Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Born & Kepler is named after the mathematician and scientists Max Born and Johannes Kepler. This bilingual podcast, offered in both German and English, dives into the expansive world of Artificial Intelligence (AI), exploring its foundations, evolving technology trends, academic search, and its impact on businesses and society.
Born & Kepler will feature a diverse lineup of experts from academia, venture capital, private equity, journalism, entrepreneurship, CTOs, and policymakers. Each guest offers unique insights into how AI is reshaping their sectors and what we might expect in the future.
Our goal is to provide a deep understanding of the core principles and breakthroughs in AI, enabling you to stay updated with the latest advancements in AI technologies and how they are transforming industries. During our episodes, we will explore how AI is influencing business strategies, optimizing operations, and driving innovation. We will also explore the ethical, social, and regulatory aspects of AI in everyday life.
Hi, I’m Orbit, the narrator of Born & Kepler’s explainer series. Grab a coffee and lay back. In one of our recent episodes with Michael Kessler, we followed a company’s shift from a content-driven marketplace in the energy renovation space toward a vertical SaaS platform for trades—deep in operations, procurement, finance, mobility, and now automation and AI.
Beneath that story sits a question many companies face right now: how do you operationalize AI inside a practical, resource-constrained organization that has to deliver every day? Not as a headline, but as working reality.
That’s what I want to explore. Think of this as a quiet essay about the craft of introducing AI: how to structure ownership, choose use cases, manage data and reliability, handle risk and ethics, design customer experience, measure value, and grow maturity step by step. The core question is simple: how do you move from promise to practice without losing the plot?
Let’s start with a premise: AI is not a decorative feature. It is a capability that has to be integrated into:
- how teams work,
- how products are designed,
- how data flows,
- how outcomes are evaluated,
- and how you communicate honestly with customers and partners.
To make that concrete, I’ll move through a set of lenses: organizational design; choosing problems; data and reliability; risk and ethics; customer experience; economics; product patterns and security; the knowledge layer and industry specifics; a maturity roadmap; and some grounded scenarios and pitfalls.
1) Organizational design: who owns the work?
No company “has AI” just because it pays for licenses. You need structure around the work.
First, create safe, shared access. Give people approved tools. Explain privacy and security basics: what they may not paste into a prompt, what must be reviewed by a human, where data is stored. This avoids shadow usage and gives everyone a baseline.
Second, create a central enabling role. Think of an “AI operations architect” or “automation lead” who maps processes, co-designs internal automations, selects connectors, handles permissions, and maintains templates and playbooks. Their job is to make each new automation cheaper than the last.
Third, embed champions in key functions: support, sales ops, finance ops, field services. They know the messy reality and can tell you where automation helps and where it hurts. The combination of central enablement plus local ownership balances consistency with context.
Fourth, product-focused AI teams work inside product and engineering. They ship user-facing capabilities—draft generation, smart search, routing—and maintain reusable components. They are not an isolated lab; they serve shipping outcomes.
Finally, adjust expectations. If teams are supposed to learn new workflows, they need slack. One simple rule is: each sprint, ship at least one real improvement attempted with AI assistance. If it fails, fine—but it must be tried. And whenever you change cross-functional processes, treat it as change management: document the old way, the new way, who’s affected, what success looks like, and how to roll back.
AI lands in a sociotechnical system: people, data, workflows, and models arranged to do useful things safely. The scaffolding is unglamorous. It’s also the thing that makes everything else possible.
2) Choosing problems: a simple taxonomy
“Using AI” becomes real when you decide *what* to use it for. A lightweight taxonomy keeps you honest:
- Deterministic repetitive tasks: clear rules, stable inputs, low ambiguity. Moving data between systems, sending notifications on status changes, reconciling payments against references. These want workflow automation more than language models.
- Structured language tasks: predictable text built from known fields. Drafting follow-up emails, generating offer drafts from templates, summarizing threads for handoff, producing weekly digests. These benefit from models but stay anchored in structure.
- Open-ended language tasks: higher ambiguity and judgment. Triage calls, clarifying requirements across multiple messages, guiding users through complex workflows. Powerful, but they demand careful evaluation and fallbacks.
- Decision support: suggestions, not decisions. Ranking leads, proposing substitutions in procurement, flagging anomalies in payments, prioritizing tickets. Humans remain accountable; thresholds and overrides matter.
- Actuation: the system acts—approving refunds, scheduling crews, ordering materials, adjusting prices. This is the most sensitive layer and needs strict scopes, permissions, logs, and rollback.
A pragmatic starting sequence is:
- Begin with deterministic repetitive tasks that eat time every week.
- Layer in structured drafting where “good first drafts” are enough and humans edit.
- Treat open-ended tasks as pilots with clear guardrails and fast handoff to humans.
- Keep actuation narrow until you’ve proven stability and accuracy.
Offer generation and phone triage from the episode are perfect examples: frequent, costly in time, and amenable to structured drafts plus human review.
3) Data, tooling, and reliability: the quiet architecture
Flashy interfaces are rarely the bottleneck. Reliability is. Reliability depends on a few quiet choices.
You need a solid identity and access layer: knowing who the user is, what they can see, and what the system can do on their behalf. Many “AI risk” incidents are really identity and authorization problems.
You need a canonical data layer: one source of truth for customers, products, statuses, and pricing. Offer generation, procurement suggestions, and support routing only work if they pull from coherent, normalized data.
You need event instrumentation: logging triggers, inputs, model versions, outputs, confidence scores, and overrides. Without logs, you argue about anecdotes. With logs, you can evaluate, debug, and audit.
You need an evaluation harness: test sets for classification and generation, simple rubrics for quality, and periodic reviews. Think of it as unit tests and acceptance tests for language tasks.
You need thresholds and fallbacks: when confidence is low, escalate; when a rule is broken, send items to a “needs review” queue; when a conversation stalls, hand off to a human. Fallback is not a failure; it’s a design feature.
And you need cost controls: choosing smaller models where possible, trimming context sensibly, caching common calls, watching spend by workflow instead of just in aggregate.
When you put this together, the system looks very sober: safety from identity and permissions, consistency from canonical data, visibility from logs and tests, trust from thresholds and fallbacks, sustainability from cost controls. Tools sit in the middle. The architecture around them makes them usable.
4) Risk, ethics, and accountability
Every organization using automation carries a basic responsibility: don’t harm users, don’t misrepresent, don’t mishandle data.
That starts with transparency. If users are speaking with an automated agent, say so, clearly. Offer a path to a human. For voice, say what the agent can do and what it can’t.
Practice data minimization: only send models what they need. Avoid shipping sensitive fields just because it’s convenient. Be intentional about whether user data is used to improve models and under which conditions.
Define retention, access, and deletion policies. Provide admins with controls to remove items when required and users with a way to request their data. Keep a record of important decisions—inputs, model, output, and any human approval.
Be aware of bias. In some contexts, model outputs can disproportionately affect certain groups. Simple checks and escalation paths help. Balance your examples. Keep an eye on outcomes, not just averages.
For high-impact actions—money, contracts, legal commitments—keep a clearly responsible human role, at least until reliability is well established. Accountability should be legible.
This is less about abstract ethics debates and more about posture: clarity, minimization, recourse, and records.
5) Customer experience: dignity and flow
You can automate a conversation and still respect the user.
Scope clarity matters: an agent should state, in plain language, what it can help with and when it will transfer you. Guardrails matter: a few attempts at clarification are fine; endless loops are not. Tone matters: in voice, short prompts beat long speeches; in text, clear options beat dense paragraphs.
Context and continuity matter: with consent, systems should remember relevant history so users aren’t forced to repeat themselves. And escalation matters: when handing off to a human, include transcripts and extracted fields so the user doesn’t start from zero.
An after-hours voice agent that captures structured details, promises a human follow-up, and hands off cleanly in the morning is a simple example. It reduces pressure on support teams without pretending to solve everything.
6) Economics and measurement: reality over magic
Automation always comes back to economics and quality of life: time saved, errors reduced, stress lowered, opportunities unlocked.
Start with a baseline. Measure how long common tasks currently take: offer drafting, call handling, payment reconciliation, ticket routing. Do it on a representative sample.
Define a time horizon: revisit after one, three, and six months. Improvement often comes through iteration—better prompts, better templates, better data.
Track adoption explicitly: who uses the new tools, how often, and for which tasks. If a feature exists but sits unused, it doesn’t matter how clever it is.
Translate time saved into a conservative monetary value. Not every freed minute becomes new revenue; some becomes breathing space. Use a fraction when you model ROI. You’ll still see meaningful numbers without overselling.
Map costs: setup time, internal change effort, vendor costs. Aim for use cases with payback under a year, especially early. Success stories from these early wins will make later, more ambitious projects easier to justify.
7) Product patterns and security: making AI feel trustworthy
Certain patterns make AI features easier to trust:
- Draft mode by default for anything that carries commitments.
- Structured inputs behind the scenes: catalogs, clauses, and templates that generation has to respect.
- Exposed anchors: show the documents or data snippets that answers are based on.
- Compact interfaces: clear inputs, visible suggestions, a simple “accept or edit” path.
- Shadow mode before rollout: generate internally while humans remain in control, then compare.
Security and vendor risk sit just behind this. Pin model versions and upgrade deliberately. Sanitize retrieved content and be wary of prompt injection through knowledge bases. Understand where data is processed, what vendors may do with it, and how long it’s stored. Log with redaction so you can debug without leaking sensitive details. Have a small incident playbook ready.
None of this is glamorous, but it’s what keeps systems dependable.
8) The knowledge layer and industry patterns
Many AI features live or die based on the quality of your documentation. In the episode, content was central to the company’s early growth. The same discipline underpins retrieval-augmented systems.
You want content that is structured, scoped, owned, and maintained. Smaller, well-defined units are easier to retrieve and cite. Owners keep sections current. High-usage documents get more frequent review. International operations need consistent content across languages with explicit differences where they exist.
In trades and similar operational businesses, value clusters around procurement, finance ops, scheduling, and offer generation. Integrations and clean data are often the hard part. AI tends to amplify what’s already there: if the pipes are good, suggestions and drafts become powerful; if not, they just expose inconsistencies faster.
9) Maturity, pricing, and culture
A simple maturity model helps teams see where they are:
- Level 0: Ad hoc experiments.
- Level 1: Safe access and norms.
- Level 2: Deterministic automation with logging and champions.
- Level 3: Productized AI features with evaluation and fallbacks.
- Level 4: Narrow autonomy where reliability is proven.
- Level 5: AI woven into operating fabric and strategy.
Most organizations sit between Levels 1 and 3. The trick is not to declare that you’re at Level 5. It’s to make Level 2 solid and Level 3 disciplined.
Pricing should follow outcomes, not token counts. Bundle features around workflows—faster proposals, smoother triage, cleaner reconciliation—and offer proof periods with measurement. Keep your base product complete; AI should accelerate your users, not hold essential functionality hostage.
Culture is the quiet precondition: curiosity with discipline, shared language around concepts like thresholds and fallbacks, deep respect for domain expertise, and patience with uneven adoption.
10) Scenarios, pitfalls, and the middle path
A few grounded scenarios shape the picture:
- After-hours voice triage that captures details and hands off cleanly.
- Proposal drafting that builds from templates and catalogs with human review.
- Payment reconciliation where rules handle the bulk and AI assists on exceptions.
- Ticket routing where models classify and prioritize while humans stay in charge of edge cases.
And a few things *not* to do:
- Don’t skip process mapping and expect automation to fix chaos.
- Don’t overpromise; say clearly what the system can and cannot handle.
- Don’t ignore logs; without them, you only have stories.
- Don’t roll out broadly without a pilot.
- Don’t equate novelty with value.
- Don’t split ownership so widely that no one is responsible.
If you zoom out, the broader context is steady: cloud adoption in operational SMBs is rising, search and discovery patterns are evolving, regulation is slowly clarifying, and workers increasingly expect assistive tools as part of their everyday environment. None of this is sudden revolution. It rewards patient, integrated execution.
In the episode, the strongest thread was this quiet discipline: build content that answers real questions, move to cloud where it helps, integrate procurement and finance deeply, structure AI work with clear roles and champions, start where value is obvious—offers, workflows, support triage—and be transparent with customers.
That, to me, is the middle path. On one side, hype wants immediate transformation. On the other, cynicism wants to stand still. The middle path is pragmatic: choose use cases with real, measurable time savings; build a modest but solid architecture; set thresholds and fallbacks; test, ship, review, and iterate; treat your knowledge base as a product and your people as stewards of change; treat customers with clarity and respect.
Over time, this compounds. Workflows get smoother. Support gets quieter. Proposals get faster. Finance feels less like a daily firefight. Procurement becomes less messy. People get more time for judgment and craft. And the organization finds a rhythm: automation where rules suffice, assistance where language helps, human oversight where responsibility matters.
That is how you operationalize AI in a real business. Not by announcing that everything has changed, but by changing the next useful thing—carefully, transparently, and in service of the work.
I’m Orbit. Thanks for taking the time. Keep your systems legible, your promises modest, and your focus on human outcomes. The rest will follow, one quiet improvement at a time.