Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
TBPN is a live tech talk show hosted by John Coogan and Jordi Hays, streaming weekdays from 11–2 PT on X and YouTube, with full episodes posted to Spotify immediately after airing.
Described by The New York Times as “Silicon Valley’s newest obsession,” TBPN has interviewed Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Altman, Mark Cuban, and Satya Nadella. Diet TBPN delivers the best moments from each episode in under 30 minutes.
Big news in the fintech world, not related to to ramp actually, but Stripe, another, Founders Fund project. It's it's Founders Fund day. Stripe is offered to buy PayPal. This was rumored and on the timeline, on and off over the past year as, as PayPal has been a little beat up. We can pull up the five year chart.
Speaker 1:It's down over 80% since the pandemic highs. If you go back further, the twenty twenty to twenty twenty one era for PayPal was, like, sort of an an anomaly because of the big shift to ecommerce during the, the pandemic boom. But, things have not been looking good for the last five years. And so just a couple was it a couple months ago, Sheila Monat posted in February 2026. He posted a little a little question for the timeline.
Speaker 1:He said, so who's buying PayPal? He says, it has the opportunity of being one of the great distressed value opportunities in fintech history. It's down 85% at the time, still still generating $5,500,000,000 in free cash flow. This is a 50,000,000,000 company. We'll go through the PayPal, the the Stripe offer, which is at 53,000,000,000.
Speaker 1:But, you know, you're getting a 10% free cash flow yield. I'm on effect.
Speaker 2:Sorry. I'm still I'm still working through these these two sound.
Speaker 1:We got new ones. But if you think about it, it's like you have a $50,000,000,000 company printing 5,500,000,000 in free cash flow. You can use a lot to finance debt, obviously, which is what's proposed here. 400,000,000 consumer accounts. So lots of consumers have PayPal accounts, have Venmo accounts.
Speaker 1:Maybe they're not fully active, but they're ready to be engaged. It's a huge footprint and huge distribution mechanism. And they have bank info attached. That's difficult. You can't get that from many other consumer applications.
Speaker 1:That's sort of the white whale of consumer. How deep can you go in the KYC flow in the consumer bank relationship? You really know these customers, which is valuable for for for a potential buyer, like Stripe, in this case. So, checkout buttons are on millions of merchant sites, although that has been slowing, and and that's part of the reason why a change of ownership might make sense at this point. They also have this peer to peer brand with Venmo, which was bought by Brian Johnson, Braintree, and then sold to PayPal.
Speaker 1:Bull So, Schiele, the first company he calls out is Stripe. He says they have a lot of desirable assets for Stripe, a consumer facing checkout, account details for hundreds of millions of consumers that you could integrate into Stripe's checkout flow. And they have a consumer brand in Venmo. Apple would also be a potential buyer, says Schiele. Good complement to Apple Pay for e commerce penetration.
Speaker 1:They never got social payments going. Schiele says, those are the two logical options from a business value creation perspective, but he identifies the problem. He says, in both cases, Apple and Stripe, the culture fit makes them a non starter.
Speaker 2:I take it back. They actually did buy a BNPL platform Which one? That I've never heard of called Payd
Speaker 1:Okay. 2021
Speaker 2:for 2,700,000,000.
Speaker 3:Okay. So they so so they do
Speaker 1:have an asset there that they are, hopefully trying to grow. But prior
Speaker 2:to that, they had already built their own.
Speaker 1:Got it. So Shield calls out that CultureFit might be a problem with PayPal integrating into Stripe. PayPal is a, quote, sprawling legacy fintech with 25,000 employees. That's a huge company. Decades of technical debt, neither Stripe nor Apple would wanna absorb that.
Speaker 1:Although technical debt, you can clean it up. Coding agents, not too bad these days. Apple also might face big tech antitrust with this type of thing. That's good call out. And, yeah, you do have to you do have to wonder Stripe, incredible on the product side, on the innovation side, on the on the just building a fantastic massive $159,000,000,000 as of last tender offer business.
Speaker 1:But are they the are they the team to be the ruthless cost cutters if that's what it takes to turn PayPal around? That might be a different challenge culturally. Same thing for Apple. They're not this private equity firm that goes in and buys legacy assets and turns them around. So a little bit of a culture shift that I think Sheila's correct to call out.
Speaker 1:He also identifies Visa and Mastercard as potential buyers. He said they could both afford it and they've been creeping into merchant acquiring and checkout. Also, talked about that the big banks are now taking a shot across the bow of Visa and Mastercard with their own card network. So there's potential that Visa and Mastercard might want to expand into a different territory, although that's not what's playing out right now. But who knows what other bidders will come out of the woodwork now that Stripe has made this offer to buy PayPal for 53,000,000,000.
Speaker 1:So PayPal's checkout button placement is enormously valuable real estate for either Visa or Mastercard. The networks have been trying to move beyond interchange into direct merchant relationships and PayPal could accelerate that by years. I think they may be burned out on antitrust. Either network acquiring the largest independent online checkout provider would and should face brutal regulatory scrutiny, says Scheele. He goes on.
Speaker 1:Says, what about Elon? Elon co founded PayPal and always wanted it to be called X, so there's some poetry in it coming back under his fold as X. Of course, he is a shareholder, I believe. I think he was an angel investor, one of his very rare angel investments with Stripe.
Speaker 2:So Crazy.
Speaker 1:You know, he might be getting a slice of PayPal with
Speaker 2:this.
Speaker 1:Not too bad. His bandwidth is spread impossibly thin across Tesla, SpaceX, x AI. This is pre merger x politics and replying concerning to Post at 3AM. Never been a problem for Elon, he said, but you could have made the case. He was spread too thin before he started to acquire the last several companies too.
Speaker 1:Technical debt at PayPal is a big challenge that he knows. I would never count him out. I just don't see it, though. And then he says, in his opinion, Scheele says, JPMorgan makes the most sense. They've spent heavily on payments and acquisition, and an acquisition could get them closer to building a consumer super app alongside Chase.
Speaker 1:50,000,000,000 would be a huge acquisition even for them, but they could stomach it assuming they could get regulatory approval. Venmo gives them a P2P brand that they've never been able to build, especially among younger consumers. PayPal's branded checkout button sits on millions of merchant sites. Remember, didn't J. P.
Speaker 1:Morg is it J. P. Morgan that bought that company that Charlie Javas founded and then she went to jail or was accused of crimes because and that pitch for her company
Speaker 2:Consumer was facing.
Speaker 1:Consumer facing.
Speaker 2:They had a relationship with alleged Yeah. I guess, they they positioned yeah. They positioned it as having a lot of relationships
Speaker 1:With younger consumers, college students. Yeah. And so I think the deal came in like north of a $100,000,000, and then it was later alleged or discovered that those accounts were maybe generated programmatically. I I think this was the pre AI era. Now it's even easier if you need to generate a bunch of fake data.
Speaker 1:But don't do that because it's fraud.
Speaker 2:Yeah. The question is, like, Stripe makes so much sense
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:Because to be able to pull off an acquisition like this, to be able to get the the level of debt needed to do this, you need to have so much confidence that they're gonna actually be able to Mhmm. I'm I'm assuming they'll end up reducing headcount pretty dramatically. I'm assuming Stripe looks at this and says, hey, I don't think we need 25,000 people running Mhmm. This business. So who has the operational strength and know how to make PayPal run?
Speaker 2:If you could make PayPal even run half as well as as Stripe Mhmm. That's probably worth double Yeah. What it's currently
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:Totally. Worth. So, yeah. If you're if you're a lender here, I don't I don't see or a partner, I don't see that you can find a better partner than than Stripe on a deal like this, period.
Speaker 1:Stripe is a fun option. I agree with this. It's funny. This teal backed fintech company buying a teal founded company full circle. The first offer's already facing some pushback.
Speaker 1:Michael Burry, I believe, is a shareholder, and he posted on his Substack about why he's not selling at this current price. He thinks that, PayPal can get back to their previous share price from a year ago. But the basic structure of the deal is as follows. 53,000,000,000 for all of PayPal, $60.50 per share offered, 28% premium over yesterday's closing price, but it's a steep discount to last year's valuation. 50,000,000,000 has been committed in bank financing, and the Feet is reporting that PayPal has been reluctant to engage with the offer thus far.
Speaker 1:Stripe is much bigger than PayPal at this point. Also interesting, this offer was apparently sent over to PayPal weeks ago, maybe a full month ago based on the reporting, and it didn't leak. So whoever's working on this team, good job.
Speaker 2:Kept it public. They're taking it public. Enrique, Flores
Speaker 1:Yes. The CEO.
Speaker 2:CEO over at PayPal just got the gig. Mhmm. He had been over at HP. Yep. And you can imagine that he's, you know, took the job wanting to just basically be acquired in a short period of time.
Speaker 2:Exactly. I would imagine he wants to get credit for a proper Yeah. Turnaround here. Yeah. And so I think they're going public with this now in part to try to put pressure.
Speaker 1:So Stripe is partnering with private equity firm Advent International for the deal. They have a lot of deal making experience in fintech specifically. And I think they're gonna go $50.50 on the equity portion, but then there's a whole bunch of bank financing coming in. And they they will point in their offer to the fact that branded PayPal checkouts are slowing. There's fierce competition from Apple Pay, Shop Pay, Klarna.
Speaker 1:These are reasons to sell. PayPal will likely fall fire back saying, Hey, we just brought in a fresh CEO. We have a restructuring plan in place. We're executing against that. Once that happens, once we're successful, we will get back to the 70s for our share price, which we traded at just a year ago.
Speaker 1:So, yeah, maybe we're not gonna go back to the pandemic highs anytime soon, but this offer is just too low for right now. But we will see. Overall, I mean, Stripe has done an excellent job expanding into many adjacent markets. Atlas is a great example. And they've never cracked consumer, but also they've never really tried in my opinion.
Speaker 1:And so I think it'd be really awesome to watch this play out, see what they do with it. But it does seem like it it'll take a few more rounds of negotiation before anything fully materializes. Anyway, there is news out of OpenAI. The first consumer hardware device will reportedly be an AI companion speaker. According to Bloomberg, the device will be screenless and movable, designed to serve as a new kind of home computer for the AI era.
Speaker 1:And I believe Tyler has a mock up of what we think it would look like. I think I sent it to you. Did that make it into the timeline? Let's pull that up when we have a It will be able to answer questions, control smart home devices, play music, and tap into GPT's capabilities, but the bigger goal is for it to become increasingly personalized over time. OpenAI envisions it as an AI companion that gets to know its owner, understands their habits, it can even draw on personal information like email to provide more useful assistance.
Speaker 1:And we
Speaker 2:have the image here.
Speaker 1:Oh, yes. Pull up what I think it probably looks like based on this description that it's screenless, movable and designed to serve as a new kind of home computer for the AIR. That's what I'm hoping for. Sort of a function one concert level speakers that have wheels and can be wheeled around. It's movable smart speaker.
Speaker 2:It weighs it actually weighs one ton Yes.
Speaker 1:Too. Yes. Because onboard
Speaker 2:battery system Yes. They want it to be mobile. Yes. They don't want you to worry about
Speaker 1:plugging in. Exactly. Imagine just wheeling this around and just pumping out Tiesto at concert level volumes throughout your
Speaker 2:Inside any room in your
Speaker 1:home. Any room in your home. Ideally, those wheels would be motorized. It could follow you around and deafen you in any room, sort of Brian Johnson's worst nightmare. Not to call back Brian Johnson.
Speaker 1:But unlike today's smart speakers, the device will is designed to feel more
Speaker 2:yes. That is a bit. Yes. This a joke. This is a joke.
Speaker 1:But
Speaker 2:We have not been intentionally not been read in Yeah. On anything in device land because we wanna figure out what's happening
Speaker 1:Play it same game with you guys. With you guys. But if you've been using Codex and you are running Codex on or just the new ChatGPT app, which is fully Codexified, if you've been running it on your computer, it's pretty remarkable when you're on your phone and remote into your computer and you can have it go and just open your actual email. And if you're logged into a new site, it will just use your actual login to go and open the website in your Chrome browser, which is logged in, and get you whatever information you need. So having the full control.
Speaker 1:I think that people are with the Chatuchipiti app on iOS integrating to Codex or ChatGPT app on Mac, we're now crossing the chasm of the OpenClaw experience for people that weren't ready to set up the OpenClaw Yeah. Whole agentic workflows and do all of the stuff, jump through all the hoops there. These are just apps that you can install. You never really get hit with terminal window whatsoever. So like the next wave of consumers are adopting effectively these I don't even know.
Speaker 1:They're agents, but it's more like computer use plus agents plus desktop integration that makes it ultimately more usable. So unlike today's smart speakers, the device is designed to feel more lifelike according to Bloomberg, and it will include mechanical elements that move on their own along with a camera and other sensors to understand its surroundings. Powered by GPT Live, OpenAI's new real time voice mode, it should be able to hold more natural conversations and recognize when you enter a room. You'll also be able to take it around the house thanks to its rechargeable battery. Johnny Ive is helping design the product.
Speaker 1:Bloomberg says OpenAI's hardware team is developing roughly five AI devices with the speaker expected to be the first, targeting and unveiling this year ahead of a planned 2027 release. We have another example of what we think they should do in the device in the device battle. The new smart device that I want from OpenAI is, of course, the you've heard Greg Brockman say this. Taste is a new core skill. Right?
Speaker 1:Yep. So what can computers what are they uniquely bad at doing? Taste. Creating tastes for you. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Right? There's no real smell o vision yet. There's no computer device. There's no smart device that actually puts a taste in your mouth to signal what's going on with your AI agent. So I put together Melt, my pitch for the next AI device from OpenAI.
Speaker 2:A custom fit oral wearable that turns AI agent status into flavor. So you can feel a ChatGPT codex run without watching the terminal.
Speaker 1:Yes. So you don't need to look at a screen. This is perfect if you're trying to cut back in your screen time. You don't need to hear anything. You can just listen to the beautiful surroundings of wherever you are.
Speaker 1:And yet, you're still tapped in. You still know whether your build is failing or not. Because you pair it with you pair with Codex, it maps the signals and it ships by taste. So when your agent is done, a clean sour pulse tells you that it's time to review the work. If something
Speaker 2:breaks good. Like a good Yeah.
Speaker 1:Sort of like a Sour Patch Kids. Yeah. Nice. A It's little sweet, but it's sour. You know?
Speaker 1:Yeah. Lets you know, hey, it's time to go check on what's happening, review some code, make sure everything's shipping as you hope it is. If something breaks, you get a flash of heat, it gets spicy in your mouth. This pulls your attention. You gotta you gotta lock in.
Speaker 1:So you have some spicy flavor in your mouth. If your API balance hits zero, you get this bitter taste. It's not good. You gotta go refill makes
Speaker 2:the problem impossible to ignore.
Speaker 1:Yes. But if everything is green, everything is shipping appropriately, everything's good to go, you get a sweet pop in your mouth that rewards the win. And it's also a Pavlovian feedback loop because you're just on the hunt for the next burst of flavor. And it can also look like an iced out grill, which might be nice.
Speaker 2:More seriously We got a winner. We were over here at TBPN HQ. Any any idea that we have immediately gets turned into a website now. Yes. We have the laptop detailing company of San Francisco.
Speaker 1:Yes.
Speaker 2:And and this is a business that we actually think should be built. Yes. John was cleaning his laptop last week and whatever product you had ordered off of Amazon.
Speaker 1:Didn't order it. Team ordered it. It's an it's a normal like screen wipe. But I didn't realize that you're supposed to use gloves when you use these screen wipes and it gave me a chemical burn all over my hands. Don't be very careful.
Speaker 1:Like my whole
Speaker 2:Just lot of the screen on my fingers. Screen.
Speaker 1:Healing off. It's been terrible.
Speaker 2:So we think that there is a
Speaker 1:It's real
Speaker 2:business. Silly but real business opportunity to make a laptop computer, you know, like a computer detailing service, like a car detailing service Yes. For laptops. You sign up a bunch of companies, startups in San Francisco, you know, early stage companies, enterprise, etcetera. You give them a monthly plan to keep all of their employees' laptops clean and polished.
Speaker 2:And, yeah, this was this was one shot and I think it gets the job done. So no excuses. I think that for the only thing I disagree with on the site is the the pricing.
Speaker 1:The pricing? How much
Speaker 2:would you think? I think $29.99.
Speaker 1:Well, you know why this is so subsidized because the screen cleaners are looking for trade secrets and then trading off of them. But of course, if you're doing this, you need to have the the no no insider trading guarantee, which is featured here. To be extremely clear, our detailers will not photograph, memorize, transcribe, trade upon, tiff off a roommate or otherwise profit from anything visible on your screen. 100% information is not used. Right?
Speaker 2:That's Let them know. A great You gotta let them know. That's a great offer.
Speaker 1:We clean screens. We do not read them. It's almost like he doth he doth protest too much. Even if your screen contains an unreleased earnings report, even if the font is very large, even if the ticker symbol is impossible to miss, our detailers will not be trading on your inside
Speaker 2:I think I think these have to be on-site visits. Yeah. Yep.
Speaker 1:What's another big problem in the world? Big problem is that everyone knows the phrase, you can't put the toothpaste back in the tube. But what if you could? What if you could? What if toothpaste came in a luxurious jar?
Speaker 1:The company's called Paradox, toothpaste out of the tube. It's a refillable frosted glass jar that turns the most ordinary part of your morning into a ritual worth displaying. Do you think this would sell? Paradox. Yes.
Speaker 1:Most toothpaste is designed to be hidden. Paradox is designed to be seen and used with intention twice a day. Scoop one precise pearl. No crusty cap. No guesswork.
Speaker 1:No wasted squeeze. Brush your teeth. Then you What do do with
Speaker 2:spoon though? You're you just dip
Speaker 3:it back in the toothpaste. No.
Speaker 1:Luxurious toothpaste.
Speaker 2:It's over for this idea.
Speaker 1:This is a bad idea?
Speaker 2:It's funny though.
Speaker 1:It solves the problem. You can't put toothpaste back in
Speaker 2:the tube. This
Speaker 1:is Everyone's been clamoring.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Everyone's been clamoring for
Speaker 3:this.
Speaker 1:To put the toothpaste back in the tube. Now you can. Tyler made one. He has a pitch for
Speaker 2:Yeah. For Kedra.
Speaker 3:Yeah. This was another idea I had for an OpenAI device. Yeah. So basically, it's a water bottle Mhmm. With a keyboard wrapped around it.
Speaker 1:Okay.
Speaker 3:So if we can pull this up here. You can see, like, you know, a of times you're typing and then you go to grab water, you're thirsty.
Speaker 1:You wanna keep typing.
Speaker 3:Yeah. And this also is especially prescient now because of everyone's using Whisper. Right? Mhmm. You gotta talk and you can't talk while you're drinking water.
Speaker 1:Right? So why not just put a microphone on here instead of keyboard?
Speaker 3:No. No.
Speaker 1:That's the
Speaker 3:whole point. When you're in the active drinking water, you
Speaker 1:can't Oh, so you gotta switch to typing. So you have to start typing. That's right.
Speaker 2:It's almost
Speaker 3:like a a flute.
Speaker 1:Kind of Yeah. That makes a lot of sense. But I think I think
Speaker 3:this can be pretty promising.
Speaker 1:I actually think that when when you showed me this image, I think just aesthetically, it's a cool looking bottle even if the keyboard isn't functional whatsoever. I think people would just rock this type of bottle because they like the aesthetics of a keyboard. Sort of like that NVIDIA purse. You've seen the GPU purse that's it's clear plastic and then inside is a a 100 or some sort of Nvidia GPU and it just sort of shows you the circuit board and the circuit board is the art, is the design of the purse. I thought it was pretty cool.
Speaker 1:I I I would pick one of these up if you manufactured one. What do you think?
Speaker 2:Absolutely not. We have another new car alert. New car alert? This one car is called Chip. Mhmm.
Speaker 2:Chip Motors. Let's play this. Is funny. Is funny. Here we go.
Speaker 2:I wanna see their A year ago Mhmm. You could have been sitting there thinking, why has no one made a cute EV car for getting around your town or your neighborhood? Yeah. Why has no one done And now there's like seven companies. There's a bunch of companies.
Speaker 2:Apparently, lot of people had the same idea.
Speaker 1:Okay.
Speaker 2:Jamieson from the CEO of Chip Motors says the next great American car is a robot. It talks, parks itself, more customized than your coffee Mhmm. And eat chip.
Speaker 1:You can
Speaker 2:observe today.
Speaker 1:Let's play this video. I wanna see it.
Speaker 3:Yes. Saturday's here. I'm Chip, by the way. Let's get moving. Hi, Chip.
Speaker 3:Hey, Chip. Hey, my crew's here. Ready to roll.
Speaker 1:Oh, he's got crazy FOMO. That's right.
Speaker 3:Fudge him. Go get him, guys. Have fun. Love you too. And I'm talking to myself.
Speaker 3:Hi. Go park, Chip. You got it, boss.
Speaker 1:I like the LED screen on the front. I've seen demos of that in, like, Chinese cars.
Speaker 3:I forgot the snacks again. Can you run to the market? On it.
Speaker 1:Drives itself? This is bold. This is gonna take some regulatory approval.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Okay. So I love the vision. Yeah.
Speaker 2:And I think as just the base model in its current design, we'll sell units. Right? I
Speaker 1:I mean, there's like to channel Doug D'Amiro, he'd say it's no there's no way it's gonna wind up shipping at 15 k. There's gonna be a bunch of upgrades. It's gonna be difficult. Yes, like, it it at 15 k with these features, like, 100%. But Yeah.
Speaker 1:This is a demo.
Speaker 2:At at even at somewhere in the range of, you know, 20 to 30. Yep. Think these things sell because I know what these sort of, like, higher end neighborhood golf carts go for. Yep. They're already all in that range.
Speaker 2:So, I I agree. It's probably
Speaker 1:But at this point, you said like, yes, I will buy this this neighborhood golf cart to like seven different golf carts and you're like 400 k in the hole on golf carts. And you coulda just got a lucha and chop the top.
Speaker 2:Chop the top on the lucha.
Speaker 1:Gotta chop the top.
Speaker 2:It's not a bad idea. Imagine your the example I think they used was like a kid's soccer practice. Can you imagine like parking for a kid's soccer practice or soccer game and being like, yeah, robot that I just bought. Like, go park yourself. Like, that just sounds like the sketchiest situation.
Speaker 1:This customizer is so cool. You can you can get livery of like an American flag from the factory.
Speaker 2:It it's taking a different direction than Amble. Is betting that you're gonna want something that has less technology. Right?
Speaker 1:Mhmm.
Speaker 2:More more simplicity.
Speaker 1:Mhmm.
Speaker 2:They're going very tech forward. Everything from autonomous driving to, you know, screens and AI in the device. Yep. Different different bets, different customer bases, I think, that can both work. We're we're in touch now with with the Chip team, we'll we'll look to get them on on the show at some point soon.
Speaker 2:And hopefully, they can just drive this thing right right behind the horse and get on the set.
Speaker 1:I'm excited. I mean, I I do really, really hope that the time to market for startup, these weird, like, sort of niche vehicles and these new EV makers shortens because we had this moment where it was impossible to start a new car company. Then Elon built Tesla into what it is, the number one selling car in, I think, The US and in China, the Model Y. So huge success. And then there were a number of follow ons that were like Nikola and a few others that that either ended very poorly or went bankrupt or didn't really get to breakthrough.
Speaker 1:And they took, you know, years and years and years and billions of dollars in capital to ship something and they didn't weren't really able to find their footing in the in the market because at the time when, for example, like Lucid Lucid, you know, eventually launched a premium EV SUV or a premium they eventually launched an SUV, but a sedan. And by that time, like, the Taycan was out and and a few other and Mercedes had the EQS. And so there were a lot of other major brands that had been able to deliver on a similar promise on a similar timeline. Whereas Tesla's advantage was that they were able to be the first EV and they had like a monopoly on EVs for like a decade, basically. It was the only viable one.
Speaker 1:It was like that or like the Nissan LIVF. And now there's more competition, but they're but they're established. I'm interested to see, can this come to market in two year time frame or three years or something, as opposed to I would be really I'd be really disappointed. And that might be regulatory failure. That might just be the supply chain.
Speaker 1:There might be a variety of different things. But based on the speed with which we see China shipping all sorts of vehicles that crab walk and spin around and do jump and all these crazy features, I would certainly hope that startups are able to bring cars like this to the market much faster. We'll see you tomorrow.
Speaker 2:Do us a small favor and have the best Wednesday afternoon of your life.
Speaker 1:Indeed. Indeed.
Speaker 2:Just do it.
Speaker 1:Sign up for a newsletter at tbpn.com.
Speaker 2:It's the least you could do.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Please. And we'll see you tomorrow. We love you. Goodbye.