces of content coming out.

What's the best way to get connected with you?

What's the best way to

get connected with Partnership Leaders?

Yeah, the best way to connect with me is on LinkedIn.

It's Asher Mathew, and the best way to

connect with Partnership Leaders, also through LinkedIn.

Just go to our LinkedIn company page.

It's also called Partnership Leaders.

And you can follow us.

And then as you feel motivated to take the next

step in up leveling yourself and elevating yourself and your

team, then you can apply to be a member.

And we'd love to build this with you. One last thing.

You guys do a lot of events.

You guys bring people together.

When's your next event?

So our next event is on November 14.

It's actually in San Francisco.

And then after that, we have an event in

December in Austin to basically close the year out.

And then we'll kick the year

off at ImpartnerCon in February.

We announced earlier this week that we're actually

building Impartnercon with Impartner, which is something

that, again, no community has ever done before. Right.

But we believe that we need to provide a lot

of connection points for all of us to meet, and

then we build deeper relationships, and then we build and

put those relationships into action, and then we elevate ourselves.

Fantastic.

So again, Asher, thank you for joining us.

Listeners and viewers, thank you for joining us.

Everybody. Have a great day.