The Honest Money Show

🎙️ Welcome to Episode 1 of The Honest Money Show

In our inaugural episode, Joe Bryan explores the fundamental flaws of the current financial system, focusing on the existence of a “big red button” that enables monetary corruption. He explains how inflation is a direct result of unchecked money printing and how deflation represents the natural state of a healthy economy.

Joe shares his journey from traditional finance to becoming a Bitcoin advocate, highlighting the impact of economic pressures on family dynamics, the housing market, and pensions. He discusses how poor monetary policy and inflation erode quality of life, and how financial decisions can shape long-term personal outcomes.

The conversation also covers Bitcoin’s potential as a solution to the current financial crisis, promoting self-sovereignty and financial independence, and empowering individuals against state control. Joe touches on the political and societal implications of Bitcoin adoption, the nature of value in the context of cryptocurrency, and why he believes Bitcoin represents the most asymmetric bet of all time, with the potential to become a dominant medium of exchange in the future.

🔑 Key Takeaways:

The existence of a ‘big red button’ allows for monetary corruption.
Fixing money is essential to fixing societal issues.
Inflation is caused by money printing, not external factors.
Deflation is the natural state of a healthy economy.
Housing markets are influenced by monetary policy and speculation.
Poor monetary policy impacts family dynamics and pensions.
Bitcoin offers a solution to the financial system’s flaws.
Financial decisions impact long-term quality of life.
Self-sovereignty is crucial for financial independence.
Bitcoin empowers individuals against state control.
Political dynamics are shifting towards pro-Bitcoin candidates.
Bitcoin adoption could reshape societal structures.
Bitcoin represents the most asymmetric bet of all time.
The future of money may see Bitcoin as a medium of exchange.

💡 Sound Bites:

"Bitcoin is perfect money."
"Bitcoin solves all of this."
"Bitcoiners are so optimistic."

⏱️ Chapters:

00:00 – The Big Red Button: Understanding the Core Problem
03:00 – Joe's Journey: From Finance to Bitcoin Advocate
05:38 – The Impact of Money Printing on Society
08:29 – Recognising the Problem: The Path to Bitcoin
11:20 – The Zero Churn Rate: Bitcoin's Unique Adoption
14:21 – Inflation: The Consequences of the Big Red Button
17:10 – Deflation: The Natural State of the Economy
39:47 – The Impact of Inflation on Health and Society
41:55 – Housing Market Dynamics and Asset Inflation
50:12 – The Breakdown of Family Structures
55:23 – The Role of Bitcoin in Economic Stability
01:04:35 – Political Implications of Bitcoin Adoption
01:09:29 – The Human Element in Bitcoin Adoption
01:10:13 – Unlocking Global Free Markets with Bitcoin
01:11:47 – The Learning Curve of Bitcoin
01:13:05 – Understanding the Value of Bitcoin
01:14:54 – The Future of Real Estate and Bitcoin
01:16:55 – Intrinsic vs. Subjective Value in Bitcoin
01:18:28 – Proof of Work: The Value Behind Bitcoin
01:22:49 – Bitcoin vs. Gold: The Perfect Money
01:26:50 – The Asymmetrical Bet of Bitcoin
01:30:51 – Bitcoin as a Medium of Exchange
01:33:14 – The Future of Bitcoin and the Dollar

🔗 Featured Links:

Joe Bryan’s flagship video: What's The Problem?
Learn more: satsvsfiat.com

📌 About The Honest Money Show:

The Honest Money Show explores the forces shaping our financial world, from monetary expansion and policy to Bitcoin. The podcast features in-depth conversations with thought leaders, economists, innovators, and everyday people who challenge mainstream narratives and offer grounded, actionable insights. It’s built on the belief that understanding money is key to understanding power, freedom, and the future, and that financial literacy can empower people to take control of their lives.

🔔 Connect with Us:

Subscribe for weekly insights on economic truth and financial freedom.
Follow us on Instagram, TikTok, X, and LinkedIn: @HonestMoneyShow

Disclaimer:

This podcast is for general information and educational purposes only and is not financial, legal, or tax advice. The views of the host and guests are their own and do not represent any organisation or regulatory body. Cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, are highly speculative and volatile. You should seek independent professional advice before making any investment decisions. By listening, you accept that all decisions are your responsibility, and neither the host, guests, nor the podcast accept liability for any loss or damage.

#Bitcoin #Inflation #Deflation #EconomicStability #MoneyPrinting #HousingMarket #FamilyDynamics #FinancialEducation #MonetaryPolicy #EconomicCrisis #SelfSovereignty #PoliticalDynamics #FutureOfMoney #Cryptocurrency #FinancialFreedom

What is The Honest Money Show?

The Honest Money Show is your guide to understanding what money really is — and why today’s system isn’t working. Hosted by Anja Dragovic, this show cuts through the noise to explore how money shapes our lives, where it’s gone wrong, and what a better future could look like. Along the way, you'll discover how Bitcoin fits into the bigger picture — not as hype, but as a serious response to a broken system. Whether you're curious, skeptical, or already down the

Welcome to the

Honest Money Show.

Thanks to our

sponsor Batory

for making today's

episode possible.

Australia's

biggest Bitcoin

on the exchange.

Hi, Joe.

Welcome to the

Honest Money Show.

How are you?

Thank you

for having me.

Yeah, I'm very good.

Thank you.

It's a real pleasure.

Earlier on this year,

you released a video

that went viral, and,

It's such a pleasure

to have you on.

I really like

how you presented

the idea

that you've

put forward.

So for the listeners,

it is,

the video is called

What's the Problem?

And I guess

I want to start

with that.

So over to you, Joe.

Let's,

let's talk about this

problem.

Okay.

Well, I mean,

the problem is that

a big red

button exists,

and that big red

button allows

the people

that have access to it

to collect money

in a variety of ways.

And so it gives them

exorbitant privilege

in, in the

financial system over

and above

everybody else,

which is

fundamentally wrong.

And it's the existence

of the flick of this

big red button

that precipitates

all the issues

that we see around

ourselves today.

And so,

you know,

the social

deterioration,

you know, from

very explicit things

to much less explicit

things are all due to

are all just

downstream consequences

of the fact

that this big

red button exists

and is abused.

And if you

remove the

big red button

and you separate

money and state,

so that nobody

can print for free,

someone else

has to work for

and you resolve all

of these issues.

And so there is nothing

more important

than fixing the money.

If you fix the money,

you fix the world.

And the video is is

it's just a story.

It just to start

an accessible story

for everybody,

whether you're a child

or an old person with,

you know,

or whether you have any

financial experience

at all, doesn't matter.

You can watch it

because it's

just a story.

And humans

understand stories

and you understand,

after 30 minutes,

the importance

of having

an incorruptible money.

And what happens

when you don't?

And what happens

when you don't is

you end up with a world

like today.

And well,

when you do have

incorruptible money,

you have

human flourishing.

And that is

what we have

in our future.

Once we do

separate money

and stay

with the matter.

Humor

I would summarize it

like that.

And if you haven't

watched the video

already, please do.

Please do watch it

and then share it

with share it

with friends.

You will understand

after 30 minutes

why Bitcoin

is so important.

Yeah, absolutely.

And I've already

shared it

with so many family

and friends

and it just a light

goes off.

And that's all that

I can hope for.

If you can just spark

that curiosity enough

for them to continue

learning about it,

I feel the

I guess

half of

the work is done right.

What I love

in the video

that you've done, Joe,

is you've really

humanized the problem,

in a way, like you've

presented this

very heavy

topic

in a very human

and empathetic way.

But I want to

talk about

because you have

a background in, in,

in finance, like

you are

from a

traditional finance,

background.

And I'm curious

to know the backstory.

Is this problem

something that you

were always aware

of throughout

your studies

in your career? No.

No, it's it's,

I mean,

I studied physics

at university,

and then

then I, at 21 joined

Goldman Sachs,

and I was there

for five years

and then five years

at other

big investment banks.

But you tend

you tend

not to learn,

get taught

about money at school

for obvious reasons.

Yeah.

If somebody has access

to a big red button

and they constantly

abuse it,

it behooves them

to not educate

the population

that they have

a big red button

and they abuse it.

And so we are not

taught at

at school

or at university,

even even if you

studied economics

and I didn't

study economics,

even if you

studied economics,

you would get

taught inflation

is good,

inflation is good,

is Keynesian economics,

which is just

total nonsense,

absolute

total nonsense.

And so we have

a population

even in the

financial sector.

He was taught

the wrong thing,

actively taught

the wrong thing,

taught to not question

the fact that a big

red button exists,

and to

actually celebrate

that the big

red button exists,

because without it

we would be

impoverished,

which is 180 degrees.

Incorrect.

And so

when you go into

into finance,

when you have

a background

and not, you're either

starting with

no knowledge

or you're starting

with the

wrong knowledge,

and then

you go into the

financial sector

and you become very,

very specialized

very quickly

because you would join.

Well, for me,

I joined an equity

derivatives desk,

but there'd be

100 different desks

in an investment

bank with very niche

focus

on a particular

type of product

within the product

suite offered

by investment banks,

which is,

you know,

layers and layers down

from the money printer.

And so you, you

learn about your,

your particular area

and you become

an expert

in your

particular area,

but not not

not the big picture.

And no one's

really questioned

the big picture

because the banks

are the beneficiaries

of the big red button.

So,

you know,

it's like that.

It's like that

saying you can't

you can't

convince somebody.

You can't get someone

to understand something

their incentivized

not to understand.

Yeah, absolutely.

And this is why

the financial sector

was also pushed

back on Bitcoin for

or tried to undermine

the credibility

of bitcoin

over the last 15 years

until they

could actually

make money out of it.

And now they

can make money

out of it.

Now it's a

legitimate asset class.

Latest first listener.

And so,

you know,

even the whole time

I was at

the investment banks,

you were very aware

of quantitative easing

because I

went through the 2008

financial crisis there,

and the banks

only survived

because of the money

printing,

because of

the backing of

the governments

and the central banks.

So the only reason

the banking

sector survived.

And so the direct

beneficiaries of this,

because of the

framework

and because

the lack of,

consideration

or understanding

or awareness of

Austrian economics

and Bitcoin,

you just treat it

just it's just normal.

It's like,

you know, you're

fish, you're

fish in water.

You don't question

the water,

you don't question

what's outside

the fishbowl.

And so it was

only after

leaving finance

when I spent

ten years there.

And, and I left,

started a quantitative

hearing company with a,

with a colleague

focused on sports.

We write

algorithms and,

and mathematical

modeling sports

and then used

real time engineering.

Even going through

that process

as an entrepreneur,

it was much more

eye opening

because you're not

you're not

within the safety

net of the investment

bank. You're yeah.

You're thrown

right to the other end.

It's like

you've gone

from being

a direct beneficiary

of the money printing.

Yes.

Being the last person

to benefit

for the money fintech,

because there's no

there's no bailouts

for the

small businesses.

There's no bailouts

for the small business

owners.

It's like

they're on

the receiving end

of all the policies

from the

from the government.

And, you know,

a great example of that

is, you know,

during Covid,

you know,

small businesses

have to close.

The big businesses

can stay open.

You know,

there's this

there's not

a single set of rules

for everybody.

And when you're a,

you know,

an entrepreneur trying

to build a business,

you're taking risks,

you're

investing capital,

you're

trying to find product

market fit,

reach, profitability,

to find customers.

You're

doing all of this

by having to do

those things yourself.

And you

become much

more aware of,

the economic backdrop

and the risks

that you are

now subjected

to that

you weren't

subject to before.

Right,

because you're further

from the

money printing.

But even then,

you have to have

enough contact points

with Bitcoin for it

to sort of stick.

And you've

probably gone

through the same thing.

And it was it,

you know,

the first time

someone tells you

about Bitcoin

it's very rare.

You go

absolutely I get it.

Yeah.

You know

because you're

either dismissive.

You're starting

from the wrong place.

You're hearing it

from the wrong person

at the wrong time.

It's not quite

relevant for you.

Yeah absolutely.

The first time

I heard about

it was 2017,

and I just dismissed it

until last year.

But yeah,

most people do.

Most people do

because it's

so you either

don't recognize

there's a problem

that needs a solution.

So the solution

comes along

and you go, so what?

Right.

And

in my case,

I actually did so

it's so funny.

I remember this today.

I watched a documentary

from two from 1996

about this problem.

So this

this problem

is not a new problem.

They've been

people talking

about it for since,

since it commenced.

And and

many politicians

have warned against it.

Many economists

have warned against it.

But I never connected

the problem

to the solution.

And that is Bitcoin

being the solution.

Until

until just recently.

And I think that gap

still exists

for many people.

Oh yeah. Absolutely.

Absolutely does.

Absolutely does.

And

you know, I

suffer from

that as well

because you like

if Bitcoin

has all

these qualities,

you know,

unless you recognize

this is shortfall

in the

existing solution,

you don't recognize

the improvement.

And so it took 2 or 3

interactions.

But it was only in 2020

that Bitcoin really

hit home for me.

And since then

I've just been

learning more

and more about it,

spending more

and more time

on more of my

time on it.

But you reached

the point

that it

sounds like

you're right,

either

already through this,

through the event

horizon of this,

or very close to

it is up once

the penny drops

sufficiently,

you realize this.

Nothing else

is important.

This is the only thing

that matters.

Yes, the only thing I

fix is ever had.

I think once you.

Realize that,

you just don't go back.

It just.

And it's

like this moment.

It's like it's

one way door

to a new world.

I realize that

you've been able

to connect the dots

in such a way

that it's

become obvious.

It's become obvious

to critical thinking,

and it's not a belief.

It's not a,

it's not

something you're

going to change

your mind on

because it's

taken rigorous,

critical thinking

to get there.

And therefore your

realization is,

hang on a minute.

Everybody's

going to figure

this out.

And once

everything's a.

Matter of time.

It's a matter of time.

And then once

everyone figures

this out,

you know,

the world changes.

But not everyone

figures it out

in one go.

You know,

you've got 8

billion people.

And this is

this is an S-curve

of of adoption.

But it's not an S-curve

of adoption with churn.

It's not it's not like,

Facebook, for example.

I mean,

I'm not picking face.

I'm just it's

the first one

that came to mind.

You know,

they probably have.

I would imagine

I'll get these numbers

horribly wrong.

Half the world's

population

have a

Facebook account.

Maybe most of them

use it.

You know,

most of them have

created a Facebook

kind of

at some point

in the past,

used it for a bit

and then churned.

And now they don't

use Facebook.

No churn with Bitcoin.

Once you get Bitcoin,

you never go back.

It becomes

you're not just

a perpetual user,

a perpetual holder.

You actively

work to drive

the network.

Yeah,

because I just wasn't.

Thinking the world

until you that

you that

help accelerate

and you build

and what tends

to happen with bitcoin

and I realize we're

just jumping

straight

to the solution

here I do

we can come back.

But there

I'm the and

you've probably

seen this yourself.

The people who

find bitcoin

tend to be

the more

motivated people

the most in client

agency.

High agency people.

Absolutely.

And what do you get

when you have higher

agency people becoming

convinced

about something?

They make stuff happen.

They build businesses,

they educate others,

they drive

adoption forward.

And that's exactly the

segment of

the population

you would want

to initially

adopt something

which has a zero

churn rate,

which eventually

is going to

consume the world

because just

happens faster.

It's like it becomes

a self-fulfilling

outcome.

Yeah.

So yeah, I've got.

I just want to comment

that. Yeah.

Good. Oh, good.

I just

I just wanted to go

back on something

you said

to just create

clarity for listeners.

So when we say

there's zero churn

rate in Bitcoin,

we're not talking

about bitcoin the asset

or the token.

We're talking about

bitcoin the protocol.

So once you

you can buy

and sell Bitcoin

and or lose

money in Bitcoin

and never

come back to it.

But what are we talking

about here

specifically

is understanding

Bitcoin the protocol.

Yes. Yeah.

So it's the

it's having the penny

drop with Bitcoin.

You never met

anyone who

has been a bitcoin

and then decided that

all this bitcoins is

not for me.

It is.

It doesn't happen.

It doesn't happen.

If you knew it is.

It's a one way

it's a one way door.

And it takes just

a little bit of work

to get started

and it becomes

infectious.

It's a it's

a positive

infectious disease

risk okay.

But but

and so I like

like you said but the

but the

the the real problem

we have

is trying to get people

to understand

why it's important.

Because if

you understand

why it's important,

then you have

some motivation

to then go and do that

little bit of work

to start the

ball rolling.

But it's

like the same issue

that I had is,

you know,

you have this thing,

but you don't know

where it slots

into your worldview.

Like if I

if I bring this

new piece

of technology to you,

you think, like,

that sounds great.

Why it

why is it relevant?

Like if you

don't understand

the problem, you don't

you don't recognize

the solution.

And so the,

the, the

focus of the video

is literally just to

help everyone

understand

what's the problem

and do it in a,

in a way

that connects upfront

to us for everybody,

something that

impacts them

in their lives

because it impacts

everybody

in almost

every respect.

So

it's sort of connecting

the real outcomes

in your lives.

Back to the money

printing in a way,

which is

would be very hard

to do

the other way around.

It's very hard

to take

all of the

things we see

in our lives,

the deterioration

in all of

these different

aspects of society

and life in general,

and to reverse engineer

where those must

have come from.

That's a very

hard thing to do.

It's much easier

to run it the other way

around and say,

well, imagine

we had this

far off Ireland

and we started in

a certain place,

and then we made some

one key decision.

What does that mean?

What does that

that mean?

What does that mean?

And then you end up

with all these issues.

And then

and that is very clear.

Like we all just

came from them

when the big

red button, that's it.

You know,

and then you abstract

the entire

financial system away

just to

this big red book

that they can

just press,

because the system

is super complicated

and largely

inaccessible outside

of a small number of

people who have spent

the time

and the energy,

and typically have

a highly

academic background

so they can understand

the terminology

that deliberately

obfuscated terminology

used, etc.

try to understand

how the banking system

works.

It's not relevant

for most people.

The simple thing is

there's a big

red button.

They press it,

they print more money,

or they press it

and they change

the censorship

resistant nature

of the money.

So that's it.

Everyone can understand

that concept.

You don't

have to understand

what quantitative

easing actually is

and practice stuff

to understand

how the banking

system works.

Nothing abstract

that all away

big red button.

No one should have

a big red button. Easy.

Yeah.

And that's and that's.

Yeah, that's the video.

Start saving in Bitcoin

with BitTorrent

Australia's

biggest bitcoin

on the exchange.

Beta offers easy tools

and advanced features.

Join thousands

of happy users

making their

first Bitcoin

purchase today.

Download the app

or visit

beta Radio.com.

Today you.

Yeah.

Let's let's start

with something

like low

hanging fruit,

something that

everyone can relate to

and that is inflation.

So in Australia

we have a cost

of living crisis.

Inflation is one

of the issues

that we're dealing

with among many.

So what can you

what can you teach us

about inflation

and how that is related

to the big red button?

It's entirely due

to the big red button.

Inflation

is not because of

some foreign dictator

or greedy businessmen

or anything like that.

It's just not.

It's because

you print money

and we all,

we all know this

deep down, right?

We've all

it we've seen.

I mean,

certainly in the UK,

I assume it's

similar in Australia.

You get taught about

World War One,

World War two,

the causes

of World War two, and,

you know,

linking that back

to hyperinflation

in Germany

in World War one.

And there's

many other instances

of hyperinflation

everywhere else

since, including

recent ones

in South America

and continue

banks around the world.

But it's just

money printing.

So less

you print, more money,

it debase the currency.

All the prices go up.

Simple as that.

If you don't

print money,

the prices go down.

And so

what is

we've been conditioned

and gaslit by

Keynesian economics

and the central banks

to consider

that inflation

is a necessity.

And so

all the central banks

around the world to say

we need to state

we need to target,

2% inflation

every year.

They started

in New Zealand.

I'm sorry.

It started

in Asia, right.

New Zealand,

the island long

for far, far away.

Yeah.

But but but they

they all justify

the choice of 2%

because everyone else

chooses 2%.

That's it.

That's that's explain

why we need

2% inflation.

And the answer is well

everyone else uses

2% targets.

Well that's not a

that's not a reason.

That's not a reason

why we need it.

Just because you all do

it doesn't make it

the correct thing.

But there's

another aspect to it

there.

They get to

measure it as well.

And so they

get to target 2%

and decide

how to measure it.

And they change

how they measure it.

So, you know,

they'll tell you it's

targeting 2%,

but it'll

actually be 3%.

But you know, it's 10%

because you feel 10%

in the shops.

It feels 10%.

Because they

when the price of stuff

goes up,

they take it

out of the

calculation basket

and they replace it

with something cheap.

And the logic

would be, well,

because the price

went up too much.

People don't buy

chicken anymore.

They buy pork.

So we replace chicken

because the price has

gone up with pork,

which didn't go

up as much,

and therefore

inflation is lower.

It's like that's not

how it works guys.

That's not

how it works.

And so it the, the,

the fact that a

we need inflation

is incorrect.

Be the way that

they measure

and report

it's corrupted.

And so it mismatches

our expectations

for it.

But let's,

let's dig into

why we don't

need inflation.

And there and also

why inflation,

why inflation exists

because of

what they do.

And so the first thing

is to think about

a scenario

where nobody could

print money.

If nobody could

print money,

there is no way

to inflate

the monetary supply.

And so

what happens over time

is that prices go down.

And this is

this is very logical,

but entirely opposite

to everyone's life

experience today.

Prices go down

because of

human action,

because people

people try to become

more productive

over time.

They try to outcompete

each other

in a free market.

And so

there's an example

in the

in the video where I,

and I,

and I should say

this, this

the presentation

is built

on the shoulders

of all

the great work done

by all the Bitcoiners

around the world

over the last ten,

15 years.

To this.

There's a section here

where the islanders

are figuring out how

to live on the island.

And this is just

Jeff Booth's

price of tomorrow,

which I would encourage

everybody to read

in two minutes.

I mean, it's

it's a horrible

it's a horrible

compromise

and what he's written,

but it gets the key.

It gets the key,

components across.

And that's

when you have

a free market

with perfect money,

IP money,

people come in for free

prices go down

and quality goes up,

and that happens

forever.

And they have

the opposite.

We have the opposite.

We have prices going.

Up and quality

going down forever.

I need all that.

Well okay.

Well how

how have we gone from

what should be

obviously true

to something

to, to

what we see today

and perhaps

you just run

through why

this is obviously true.

If we have.

So I just give you the

same example

in the video.

You know,

you have people

washed up on an island

and a starting again

for the first

half of the day

is just trying

to survive

so that

everybody, individual

is trying to fight,

trying to

catch their own fish

for food.

They're trying to

cut down trees

for firewood

and build materials

and build their

own houses.

Super inefficient

because I'm terrible.

Fish in

it are terrible things.

But I'm all right.

Cook down trees, right?

But everybody is

is just scratching

a living, right?

Focusing on themselves.

But humans

being humans,

if they realize that

some people

are better at fishing,

some people are better

than trees

and some people

are better at building,

so they specialize.

So now they can produce

half them

twice the amount

and half the time

you increase

the amount of good

to be available

to everybody.

And now everyone

that has to

actively trade

with each other.

Because,

you know,

I only have wood,

I can't eat wood.

I need to sell them

with some fish.

And now you have

an active economy

where quantities

going up.

So prices begin to fall

and quality is going up

because we're

focusing on things

and we're better at it.

I could build,

I can create

better building

materials out of wood

than you could,

because I'm

specialized in it

and I get better at it.

Over time,

I improve my practices,

I become

more efficient,

I build better tools

so now I can increase

the quantity further,

or I can reduce

the cost of producing.

And so prices go

down, quality goes up.

And this is

just natural.

And and there's

lots of wood cutters,

lots of fishermen.

There's lots of people

building houses.

And so when you're

making a decision about

swapping

your production,

your productive output

for something else,

that decision is based

on a combination

of price and quality.

I want the highest

quality

at the lowest price.

So everyone's competing

on a combination

of the two,

which drives prices

lower on quality

higher.

This is like

basic stuff.

Like we all know

this to be true.

Like if we are up

on an island today,

this is exactly

what we.

Okay, so human action

in a free market

with perfect

money is prices

go down forever

and quality

goes up forever.

That's true.

So why the hell does

a world

not work like that?

And the world doesn't

work like that

because they

print money.

And so

if you think about

those interactions

on the island,

every interaction,

every economic

interaction

is a price signal

to everybody else.

So let's

say the

there were

two homebuilders.

I'm making it I'm

making this

making stuff now.

So imagine

there's two

homebuilders

and one of them

falls ill.

So the other one

says,

well I've got

no competition anymore

and I've put

my prices up.

And now everyone's

paying more

for the house.

That's a price signal

to the rest

of the market

that there is.

He's making

a greater level

of profitability

versus his inputs.

It's a signal

that someone else

on the island,

maybe someone else,

should become a home

builder

and go and compete

with this guy

that has

a price signal.

And so somebody stops

cutting down wood

and they go and focus

on house building.

They bring more

supply to the market.

They compete

with this guy.

They put his margins

under pressure.

They make him produce

more high

quality output.

This is free

market economics.

Right.

And so

in a free market,

the fact that people

trade with one another

and yet

the prices are visible

to people

is, is the signal

that drives

long term productivity.

Okay.

And then

compare that with

the ability

for somebody

to print extra money.

So now if we

think about

oh one more thing

I should say

is that

you should think about

the prices

falling over time

as society's

productivity accruing

to the money.

So the fact

of competition

and technological

innovation drives

all of the prices

for all of the products

and services lower.

The money

you have today

would buy more tomorrow

than it does today.

You would have

deflation

in an economy.

Yeah, right.

We're taught

that it's bad.

We're taught it.

But now

deflation is bad.

If you're leveraged

to the eyeballs,

which the

system is leveraged

to the eyeballs

because it's a debt

based system,

and that's the only way

it can survive

in a inflationary

Keynesian world.

Right.

So it's bad if you're

if you're indebted

hugely rich.

The world is

if you were thinking

about how the world

actually likes

the natural

state of wealth

is deflation.

And

the argument would be,

well, people wouldn't

spend money

in a deflationary

environment,

but we already know

that's totally not

total nonsense.

Because you have

a smartphone,

you have a TV,

you spend money

on credit cards.

All of these

things would be cheaper

if you waited a year.

You get

the same technology

for much lower price

in a year's time,

but you don't do it.

You don't wait a year

to buy a TV

or a smartphone

or a new laptop.

You don't.

The price appears

to be the same

in a year's time

because it's twice

as good

through

technological

innovation.

But if you bought

the same product

in a year's time,

it would be

50% cheaper.

So why don't you just

wait a year?

You don't

wait a year

because of the

utility value.

Because you want that,

because it

makes you more either

makes you happier

in some way

or it

makes you

more productive.

Yeah,

you could be

more productive

because you buy

a laptop

to allow you

to do work

and host podcasts

around the world

to unlock

more economic access

for yourself.

You spend money

on a credit card

and then you pay

20% annual

interest on it.

Why would you do that?

Just wait a month.

Spend it

in a month's time.

This is deflation.

You don't do it.

It's not a human,

it's a human.

What deflation

does is drive

higher quality

decision making.

Because for the

very first time, you're

in a situation where

you have the option

to retain your money,

because right now

you can't

retain your money

because it's melting.

It buys

less in years

time than it

does today.

So you feel

the constant pressure

to either spend

or speculate

to try and protect

that car of your money.

Whereas if you know,

in a year's time

the money's going to be

going to pay

at least

the same amount

and probably three

4% more

because

of the productivity

gains

occurring through

the free market,

because the prices

are falling,

then you start

to think, okay.

I mean, I'm

not in a position

to make better

quality decisions

around my spending

and around investment.

I'm not going to waste

my money frivolously

on stuff I don't

need today.

And and

think about

the quality of

the upgrading, decision

making quality

that brings

to a society.

And yes,

you would see a drop

in spending

if a society

went to a deflation

we want immediately,

but the drop

in spending

would be a good thing.

You wouldn't

be spending

money on stuff

that is unproductive

or unnecessary.

You funnel more capital

to the things

that is unproductive,

unnecessary,

which then compound

very, very quickly

because good decisions

allow more

good decisions,

a lot more

good decisions.

And very quickly

you end up

with an economy

that's far stronger

and far bigger

than one, which is

driven from inflation.

So deflation

is absolutely

the natural state

of the world.

It is

where we need

to return to

as humanity,

would very quickly put

the whole of the

economy on

a much stronger

footing very,

very quickly.

And I'll caveat that

with it's

extremely difficult

to get there

when you are leveraged

to the eyeballs,

like all

the governments

and companies, etc..

So it depends on

your starting point.

But if you're starting

from zero,

deflation

is that natural?

Is not shock.

And so you you were

wanting to understand

where inflation

comes from.

Then it's like

if this is the

natural state,

like how do we not

how do we not get

this productivity

accruing to the money?

One last point

I should say,

because the

productivity accrues

to the money,

you don't have to be

productive yourself

to benefit.

You know,

if you're also or young

and you are

not contributing

productively

to society, you

are still benefiting.

And this is what's

wonderful

about capitalism,

actual capitalism,

not what we live

in today.

Yeah, actual capitalism

is that

the productivity

accrues to the money,

right?

Everyone's

working in their

own self-interest

to the benefit

of everybody else.

And it's exactly

the same with Bitcoin.

Everybody is reacting

to price signals

in capitalism

and trying to make

good decisions,

which leads

to competition,

innovation,

technological

evolution,

driving prices

lower and raising

living standards

for everybody.

It's amazing.

This is just

people alone.

Leave people alone

and things

resolve themselves.

It's the interactions,

the interference

and the corruption

of the money

which makes everything

deteriorate.

And so,

you know, imagine

we go from the island

scenario now

and instead of

someone not being able

to print money,

someone is actually

able to print money.

And so they

have a big red button,

they press the

big red button

and they print

all money

for the government.

Now, when

the government

prints money,

it it belongs

to the government.

And I'm

using government

and central bank

interchangeably

because I

for most people

it doesn't matter

because that

the central banks

are independent,

but they're

not independent at all,

nominally.

So to try and give

some level

of credibility

around the fact

that they just abused

the money

on behalf of

the government, but

they can be received

the mandates

can be rescinded,

changed by

the government,

etc., whenever.

So they're

not independent.

But when you

print money

goes into the coffers

of the government,

and then

for that money

to enter the economy,

it has to go

from the government

to those people

connected

closely to

the government.

So typically

the banking sector,

but it could

be directorates,

you know,

pharmaceutical

companies, all

these sorts of things.

They are the

first recipients

of that freshly

printed money.

But if you go back

to thinking about that,

the price

signals

for the home builders,

if there's suddenly

an increase in demand

for the houses

and there's only

those two suppliers,

the prices

will start going up

and it'll be a signal

to other people

that again,

there is extra

profitability here.

I should become a home

builder too,

and compete

for this

extra profitability.

But there is demand.

If instead

the government

comes along

and it's

got freshly

printed money

and it spends it

with the companies

close to

the government,

it looks like demand.

But it's not demand,

it's just fresh money.

It's just extra money,

but it causes

the prices to go up

in those areas

connected to

the government,

which is a signal

to everybody else

in the

in the economy,

there's a demand

supply imbalance,

there's extra

profitability to

compete for.

And you

begin to suck in

active capital

and motivated

entrepreneurs

from other parts

of the economy

closer to

the government.

But they're only

being pulled

close to the government

because you printed

extra money.

It wasn't demand.

And so you're pulling

the most productive

people in society away

from other areas

of the economy

where they

were contributing

competition

to go and fight

for something

that's not real.

And so the prices

stop declining

in the other parts

of the economy

because there's

less competition,

there's less focus,

there's

less innovation.

And so if you

think about

what that means

for the deflation,

deflation

begins to slow.

You don't get the

rapid technology

increases that accrue

to the money.

You begin to undermine

the productivity gains

in the free market

that previously

were occurring

to the money.

And the more

you do this, you more

the undermine them.

So just by

printing money

you erode

the purchasing power.

Increase of the money.

Yeah.

Without even thinking

about

the negative impact

on top of that,

of all this extra money

washing around

in the economy.

Right.

So that's the

that's the first one

is the misallocation

of cattle.

The second is when

when those businesses

have received money

from the government

and they've made

profits,

they have to run

their business

using humans.

Material input costs,

interacting

with other businesses.

So they begin to spend

with other people

in the economy,

and those people spend

with other people.

And eventually

all this extra money

gradually washes

through the

whole economy.

But the net impact is

that it

starts to increase

the input costs

for everybody,

because there's more

there's more money,

not more demand.

There's just

more money.

And so when

the input costs go up,

whether it's human

or energy or raw

material inputs

for everyone,

every business

is reliant on those.

It doesn't matter

what business you are.

So if you

are thinking about

a previous state

where you had a price

for your service

or product

and the other

input cost,

and you made sufficient

profitability

given the competition

in the market,

that the profitability

justified you

being the entrepreneur

because

it's not riskless,

it's a lot of stress.

A hassle

doesn't suit everybody.

All right.

You're

employing people,

but you justify enough

and you make

as much profit

as you can

while delivering

the highest

quality service

at the lowest price

to to make the books

balance, giving

you competition,

as you talked

about in

the free market,

if your input costs

start to increase,

your profit margins

getting eroded.

So now you're left

with the choice, right?

You need that profit

margin to justify

running the business.

If you make

less profit,

you start to think,

well, I,

I can't justify

running this business

anymore.

I'll just close it

down.

I'll go and work

for someone else.

They can take the risk.

And if you do that,

you reduce competition

in the market

and prices

start going up

or they stop declining.

So

for every

business, you now

have to make

a decision.

It's like,

how do I reinstate

the previous profit

margin I had?

This is not me

being greedy.

This is just me

reacting to the fact

that the input costs

have gone up.

And so now

I have a choice.

I can either

if you think

about a product,

I can either

just pass on the prices

directly

to the customer.

So I keep the product

the same size,

same quality.

My input costs

have gone up,

so I just

raise the price

like very visible

inflation.

The alternative

is to say, well,

I don't want to

put the price up.

So I'll keep the same

quality of product,

the same price,

I'll just make

it 10% smaller.

I have,

which is Shrinkflation,

which we also say,

yeah, you know,

chocolate bars

constantly getting

smaller.

For example, for.

Us it's chips, chips,

bags like crisps.

I don't know

what you call.

Them or a

full. Of it.

All of that for that.

And this is the same

thing.

This is

this is

just shrinkflation.

So you've got

visible inflation

where the price goes

up, you've got semi

visible inflation

and it's semi visible

because sometimes

you don't notice

or you're tricked into

just thinking,

questioning

your own memories

about how big

it used to be.

Other currencies

because it's

a very gradual process.

But then third one

is to say well,

I don't want to make it

smaller

and I don't want to

increase the price.

What if

I could keep the

product the same size,

same price,

and I just compromise

on the inputs

to try and reduce them,

reduce

the cost of them again?

And the easiest

way to do

that is just

to fire people.

You just

find a way

to have fewer

humans involved

in producing.

So you fire them,

you increase

unemployment.

Fresh problem

for the government

to deal with

or you compromise

on the quality.

And so if you

think about a

physical product,

they'll start

to break sooner

because the

the components

they used to use,

they've replaced with,

lower

quality components.

And so it

looks the same.

But instead of lasting

two years it now

last one year

and you have

to rebuy it.

That's still inflation.

You're having to buy it

more frequently.

It still costs the same

but it's a

worse product.

And so this is

why we start

to feel like

everything

is deteriorating

around us.

Right.

And this is

hidden inflation

because

the price doesn't

look like it's changed.

It's not obvious

the products change,

but the quality has

been compromised.

And if you think about

other types

of products,

they're not

all mechanical

products like that

would incorporate

a food as well.

So now

you know

a food manufacturer

is trying to move

to ever lower quality

food.

Components,

the fresh ingredients

just replace it.

Increasing levels

of industrialized

sludge, the products,

the looks the same.

It's just unhealthy

for us.

Increasingly unhealthy.

And then we start

consuming things

we should never

be consuming.

About meat

in the supermarket.

Meat in

the supermarket here is

is like 87% pork.

Exactly. Yeah, exactly.

And this is

the deterioration

caused by the big

red button.

Then this causes

health crises.

Why do you think.

Why do I think

we have an obesity

crisis?

This only started

50 years ago.

Right

now, half the

population to this.

It's because we're

consuming stuff

we shouldn't

be consuming.

But it's because

of the money printer.

This is inflation.

So people think,

you know, inflation is

price is changing.

Inflation

is everything.

It's visible inflation

price is going up.

It's semi

visible inflation

through shrinkflation.

And there's

hidden inflation

where it's

quality deterioration

and negative outcomes

for the population

across

all range of things

but largely health.

And so that

that is inflation

right.

But it's all because

somebody printed

extra money.

That's it.

You do not get

those things

when somebody cannot

print money for free.

Yeah.

That's so heavy

because in Australia,

one of the one

of the problems

we have at the moment,

we have a massive

cost of living process.

And if you think

about Maslow's

hierarchy of needs,

the two

the two areas

that I hit

the most is housing

and food.

So, you know,

our supermarkets

are very much

being the scapegoats

of of this problem.

And people are blaming

big corporations.

That is

being big supermarkets,

not understanding

that there's

a much bigger

sort of problem

behind the scenes.

So yeah.

So yeah, we you

also I mean

this is not to

give everyone a pass.

You will always find

some people

who will try

and take advantage

of any situation.

Yeah.

That is not to say

all price increases

are only ever due

to the big red.

But some people

think, oh,

this is

a good opportunity

for me to jack

the prices up.

Okay.

To think otherwise

would be naive.

The fundamental driver

of all of this

is the corruption

of the money.

And you also talk about

housing. For

instance,

if a third

the third big

impact of inflation.

So the first is

the distortion

of the free market.

The second is

is inflation

in the cost of living

and the

negative impacts.

Then that brings to you

as humans

the the third is

is asset inflation.

And you guys know

the Australian House.

How does the market

spin off.

Yeah five feet.

We

we love our property.

Why is it the property.

It's I guess

it's the

Australian dream

to own your own home.

It's also

the way that

many people sort of.

And it was well,

there's a bias

with a lot of our

financial advisors

really liking property

as an asset class.

I'm not sure

where it came from,

but there's definitely

like the

Australian dream.

And it's also

an asset class

that's very well

understood.

It's done

very well in Australia.

So when it's done

well for other people,

other people

that are interested

in understanding it

and getting into it,

I don't

I don't know that

I can answer that

any better.

Well,

I get

the Australian treat

that makes sense.

Everyone should be able

to own their own home.

It's increasingly

difficult

because of the

second thing.

And the second

thing is,

I mean,

you talk about it

being sort of a

store of value.

Yeah.

That's that's what

I should have said.

Store value.

The house

was the store of value

very much is today the,

the yeah.

People want to store

their wealth

primarily in their home

and be set for life

and be able to retire

that.

But why

why do you have

to store

the wealth

in the house?

Because

the money's broken.

If you were

able to store

your value,

still store

your value

in the money,

you wouldn't

need to store it

in the house.

Like drop it.

Like if you could.

If you could go out,

do a day's work

and keep that money

and know

that tomorrow

is not going

to buy less

in ten years

time, it's

not going to be worth

30% of

what it is today.

If it

retained its value,

retained its

purchasing power,

you wouldn't

need to put it in

anything else,

because that's

your economic battery,

that the money

should be an accruing

economic battery.

I do a day's work today

that represents

one day

of my economic energy.

That's going to buy

3% more

tomorrow, 3%

more than that

in two years

time, etc., etc.

because the

the productivity

of the population

should be accruing

to the money.

And therefore

when I earn it,

it's adding

to my storage

and I can call on that

whenever I need to.

That's how I stole

my value,

is that we don't do

that.

We're not able

to do that

because someone's

printing it for free.

And, you know,

in a year's time

it's going to

be worthless.

You know, in ten years

time could be worth

a fraction

of what it is today.

So your

your question is like,

how do I protect it?

I buy a house,

I buy an extra house,

and I rent it out.

What you're doing

that is just trying

to get

a better store of value

for the money,

because

the money's broken.

You don't

you don't necessarily

go through that

explicit

thought process,

but that's

what you're doing.

That is what

you're doing,

whether you're

aware of it or not.

And why

this is the case is

that when they printing

extra money,

they're inflating

the monetary supply.

The costs of everything

are going up.

Your economic output,

which you get paid

for in Aussie dollars.

Someone else is

printing for free.

And so that

slice of the share

of the overall pie of

the economy

is declining.

There's somebody

present

printing their bit

for free.

Right.

So this

feeling

of productivity,

the stealing the

the purchasing power.

But by printing

this extra money,

it causes the prices

of everything to go up,

including the houses.

So if you think

about the

housing stock,

the housing stock

is not fixed

in supply like Bitcoin.

The housing stock is

absolutely elastic.

You can build

as many houses

as you want

given,

especially given the

space in Australia.

Lots.

Of space.

To play.

So we don't necessarily

have that everywhere.

But you're

not really constrained

from a,

space perspective.

You're constrained

from a population

perspective

and the

value of the houses.

So as houses are worth

more in money,

you increase

the supply of them

as home builders.

Yeah.

Because you

can even generate

a greater

a greater

profitability.

But by printing

more money

and you've got

a reasonable

from day one,

from one day

to the next,

the housing stock

doesn't really change.

It takes time

to build a house

as planning leases.

But if you just go

and print more money

and if you divide

the the money

by the number of houses

or houses

just worth more,

the houses have

become more valuable.

You just printed

more money. And so

when you compare

that with

just leaving your money

in the

in the bank account,

it's better

to buy a house

because at

then at least it's

the value of it

is sort of expanding

when measured

in the thing,

the extra stuff

they're printing

rather than fixed.

It's just a proxy

store of value

to try and protect

you against

the money printer.

And this is

why the house prices

are going up forever.

And it's just

printing more money.

And the longer

that goes on,

it becomes

you have the money

printer driving it,

but it also becomes,

driven by speculation

as well

and by leverage,

because the

banking sector

will offer

you loans

to buy the houses

because they

keep going up.

And so

you can go

and get a loan

for a second house,

but you get a loan

for the second house

helps you drive

the house.

Prices are faster,

right?

They become

a speculative

asset class,

not where you live.

Homes, a, just

utility tax. Yeah.

Sorry.

Oh that's good.

Hopefully.

Yes. It

they're

they're liabilities

not assets.

When you live somewhere

you pay property tax

you pay

there's maintenance.

There's all of these

different things.

Like sorry I gotta ask

I got to ask

what dog is it?

What breed of a dog?

It sounds like

a small dog.

I think

she's she's a toy.

A toy cockapoo.

Yeah.

She's she's she's tidy.

She's not.

He's very alert.

I'm sorry. I listen.

I could tell

by the bark

that it was

a small dog.

I have a miniature

schnauzer,

and he's very yappy.

A lovely,

very lovely breed.

Yeah. Sorry.

Sorry about that.

I forgot where we were.

I hope you don't.

No, no no, no.

So we were

talking about the

the house prices

going up.

Yes. Yeah.

And so the house price,

the housing sector

becomes speculative.

And this is why

you see on Australian

TV all there I,

I'm, I'm

making

an assumption here

I, I'm assuming it's

the same as the UK.

We have

you know

lots of property shows

and buy

to let portfolios

and rebuilding

our house and all.

Of this stuff,

reality shows, home

maintenance

and improvement.

It's all over

Australia.

Because you're

buying them.

This is store value.

You then realize

you may not even

realize why,

but buying

being more leverage

to the housing

market

is a better thing.

Because if I borrow

money cheaper

than the rate

at which

they're printing it,

I can buy more

houses, benefit

from the

monetary debasement,

and repay the loans.

But you're just driving

the underlying cause,

which is,

the direct result

of the money printing.

But that hurts your

everyday family

because your

everyday family,

as you said,

is suffering

from the cost

of living crisis.

They're getting

squeezed

by visible,

semi visible

and hidden inflation.

Their health

is being undermined

at the same time

as they're

they're trying to

buy a house.

But now the houses

are more expensive

when measured

in their

daily earnings,

because they're

also driven

by speculation

that the

money printing.

So I'm

struggling to afford

my day to day living.

I know it's

more expensive

to buy a house,

so I can't buy

a house anymore

unless

my wife also works.

If we both work,

then we can afford

to live

and afford a house

while taking on

a load of debt.

But if we both work,

we don't have

time for children.

There's more

stresses in our life

and we start to see

the breakdown

of the nuclear family.

We can't make

the economics

work anymore

to have children

or have as

many children

as we wanted

to be able to live

and keep the roof

over your head.

And so you have

fewer children

and you have

more family breakdowns.

There's just more

stresses, like

you're undermining

the,

the nuclear family

through the money

printer.

And this is all

this is all engineers.

This is like

the system is corrupted

because it's the

money printer

and it's

it's everywhere.

And you can see it.

It's just it's it's

absolutely everywhere.

But then it has second

it has knock

on impacts.

So when you

have fewer children

and this is why you see

declining birth

rates everywhere

in the West,

right?

It's because

women have been told.

Right.

The most important

thing is

to have a career

go out,

you know, be

independent, strong.

It's like family

is the most

important thing.

Family and dogs.

I think we may

have to cut this,

cut this vet out,

but here he is.

I'm sorry.

I like this bit.

Yeah. Like,

If family's most

important thing,

family is.

And

but but the whole

the last 50 years

has been about

driving women

into the workforce

to ensure they can keep

the money

printer on the road,

to ensure

that they can keep

the benefit

of the access

to the money printer

because they need to

increase the tax base.

So it doesn't look

like they're just

printing money

for free,

which is exactly

what they're doing.

Yeah. And then

because you have

declining birth

rates everywhere,

the pension system

doesn't work.

The pension system is

absolutely insolvent

everywhere.

And so

the way the pensions

typically work

and I can't speak

to Australia,

but how they would work

in the UK

is that

there's no

sense of an

investment vehicle

or something like that

from the government

is that

you pay in

and someone else

gets the money,

the retiree gets you

money,

you're not paying

into a central thing

that's invested

and it accrues over

time.

It's like

money earned money out.

But the pension system

and the promises

made associated

with that to the amount

when you get to retire

and the

the quality of life

you will have

when you retire.

Those promises

were made

a long time ago,

but the demographic

shifts means

you still

have people

coming through,

but there's not enough

young people

to support

the older people.

The older people

are living longer.

The younger people

are increasingly

unhealthy,

struggling to own

any assets,

underpaid,

less engaged

with society,

just overworked.

The system is broken,

right?

There is no way

to balance

the promises

you've made

with the inputs

coming through with

the demographics.

And so what happens

is it goes bust,

it goes bust.

Unless you continue

to push back

the retirement age

and you continue

to undermine

the quality,

the real value

of what

you pay in retirement.

So it doesn't

work anymore.

So the people working

now will never

get to retire,

because it won't exist,

because it can't exist.

And so

you have all of these,

secondary

and tertiary impacts.

But if you

think about also

the people who

the people

who aren't

in a position

to buy a house.

So either they're

poorer and can

and can't,

won't be able

to get their deposit

together, can't

get access to,

leverage, etc.

or they're

just younger,

not ready

to buy a house.

They increasingly

disengage

because they see

the house prices

going up.

They see the cost

of living pressure.

And you think,

I'm never

going to be able

to buy a house?

Yeah,

I've heard some stats

in in Australia

recently that it takes

ten years

and two months

at this point in

time to save

up for a deposit,

which is a very

long time,

and that the average

first home

buyer now is 50.

I need to validate

this and verify

that I'm not just

making things up,

but it

it sounds accurate.

Yeah,

but is that normal?

Absolutely not.

Because what

you tend to do

is you buy

a house first,

then you have children.

So if you

make it harder

to buy a house

and settle down,

you push back

the ability

for people

to have children.

And so you just

exacerbate everything.

Again.

And if you come

to the conclusion,

I'm never going

to be able

to buy a house,

what does that mean

for you?

Decision making wise?

It's like, okay, well,

there's no

point saving.

So I'll just start

going on holiday.

I'll live my best life.

I'll yellow.

Build up, right? Yeah.

If you don't plan

for the long term,

you don't sacrifice.

You put off

getting married.

Part of

having children.

You think

about your quality

of decision

making of

spend

that we're

talking about

before it deteriorates,

because you're

not investing

future productivity

investing and you're

enjoying yourself.

Yeah.

And then if you're

struggling

even further, what you

it is struggling

to survive

and everything's

getting more expensive.

Your wages are lagging

behind.

You cannot save at all.

You're living paycheck

to paycheck.

You're probably living

in debt.

There's no way out.

And so you start

making bad decisions.

It's like

alcoholism or

drug abuse or whatever.

And then you have

a mental health crisis

for everybody.

It's all

because of the money

printer.

It's all the

direct result

of the money printing,

and it's

destroying society.

But yeah, and this is

and this is,

this is how everything

is just

and all the issues

we see analyze

because of the big

red button ecosystem.

You take that away.

Root cause.

The root cause,

if you take that away,

these things

all resolve themselves.

And this is why

I like Bitcoin.

I say

if you fix the money,

you fix the world

because you

absolutely do.

Because the

the world is broken,

because the money is.

But it's really not

obvious.

It's really,

really not obvious.

But when we talk it

through like this,

it should be entirely

logical.

And, you know,

people should be

hopefully listening,

go, well,

yeah, of course.

But unless.

You know.

That you can show

unless you can

show someone the map,

they don't know how to

go from A to B,

but once you know

how to go from A to B,

you don't

forget it again.

It's like you see it,

you see it once,

you remember

it forever.

And this is why,

you know, once,

once P once

the penny drops

a Bitcoin

is it

changes everything.

So the first time

you go from thinking

the world

is deteriorating,

I don't understand why.

I don't understand

how I protect myself,

my family,

the people I care about

to a position of yeah,

the world

is deteriorating.

I know exactly why,

and I absolutely can't

protect myself,

my family and the

people I care about.

And that protection

is Bitcoin.

Yeah.

Well let's talk

about bitcoin.

Yeah.

And the conflict

between

the comprehensive

for free.

And the can't sensory

can't censor it

in any way.

So even even the money

you have like

because

everything we've

talked about

there is about

quantity of money.

It's not about

the other aspects

of aspects of money.

And you guys will know

this as well.

Is it.

We feel it in the UK

increasingly over

the West.

The money you keep in

the bank

is absolutely not

yours. It's not.

To get permission.

And you get permission.

To access it.

And if you're lucky.

Yeah, yeah,

you, you,

you want to

do something,

you have to

convince them

they should

let you do it,

which is bonkers.

Absolutely bonkers.

You're working

for something

someone else can

print for free,

and someone

can stop using

whenever they want.

How's that logical?

Yeah,

it seems like

an extreme

case, because, I mean,

across the

whole population,

it hasn't happened

entirely across

the board,

but we have had

many instances

of the banking

of just normal,

everyday citizens.

We're not able

to withdraw cash

without being asked

all sorts of questions.

So, yeah.

And then,

yeah.

If you just.

It's a matter of time.

Yeah.

You don't have

to be to back

suffer from it.

Just try my online

transaction.

Just try and go

into the bank and say,

can I withdraw

all my money?

And they'll say, no,

okay.

Or what's it for?

It doesn't matter

what it's for.

It's my money.

And the reality is

it's your money.

If the government

says it's okay

and the bank

says it's okay

if you require

someone else's

permission,

you are not wealthy.

You're

you have to be

self sovereign.

And Bitcoin is

perfect money.

They can't print it

for free

and they can't censor

you. Hold it yourself.

You don't even need

to keep it in the bank.

The fact that we keep

money in the bank

is as a

result of the money

being imperfect.

It's not the way

it should be.

Perfect money is paper.

Money is something

you should just

hold yourself.

Why would you?

You need to give

someone else

your money.

That doesn't make

any sense.

Yeah, it's money, but.

Oh yeah,

I remember

Andras

Antonopoulos said

very early on

that there's

we don't even have

an instance

in this world

where you can pay

someone, anyone

in the world

or locally

without going through

a third party,

without going

through a company.

So there's

no more like,

I can't,

you know,

we go out to

a restaurant,

have dinner,

split the bill.

I want to send

you money.

It has to go

through a company

you just seem so like.

And we've accepted it

as as something normal.

We've been

disintermediated from

the money,

and it's been a

deliberate action.

And this is why

there's a war on cash.

There's a war on cash.

Because they can't

disintermediate cash.

I can give you

some Aussie dollars

and no one's

taking the fee out

the middle.

No one is censoring it.

No one is protecting me

or protecting you.

But they come by.

We make a digital.

They have to

pass through

third party.

And therefore you have

total surveillance,

you have total control,

and you get to charge

everybody

for everything.

And that's

how you subjugate

the population.

This is just

about control,

control

and stealing

as much money

as possible

through a combination

of inflation

and centralization.

Yeah.

For phase

it Bitcoin solves

all of this.

Bitcoin solves

all of it.

Not only does it just

does it fix the world

right.

It empowers everybody.

It removes

it removes

the state's ability

to control your life.

It defunds the state

because the state

cannot take

the money from you

because they

never had it

in the first place.

You own the money

yourself.

No one can stop

you sending

or receiving it

to anybody,

anywhere in the world

at any time,

at the speed of light.

No one can even prove

you have it,

and they absolutely

cannot take it off

you unless you choose

to give it to them.

So it massively reduces

the power of the state.

And so,

you know,

we are in a creeping,

we're creeping towards

total dystopia

around the world,

actually in the West,

with ever

bigger governments,

ever greater level of

interference,

etc., etc..

Now this is,

this is the cause.

They can control

the money

because they can

take the money

whenever they want.

If you remove

the ability

for them to do that.

All right.

Sorry.

She's she's reacting

to the conversation.

She's an impressive

ultimate that you like.

And if you

remove that ability

to do that

then they have

to start acting

in the interest

of the population.

And this is

this is what is.

So this is

why I think

Bitcoin is

as a segment,

so optimistic

because they feel like

they have a greater

level of control

in their lives

for the first time.

They have

a bright future

ahead of them

because they can see

what everyone else

is going

to figure out

over time.

And they also know

that once everyone else

figures it out,

the problems

resolve themselves

because, yeah. This is.

Because, well,

what happens is

Bitcoin is start

turning elections.

And you see this

in the States.

And so Trump came out

and he was explicitly

pro crypto.

This is a much

broader base.

But he was explicitly

separating Bitcoin

from crypto

and create

a Bitcoin

strategic reserve.

And saying

that he wants

the US to be

the number

one superpower

when it comes

to Bitcoin.

Whereas the Democrats

were fighting it.

Okay.

And anti crypto

army were trying

to kill

all the

bitcoin businesses

through shadow

banking, interference

regulation.

The SEC has been

has been trying

to create

just difficulties for

bitcoin companies

through time

enforced and through

regulation

through enforcement,

not communication.

And so

what happens is

Trump wins

all the votes.

He wins all the votes.

Democrats win

no votes from Bitcoin

because the most

important thing

is fixing the money.

So Bitcoin has

become one issue.

Voters

I'm sorry I.

That's all right

I'm sorry.

We're gonna have to

fuck this down.

Give me one second.

Yeah, yeah, sure.

No problem at all.

And, yeah, I'm.

I'm sorry.

I'm sorry about that.

I mean, no, no.

Not at all.

I don't know,

I don't know

what's gotten into

normal.

She's fast asleep,

up till

about lunchtime.

I think she's

getting triggered

by the conversation.

I have tried

talking about

the problem,

and she's like.

She's just wanting

to give

the sound effect

that she's, you know,

very supportive

of of this.

I'm sorry.

I hope it hasn't.

Ruined the ruin

the podcast for you.

Hopefully not. At all.

I did edit that out.

And so we're

talking about the,

so we're talking about

the votes.

So I guess we can.

Restart it,

restart it here.

And so

the Democrats win

no votes

because no one is a

single issue voter

against Bitcoin,

but almost

every Bitcoin

or is a single issue

voter for Bitcoin.

So the path

to the candidate

who is pro Bitcoin

wins all the votes.

And so there's no point

fighting bitcoin.

It becomes table stakes

in the next elections

around the world.

You've got to be

pro bitcoin.

Or if you lose votes

politicians don't like

not winning elections.

So they'll be

pro bitcoin.

This is just

what's going to happen.

And the more bitcoin

you have,

the bigger

that block of votes

that you're winning.

And it means

the candidates

have to be pro bitcoin

more explicitly

pro Bitcoin.

You even get candidates

who are bitcoin less.

And once you are

a bitcoin

I've never

met a candidate.

I've never met

a bitcoin a

who thinks a

bigger government

is a good idea, right?

It's about

less government.

It's about

more sovereignty.

And so eventually

everyone's going

to be a Bitcoin

way before

everyone's a bitcoin.

Bitcoin is are

going to represent

a sufficiently large

but still small block

of the

voting population

that it changes

candidates behavior.

And we're

going to start

having Bitcoin

is in politics.

So government

starts to fall.

You run on a smaller

government ticket

and you

gradually remove

the interference

of the state

because they realize

you can't buy Bitcoin.

And they realize

the logical thing

is to embrace Bitcoin

because it gives you

a competitive

advantage.

This is what's

going to happen

to every country

in the world.

And so as big

as Bitcoin is,

you can be

massively optimistic

about the future

because you know

you know

we're going to win

this resolves

this result.

This resolves itself.

There is

it's a question

of how long it takes

and the planet

takes between now

and there.

But we know where

it's going.

We know that's the.

Path that I'm always

speculating on.

So I do

speculate on Bitcoin,

just not the way

that people,

the traders

would think.

I speculate on Bitcoin.

It's more about

what's that path

going to look like,

what countries

are going

to be friendly

towards it versus

not friendly

towards it.

Will it be

civil unrest?

Are we going to

have an evolution

or a revolution soon?

These are all thoughts

that keep me

up at night.

Yeah, and I don't

I don't have

the answer.

That I'm.

Used to them

all because it's

it's less

about logic and

it's more about

human emotion

as those

things play out.

But I think

game theory wins.

Human action wins.

People tend

to do things

that are

in their interest

to do.

You learn lessons

from other people.

If you fight back,

you lose.

Yeah, stop.

And if you

ignore Bitcoin,

you get left behind.

For this.

There isn't

a neutral strategy.

Yeah.

It's like

it's like goes out to

on the internet.

It's like

you can choose

to ignore those things.

But if you do

you either end up dead

or out competed.

So you don't

ignore them.

You you

engage with them.

And this is the same

as is

what's going to happen

to Bitcoin

over the next

decades

as it washes

around the world

and washes

washes society clean,

I would say.

I want to ask you, Joe,

do you think

because sometimes

I'm trying to

think of

questions to ask like

I see this solution

very clearly.

I see the problem

very clearly.

But someone who is

entirely new to this,

I think they might

be thinking like,

are we too idealistic?

I would,

I encourage you

to watch the video

because I don't think

there'll be

anything in the video

they disagree with.

And if you can

watch that video

and you agree

with every step of it

and you use

your own critical

thinking

at the end

of the video,

you will know

that you don't want

to be on

one side of the aisle,

but that one

side of the island

is so much better

than reality.

Better

than where we are

currently.

You already know

you don't want to be

on that side

of the island,

but that was

better than we are

where we are today.

I am convinced

you've got there

on your own.

This is all just

critical thinking.

It's all it is.

Do you know is

Bitcoin is if

we always say

don't trust, verify and

with Bitcoin

you're just encouraged.

Everyone encourages you

to not trust anybody

and to deliver

to do your

own thinking.

And at the core of this

is it's all just

natural human action.

Think about what

you would do

in those scenarios.

Well, that's

kind of special.

Give me hope.

Yeah, well,

it gives me hope

about the adoption

because I do

worry about,

you know, Australia

and how that's going

to unfold here.

And whether, you know,

people will be open to

whether governments

will be friendly.

But I do

ultimately believe

that most people

are inherently good,

and most people want

what's best

for themselves

and everyone else.

And that,

I guess truth

will prevail.

Well, incentives

prevail.

Yeah.

Human action

will take hold.

And when I'm

with Bitcoin,

you unlock a global

free market

because no one could

stop your trading

with anybody.

No one can even

no one even has to know

you've traded

with somebody else.

There has to be

anybody in between.

And in exactly

the same ways.

Capitalism is

everybody working

free market capitalism,

not the distortions

we have today

where you have more

and more government

interference,

introducing regulations

and disruptions

to the free market.

But free market

capitalism is

everyone just working

in their

own self-interest,

which ultimately

benefits everybody else

because the product is

your cruise

to the money.

Okay,

Bitcoin is exactly

the same.

The entire

Bitcoin network

is everyone

just working

in their

own self-interest,

but it benefits

everybody else

because it

makes Bitcoin

more secure,

more accepted,

more trusted by people

through the passage

of time, etc., etc.

you can't beat up.

You can't beat a system

either.

You fight it,

but you'll lose.

The right thing to do

is to engage with it

and make it a

competitive advantage.

Fear

and understand it.

Yeah, absolutely.

And by doing that,

you strengthen

the network.

You strengthen

and help it win faster.

And so it wins

this.

Then it's it's

not it's not in doubt.

It's just how long

it's going to take.

Yeah.

People

people may

struggle with

the cause.

It's technology.

You have an adoption

period.

It's like it's

like it might seem

clunky or hard to use

or of a

high, steep learning

curve, these

different things.

But that's no different

for the internet.

30 years ago,

you wouldn't know them

say that of

the internet.

Now,

you know,

it's really difficult

to get online.

You know, it's

not it's super easy.

It

you live your

lives online.

It is shopping online.

I do banking online.

It's easy.

It's frictionless.

That was not the case.

There is

think about Bitcoin

exactly the same way.

There is time.

Going to be super easy

even in the world.

Yeah you it

it's just your early.

You're early

and you're

dealing with those

early fractions

for those early

fractions are

what represents

the opportunity.

Once you one

penny is dropped

and you know

everyone else

is going to get it

once.

That was going to be

my next question

for you

is any listeners

that don't yet own

any Bitcoin

or don't understand

much about it

other than, you know,

listening,

watching with

your video,

do you think

they've missed

the boat?

No, no.

But let me ask

you this.

Are they going to

stop printing money?

No.

Never.

Ever.

So the

Aussie dollar

is going to zero.

So are you.

Well, I late know

early.

Yeah. Early.

Absolutely.

Because the dollar

the Aussie dollar is

is not worth zero yet.

It's going to

be worth zero

because they'll

never stop printing

the purchasing

power of you

dollars

is going to zero.

And you know this

because you don't

keep money in the bank

because it's melting.

You know,

everyone

already knows this.

Everyone knows

you don't keep money

in the bank

for ten years.

You definitely don't

keep money in the bank

for 50 years.

Won't be

worth anything.

I thought you were

singling me out.

Like I don't

keep money.

In the bank.

You know, this?

Yeah. Sorry, sorry.

Are you trying.

To $5 range attack me?

Joe?

Yeah, but all.

Reactivity

that's come across.

I think it's.

No, no, no, it's

funny tone.

I meant,

I meant in general

people.

This is not new.

People know.

People know.

This is why

they buy the house.

Yeah.

Because the money

is broken.

And so

if the

if the

money's broke now

they're just

going to continue

to print money.

It's more of the same

until it's

not worth anything.

And so sometimes

sometimes people

ask me for

and I don't talk

about price

predictions.

But sometimes

people say, well,

what's your price

prediction?

I say,

the only thing I say,

but I wouldn't normally

say the Aussie dollar.

I'd say something else.

But yeah, my price

prediction is

Aussie dollars

going to zero?

I so you don't

want to own it.

You want to own the

thing they can't print,

and now

no one can take off

you and stop

you sending.

And then everyone

in the world

is going to accept

what they

and it's going to be

the money.

It's going to be

the money of the world.

Why would I want to

own anything else?

Why would I want

to own a house?

Why would I want to own

a second house

that goes down

when measured in debt?

Right.

So so think about

think about

the decision

making for

the Australian people

where they've gone

from realizing

they can't keep money,

can't keep

the purchasing

power of the money.

So they buy the houses,

the housing market

gets inflated

and the houses

represent more

than their core

utility value to

to the family.

Now,

when you're thinking

about your

portfolio of houses,

you think,

oh, well, that's

going up in value

because it's worth

more Aussie dollars

every year.

I think

that's a good

investment.

If you measured it

in Bitcoin,

it's losing money.

It's going down

in value every year.

And so as soon

as your unit

of internal

unit of account

switches to Bitcoin,

you realize

the housing

is terrible investment.

Why on.

Earth might. Why.

Why on earth

would I be

buying houses

that lose money

over time?

I'll buy a loan.

The house I live in

because it has utility

value for me,

but I'm selling

the rest of them.

I'm selling them.

I'm keep it in bitcoin

because if

I don't do that,

I'm losing bitcoin.

I'm losing money.

And so what happens is

you demonetize all the

proxies for the value

that have taken

the place

of the money

over the last 50 years,

and Bitcoin

just consumes

everything.

It Demonetize

is all of these

all of these

asset classes,

because

the asset classes

have been purchased,

not because of

their intrinsic,

not because

intrinsic is

not the right word,

not because

of their utility value,

that because

they're being used

as a

better store of value,

because the money

is broken.

So if you fix money,

do you monetize

all these things?

This is like natural,

logical outcomes.

I've just fixing

the money.

Yeah.

Now that you've

said intrinsic,

I have to ask you,

Joe, can you

I just have to

I think this is

a lot of people

get hung up with this.

Bitcoin has no

intrinsic value.

Okay.

Well I would go back to

I thought

you were gonna

ask a

different question. No.

Oh really?

What you going to say?

You did.

You do

I think you can say

is there such thing

as intrinsic value?

Well, I have

an opinion on that.

But.

Okay.

Well, yeah, I'm

just saying, if.

I believe in

subjective value,

I don't believe in

intrinsic value,

but yeah. 100%.

And I'm not

so obviously true.

If you're drowning,

do you want a gold bar

or a life jacket?

Life jacket.

So how is the range

and how is there

any such thing

as intrinsic value.

There's not.

It has utility.

But there's

no such thing

as intrinsic value.

Full stop.

A single example proves

that's the case.

Okay.

It's about

what you want

at a given time.

Given

the circumstances.

It's entirely

subjective.

So to say

Bitcoin doesn't

have intrinsic value,

nothing has

nothing at all

has intrinsic value.

Okay.

What Bitcoin does have

is it

has proof of work.

So when you have she.

Loves proof of work.

I will cut this bit

back in and go.

Okay okay.

I didn't.

Right.

Sorry I have

to start again.

So I said Bitcoin

as proof of work.

Money printing

does not have

proof of work.

You can press a key

on a keyboard

and create more money.

Nothing goes into that

with bitcoin.

You cannot

print it for free.

And this is one of the

this is one of

the issues

that people have

is like

why is

Bitcoin valuable?

And I would

get into question why

I think gold

is valuable.

No one seems

to question

that gold is valuable.

But why is gold

gold valuable?

Because it

has a

series of qualities

that make it

an acceptable money.

Historically

the best, approximate,

the best, the best

evolution of money

that we've had

available to us

on Earth.

However,

it's compromised.

It's not portable.

We can't send it over

the internet.

It's hard to verify.

I can't pay for

small amounts in it

because how do you pay?

How do you keep

changing gold?

How do you even pay

for it?

A bag of chips

and gold.

You couldn't do. That.

Can't digitalize it.

You can't carry it

in your pocket.

So?

So clearly it fails on

so many different

measures.

It's not good money,

it's just the best

money we had

because it's not good

money.

Had a paper layer

put over the top of it

until you put

all the gold

in the gold vaults

need issue receipts

against the gold.

And then you say

you can come

and swap the receipt

for the gold

whenever you want,

but no one ever did,

because no

one wants the gold

because it's clunky and

impractical.

So you just end

it with fiat money.

And then over time,

they realize

they could just

print more

of that money

because no one ever

asked for the gold.

And then when someone

calls their bluff,

they just severed

the convertibility.

And now we just use

not only money.

That's the history

of the

financial sector,

the history of

the monetary

sector of the last

since 1971.

Like the severed

that link in 71.

That's why

we use paper.

So it's called

because gold,

imperfect money,

bitcoins, perfect money

because paper money.

And so you can

send it over

the internet,

you can hold it

yourself.

It's infinitely

divisible.

It lasts forever.

You know,

you don't need

you don't need,

you don't need the,

PayPal.

It is the paper layer.

It's the paper

layer in the money.

It's everything.

There's

no separation anymore

between currency

and money.

Paper is the currency.

Gold is the money.

Bitcoin is one

and the same thing.

It solves.

It's perfect money.

It's the perfection

of money.

So you don't

need anything else.

You don't need

anything else at all.

And so when.

I ask.

I'm so sorry.

It's okay

to come back

to the answer

in the question.

Like so.

If you have

convinced yourself

that gold is valuable,

then you're going

to love Bitcoin

because gold

is valuable,

because it feels

those characteristics

of a money

good enough

or better than anything

else. Right?

But still imperfect.

But one of the core

characteristics is,

you can't print it,

you can't print gold,

you can't

print it for free.

You've got to go

and decide to mine.

You've got to do

some work.

You've got to

do proof of work

to bring gold

into circulation.

You've got to

go in mining,

you've got to expend

energy, you've got

to expend resources

to go and

get gold

out of the ground,

and you'll make

a small profit

margin on doing so.

But similarly,

if it was,

if the cost of

getting gold out

the ground was

really low,

more people

would compete

to do so, right?

And then you would have

the erosion

of the profit margin,

like any other

thing in society.

But also as the

gold price goes up,

you could

dig more out

of the ground.

So it's a hard

it's was

like a hard money,

but it has soft edges.

It's in a supply

because basically

all the money

or the gold

already exists.

It's just

an economical

to excavate it

unless

the price goes up

and as the price

goes up,

the supply goes up.

But but

the whole construct

there is you're

expanding energy,

doing proof of work

to bring

gold into existence

above the surface.

And that's along with

its characteristics is

what gives gold value.

Right.

And this is people

probably listening

gold obviously.

Obviously

that's the case. Okay.

Well great.

Bitcoin is exactly

the same apart

from it's better.

So you're mining

Bitcoin.

There's a fixed

amount of Bitcoin

that will ever exist.

And that gold right.

There's an unknown

amount of gold

in the planet.

And the gold

is absolutely infinite.

The universe.

It's just that

we can't reach it.

Bitcoin is

absolutely finite.

Will ever be

will forever be finite.

And

you can't mine

more of it

as the price goes up.

And so it's

absolutely scarce.

It's absolutely hard.

It's totally inelastic.

And so

there's there's

nothing like that

in the entire universe,

but it's secured

by energy.

So instead of,

you know, digging

massive holes

in the ground,

expanding huge

amounts of energy,

destroying the planet,

getting all

the gold out,

you're using,

mining infrastructure,

electronic mining

infrastructure.

It's just electronic.

It's just

electrical energy.

That's all it is.

And you're

just getting

a random number.

It's 100%

efficient energy money.

You're not destroying

the planet.

You're

saving the planet

through Bitcoin mining

because Bitcoin mining

incentivizes

renewable energies

infrastructure

globally,

lowering the cost

of energy

for everybody,

stabilizing

grids,

bringing economic

empowerment to

to company

to communities

all around the world

that wouldn't

be able to monetize

this stranded,

stranded

energy resources

they have access to

Bitcoin fixes

everything,

including

the environment

and

and that should

be very clear

why that has value.

And the more people

that miner,

the more people

that compete for it.

Free market process,

not like gold mining.

You don't get

the rights to mine it.

If you know

the politicians,

you don't get to

with the rights.

It's free

for everybody,

everywhere in the world

to compete

to mine Bitcoin.

You just got

to try and do it

on the most economical

basis possible.

So you want computers

and the lowest

cost energy,

which is the energy

that already exists.

This is why

you get to build out

the renewables grid.

Because if a river

is flowing

the energy exists.

It's just not

being monetized.

So build

the infrastructure

to monetize it.

You have green energy

and so

yeah Bitcoin

absolutely has value.

And the more people

that mine it,

the more secure

the network,

the more decentralized

the network is

around the world.

So no one country

controls it.

No one country

can impact

it materially

to any degree.

The amount of

total power

used to mine

Bitcoin is in excess

of any combination

of nation states

could possibly

put together.

So you can't

compromise the network

and the more people

join it,

the more secure

it becomes,

the more valuable

it becomes.

So more people join it,

the more decentralized

it becomes.

You can't beat it.

Why do you?

Why would you

expand energy

doing anything else?

Yeah.

Why did you take.

In a life on its own.

And my bitcoin

is that Bitcoin

ultimately demonetized.

Is gold as well.

Gold

cult is ten times

the size of Bitcoin

is bonkers.

Gold is just terrible.

Really inefficient

energy money.

Bitcoin is perfect

energy money.

So yeah.

So I want yes. Yeah.

So it doesn't have

intrinsic value

but it has

it has real world

energy value.

Someone's had

to expend energy

to bring that

into existence.

Yeah.

Not press

a key on the keyboard.

I wanted to

ask you, Joe.

And I'm going

to read your quote of

my note notebook.

I don't misquote you,

but once you, you once

you called Bitcoin

the most asymmetric

bet of all time.

What did you

mean by that?

Because it can

only lose 100%.

The most

you can lose is 100%,

but the most

it's going to go

up is forever,

because they're

never going

to stop printing money.

So when you measure it

in something

that someone's

going to print forever

and ultimately print

an infinite amount

of it,

it's going up forever.

So if you

if you

want to think

about how I stole

my economic

energy forever,

you have to

use Bitcoin.

There's no alternative.

And it's

the most asymmetric

bet of all time

because

most people

have no idea.

But it's

entirely obvious

once you connect

the dots.

And so

the total global

asset base

of everything

is about 1000 trillion

top market real estate,

the bond

market collectibles

all gold

thousand trillion.

Bitcoin is 2 trillion.

So it's 0.2%

and everything.

We've already

talked about

the decisions

you make

when you understand

Bitcoin.

You don't buy

the other stuff.

You sell the

other stuff

about bitcoin.

And so yeah.

So if you are

adamant in your view

that Bitcoin is perfect

money,

that everyone

in the world

is ultimately going

to understand,

and once

they understand,

they never go back,

then ultimately

everybody understands

one day.

And if everyone

understands,

everyone thinks

like you

and they don't

want anything

other than Bitcoin.

So for that

to be 0.2%

of everything right now

is ridiculous.

That's what I mean

by the greatest

asymmetrical power

of all time.

And it happens.

Yeah, it happens once.

This is a

civilizational change.

You don't

you don't go back.

Yeah. Go back.

There's

there's a quote

by an Australian

Bitcoin

called Peter

Dunn with that

I absolutely love.

And he said it's

not the big that eat

the small.

It's the fast

that eat the slow.

And I love that quote

for Bitcoin

because yeah

for obvious reasons.

Bitcoin.

Cannot eat everything.

You

you can't fight

incentives

long term.

And it's a

competitive vantage

for everybody.

And humans are humans.

You can't fake

human action.

You can try

and put structures

in place

that restrict

human action.

But we all know

those structures break.

That's what history is.

History

is about

putting structures

in and around humans

to constrain

what they do naturally.

And the last year

period of time,

and then the collapse

Bitcoin is

is a humanity upgrade.

A big one.

Big one.

And it removed I.

Never thought yeah,

I never thought

I would ever seen

anything like this

in my lifetime.

And I just

feel grateful

every single day

that I'm alive

to see this happen.

Like, it just.

Yeah, it's amazing.

Yeah, yeah.

I think we look back

in our old

age, hopefully,

I mean, hopefully

as we get to old age,

not hopefully

this happens.

And think,

how is it

not just so obvious?

How is it

not so obvious as quick

as most people haven't,

haven't even done

a small amount of work.

Yeah.

And so

my encouragements

everyone would be

just to just start,

start

reading something,

watch

what's the problem

then watch a few

more videos

and you'll connect

the dots and

hopefully never look.

Never look back

and then

take control

of your life again.

Be optimistic

about the future.

Absolutely.

And I

don't want to keep

you much longer

because we're

already quite

long into this podcast.

But the last question

I want to ask you,

Joe, is

a speculative one,

but it's

you're speculating

on your own self.

Okay.

And where

like where

do you hope to see

Bitcoin in

the next ten years.

As an active medium

of exchange?

That's the

missing piece

right now.

For us.

It's seen as

increasingly

a store of value,

especially pushed

by the financial,

participants,

financial players,

etc., etc.

it's absolutely not.

It's money.

It's peer to peer

electronic cash.

It's not something

you put in evolve

to never touch

Bitcoin

is going to become

the medium

of exchange globally.

We're just trying

to remove

those frictions

at this point,

it is coming.

You're never going

to need to.

In my view,

you're never going

to need

to sell your bitcoin

because one day

you'll just

spend it all

your shopping in it.

You pay mortgage in it,

the mortgage would be

a lot smaller.

And it is today.

I bet you'll use it.

It's peer

to peer

electronic cash,

but it's your long term

economic battery.

It is everything.

It's your

store of value.

It's the medium

of exchange.

And ultimately

it's how you think.

It's your it's

going to be

your unit of account.

You don't think in

Aussie dollars anymore.

We think in Bitcoin

that's that's

where it's going.

It just takes time.

And so my

my personal focus

next ten years

how do we help.

How do we fix

medium of exchange.

I have a feeling

it will happen.

And I'll tell you why.

There's

this one little clue

that happened

in BlackRock's,

letter 2025 letter

to the investors

and shareholders.

Small line

that says

if US doesn't

get its debt

under control,

it's going to lose

the world

reserve currency status

to Bitcoin.

And he didn't say

the Chinese yuan.

He said bitcoin.

So it's almost like

America

has an incentive

to push this.

F well yeah I guess

there's a slight nuance

there as well because

you can have

you could have

they could have

easily said gold.

Right.

And that

that wouldn't make gold

the medium of exchange.

It would just be

the reserve

currency is what you

would hold

in your vault.

Yeah.

So where are you

going with this?

And so yeah,

I mean that's

absolutely true.

Bitcoin

will replace the dollar

as the global reserve

currency

is the wrong thing.

It's currency on money.

At some point

in the future.

That's not ready.

No one's ready

for that.

Yeah the infrastructure

is not ready for that.

Yeah.

So many fiat currencies

will die completely

before then.

And I,

I believe

we're going to see

a reduction

in number

of fiat currencies

we have globally

over time.

And they will either

move to the dollar

or bitcoin,

especially as the

dollar promotes

as the US promotes

stablecoins

which can then eat

fiat currencies

all over the world.

Dollar is

fiat currencies

very easily

on, low cost

payment rails instantly

everyone will

have a choice.

It's the dollar

or bitcoin,

but the choice

of the US,

it will be the dollar

built on bitcoin,

because the US knows

the only way

out of being solvency.

It finds itself in

is by owning Bitcoin.

And so the way

that they all going

gold in Fort Knox,

they already

are the biggest bitcoin

holders in the world.

And they know

they're staffed.

Their administration

staff full of bitcoins.

They know

Bitcoin is

the only way out.

So you've got to own

as much bitcoin

as quickly as possible.

And you're

collateralize

the dollar with bitcoin

by doing so

drive Bitcoin adoption

globally in Bitcoin

becomes partner

to the dollar

and helps cement

the dollar's position

as the

global reserve currency

for a number of years

to come.

But ultimately

Bitcoin it's

the dollar.

Because why would

I want to use

the dollar when I

can just use Bitcoin.

But by

enabling the dollar

to retain its

primary status

for longer

than it should,

it makes the world

aware

and very comfortable

with Bitcoin.

So then why do you

need the dollar?

That's how I see the

how I see

the future playing.

Now obviously

I'm going to be

totally wrong,

but that's

the marketplace

of money.

That's that's

how I see it.

As I see it.

Yeah. Yeah.

Well yeah,

this conversation

has given me so much

to think about,

and I'm very grateful

that you came

on the show.

Oh my. Pleasure.

Thank, thank you.

Thank you

for your time.

Lot lots

for,

people to think about.

And I'll drop some

links in the,

the podcast description

and yeah, thanks again.

Okay.

Well thank you,

thank you.

That's it for this week

on the Honest Money

Show.

Big thanks to be to

check out one more

Aussies are

choosing them at future

Root.com today

you and shout

out to our listeners

and found to

where you can earn subs

just by tuning in.

If you appreciate

the way

we cut through the.

Noise,

you can support us.

Directly via

the QR code

in the episode. Notes.

Until next week,

take care of yourself

and your money.