Credit Union Regulatory Guidance Including: NCUA, CFPB, FDIC, OCC, FFIEC

www.marktreichel.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/mark-treichel/



Hello, this is Samantha Shares. This episode covers Interagency Guidance on Lending to Individuals Not Legally Authorized to Work in the United States.

The following is an audio version of that document. This podcast is educational and is not legal advice. We are sponsored by Credit Union Exam Solutions Incorporated, whose team has over two hundred and forty years of National Credit Union Administration experience. We assist our clients with N C U A so they save time and money. If you are worried about a recent, upcoming, or in process N C U A examination, reach out to learn how they can assist at Mark Treichel dot com. Also check out our other podcast called With Flying Colors where we provide tips on how to achieve success with N C U A.

And now the document.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. National Credit Union Administration. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. July thirteenth, twenty twenty-six.

Interagency Guidance on Lending to Individuals Not Legally Authorized to Work in the United States.

On May nineteenth, twenty twenty-six, the President issued the Executive Order, Restoring Integrity to America's Financial System, to address risks to the financial system posed by the extension of credit or financial services to the inadmissible and removable population. In accordance with the Executive Order, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, Treasury, referred to as the O C C, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, referred to as the F D I C, and the National Credit Union Administration, referred to as the N C U A, and collectively referred to as the agencies, are issuing this guidance to remind supervised financial institutions of their existing obligations with respect to credit risk management, particularly as it relates to borrowers who are not legally authorized to work in the United States, referred to as non-work authorized borrowers.

Credit Risk and Underwriting Considerations.

Lending to individuals who are not legally authorized to work in the United States may present elevated credit risk because a borrower's ability to generate income, maintain employment, and remain financially stable may be subject to greater uncertainty. As with all lending activities, financial institutions should identify, measure, monitor, and control these risks through safe and sound underwriting practices that assess a borrower's willingness and capacity to repay according to the terms of the credit obligation.

Safe and sound underwriting is a key risk-management tool that helps financial institutions evaluate whether a borrower can repay a credit obligation according to its terms. Such underwriting includes assessing the source of repayment, the borrower's repayment capacity, and the borrower's overall financial condition, resources, and willingness to repay as agreed. When lending to non-work authorized borrowers, financial institutions should consider whether uncertainties related to employment authorization may affect the stability and sustainability of income, repayment capacity, collateral recovery, or other factors relevant to credit risk.

The following sections discuss key underwriting considerations related to the source of repayment, collateral considerations, documentation and verification, portfolio and concentration considerations, and consumer compliance risk.

Source of Repayment.

Underwriting standards typically consider the stability and sustainability of a borrower's income and the likelihood that the income will continue throughout the term of the credit obligation.

In retail lending, wages or self-employment income are often the primary source of repayment. When a borrower's income is derived from employment that is not legally authorized, the source of repayment may be less reliable and may present increased credit risk for various reasons, including: employment termination due to an employee not having legal work authorization; employment suspension or termination after discovering that an employee's employment authorization is expired; the borrower's inability to become lawfully reemployed; or the borrower's removal from the United States.

Financial institutions should consider whether projected repayment capacity remains adequate under various scenarios including potential interruptions in employment or income resulting from the borrower's inability to maintain lawful employment.

Collateral Considerations.

Financial institutions may face additional challenges enforcing security interests in collateralized loans, as it may be more difficult to contact non-work authorized borrowers or locate and repossess unaffixed collateral, such as automobiles, recreational vehicles, and boats.

Documentation and Verification.

Financial institutions might consider whether employment income is current, verifiable, stable, and likely to continue. Financial institutions might consider, as relevant, requiring and reviewing paystubs, W two forms, tax returns, employer verifications, bank statements, or evidence of continuing work authorization. Financial institutions may consider whether loans to non-work authorized borrowers, individually or in segments, exhibit signs of credit weakness regardless of delinquency status for classification purposes and treatment in the allowance for credit losses.

Portfolio and Concentration Risk Considerations.

Financial institutions with significant lending exposure to borrowers concentrated in specific geographic markets, employers, or industries that may be disproportionately affected by changes in immigration enforcement, employment verification practices, labor availability, or workforce disruptions may face elevated concentration risk. These changes could adversely affect the repayment capacity of multiple borrowers simultaneously. As a result, financial institutions may experience correlated credit deterioration within affected segments of the portfolio rather than isolated borrower-level stress.

Consumer Compliance Risk.

On June eighth, twenty twenty-six, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, referred to as the C F P B, issued the Statement on Ability To Repay and Immigration Status, to remind creditors of their obligations under the Truth in Lending Act, referred to as T I L A, as implemented by Regulation Z. As the C F P B observes, under T I L A and Regulation Z, before lending to consumers for dwelling secured transactions like mortgages, creditors must make a reasonable and good faith determination at or before consummation that the consumer will have a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms. Regulation Z sets forth parameters that lenders must follow to make such reasonable and good faith determinations of a customer's ability to repay applicable consumer credit products. Further, the C F P B advises that credit card issuers must consider the consumer's ability to make required minimum periodic payments.

The C F P B advises that, when determining repayment ability, creditors relying on an individual's income derived from United States based employment are permitted, and may, under certain facts and circumstances, be obligated, to consider information that bears on the consumer's underlying and continuing ability to earn income, when residency in the United States is a necessary component of such employment.

With respect to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, referred to as E C O A, as implemented by Regulation B, the C F P B observes that E C O A expressly states that a creditor may take the applicant's immigration status into account, and that a creditor may consider the applicant's immigration status or status as a permanent resident of the United States, and any additional information that may be necessary to ascertain the creditor's rights and remedies regarding repayment.

Consistent with applicable laws and regulations, financial institutions should consider the risks associated with non-work authorized borrowers in underwriting and account management policies and processes. Financial institutions are advised to review the C F P B's June eighth, twenty twenty-six, Statement on Ability To Repay and Immigration Status in light of the compliance obligations set forth in T I L A and Regulation Z as well as E C O A and Regulation B.

This concludes the document.

If your credit union could use assistance with your exam, reach out to Mark Treichel on LinkedIn or at Mark Treichel dot com. This is Samantha Shares, and we thank you for listening.


Are you worried about an NCUA exam in process or looming on the horizon? Don't face it alone!

We're ex-NCUA insiders with decades of experience, ready to guide you to success. Our team understands the intricacies of NCUA examinations from the inside out.

Hire us and gain:

• Peace of mind during your exam process

• Insider knowledge of NCUA procedures and expectations

• Strategies to address potential issues before they become problems

• Continuous access to our extensive subject matter expertise

With our access retainer, you'll have on-demand support from former NCUA experts. We're here to ensure your credit union achieves flying colors in its next examination.

Contact Credit Union Exam Solutions today to learn more about our services and how we can help your credit union succeed.

What is Credit Union Regulatory Guidance Including: NCUA, CFPB, FDIC, OCC, FFIEC?

This podcast provides you the ability to listen to new regulatory guidance issued by the National Credit Union Administration, and occasionally the F D I C, the O C C, the F F I E C, or the C F P B. We will focus on new and material agency guidance, and historically important and still active guidance from past years that NCUA cites in examinations or conversations. This podcast is educational only and is not legal advice. We are sponsored by Credit Union Exam Solutions Incorporated. We also have another podcast called With Flying Colors where we provide tips for achieving success with the N C U A examination process and discuss hot topics that impact your credit union.

Samantha: Hello, this is Samantha Shares.

This episode covers Interagency Guidance
on Lending to Individuals Not Legally

Authorized to Work in the United States.

The following is an audio
version of that document.

This podcast is educational
and is not legal advice.

We are sponsored by Credit Union
Exam Solutions Incorporated, whose

team has over two hundred and
forty years of National Credit

Union Administration experience.

We assist our clients with N C
U A so they save time and money.

If you are worried about a recent,
upcoming, or in process N C U A

examination, reach out to learn how they
can assist at Mark Treichel dot com.

Also check out our other podcast called
With Flying Colors where we provide tips

on how to achieve success with N C U A.

And now the document.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

National Credit Union Administration.

Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.

July thirteenth, twenty twenty-six.

Interagency Guidance on Lending to
Individuals Not Legally Authorized

to Work in the United States.

On May nineteenth, twenty twenty-six,
the President issued the Executive

Order, Restoring Integrity to America's
Financial System, to address risks to the

financial system posed by the extension
of credit or financial services to the

inadmissible and removable population.

In accordance with the Executive Order,
the Office of the Comptroller of the

Currency, Treasury, referred to as the
O C C, the Federal Deposit Insurance

Corporation, referred to as the F D
I C, and the National Credit Union

Administration, referred to as the N C
U A, and collectively referred to as the

agencies, are issuing this guidance to
remind supervised financial institutions

of their existing obligations with
respect to credit risk management,

particularly as it relates to borrowers
who are not legally authorized to

work in the United States, referred
to as non-work authorized borrowers.

Credit Risk and
Underwriting Considerations.

Lending to individuals who are not
legally authorized to work in the United

States may present elevated credit
risk because a borrower's ability to

generate income, maintain employment,
and remain financially stable may

be subject to greater uncertainty.

As with all lending activities, financial
institutions should identify, measure,

monitor, and control these risks through
safe and sound underwriting practices

that assess a borrower's willingness
and capacity to repay according to

the terms of the credit obligation.

Safe and sound underwriting is a
key risk-management tool that helps

financial institutions evaluate
whether a borrower can repay a credit

obligation according to its terms.

Such underwriting includes assessing
the source of repayment, the borrower's

repayment capacity, and the borrower's
overall financial condition, resources,

and willingness to repay as agreed.

When lending to non-work authorized
borrowers, financial institutions should

consider whether uncertainties related to
employment authorization may affect the

stability and sustainability of income,
repayment capacity, collateral recovery,

or other factors relevant to credit risk.

The following sections discuss key
underwriting considerations related

to the source of repayment, collateral
considerations, documentation

and verification, portfolio and
concentration considerations,

and consumer compliance risk.

Source of Repayment.

Underwriting standards typically consider
the stability and sustainability of a

borrower's income and the likelihood
that the income will continue throughout

the term of the credit obligation.

In retail lending, wages or
self-employment income are often

the primary source of repayment.

When a borrower's income is derived
from employment that is not legally

authorized, the source of repayment
may be less reliable and may present

increased credit risk for various reasons,
including: employment termination due

to an employee not having legal work
authorization; employment suspension

or termination after discovering that
an employee's employment authorization

is expired; the borrower's inability
to become lawfully reemployed; or the

borrower's removal from the United States.

Financial institutions should
consider whether projected repayment

capacity remains adequate under
various scenarios including potential

interruptions in employment or income
resulting from the borrower's inability

to maintain lawful employment.

Collateral Considerations.

Financial institutions may face additional
challenges enforcing security interests

in collateralized loans, as it may be more
difficult to contact non-work authorized

borrowers or locate and repossess
unaffixed collateral, such as automobiles,

recreational vehicles, and boats.

Documentation and Verification.

Financial institutions might
consider whether employment

income is current, verifiable,
stable, and likely to continue.

Financial institutions might
consider, as relevant, requiring

and reviewing paystubs, W two forms,
tax returns, employer verifications,

bank statements, or evidence of
continuing work authorization.

Financial institutions may consider
whether loans to non-work authorized

borrowers, individually or in segments,
exhibit signs of credit weakness

regardless of delinquency status for
classification purposes and treatment

in the allowance for credit losses.

Portfolio and Concentration
Risk Considerations.

Financial institutions with significant
lending exposure to borrowers

concentrated in specific geographic
markets, employers, or industries that

may be disproportionately affected by
changes in immigration enforcement,

employment verification practices, labor
availability, or workforce disruptions

may face elevated concentration risk.

These changes could adversely
affect the repayment capacity of

multiple borrowers simultaneously.

As a result, financial institutions
may experience correlated credit

deterioration within affected
segments of the portfolio rather

than isolated borrower-level stress.

Consumer Compliance Risk.

On June eighth, twenty twenty-six, the
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau,

referred to as the C F P B, issued
the Statement on Ability To Repay and

Immigration Status, to remind creditors
of their obligations under the Truth

in Lending Act, referred to as T I
L A, as implemented by Regulation Z.

As the C F P B observes, under T I L A and
Regulation Z, before lending to consumers

for dwelling secured transactions
like mortgages, creditors must make a

reasonable and good faith determination
at or before consummation that the

consumer will have a reasonable ability
to repay the loan according to its terms.

Regulation Z sets forth parameters
that lenders must follow to make such

reasonable and good faith determinations
of a customer's ability to repay

applicable consumer credit products.

Further, the C F P B advises that
credit card issuers must consider

the consumer's ability to make
required minimum periodic payments.

The C F P B advises that, when determining
repayment ability, creditors relying

on an individual's income derived
from United States based employment

are permitted, and may, under certain
facts and circumstances, be obligated,

to consider information that bears
on the consumer's underlying and

continuing ability to earn income, when
residency in the United States is a

necessary component of such employment.

With respect to the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act, referred to as E C O A,

as implemented by Regulation B, the C F P
B observes that E C O A expressly states

that a creditor may take the applicant's
immigration status into account, and that

a creditor may consider the applicant's
immigration status or status as a

permanent resident of the United States,
and any additional information that may

be necessary to ascertain the creditor's
rights and remedies regarding repayment.

Consistent with applicable laws and
regulations, financial institutions

should consider the risks associated
with non-work authorized borrowers

in underwriting and account
management policies and processes.

Financial institutions are advised
to review the C F P B's June eighth,

twenty twenty-six, Statement on Ability
To Repay and Immigration Status in

light of the compliance obligations
set forth in T I L A and Regulation Z

as well as E C O A and Regulation B.

This concludes the document.

If your credit union could use assistance
with your exam, reach out to Mark Treichel

on LinkedIn or at Mark Treichel dot com.

This is Samantha Shares, and
we thank you for listening.