Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
I analyzed 590 Casey Neistat uploads and found five YouTube rules my own channel was following that Casey's data quietly destroyed.
$32,700 in savings. 10 months of runway. non-technical founder building a real SaaS to $10K/month using only AI tools - or going broke trying.
this playlist is my full journey from $1,940 MRR to $10K MRR, filmed in real time with real numbers. the wins. the fuck-ups and the dollars. no code experience. no safety net. just AI tools and a deadline.
new videos every week. subscribe to see how it ends.
# Final transcript
my best video has 28 views per day. Casey Neistat's worst video
has 455. And after analyzing every video he's made for the
last 10 years, I finally know why. Five rules I was following
Casey breaks all of them. And his flaw is 16 times my ceiling.
I'm Lennyc Saint, creator, builder, not some AI guru. I've
got 10 AI agents across three different machines. So none of
this is theory. My mom, she believed in quality education and
aims, which is AI made simple, means quality AI education for
everyone. So if you are here to use AI for real work, you're in
the right place. So Casey Neistat has done 1.93 billion views on
YouTube. That is 590 videos over 10 years, one creator, zero
side channels in this analysis. My channel is stuck at 1,530
subscribers. It's been flat for the last 48 hours. And that is
the reason I did this analysis. And it turned up five different
packaging rules. Each one I was actually following and each one
the data killed rule four is the one that broke me rule five is
the one I'm keeping and you'll see why in a second rule one,
always add chapters to your description. Every issue tutorial
says this, I followed it 57% of my videos have chapters. But
Casey Neistat zero out of 590 across 10 years, not one single
chapter. If we take a look at Casey's descriptions, it is just
a paragraph and a link. And that's it. This is the most
recent one from three days ago, he shouts out the musicians
behind the video and the portrait photographer that he met.
And other than that, there's nothing personally, I've been
breaking my videos into step one, step two, step three, because
Guru's told me to but Casey treats every upload as one
continuous thing. It's not a study guide. It is one moment.
I'm going to try something new for the next few videos. I'm
going to kill my chapters. Yes, including the chapters in this
video description. So rule one is dead, we've got four more to
go. And rule four is the one that broke me. Rule two, always
put a number in your title. 85% of my titles have a number. How
many does Casey use 16.1%. Personally, I was stuffing five
tips and three ways and 10 lessons into every title
because SEO gurus said numbers get clicks. Casey, on the other
hand, just writes the thing did not expect this in first
class. New York City scum snowboarding with the NYPD. Do
what you can't. Why would anyone live in NYC 84,000 views per
day on this last one? No number. So numbers in every title that
rule is killed. Casey Neistat's recent YouTube videos are up
between four to six words. None of them have numbers. The best
one averages 84,000 views per day. I was wrong. Two down. Rule
four is the one that took me out. But first, rule three, long
titles get more keywords. More keywords means more clicks.
However, Casey's median title is 27 characters, five words, mine
closer to 65. Casey's top videos are only five characters
longer than his bottom videos. So the point here is that length
isn't the lever specificity is put differently. I was writing
titles like I was trying to win a scrabble game, but Casey writes
them like he's texting a friend. Here's what a rewrite of one of
my titles could look like and what one of your titles could
look like when we apply this change before how I built 14 AI
employees across three machines after do it anyway. So rule
three is dead. Now the one that broke me rule for rule for open
your video with a number never a question. That's what every
YouTube retention guru taught me. And I did exactly that. But then
I looked at Casey Neistat's data. Casey Neistat's top videos
open with a question 22% of the time. His bottom videos on the
other hand opened with a question 1.7% of the time.
That's a 13 times gap on one binary choice to have a question or
to not have a question. And it is a single biggest signal in 590
videos. And I was doing the opposite. So this is directional
in his data not causal. You can't copy Casey Neistat's
question hooks and pull 84,000 views per day. But the gap is
real. The gap is 13 times. And from now on, it's changing how I'm
going to open every YouTube script with one sharp question and
the body will answer it. So send this video to your creator
friend who still leads every video with a number that hook is
bleeding viewers and they don't know it rule for dead. We've got
one more. But I did say that the fifth one is the one I'm
keeping. Here's why rule five pack your script with information
more words per minute means more value. Casey's median
transcript is 1031 words mine 5141 five times more. I thought I
was being generous whereas I was actually being exhausting. For
example, a subscriber told me last month quote brother I
listened to it 10 times and my mind is fried. That was on me. So
this rule I'm not killing I'm just going to tweak it cut it in
half from 5000 words and I'm going to try doing 2500 instead
starting today. Okay, so four rules dead one cut in half. Now
what do you actually do with all of this? There are three layers
and your job is to pick which one fits where you are. Layer one
is copy paste just kill chapters one click test for four weeks
compare your attention. Layer two aim at this is where you want
to make every title 35 characters or less one specific
noun. No colons no fake question marks. Keep it simple like
Casey aim at 35 characters. Layer three is build the system pull
your last 30 videos compute your own feature prevalence. What
does that mean? Well, what is your unique style in your
YouTube videos across your thumbnails, titles, hooks,
transcripts, descriptions, etc. Then find your top 10% of
features and your bottom 10% of features. The gap between them
is the lever that is your system. Which of these five rules
will you kill first rule one always add chapters rule two
numbers in every title rule three long titles win rule four
open with a number rule five pack the script comment below and
let me know which YouTube career that you want me to do AI
content forensics on next. I'm thinking Tim Ferriss or MKBHD if
you know either of those two people and you have a preference
let me know below three videos a week and I'm going to keep
dissecting creators until your channel breaks past whatever
wall mine just broke. I'm also building a tool that does the
threads version of this whole thing. It's called Threadify link
will be in the pinned comment. You can start for a free no
card required. Don't be a dropkick. Subscribe and I'll see
you in the next one. Peace