S0677 - Meleches Shabbos - (Klal 30 Siman 5) - Tzad - 15 - Using an Animal to do a Melacha - 2_ Chayei Adam vs. Rambam - 1

What is Daily Dvar Halacha?

Rav Eliyahu Reingold, Rosh Kollel in the Yeshiva of Greater Washington, spent many years learning in the Telshe Yeshiva and Kollel where he was recognized as one of their foremost talmidim. He taught in the Telshe Mechina before coming to the Yeshiva of Greater Washington. He is a noted Baal Halacha and Baal Mussar, serving as a well-respected posek for the Yeshiva and community. Besides his responsibility in leading the Kollel, he delivers a high level shiur to advanced students, and provides many halacha shiurim throughout the year. His heartfelt weekly mussar shmuess in an inspiration to all.

This podcast is powered for free by Torahcasts.
Start your own forever free Torah podcast today at https://torahcasts.com/sign-up/ and share your Torah with the world.

Meleches Shabbos - Tzad 15 - Using an Animal to Perform Melacha 2 - Chayei
Adam vs Rambam 1 (Klal 30 Siman 5) S0677
We are continuing in siman 5, where the Chayei Adam is discussing the use of an animal (eg, a
dog) as part of the process of tzad. It is interesting to point out that the Chayei Adam presents
this case differently than its source in the Rambam. The Chayei Adam presents the case as the
dog tiring out the animal, but at the end, the person takes hold of the animal in order to actually
trap it. The potential argument was that if one accepts that the human is not responsible for the
action of the dog, once the animal is tired, the human did not do any melacha. Nevertheless, the
Chayei Adam’s conclusion was that the human is responsible for the entire scenario, and is
chayav for trapping it.
The Rambam’s presentation is where the dog not only tires out the animal, but also traps it. The
contributions of the human were to give the command to the dog, and to block any escape of
the animal. Thus, the human plays no active role in the trapping of the animal.
The Mishnah Berurah writes that if the human plays no active role at all, even in the preliminary
steps, it is only assur miderabanan. However, if the person chased the animal and the dog
captured it, or even if the human stood in the way and prevented the animal from escaping from
their dog, it is assur mideoraysa.
In other words, in the case of the Rambam, the dog eventually captured the animal, and the
person’s role was to tire the animal or block its escape. In the case of the Chayei Adam, the
human eventually captured the animal, and the person’s role was to tire the animal or block its
escape. The Nishmas Adam grapples with how the person can be chayav in the Rambam’s
case, since the dog was the one who performed the final melacha.
We will clarify this opinion of the Rambam, that one can be held responsible for melacha done
by their animal, in the upcoming shiur, be’ezras Hashem.
Summary
According to the Chayei Adam, if a dog tires out an animal or blocks its escape, and the human
is the one who captures it, it is assur mideoraysa. The Rambam holds that even in a case where
the animal the one who finished the capture, it is assur mideoraysa, provided that the person
was actively involved in the process. We will discuss this case further, be’ezras Hashem.