Lynch & Owens Podcast - A Massachusetts Divorce & Family Law Podcast

On today's podcast, we explore the background and experience of Lynch & Owens managing partner and attorney, James M. Lynch

Creators and Guests

Writer
James M. Lynch
Managing partner, senior attorney and blog writer at Lynch & Owens, P.C.

What is Lynch & Owens Podcast - A Massachusetts Divorce & Family Law Podcast?

We are a podcast focused on Massachusetts divorce and family law issues, brought to you by the attorneys of Lynch & Owens, PC.

Our podcasts are generated by Google NotebookLM, an artificial intelligence platform, based on blogs created by the attorneys of Lynch & Owens, P.C. of Hingham, Massachusetts. Note that the opinions offered in the show are generated by artificial intelligence and may differ from the source material. Neither our blogs nor our podcasts are legal advice.

Follow our podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or through our RSS feed.

Host 1:

Welcome back everybody for another deep dive. This time, we're gonna try and get to know James m Lynch. Okay. A seasoned attorney with Lynch and Owens Mhmm. In Massachusetts.

Host 2:

Interesting.

Host 1:

And what we're trying to figure out is what makes him tick. You know? Yeah. What sets him apart from all the other

Host 2:

Right.

Host 1:

Lawyers out there? Yeah. And we've got a pretty fascinating set of sources here to dig into.

Host 2:

Oh, okay.

Host 1:

We've got his firm's website, of course.

Host 2:

Yeah.

Host 1:

We've got transcripts from some videos where he actually, you know, lays out his legal approach. Oh, cool. And we've got some other, you know, interesting tidbits here and there.

Host 2:

Sounds like fun.

Host 1:

It's gonna be like piecing together a puzzle Yeah. To get a clearer picture of this guy as a lawyer.

Host 2:

I love it. It's like being a legal detective.

Host 1:

Exactly.

Host 2:

So what caught your eye first?

Host 1:

Well, I gotta say, his background.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

He spent eight years as a criminal prosecutor in Suffolk County. Handling some pretty serious cases like shootings

Host 2:

Yeah.

Host 1:

Stabbings, you name it.

Host 2:

Oh, wow. Okay.

Host 1:

So I immediately thought, what's it like to go from, you know, putting people behind bars to fighting for their rights Mhmm. In a completely different area of law?

Host 2:

That's a big change.

Host 1:

It is. It's a huge change.

Host 2:

It's not something you see every day in a legal career. No. It really makes you think. Yeah. How did those early experiences as a prosecutor, you know

Host 1:

Right.

Host 2:

Shape his perspective?

Host 1:

Exactly. And it's not just the prosecutor thing.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

After that, he spent twelve years in insurance defense

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

And personal injury law

Host 2:

Got it.

Host 1:

Before he even got to what he does now, which is family law

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

And personal injury at Lynch and Owens.

Host 2:

So that's a pretty wide range of legal fields.

Host 1:

It is.

Host 2:

I mean, that kind of suggests that he's got a really deep understanding of the legal system.

Host 1:

Yeah. But from

Host 2:

a lot of different angles

Host 1:

For sure.

Host 2:

It makes you wonder if those different experiences give him some kind of unique edge.

Host 1:

Yeah.

Host 2:

You know what I mean? Totally.

Host 1:

It's like he's been in the trenches, right, on both sides of the aisle, so to speak. Yeah. And that's gotta give him a different perspective. Right?

Host 2:

Definitely. But let's

Host 1:

not get ahead of ourselves. Okay. Let's unpack what he's doing now at Lynch and Owens.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

It seems like a lot of his cases, you know, they're emotionally charged. Yeah. Divorces, child custody disputes, restraining orders, that kind of thing.

Host 2:

Right. Right.

Host 1:

Those are areas where people need more than just, you know, a lawyer who knows the law.

Host 2:

Exactly.

Host 1:

They need someone who gets it. You know? Absolutely. Someone who understands what they're going through emotionally

Host 2:

Mhmm.

Host 1:

And can be both a strong advocate, but also a compassionate guide.

Host 2:

I agree.

Host 1:

Speaking of compassionate guide

Host 2:

Yeah.

Host 1:

In one of his videos, he talks about child support cases.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

Specifically, those involving unmarried parents.

Host 2:

Got it.

Host 1:

And he really stresses fairness

Host 2:

Mhmm.

Host 1:

And consistency

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

Regardless of whether the parents were married or not.

Host 2:

That's important.

Host 1:

It is.

Host 2:

It's like he's saying, look. I care about what's best for the child, not about, you know, any biases or societal judgments.

Host 1:

Exactly.

Host 2:

But how does he actually do that?

Host 1:

Yeah. How does he put it into action?

Host 2:

You know? Like, does he have a specific approach or a strategy that makes him different?

Host 1:

He does. He mentions that in Massachusetts, the courts use the same child support formula

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

For all cases, whether the parents were married or not.

Host 2:

Interesting.

Host 1:

So he's working within a system that already aims for fairness.

Host 2:

Right.

Host 1:

But it's how he uses that system that seems to be key.

Host 2:

That makes sense.

Host 1:

Yeah.

Host 2:

So he's not just accepting things the way they are.

Host 1:

Right.

Host 2:

He's actually using the existing laws Mhmm. To really advocate for his clients.

Host 1:

Exactly.

Host 2:

That's cool.

Host 1:

And he's not afraid to explain those complex calculations to his clients either.

Host 2:

Yeah.

Host 1:

In another video, he breaks down alimony versus child support.

Host 2:

Mhmm.

Host 1:

And he talks about things like parenting time

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

And each parent's earning capacity.

Host 2:

Got it.

Host 1:

He's all about transparency. You know? Yeah.

Host 2:

That's huge.

Host 1:

Making sure his clients really understand what's going on. Yeah. Okay. Now this is where things get really interesting.

Host 2:

Okay. I'm listening.

Host 1:

He talks about using something called shuttle diplomacy.

Host 2:

Shuttle diplomacy. Yeah. What's that?

Host 1:

It's a technique he uses in high conflict divorces.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

Basically, instead of having the couple in the same room

Host 2:

Right.

Host 1:

He acts as a go between.

Host 2:

Interesting.

Host 1:

Tries to deescalate the tension. You know?

Host 2:

I see.

Host 1:

Find some common ground.

Host 2:

That's fascinating. Right? I've heard of that technique.

Host 1:

Yeah.

Host 2:

But I never thought about it for family law.

Host 1:

That's pretty cool.

Host 2:

So what are the advantages of using shuttle diplomacy?

Host 1:

Well, he says it can be especially helpful when there's a lot of hostility between the parties.

Host 2:

Makes sense.

Host 1:

Because you're removing that face to face interaction. Yeah.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

So he can filter out some of the emotional heat Okay. And hopefully facilitate a more productive conversation.

Host 2:

I can see that. But I wonder, are there any downsides?

Host 1:

Wow. That's a good question.

Host 2:

Does it slow things down at all or maybe make it harder for people to really own their decisions?

Host 1:

Those are great questions. Yeah. I'm curious to hear what else he has to say about his mediation techniques.

Host 2:

Me too.

Host 1:

It sounds like shuttle diplomacy is just one tool in his toolbox. You know?

Host 2:

Definitely. And it really shows how flexible he

Host 1:

is Yeah.

Host 2:

And how willing he is to adjust his approach Right. To fit the specific dynamics of each case.

Host 1:

For sure. He's like a legal chess player. You know? Always thinking a few steps ahead Yeah. Trying to anticipate those roadblocks and figure out ways around them.

Host 2:

Yeah. I get it.

Host 1:

He even talks about how important it is to be prepared Okay. For pretrial conferences.

Host 2:

Oh, yeah. Those are crucial.

Host 1:

They really are.

Host 2:

It's like where everything comes out. Right? Exactly. Financial stuff, all the issues that are still being fought over.

Host 1:

Yep.

Host 2:

It's the last chance to settle things before going to trial.

Host 1:

It is. And he doesn't just focus on getting himself and his client ready.

Host 2:

Oh.

Host 1:

He actually makes his clients and the other lawyer

Host 2:

Mhmm.

Host 1:

Meet a whole week before the pretrial conference

Host 2:

Wow.

Host 1:

To try to iron out as many issues as possible.

Host 2:

That's smart.

Host 1:

It is. It's all about streamlining things. You know? Yeah. Making it less adversarial.

Host 2:

Trying to save everyone some time and money and probably a lot of stress.

Host 1:

Exactly.

Host 2:

But he's trying to find solutions before things escalate.

Host 1:

Yeah. He's all about being proactive.

Host 2:

I like that.

Host 1:

And this attention to detail, it goes beyond the courtroom. Okay. He gives his clients some really practical advice.

Host 2:

Like what?

Host 1:

About their online presence.

Host 2:

Oh, interesting.

Host 1:

He's very blunt about it. He says, you know

Host 2:

What does he say?

Host 1:

If you don't want a judge to see something you wrote in an email Yeah. Or a text Mhmm. Or on social media

Host 2:

Right.

Host 1:

Don't write it.

Host 2:

That's good advice.

Host 1:

It is. It's so easy to forget that stuff can come back to haunt you. Right?

Host 2:

Yeah. Absolutely.

Host 1:

Especially in a legal case.

Host 2:

Totally.

Host 1:

It all goes back to thinking strategically. Right?

Host 2:

Mhmm.

Host 1:

Considering all the angles Being

Host 2:

smart about it.

Host 1:

It's not just about winning in court. Yeah. You know? It's about helping clients protect themselves

Host 2:

Making good decisions.

Host 1:

In the long run.

Host 2:

Thinking ahead.

Host 1:

Exactly. And, you know, it's interesting how he blends that prosecutorial background with this more collaborative problem solving approach.

Host 2:

It's an interesting mix.

Host 1:

It is.

Host 2:

It's not just about arguing. You know?

Host 1:

Right.

Host 2:

It's about finding what works for everyone.

Host 1:

Absolutely. And speaking of finding solutions Yeah. We haven't even touched on his expertise in father's rights cases.

Host 2:

Oh, right.

Host 1:

It seems like he's really passionate

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

About advocating for fathers Mhmm. To have fair and equal access to their kids.

Host 2:

That's a big one, especially in family law.

Host 1:

It is.

Host 2:

There can be a lot of preconceived notions in that area.

Host 1:

Yeah. For sure.

Host 2:

So what's his take on all that?

Host 1:

He's very clear about his belief

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

That both parents should have equal rights and responsibilities Mhmm. No matter their gender.

Host 2:

Got it.

Host 1:

He seems to really push back against any assumptions

Host 2:

Yeah.

Host 1:

Or stereotypes

Host 2:

Right.

Host 1:

That might put fathers at a disadvantage

Host 2:

That makes sense.

Host 1:

In custody disputes.

Host 2:

So how does that actually play out in his legal strategy?

Host 1:

Well, he gets into the whole shared physical custody thing

Host 2:

Oh, right.

Host 1:

Which, as you know, is becoming more and more common these days. Yeah. And he points out that Yeah. Contrary to what a lot of people think Mhmm. Shared physical custody Yeah.

Host 1:

Doesn't automatically mean a fifty fifty split.

Host 2:

Oh, really?

Host 1:

Yeah. There are specific things that the courts look

Host 2:

at. Interesting. Yeah. I always thought shared physical custody meant an equal division of time. Mhmm.

Host 2:

So what are those factors?

Host 1:

Okay. So he lays out four key things.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

The first one is a shared parenting vision.

Host 2:

What does that mean?

Host 1:

Basically, the parents need to be on the same page

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

About how they wanna raise their kids.

Host 2:

Makes sense. Right. If they have totally different ideas about discipline Yeah. Or values or whatever

Host 1:

Right.

Host 2:

Then maybe shared custody isn't the best Exactly. For the kid. I mean okay. So what's the second thing?

Host 1:

The second thing is the ability to get along.

Host 2:

Oh, that's a big one. It is. Especially for couples going through a divorce. Right. I bet that's where his mediation skills come in handy.

Host 1:

I was just thinking that. Yeah. He probably uses that shuttle diplomacy thing.

Host 2:

To help the parents, you know Yeah. Find some middle ground,

Host 1:

come

Host 2:

up with a parenting plan that actually works.

Host 1:

Exactly.

Host 2:

It sounds like he's using everything he's learned

Host 1:

Right.

Host 2:

From his time in court to his mediation work

Host 1:

Mhmm.

Host 2:

To help the families figure things out.

Host 1:

That's pretty impressive.

Host 2:

It is.

Host 1:

Okay. So the third hallmark Yeah. Is geographical proximity.

Host 2:

Oh, right. They need to live close to each other.

Host 1:

Yeah. It's gotta be practical.

Host 2:

Yeah. You know? Definitely.

Host 1:

It wouldn't make sense to have a kid constantly going back and forth

Host 2:

Yeah.

Host 1:

If the parents live hours apart.

Host 2:

Totally.

Host 1:

And then the final thing Mhmm. Is having work arrangements

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

That allow for shared custody.

Host 2:

Right. Like, if one parent is always traveling

Host 1:

Exactly.

Host 2:

It might not work. It would So it sounds like he's really thinking about the big picture

Host 1:

He is.

Host 2:

Not just about the legal stuff

Host 1:

Mhmm.

Host 2:

But also about the real world impact

Host 1:

For sure.

Host 2:

On the kids and the families.

Host 1:

That's what it's all about. Exactly. You know, it's funny. We talked about his diverse background. Yeah.

Host 1:

All those different areas of of law he's worked in. Right. Well, it turns out his time as a criminal prosecutor Mhmm. Has actually had a big impact.

Host 2:

Really? Yeah. I'm curious. How does being a prosecutor translate?

Host 1:

Well, he talks about this in one of the videos.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

He says that even though there are no jury trials Right. In Massachusetts family court

Host 2:

Mhmm.

Host 1:

Those core skills he honed as a prosecutor

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

They've been super valuable.

Host 2:

Makes sense.

Host 1:

Things like building a strong case, anticipating the other side's arguments

Host 2:

Yeah.

Host 1:

Presenting evidence effectively.

Host 2:

Important stuff.

Host 1:

All of that transfers over to what he does now.

Host 2:

So it's like he has this extra layer of expertise.

Host 1:

Yeah. Maybe gives him an advantage in the courtroom. He even applies those skills to his work with restraining orders.

Host 2:

Oh, those can be tough cases.

Host 1:

They are.

Host 2:

A lot of emotion involved.

Host 1:

Yeah.

Host 2:

What does he have to say about them?

Host 1:

Well, he explains the different types of restraining orders and the level of proof needed for each one.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

He says cases involving actual physical harm Yeah. Are usually easier to prove

Host 2:

Makes sense.

Host 1:

Than those based on fear.

Host 2:

Right. Because you have to show that the fear is reasonable.

Host 1:

Exactly. He says the judges really scrutinize that Mhmm. The reasonable fear concept.

Host 2:

It can't just be that someone feels afraid. Right.

Host 1:

Right.

Host 2:

There has to be a real basis for it.

Host 1:

Exactly. The judge has to look at the evidence.

Host 2:

And decide if the fear is justified.

Host 1:

Right. It's not just about someone's feelings.

Host 2:

It's about whether those feelings are objectively reasonable Yep. Based on what actually happened.

Host 1:

It sounds like he really knows how to navigate those complexities.

Host 2:

Yeah. It seems like he's got a good grasp of what the judges are looking for

Host 1:

He does.

Host 2:

And how to present a case that meets those legal standards.

Host 1:

For sure. Yeah. He's really good at taking these complicated legal issues

Host 2:

Yeah.

Host 1:

And breaking them down, you know Mhmm. Explaining things in a way that's easy to understand

Host 2:

Right.

Host 1:

But also reassuring for his clients.

Host 2:

It's like he's not just focused on the legal side of things. He's actually trying to help people

Host 1:

Yeah.

Host 2:

You know, get through a tough time.

Host 1:

Exactly.

Host 2:

And I think that's where his experience really shines through.

Host 1:

It does.

Host 2:

He's been there on both sides.

Host 1:

He has.

Host 2:

He's dealt with all sorts of legal issues, and he's seen how these cases can really affect people.

Host 1:

Right. So he gets it.

Host 2:

He does.

Host 1:

And that makes him a better advocate

Host 2:

Absolutely.

Host 1:

Because he can combine that legal expertise

Host 2:

Yeah.

Host 1:

With that human touch. You know?

Host 2:

It's a powerful combo.

Host 1:

It is.

Host 2:

It makes you wonder what's the one thing he would tell someone.

Host 1:

Oh, that's a good question.

Host 2:

Who's facing a legal problem?

Host 1:

He actually talks about that in one of the videos.

Host 2:

Really?

Host 1:

Yeah. He says the most important thing is to find a lawyer you trust. Mhmm. Someone you feel comfortable with.

Host 2:

Right.

Host 1:

Someone who will listen to you Yeah. Explain things clearly Mhmm. And fight for your best interests.

Host 2:

That's great advice.

Host 1:

It is.

Host 2:

Finding the right lawyer can make all the difference.

Host 1:

Absolutely. And I think our deep dive into James m Lynch

Host 2:

Mhmm.

Host 1:

Has given us a pretty good idea of what that kind of representation looks like.

Host 2:

It has.

Host 1:

It's about more than just winning. You know? Right. It's about finding solutions that work for everyone Mhmm. And helping people move forward with their lives.

Host 2:

I agree. It's been really fascinating

Host 1:

It has.

Host 2:

To learn about his story

Host 1:

Yeah.

Host 2:

And see how all his different experiences have shaped the way he practices law.

Host 1:

It really shows how important it is to be adaptable. You know? Yeah. To have that experience and to genuinely care about your clients.

Host 2:

It does.

Host 1:

Well, that about wraps up our deep dive into James m Lynch.

Host 2:

Okay.

Host 1:

But we wanna leave you with one final question to think about.

Host 2:

Alright. I'm listening What

Host 1:

qualities do you value most in a lawyer?

Host 2:

That's a good one.

Host 1:

Right. Yeah. Food for thought.

Host 2:

Definitely.

Host 1:

Until next time.

Host 2:

Yeah.