Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
The Bare Metal Cyber CISM Audio Course is your comprehensive, exam-focused audio companion for mastering the Certified Information Security Manager (CISM) certification. Designed to guide aspiring security leaders through all four domains of the CISM exam, this prepcast translates complex risk, governance, and incident response concepts into clear, structured, and easy-to-follow episodes. Whether you're transitioning from a technical role or already managing security programs, the series offers over 70 expertly crafted sessions to reinforce key principles, strengthen exam readiness, and accelerate your journey to certification. Ready to start your journey with confidence? Learn more at BareMetalCyber.com.
Welcome to The Bare Metal Cyber CISM Prepcast. This series helps you prepare for the exam with focused explanations and practical context.
An effective security strategy cannot be built in a vacuum. It must be shaped by a clear understanding of the internal and external environments in which the organization operates. This process, known as environmental awareness, is foundational to strategic security planning. The purpose of identifying internal and external influences on security strategy is to ensure that priorities remain aligned with changing business needs, evolving regulatory obligations, and the dynamic threat landscape. Environmental awareness helps leaders anticipate constraints that could limit program effectiveness, identify opportunities to enhance security posture, and allocate resources with greater confidence. When strategic planning is rooted in this awareness, the resulting decisions are more resilient, risk-informed, and forward-looking. Security leaders can no longer afford to operate reactively. They must integrate this awareness into program governance to ensure that security remains adaptive and relevant over time—not just compliant in the moment. By understanding what forces shape the security environment, organizations can create strategies that are realistic, agile, and deeply aligned with enterprise goals.
Internally, the organization itself is one of the most significant influencers of security strategy. Business objectives and operational priorities set the tone for what the security program must support. If the business is focused on rapid product development, the security strategy must accommodate development cycles without becoming an obstacle. The structure of the organization—whether centralized or distributed—affects how controls are designed and enforced. Culture also plays a role. A culture that values innovation may need different risk communications than one that is highly risk-averse. Leadership support determines whether security gets the visibility and resourcing it requires. The maturity of existing IT and security programs is another internal factor. A program that is just beginning may focus on foundational controls, while a mature program may prioritize optimization or automation. Resource availability—staffing levels, budget constraints, and toolsets—also shape what can realistically be achieved in a given timeframe. Finally, historical data such as internal audit findings, previous incidents, and organizational risk tolerance must be considered when defining strategy. Together, these internal influences form the operating framework for what the security program can and should accomplish.
The organization’s business strategy and growth trajectory directly shape the requirements placed on the security function. Expansions into new geographic markets, digital service offerings, or industry verticals often bring new threats, compliance obligations, and operational complexities. Mergers, acquisitions, and organizational restructuring frequently introduce new systems, processes, and cultures that require integration and harmonization of security approaches. Digital transformation initiatives, including cloud adoption, automation, and data analytics, expand the attack surface and demand different types of controls than traditional environments. As customer expectations shift—especially around privacy, availability, and transparency—the security program must evolve to meet those demands. Business models themselves may change, such as transitioning from one-time product sales to subscription-based services or platform ecosystems. The security strategy must be structured to enable—not obstruct—these changes. It must be flexible enough to scale, adapt, and support innovation while continuing to reduce risk and safeguard assets.
The external threat landscape is one of the most dynamic and unpredictable influences on security strategy. Threats evolve constantly, with new malware variants, advanced persistent threat actors, and attack vectors emerging regularly. Organizations must stay informed about threat intelligence from both public and private sources. This includes reports from industry consortiums, government agencies, and commercial threat intelligence providers. Certain sectors or regions may face targeted threats—such as financial institutions experiencing credential stuffing, or healthcare organizations targeted by ransomware actors. Geopolitical instability can shape attacker motivations and shift the risk profile for multinational organizations. Emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, the Internet of Things, and blockchain are not only innovation drivers—they are also creating new vulnerabilities and expanding the threat surface. Threat actors now exploit supply chains, cloud misconfigurations, and social engineering techniques with increasing frequency. Security leaders must monitor these trends continuously, assess their relevance to the organization, and adjust strategy accordingly.
Legal, regulatory, and compliance drivers exert another significant influence on the design and implementation of security strategy. Data protection regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or the California Consumer Privacy Act impose requirements around data handling, breach notification, and privacy rights. Industry-specific frameworks—such as the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard for financial transactions, the North American Electric Reliability Corporation’s Critical Infrastructure Protection standards for energy providers, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for publicly traded companies—may dictate control structures,