Parsha and Chagim ideas from the rabbis of Kerem B'Yavneh
Enjoyed? Your feedback means a lot to us. Click here to email us: https://tinyurl.com/thanksEN
Hi this is being recorded on Monday ืื ืืืื ืขืจื ืฉืืช ืงืืืฉ ื ืฆืืื.
This is the ืืืจืฆืืื today of a dear friend I would say a ืชืืืื
ืืฉืจืื Person a ืืืื ืชืืจื ืืืื ืชืืจื he was constantly would come to ืืจืฅ
ืืฉืจืื would always sit in the ืฉืืขืืจ father of a ืชืืืื a great grandfather
of a ืชืืืื of ืชืืืืืื ืืืืงืื ืฆืื ืื ืืฉื ืืืื this is his ืืืจืฆืืื
I'd like to teach these ืืืจื ืชืืจื ืืขืืืื ื ืฉืืชื.
It's also the ืืืจืฆืืื of my brother-in-law ืื ืืื ืื ืืื ืืืื ืื ืืฆืืง a ืืจืืืฅ
ืชืืจื was a ืืฉืคืืข to multitudes of people ืืืืืจ ืืชืฉืืื I loved him ืื ืืื
ืฆืื ืื ืืื ืืืื ืื ืืฆืืง ื ืฉืื they should all have a ืขืืื ืื ืฉืื this
should be ืืขืืืื ื ืฉืืชื.
Okay well we're beginning we're moving straight forward into ืจืืฉ ืืฉื ื and this week's
ืคืจืฉื is the ultimate ืคืจืฉื which deals with this this is the ืคืจืฉื of
ืชืฉืืื.
This is the ืคืจืฉื as we read the ืคืกืืง in ืืืจืื ืืื ืคืกืืง ื'
ืืืื ืื ืืืื ืืืื ืื ืืืืจืื ืืืื ืืืจืื ืืืงืืื ืืฉืจ ื ืชืชื ืืคื ืื ืืืฉืืืช ืื
ืืืื ืืื ืืืืื ืืฉืจ ืืืืื ืืฉื ืืืงืื ืฉืื ืืฉืืช ืขื ืืฉื ืืืงืื ืืฉืืขืช ืืงืื
ืืื ืืฉืจ ืื ืื ืืฆืื ืืืื ืืชื ืืื ืื ืืื ืืืื ืืืื ื ืคืฉื.
See with this ืคืกืืง the ืจืื"ื on the ืคืจืฉื understands as being the source
of a ืืฆืืช ืขืฉื of doing ืชืฉืืื ืืฉืืช ืขื ืืฉื ืืืงืื.
It seems to be that almost all the ืจืืฉืื ืื disagree with the ืจืื"ื the
ืจืื"ื himself is bothered by the fact that it's not written ืืืฉืื ืฆืืืื it
seems to be a ืืฉืื ืืืืื so he says it means it's also a
ืฆืืืื and also an ืืืืื.
Yet the ืจืื"ื we know brings it ืืืืื in the ืคืจืง ืืืื he brings
it totally as an ืืืืื that God promises that we'll do ืชืฉืืื at the
end ืืฉืืช ืืฉืจ ืืฉืื ืืื ืืฉื ืืืงืื ืืช ืืืื etc.
This is a future there's no ืืฆืืช ืขืฉื at all.
Many ask why doesn't the ืจืื"ื count the ืชืฉืืื as a ืืฆืืช ืขืฉื?
The ืจืื"ื only writes when you do ืชืฉืืื there's a ืืฆืื of ืืืืื of
confessing orally.
Yet somehow what about the ืชืฉืืื?
He takes it for granted shouldn't isn't it a ืืฆืืช ืขืฉื?
The ื ืืืืื are full of it ืฉืืื ืืฉืจืื ืขื ืืฉื ืืืงืื etc.
endlessly about ืชืฉืืื as the ืจืื"ื elaborates over there in ืคืจืง ืืืื at the
end of ืคืจืง of ืชืฉืืื the end of ืืืืืช ืชืฉืืื.
And the answer obviously is the ืจืื"ื like all other ืจืืฉืื ืื see this ืคืกืืง
not as a ืืฆืื but as an ืืืืื.
And here the question lies how could it be that such a great important
pillar of our religion the fact that we can rectify our sins and we
are commanded to we should rectify our sins how would that not be a
ืืฆืื?
The answer lies obviously in the understanding the nature of ืชืฉืืื.
ืชืฉืืื means to return to return to what to what to what situation are
we talking about?
So let's start from ืืืฃ ืืืช.
We know that the ืจืื"ื writes in ืืืืืช ืชืฉืืื he writes what is the
first thing of ืชืฉืืื?
ืชืฉืืื you're supposed to be ืขืืื ืืช ืืืื ืืฉืื ืืื what's he supposed to
be doing?
So he's basically ืขืืื ืืช ืืืื.
What does it mean ืขืืืืช ืืืื?
It means he's supposed to say to God you know I'm never going to
do this again.
More than that ืืกืืจ ืืืืฉืืชื it's off his plate he's not even on his
agenda.
And then he has to say these things in verbalize primarily the ืชืฉืืื is
basically it should be off your plate not enough to refrain it's not even
an option.
And only that after you've come to a conclusion that it's not even an
option ืืกืืจ ืืืืฉืืชื only then is ืืขืื ืขืืื ืืืืข ืชืขืืืืืช then you must let
God be my witness that this stage of my commitment I really mean this
I mean to commit not to do this and I commit that this I'm
going to do everything I can to get this off my plate.
It's for me ืืฉืื ืืจืข is like bestiality.
Not even a ืชืืื.
This is the agenda of ืชืฉืืื,
not just say I'm sorry,
not just say I won't do it,
but it should not even be an option.
How does one get there?
And this is the primary issue of ืชืฉืืื.
The Rebbe writes in ืชื ืื in ืืืจืช ืืชืฉืืื,
he writes explicitly that there he writes ืืคืืจืฉ,
what is the idea of ืชืฉืืื?
ืฉืืืืืจ ืืืืื ืืื ืฉืื,
a total commitment,
ืืื ืืฉืื ืขืื ืืืกืื,
he will never return back to this stupidity.
One has to see it as a ืืืจ ืืกื,
something stupid,
something which makes no sense.
Not something I want to do but this is something which I perceive as
idiotic.
ืืืจืื ืืืืืืชื ืืชืืจื.
How could I possibly rebel in the ืืืืืช of ืืงืืืฉ ืืจืื ืืื?
ืืื ืืขืืืจ ืขืื ืืฆืืืช ืืืื ืืก ืืฉืืื.
How is it possible?
I will never,
but never,
transgress the will of the King.
ืื ืืืฆืืืช ืขืฉื ืื ืืืฆืืืช ืื ืชืขืฉื.
He says ืื ืขืืงืจ ืคืืจืืฉ ืืฉืื ืชืฉืืื,
the primary interpretation of ืชืฉืืื is ืืฉืื ืื ืืณ,
to return to God,
equals to return to His sovereignty.
ืืื ืืื ืืืื ื ืคืฉื,
with all his emotion and with all his sense of self.
If ืื means the emotion,
ื ืคืฉ means identity,
that you are totally identify yourself as a person which the idea of being
ืืืจื ืืืืืืชื ืฉื ืืงืืืฉ ืืจืื ืืื is beyond your radar screen.
ืืขืืืื,
ืืฉืื ืื ืืณ
ืืื ืืื ืืืื ื ืคืฉื ืืขืืืื,
to become His servant or actually slave,
ืืืฉืืืจ ืื ืืฆืืืชืื.
What does ืืฉืืืจ mean?
ืืฉืืืจ does not just mean to do the ืืฆืืืช.
That's ืืขืฉืืช.
And we always say ืืฉืืืจ ืืขืฉืืช ืืืงืืื.
The understanding of ืืฉืืืจ,
that's a ืืืจื in ืืืืืช.
The ืืืจื says,
it says 'ืืช ืฉืืชืืชื ืชืฉืืืจื ืืืฆืืืชื ืชืืจืื ืืืงืืฉื ืชืืจืื'.
You must heed my Sabbath and you must be in awe of my ืืงืืฉ.
And the ืืืจื says ืื ืฉืืช,
just as ืฉืืช,
ืื ืืืฉืืช ืืชื ืืจื,
you're not in awe or afraid of ืฉืืช,
but rather ืื ืฉืฆืืืื ืขืืื,
but rather of God who commanded on the ืฉืืช.
ืืฃ ืืงืืฉ,
also ืืงืืฉ,
ืื ืื ืืืงืืฉ ืืชื ืืจื,
you're not in awe or afraid of the ืืงืืฉ,
but rather ืื ืฉืฉืืื ืืชืืื,
He who resides in it is ืืงืืืฉ ืืจืื ืืื.
You look at this ืืืจื,
it's basically a ืชืืจืช ืืื ืื ืกืคืจื,
and you ask yourself where does it say anywhere there's a ืืฆืื of ืืจื
on ืฉืืช?
It says ืฉืืืจื on ืฉืืช.
It's true the ืืจืืื learns that there's a ืืืงืฉ of ืฉืืช to ืืจืืช ืืืงืืฉ,
and if there's a ืืฆืื of ืืืจื ืืงืืฉ,
there's also a ืืฆืื of ืืืจื ืฉืืช.
This is the ืชื ืื ืืจืืฉืืื in ืืืื which says explicitly that ืขื ืืืจืฅ ืืืจื
ืฉืืช ืขืืื.
Even an ืขื ืืืจืฅ,
a person which is not learned and therefore not meticulously observant because he simply
doesn't know,
but he,
the ืืืจื,
the ืืจืืช ืฉืืื,
the awe of God,
of ืฉืืช is upon him and we can trust him in certain ืืื ืื of
ืืืื.
But that's a ืืขืช ืืืื,
that's only a ืืจืืื.
ืืืขืฉื ืืืืื,
where do we find a ืืื of ืืจื on ืฉืืช?
What's the ืคืฉื in the ืืืจื?
The ืชืืจืืฅ is ืคืฉืื.
It says ืฉืืืจื.
What does ืฉืืืจื mean?
To have a sense of responsibility and being making doing everything possible to fulfill
that responsibility,
which will include not to transgress.
To have that sense of responsibility,
ืงืืืช ืขืื,
that's ืืจืื.
ืืจืื of ืืงืืืฉ ืืจืื ืืื or ืืจืื that you shouldn't ืืก ืืืืืื transgress the
ืืฆืื,
therefore you do everything possible to go far,
far,
far from it.
You know I remember I was a kid I smoked until the age of
thirty.
You know and every so often I would say to myself well,
just one,
you know?
No,
I know that one means thirty.
So you don't go near the one.
The old saying is if you're once burnt with hot water,
you're wary about lukewarm water.
That's called ืฉืืืจื.
Living with a sense of responsibility,
a sense of authority,
a sense of there's a ืืื ืืืื ืืืืืื ืขืื ืจืืื ืืืืื ืฉืืืขืช ืืื ืืขืฉืื
ืืกืคืจ ื ืืชืืื and you can't be ืืืจื ืืืืืืช.
So this is what the Rebbe writes.
What's ืชืฉืืื?
To make sure that there's no way you're going to be ืืืจื ืืืืืืช.
ืืฉืืืจ ืื ืืฆืืืชืื.
ืืขืืืื,
to be His ืขืื,
ืืฉืืืจ ืื ืืฆืืืชืื,
not enough to not to transgress or to fulfill.
but to live with that ืืืื ืจืืฉ.
And this is the ืคืกืืง ืื ืฉืืชืื ืืขืืื ืจืฉืข ืืจืื ืืืืฉ ืืื ืืืฉืืืชืื.
A person should leave the path that he's living on and a man of
iniquity should forget the thoughts that he has.
In other words,
ืชืฉืืื is a metamorphosis,
a changing of your way of life,
of your thought process.
It's gotta be off your plate.
There's no way I can be ืืืจื ืืืืืืช.
For that,
one has to be ืืงืื ืขืื ืืืืืช.
The basic reason of why we transgress or don't fulfill what we're fulfilling,
the basic reason why we engage in I would say selective halachic observance,
whatever community you're in,
we all suffer this problem,
is because we don't live with ืงืืืช ืขืื ืืืืืช ืฉืืื.
We do the ืืฆืืช,
we refrain from a lot of ืขืืืจืืช,
but it's got many reasons contributing to our actions.
The focal point is,
are we really living with a yoke of ืฉืืืจื,
are we living with ืงืืืช ืขืื ืืืืืช ืฉืืื?
And this is a ืืคืืจืฉืช ืกืคืจื,
brought down in the ืจืื"ื in ืคืจืฉืช ืืชืจื,
ืกืคืจ ืืืฆืืช,
ืืฆืื ื',
and the ืจืื"ื quotes it as follows:
let me find it here for a moment.
Yeah,
it says like this,
the ืคืกืืง says:
ืื ืื ื' ืืืืื,
and then it says:
ืื ืืืื ืื ืืืืื ืืืจืื ืขื ืคื ื.
And the question ืกืคืจื is asked,
why do we have to have again the ืื ืื ื' ืืืืื,
ืื ืืืื ืื ืืืืื ืืืจืื ืขื ืคื ื,
it's all the same thing.
So he says,
he quotes,
excuse me,
it's not a ืกืคืจื,
it's a ืืืืืชื in ืฉืืืช.
ืืคื ืฉืืื ืืืืจ ืื ืื ื' ืืืืื,
ืืฉื ืืืื ืฉื ืื ืก ืืืืื ื.
There was a king which conquered a city-state.
ืืืจื ืื ืขืืืื,
his servants told him,
ืืืืจ ืขืืื ื ืืืจืืช,
decree decrees,
set down the law,
tell them what to do and what to refrain from.
ืืืจ ืืื ืื,
no I can't do that yet.
ืืฉืืงืืื ืืืืืชื,
only after they accept my sovereignty,
they see me totally as their ืืื and they are my ืขืืืื,
at that stage ืืืืจ ืขืืืื ืืืจืืช,
then I will be able to legislate laws and decree their behaviors and their
ืืืฉืื and their ืืืืืจ and their ืืขืฉื.
ืฉืื ืืืืืชื ืืื ื ืืงืืืื,
because if they don't really predicate their actions and their thoughts by first accepting
the authority,
the ืืืืืช of ืืงืืืฉ ืืจืื ืืื,
that ืื ืื ื' ืืืืื,
only then will they be able to fulfill my ืืืจืืช.
ืื ืืืืืชื ืืื ื ืืงืืืืื ืืืจืืชื ืืื ืืงืืืืื?
How can you possibly expect them to fulfill my ืืืจืืช,
to be consistent in a religious behavior in ืืืฉืื,
ืืืืืจ,
ืืืขืฉื,
even to wish,
to will,
to want,
to aspire to do them in truth.
How do you dream of being able to do this if you don't make
sure you have ืงืืืช ืขืื ืืืืืช ืฉืืื?
It would seem to be the ultimate ืชืฉืืื is exactly that:
to walk away from ืืจืืื ืืืืืืช ืฉืืื,
or rather I would say it's not even ืืจืืื,
but to begin to be ืืงืื ืขืื ืืืืืช ืฉืืื.
And that is the ืขืืืื of ืจืืฉ ืืฉื ื,
ืงืืืช ืืืืืืช.
Do we actually sit,
look at ourselves in the mirror and say,
yes,
I am an ืขืื ื' and God is my sovereign,
and there's no,
I don't move my hands without him?
That's ืชืฉืืื.
ืืฉืื ืขื ื' ืืืืื,
until you stand in presence in front of God,
and that's how you live.
ืชืฉืืื is returning to the first ืจื"ื in ืฉืืืื ืขืจืื,
ืฉืืืชื ื' ืื ืืื ืชืืื.
That you stand in God's presence,
that you live with God awareness.
That's what ืชืฉืืื is.
So yes,
there's no specific commandment of returning to God,
because every walking away from God is a pre,
is walking away from ืงืืืช ืขืื ืืืืืช ืฉืืื.
The basic reason for you to do ืชืฉืืื,
because there's no way you should be living without ืงืืืช ืขืื.
Should you return to ืงืืืช,
you must return to ืงืืืช ืขืื because that's the ืคืกืืง ืื ืื ื' ืืืืื,
the basis of our total religion.
That's what this ืืืืืชื teaches us.
There's no specific ืืฆืื of returning,
of walking away from sin.
The ืืฆืื is walk away from the reason of sin.
Walk away from the reason of sin,
you must eradicate that and you must start from scratch if necessary.
I want to wish us all a ืืชืืื ืืืชืืื ืืืื.
Remember ืืชื ื ืฆืืื ืืืื ืืืื,
we stand one day in front of ืืงืืืฉ ืืจืื ืืื,
standing upright and straight,
we stand in front of ืืงืืืฉ ืืจืื ืืื.
ืจืืฉ ืืฉื ื is a day of ืฉืืืชื ื' ืืคื ื ืชืืื.
Have a ืืชืืื ืืืชืืื ืืืื,
ืืชื ืืืืชืื ืืื ืืฉืจ ืืื.
Take care.