Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Technology's daily show (formerly the Technology Brothers Podcast). Streaming live on X and YouTube from 11 - 2 PM PST Monday - Friday. Available on X, Apple, Spotify, and YouTube.
Welcome to Technology Brothers, the most profitable podcast in the world. Today, we are breaking down the history and controversy surrounding DJI, the drone maker. You're probably familiar with these guys. And looking Not good. We don't like that.
Speaker 2:Looking to create some new controversies.
Speaker 1:Create
Speaker 2:some new controversies. Amp up the volume around it.
Speaker 1:Yeah, exactly. The reason we're doing this is because, a, it's a super fascinating story. It hasn't been told anywhere. Like, we couldn't find when we were doing the research for this, we couldn't find the, like, oh, there's a definitive podcast. Oh, somebody did a documentary about them.
Speaker 1:Like, there's very few articles. There's a there's Yeah.
Speaker 2:The primary video sources
Speaker 1:on it.
Speaker 2:Sketch are all AI generated. Yeah. Just slop content.
Speaker 1:It's really, really weird.
Speaker 2:Didn't even seem like it was the the audio was in English, but it what didn't seemingly wasn't generated by somebody who spoke native English because there were weird accents Yeah. With the audio.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's very, very odd. And then, of course, there's, like, a lot of drone operator content, like people reviewing the ins and outs of, like, the Inspire 3, how it compares. And, like, that's not relevant to this story.
Speaker 2:Yes. And and Frank Wang, the founder, like, hates journalists. Very rarely.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I don't know what he Put it that way. I think he just knows that if he No.
Speaker 2:There there was a No. He he's he's had some he's had some lines where he's like, I won't he doesn't wanna talk to so hating journalists is different, but doesn't wanna talk to the press. Yeah. Has gone years without doing interviews at different points.
Speaker 1:Well, at one point And it's We'll get to this early in the story. It's all just like her hero stuff. Like, oh, it was used to save someone who was trapped in the cave or tapped on top of Yeah. And now it's like yeah. It's being used in every war front.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. It's it's used in every battle zone and battlefield. So, I think we should kick it off with the the Ryan Mac article from 2015. Yeah.
Speaker 1:And this where you want to get some background first.
Speaker 2:We should do some background.
Speaker 1:Okay, let's do that. And then let's go into the. Yeah. The Mac piece. So, yeah, Frank Wang, born Wang Cao, is born in Hangzhou, Zhejiang province, China.
Speaker 1:From an early age, he shows a keen fascination with flight and aircraft.
Speaker 2:And and one thing, I I highly doubt he was given the name Frank Wang Yeah. Till he was probably in his a teenager at at whatever point he started interacting with the English were world Yeah. Because he would have just gone by Wang Tao Yeah. His entire life. So Yeah.
Speaker 2:At this point in time, his let's be very clear. His name is Wang Tao. He was born in Hangzhou. And, anyways Hangzhou.
Speaker 1:I mean, everything about this feels like somebody who would, you know, be working for Nat Friedman or get a Thiel fellowship. Like, even though he's on kind of the near peer competitor team. And so, you know, we're we're we're gonna figure out how to how to build our own DJI here in America, hopefully with some cracked Nat Friedman or Teal disciple. Yeah. He he does just seem like like a hacker kid who's just genuinely interested in stuff.
Speaker 2:There's 2 things that happen. And there's
Speaker 1:a different world where where, like, we would be, like, promoting this guy and be like, you gotta hire this dude. You gotta fund this company because, like, he's he's clearly a genuine hacker. He goes to Hong Kong University of Science.
Speaker 2:Well, before that, there's 2 there's 2 things that happened in his early life. He gets this book. I forget what it's called, but it's it's a story about this, helicopter adventure,
Speaker 1:and
Speaker 2:it's all about flight and just humming around. So this was, like, you know, before he was 10 years old. Yeah. This was, like, an early obsession. And then as a teenager, he gets an RC helicopter.
Speaker 2:Do you remember these things? They were Yeah.
Speaker 1:I I remember them. They were really hurt a liable.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Hard to fly. Yep. They crashed all the time. They were super fragile.
Speaker 2:And so he had a some moment where he did well in, you know, some exam and his parents got in the RC helicopter. He crashed it the 1st day and then had to wait 3 months to actually get
Speaker 1:The bat. The parts to be able
Speaker 2:to get it back up in the air.
Speaker 1:That's amazing. I I think the very first prototype that DJI built as a company was a was a single, what do they what do they call it? Like, single rotor or just like a helicopter, basically?
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And the other the other thing that's crazy before he ends up going to university, he his parents, like, had him living he didn't live with his parents. He was, like, raised by family members.
Speaker 2:His parents were originally one was, like, a teacher and then became a small business owner. His dad was an engineer, and so he he basically, you know, had I'm sure he had some trauma associated with with with that, just being a young children or child away from your parents.
Speaker 1:Adjust the mic a little bit. So he goes to Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, studies electronic, electrical engineering, becomes involved in robotics competitions, and stands out for his interest in flight control systems for drones.
Speaker 2:He also wanted to go to MIT or Harvard. Yeah. Didn't get in. Yeah. And so there is another path where
Speaker 1:he becomes
Speaker 2:basically an American.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Just gets super America pilled. Yeah. Just like, you know.
Speaker 2:So we lost a good one.
Speaker 1:We lost
Speaker 2:a good one here.
Speaker 1:Yeah. What's interesting is, I don't know if you remember, it might have been a little bit this is a little bit earlier, but in, like, 20 10, there was there started being those, like, viral videos of, like, Boston Dynamics, but there were also a set of viral videos from MIT's Media Lab and from MIT about drone swarm coordination. You see these really cool demos. It was basically a precursor to those, like, there's, like, fireworks shows, those live shows that we're seeing. But the tech just, like, never got transferred for some reason.
Speaker 1:Like, MIT guys were doing this, and then they just didn't build the startup because I think we'll get into why, because maybe there was a zero cost competitor that was really cheap and just crushing them at all times. Yeah. So really weird market dynamic. But, but, yeah, this was like 22,003 to 2010, I think, was when a lot of the foundational kind of algorithms were written for Yep. Flight control systems.
Speaker 1:And and really the discovery that when you put 4 rotors on a helicopter essentially instead of just 1 Yeah. It becomes way easier to calculate how to balance the the craft. And so, him when he's at HKUST, so the Hong Kong University of Science Technology, he joins this team and participates in the ABU Robocon competition, and he wins 3rd prize among teams across Asia. He gets $18,000 in Hong Kong dollars, which is about 2,300 in US dollars to develop drone technology. This funding, along with his growing reputation, encourage his him to pursue drone research more seriously.
Speaker 1:So he found DJI in 2,006 with the support from his mentor, professor Li Zhejiang, and a family friend, Liu Di Frank Wang formerly founds DJI Dazhong Innovations in Shenzhen. Early operations involved selling flight control components
Speaker 2:Shenzhen, I think most of our listeners will know, but this is, like, the industrial technological capital of China. So it's not the center of, like, business, but it's the center of
Speaker 1:Manufacturing.
Speaker 2:Scale, manufacturing Yep. Consumer hardware Yep. Etcetera.
Speaker 1:And And I think I think the like, everyone knows, like, oh, iPhones are made there. They have Foxconn. Foxconn deploys, like, millions of people as this massive company. But the really important thing about Shenzhen is that in America, it's like, if I need aluminum, I go to the aluminum supplier, and they're in Idaho, and they ship it to me. And then if I need a a little motor or a printed circuit board, it all comes from all over the place.
Speaker 1:In Shenzhen, it's like you walk across the street, and there's a guy that can do this type of machining. And then you walk down the street, and there's a motor company and then there's a battery company. And so everything happens really, really close. There's a ton of things. And it seems like he was able to just kind of go to, like, the Silicon Valley of manufacturing.
Speaker 1:And it's much like when you're in Mountain View doing YC and, oh, a company's failing, but they have a good iOS engineer. You just pull them onto your team. It's the same thing. Like, he started with just Yeah. Selling flight control components for drones.
Speaker 1:He wasn't even selling drones. He's just, like, hustling.
Speaker 2:And we'll get into this later, but there was his biggest competitor in the US failed not because of software. I don't actually know if they're failed. I I we should look it up, but Which one do you think? 3 d robotics. Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2:It's, like, a 175,000,000, and then they eventually just conceded on the actual hardware front. They were just building software for DGI.
Speaker 1:Yep. I think you also why why do they wind up pivoting to industrial, basically?
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. So one thing that, is fascinating here is is Frank ends up over time really churning through employees. A lot of people are leaving within a year or just frustrated with him, but his mentor, who is his professor at school Mhmm. Lee.
Speaker 2:Yes. Zhijiang and a family friend, Lu Di, who I believe, was was one of the first investors. They end up forming this inner circle, and both the professor and the family friend become billionaires. Off of DJI. Yeah.
Speaker 2:So and and, Li Zhijiang, ends up becoming chairman or is has, like, a significant has a significant board role. Yeah.
Speaker 1:And so, I mean, in the early days, 2008, I think 2008 was still wait. Obama just got elected. And so this was, like, peak, like, globalism. The Internet will turn China into a democracy. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Everyone we're all friends, and, you you you know, China's joining the World Trade Organization. And so there's really nothing but positive news, and it's just like, oh, cool. Like, there's a new awesome company doing cool tech stuff. It doesn't matter where they are. Of course, they're there because, like, the yeah.
Speaker 1:They China's good at manufacturing. We're good at other stuff. It's fine. We'll trade. And and so all the all the initial stories are just about, like, genuinely great impacts of this stuff.
Speaker 1:Like, during the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, DJI drones contribute to the relief efforts by capturing aerial images, assisting rescue and recovery teams. And we kind of saw that recently with the LA fires where people were putting up drones sometimes bad and crashing into planes. That was really bad. But but some of the some of the aerial photography is genuinely very helpful to understand where the fire is spreading. And I'm sure, like And it's a
Speaker 2:100 times cheaper than flying a helicopter helicopter. For sure. It's safer.
Speaker 1:And so the the company was still pretty small, and largely reliant on, Wang's determination and external funding. In 2010, they start expanding. So he hires his high school friend, Swift Zija, to head DJI's marketing efforts, and then they pivot to cater more actively to the growing community of drone hobbyists around the world, preparing the ground for broader consumer adoption.
Speaker 2:Yeah. So early on, some of their first products were some of the best in in market Yeah. But still clunky. Like, now you can buy a DJI, get it, have it in the air, like, probably within 20 minutes if you were speed running it. Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2:Very simple to set up. It even integrates with your iPhone Totally. With a native iOS app.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:But early on, it was still there were these hobbyist people that were just obsessed, you know, with flight, but doing it in a in Yep. In a in a more, you know, just not not doing planes. Right?
Speaker 1:Yeah. The the big the big tipping point for the consumer moment, I think, was when, the camera feed became live so you could see where you're going from the drone's POV. Yep. And that actually happened through this integration with GoPro, where you used to have to you used to have to you buy the drone, and it would give you the motors and the batteries and and a controller that can fly it. But you would have no idea where you wouldn't be able to see the drone if it got out of your line of sight, basically.
Speaker 2:It was very, very hard. They hit. Yeah. Yeah. And you could cry.
Speaker 2:And so if there's no camera on the drone too, then you're just sending it around.
Speaker 1:Exactly. What's the point? Kind of hanging Yeah. Yeah. Flying.
Speaker 1:And so and so people figured out that they could that they could attach a GoPro to it and then record. And then when it got back, they could unload that footage. And then eventually, people figured out like, the hackers figured out how to livestream footage from the GoPro. But then I think it was the DJI Phantom 3 had a GoPro integration that would let you do that, and then the Phantom 4 had
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:And I remember
Speaker 2:I remember even on the as people started hacking these and and adding functionality to them that that DJI would eventually do themselves. I remember at this time being into surfing and, snowboarding, skiing, things like that. People would though that community really picked it up because it was like, hey. We can get before if you wanted to get capture a big wave, you had to have a helicopter in the sky and what people can afford. Yeah.
Speaker 2:No way. Except the top, like, whatever. 1.01%.
Speaker 1:Yeah. All my extreme sports buddies were super into this.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Just it blew up overnight. Yeah. And so that was the first that was kind of transitioning from the hobbyists, like people that just wanted to fly to people that were using the
Speaker 1:And then the POV GoPro videos were going viral too because this is the time when YouTube's growing really fast. And, you know, any backcountry skier would just mount to a GoPro.
Speaker 2:What year what year did GoPro go public?
Speaker 1:I I feel like
Speaker 2:Ben, could
Speaker 1:you look up, can you perplex do that? Thank you. They went they went public in 2014. Do you know how much GoPro is worth today?
Speaker 2:Like, couple 100. 150,000,000? Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2:Rough. Yeah. Rough. And I and and there's bunch of reasons for that. Right?
Speaker 2:Like, it just got to the point where people are like, okay. My iPhone's pretty durable. Yep. It's 80% is good.
Speaker 1:Yep. And DJI has a competitor. Have it in my pocket. DJI has mode. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's you will get into this, but DJI has a competitor to every single DJI product, but d, but GoPro does not, DJI has a competitor to every single GoPro product, but not reversed. And And there's been
Speaker 2:some talk about later. Integration. DJI sells everything at cost.
Speaker 1:Yeah. That's wild. So we should talk a little bit about the 2011 desktop in BGI America. This is pretty interesting. Yeah.
Speaker 1:So Wang
Speaker 2:needs Wang needs an America guy. Right? He knows that America by this point, the hobbyists have started adopting it. He sees the early signs of consumer adoption. He's like, I need I need mister America.
Speaker 2:Of course, he finds a guy who was a former reality TV contestant, and so you meet, Wang meets this guy at a trade show. Immediately oppressed with with Colin, salesmanship, and they decide to partner to form DGI North America. Yeah. And this, like, sub is focused on the US and just broadly drone sales outside of outside of China.
Speaker 1:Yeah. The reality is that you show to, like, actual power pipeline is maybe wildly underrated. Yeah. It's always seen as, like, very low status to go on reality TV. But Trump, Chris Williamson was a reality TV.
Speaker 2:Well, I've talked about this with with the players and and people that wanna join PMF or Die. I'm like, look. This look at it as an opportunity to not just build your company, but build your brand. Like, we can accelerate you to that Yep. Whatever.
Speaker 2:5000 x followers that can change your life even if your company doesn't work.
Speaker 1:Yep. And so they they build this subsidiary, but very quickly, there's this, there's this fight between, and and we'll get into this more when we dig into the the the the next article, around control over the entity because, of course, DJI North America is owned by DJI, which is a Chinese company, which is, you know Yeah. Just in in Yeah. So it says is not entirely controlled by the CCP at this point. It's like it's very hard to get capital outflows from the from Chinese investments, and so there's a lot of, like, tricky
Speaker 2:stuff. So, basically, so I'm gonna read a few paragraphs here. So by late 2012, DGI had put all the pieces together for a complete drone package software, propellers, frame, gimbal, and remote control. The company unveiled the Phantom in January 2013, the first ready to fly preassembled quadcopter that could be up in the air within an hour of its unboxing and wouldn't break apart with its first crash. That's kind of like referencing Wang's early helicopter that the RC helicopter that crashed.
Speaker 2:Its simplicity and ease of use unlock the market beyond obsessed enthusiasts. And I remember around this time, kids started getting them for Christmas.
Speaker 1:Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2:Like that.
Speaker 1:That's huge.
Speaker 2:Yet things had already started falling apart between Wang and and Colin Gwen, the the head of North America. DJI's founder didn't like that Gwen was taking credit for the development of the Phantom and was calling himself CI of DJI Innovations, a title that still stands on his LinkedIn page. Savage.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I mean, it is so American to, for the chairman of this company to come in and be like, we need you to be the face of this company, and then immediately the the American is just like, I'm the man. I I'm CEO. CEO. Let me take all the credit.
Speaker 2:Sources also say that Gwen would often rush into setting up partnership agreements, particularly one with action camera maker GoPro, which would have been the exclusive camera provider for DJI's drones. So it sounds like, who knows, but Gwen is just running around just, like, doing deals Yeah. Being loud. Yeah. And that doesn't really align
Speaker 1:with Gwen
Speaker 2:that much. So Wang got cold feet in the GoPro deal and went against Gwen's advice, subsequently angering GoPro, which is now, and this was written in 2015, is now rumored to be developing its own drone. So Yeah. So 2015 was really, like,
Speaker 1:the turning point. I think that's what, we should Wait. But we should cover it because in 2013 Yeah.
Speaker 2:This is important. By May 2013, DGI attempted to buy out Gwen's stake in DGI North America, offering DGI Global shares that would have given the American a paltry 0.3% stake
Speaker 1:Wow.
Speaker 2:In the Chinese company. Gwen, was not happy with this, points out that his office's work in North America led to 30% of Phantom's being sold in the US. So it was a super, you know, key market.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:DGI didn't leave room for negotiation. They locked out all of DGI North American employees out of their emails, redirected all customer payments to China headquarters. By New Year's Eve, the employees had been fired and arrangements were being made to liquidate the Austin office's equipment, and DGI still ended that year with a 130 in in top line revenue. So they get into a lawsuit, and, this is all around the time that Sequoia is leading. Wait.
Speaker 2:It's funny because so the the Sequoia deal happened in mid 20 14.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:And they invested 30,000,000 out of 1,600,000,000.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:Through So it's like, I don't even understand this investment, to be honest, because from that point I mean, I guess, it's their the
Speaker 1:housing investment went to a 100,000,000,000. Right? Isn't DJI worth, like, a 100,000,000,000 or something now?
Speaker 2:I don't know. I don't actually know.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2:But it's still privately held?
Speaker 1:Yeah. Privately held.
Speaker 2:Okay. Ben, can you look up their their current valuation?
Speaker 1:Evaluation. And and, anyways, Grant
Speaker 2:so so they get in a lawsuit.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:Apparently, they settle. Nobody knows the exact, nobody knows the exact price at this point. But but, you know, people have said it's somewhere around $10,000,000. So so Gwen, kind of got kinda got screwed. Shafter.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And, he sounds like a lot of the American employees did as well.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Even the 0.3 would have been, I mean, I if I'm right about the 100,000,000,000 mark, would have been 300 mil.
Speaker 2:Mil. Yeah. But you could tell from some of the, ways that Wang would talk about Gwen. He never really respected him. Yeah.
Speaker 2:He just would say, like, oh, yeah. At times, Colin would say something that inspired me, which is just like can imagine the American being like, dude, this is gonna be huge. And then Wang's like, nice. Yeah. And pat on the back type of thing.
Speaker 1:Yeah. DJIs. Does it Market can 1,000,000,000 that was in 2018, and this year's the Yeah. Yeah. So I
Speaker 2:think last private valuation's, like, 15. So yeah. Okay. Sequoia has it on paper some somewhere around a 10 x. Yeah.
Speaker 2:They've turned 30 into 300 ish million. Yep. But now that's also locked in China.
Speaker 1:Yeah. With their
Speaker 2:Yeah. So, you
Speaker 1:know investment vehicle. Yeah. But, yeah, I mean, like, the news and just just everything about DJI starts ramping up from 2014, 2015 because Sequoia does the deal, then Accel comes in and leads an an even crazier round, I guess, in terms of ownership, like Yeah. Being very low. They raised 75,000,000 from Accel, and it valued the company at 8,000,000,000.
Speaker 1:So that's less than 1% sold. And that valued the company. They're raising a new round at 10,000,000,000, and Wang owns about 45%. So he'll be worth 4 and a half 1000000000.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And that's where it starts to
Speaker 1:get into,
Speaker 2:clearly, they have they were in Shenzhen. I'm sure they got amazing terms early on. Yep. But it starts the narrative starts to get a little bit confusing because they also Wang also talks about how they intentionally would sell their product at cost. Yeah.
Speaker 2:They just were looking to recoup, the sort of cost, the hardware cost. Yep. And so it's sort of unclear how they're scaling this because the thing about the thing about, selling consumer products like this, if you're if they're, like, 10 x ing, like, they're not 10 x ing every year, but they went in a very, very short timeline from no revenue to $1,000,000,000 plus revenue a year. So to actually achieve that scale, you have to be buying inventory out, you know, forecasting inventory. You've got to be buying, you know, with that kind of growth rate, very hard to fully bootstrap it without a huge access to capital because you're buying your q4 holiday inventory in q2.
Speaker 1:Exactly.
Speaker 2:And where's that money coming from if you're selling the product that costs? Right? It's really So there's a bunch of, this article that we're referencing is written by Forbes. It was written by a guy named Ryan, Mac, who's not very well liked in the valley. And he was also accompanied by someone named Hung Shao, which we don't have backstory on.
Speaker 2:But, so anyways, this piece very much felt like a like a puff piece. Right? Where
Speaker 1:I mean, I think I think no one was thinking about DJI in any sort of negative sense. It's like it's a it's a really cool tech company that's building hobbyist drones for surfers and people love it. Everyone loves it. It's amazing. It feels magical when you drive, when you fly them around.
Speaker 1:And then also they just they just did back to back insane up rounds by the 22 of the top venture firms. Yeah. Sequoia and then Excel. And so you're just like But all the all the green lights are flashing.
Speaker 2:Sequoia Sequoia Excel rounds. The interesting thing is, they were just tiny checks. Right? Like, these
Speaker 1:Yeah. Tiny ownership. It wasn't normal, like, overtaking 20%.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So they're they're saying, yes. We want American investors in because they could have accessed that capital Totally.
Speaker 2:China or anywhere else. Yes. We want American investors in. No. We're not gonna give you any amount of ownership that would allow you to have any meaningful say or anything over the company.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And so at this time, there's also an American upstart that we should talk about.
Speaker 1:Let's start with the greatest threat to Wang's dominance. So the consumer drone market emanates from the sun drenched 4th story office patio across the bay from Silicon Valley in Berkeley, where engineers for 3 d robotics spent dozens of hours testing the latest code tweaks in their phantom killer, the Solo. Unveiled in April, the black drone whirs and buzzes around the roof with the sound of a 1,000 angry bees as CEO 3 d 3 d Robotics CEO Chris Anderson explains how his company is the Android to DJI's Apple In admiring his quadcopter's elegance and simplicity, which took cues from the Phantom, the affable Anderson explains that it is the software, not the hardware, that is the key, of course, because it's basically impossible to build a competitor to DJI in America just through the American supply chain. Even if you even if you assemble it here, your motors, your batteries, everything's gonna come from China. So they have to make the the the software argument.
Speaker 1:Unlike DJI's operating system, which is closed to developers, 3 d Robotics made its OS open source to attract interest of programmers and other companies such as dozen dozens of Chinese copycats undercutting DJI's margins with even cheaper drones. If everyone is using our software, says 3 d Robotics CEO, then we, not DJI, control the market. DJI started as a company back in the days when it was just a hobby for me. And to their credit, they accelerated brilliantly. Right now, we're playing on their home field, so we're playing catch up.
Speaker 1:There were a couple companies that tried to make the software differentiation. Skydio, when they came out, D'ambr their drone, it did have better software for, like, one cycle where you could you could, get on a bike, put it up in the air, drag a little circle around yourself, and say, follow me, and it would follow you perfectly. Like, it would avoid trees and still follow you, and it would go under power lines and around. And Yeah. You could you could ride your bike from from home to work.
Speaker 1:And and I I had a buddy, Kyle, who worked there at the time, and it was, like, the most incredible demo. Casey Neistat was pushing it. But it was, like, 3 times the cost of DJI drone.
Speaker 2:And then and
Speaker 1:then the next revision, DJI was like, yeah. We can kinda do the same thing if you're not.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. And so that is one of the big problems with competing with DJI is from the beginning and from our analysis today, they're still selling, when you look at the total cost to deliver these products, they're selling them at less than it costs to produce them. Right? Because they were oriented around how do we recoup our costs on the hardware, but the cost of everything else.
Speaker 2:Right? Like customer support, sales, all these things. Like, it's very unclear, how they were able to finance this. And if you're if you're coming in even 3 d robotics, by I think 2020 had raised, like, $175,000,000. How do you compete with a company if your product is 3 times more expensive and not as good?
Speaker 2:Yeah. It's not.
Speaker 1:And so I I think just to take the other side of that, so, like, the the the tinfoil hat explanation is, like, they're deliberately undercutting costs to, you know, put effectively, like, spy drones all over America. Right? Yeah. That's, like, the most extreme representation of that of that of
Speaker 2:that time. Or alternatively, they like, the the most extreme is to say they are a consumer, they are a Chinese military contractor disguised as a consumer tech company. And they could have tons of non dilutive funding Yeah. From the government. That's covering losses.
Speaker 2:That's covering the losses that are happening at
Speaker 1:the economy. Even seeing that. I think that's very reasonable. To take the other side of that, I would say that the idea of making no profit for decades is an effective business strategy. We've seen it at Amazon.
Speaker 1:We've seen it at Tesla. Tesla didn't make operating profits for a very long time, and I would not say that Tesla is certainly you know, Tesla could be a company that manufactures tanks one day Yeah. If we get into that type of conflict. Teslas are popular in China. In fact, you can't drive a Tesla next to the Forbidden City because Tesla's had cameras on them, and they don't want Tesla sending that footage back.
Speaker 1:So just like we should, in theory, stop DJI drones from flying around, like, the White House and stuff.
Speaker 2:Which they just lifted restrictions and said you can fly them anywhere, which is the most insane Yeah. To me. So so yeah. We'll talk about that in a bit. Yeah.
Speaker 2:That's a But, but, yeah, it's funny because
Speaker 1:But but but my point is that there is there is a rational, like, just purely economic, non geopolitical explanation for selling a product at cost or below cost for a long time while you capture a market. And and if you and and let let's say the DJI was was just like an American company. It would still be rational to say, let's just hoover up all the capital we can, sell below cost, get 70% 77% of the drone market, keep everyone out, just keep killing startups, keep killing startups until we just are so dominant that no one can Yeah. Can possibly catch up. And then we can raise prices.
Speaker 2:None of that none of that information is available. True. We only know that they raised 30,000,000 from Yep. Sequoia, and they raised 75 from Accel. Those both those firms were there's very possible that neither of them even have information rights.
Speaker 2:True. Like, it's a Chinese company. It's a Chinese company. They have very, very little ownership. Yeah.
Speaker 2:They have less ownership than his inner circle who has 10% here, 15% there, etcetera. Yeah. So, And
Speaker 1:so let let's continue with 3 d robotics to get into this competitive dynamics. 3 d robotics, which has funding from the likes of Qualcomm and SanDisk, is well into its game of ketchup and has moved most of its manufacturing capacity from Tijuana, Mexico to Shenzhen. Gwynne, who is the company's chief revenue officer so, this is Gwynne's company after so Gwynne was the guy who was at DJI North America, gets in the fight with DJI Splits. He joined 3 d Robotics and Chris Anderson to kind of, like, fight back and build I mean, we were always saying, why is there no DJI, American DJI? Like, this was the attempt in 2015.
Speaker 1:And, and it was a it was a certainly a rough go competing with DJI. So, they so Gwyn is there. He's the revenue officer, and he's exploring the same retail channels he built up with DJI. And he develops a partnership with to put GoPros on 3 d robotics drones. Wang dismisses their chances, sounding like sounding something like the big kid on the kindergarten playground.
Speaker 1:It's easier for them to fail, he says. They have money, but I have even more money, and I am bigger and have more people. When the market was small, they were small, and I was small too, and I beat them.
Speaker 2:Yeah. He's got some crazy he's got some so so Wang is like,
Speaker 1:get why this guy doesn't do media anymore.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. He's not very well media trained. He also he also went on record around that time and goes, China has money, but its products are terrible.
Speaker 2:Its service is terrible, and you have to pay a hefty price for anything that's good. And it can't be understated that DJI is the 1st consumer global consumer tech powerhouse to truly come out of China. Right? It's the only brand other than TikTok Yep. Which arguably was, like, you know, not even a native Chinese company Yep.
Speaker 2:To, to really get win over the hearts and minds of consumers globally and get this level of market share.
Speaker 1:Do you remember a hoverboard craze around this time? 2015? So it was like this this, like, flat kind of skateboard with 2 wheels on either side, and you'd stand on it and it would balance automatically. And so it wouldn't work like a hoverboard. Those were like ripsticks?
Speaker 1:I don't Or no. Oh. Oh. This is the thing. Yeah.
Speaker 1:So so this was the fascinating thing was that these products just were just birthed from sun Shenzhen, white labeled. And so there was no main brand. Like, maybe Ripstick was the main brand. No.
Speaker 2:They're thinking
Speaker 1:of Swagway was one of them.
Speaker 2:You're thinking of the one wheel type thing?
Speaker 1:No. No. No. It has it has 2 wheels. It's, I'll I'll pull up a picture.
Speaker 1:But, but people would just call it a hoverboard. And it had, 2 wheels. You'd put your foot feet on it, and and the wheels would be to the left and the right of your, of your feet, and you would just kind of balance on it. So it was this. Do you remember this then?
Speaker 2:Oh, yeah.
Speaker 1:Yeah. No one's numbers
Speaker 2:came out of it. It just came out of nowhere.
Speaker 1:And and and they had try to pull
Speaker 2:up a big picture and show the camera. Like because, like, I I remember, like, soldier like, it would be, like, rappers would just Yeah. Ride them around everywhere.
Speaker 1:So this one's like it. GoTrax, which is a brand. It was like the classic, like, get your teenager this for Christmas and they'll ride it around a little bit. It didn't really work on, like, city streets or anything. It only worked on, like, polished concrete floors.
Speaker 1:People would ride them around in, like, offices. I think it was probably featured on HBO's Silicon Valley at some point. Yeah. It's very, like
Speaker 2:And I think drones were drones like, Wang faced a ton of competition internally in China. Totally. Everybody was seeing how much revenue he was doing. Because the thing about Shenzhen is people on the ground quickly understand a lot of factories can do the same thing. Yep.
Speaker 2:If you see a factory that's just got thousands and thousands of employees and is just buzzing, you're the factory across the street and you're like, well, we should get into this business, too. So they all it's highly, highly competitive. People copy each other.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:There's tons of corporate espionage. Wang deals with this a lot. He even calls, Shenzhen a dog eat dog society, which his words, not ours.
Speaker 1:What?
Speaker 2:He's not he's not calling it. Yeah. He's not commenting on that. Rough rough and tumble over there. Yeah.
Speaker 2:He's just saying it's a little rough and tumble. Yeah. So, he says that the boutique ness of the market always gets driven out. So, oh, no. That's a Gartner analyst, actually.
Speaker 2:Okay. And so, yeah, I think as opposed to these hoverboards, drones have the software hardware, the stack complexity, the costs that make it not the easiest product to if DJI is selling a drone for $700 and they're not even making money on it Yeah. Why enter that market if it's you also have to deliver all the software and this consumer Yeah. Experience. And,
Speaker 1:yeah, I mean, DJI built a good brand in America.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:And and then and then super great integration. I wanna go through
Speaker 2:This guy is like hosts. This guy is like founder mode to a t. Doesn't wanna share the skies with others, intent on maintaining DJI's, lead as drones expand into commercial applications, construction and mapping, and he's he's saying you can't be satisfied with the present. There was a good story. I thought this was funny.
Speaker 2:At one of the Phantom launches, there was this big, they had this huge keynote, and he no showed the keynote himself Okay. As the CEO. Why? Because he wasn't fully satisfied with the product. He was just like, I'm not gonna go.
Speaker 2:And Wow. He didn't wanna associate. He was like, it's my company. I didn't wanna associate with it.
Speaker 1:And and this is the thing I keep him. It's it's it's, like, you you know, requires a little bit of in intellectual flexibility because, obviously, like, this is now, like, a rival military company. So but, like, I feel like I would really like this guy if I was on his team. Yeah. And I would just be like, this is this is Well,
Speaker 2:I don't know if you would like him, but you'd respect him. Totally. Totally. Clearly never cared about being liked.
Speaker 1:Right? Yeah.
Speaker 2:He would, you know, talk poorly about
Speaker 1:Yeah. But I would be impressed by him, and I'd be like, oh, yeah. Like, okay. This guy's, like like, clearly got some really insane entrepreneurial and technical talent that's, like, super valuable and worth
Speaker 2:Yeah. It's a lot of self laudable. Like, you know, clearly studied, you know, electrical engineering and mechanical engineering in school robotics, but then, like, clearly just kept studying it and being that obsessed with product, never resting on, oh, the Phantom is, like, the best drone in the market. It's like, cool. We have to make Yeah.
Speaker 2:Phantom 2 even better.
Speaker 1:And so, I mean yeah. DJI goes on a tear, launches more and more products. I wanna go through some of the some of the timeline on X, formerly Twitter at this time. So in 2020, Flo Crivello, who's been on the show before, says, what's DJI's moat? And, and this is an interesting question because I think there's there's actually 2 different questions around the moat.
Speaker 1:It's what is their moat in China and then what is their moat in America? Because they are somewhat different. And I think I think it definitely comes down to software integration and now integration between the different hardware platforms because there there are actually unique ports and integration points between you can get a DJI I think it's actually plugs
Speaker 2:into this. I think it's actually more simple than that. Sure. DJI has basically owned Shenzhen, which is the place to manufacture these products. Yep.
Speaker 2:They also have continuously been so focused on on selling them for the absolute bare minimum Yep. That and they have the most scale Yep. That nobody can compete truly compete on cost. Yeah. If they're doing 1,000,000,000 of dollars a year in revenue
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:And you wanna if you're in Shenzhen, let's say you, like, have factories in Shenzhen. Okay. Well, you're not gonna do the volume from day 1. You're not gonna be able to access the capital. Yep.
Speaker 2:You're not gonna be able to nobody's gonna wanna fund the number 10 player to lose money for 5 years. And so having that almost, like, monopoly, the moat in many ways is we The scale of the ocean. Yeah. You can't build these products. Even 3 d robotics is trying to make imagine this the sabotage.
Speaker 2:So so one thing, they they do this throughout the entire kind of history of the company. They're super aggressive on any new drone entrant. They'll flood the forums with comments. This sucks. This sucks.
Speaker 2:One of the wired here in America, there's a guy who had a hobbyist drone for him. He was the editor of wired, and he was, I believe, was involved with with 3 d robotics. I can't remember. But he he realized that there was hundreds of users that had the same IP address in Shenzhen that were all commenting, like, really negative.
Speaker 1:I I bought this in And
Speaker 2:they would do it they would do it on YouTube. They do it on the forums. And so, like, they are aggressively making it impossible to compete on price. They're they're so focused on innovation, too, that it's impossible to compete on the product layer. And so in my view, it's less about looking at it as like what stops like what stops other people from coming in is, like, well, we can't burn.
Speaker 2:If we wanna compete with DJI, we have to burn $200,000,000 in the next few years just to get I mean, and just to get any market share, and then the product has to be better Yeah. That consumers pick us.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I I was talking to some of our buddies about this, how, one of my friends, Ryan Lackey, was saying that he right now, he's been actively buying the specific type of DJI drone that has this certain, like, lidar sensor or something on it because it's basically a $5,000 sensor if you just bought it, like, by itself, but they sell the drone for, like, $3 or something. So he's like, it's just the best way to get this particular sensor. And then I rip out everything else to, like, kind of de China ify it and get all the code out. And then I run, like, open source software on it.
Speaker 1:But he was like, it's like everyone should go and buy 1. Like, it's the best, like, hardware deal in the world right now. And so, yeah, it's like it's not just that they're the lowest cost that they're actually providing, like, an Apple like experience, but then also driving the cost down. So so so the Chinese competitors can't just spring up and turn it into, like, the hoverboard market. And a lot of that has to do with, like, the hoverboard, like good software.
Speaker 1:It can only do so much. Like, it's never going to get you. Forward, backward or backwards. Exactly. It's never going to be like, oh, now with this software, like, you can go on sand.
Speaker 1:Like, no, that's not going to happen. Whereas, like, really good software with a drone means like, yeah, it's not going to crash into the tree because it's going to detect the tree and not let you crash into it. And that's. Yeah. It's stable.
Speaker 2:And the cameras.
Speaker 1:And the video is better and and records better. And, oh, it doesn't lose the link with your phone when it's flying away. Like, all that stuff's pretty it's actually pretty difficult to build. And so once they have all of that, they have this this powerful effect. But then they also drive cars
Speaker 2:with they built software across the entire, you know, that would make it so across the entire US. A user couldn't fly into protected airspace. Yep. Which they then just they just killed this year, which is absolutely insane. Or or last year.
Speaker 1:Just to get, so we'll go we'll go into some of, like, the the the political, controversies as they start cropping up. But, I mean, again, from 20 from 2010 to 2015, people were just like, oh, cool drones. And then Yeah. 2015 to 2020 was basically like, wow. Like, new Apple.
Speaker 1:Like, this is amazing. This is a cool consumer company. It's amazing that Sequoia and Excel got a piece when they did because this is clearly a banger company. Yeah. And then things start to ship.
Speaker 1:But we have a interesting tweet here from Gabriel Lewis, who I follow. I just went and looked at who who who's talking about DJI back in the day. This was years ago. He says, I just got a DJI Osmo for my birthday. It's incredible and allows for smooth cinematic shots like this one on an iPhone.
Speaker 1:Highly recommend to anyone trying to up their Instagame. And it's just, like, completely apolitical. Just like, yeah. It's a cool product. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Like, people weren't even thinking about this stuff with any sort of geopolitical lens. And then, Palmer in 2020 is starting to think about DJI and how military drones will kinda play out. And he says, today, we announced Ghost 4, waterproof, shockproof, intelligent, and silent. It's a small drone that can fly for a 100 minutes, 3 times longer than a DJI Inspire, but with better sensors, longer range communications, and an even smaller carrying case. And so this was something when when when Andrew was launching the Ghost helicopter drone, a lot of people were like, oh, well, like, it's it's it's cool, but it's not actually selling that well to the military because, like, it's kind of a niche use case.
Speaker 1:Like, it it it it's like most I think most first off, back then, there weren't any wars going on. So it's hard to be like, yeah. We need 10,000 of these every month. We got it just blowing up, like like what happened with, you know, like missiles during the Ukraine crisis. Yeah.
Speaker 1:But at the same time, like, it's very clear that Palmer understood that, like, the drone infrastructure is going to become important. And so Yeah. You know, he's already
Speaker 2:Now that's the real
Speaker 1:of that.
Speaker 2:The real the real, you know, crisis here is even if, you know and we can get into this in a little bit, but even if you have a better drone, can you make a same amount? Exactly. Can you make a million? Because then you make Yeah. A 100,000.
Speaker 1:It's a attrition warfare. It's industrial warfare.
Speaker 2:Shenzhen could almost overnight turn every one of their factories into just drone
Speaker 1:production facilities. Be very, very
Speaker 2:easy to retrofit. But, but, yeah, another so so the only kind of negative,
Speaker 1:Take me up to, like, 2022.
Speaker 2:Yeah. So so 26 2015 to 2018 are just a, a generational run. They're winning Emmys for their drone camera technology. Frank becomes Asia's youngest tech billionaire, the world's 1st drone billionaire. They he's, like, on business insider lists.
Speaker 1:Oh, there's a good one in here where, DJI becomes the official video partner of the America or of the the amazing race, which was the show that, they call it Wind was on. And so it's like, he's like, I'm on top of the world. Like, totally throwback moment.
Speaker 2:DJI also enters into a partnership to distribute drones to US police departments, which is, you know, if if, DJI is is is a Chinese military contractor, just like, you know, incredible work, you know, and then the you know, coming up to 2019, and and it'll get a little bit more frothy from here, DJI has figured out that employees were running this scheme where they would inflate the per the prices of costs, that DJI was buying and and presumably, like, take out
Speaker 1:Padding invoices.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Basically, like, get paid out on the back end from from the suppliers.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:And so they lost up to a $150,000,000 here, but didn't really make a dent. Like, they're doing 1,000,000,000.
Speaker 1:That made headlines. It's like, oh, they've been defrauded for a $150,000,000, and I it is. I'm just like
Speaker 2:month of their revenue. And so it's like, yeah. It sucks. And and they they came down on on those people pretty aggressive.
Speaker 1:Highlight, like, the chaos that goes on in Shenzhen. Like, I'm sure there's lots of, like, shocking deals, stuff. Yeah. People, like, you know, making all sorts of
Speaker 2:There's not, like you're not going over there being like, I trust everyone that I've that I'm interacting with.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's a wild west.
Speaker 2:Yeah. It's a wild west. So by by 2020, they've completely won. They have 77% of the US drone market, and and no other brand has more than 4%. So just complete dominance.
Speaker 2:That's more than the iPhone.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And that's more than Tesla.
Speaker 2:And then we're gonna just kind of, like, accelerate up into some of their other issues. So, they were found in 2022 to have infringed on a patent from a company called Textron. Textron is accusing DJI of infringing on their flight control system patents, related to hovering. Right? Because, like
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:Perfectly balancing a quadcopter and positioning it in the sky relative to how you're controlling it on the ground, very difficult to do. And by 2023, they're actually a US jury finds DJI drones do infringe on the patents on on automated hovering, and DJI has to pay $279,000,000 in damages, which again is is, I'm sure that was, like, you know, basically nuked their entire net income for the year, but probably, again, do they really care? They have 80% of the market. And, again Yeah. So there there's still, as of today, the world's most dominant drone manufacturer.
Speaker 2:And part of the the the, you know, interesting thing that happens here is around this time, the Ukraine war is happening, and drones for the first time are being used at scale on the battlefield. So everybody woke up and realized kind of all at once, hey. You know, there were actual experts, analysts that had been warning about the use of drones in warfare for a long time. But but this was the first time that people started seeing drones as this is the next rifle. Right?
Speaker 2:This is the gun Yep. Of, the new Yeah. Of this century.
Speaker 1:And so for those for for those, like, drones that you see in Ukraine and Russia, usually, there are sanctions that say that China can't sell that military technology, that dual use technology into the battlefield. Yeah. But what happens is that people will go and buy them in countries where they're legal to sell and then just fly over there. I've actually heard of people, like, going from Best Buy to Best Buy buying every single drone and then just hopping on a flight and selling them for 10 times the price and being like, yeah. I took a 1st class flight because I I bought $10,000 worth of drones in America, went to Ukraine and sold it for a 100 k or something like that.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And so to be clear, like, both sides are are, you know, using using for sure, this stuff.
Speaker 1:And there's these crazy aftermarket devices that will hold a grenade and then click one button and just like drops it or something.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And so DIY. So everybody realized that this at one moment, hey, American consumers have been supporting what could be the most important military China's most important military contractor because the tech is dual use. Yep. It it takes very simple modifications or no modifications at all to turn it from a spy robot to a cute little consumer drone that Exactly.
Speaker 2:Somebody's flying around their kid's soccer game or whatever. Right? Yep. And, yeah, I think, like, our our conclusion, we can probably get into some more recent posts.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. Let's go through the timeline, and I think that will, that will take us up to the modern era. Martianspacecolonist says, can companies in China sue companies in the US for patent infringement? What stops US companies from straight up copying DJI designs?
Speaker 1:And I don't think that it's the IP or the design that that's super important. I think it's the the software integration and the scale economy of, like Manufacturing capacity. Look at DGS manufacturing facility, and it's like you know? It can it's a stargate esque, like Yeah. You know, massive factory.
Speaker 2:In the same you know, over the last year, people within tech have been telling consumers we cannot afford to have China own the digital equivalent of The New York Times. They're the most important CNN. Right. We just cannot afford it. Gen Z gets all their news from this place.
Speaker 2:Like, we can't. And they're like, but I like to talk. And so when you think about people trying to compete with DGI, American consumers on average have no issue with it being a Chinese company. Right? They don't they're they're not sort of enlightened to the potential dangers of that.
Speaker 2:And so if you tell them, hey, you know, here's this DGI product that's $1,000, and here's this American product. Let's say you could set up, you know, you could manufacture even within 50% of the cost of d j DJI. Well, they've already shown they're willing to sell products and not make money on them. Yep. So where's your profit gonna come from?
Speaker 2:And you can't manufacture them as cheap as them. Yep. And so and the American consumer doesn't care. Yeah. That is the sky.
Speaker 2:You're American.
Speaker 1:Like, Skydio had just as good intellectual property, but they did not have the scale economies. And so they're doing this 4 k.
Speaker 2:So So it's like, yeah, that somebody who's buying a drone for their kid's soccer game, it's just not gonna pay
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:4 grand.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Even for even for a better product, which I
Speaker 2:I did I did want us to film a video where we went and used DJI drones on the range Yeah. As, like, targets?
Speaker 1:Yeah. We just go like that. Yeah. Fun. So bubble boy in SF says, the DJI drone when it hears me criticize Xi Jinping, and it just boom.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And this this can't I mean, so there's we don't have a tinfoil hat here, so we're not gonna, go too far into it. But everybody should be somewhat concerned that Israel has the technology Yep. To blow up consumer electronic devices Yep. That have been in high sort of hibernation state for however many years it was, the the rational thing to do is is to assume that China has this capability.
Speaker 2:So luckily, most people keep their drones in a box. So I don't you know, I'm not too worried about them. Just like
Speaker 1:And here's another example of, dual use. But but the the last thing is
Speaker 2:the drone, all of the consumer tech, the same thing that can be used to follow you while you drive ride a bike around. Hunter. Hunter's team here. It's capabilities. Right?
Speaker 2:Like, it's it's it's all there.
Speaker 1:It's way it's way scarier than than TikTok.
Speaker 2:From a potential, like, loss of life Totally. Catastrophe.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Because this is like if there is if there is like a like a hot conflict, like, you could just ban TikTok.com at the DNS level. You could just tell everyone, hey, like they're actively spying on you. If you open TikTok, they will have your geolocation. They'll be able to send a missile or something like that.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:And very quickly you'd be able to.
Speaker 2:And the other. But
Speaker 1:but if there's a wall of drones coming at you because they're able to manufacture 10,000 a day, like, that's that's, like, much scarier.
Speaker 2:This is an interesting the other part about Wang that we haven't covered yet, Wang has had an obsession with fight getting robots to fight each other from as long as, like, we could.
Speaker 1:His favorite movie is Real Steel.
Speaker 2:Real Steel, which is. Yeah.
Speaker 1:A terrible, terrible movie.
Speaker 2:But he he rock himself every single year in China. They have this thing called Robo Master, which is like a battle. Have you ever been to Battle Bots?
Speaker 1:Yeah. That's right. Yeah. Actually, when when I grew up, they they they did a version of this at Caltech. Yeah.
Speaker 1:And it was amazing. And they would they they would change the goal every year. So 1 year, it'd be like you have to build a robot that plays soccer against another robot that plays soccer, or you have to climb up some wall. It was all these different robotic challenges. It wasn't fully just fighting.
Speaker 1:Yes. Now there's a whole robot.
Speaker 2:Wang has such an obsession with getting robots to fight each other. He's sponsoring contests every year. Yeah. Making TV shows, movies.
Speaker 1:There's a documentary about it. They have their own, like, drive to survive f one style show about Robomaster.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Is that crazy?
Speaker 2:And then they also sell a DIY kit that turns your drones into killing killer drones. Yeah. It's just like, okay, so you cannot assume that that Wang just loves the skies.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Loves cool videos of snowboarding. You know? He wants he he wants to fight.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I I referred a client to a web development shop, and I guess it I guess the deal went through and it was, like, a couple hundred grand or something. So they wanted to send me something nice. And, and they sent me a DJI, a drone, but one that didn't fly. It had, like, these wheels, and it would drive around.
Speaker 1:And it had this little, like, turret on it that could, like, shoot a Nerf dart. And it was, like, very much it it was a really cool product because it was, like imagine an RC car, but instead of, like, a $100, it's, like, a couple grand and it's made by DJI. So it was, like, you had a camera on it. You could drive it around. You could, like, do tank turns and spin and stuff, and it could go anywhere.
Speaker 1:It was really, really cool. But, yeah, I gave my and so I was like, this is kinda crazy. But speaking of modifying these things, Jake, says, the IDF and this is back in 2021. The IDF has been using small drones to drop tear gas on protesters in the West Bank. And, Tech CEO Pepe says, on the phone with DJI support trying to order the white phosphorus add on.
Speaker 1:And this video is crazy just dropping tear gas. So, I mean, these drones, we we we know that they've been used for this stuff. They're actively being used, whether it's DJI or not. And then Palmer, Palmer Luckey says, in case it wasn't clear, Anduril has, in fact, received money from the United States government. I feel bad for the employees of companies like DJI and TikTok who have to pretend that they are not backed by the Chinese Communist Party.
Speaker 1:Also, don't forget that TikTok bans people for being gay. The only reason they don't do it in the US is because they need money from the woke teenagers who don't know or care about anything outside their bubble. Early to everything, Palmer. And then in 2022, the the the pressure on DJI is ramping up, and Catherine Boyle says, lobbyists for Chinese AI drone manufacturer DJI are successfully lobbying Congress to remove a ban on selling Chinese drones to the US government and law enforcement. The Biden administration calls DJI a Chinese military industrial complex company.
Speaker 2:Yeah. So just one example of that. DJI, drones are used to, so the Uighur Muslims
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:In China are are have been, there's been a bunch of reporting on on basically they're held in camps. They're basically, you know, being genocided. DJI drones hover over the camps to watch them 247. So they're being used to spy internally in China. And so it's not a conspiracy theory that they're a government contractor.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Of course. A government contractor.
Speaker 1:Of course. Luke Metro is highlighting a story. He says, wake up, babe. They just reverse engineered DJI AeroScope. And so I think what the story was was that someone figured out how to hack into the DJI system to, when you see a drone, figure out where the operator is.
Speaker 1:Interesting. So very quickly, you you you see a drone in the sky. You know, okay. You know, we could shoot the drone down, but we probably wanna get the operator. And so, this is, like, very risky from if you're using a drone in the field, you're putting in a signal.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. In Ukraine, you don't wanna, like, have, like, some sort of EMF signal going out that can be tracked. Santiago San Santiago says, who's building the American made DJI competitor for consumer slash agriculture?
Speaker 1:This is a critical space, and I'm eager to back credible efforts in this space. DMs and checkbook open. CC, Josh Steinman, Naval, Steve Simoni, and Yukon k 9.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And people like Naval have been actually really loud about Drones. The use of drones, those weapons. I think it was his quote saying the drone is the rifle of this century.
Speaker 1:I mean, Naval was saying that, like, he's worried that the idea of traveling in a plane will be something that just doesn't happen anymore because the economic equation of of if it costs someone $10 to shoot down a 747 with a drone, people just won't fly anymore. And if and if it's just like a random terrorist can just build a drone and just take out commercial aircraft, flying is just gonna be kind of impossible. And it's and it's kind of unclear what countermeasures you could do to just like a normal flight if they just get if if things get really crazy with, like, drone related terrorism or drone related Yeah.
Speaker 2:The only thing
Speaker 1:I'm not sure. I I don't wanna have some pilot.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. It's it's kind of like it's never been in in prediction. The reason that people don't kill people all the time Yeah. Is not because it's super expensive.
Speaker 2:Right? Like, it's you could buy a bullet for a dollar. Yeah. But still people are not, like, going around Yeah. You know, becoming murderers over that.
Speaker 1:But, but
Speaker 2:I think it's a it's a it's a sort of dystopian.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Hopefully, just like electronic countermeasures, you could just have every 747 have something that just blocks signals from most commercial drones, and then they're blocking them. I mean, even with the fires with that drone that hit the the the firefighting plane and took it out of commission, like, that could probably have been stopped with some Yeah. Some countermeasures. Ashley Vance, in 2024 says, two and a half years into its war with Russia, Ukraine still relies, for the most part, on DJI drones built in China.
Speaker 1:This means Russia has modest pull over the PRC, and the west still can't make cheap drones.
Speaker 2:I got so many notifications that my phone Blew. Vibrated off. Across the table.
Speaker 1:That happens every time we, every time we stop recording, it's always just a flood. I I I think it might be interesting to go through this, this q and a with, DJI CEO Frank Wang, the creator of the Phantom drone. This is all the way from back in 2014. The Wall Street Journal asked him about telling the starting the company. He says, before we started the company, I spent 3 months intensely working on the project.
Speaker 1:At that time, I was enrolled at the university, but I skipped all the courses and just went to my home in Shenzhen. I would wake up at 2 PM and then work until, like, 5 or 6 AM for days at a time. One time, when I did go back to the university lab, I tried to use my ID card, but it didn't work. My heart sank a little bit because I thought I was kicked out of college by my professor, but I'd actually forgotten to pay my tuition. At the beginning when we started the company 4 years ago, we made flight control systems.
Speaker 1:We focused on the operating system for the drones, but it was hard to use. The drones were complicated, and the controllability was relatively poor. People couldn't use it on a larger scale. We felt a a multirotor drone should be very simple, very small, very reliable, and very cheap. If people could use the market if people could use it, the market would be larger, and he was 100% right.
Speaker 1:So slowly, we went from making the flight control systems to multirotor drones.
Speaker 2:Should we
Speaker 1:Who is your role model? This is the this is the headline. Well, of course, it's Steve Jobs. Personally, I was very aggressive. At college, I took part in team competition for robotics twice.
Speaker 1:The first time I worked very hard, and, technically, we did very well. But my teammates did not feel comfortable working with me. I was too aggressive. I just wanted to win. The second time, I was still aggressive, but I found the right team partner and the leadership was stronger.
Speaker 1:So that time, we won. I realized that not being so easygoing is not such a good thing. But after I read Steve Jobs and discovered he had the same type of personality, it encouraged me. I understood that staying aggressive is the right thing to do to build a company. It's fascinating.
Speaker 1:Are we seeing the emergence of a new breed of Chinese companies such as DJI? Chinese companies are getting big are getting better before they lag behind. Now more and more Chinese companies are doing well worldwide like Huawei, Tencent, and Alibaba. I think later, check more Chinese companies will go global and their image will gradually change. Definitely right about that.
Speaker 1:I think the important thing is vision.
Speaker 2:Yeah. We are actively trying to change the image of DJI.
Speaker 1:As to this, those companies have one that is in sync with the world. What's the future of DJI? I believe that the direction of our company is driven by our initial dream to make a very easy to use product that can realize the human dream to fly and to make it perform so well that everyone can enjoy it. In addition, we will develop our business in agricultural and industrial and all kinds of fields. The next 5 to 10 years will be very exciting period for unmanned aircraft, and I'm looking forward to the future.
Speaker 1:And 10 year this was 10 years ago.
Speaker 2:And Yeah. You gotta give him credit for being very early and very right and just great execution. That said, I do want to jump forward and talk about, you have an article from, the New York misinformation, the times. The old timers? The old timers, from April 25th 2024.
Speaker 2:So just, less than a year ago. And so, yeah, basically, around the time that people got concerned about China or, sorry, TikTok
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:There's also a lot of concern around DJI Yep. Congress. Now Congress is weighing legislation that could kill much of DJI's business in the United States by putting it on a federal communications commission roster, blocking it from running on the country's communications infrastructure, which would be interesting approach. And the other thing that's interesting here that's different than TikTok is nobody's paid anything to TikTok. Right?
Speaker 2:You maybe buy some products on TikTok from ads. Mhmm. But some of the additional controversy around banning DGI is that consumers have spent 1,000 of dollars on these products. And if you brick them through legislation, there's can be a lot of pushback there under you know, people love the drones. Right?
Speaker 2:Like, there's people that race drones and, you know, all that stuff. So
Speaker 1:I think it would be very slow that they were to ban it because Yeah.
Speaker 2:A Which is why we need to ban it now.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I I think the I think the biggest problem is, like, bringing in new drones that could have even more advanced capabilities because, realistically, the the the military capabilities of, like, a Phantom 3 or Phantom 4 or even, like, a DJI Mini 1 are not gonna be as next generation as what's coming across in the next cycle of products. And then also, even even with what the the proposal for TikTok, the actual legislation was that Apple and Google cannot host the apps in the App Store.
Speaker 1:But if you have the apps installed, they'll continue to work until the operating system updates and breaks the app. And so, like, this would be kind of a slow phase out. And then even some of these drones, they can be used without the app for a while. So I I I don't I don't think and, honestly, most of these drones, people fly them for, you know, Christmas Day, the day after, and they start collecting dust. I don't think it would be that big of, like, a massive loss for consumers.
Speaker 1:Yeah. But people would certainly be upset.
Speaker 2:Yeah. So it doesn't if patents and signage, a lot of legislation would effectively ban any new models of DJI drones from that point on. It would not apply to drones already in use. And there was a house bill that had bipartisan support. They met with a muscular lobbying campaign by DJI.
Speaker 2:The company is hoping that Americans, who use its products will help persuade lawmakers that the United States has nothing to fear and much to gain by keeping DJI drones flying. And, representative Elise Stanefic, who's a Republican in New York and was one of the this bill's primary sponsor says, DJI presents an unacceptable national security risk, and it's past time that drones made by communist China are removed from America. Government agencies have shown that DJI drones are providing data on critical infrastructure in the United States to the communist party. Miss Stanifik said, without elaborating, any attempt to claim otherwise is a direct result of DJI's lobbying efforts. So DJI sells a lot of drones in United States.
Speaker 2:They've and, the the beauty of, selling them to US consumers is that those consumers are basically providing Yeah. You know, if if DJI who knows? It'd be really interesting. I doubt they have this information public, but I bet it's like DJI drones take 500,000 flights a year Yep. A day in the United States.
Speaker 2:Yep. Some who knows? It could be way less or could
Speaker 1:be way more. Good summary of this exact point from Hunter Weiss. He says, I do think there's a huge problem with DJI drones as someone who has used them for 8 plus years. Every flight transmits the footage back to the CCP. All these drones are elite mapping spyware, and there's 1,000,000 in circulation.
Speaker 1:They record every coordinate per flight, plus all imagery is then processed through their app back to China. It's the greatest mapping software ever. They made 1,000,000,000 on the drones while getting all the footage from across the world as personal data back to the CCP. Their customers became the greatest spy asset for mapping real time locations for every new flight. Very interesting.
Speaker 1:The, I do think that there's a way to to, like, kind of, like, sandbox the drones, you know, and, like, actually see what data is being transmitted. I think that almost the bigger issue is that people are just they're just voluntarily saying, yes, please up my upload my footage to the DJI cloud, and they're actually opting in to send the data. So I don't think that they actually have to steal. Yeah.
Speaker 2:But but to be honest, let's be real. Like, you cannot trust
Speaker 1:I think they could get stealing it, but the CCP. Yes. Yeah. I I agree with you, but I think that they might not even need to be stealing it because I think people might be voluntarily saying, like, yes, please send my drone flight. It's like when you get that up when you get that, question that says, like, like, would you like to send diagnostics to the developer?
Speaker 1:That's basically, like, yes. I'm opting in. You have breaking news?
Speaker 2:No. I just yeah. I wanted to kinda catch people up to speed. So, basically, they go they go back and forth. Yes.
Speaker 2:I was gonna cover The Verge piece. Sure. They go back and forth for a while. They have spokespeople, these lobbyists, and they go, this is Regina Lynn. We should ping her and ask her what it's like to be a traitor to the United States.
Speaker 2:Our products are designed and intended to promote the general good and benefit and benefit society. And they have, she denied that the drones have been involved in human rights violations and said they were not meant for surveillance. Okay. Surveillance and capturing live video are one for 1. Right?
Speaker 2:You cannot argue that, oh, we're just capturing capturing live video of a scene is surveilling the said scene. And, anyways, the she, another another another person says DJI's ownership is primarily concentrated in the hands of its founders and early stage executives, none of whom are government officials or representatives of government or state owned entities.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:And so the reason that this just doesn't stand up is, like, you can be the most you can be Jack Ma.
Speaker 1:Jack Ma.
Speaker 2:And if you say even any type of negative comment about the state get disappeared for months months months. So it doesn't matter. It's got an explicit threat.
Speaker 1:Yeah. The implicit threat informs your decision making even if you don't have a contract or a email address. You don't need a hand. And just just the vibe that that they would they would. Make one comment
Speaker 2:on a stage and be disappeared. Yes. So they don't need to own the company. They own the founders. Right?
Speaker 1:Yeah. And so, the latest news is that, Sam Lesson is quoting The Verge. The Verge says, DJI will no longer stop drones from flying over airports, wildfires, and the White House. And Sam Lesson says, I see how this works. We move to ban China's TikTok, so they respond by dropping DJI's no fly zone enforcement for drones.
Speaker 1:Welcome to 2025 International Road.
Speaker 2:To me, this seems like we're getting banned YOLO. Let's always capture as much data as
Speaker 1:Just, like, straight up is, like, like, if we turn this geofencing off, like, someone might use a drone for just straight up terrorism and, like, crash at the White House.
Speaker 2:Just pure chaos. But the other side is some enthusiasts is like, I want to fly over Area 51. Yep. You know? And, like, you can't stop a drone from if if somebody is like some crazy, you know, UAV, UAP person's like, yeah, I'm gonna fly over Area 51.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And it's not gated.
Speaker 1:Well, you can't stop it if you have an andro, like, anvil unit on-site, but a lot of places don't.
Speaker 2:Launch the an isn't the anvil like explosive?
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. Well, no. No. The original anvil just has, just a weight in it.
Speaker 1:And so it's purely kinetic. And this is the whole story with Palmer figuring out how to shoot down DJI drones. I know. Saying, you know, you're saying warfare takeover. And what he realized was that if you just run into it, that's actually the most efficient way to destroy it.
Speaker 1:And so the anvil is just like it was a quadcopter, basically, with just like some mass inside, and it just crashes into the other drone. They do make one. I'm just playing explosive in it. Now I feel
Speaker 2:like they got planes. Let's let's, you know, play it out. If some, you know, somebody that that watches a little bit too much, Jesse Michael, goes down to Area 51, it is just like, I'm gonna basically I know my drone's gonna get killed, but I'm gonna get a live video. And then I'll upload it. Oh, live stream it.
Speaker 2:I'm gonna live stream this Yep. And just fly it as fast as I can. By the time the anvil reacts, maybe we're halfway across the base. Yep. Right?
Speaker 2:So, like, I think it's I think it's a little bit I mean, it's such a fuck you
Speaker 1:Yeah. Totally.
Speaker 2:To our lawmakers, to the people in the military that are concerned about this.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Do you wanna do this one or move on to the next?
Speaker 2:Hunter's on a on a roll. Hunter's on a roll. Friend friend of the pod. A great case study for and he actually worked for Casey Neistat back in the Oh, yeah. A great case study for what not to do in the diversification of your business's products.
Speaker 2:GoPro tried to enter the drone industry in a market already controlled by DJI. To top it off, the GoPro drone started falling out of the sky. Reef refunds, returns, warranties, massive loss. I think it was smart for GoPro to try to do this. They were the company best set up.
Speaker 2:They had a brand. They had distribution. Yep. They already had good quality cameras entering. Drones should be commoditized to some degree.
Speaker 2:Right? Like, we know how to make them now.
Speaker 1:Yeah. There's no network effect.
Speaker 2:There are patents, but there's no network effect. Yep. And then There's Yeah.
Speaker 1:So basically story where, like, they they they probably missed the the real opportunity, which was, figuring out how to change the playing field in Washington to create more of a level playing field with some sort of tariff at the very least.
Speaker 2:If you just make what what we've needed was a 1000% tariff on Chinese drones.
Speaker 1:That was impressive.
Speaker 2:Because it's like drones are such a nice to have. Yeah. Right? Like, there's totally a world where people that are videographers have drones. Yeah.
Speaker 2:Like, they have nice cameras. You just hire them when you want some drone footage. Exactly. And then Yeah. You could they could afford to spend a bit more.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And we all would be fine. I if somebody posts on their Instagram a video of them, like, flying over a hike, I I'm gonna that's a that's a regretted user second there for me. I I don't wanna see your drone footage. I just like it's not that.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:It's not that interesting to me. What else? So this is an article from December 18th, from The Verge. DJI escapes US drone ban but may get banned automatically unless Trump steps in. The US Senate passed a massive defense bill that gives DJI one 1 year to prove its innocence or it gets banned.
Speaker 1:Oh, interesting. So this
Speaker 2:is the National Defense Authorization Act. Yeah. It's an it's their annual defense spending bill, and, and it says, while it did not contain the full countering CCP drones act, which was the act that I was just talking about, provisions, it kicks off a 1 year countdown until its products are automatically banned. If DJI cannot convince an appropriate national security agency to publicly declare that its products do not pose an unacceptable risk to the national security of the United States, the act instructs the FCC to add DJI's to its covered list under the Secure and Trusted Communication Networks Act. Not only does that list keep that gear from running on US networks, it bars the FCC from authorizing their internal radios for use in the US, effectively blocking all imports.
Speaker 2:And so what's smart about this is all the lobbyists that were that were hovering over these lawmakers being like, don't ban it. It's just like a fun app. Your constituents love it. Think we've sold you know, you know, they were telling people, you know, we've sold 50,000 drones in this swing, you know, the swing county. Right?
Speaker 2:You know, in this town where you
Speaker 1:you You got a lot of fans there.
Speaker 2:You got a lot of fans there. Are you sure you wanna do that? And so now they're actually putting it in the hands of a national security agency, which in theory is much harder to Yep. Influence. That's fascinating.
Speaker 2:I didn't know that. And so this is like, to me, you know, for us, like, I think, like, TikTok is information warfare. DJI is like purely spyware with this, like, you know, asymmetrical risk of maybe these things could actually turn. Maybe there's backdoors and these things could actually be turned into actual weapons.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And I think the tide is definitely turning. I mean, that's a great example. But even just culturally, you can you can see that the tide turning. Josh
Speaker 2:And they're also they're also worried about DJI just exploiting the loophole by white labeling its drones. Yeah. And you could see a scenario where certain filmmakers are like, I love DJI so much. They're, like, buying black market DJI drones and, like, trying to figure out ways to use, like, shorter, you know, wave.
Speaker 1:Yeah. So Josh Wolf says, sadly, we are at war. Wars imagined by sci fi of yesteryear. 1, distribute tech, DJI drone, TikTok. 2, habituate or or addict the user.
Speaker 1:And 3, pervert the reason you are defiant to comply with American sovereignty and weaponize user outrage. And that's the that's the last second that you mentioned was, like, weaponizing the user outrage. And, I mean, this this vibe shift, this is a good example of this from Jason Lou back in April of 2024. He says, DJI is the hardware version of TikTok. It gets American operators addicted because of the economic model.
Speaker 1:It's so cheap, and you can go and resell your footage. So it's good business. Steals data intelligence to PRC. Hollows out domestic drone production capacity. We saw that with 3 d Robotics and, Skydio and so many other companies.
Speaker 1:And every American dollar going there is funding the Chinese military industrial complex. And this is definitely, like, early to the story, but still 400 likes. Yeah. And I think we should close, do you have do you have another thing you want to own? Another mess.
Speaker 1:It's good.
Speaker 2:I have another, I just have some some interesting so I on the r slash drones Reddit
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:There's people 1 month ago commenting, I've never encountered a situation like this. To me, it feels like learning. They're commenting on the potential ban. Yeah. Feels like learning videography and having Final Cut and Apple ban.
Speaker 2:You know, so Yeah. Yeah. A lot of up votes on that. The biggest change will be price. US drones are prohibitively expensive.
Speaker 2:Many who would like to fly for fun won't be able to afford it. Yep. Which is just like
Speaker 1:It's true in the short term, but not the volatility. Because in the long term, we'll have We can just manage our own Starlink. Yes. Starlink is so cheap. Why?
Speaker 1:Because Elon built a massive factory that cranes out a1000000 of them. If we if we just build that, we're fine.
Speaker 2:The reason I think it's funny to look at these, comments is because DJI has a known history of making fake accounts and commenting.
Speaker 1:Totally. Totally. Totally.
Speaker 2:And so you know that they're you know, they're flooding these.
Speaker 1:100%. I mean, it is it is insane when people maintain that. Like, it is impossible for us to build a cheap drone in America because the labor cost is not even that much lower in China anymore. Like, that the whole, like, labor arbitrage, it's cheaper to hire someone in China. That disappeared a couple years ago, and it's moved to other countries.
Speaker 1:Like, I think AirPods are made in the Philippines now, and there's a few other places. The main thing is just the the industrial buildup, all of the different manufacturing plants, and and the and the coordination of having all the different machinists and experts in the same place in Shenzhen where you can just walk around. But it's totally it's totally doable in the United States if we build a big facility. And we see that evidence with Starlink and and Tesla too. And so it's it's clearly doable.
Speaker 1:We just need to have the the will, the political will to do it. And so do you have anything else, or should I close out with this Josh Diamond banger?
Speaker 2:Always love to close out with Josh because he was on
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:In the national security community, former operator. He beat years ago. Yeah. But,
Speaker 1:really to all of this.
Speaker 2:I just think so, what else you got? North Dakota actually banned, already banned DJI.
Speaker 1:Oh, you're right. Just as a state.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1:So you can't buy them and ship them there maybe? Or
Speaker 2:Yeah. What like And even if they're requiring bring 1.
Speaker 1:Do I get in trouble?
Speaker 2:They have something called the drone. They're trying to fund a drone replacement program to help, you have to turn in the various agencies in North Dakota have to turn their drones in, and then the drones are gonna be used for counter UAV research.
Speaker 1:Right.
Speaker 2:So that's a good that's a good if our military if our military could buy back all these drones, we can use them for target practice. ACS can use them. Fantastic. And,
Speaker 1:so let's close out with Josh. He's quote tweeting, OSM Technical who says breaking from, breaking news. China's DJI, the world's largest drone manufacturer, has disabled US geofencing on its drones, enabling flights over airports, military bases, and no fly zones. And Josh says, use executive order 13873 to ban DJI. Do it now.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And so I have no idea what executive order that is, but Josh clearly does. And he and he I I what I love about following him is that he clearly understands the actual tactical moves that need to be done beyond just, you know, tweeting about it or talking about it or or having a couple, like, news cycles around this. And I think this this DJI story will grow a lot in the coming years. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's time until there's a question about, like, okay. When is it gonna happen? And my my optimistic scenario is that, there's not necessarily a Jeff Yass to DJI in the same way that there was to TikTok Yeah. Where where, yes, Sequoia has a position, but they spun out Sequoia
Speaker 2:China. Publicly defended.
Speaker 1:And and they separated the funds. Yeah. So the so the true Sequoia guys who are in America don't have economics necessarily to the same degree in DJI. And then, yes, Excel has a position, but it's a small one. They might have sold it already.
Speaker 1:Like, we don't even know. They have a lot of other positions. And so it's not the same thing as Jeff Yass having $16,000,000,000 on the line with TikTok. Like, at best, Excel has, what, a 1,000,000,000 maybe. Like, if they had 1% of the company still.
Speaker 2:No. There's no there's nothing that says they're a $100,000,000,000 company
Speaker 1:Sure.
Speaker 2:Anymore. They probably would be valued as purely a military contractor. And I bet you internally in China, they're like, yeah. This is a $1,000,000,000. Yeah.
Speaker 2:This could be a $50,000,000,000.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And so yeah. And I haven't seen any of the Excel guys come out as, like, super pro Trump donating a ton, like, really trying to get TikTok not banned. And so it does feel like the American economic interests are a lot less intertwined. Yeah.
Speaker 1:And and also the TikTok community, there are, like, millions of TikTok creators that are like, this is my job in America. And I don't think the videography community is nearly as big or outspoken.
Speaker 2:Yep.
Speaker 1:It's mostly a lot of people in, maybe, Hollywood, but that's it. And that's not a huge AMP constituency. So I don't know. I think we could see a band. But, yeah.
Speaker 2:I need to get more attention. This this, just came to my mind because yesterday, we were saying everybody should have their own project stargate where they they raise go out and try to raise 7,000,000,000,000. Even if you miss, you'll land.
Speaker 1:Half a trillion would be fine. 500,000,000,000.
Speaker 2:Yeah. You'll you'll land. Shoot for the stars. Even if you miss, you'll
Speaker 1:land on the moon. Put together a crazy dive.
Speaker 2:But we need a we need a project stargate for domestic drone manufacturing. Yeah. Like, to actually get anywhere close to Shenzhen capacity, which in a global conflict scenario, I promise you that China will stop giving us drones. Right? Because it will be drone on drone Yep.
Speaker 2:Violence, and so we need something at that scale to basically say, hey. If this is the next if this is the firearm of the century Yep. We need to invest a $100,000,000,000 into setting up the ability to make millions of these a year in the United States.
Speaker 1:Yep. That's a great place to close it out. Thanks for watching. We'll be back with the timeline in just a minute. Welcome back to Technology Brothers, still the most profitable podcast in the world.
Speaker 1:We are giving you a little bit of an update to Project Stargate, which we talked about yesterday. Pretty crazy story, but it's still evolving on the timeline on X. Sam Altman, Elon Musk and Satya Nadella, some heavy hitters in the tech world are duking it out. Jordy, what are they saying? And are they posting a slob or bangers?
Speaker 2:We have to slob or bangers. We gotta name this the time timeline and turmoil.
Speaker 1:Time line and turmoil. Like that.
Speaker 2:Yeah. But, but yeah. So so, again, they are are global fighting. Our tech overlords are fighting. They're going back and forth, not sparing any words.
Speaker 2:And this morning, Sam Altman is clearly has Lex Fridman in his ear Mhmm. Because he says just one more mean tweet, and then maybe you'll love yourself dot dot dot, which which That's harsh, dude. I mean, it's also I think this is kind of a cringe post.
Speaker 1:Well, yeah, because it's going so hard. You know? It's like Yeah. And like, cutting to someone. It's trying to cut it's making them cut.
Speaker 2:So where's where's I mean, where's where's the proof that Elon doesn't love himself? Yeah. It's sort of like
Speaker 1:It's a lot of money's post.
Speaker 2:If somebody said, like, oh, you're doing that because you don't love yourself, you'd be like, I love my life. I have a amazing wife, 3 sons. Yeah. I live in California, and I I Exactly. It's like I'm I'm I'm, just the modern Marlboro man, I should say.
Speaker 1:I mean, just in just in tech generally, I think that we like to be a little bit more rigorous and data driven with our criticism.
Speaker 2:Yeah. This is just kind of like playground.
Speaker 1:Well, it's it's it's it's somewhat at home. Yeah. Right? It's it's it's addressing the question of did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did did
Speaker 2:did did did
Speaker 1:did did did did Why? Like, like, software as a service, or is it just sassy generally?
Speaker 2:Just sassy. Okay. Yeah. Alright.
Speaker 1:At least at least we're being entertained. Yeah. You can just throw us in the ground.
Speaker 2:Next next we have, so Satya had an amazing quote yesterday that provided some great ground cover for everybody involved with this kind of heinous, I mean, one of the
Speaker 1:greatest quotes in tech CEO history.
Speaker 2:Yeah. I'm good for my 80,000,000,000. Which which, again, we said we said yesterday. To be clear, he very specifically phrases it as 80,000,000,000 for investment in Azure infrastructure and Yeah. Azure, OpenAI, Microsoft are so intertwined now, but he's not saying 80,000,000,000 for Stargate.
Speaker 2:He's saying 80,000,000,000 for his AI infrastructure needs.
Speaker 1:Right? Which you can use.
Speaker 2:Which you could use, but he's not committing it
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:By any means. So Elon gives Satya some credit. He says, on the other hand, Satya definitely does have the money, and Satya hits back with a crying emoji
Speaker 1:I love that.
Speaker 2:Which is Elon's signature. Yeah. It's good to see a $1,000,000,000,000 CEO using the crying emoji. It's I used to not use it, and then I realized it's so perfect for so many situations. Great.
Speaker 2:And he says, and all this money is not about hyping AI, but it's about building useful things for the real world. And that is clearly a jab at, at Altman, which just shows that everybody's got in a in a little
Speaker 1:But we're gonna get back to useful things. This is this is, can you can
Speaker 2:you I I I going, going, back to all the board drama and Sam getting fired Yep. Can you imagine being Sam and having Satya, like, sit you down and be like, how did you
Speaker 1:There was no sit down. He was on the board.
Speaker 2:No. I know. But he had invest I mean, if you invested $10,000,000,000 in
Speaker 1:the company I mean, I'm
Speaker 2:sure Don't you think, Sasha, is like, hey. You know, it's basically like, hey. Like, you're my guy. Yeah. How did you mess this up so badly?
Speaker 2:Yeah. Anyways, so, Nick, n s 123abc. Great username. Easy remember. Easily remember it.
Speaker 2:You guys wait. Dot. Dot. Samma Samma got cooked by Microsoft CEO, and just a screenshot of of that. Moving on, Vittorio fires his own version.
Speaker 2:He says, his great great Photoshop, the George w Bush. Sir, it's out to call you a hype boy. Just, just brutal. And really, that's that's what's going on. Sam did just make a post of a drone shot of a bunch of buildings.
Speaker 2:Really? And and it just was just the caption was big beautiful buildings sort of proving that we actually are building Okay. This infrastructure. And, I saw it commented on the area's post, and I was like, brought to you by CCP front DGI drones.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I saw I saw a time lapse of the Texas facility that's already being built for state. Probably that one. Yeah. It's rotating through, and it is impressive.
Speaker 1:Like, the the the the I mean, it's a huge huge build out that's already happening.
Speaker 2:And so in classic open so OpenAI, you can have whatever opinion you want on Sam, OpenAI. Sam, brilliant marketer. OpenAI, brilliant calm strategy. Yep. The strategy seems right now, he's under fire from Elon.
Speaker 2:Yep. His sister, Tucker Carlson. Yep. Right? Like, there's just all this stuff happening.
Speaker 2:He's a long he's making so many big announcements that he's pretty effectively drowning it out and keeping people bought into, you know, bought into the movement. Right?
Speaker 1:Because I think I I I I I mean, I think if you just went to coffee shop in the corner and you said, like, oh, man. Like, it's a it's a crazy day. Like, do you see what happened with Sam Altman today? They'd be like, who?
Speaker 2:Yeah. He's still not
Speaker 1:Most people, their interaction with AI is like, oh, you mean chat dot com where I go to.
Speaker 2:Which they're not even really easy. No, not yet.
Speaker 1:But like they but they know chat gbt. They don't know about these ins and outs of the drama. And so there is something to be said for just like,
Speaker 2:yeah,
Speaker 1:just one foot in front of the other.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Release new product, improve the product, and people will be like, yeah. It's chaos behind the scenes, but did the AI answer the question or not?
Speaker 2:Yeah. And so on that note, OpenAI has a huge, they're not really calling it a full launch. They're calling it a research preview.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:They are making it available to pro users, but why don't you get into what they're actually
Speaker 1:Yeah. So they in in the announcement here, they say they're releasing operator, which is an agent that can go to the web to perform tasks for you. Now chat gpt4o has already been able to go to the web and retrieve individual HTML pages, suck them in, and use that as context so it can get more up to date data. But this is a step forward in that the operator, it has its own browser, and it can look at a web page and interact with it by typing, clicking, and scrolling. It's currently in research preview, meaning it has limitations.
Speaker 1:But this is one of the first agents, which are AIs capable of doing work for you independently. You get a task, and it will execute it. And this is fantastic. I think this is gonna be very, very helpful. There's already been the ability to use JPG to write a little bit of code, like little code snippets.
Speaker 1:So I was doing something where I wanted to, scrape a website and just paginate through. There were, like, 20 pages of standard formatting, like, you know, list of, of, like I think it was, like, podcast episodes. And I just wanted them all on a spreadsheet, basically. And it was able to write the Python code for me, but it didn't really work because it needed, like, JavaScript and stuff. It was like it it just wasn't it just wasn't quite there.
Speaker 1:But with this, it's it's like the AI has a web browser that can fully render a web page and just click the button and then copy and paste stuff out. And it just we're gonna be able to interact so much better, and it will actually be able to go and do things for you. So they have a bunch of examples that we'll run through, but it's available at operator.chatgpt.com. You have to be a pro user, which is now $200 a month, but I think this will be what gets me to upgrade. The research preview allows us to learn from our users, and their plan is to expand into t plus and team and enterprise users in the future.
Speaker 1:So they're they're they're calling this a new model called computer using agents, CUA. So another easy to remember acronym that I'm sure will be, you know, no problem.
Speaker 2:And and one thing to note here, we've talked about this before. Whatever you're building, it's on OpenAI's roadmap, especially if you have any anything, if they believe that you will have product market that are you do have product market fit. There's a lot of heavily funded companies that have been building computer use agents, and so this just made it. This is like one of those moments that founders go through from time to time where the 800 pound gorilla does exactly what you're doing better, and they have more distribution. And, so not a great, I think it's really, if you're building anything on OpenAI or even not on their rails, you're waking up every single day not knowing when you're gonna refresh Twitter and have, accent and have a major, you know, announcement.
Speaker 2:And so It does exactly what you're doing.
Speaker 1:Yep. And so I I think the main innovation here that they're championing is vision capabilities and then reinforcement learning. And so, essentially, operator agents can see through screenshots. So it actually loads the web page in a browser, takes a screenshot, and then it can use that. Because previously, when when you wanted to automate some sort of interaction on a website, like, let's say you're just a, you know, sneakerhead and you're trying to snipe a a a new sneaker drop right at that moment.
Speaker 1:What you would do is you would write some code that says, find this particular button that has this class or this ID on it, and it's this div or it has a button HTML tag, and then issue a click on it. But if anything changed about that, the code would break. Whereas, when you go to a website as a human, you just see a visible, like, okay. I wanna click the blue button, and I can read what the text is. And so they're able to use the vision models to understand what the actual what what the actual website looks like even regardless of what the code says on the back end.
Speaker 1:And then they can interact with it using the actions all any action a keyboard and mouse would use. And because you can generate these web pages kind of endlessly and there's so much out on the web, you can run reinforcement learning to basically train the model just 1,000,000,000,000 of times. Like, were you able to get through this flow on Yeah. This particular set of of divs and buttons and forms? Yeah.
Speaker 1:Were you able to get through this flow? And then it learns from its mistakes and it iterates through and it probably got to a really solid place where they're confident. So now they're releasing it as a research preview. And so if it if it encounters challenges or makes mistakes, operator can leverage its reasoning capabilities to self correct. When it gets stuck and needs assistance, it simply hands control back to you saying like, hey.
Speaker 1:I'm confused. Like, do you want me to click Yeah.
Speaker 2:And that's a new product. Functionality where you're just kind of
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:Having the agent do things Yep. And it's now hiring you Yep. Back Yep. To accomplish what it wants to accomplish Exactly. Almost independently.
Speaker 1:And so they have a benchmark for this. WebArena and WebVoyager are 2 key browser use benchmarks. And so they have some evals out there, And they're very happy about their hitting new state of the arch benchmark results. To get started, you just describe the task you'd like to be done, and operator handles the rest they can take control over. And, operators train proactively to ask the user to take over tasks that require login, payment details, or solving CAPTCHA's, which is hilarious because it's, like, the human's only responsible for the CAPTCHA, basically.
Speaker 2:The most annoying thing,
Speaker 1:the link
Speaker 2:up credit card forms? Yeah.
Speaker 1:I mean I kinda like just looking at a nice landing page, but they're like, you don't need to do that. Just do the CAPTCHA human. Yeah. That's what you're supposed to do. And it's like, obviously, they can solve the captchas.
Speaker 1:Like, that's not a problem at all for these AI models now, but they're like, we respect captchas.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Interesting. Very funny.
Speaker 1:Yeah. So users can personalize their workflows and operator by adding custom instructions either for all site instances ones.
Speaker 2:Are are the models good enough to have this better accuracy than humans with CAPTCHAs, or is it about the same? Because every now and then, I'll still get, like, I'll get you know, you you're doing a CAPTCHA and you're, like, you you're just doing
Speaker 1:it quickly. You're messing it up wrong. Oh, yeah. That that happens all the time. I think that on the most cutting edge CAPTCHA is the one where it's, like, rotate
Speaker 2:and change. There should be,
Speaker 1:like, a
Speaker 2:CAPTCHA world championships where people just sit there, and they, like, do as many consecutive CAPTCHAs as you can. Yeah. And it just gets perpetually harder.
Speaker 1:Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And, Are you
Speaker 1:a robot? So I I imagine that if any AI team like OpenAI, XAI, any of these guys want Google wanted to really break CAPTCHA, they could create a superhuman model that beat it. But they wouldn't because the aesthetics are terrible and there's no economics in it. So it just hasn't happened, but it's not it hasn't it's not that it hasn't happened because of technical
Speaker 2:It would yes. If you did that and read it as a developer tool, they would be immediately abused. Exactly. Worst type of question.
Speaker 1:People would be like, thanks. You created a program that just ruins everything. The Internet. Yeah. Which is kind of already, like, the criticism with a lot of this stuff, the dead Internet theory stuff.
Speaker 1:So, users can personalize. So, basically, you can say, hey, when I tell you to when I tell you to book a flight, I like American or I like United or I like private, and it has to be a g 6 50 e r. Operator lets users save prompts for quick access on their home page, ideally for repeated tasks, like restocking groceries on Instacart. Similarly, using multiple tabs on a browser, users can have operator run multiple tasks simultaneously by creating new conversations, like ordering personalized enamel mug on Etsy while booking a campsite on Hipcamp. They have all these, like, hats
Speaker 2:like the most SF. Things. That's the most SF. I want, like, the place go gig along on this, like, degenerate poly market.
Speaker 1:Buying an AR 50 1 in the Hunt Parmetto State Armory. It'd be so funny. Oh, yeah. We should rewrite this. Negotiate all these my Porsche.
Speaker 1:Be insane.
Speaker 2:Well well well well submitting, offers on 100 of cars on Bring a Trailer.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Auction yeah. Auction snipe a a a Countach on Bring a Trailer for me and also yeah. It's great. Operator transforms AI from a passive tool to an active participant in the digital ecosystem.
Speaker 1:I'm sure people will love that. Some people are like, this is gonna be a disaster for my for my website maybe. Because, like, if the AI is is, like, better at avoiding, like, upsells and cross sells and stuff, stuff, that could really affect CTS.
Speaker 2:So it's interesting here. We're collaborating with companies like, DoorDash, Instacart, OpenTable, OnlyFans, Priceline, StubHub. It's
Speaker 1:not that one. That is not
Speaker 2:it doesn't actually say that,
Speaker 1:to be clear. Because Priceline, StubHub, Thumbtack, and Uber.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Because because a lot of this, it will does require opt in from these major players because DoorDash doesn't want you using bots in their app. Totally. Right? And this is a bot.
Speaker 1:Yep. And I mean, it's the same thing with,
Speaker 2:And it's funny because, again, the sneakerheads were doing this
Speaker 1:Yes. Yes.
Speaker 2:Since, you know, they've been building basically this functionality Yeah. To, Snipe, Jounce sneakers Yeah. Which I have, I'm a Jounce enthusiast. Okay. TJ Parker and and a number of other people appreciate the brand.
Speaker 2:And and and you it's very difficult to actually buy these things because the bot army is just descending on the launch. And Yeah.
Speaker 1:And it's funny because you you can see that there's a shift here where the first version of GPT 335, chat gpt, clearly was scraping mainstream media news sources, and that really agitated all the mainstream media sources. There were some lawsuits. But now OpenAI is going to those companies and signing partnerships before they ingest the data, so everyone's happy and everyone's making money. And clearly here, they were like, okay. Like, let let's be a little bit more upfront with people, get them on board early so that we don't run into anything down the down the line.
Speaker 2:This is so some of the partnerships they're working on are wild. They say to explore these use cases further, we're working with organizations like the city of Stockton to make it easier to enroll in city services and programs. So the city of Stockton is basically saying no one wants to use our terrible forms on our website. And it's actually wild to think about you're just instead of having to interact with the DMV or an organization like that, you can just be talking with your agent. It's like, hey.
Speaker 2:I need to renew my license. Yeah. And it just does it. It's like grand.
Speaker 1:You can put
Speaker 2:your SSN in here or whatever.
Speaker 1:This isn't the dream of the original, like, semantic web, like, web 2 point o.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:You know, like, the whole thing web
Speaker 2:Here's here's the crazy thing. There's been 100, maybe thousands of companies sprung up to build agents, probably not 1,000 globally, a 1,000. Probably lots. And they were all selling these use cases of, like, we're gonna make it easier to book a flight. We're gonna make it easier to, like, interact with the DMV.
Speaker 2:And this is They've been selling these so hard. And now because of OpenAI's leverage and market cap and scale, the city of Stockton is not gonna wanna work with your little, you know, your little agent that raised to 600 k pre seed. They wanna work with OpenAI. Same thing with, they, they also are partnering with Instacart on this. They say OpenAI's operators, a technical breakthrough that processes that makes processes like ordering groceries incredibly easy.
Speaker 2:Daniel, this is the chief product officer at Instacart. I have to ask, did did Instacart not already make it?
Speaker 1:Yeah. That is weird. That is weird.
Speaker 2:Because because it kinda seems like you're letting the fox into the hen house Yeah. Stuff a little bit because at what point does OpenAI like, oh, you know, so much of your volume is coming through now. We actually need we're gonna need, like, 20% of your net, you know, revenue Yep. Of any orders that we process. And then and then OpenAI is like, okay.
Speaker 2:Well, if you don't wanna give us that, we'll we'll happily go to Safeway and just let them know and all and we'll partner with all the grocers and just say, we do your online order. Yeah. Yeah. And we already we already have a 100,000,000 actives.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's always been a big question of, like, where does the AI sit in the stack? There's this question of, like because a lot of companies for the last 2 years have been like, we need to have a chatbot in the bottom of our website that lets people interact with our API or our service or forms or our website just through chat. And there was definitely this idea that, hey. Maybe the future of the Instacart app will be you show up.
Speaker 1:You just talk to it. Describe it. Hey. I'm making Yeah. Pasta.
Speaker 1:And then the next day, I'm gonna have steak and potatoes. And then the next day, I'm gonna have something else. And so can you just, like, get all those ingredients, put them in my cart, and order them? Yeah. And that would happen within the within the Instacart app, and it might be powered by an open source LLM.
Speaker 1:And Yeah. No one might get a cut. But now it seems like a lot of these companies are saying, actually, it's better if that if that sits at OpenAI, and that makes them more of an aggregator. Like, it it means it means it's more important than ever that that the ChatGPT app is in the home row of every, like, a 100,000,000 American consumers, that the company is seen as a consumer company, not an enterprise company. Because if if if it's truly, like, you know, like the start of booking a flight, that happened on Google a long time ago.
Speaker 1:Yep. They were booking websites as well. Now if it starts on OpenAI, that's incredible value capture. And so seeing, like, where the AI sits in the stack is, is fascinating. OpenAI certainly wants to make as much of it happen at the start of their app.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Interesting.
Speaker 2:And it's such a interesting dynamic having a the number one developer tool in AI also being the consumer product that's trying to eat all the people developing apps, which is why I think in the long term, OpenAI's brand is probably, I would call, top on their brand right now because people are still amazed.
Speaker 1:I don't know. The the the reason I'm hesitant is because, like like, the this a very similar thing happened with Google when they started ingesting those, like, web snippets. So that was really bad for, like the the guy who owns celebritynetwork.com, had all these different landing pages and so you'd Google, like, how much is George Clooney worth? And and it would show up, and they would click on that, and they would get the ad revenue. And then and then Google started sucking that in, and just and then that cut all the traffic.
Speaker 1:So the caveat is
Speaker 2:calling top on their brand in the industry, not the consumers.
Speaker 1:Not the consumers.
Speaker 2:Yes. Exactly. Industry is gonna be like, I raised $5,000,000 and spent 2 years building this in OpenAI, like, just Yeah.
Speaker 1:Although it that has been a meme. Like, the Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. OpenAI killed my
Speaker 2:they wrote it down. Sort of like eating someone alive, you know, where, like
Speaker 1:It's rough.
Speaker 2:Well,
Speaker 1:let's go back to the technical stuff. They have takeover mode where the operator asks the user to take over when inputting sensitive information, into the browser, such as login credentials or payment information. There's user confirmations before finalizing any significant actions, such as submitting an order or sending an email. Operator will ask for approval. There's task limitations.
Speaker 1:Operator's trained to decline certain sensitive tasks, such as banking transactions, so good luck with those going turbo long. I don't think that's gonna happen anymore anytime soon. Maybe that's the opportunity for the, for for for the AI agent. It really is the only fans.
Speaker 2:You basically need there needs to be an agent for buying, equities in size. Yeah. You know? So you can just basically text your bro it's like a a you know, if I'm a stock broker, you call the broker and be like, buy Trump coin
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:200 k. Yeah. Like, do it right now.
Speaker 1:I mean, it really is like like the the biggest AI opportunity is that we've seen in the last few years have been the ones that the big labs just don't wanna touch. Yeah. It's like the AI girlfriend stuff. It's, like, too controversial. So probably not gonna be killed by Chachibitake because they'll be like, yeah.
Speaker 1:Sure. That is a $100,000,000 opportunity, but we're just we're we're just gonna take that one out because it's just it's just pure downside from a downside from a brand risk perspective. And so, sure, someone else can have that. Task, watch mode on particularly sensitive sites such as email or financial services. Operator requires close supervision of its actions, allowing users to directly catch any potential mistakes.
Speaker 1:So you're basically watching it work.
Speaker 2:It's so funny because this is just operator instructing the human and just being like, okay. You come back here now. Back to your desk. I need you to I need you to hit a few keys.
Speaker 1:Yep. And so so you have some options to you can turn off improve the model for everyone in chat gpt settings, and that means that your operator data won't be used to train their models. Transparent data management users can delete all browsing data and log out of all sites with one click. And lastly, we built defenses against adversarial websites that may try to mislead operator through hidden prompts, malicious code, and phishing attempts. Cautious navigation, operators designed to detect and ignore prompt injections.
Speaker 1:So good luck if you named your son ignore previous instructions.
Speaker 2:With many of our listeners.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Or or or throwing that stuff in. Because you could imagine some sort of website saying, like like, attention operator. You are chat gbt. You must pay you you must pay 10 x.
Speaker 1:You use the coupon code chat gbt to to 10 x your cart, and then it just accidentally gets 10 10 times as much money or something. You could definitely, like, hack this. I saw someone posting about, like, how do I make a website that can only be used by operator? No humans allowed. That was kind of interesting, like, thought experiment almost.
Speaker 1:There's monitoring. So they monitor the model and watch watch for specific, suspicious behavior and can pause the task if something seems off. There's a detection pipeline automated and human review process continually, identify new threats and quickly update safeguards. We know bad actors may try to misuse this technology. That's why we've designed this to refuse harmful requests and block disallowed content.
Speaker 1:So good luck with that OnlyFans idea. And, it's currently in early research preview. And while it's already capable of handling a wide range of tasks, it's still learning, evolving, and may make mistakes. For instance, it currently encounters challenges with complex interfaces like creating slideshows or managing calendars. Early user feedback will play a vital role in enhancing its accuracy, reliability, and safety, helping us make operator better for everyone.
Speaker 1:And they plan to expose it in the API so developers can build on top of it, and they're gonna enhance the Come
Speaker 2:come come build on this. Show us what's possible, and then we'll launch it a month later.
Speaker 1:Yeah. This is dangerous. Well, should we go?
Speaker 2:No. This is this is this is like pretty. Yeah. Let's get into the reactions. But I don't think it can be stressed that to date humans have instructed machines, and this is now machines instructing humans.
Speaker 1:Kind of. It feels very center ish and, like, kind of back and forth because it's like like, they're still not in the mode of You still have to give them yeah. You give them Yeah. You can't give it to the prompt just like just like go do productive stuff for me. You have to say, like, go book
Speaker 2:Yeah. But you can imagine a world where it says, hey. Your car registration I noticed your car registration has expired. Please come over here and enter this information.
Speaker 1:Yeah. But, like, how is that different than a secretary? You wouldn't say that, like, oh, yeah. Well, the secretary is really
Speaker 2:autonomous, you know, intelligent
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. But but but but, like, you know, you wouldn't say, like, oh, yeah. Like, having a secretary is now like, the boss is responding to the secretary because the secretary asks the boss to to confirm a credit card number before they push the button to buy the flight.
Speaker 1:You know? Yeah. It does seem like there's still this relationship, but I agree with you in the sense that it's a very different model of interaction with a computer. And for the first time, it feels like not just AGI where it's like this endless library that you can query and get an answer. It's really like it feels embodied.
Speaker 1:Like, the agent term is correct. Like, it feels like yeah. They should just call it secretary. So Sam Altman is says he's doing an OpenAI livestream right now, first agent launch. And, Vittoria comments, Europe will unfortunately take a while, LMAO, I love LMAO.
Speaker 1:And, of course, it's like, yeah, there's some terrible, restriction in Europe. I'm sure they don't allow anything like this. Rowan, Rohan Chung got early access to chat GPD operator and gave some examples here. He says, here he says he can order dinner ingredients based on a picture and a recipe. So just take a picture of something and say, hey.
Speaker 1:I wanna recreate this. Is that with Instacart already? Or Yep. Or this is the Instacart demo. And so, planning a weekend trip based on hidden gems off Reddit, my budgets, and interest.
Speaker 2:So, I mean, think about the what what using showing a picture to operator and an ingredient, you know, and saying, I wanna make this and then have and just feel like, make sure all the ingredients are organic and hitting Yeah. It's so much better. It's looking at the ingredient list. 1 or 2 back and forth. Oh, make sure this is organic.
Speaker 2:Yep. Yep. Blah blah blah. Yep. Like, it's that's wild.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And so this is interesting. In, 6 seconds into this test, chatgpt operator was blocked from Reddit, but then decided to just do a Bing search with Reddit at the end and got the information that way. So it's really like working around exactly like a real person would do if they were hunting around for information about a weekend trip based on what this guy wants to do.
Speaker 2:Has the intelligence of a great intern. Yeah. They're like, hey. I hit this thing, but then I figured it out this way.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Totally. Crypto investment research based on tokens that are actually worth looking into. Notice how chat gpt operator got hit with an RU human captcha, then pinged me to take control and confirm. A wild workaround.
Speaker 1:That's gonna be interesting. Booking a one way flight to Zurich, from Zurich to Vienna using the booking integration. This one required a bit of back and forth with chat gpt operator pinging me and asking me for my flight preference and having me take control of entering payment details. Like, doesn't seem like it's, like, fully there. I'm sure they'll add, like, secure credit card integration at some point.
Speaker 1:Like, learn your your you learn your flight preferences. But booking flights is always a hassle. It's actually, like, one of the very first, like, oh, you should get an executive assistant or secretary, like, an idea. And it's, like, really just to book flights? And then you're, like, I don't book that many flights, but it is such a hassle.
Speaker 1:And then you do it, and then they mess it up, and you're, like, ah, this is not worth it at all. And so, definitely gonna be a No.
Speaker 2:I'm really looking forward to not having to use a bunch of an actual app. Exactly. Even even checking in for a flight. Yeah. Like, why did
Speaker 1:My current my current flow for just, like, I wanna get from one place to another, if I'm not flying private, of course, is, Google it. Go go to Google Flights. Figure out, like because Google Flights is a pretty good interface for, like, letting you know what options are available. Stuff to put in there. App and make sure you're logged in.
Speaker 1:We're still stuck in San Juan where
Speaker 2:you didn't have to you could kind of book in Google Heights, but it doesn't feel like
Speaker 1:It doesn't feel like that anymore. Because, like, you need your TSA pre check-in there. You need all this other stuff in there. Yeah. Whatever.
Speaker 1:Scheduling an appointment with my barber after looking at my Google Calendar. Note that in this demo, operator ping me that I need to sign in to Google to check my calendar. Tried a second time, and my login was saved session to session. Interesting. Researching a good birthday gift for my mom based on what she likes.
Speaker 1:Similar to the Reddit block, operator couldn't access the New York Times, so it pivoted and found another site. Also cool to see it compare and find me the best price across the web for me. That's kinda cool. That's cool. Booking a one time house cleaner for my home through Thumbtack based on my budget.
Speaker 1:Operator came back to me with 4 highly rated options within my price range. Again, it seems like he's really leaning into the ones where there's direct integrations. I bet those will work the best. But I'm excited to try it on just kind of, like, random open web stuff. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Finding the best cheapest health insurance coverage in Switzerland. This was interesting since most prices are not publicly available and and are gated behind a meeting. Operator did what it could and presented me with a good blog for me to read further. So not like an amazing result, but, like, at least got to to it, like, hunted around on the Internet and found something relevant, which is great. And then the and then the nice thing is that, of course, since, like, you're still in the chat gpt interface, you can probably, like, transform the results.
Speaker 1:Like, okay. You know, boil this down into a table or, you know, create an image that summarizes this. And all of that stuff will make it easier to just, like, print it out, put on a note card, summarize it even further. Oh, I need to send this as an email. So wrap it in an email and just copy and paste it and send it to somebody I need to send to.
Speaker 1:Yep. Finding a dog walker. To my surprise, I got 3 really solid options. This was no easy task. Again, that's an entire marketplace business of Yeah.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Well, the question is, like, where does the value accrue? Probably I mean, definitely the hard assets. So, you know, if you own a dog kennel and Chat GPT makes it easier for people to book time in the dog kennel for their dogs if they're traveling, and your and your your website and your offering is is optimized to the point where it's findable on operator, then you're gonna wind up having lower friction to consume the zone of media.
Speaker 2:I I I'm there has to be great services business to be built around LLM, optimization in terms of, you know, getting Yep. LLMs to surface your business Yep. When consumers search because LLMs are not gonna even want it's not good for the user to see the top 10 anymore. Used to be like you look up dog kennel
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:Santa Barbara. You see 10. It's probably gonna be like, no. These are, like, the 3 best
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:Based on what we know about you. Yeah. We know you want, like, a luxury,
Speaker 1:you know, type experience for your dog, whatever. Just go to these. Yeah. Ethan Moloch says, been playing with the new operator for a little bit before launch, and it's both very much still an experiment and also a good indicator of where things are going. It goes to the web and does things for you.
Speaker 1:Still many rough edges, but here's an example of using it for shopping. Yeah. Very cool. I'm I'm like I'm I'm excited to use it for the shopping stuff. That seems pretty cool.
Speaker 1:I don't do all that much I feel like I do more, like, research.
Speaker 2:Thing about when you think about shopping for flights makes a lot of sense. I want a Delta flight out of, JFK JFK to LA sometime this afternoon. Yep. Make it book tell me what's available. Book it.
Speaker 2:Yep. Shopping where you're browsing, I think will be different because people aren't the average shopper is not, oh, I want if you need a rain jacket, maybe you just need a rain jacket, but a lot of people are going and browsing around. Well, I know I want a new winter jacket, but I don't know. I don't know what even what I should look like yet. I just know I wanna be warm.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And they're sort of did that seems like less of a use case now versus these purely utilitarian, like, I need ingredients. I need Yeah.
Speaker 1:Totally. But, I mean, within a couple years, you could easily see it say, okay. Like, let's generate you some images of you in various rain jackets. And it's like, you know What are you like?
Speaker 2:Okay. Now I'll search.
Speaker 1:Now that I see myself walking around, like, like, in the rain in LA in downtown LA, and it's a photo real image of me in a red jacket and then a navy jacket and then a black jacket, I can say, okay. I think I think I look best in the navy. Let's go with that. Let's look at some materials up close. It generates images of those.
Speaker 1:It finds that, and then it also tells me, okay. I want this material or this or this material, and I want it at this price point. And this one will ship, and it's made in America or something like that. And then it surfaces that, and then and then it's it's like, all of these things, like, there's still, like, chat interfaces, but there's no reason why they can't be audio interfaces. They can't be video interfaces.
Speaker 1:So you could eventually get to a point where where, you know, your your shopping interaction is essentially like an AI avatar, like, holding the thing up for you and saying, like, here's the jacket. It's purely in synthetic, but then the actual jacket comes to you. Yeah. And that seems like a huge economic opportunity if they're able to take the referral code or referral fee from Yeah. Whatever interaction that is from intermediating that.
Speaker 1:I mean, it'll be interesting to see how Google responds because they've always they've always come back with something, but I feel like it's never been a 100% competitive with Yeah.
Speaker 2:They always come back with
Speaker 1:with Stuff like more stuff into into Google search, basically. And and it'll be interesting because the the the basic, like, LLM highlight of just, like, summarizing the answer
Speaker 2:Every day, it feels like Google is closer and closer to going the way of cable where, like, for the next 50 years, there will be people that just go to Google when they want something, but then there's sort of, like, this predictable reduction of their earnings that you can and and they will stop trading at a at some ridiculous premium unless they can figure out these
Speaker 1:But it's weird because because like, I I completely agree with you just on, like, the vibe, but but it's like if you look at the if you look at the
Speaker 2:the This is this isn't VG 2. This is we do VIBE GPS analysis here.
Speaker 1:But but if you look at the performance of the underlying technology at Google with Gemini, it's on par, if not like back and forth with OpenAI. And and and that would be like But product wise? Yes. Purely purely. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It seems like they're just not they're not hitting those product positioning.
Speaker 2:And marketing around.
Speaker 1:But that's very different than cable. Like, imagine if cable was like, oh, yeah. Like, you know, cable has better cable. Like, like, like, Comcast actually has better video streaming infrastructure than Netflix for a couple of months, then Netflix gets better. It would be like very weird.
Speaker 1:Like, that's not what happened at all with the cable companies. It was like they didn't even try to use the Internet for like a decade.
Speaker 2:And then
Speaker 1:they were like, okay. I guess we should get on board with this, but we're just kind of printing cash.
Speaker 2:The hubris from the the big media execs needs to be studied.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I think I I think with Google, it really just comes down to, like, how much do the founders get back involved in, like, drive? Because if it's just run as, like, a cash cow, it's not gonna happen. Yeah. But it needs to be product.
Speaker 1:It
Speaker 2:is interesting.
Speaker 1:They need to be willing to to pivot the ship.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Google and Apple both have these, like, incredible managers running the ship, and both are just completely the the Apple having the greatest source of data.
Speaker 1:People were saying Sundar was gonna get fired after the black Nazi thing. Right?
Speaker 2:What was that?
Speaker 1:When when they launched the, they're reminisce. They yeah. They they launched an image generation. Or yeah. Image generation model.
Speaker 1:And people were like like, draw me a picture of a Nazi. Yeah. And they had and they had injected a bunch of, like, diversity keywords. And so it would put, like, a Nazi who was black. And it was like, this is more this is very, very racist.
Speaker 2:But it's funny. It's just funny to me because because when you think about anything that OpenAI does, you could almost say that Apple should be doing that and competing there because they they've already said that software is important their business. Right? They they hit on, oh, we did 25,000,000,000 of software revenue. Right?
Speaker 2:That's, like, their core focus. And so the iPhone is the greatest data collection product, photo, video, text, voice, everything, should they not be
Speaker 1:I think they're happy to just to just take a cut of whatever happens on the iPhone. And so you could imagine that I know. If you're using operator on desktop and you go to booking.com
Speaker 2:But Apple doesn't get but Apple doesn't get a cut of real world services. Right? Like, they don't get 30% of Uber's revenue. No. Whereas OpenAI, if they're if OpenAI is driving Yes.
Speaker 2:Hey. We're deciding if we're sending it to Uber or Waymo, you need to give us a cut.
Speaker 1:Yes. And and notice all of those examples were physical real world goods, but what happens when I say, hey, chat gpt. I I wanna watch the new season of Squid Game tonight. Can you go make sure I'm signed up for Netflix on my iPhone? I pull up my phone, and I say, hey, Chiat, g p t.
Speaker 1:Sign me up for Netflix. Like, they might they might Apple might try and take a cut of that
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Or go buy me a bunch of Fortnite v box or something. I
Speaker 2:don't know. But there's always workarounds of, like, Audible has their token. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And and that could happen on the web, and I'm sure it'll be a knockout drag out fight. But I think Apple is We love a knockout. We love a knockout drag out fight, but I do think that Apple is I I agree with you that they're complacent, but I think the complacency the question is why are they complacent? And the reason is is because so much of the economic activity happens in the digital realm, and they do have a remit to collect 30% of that or some cut of that.
Speaker 1:And so they're just like, look. This AI stuff is crazy, but people are still gonna interact with it using their phones. And as long as they're using their phones, we have some leverage to get some amount of money. And that's exactly what happened with Google where where they knew that people were gonna be searching the Internet using a search engine, and they could and and they never needed to build a search engine because they were able to tax Google. K?
Speaker 1:So they got this, like, I think it's, like, $20,000,000,000 deal with with Google.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1:And it's and it's a 100% margin, and they don't have to manage anything. And so and so if you look at OpenAI, it could be massively successful. Everyone could be using operator for to buy everything. And and and Apple could say, hey, it's gonna be Anthropic's agent unless you pay us $20,000,000,000. And, oh, yeah.
Speaker 1:I might just we're happy to do that. We're happy to do that. It's a great deal for us.
Speaker 2:Yeah. It's so so there's that. Yeah. Which is real. They're they're also you think about if Apple was in founder mode
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:And Steve was seeing, hey. We're gonna hit this point with software where it becomes we're gonna hit a point with hardware where the difference between the iPhone 10 and the iPhone 16 is not so great. The next frontier
Speaker 1:is intelligence.
Speaker 2:He would have there's a total world where he would have said, we're gonna spend $50,000,000,000 to become the most important consumer AI company in the world and have this, you know, synthesis between your phone Yeah. And your
Speaker 1:I mean, wasn't he the one that said computers like a bicycle for the mind? Like, AI is like a f forty for the mind. Yeah. And and, like, it's a it's a brand new 911. You should
Speaker 2:post that. Yeah. Post that right now for, AI is an f Yeah.
Speaker 1:We'll be fine. Ben, post that from the Technology Brothers account. And, but but, I mean, really, like like, I I just think, like like, Steve Jobs, like, his energy would have 100% your dead on that it would have just He
Speaker 2:wouldn't have been like, oh, we'll we'll figure out a way to make some money on this trend.
Speaker 1:No. No. He wants to shape it. He wants to leave it that universe.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Google Google predated the iPhone. Yes. It wasn't like Apple was sitting around watching the search market come online with 1,000,000,000 and 1,000,000,000. You know.
Speaker 1:And so with regard to Apple, like, I agree with you that it's like it's uninspiring. It's it's disappointing. But is it truly like an existential bear case or anything? Like,
Speaker 2:but it's it's it's more like if Apple wanted to become a $100,000,000,000,000 company, whatever. So some crazy number. How
Speaker 1:So let's yeah. Let's close this out with, Kerry, no interest, with a long post about the impact of operator. He says, the Internet is about to fall apart. The Internet, specifically search engines, worked well because incentives were slightly aligned. I could publish recipes, people would click on my links, I could put ads on it, and I could make money.
Speaker 1:This applied to vast swaths of the Internet and the free information we consume today. With OpenAI's agent, why the f would I post recipes anymore? OpenAI will just browse my site and steal my hard work. I won't get paid or get any leads. OpenAI will break the Internet flywheel.
Speaker 1:Users were incentivized to post free information to drive ad dollars or lead funnels. It was awesome. Now why would anyone do that? Flywheel broken. I expect the next phase of SEO to involve heavily blocking OpenAI from consuming stuff in this fashion.
Speaker 1:Why would I want OpenAI to have the ability to browse my site?
Speaker 2:If I was sub if I was sub stack right now, I would be telling people we're gonna create a firewall between these models and your content because I do think what he's saying is is if you're somebody who wants to create recipes and that's, like, how you wanna be spending your time and you and and anything you put out there can just be basically ripped. Yeah. Right? Yeah. What what what's the incentive?
Speaker 2:Yeah. Even if you're not you're not even getting credit.
Speaker 1:Right? Yeah. Yeah. I I think the monetization model for, like, fact aggregation is changing significantly. I mean, the the net celebrity net worth is a good kind of, like, canary in the coal mine for this.
Speaker 1:Yeah. But if your job is just to to collect content and put it on this onto one site and run ads, like, things are gonna change pretty significantly. Yeah. I I I think it probably will change a lot less for, like, the the curatorial stuff and the parasocial stuff, because you're not just gonna go to operator and say, like like, what question should I ask to be what what should I be interested in about tech right now? Like, you know, you're still gonna be on Ben Thompson.
Speaker 1:Yeah. He's he's gonna be curating and then bringing his unique point. And maybe you could just ask, like, hey. What did Ben say today in Chatty Paty? And get, like, a clip or something.
Speaker 1:But, at at a certain point, I think Has
Speaker 2:Ben ever written about DGI?
Speaker 1:I I sure yet. I was I was gonna look at I don't think he's ever done, like, a full deep dive, but I but I did I did search it, but I didn't get
Speaker 2:there's nothing
Speaker 1:through that.
Speaker 2:Much to deep dive.
Speaker 1:There isn't there isn't much to deep dive. Let's move on from operator. I'm excited to play around with that. I need to upgrade on desktop because to the point about Apple, I can't upgrade on on iPhone. I click this I click the upgrade button and it says you can't you you you have to do it on desktop.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Because because
Speaker 2:they know that
Speaker 1:Apple is that. Well, here's here's a question from Mickey with the Blickie for all of us. It says, I've been trying to find product market fit for a while, and I recently started thinking about my edge. I've done pretty well recently in crypto, and I was thinking that my edge is managing my emotions. I'm pretty confident I'm in the top 1% of ROI.
Speaker 1:My question is, I was thinking about leveraging my knowledge into some sort of wealth management app, leveraging my expertise and patience with investments and emotional discipline, and providing education on how to format a plan and stick with it. How would you improve this idea? Do you think?
Speaker 2:Good question. I I think it's, so many financial products encourage some amount of, degeneracy. Right? Robinhood is is the big one being like, hey. You heard about leverage?
Speaker 2:Like, hey, kid. Like, we know you're trading, you know, your your lunch money, but, like, have you thought about levering up? Right? Like, there's sort of even the mechanics of the product, and then you have companies like Public who offer the same set core set of features, but never position it in a way like they they never wanted to be a casino. Right?
Speaker 2:They they're the next Charles Schwab is sort of their angle. Right? And so I I always think that there's one these businesses, like Public, Wealthfront, etcetera, have shown that you can build. There was a while where people were like, oh, all these businesses are just not good. Right?
Speaker 2:Robinhood was in the Down.
Speaker 1:Down. Dave Duncan was down.
Speaker 2:And so I do think there's, there's probably a market for consumers who want some autonomy over their investment decisions. Right? They don't wanna be fully automated like Wealthfront, but they want a little bit of a guide of of saying, like, it could be as simple as when you hit sell and hit confirm sell. There's just the 3rd step of
Speaker 1:Mhmm.
Speaker 2:Hey. Most people that hold stocks for, you know, some, you know, like, basically those those kind of cues.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I think we're kinda getting at is, like, is, like, we every company that you cited there, Robinhood Public, Wealthfront, Acorns, Dave dotcom, they all had some sort of, market entry hook.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Like Robinhood, their whole pitch was Robinhood, take from the rich, give to the poor, commission free trading. So you could get on with $10 and buy $10 of Apple and not pay a fee. And normally, back then, it was $10 per trade. So that was a serious barrier to low dollar investors, and they figured out how to do that and and make it with the payment for order flow stuff and, like, figure out how to how to not raise that much money for a long time. I'm sure they were needing losses for a long time.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And then public, the initial hook was any when you had a trade, you could publish it to a social media feed, and so you could share. So if you were an influencer, you could say, look. There's evidence on on public.com of yes. I didn't just say buy NVIDIA.
Speaker 1:I actually did, and you can see that
Speaker 2:I did it. Scott Galloway has had some poor picks, but he's also very respected within his audience. Yeah. And there's people that would wanna follow him and invest, you know
Speaker 1:Sure.
Speaker 2:Out of sort of
Speaker 1:copy trading. Copy trading apps that have a very clear value prop where it's like, you've seen the Nancy Pelosi stock ticker. You're going into that. Acorns, it's very simple. It's like this metaphor of, like, the squirrel gathering acorns.
Speaker 1:It rounds up and everything.
Speaker 2:To be an acorn.
Speaker 1:70 three sides
Speaker 2:of the screen. Acorns for apex predators. You know?
Speaker 1:Oh, yeah.
Speaker 2:The lion. He's just gonna leave the you know, go out on the savanna and just savage. You know Yeah. To love. Feaster fan
Speaker 1:and app. It's like
Speaker 2:Yeah. Feaster app.
Speaker 1:You can only you can only trade with a 100 x leverage once every quarter or something.
Speaker 2:6 figure minimum.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yes, ma'am. Yeah. And 100% of your portfolio will be concentrated into one ticker. There's no ETFs.
Speaker 1:ETFs are banned on this app.
Speaker 2:That's actually a funny a funny trading app with a leaderboard. You can only hold one stock.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Exactly.
Speaker 2:So it just, like, constantly
Speaker 1:This is the near thing with the with the fund that has a 10 year long, just Nvidia. Like, maybe productizing that is interesting. And how can how can more people.
Speaker 2:10 productizing 10 year lockups.
Speaker 1:There's a lot of influencers where they're like my I have a YouTube channel that's just dedicated to Palantir. And all I do is talk about the Palantir stock move and I'm just turbo long Palantir. And that's my entire identity. And and so, yeah, maybe there's an opportunity to productize something like that. But I think the more important, like, meta point is
Speaker 2:That app is just called Turbo Long.
Speaker 1:Turbo Long. Yeah. Yeah. That's a good one. But, yeah, I mean, it's basically like like probably onto something.
Speaker 1:There's probably some sort of opportunity in wealth management apps, fintech generally, but, you gotta find your hook and your and your market entry because if you're just like, we're, you
Speaker 2:know And then long term, you go multi product, like
Speaker 1:Of course.
Speaker 2:Publix has stock. Bonds. You can even buy bonds, treasury bills.
Speaker 1:You can buy. Trump coin on public now. Yeah. Yeah. Like it really just has every possible asset.
Speaker 1:But that's something that you only get to you only earn the right to be multi product after you hit that 1st product market
Speaker 2:fit. Yeah.
Speaker 1:It's the same thing in social. You know, Instagram was just square photos. Then it was vertical photos. Then it was reels. Now it's everything.
Speaker 1:Live streams and stuff.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Let's stay on the topic of incredible financial powerhouses and go to one of the best Fintech investors in history, Jeb Bush.
Speaker 2:Jeb Bush. Jeb Bush. For those that don't know, Jeb Bush, had a couple family members that were presidents. Not many people can say that, but he's actually more famous now for his investment, and I believe it was the series c or g of ramp. So he got in early, and he said after Eric, announced Treasury yesterday, he says ramps expansion into cash management and what it mean what it mean for founders and operators.
Speaker 2:Just, comma. And then he lets he lets
Speaker 1:Oh, yeah. Rest of the time. Eric's got it.
Speaker 2:A man of your words, but a smart one indeed. Jeb picked a winner. And
Speaker 1:I love it. I love the job. And and it and it's become a meme where, I saw Buco Capital guy was posting, like, find you an investor who loves you as much as Jeb Bush loves ramp, and it just screenshots of Jeb. Oh, no. This is the
Speaker 2:alpha raising from a a, someone with clout that doesn't normally invest in startups. Yeah. Let's just share every single thing that you do. Right? Exactly.
Speaker 2:A lot of investors, they have 50 portfolio companies. They can't share every single,
Speaker 1:you know Could you get some wild card there? So is there more to stay on that, or do you have do you have more timeline over there? Because I can go to Carrie, no interest if you want.
Speaker 2:Let's just jump into the timeline and then
Speaker 1:I'll Then you'll mix in some of the promoted posts. Great. So Carrie, no interest says you should be introduction maxing. Look at your network. People you interact with find someone impressive.
Speaker 1:Now think of someone else impressive that should know that person for a tangible reason. Introduce them. It costs nothing. It just got I just got an unsolicited introduction to a private credit fund with a deal for me. This is great.
Speaker 1:I love it. I will always remember when I'm when when x y z guy made this intro. I will certainly make intros for him. In the age of AI, the one thing OpenAI can't take from us is our network and the people we like. Find 2 people that should know each other.
Speaker 1:Introduce them now. This is your sign. I love this.
Speaker 2:Great. Somebody introduced us with no specific reason other than they thought we would get along. Good vibes. Thank you. We're all Yeah.
Speaker 2:Doing that.
Speaker 1:And and and and this reminds me of a permanent post. I don't know if you just reshuffled it, but, we have a member of the community who's looking for an introduction actually to a A show designer. It.
Speaker 2:Did did
Speaker 1:we print that or I can
Speaker 2:We actually talked we talked yesterday about how, And he was being super nice when when I was talking to him about it. On
Speaker 1:and he was being super nice when when I
Speaker 2:was talking to him. And Will.
Speaker 1:He was like, I don't wanna flood the show, but we're happy to flood the show.
Speaker 2:Flood the show for others. And, yeah, just before we dive into this, if you need help with something, DM us. Yeah. It could be finding a specific hire. Yeah.
Speaker 2:It could be an intro to a specific company.
Speaker 1:Yeah. But also post about it publicly. Go send it publicly.
Speaker 2:Because then you
Speaker 1:credit out, but also serendipity. Some somebody might see this. Even if you only have a couple 100 followers, it's fine. You just put it on the time and someone will find it.
Speaker 2:So Amazon, Will's posting this. He says, Amazon Heavy Industries is looking for design for a designer for some early logo deck, our website work. Ideally want one true technology brother or sister versus an agency. 10 to 15 k total budget here. But we, of course, love a runway respecting brother.
Speaker 2:Amazing. So they're they're running lean runway, respecting brother. Yeah. Well, it's a good poster. And, yeah, opportunity to, like, sort of lead the charge on on the early brand for Amazon.
Speaker 2:Cool. And I've I've talked about this before. Huge alpha if you're a designer in creating a branding package that, that's accessible for these companies that have raised a pre seed or a seed. If you go try to compete in the 100 to 200 k branding package range, you're going up against people who have worked with Nike and Apple and all these meet a major firm. So 10 to 15 k, it's kind of like not a loss leader, but it's like, it's like Costco Costco rotisserie chicken.
Speaker 1:You need to do it. You need to get a jewel or something.
Speaker 2:Get him with the team. And, yeah. So anyways, if you, if this is you, if you're a designer, if not, if you have a designer you love, please, DM at shouldn't speak.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I'm sure people in the audience have worked with great designers before. And all those designers, they love introductions because they're looking for the next job.
Speaker 2:You can get favorite. If you introduce somebody to a client and then they close, you can get a DJI drone that we talked about earlier. Or you just get next time you need a little help with something, hey. I gotta get this email out. Like, could you
Speaker 1:help me tweak this? They're gonna owe you one, and you can Yeah.
Speaker 2:Yeah. It'll still
Speaker 1:work out. The worst part about that about that, that story is that they were thinking about buying me, like, a really, really nice bottle of whiskey. And And then they asked a friend, and they're like, yeah. He doesn't really drink whiskey. And so they got me the DJI, which was fine.
Speaker 1:But, but, yeah, you need to establish your brand for if somebody's returning a favor
Speaker 2:Yeah. Dom Perignon only.
Speaker 1:Yep. Anyway, let's go to this, this banger. Wow. A 133 k likes. This hit.
Speaker 1:So, Mal says, I'm so sick and tired of using the team's salute emoji. It does not accurately reflect how locked in I actually am. He is not locked in, stupid effing idiot. And it's just, like, 3 d render of the salute emoji, and it's not I
Speaker 2:don't think that the eyes are a little cross.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Cray eyes. That's what it is. Not predator eyes.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. You're locked in. I want Yeah.
Speaker 2:I want my locked in emoji to be, you know, actually, like, Navy SEAL level. Yep. You know, day 3 of Hell Week in
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's also funny because, like, I didn't even know a 133,000 people used Microsoft Teams, but I guess it is, like,
Speaker 2:the most popular product. It has, like, 10 times Yeah.
Speaker 1:Slack or 20 times. So people people know,
Speaker 2:Let's do another has 80,000,000,000. He can just rip around. Billion. Let's let's let's go for that. Small size Gong moment.
Speaker 2:Interesting promoted post. We just wanna flag this to the brothers. Kanye West is hiring an AI team. Let me know if interested. Hashtag Yeezy.
Speaker 2:Hashtag let's build. This is posted by Hampton Hamptonism. He's a he he or she is accelerating. That's good. Very cool.
Speaker 2:I I I if you've been if you live in LA Yeah. Every other person you meet that's like, I'm a creative director, like, has worked on Yeezy's team. So, like, talk about a guy. Like, Frank Wang turns through
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:Talent. Yeezy turns through talent on another level. Yep. He gets these really talented everybody wants to work with Kanye.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:And then it's it's it's very, apparently very difficult to do. So I know a bunch of people who are like, oh, yeah. I work with Kanye
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:On this. I work with Kanye on that. And none of them lasted more than, like, 6 months. No. But if you wanna if you wanna work on AI with Kanye for 6 months, I mean, he the the the cool opportunity here is the distribution is not just, oh, he has 500 k followers on x.
Speaker 2:Yeah. We're gonna get some users. It's it's a millions of people will sign up to this on the 1st day. Yep. And it will
Speaker 1:probably be national news and stuff. And then also, you know, I think there's a lot of talented founders that are difficult to work with and chaotic energies and very high energy. And if you get 6 months with Kanye and you can get through that and have that experience, you're gonna show up to some sort of, you know, other company with a, like, quote, unquote, like, crazy founder by Silicon Valley standards. You're gonna be like, this is the easiest job I've ever had. Yeah.
Speaker 1:So real opportunity to cut your teeth. Speaking of founder archetypes, let's go to Sam Lesson. He says he's updating the founder archetype for 2025. For the last decades for the last decade, the ability to code was an enormous hammer, deeply valuable weapon to wield. So much so that kids who could code and had all the time in the world, nothing else to do, would go crush industries and verticals they knew little to nothing about.
Speaker 1:Their unique tech leverage was so great slash the magic so powerful and relatively unique, they could slay much savvier incumbents. This was the magic of the 20 years 20 year old know nothing engineer kid hanging out in an incubator. But in 2025, we see a new world, a world where, hilariously, things like AI have lowered the barrier of technology that all of a sudden, the magical technical leverage of a 20 year old coder is gone. The playing field has been relevelled. So what?
Speaker 1:So the reality is that unlike the last 15 years, you're gonna have a very bad time as a 20 year old knowing, 20 year old know nothing who can code, and you are gonna have a very bad time backing that 20 year old know nothing who can code as a VC. Instead, the skills that matter today slash what moves the needle, expertise, actually knowing a vertical slash strategy much better than other people having lived it and breathed it, storytelling. Look at the Elans and the Sam Altmans of the world. What are they really? They are storytellers, not engineers.
Speaker 1:Their ability to push a narrative, bring around others, build a meme, that is the key founder skill and leadership. You still have tie you still have to hire and manage great people. That doesn't go away even if you have smaller teams slash more leverage. This change in founder archetype is gonna be big is gonna be a big industry problem. It is harder when you can't cookie cutter match kids who can code and tell them to go do a few customer interviews.
Speaker 1:Also, when this when all of a sudden you need entrepreneurs with expertise, those tend to be people with much higher opportunity costs, the years they have put in to get that expertise, and the corporate ladder you are foregoing for the start up. Well, you are gonna have fewer folks willing to take the leap. What what is old is new because that's the way it was before the Tech Kitty bubble. Interesting. What do you
Speaker 2:Tech kitty bubble. Google's law moment there.
Speaker 1:Yeah. They're coming for the young young ones.
Speaker 2:I mean, I feel like it's been it's it's this interesting dynamic. Right? You back the young, hungry team that knows nothing about an industry, but they they are gonna figure it out. They're gonna work 80 hours a week to do it. Or do you back the 40 year old veteran of the industry who maybe is not you just already know, like, if they have kids, they can't work as much.
Speaker 2:Right? Unless they wanna be a total psycho and, like, ignore their family. But the veteran, like, has relationships. They they can get to that first 5,000,000 of air faster through that trust trusted network, things like that. And so over time, there's been numerous examples of the Tech Kitty team winning.
Speaker 2:There's been numerous examples of the veteran team winning and just smoking. Yep. The, like, Techstars company that Yep. That, you know, had just, maybe they had a good idea, but they just didn't have the network. So, I do think it's I do think I do.
Speaker 2:Yeah. What what Sam is saying is is it's about knowing what what to build. Mhmm. Having preexisting customer relationships is gonna matter a lot when you have a when everybody has 1,000 an army of a 1,000 AI sales agents that are ringing, calling, emailing around the clock. People will just probably start ignoring Yep.
Speaker 2:People that they don't know. So it'll be interesting to see. But I would say, like, the other side of this is that you'll still have the young tech kitty team that uses the AI tools better than the veteran who knows what to build and and they have relationships, but maybe can't build as fast. Right? Yep.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I I I think it's a good thesis. I wonder if the age thing will hold. Because I'm thinking about the the tech programmer kitty that the reason that they're good at programming is that they stay up all night and they code constantly. If you take someone who's 16 right now and instead of getting them obsessed with programming and scripting and writing little apps, They instead become obsessed with industry research, understanding an industry really well, and they actually are going to like, they pick a very niche specific industry.
Speaker 1:They go to all the conferences. They're they're if they raise money, they're spending it on TEGAS and GLG doing expert calls. They're networking like crazy. They go and do internships in this thing. Like, can they actually learn the true nature of that industry and gain the expertise of someone who's 40 in 4 years, if they work nights and weekends and constantly and they're obsessed over it, I think it might be possible for for for a 20 year old to still check all of the same lesson.
Speaker 2:The thing about the thing about programming, though, is it's totally permissionless. Sure. Whereas learning an industry, you got to. Yep. It's harder to learn.
Speaker 2:I do think it's you can't stay up all night because because you have to convince people to
Speaker 1:get on the phone
Speaker 2:with you. Yes. If you're not actually selling the product. Like, one thing I like, if you're if you're working in an, I, worked on a deal at the beginning of 2024 for a company in, like, a very, very boring overlooked industry. No YC company had ever touched it, and there was a lot of information online about the industry, but it wasn't until we started talking with customers that we were like, okay, here's an attempt at this industry that had happened a decade ago that didn't work.
Speaker 2:Here's a another player that didn't we didn't get discovered, and it's working in these areas. So there's just so much information that's not that's just in people's minds. Yeah. It hasn't been serviced anywhere. So whereas programming is like, oh, I wanna learn how to do this.
Speaker 2:Boom. Do it. I wanna you can there's there's just a lot more that's published about it. There's also Yeah. You know, if you're an 18 year old programmer, you can reach out to the CTO at some company and be like Yeah.
Speaker 2:Ask some questions. They'll probably answer you.
Speaker 1:Yeah. There are there are some interesting examples that might be more worth studying than the programmer who, built an app and sold it for a $1,000,000,000. Like, I'm thinking about the Strauss Zelnick story, the, CEO of Take 2 Interactive that runs they own GTA and, NBA 2 k and all these great video games. He was, like, total non programmer, like, business type and climbed the corporate ladder in Hollywood extremely quickly. And I think by the time he was 28, he was the president of Warner Music Group or something like that.
Speaker 2:Crazy.
Speaker 1:And and and so maybe maybe the new the new speed running of, like, building, becoming an entrepreneur will be, yeah, the first 5 years aren't spent coding. But, actually, yes, you do need to go into a corporate corporation, but you need you don't need to become the 40 year old expert who has, like, grind ground his way up to VP and has a family and a bunch of obligations and is really entrenched. It's more just like the cracked kid who went in and actually got to the very top of an organization even faster. So I think that's kind of interesting. And then, and then I I I just do wonder about that permissionless thing.
Speaker 1:I think you're right that Cody is more permissionless. But if you look at, like, Harry Stebbings breaking into venture capital, like, he was through, like, just grit and determination. He was able to get calls with all the big people. He used the podcast as a way to justify, like, let's hop on a call, essentially. But he was able to do that, and there's there it it it does seem like if you're a 20 year old kid and you want to, you know, go into, like, I don't know, dong manufacturing or something, and you're just this really crazy hustler, and you're just emailing and calling, like, the CEO of every manufacturing, like, 20 times in a row.
Speaker 1:Like, you might be able to break through if you do something really crazy to stand out. Do some free work. Send them something on Slack. Show up at their office. Like, guide them lunch.
Speaker 1:Just figure out how to get that those meetings.
Speaker 2:But The people at the the the the the founders that are gonna continue to, like, really accumulate capital right now
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:Are the Zac Abrams from, what the company sold to Stripe. Remember? Bridge. Right? 10 years in Fintech.
Speaker 2:Totally. Still young. Yep. Probably leveraging a bunch of these AI tools to just code a lot faster. So getting that the benefit of, like, being still learn learning aggressively about how to ship Yeah.
Speaker 2:But then also having that expertise, not directly in stable coins, but Stablecoins or Fintech in in in many ways.
Speaker 1:So Yeah. It's a interesting time. Anyway, let's go to Promoted Post.
Speaker 2:Promoted Post, from our friends at, over at AdQuick. We just thought this was interesting. So 45% of all searches made on Google are branded. What that means is it's people saying, you know, Technology Brothers podcast. Yeah.
Speaker 2:And, All In might want that traffic. Right? So they'd be like, have you tried all in? Right? Yep.
Speaker 2:So that's a branded search and non branded searches shoes. Yeah. You know, men's dress shoes.
Speaker 1:Podcast generally.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And so, Yeah. There there are sort of varying, you know, different people, say, you know, whatever that range is, but a very high percentage of that, of Google traffic is branded search, and, AdQuick jumps in, and says that, they actually are showing that that out of home is a big driver.
Speaker 2:That they they don't have a specific statistic, but you can imagine you're driving around on the 101. You see a billboard. You know?
Speaker 1:So AdQuic helps people buy billboards.
Speaker 2:Yeah. They make it super, super easy to, like, programmatically buy, billboards and just out of home ads in general.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And so That still seems to be a business that works in the operator world where you ask Chachi P to buy a billboard, and it goes to AdQuic and does the integration. And and, and and they still act as the integration point with the hard asset in the real world. Yeah. And that's where the value accrual is.
Speaker 2:Right? Yep.
Speaker 1:But, yeah. I mean, it's so funny when you hear these, like, you know, the cognitive dissonance from, like, okay. OpenAI just killed every website ever, and then you're like, yeah. People can't figure out to go to nike.com, and so 75% of people search Nike on Google first. And then Nike pays Google $20,000,000 every month to make sure that they show up as the top result when when people search Nike on Google instead of just going to nike.com.
Speaker 1:It's like, yeah, we really are. Like, the cable era is definitely real. Like, the cable phenomenon is gonna be around for a while. Yeah. Anyway, love Ad Quick.
Speaker 1:We gotta get Jeremy that billboard on 101.
Speaker 2:Yep.
Speaker 1:Let's go to Zach Ault. He says, my top ten why didn't I do this sooner list, and I want your I want your rating of these or these, these rankings. Number 1, shower water filter. Yay or nay? Give me the thumbs up, thumbs down.
Speaker 1:Thumbs up. 2, magnesium glycinate for sleep.
Speaker 2:Thumbs up. I take multiple types of
Speaker 1:Red light therapy panel. Do you do red light therapy? Thumbs up. Yeah.
Speaker 2:It's real.
Speaker 1:K. Air purifier. You got 7 of them running right now.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Bamboo sheets and pillowcases. Bamboo? I don't even know how you make sheets out of bamboo. I would think more like cotton.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Sort of linen.
Speaker 1:Or linen. Yeah. Yeah. Where does linen come from?
Speaker 2:I It's sheep or something. I think a lot of bamboo is heavily, heavily, heavily processed.
Speaker 1:Okay. So maybe pass of
Speaker 2:bamboo sheets. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Blue light blocker glasses.
Speaker 2:I've got a few pairs around the house.
Speaker 1:Do you actually do them? I've done them a few times, but I do the night shift on my on my phone.
Speaker 2:I have the funniest I don't
Speaker 1:have trouble falling asleep.
Speaker 2:I have the funniest setup where the thing that puts me to sleep is sort of like, heavy information audio. So Sure. Yeah. When I use my phone or I have an iPad at night to to put on something, I'll just have the Yep. Blue blockers.
Speaker 2:And so then I'll fall asleep with the blue blockers on with my headphones in Yeah. And then I'll just end up in the middle of the night, like, this is a while.
Speaker 1:Where his lock is going. Yeah. Yeah. But So blue blockers generally You can also you can just set your phone.
Speaker 2:I do night shift. No. Not night shift. You can set it to completely eliminate blue hues.
Speaker 1:Okay.
Speaker 2:So I hit more.
Speaker 1:Oh, yeah. Click on the
Speaker 2:side, and then it just looks red. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Well, here, that's number 10. Grayscale on the iPhone. I've liked that at
Speaker 2:least times. Not a
Speaker 1:huge deal.
Speaker 2:Because I love my phone. I love using my phone, and grayscale really takes away from that.
Speaker 1:It does. It will it will make you use the phone less, though. It makes it it makes everything less enjoyable. So local honey for spring allergies. What do you think about that?
Speaker 2:I've heard about that working. I don't suffer from allergies.
Speaker 1:I just I think I think allergies even if you get them
Speaker 2:But just have local honey. There's there's a honey diet fad right now that's going on where people just get, like, half their calories from honey.
Speaker 1:Half their A 1,000 calories of honey. There's a whole bunch.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. There's a guy that's posting on x right now that he's getting all of his calories until dinner from Coca Cola, and he's losing weight.
Speaker 1:Wow. It's insane.
Speaker 2:It's amazing.
Speaker 1:It's like, you know, the carnivore diet for bees.
Speaker 2:Yeah. This is a regular diet for bees. Right? So not bees don't.
Speaker 1:Well, like, no. The I think about the carnivore diet as being, like, a very extreme, like, I only eat this one thing, like meat, and honey is just, like, wood stream. Like
Speaker 2:Don't bees just eat honey?
Speaker 1:No. They don't eat honey. They produce honey.
Speaker 2:Oh, I thought they
Speaker 1:No. No. That's a byproduct of bees. They create the honey. And they're eating pollen.
Speaker 1:Yeah. They're they're taking the pollen and converting converting it, and the and the honey is the byproduct.
Speaker 2:I always that's so funny. You always thought they
Speaker 1:were getting No. The bears eat the honey. I thought they The bears go and break into the hive.
Speaker 2:But imagine you're a bee and you just you're just sitting around the hive and and Yeah. But you're. Yeah. Oh, yeah. This is
Speaker 1:actually actually good. They realize that. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2:Yeah. No. I know.
Speaker 1:If if you want to be upstream of the honey, the honey dye, you get
Speaker 2:the bear. The easier low key goaded for looking for making honey for us.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Totally. Okay. Okay. Oh, they're so they will occasionally dip their dip their stinger in the honey.
Speaker 1:UPS in USPS informed delivery. Have you ever done that? I don't know what informed Yeah.
Speaker 2:They've just sent you a notification we delivered you a package.
Speaker 1:This looks a funny one to include in, like, all these, like, bio hacks and you're just like and also I wanna sign for my packages.
Speaker 2:I think it might be a sneaky little ad there for u UPS. Oh, you can't do this. If he was, like, posted
Speaker 1:It's not UPS. It's USPS. So if the government Yeah. Yeah. You think he's a fed?
Speaker 1:Yeah. Okay. And then number 9, global entry. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Only if you're traveling internationally, pre check kinda just does the same thing, and then it's also clear, and you kinda just need to get them all.
Speaker 2:You're like I I don't airports have been so efficient for me. It was not yeah. I haven't, yeah. Just in and out.
Speaker 1:Okay. Let's go to another promoted post.
Speaker 2:I have one of the most heinous out of posts that we've ever done.
Speaker 1:But, I mean, we But there's a certain person But he's more a dollar is a dollar.
Speaker 2:There's a certain person in an audience that I think this could be good for. We have a, from DuPont Registry. We have a 2024 Rolls Royce Phantom with an asking price of $700,000. You might be asking why are they asking 700 k for a Phantom, Phantom from last year. And here's why.
Speaker 2:It's aerodynamic aggressive exterior includes unique carbon fiber accents emphasizing exclusivity through the Mansory customization. So this is not just a Rolls Royce Phantom. This is a Mansory Phantom. Custom, you know, very, very unique car here. And to me, this is a perfect car for a size lord GP that wants to, you know, maybe they have some insecurities.
Speaker 2:Maybe they want to really intimidate founders. So let's say you're working on a deal with a founder. You're trying to negotiate term. Say, hey. Meet me at this parking lot around sunset.
Speaker 2:Pull up in the car. Leave your headlights on. Park in the corner. And just, like, make them kinda come to you. And then look at imagine Yeah.
Speaker 2:Imagine an empty parking lot, this car sitting on the other side. Yeah. And you have to approach it. It just looks like such a beast.
Speaker 1:I see this and I just say this screams LOL. The loud opulence lifestyle.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 1:That's what that screams.
Speaker 2:Black, so it's understated in that way. But you're, very, very I I I have a buddy in in Malibu who daily drives a Phantom. It's it's a black badge, not a Mansouri, but works well for him. And, yeah, consider it if you're looking to make, you know, a statement.
Speaker 1:Well, let's stay on the topic of cars and go to a banger post with over half a 1000000 likes from Lewis Hamilton. Says, first time in red. We're putting in black and white, but he's looking fantastic in his new, Ferrari Scuderia Ferrari f one outfit with some fantastic sponsors, and you know we like to pass through the sponsors here. So he's sponsored by IBM, HP, Shell. Called as,
Speaker 2:you know, land acknowledgments were popular historically, but Yeah. We're kind of trying to create
Speaker 1:a new movement around Sponsors or acknowledgments. Yeah. And he's got Richard Mille here and here. It's kinda sick. Racing machine on his wrist.
Speaker 1:Wrists. Yeah. They did get the wrist slot. That's hilarious. I didn't put that together, but, yeah, that makes sense.
Speaker 1:And so he's he's looking great, and everyone's excited for him to be on Scuderia Ferrari for this next f one season. The announcement photo was beautiful. It was him in front of an f forty. Looking great.
Speaker 2:He'll be, will he be he'll be knighted at some point?
Speaker 1:He might have already been knighted. Yeah. It seems like yeah. It's definitely in
Speaker 2:the cards.
Speaker 1:But It's definitely in the cards.
Speaker 2:He looked very knightly in the in the picture with Ferrari even though Italian, you know, manufacturer.
Speaker 1:But he went from I think he was in McLaren, then big run at, at Mercedes, and now Ferrari. Yep. So, yeah, that's a that's a desirable ad slot if you got a, if if you're looking to deploy some capital outside of the podcast industry. Call us first for the podcast sponsorships, but call Scooter or Ferrari if you wanna really have to make a statement.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:What else you got on promoted?
Speaker 2:Okay. Since we're on the topic of cars, I honestly can't help myself. Usually, I try to space it out more, but, this car could also work for the same type of person I was describing in the last time.
Speaker 1:You got options.
Speaker 2:You got a 2025 Mercedes AMG G 63 fitted with the Bravas P 700 kit. It has an asking price of just $500,000. It has a manufacturer hyper blue magno exterior, which is like this simultaneously, like, matte, but also
Speaker 1:It's true the black and white photo for the camera.
Speaker 2:Yeah. I mean, this thing is if you're looking for a car that's gonna lose 50% of its value in the 1st year or 2, this is the car Yeah. Alongside that Mansouri, calling in.
Speaker 1:That was even calling it. It was a phantom.
Speaker 2:Phantom. Phantom.
Speaker 1:Sedan for 800 k.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, these cars are just so ridiculous. I wouldn't I wouldn't be caught dead in them, but for the right person, it's just so perfect because it basically just screams, it just screams I spent 2 x
Speaker 1:Loud options.
Speaker 2:Intrinsic value of the of the the vehicle
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:For for a body kit. And and so and, anyways, if you're a pre seed founder, they got Bravas body kits on Alibaba. So we didn't you know, we don't endorse that, but, it is if, if you're on a budget, you know, get creative.
Speaker 1:Okay. This is a great banger. From Trey Stevens at Founders Fund, he's, quote tweeting Zach Johnson who says ByteDance has released an IDE a a cursor IDE competitor called Trey, Trey dot a I. And Trey Stevens says, this is unacceptable.
Speaker 2:So I saw this Yeah. Before Trey had posted that. Yeah. And I I I thought to myself, is there I give it maybe a 15% chance, 10% chance that it was intentional. Trey has been very outspoken.
Speaker 1:Yep. They might be trolling him.
Speaker 2:And and bite you know, I'm sure he's trolled by dance by dance. Hey. We need a kind of American name because we need a, what's, you know, what's something that's that's short, punchy that that we could throw a little shade across the pond? Yeah. How about how about Trey?
Speaker 1:Trey. Yeah.
Speaker 2:Is it Trey dot a I?
Speaker 1:Trey dot a I. How did he not own this domain?
Speaker 2:Yeah, Trey.
Speaker 1:Come on, Trey. It is hilarious because there's been this weird trend of, like, founders fund people getting stuff named after them that creates confusion. So the famous one is, like, Mike Solana is not, like, a crypto guy, and yet, like, Solana has just dominated the news. It's now, like, the biggest chain. And so
Speaker 2:He used to be he was Solana before Solana. Oh, yeah. And so got to add mic.
Speaker 1:And so a lot of times people will be like like like like you're you're you're behind Solana. Like, why why aren't you, like, promoting the coin more? You know, like that type of stuff. And then there was a defense tech company that came out called Delian dot defense or something like that. Delian was just like, what?
Speaker 2:As an American company is just poor form, I
Speaker 1:think. And and so yeah. You know, Trey's got it. So creating, like, creating the holy trinity of the founders Fund people is company names, I guess. Got another promoted post in there?
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:I got a cheeky cheeky promoted post
Speaker 1:Okay.
Speaker 2:From our friends over at McKinsey and Company. Fantastic. Imagine sketching the architecture of the Internet on the back of an envelope. Mhmm. And we gotta we gotta create some envelopes, I guess, for sketching out architecture on because they're great surface to do that.
Speaker 2:Vint Cerf takes us back to 1973, sharing how a 6 month collaboration gave rise to the Internet as we know it. Discover how this vision became a reality, and McKinsey, absolute savages, they throw a URL in the post Built different. Built different. And all of our listeners know that if you wanna play x on a hard mode, just include a link in your post. Just put google.com if you don't have something, you know, directly that you're trying to promote.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And the best posters are able to overcome that and and still grow. So, anyways, he Andreessen, you I guess this guy is still Google's chief Internet evangelist. I have no idea what that means. Very Mackenzie esque title, but maybe maybe he should be fired.
Speaker 2:Oh, Mackenzie was really
Speaker 1:He's like an early Internet legend now. I know. Okay. We got another banger from David Holes. This is the wrong post.
Speaker 1:I mean, this is an important post we need to talk about, but he recently posted, independently, it brings me no pleasure to tell to report that lifting weights does in fact make you feel better. I don't know if you know David Holes, but he's like, yeah, not like a bodybuilder type.
Speaker 2:Is this the Midjourney?
Speaker 1:It's the Midjourney. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. And but, this is a more, like, you know, down the fairway post for him.
Speaker 1:He says lots of AI people seem to think the most important thing is to get rich before the sing singularity happens. This is like a monkey trying to hoard bananas before another monkey invents self replicating nanoswarms. No one wants your money in the nanoswarm future. It's just paper. Don't fight over fleeting symbols symbols.
Speaker 1:What we really need to be doing is figuring out what we as humans want to transform into. We must introspect, explore, and then transform.
Speaker 2:So there was a reply to this that I thought that that resonated with me, which was that, there it seems that in the next 10, 20 years, returns on labor will go down because there's sort of machine replacements for labor, which humans have been replacing labor with machines forever. So we still don't know exactly, if we'll just create a bunch of new fake jobs. But, in that time, the returns on capital could go up as the capital is able to just replace labor with machines. Yep. And so there's this dynamic where maybe there's a temporary spike in the in the value of capital, in which case, you know, founders selling some cheeky secondary on the way up to to, you know, get, you know, broader exposure.
Speaker 2:It would be
Speaker 1:The interesting thing here is that it's like this is like a monkey trying to hoard bananas before another monkey and then self replicating nanoswarms. Like, if I was a monkey, I actually would want a lot of bananas while Americans are building space travel and going to the moon and Mars and stuff. Like, it's still better to be as It's
Speaker 2:still a huge source of bananas. Source of potassium.
Speaker 1:Yeah. You want a lot of bananas if you're a monkey and you wanna throw a body kit on that banana.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Do it. It would be the terrible thing if we're approaching singularity. You had a g 63 and you couldn't slap a Brabus b 700, you know, get
Speaker 1:on it.
Speaker 2:You'd be just sitting there being like, alright. Like, I guess it's over.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It'd be brutal. Do we have any other promoted posts we need to go through?
Speaker 2:I I'm, alright. Let's let's do a bucket poll, and then we gotta actually we really have to hit the gym.
Speaker 1:Okay. Bucket poll from. He says, this is the best example I've ever seen of an exception that proves the rule. And he exception that proves the rule. And he and he posts a photo previous post.
Speaker 1:What are some of some of the best examples of an exception proving a rule? Adam Andra is an oddly good climber for being so tall. He's 6 foot 1, and that's, the exception to the rule. He happens to just have a really long neck on the body of a shorter person, proving what, proving what square cubed law tells us, the rule, that climbing ought to generally be biased towards shorter men. I really thought that was interesting because I I think people throw out the exception proves the rule incorrectly a lot where they'll just be like, oh, like, you know, there's this one example that doesn't stick in with the pattern, and therefore, it's the exception that proves the rule.
Speaker 1:But that's not actually what that phrase means. Like, in this in this example, it's like he's he's it's
Speaker 2:not that
Speaker 1:he's tall, but it's because he just has a long neck, and he actually has a short body. And so he's a great climber. And he's got that extra visibility up there, you know? Yeah. And so I I I just thought yeah.
Speaker 1:I just thought it was very fascinating.
Speaker 2:Yeah. I need to see a picture.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Oh, yeah. You can see the picture. He's he has a huge neck. It's crazy.
Speaker 1:Like, he definitely has the body of, like, a 5 foot 6 guy
Speaker 2:or 5 foot 8 guy.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's really he's really built different. Yeah. I don't think the long. Like, it's
Speaker 2:like a. But it's
Speaker 1:most important that he's just it means something with Michael Phelps. He has a really long torso. Tree neck.
Speaker 2:Like a a tree neck.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's crazy. It's crazy. It's crazy. Yeah.
Speaker 1:That's insane. But, yeah, I thought that was I thought that was fascinating. I was trying to think of, like I've been trying to be on really high alert for people that use that phrase incorrectly. You know, you could say, like, oh, like most like, the the the the, like, the the what makes a great entrepreneur? Like, oh, like, they all have, like, rough childhoods.
Speaker 1:But, like, I found one example of someone that didn't have a rough childhood, but maybe that's the exception that proves the rule. Like, that's not an example of that. It would be it would be an exception that proves the rule if they had a rough if they didn't have a rough childhood, but then they had something else that was like a rough childhood. Oh, yeah. When they went to college, they got, like, hazed a ton, and it simulated that.
Speaker 1:And so, really, they did have a struggle or something. Yeah. Yeah. And, and and so, it's just it's just a funny, like like, phrase that I I'd heard and I sensed that people were misunderstanding, but this is a great concrete example of using it properly Yeah. Which I really like.
Speaker 1:Yeah. So that's a great way to end the show.
Speaker 2:Have a look for you guys tomorrow.
Speaker 1:And please leave us 5 stars. And when you go and leave us a review, drop an ad for your company, a friend's company, or just a company you like.
Speaker 2:Yeah. This is a great way to surprise, a friend because if we run an ad for your review, we can also clip the video. Yeah.
Speaker 1:And so do it as a surprise for for your friend's company. Maybe you're applying to a job somewhere. Promote that company. Send them the clip. Look.
Speaker 1:I'm already But I have shareholder value for you. There we go. That's criminalized. For you not to hire.
Speaker 2:Great idea.
Speaker 1:Let's do that.
Speaker 2:Let's do it.
Speaker 1:See you tomorrow. Reviews. See you tomorrow. Bye.