Shared Security Podcast

Surveillance pricing turns personal data, shopping history, location signals, loyalty programs, and AI-driven profiling into different prices or discounts for different people — often without consumers realizing their data has become the price tag.

Show Notes

This week on Shared Security, Tom and Scott dig into surveillance pricing: the use of personal data, behavioral profiles, shopping history, location signals, income assumptions, household information, and AI-driven targeting to decide what price or discount different people see for the same product.

The conversation connects New Jersey’s proposed grocery surveillance-pricing ban, Consumer Reports-style loophole concerns, loyalty-card data, and a creepy Papa John’s / Instacart / streaming-ad example into one listener-friendly question: when does ordinary dynamic pricing become personalized price discrimination based on what companies think they know about your life?

** Links mentioned on the show **

EPIC — New Jersey Legislature Passes Grocery Surveillance Pricing Ban https://epic.org/new-jersey-legislature-passes-grocery-surveillance-pricing-ban/

Schneier on Security — Papa Johns Surveillance-Based Advertising https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2026/07/papa-johns-surveillance-based-advertising.html

EFF — California’s Bill to Ban Surveillance Pricing https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/californias-bill-ban-surveillance-pricing

Scott's Digital Legacy Project https://securityperspectives.com/digital-legacy-tools/

** Watch this episode on YouTube **

[YOUTUBE URL]

** Become a Shared Security Supporter **

Get exclusive access to bonus episodes, listen to new episodes before they are released, receive a monthly shout-out on the show, and get a discount code for 15% off merch at the Shared Security store. Become a supporter today by going to our YouTube channel's membership section: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg9CCDIYkDDqwEZ3UYaxjnA/join

** Thank you to our sponsors! **

SLNT

Visit https://slnt.com to check out SLNT's amazing line of Faraday bags and other products built to protect your privacy. As a listener of this podcast you receive 10% off your order at checkout using discount code "sharedsecurity".

** Subscribe and follow the podcast **

Subscribe on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/SharedSecurityPodcast

Follow us on Bluesky: https://bsky.app/profile/sharedsecurity.bsky.social

Follow us on Mastodon: https://infosec.exchange/@sharedsecurity

Join us on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/SharedSecurityShow/

Visit our website: https://sharedsecurity.net

Subscribe on your favorite podcast app: https://sharedsecurity.net/subscribe

Sign-up for our email newsletter to receive updates about the podcast, contest announcements, and special offers from our sponsors: https://shared-security.beehiiv.com/subscribe

Leave us a rating and review: https://ratethispodcast.com/sharedsecurity

Contact us: https://sharedsecurity.net/contact

What is Shared Security Podcast?

Shared Security is the the longest-running cybersecurity and privacy podcast where industry veterans Tom Eston, Scott Wright, and Kevin Tackett break down the week’s security WTF moments, privacy fails, human mistakes, and “why is this still a problem?” stories — with humor, honesty, and hard-earned real-world experience. Whether you’re a security pro, a privacy advocate, or just here to hear Kevin yell about vendor nonsense, this podcast delivers insights you’ll actually use — and laughs you probably need. Real security talk from people who’ve lived it.

Welcome to the Shared Security Podcast, the longest running cybersecurity and privacy

show for actual humans.

No jargon, no hype, just honest analysis from industry veterans who've seen everything

and survived it.

Each week we break down the stories that matter, expose the nonsense that doesn't, and give

you the tools to stay safe in a world where everything is connected and nothing

is guaranteed.

This is Shared Security.

What if the price you see at the grocery store, on a delivery app, or an online ad is not

really the price, but it's your price?

So this week we're talking about surveillance pricing, the use of personal data, behavioral

profiles, location shopping history, income signals, household assumptions, and AI-driven

targeting to decide what price or discount different people see for the same product.

Now New Jersey just passed a bill aimed at banning grocery surveillance pricing.

Consumer Reports is warning about loopholes, and we've seen a Papa John's campaign that

used Instacart and streaming ad data to target people when they were likely running

low on groceries.

So this isn't just dynamic pricing in the airline ticket sense, it's pricing based on what companies

think they know about your life, when you're hungry, what your household needs, and maybe

how desperate you are for a pizza.

And joining me for this conversation is my co-host, Mr. Scott Wright.

Hey, I'm always desperate for a pizza, man.

You know, that is the one weakness I think most people have.

If you see a good pizza ad show up on your streaming service, right, and you happen to

be hungry and in the mood for pizza, what's the most likely thing you're going to do?

Yeah.

Could be streaming ads all day for pizza for me.

Yes.

So how are you doing, Scott?

Not bad, Tom.

How are you?

I'm great.

I'm great.

Too bad Kevin couldn't make it today, but this is now my second week at Secure Ideas.

Yes, you are a member of the Borg.

Well, I'll be sure to tell Kevin that we are the Borg, but yes, this is my second week

of being professionally evil.

You don't look any different.

I know.

I looked exactly the same.

I know.

Yeah.

Well, it's been great.

I've really enjoyed meeting the team and already digging into a lot of things in

the company, so I believe I'm leading the consulting team.

Awesome.

That's great.

Exciting.

I'm really happy to be working at Secure Ideas.

It's been great so far.

And yeah, so maybe next time.

I'll have to resist.

I know Kevin's been asking me over and over again, but I've been resisting.

Yes.

Yes.

Yes.

So maybe one day we'll start a Canadian office in Ottawa, right?

Well, sure.

Yeah.

Why not?

Yes.

Why not in the city that Fun forgot?

Anyway.

Oh, man.

Yeah.

I had to bring that up.

I thought it was something that you maybe just think of, but I can't remember this.

I thought this would be a good story for telling Tom about the city that Fun forgot.

Yes.

Yes.

Maybe next time.

But yeah, we're talking about surveillance pricing on this episode.

And first I wanted to start by, and I mentioned this in the intro, was this is different

than dynamic pricing that we hear about like with airlines, right?

They're obviously adjusting their price based on supply and demand and the season and all

of these things.

Or you go to Walmart, and I don't know if you've noticed, Scott, that they all have

these digital tags now.

These old price tags, yeah.

Yeah.

And that is essentially dynamic pricing where they can just change the price as they

see fit based on demand or based on other factors.

But that's not actually targeting you specifically.

No.

And that's where...

Interesting.

Just a quick little interesting side note about those little dynamic price tags.

I was actually commissioned like 10 years ago to do a risk assessment on those tags

because you can imagine people trying to hack them, right?

Yeah.

Anyone.

Side story.

Yeah.

I always think about hacking those things would be a little more difficult because

in the back end, they actually have rights because that's what you're scanning

the UPC code at checkouts, and so that has to match what's in the system.

Right.

But if a customer takes a picture of the price showing $3.99 for a car battery, right, $3.99,

and then you take that picture and you say, well, this is what it said on the tag, and

we have a lot of stores will honor what's shown on the tag.

That's a good point.

Yeah.

Going to a competitor, right?

And saying, hey, it was cheaper at Walmart, give me the price, and yeah, some people

try to do that.

All kinds of shenanigans.

Oh, yeah.

But what we're talking here is the surveillance pricing, which means a company or a third party

has information about you, and it is influencing the price that you pay, and it's getting

down to either you being in a certain demographic of people.

So I think there's been some examples, and we'll link some of these in the show

notes of past things like Tinder, the dating app.

They offered higher prices for older people than younger people.

Like, that's just a simple example of based on your demographics, they're going to have

some type of custom pricing for you.

But where it gets interesting is, and I like the Papa John's example, which was about

Instacart and the partnership they had with Instacart, and they would be getting

shopping data from Instacart of what people were purchasing, when they were

purchasing it, location information, and those types of things, and they had some

algorithms that could determine you might be hungry for a pizza during this time

based on your shopping history and through, I think it was like NBC Universal, the

streaming app, it would know you are watching based on your data and who

you are matching that data up and then serve you ads for pizza based on that data.

Yeah, I mean, it makes sense, especially in the streaming media world, because

they're constantly recommending stuff for you, so they have the algorithms to

decide how to present stuff to you based on your habits, right, from just

viewing, and it makes sense they could take different data about you and say,

well, instead of recommending certain content or shows to watch, let's put up

different ads for them. And that's, it almost, to me, starts to sound like the

minority report. Yeah, the movie is Tom Cruise going through the stores and

seeing all these ads flashing up. That's going to get annoying real fast,

right? Yeah, yeah, it is. And I think it just opens up a conversation

about you don't know what companies or who is doing this, right? So the

transactions you're making on a daily basis when you purchase products, I

mean, even just think about Amazon, right, like they could easily, I mean, 100%

are probably using doing some type of surveillance pricing. I mean, just

looking at the price of things and it's more than just, oh, hey, we see

that you've bought this thing five times in a row. Now, Amazon, when they're

right now, will tell you, hey, you should sign up for a subscription and we'll

give you a small discount, you know, because this is something you

reorder all the time. But there's nothing stopping them from taking that

further, you know? And I think there are certain, I guess, challenges or

obstacles to them doing this, you know, to the nth degree, because in a lot of

markets, you kind of have to publish a list price. But in cases where you've got

a loyalty program, for example, and you've signed up for things and you

might get extra points or what amounts to a discount, I think it's

probably much more workable that even for fixed price items, based on your

behavior, they could offer you a different amount of points and turn that

into a certain value. And all it comes down to is a value exchange, right? It's

your giving up your personal data about, you know, your habits and things

you like in exchange for reduced value or reduced costs on things you're

buying. So in a loyalty card sense, I don't think it's a real problem. I

think it's like you said earlier, it's a real capitalist model. There's no real

issue that where I think there becomes a huge issue is when it's done without

your knowledge or consent and you're tracking people's location data or, you

know, any other things that they might be doing inadvertently and not

knowing that they're being tracked in some way. And I can imagine, for

example, take a grocery store that buys data about their customers, you

know, if they know your address or your phone number, they can probably buy a

whole bunch of other data about you that will help them in some ways target you

or whatever. But what if they start gathering additional information

about you and then augment the two or combine the two together? Maybe

that's worth something for them to sell without your knowledge, right? So it

gets into a gray area for sure when you look at what they could be doing

with that data or collecting information about you without your knowledge.

Mobile apps are just part of everyday life now. Banking, healthcare,

shopping, entertainment, you name it. And with that comes a lot of trust

because users are putting their personal data directly into your app. But

here's the reality. Mobile apps are a growing target. A recent survey

found that 72% of organizations experienced a mobile app security

incident last year. And 92% say threats are only increasing. And

the way attackers are going after apps is pretty sophisticated.

They're reverse engineering them, modifying them and redistributing

fake versions through phishing campaigns, side loading and even

third party app stores. So from a user's perspective, everything

can look completely legitimate. That's why taking a proactive

approach to mobile app security really matters. You want to stay

ahead of these threats not react after the damage is done. This

is where Guard Square comes in. They provide advanced protection

for both Android and iOS apps, along with automated security

testing to catch vulnerabilities early and real time threat

monitoring. So you can actually see what's happening out there.

If your mobile app is critical to your business, and it

probably is, this is something worth paying attention to. You

can learn more at guard square.com. That's guard square.com.

Yeah, I 100% agree. And I think you mentioned just like

grocery stores and grocery pricing, I think is the, the big

area that we are seeing this right now. And in fact, that

some of the laws, like I mentioned, New Jersey and

California, and there's other states in the US, they're

trying to pass these types of laws banning surveillance

pricing or severely limiting it because any grocery stores out

of any type of shopping that you do, they encourage you to

sign up for these loyalty cards in the spirit of discounts,

right? Like, you're going to get these discounts if you give

us, you know, use your loyalty card. And I don't think we

often think about the power that the grocery store chains

have. And now, especially with AI, like they can now take all

of your data. And I mean, that's the the best thing

about AI, right, is they can correlate large data sets

together. And now if you imagine like the thousands and

thousands of customers that a big grocery store chain has, the

powerful data that they have about people shopping habits

when they shop what they purchase, you know, and I think

it's an opportunity and maybe this is some research that that

we could do is what are the privacy policies around these

loyalty cards, because I would be willing to bet that

there is probably some disclosure about I would hope so

that of how your data is being used and maybe what third

parties that data is being sent to or correlated or or

those things. And I'm not saying stop, you know, using

loyalty cards, grocery stores. I just think that it's an

area that this surveillance pricing is is kind of that's

what we're seeing the examples, the laws that are being

passed are kind of focused around that and the food

industry. And I think it's because, well, it's an

essential thing, right? People have to eat. And what a way

to increase your capitalistic, you know, market share, I

guess, is based on people's hunger.

Yeah, you know, I think from a practical point of view,

you know, like you said, we're not saying stop using

loyalty cards or whatever. But in a practical sense, you

probably if you do have a loyalty card, you know, maybe

we'll do this in a study at some point and publish some

interesting information about the policies of these

things. But, you know, when you when you realize that

you're using a program like that, there's probably a

privacy policy or maybe some privacy options, you know, in

your online account for that thing, you should go in and

have a look at and maybe there are things in there

that grant them the right to sell your data to other

people and you don't want that. So that's probably the

most practical bit of advice I can take out right now for you.

Yeah, and this this goes way back. I remember, you know,

Scott, we've we've probably talked about this on the

podcast. And I remember giving a talk, I think it was

way back in like 2012 2013 at Infosec World about just

the surveillance cameras that were first coming out and

how they could identify you and link you back to

Facebook, right, to pull your Facebook profile. And then

you would walk into these stores and you would all

of a sudden get a message on Facebook that, hey, thanks

for visiting. Here's 10% off your next purchase. And

you don't see a lot of that anymore. Like everything is

more like opt in. But I also it just makes me

wonder, like, we've been talking about this stuff

for years. Yeah. And I don't think it's gotten

any better. Really, I think maybe we're just a

little more used to it. We don't notice it as much. But

there's still I still get stories, people telling me

stories every month about being somewhere, having not

done any searches, but just in the room where they talked

about something or maybe they just drove down a street

where there was a certain vendor and all of a

sudden they're getting ads for that, you know, that

organization. So clearly the ad networks are walking a

fine line or maybe even in the gray area around

using behavioral information and advertising. And I

think that's kind of where this kind of you have to

focus and say, are these things do we want them to

be legal or not? Yeah, because there are extremes to

all of these things. And I think none of these

companies intentionally want to be creepy about it.

And I think that was, you know, it kind of in the

article that I think Bruce Schneier had linked

about the Papa John situation, but it still

comes across as creepy.

I don't even know if I buy, I'm gonna take

Kevin's thing. I don't know if I buy that

they're not trying to be creepy. I think in a lot

of cases, you know, the executive's compensation

depends on how they do the next month, right? So

that's right. We can scare a few people or

entice a few people with a new with a pizza. You

know, you can imagine ads, not only are they

being sort of served dynamically to you and

ad for a pizza, imagine a dynamic AI generated

video that comes on as an ad for you, like the

video is created for you dynamically, right,

rather than just selected from a library of ads.

And that's going to get really creepy. I don't know

how we're going to deal with that.

Well, I, I, yeah, I think you're right. I think

it is coming. And I think it is depending on

the services that you're using, that may

already be here. We just may not be noticing

it because it is on that borderline, not

creepy factor. And, but with AI now, I

could easily see a world, like you said, with

Minority Report, the movie, right? Like where

you're walking into a gap, I think, was that

scene and they're scanning your eyes and they

know all of your previous purchases. And, you

know, I mean, that is kind of the, the

capitalism utopia.

The merchants, I guess it is. Yeah. Yeah. So

we'll see where this goes. But I think our

advice for our listeners is, you know,

assume that these loyalty programs and

shopping apps, I mean, they are data

collection systems. Like at the end of the

day, they are still collecting data about

you and your shopping habits. And, and of

course, you may be getting discounts and

coupons for signing up for these things.

But just be aware that your data could

also be used from a surveillance pricing

perspective. And you may not know it,

right? But you may want to do your

own kind of research of like, you know,

compare prices, whether you're logged

into your app with your loyalty

program versus logged out to see what

pricing that the general public might get.

You might be surprised to see, right,

that there may be a difference in that

price. And you may be actually paying a

higher price depending on your data and

the program. It's something to just

check out. And the other thing I'd say

too is just, you know, continue to

reduce your location sharing within

your applications. You know, does

your loyalty app need access to your

location? Do you need to give it? How

many people are in your family and all

of this personal data, right? When you

sign up for these things. Be very

careful about that. I'm always a big

fan of just putting in like fake

information into those things. You

know, so I'm not giving away where I

really live or my real address or

things like that. But that's one

approach, right? Because we know we

can't stop all of this. And there

are places we legitimately want to

shop at. And we want to purchase

products from. And there's companies

we want to support. But it's just

something we need to be aware of that

the price could be changing depending

on who you are. It's a really

interesting, I think it's a great

time for this episode, just in terms

of opening people's eyes to, you

know, yeah, I remember the loyalty

program. And I, you know, I know

they're gathering my personal data,

but wow, I didn't know they're

doing this, right? So it's a

really good eye opener. Yeah, so

if you're listening this or

watching this episode on YouTube,

let us know. Like, have you

encountered a situation where you've

seen different pricing for stores or

online shopping or grocery stores and

use have suspected that surveillance

pricing was something that was

happening. We'd love to hear from you.

Love to hear your stories. So you

can either comment on YouTube or send

us an email feedback at shared

security dot net love to hear from

you. And we can we can mention that

in the next episode. Yeah. And if

while we're talking about feedback,

like to just put in a little bit of a

plug for the book I am working on

calls the digital legacy tree. And

as you can imagine, if you're

familiar with the concept of

digital legacy, it's you know, what

happens when you die and your all

your accounts, you know, go into

limbo, who has access to them,

et cetera. But it's more than

just your passwords and two factor

authentication. And as I do research

on this, it becomes really

intriguing that the number of

people I talked to who say, you

know, it's not just the password,

like I wish I knew how this person

lived their life, you know, what's

the context that this was used in.

And so that's the kind of stuff

that I'll be talking about. So I'm

interested in hearing anybody's

stories if they want to share an

anecdote anonymously or however

about situations where people

have passed away and it was hard

to either get in their accounts or

figure out what what to do with

them, you know, I have

personally actually last time I

pruned my bit warden, it was over a

thousand accounts I have. Yeah,

things right. And they're not all

going to be stuff that you want your

authorized decision maker after you

die to have to go through. So I think

it's another area where we need to

focus. So love to hear people's

feedback. Again, feedback at shared

security.net. Yeah, yeah. Thank

you for mentioning that, Scott.

And do you still have that page up?

I think we had a link to yes, I

do. Yeah, we'll link that in the

show notes for for our audience.

But if you want to see the great

important project that Scott is

working on with the book, you can

find out more information about

that through that link.

All right. Well, thanks everyone

for listening. And until next

time, stay safe, stay secure and

stay private. Thank you for

listening or watching. If you like

this episode, hit subscribe, share

it with your friends and

colleagues or jump into our

community at shared security net

slash supporter to keep the

conversation going. Thanks again

and we'll see you next week for

another episode of shared

security.