Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Technology's daily show (formerly the Technology Brothers Podcast). Streaming live on X and YouTube from 11 - 2 PM PST Monday - Friday. Available on X, Apple, Spotify, and YouTube.
Welcome to Technology Brothers, the number one live show in tech. We are live from the temple of technology in beautiful downtown Los Angeles. It's Friday, 02/07/2025. This show starts now. Jordy?
Speaker 2:What do you got for me, John? The question is We
Speaker 1:got some amazing breaking news. We got, first up, massive news out of y Combinator. We gotta ring the size gong for a bunch of developers, bunch of founders from Overlap. They are part of YC summer twenty twenty four. They build multimodal AI agents that can understand search and edit videos, and they raised a $1,900,000 seeds seed round.
Speaker 1:Let's ring the size gong for them. Congratulations to everyone over at overlap. We wanna highlight this because this honestly seems like something we need.
Speaker 2:We use.
Speaker 1:We yeah. I would 100% demo this. We'd probably be power users. We are creating more content intact than anyone has ever even tried to do before.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Our goal for people that don't know, we're trying to get up to doing a hundred and twenty hours a week live streaming. We're we're at we're at about fifteen hours a week right now, so we got a ways to go. But, overlap seems like a tool that would help us, you know, better utilize all the content that we're creating and make it you know, right now, we have a team of, you know, we have Ben, our producer, then we have a team of editors that help us take the content that we create and repurpose it for other platforms. So, this looks like exactly like something that we would use.
Speaker 2:And, I'm sure their their sort of long term strategy is to to, you know, completely displace all, podcasters.
Speaker 1:And so
Speaker 2:it might be one of those things where we're kind of, like, funding our own demise. But
Speaker 1:Impossible. Impossible. We are built different. I will fight the AI apocalypse personally, and I will go toe to toe with any ASI AGI system. You can't create these takes in silicon.
Speaker 1:It's impossible.
Speaker 2:It's impossible.
Speaker 1:It's impossible.
Speaker 2:We're going on record.
Speaker 1:We're going on record.
Speaker 2:To see I'd like to see, Dom, AI drink Dom Perignon, to celebrate growth milestones. I just don't think it's gonna happen. But, these guys deserve a a little sip of, champagne for this moment. It's obviously day one for them still, but I'm excited to try out the product and congrats on a nice, nice little round.
Speaker 1:Nice little round coming out of demo day. Let's, let's break down their announcement. Their seed round came from a bunch of different investors. They got Y Combinator, Collab Fund, Transpose, Orange Collective, Pioneer Fund, and the twenty three punt fund. We're proud to welcome angels and operators from Amazon, Figma, Anthropic, Loom, Netflix, Meta, and OpenAI.
Speaker 1:What they do, they this is how they describe it. Open overlap builds multimodal AI agents for media companies and video creators. That's us, baby. Our first AI agent, a video marketing agent can autonomously understand search, and edit videos. This agent now helps dozens of companies and creators by instantly transforming their long videos into clips for social media.
Speaker 1:This is what we're trying to do. We're trying to be everywhere. We gotta get on LinkedIn. We gotta get on Instagram. This takes a lot of work.
Speaker 2:Not LinkedIn is not ready.
Speaker 1:LinkedIn is not ready for us. We are going to flood LinkedIn. And I I really do think that we can bring some great content there, have a lot of fun, and ultimately get a lot of views and and and, have a big impact, which I'm excited about. And they said over the last few months, our customers have seen a 10 x increase in engagement while saving over twenty hours per week. I love that.
Speaker 1:We are working a hundred and twenty hours a week. If we could make it a hundred and forty with the help of AI, I would do that immediately. Immediately. And so what's next? Their seed round accelerates their mission to define the role AI will play in video workflows.
Speaker 1:With this capital, they're gearing up to accelerate product development, expand the team, and scale their impact. Stay tuned for more updates as they push boundaries of what's possible at the intersection of video and AI. So congrats to the overlap team. We love to
Speaker 2:see dogs.
Speaker 1:Some big funding rounds happen out of YC demo day. Well, let's move on to our next story. We have some breaking news out of Figma. They announced a new product, improvement. Aspect ratios can now be locked in Figma.
Speaker 1:People have been asking
Speaker 2:for this. Go.
Speaker 1:Let's go. And it sounds like a minor thing, but look at the response. This is the the they're they're promoting what you know, a a a slight product revision. The designers went crazy. This was not only not only did this post get four k, likes, but it was also a trending topic on x.
Speaker 1:Like, I went into the x, like, search feed, and it was the it was one of the top topics.
Speaker 2:The streets of Brooklyn have been absolutely begging for this, John. I mean, they've been they've been campaigning, protesting, hitting the streets
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:You know, cold calling, trying to get Dylan to make this happen. They rolled it out. And it's just cool. You know, as as big of a company as Figma is, as many people that use it, there's still things that they can do to meaningfully improve the product. And to be honest, I'm very excited about this.
Speaker 2:Like, I had kind of a workaround to to do this, like, ax aspect ratio lock, but it wasn't something that you could do in the canvas. So very excited about this. And I think they probably if they were public right now, that that you can imagine the stock would have jumped easily $5.06 percent off the news. This is absolutely massive for the design community and, you know, startups everywhere. So congratulations to Dylan and the team.
Speaker 1:Yeah. We are we are huge fans of Figma here. We used it to design our the pitch deck for our, for TB, that we send to everyone that we partner with. We're using it to design the show overlays that you'll see, coming soon to the live stream. And so it's an incredibly versatile tool.
Speaker 1:We're using it to design our new website. And, and and and and fun fact, when Jordy makes a meme, he actually makes it in Figma.
Speaker 2:I do. I do.
Speaker 1:These are I'm not using any of those advanced meme makers.
Speaker 2:I'm not using any of those slop meme generator apps on the phone. If if you wanna do numbers, you gotta be you gotta be in Figma grinding. You gotta have your whole workspace. You gotta have good, you know, images to pull from. You gotta have good fonts ready.
Speaker 2:So, it's a craft. You gotta respect it. It's almost a full time job for me. If I'm not streaming, I'm memeing. And, thank you to Figma for, making that possible.
Speaker 1:I love it. And let's stay with Figma and talk about, the CEO, Dylan. He's an absolute dog. We talked about it before on the show. He's a beast.
Speaker 1:He is breaking down the impact of Figma, responding to Sahil, from Gumroad. Sahil says, many have confused design with knowing Figma. And this is again, Figma is just a tool. You gotta be a crack designer. You gotta know the tool, but you gotta know how to use it.
Speaker 1:And so Dylan says, always liked, RSMS's framing. Figma is like a staircase. The first step should be easy to take, and further steps should lead you to build mastery over time. We're on a mission to make Figma more accessible than ever. The craft of design still takes decades to perfect.
Speaker 1:Couldn't agree with that.
Speaker 2:So I would I would I would, you know, use my own personal experience with Figma. I started using Figma without, any real design, you know, education. Right? Totally self trained.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:I think I had good taste, but I didn't actually know how to use the tool at all, and I wouldn't have considered myself designer at all. I still don't really consider myself a designer, but I am so confident with Figma that I can create pretty good looking designs, at least, like, MVPs for ideas that I have. And that's, like, really accelerated my, sort of design timelines and really helped me work with designers. And so, yeah, I think it's amazing that Figma is not Figma is easy to use. It's not incredibly easy to use, but if you just start using it, you'll figure it out quickly.
Speaker 2:And it's, you know, it's fairly intuitive. So just because you're not a designer, yet doesn't mean you shouldn't be in Figma using it. It's a super powerful tool, and I think that framing is great because, yeah, it is a staircase. I figured out how to drop a picture in and add text over it. And then suddenly I was, you know, making websites or product screens or things like that.
Speaker 2:So very powerful and, it doesn't take much to get started. Speaker three (1h twenty three ms 1s):
Speaker 1:Figma is a staircase, and let me tell you, Jordy's calves are absolutely jacked. They're they're bulging out from all those stair
Speaker 2:climbs he's been doing.
Speaker 1:But seriously, Figma is an incredible company. They went through this, I mean, really long grind. It took him three years to launch the product. Dylan started building the company in 2012. They didn't go, they didn't actually launch the product until 2015.
Speaker 1:They've raised a bunch of money. Then that crazy Adobe deal happens, gets broken up in antitrust. Now founder led company, super well capitalized, absolutely on a mission.
Speaker 2:And think about the timing with all these new generative AI, you know, products exploding. They have the distribution. They have the users. There's so many of these features that they can add. Yep.
Speaker 2:I, there was a company called, well, I'm blanking on the name. Diagram Diagram by Jordan Singer. Sarah, my wife invested in the company, and, they actually were acquired by Figma they were doing a bunch of stuff around generative AI. So Figma is extremely well positioned to, roll out a lot of these tools and, just embed them in the existing software. So it's Yep.
Speaker 2:Yep.
Speaker 1:They're 100% going after the developer community now. And this in Figma pretty soon is gonna be a tool that is integrated directly into just a full stack developer's toolkit. And it's gonna be something that that even if they aren't a master of the previous iteration of Figma, it's gonna be so much more accessible because of LLMs and just being able to orchestrate things like you would cursor in the in the IDE, like you would Devin in a Slack channel working on, GitHub pull requests. It's all gonna be the same flow, and so that's gonna create way more versatility for, a a CEO who codes and, does design. It's gonna be all over the place.
Speaker 1:It's gonna be amazing. Really excited for them. So stay tuned for more updates. We'll have to have Dylan on the show soon. Let's go to another breaking news story, massive product update from Palantir.
Speaker 1:They have partnered with XAI, and they've integrated Grok into the enterprise. It's now officially available in AIP, the the artificial intelligence program, spearheaded by Shyam Sankar over at Palantir. We're huge fans of Palantir, and it's great to see that there's even more options for what foundation model you wanna use when you're building these data driven workflows for the for the government.
Speaker 2:I love how they just threw this graphic out. It's very unclear what's happening, but it looks awesome.
Speaker 1:This is a video. We're working on showing videos. We haven't figured it out yet, but the video I think this is a before slide.
Speaker 2:Video the video guys don't know how to put video on a screen. This is, we got a little bit
Speaker 1:of the plane as we fly it here at T B P N. Stick with us. We will quote tweet this post. You can go and watch the full video. I'm sure it's fantastic.
Speaker 1:Let's move on to, Eliano who is describing exactly what's going on there. There is an ontology of data that Palantir has created, these hierarchical workflows, organizing all this data, dropping AI on top of it, and nothing feels better than dropping a big word like ontology on someone. You feel like a boss. Put in your vernacular. Put in your toolkit.
Speaker 1:Highly recommend using it.
Speaker 2:Fantastic. Yeah. And Eliana's emerging as one of this year's hottest posters. He's been absolutely on a tear. He's got the Palantirians behind him.
Speaker 2:He's rallying them. The stock's rallying. It's just up only for, the team over at Palantir. So Yeah. Love to see it.
Speaker 1:Fantastic team and great to see them partnering with Elon. I think just on yesterday's show, you said that, you could imagine a world where Elon was a cofounder of Palantir. It feels like that it feels like an Elon driven company. Karp obviously has so much of the same founder driven energy. It's just a fantastic company, and we're excited to see them, release huge products and integrate with, with more LLMs and really, hopefully, make the government more efficient, which is what we're all excited about
Speaker 2:this week. Give them some, even the government should be able to make memes internally so they can use Grok's image generation product as well. Just, you know, flip some stuff around Microsoft Teams. That'd be awesome as well.
Speaker 1:Dude, I mean, Grox image generation is remarkably good. I I had it generate an image of Saquon Barkley, who's the, who's the next top story that we're going to go gonna go to. Saquon Barkley and Jeb Bush are both investors in ramp, and I needed an image of both of them at a business meeting at a share ramp shareholders meeting smiling, and it nailed it. It was an uncannily good. It was been fantastic.
Speaker 1:The jersey was on point. All the details are right. The number of fingers was correct, and it looked exactly like them. I was very satisfied. I got my money Finger test.
Speaker 2:The finger test.
Speaker 1:The finger test was passed. And and all the other all the other, image generation systems, denied it. They were like, no. I won't I won't create an image of Jeb Bush, which, like, I I think it's fair use. Like, you know, this is something I could have done in Photoshop, just just copy and pasting.
Speaker 1:So I don't know. But, you the the breaking news from yesterday. I don't know if you saw this, Jordy, but, obviously, ramp is running a Super Bowl ad. Or as we think about it, you know, there will be a showing of the ramp ad on on Sunday, and
Speaker 2:there will
Speaker 1:be some football to help promote that ad.
Speaker 2:Yeah. I think actually so so Kendrick Lamar, actually agreed to do the halftime show once he knew that ramp was running an ad.
Speaker 1:That makes sense.
Speaker 2:Because he wasn't sure that football would be enough of a draw to really get people, you know, there back packing out the stadium. But once he heard about the ramp ad, easy yes from him. Yeah. I'll be there. I'll help create the right environment for people to be, you know, experiencing the ad.
Speaker 2:So, very, very excited that Kendrick Kendrick Lamar decided to step up and, help promote ramp on Sunday.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. It's fantastic. Well, Saquon Barkley is starring in that ramp ad. You'll be able to see it, live on Sunday.
Speaker 1:And, Eric Gleiman, you know, we we were joking. We didn't really know who Saquon Barkley was, when they told us. But now we're super fans, you know, massive supporters mostly of his, investment portfolio, but he's also, I guess, pretty good on the field too. Yeah. But, an absolute, goated investor, future hall of famer in the business hall of fame for
Speaker 2:sure. Yeah. In the TV in the TV, probably be has a bright future posting too. Yep. He's got he's clearly got, you know, good taste and and good ideas, and and that's usually what it takes to, you know, dominate the timeline.
Speaker 2:So after he's done dominating the field on Sunday, I'd like to see a 20 part thread breaking down. Here's how the game went. Here's what we could've done better. Here's what we're gonna be taking into the off season and, you know, maybe, you know, a little bit of a celebration as well. And, you know, looking at this picture, I could see you with an ear you know, a similar earring, but maybe, like, a podcast microphone just kinda dangling there.
Speaker 2:So even when you're off the air, when you're walking around the street, people know, hey. This guy's a podcaster. He's wearing a suit. I'm gonna treat him with a level of, you know, respect that, that a hardworking podcaster deserves.
Speaker 1:Yeah. For sure. And I like the eye black. You know, that's to to keep the sun out of your eyes, stop the reflections. There's a lot of light on the set.
Speaker 1:We might need to do wear some eye black occasionally just to make sure everything's dialed in and we're really focused in when we're podcasting. But let's go through this. So, so Eric sent me some backstory on, on Saquon Barkley. There's a there's a great profile on him. Saquon Barkley is a superhero for the Eagles.
Speaker 1:His origin story is straight out of a comic book too. The man who has led the Philadelphia Eagles Super Bowl run, the man who has been the most exciting player in football almost quit the sport just before his career was about to take off. That was fourteen years ago in Eastern Pennsylvania before Saquon Barkley became Saquon, a hulking, hurdling blur with superhero like muscles. I love it. That's it.
Speaker 1:I watched a highlight reel of him. I mean, I'm I'm a super fan now. It it it is incredible. He he has some
Speaker 2:I I I looked up some pictures of of some, plays yesterday because I wanted a shot of him running with the ramp card into the end zone. You know?
Speaker 1:There you go. Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2:And, anyways, an absolute dog.
Speaker 1:And so, they have a bunch of quotes here to help tell the story of Saquon. I thought it'd be fun to go through this just because, you know, even though, yeah, he's he's dipping his toe in the business world for the first time, he's clearly an incredibly inspirational figure and has done something remarkable. And studying greatness on in the business world and beyond is Yeah. Is something so valuable. There's a reason why David Senra has covered Kobe Bryant, Michael Jordan on the founder's podcast.
Speaker 1:Sure.
Speaker 2:There are even, Keith one of Keith Rabois' favorite books is The Score Takes Care of Itself.
Speaker 1:Have you
Speaker 2:ever read that? Fantastic book.
Speaker 1:Fantastic book. Yep. And so, Brian Gilbert, the former head coach at Whitehall, his high school. I don't wanna exaggerate, but the varsity coaching staff and I literally brought him in because we'd heard after his freshman year of high school, he was gonna quit football. Barkley was frustrated, struggling with his self confidence.
Speaker 1:Some kids had matured faster than him. Sophomore year didn't he didn't play varsity because his best friend was ahead of him. Saquon had to work. That's how he's wired, and that's why he's so great. I said, listen.
Speaker 1:You may not be the best one right now, but we see potential in you. We see how fast you are. You've gotta give it more time. He said, coach, I'm so skinny. If I come up and play varsity football, I'm gonna get broken in half.
Speaker 1:We said, just get in the weight room and get stronger. Thank god he listened. And this guy and this guy squats, like, almost a thousand pounds now. Just absolute dog. Absolute dog.
Speaker 1:Dog. Love it. And so, the former varsity Whitehall quarterback who he played with, Nick Shevinsky, or Shevnisky, says he was always the freakiest athlete and the nicest human, but it seemed like there was always someone a year or two older who's a little bit better. He was never the guy, as crazy as that sounds, because now he's the epitome of the guy. I love it.
Speaker 2:That's good.
Speaker 1:Going back to Gilbert, he says, he played a little varsity as as a sophomore in 2012. At the end of that season, that summer, we went to Rutgers as a team camp. His improvements that he made that off season are different from any other athlete I've seen. He had a tremendous camp. Then Rutgers head coach Kyle Flood brings him in, him him and me into his office and offers him.
Speaker 1:He says it was based on what he saw that day in the film they'd watched, which was JV film because that's all we had. So sick. This guy just goes on a tear.
Speaker 2:One one one thing that immediately comes to mind. So, Saquon, freakiest athlete, nicest guy. Right? That's that's that's his reputation. It makes sense that he would partner with with ramp and specifically Eric Wyman because when you meet when you meet Eric or or Kareem or or or or the or the ramp exec team, they're all genuinely the kindest people that and it it almost is this weird dichotomy because they're absolute savages in business and that yet Eric is just, like, the nicest, like, sweetest human.
Speaker 2:Right? Yeah. And so it's it feels like a really perfect partnership.
Speaker 1:So, he wasn't even the number one running back in the state of Pennsylvania. No one on the staff looked at this high school film and thought this was gonna be a generational talent. This guy it it would they thought, this guy's pretty good. Let's take him, but we gotta have Andre Robinson, the the the actual number one running back in the state of Pennsylvania. As far as why he flipped so fast, he went up to a whiteout game in 2013, and I think he was like, oh my god.
Speaker 1:This is night and day from Rutgers to Penn State. One million percent. The white out game changed his life. Gilbert says, Saquon is such a pleaser, and I don't wanna disappoint anyone and doesn't wanna disappoint anyone. He asked me to how to tell Rutgers.
Speaker 1:I said, we're gonna call coach Wilson and tell him. He said, can you tell him? I said, no. You're gonna tell him. You're gonna feel better, like you've achieved something by doing this.
Speaker 1:It's gonna be hard, but you can do it. He was so nervous, but I think that little step towards knowing that he hates disappointing people, but sometimes having to do what's best for your own good helped. It made him grow a little bit. A while later, he called me. He said, I just got a call from Ohio State.
Speaker 1:Same with nor Notre Dame. Urban Meyer called him. Brian Kelly called him. Saquon didn't waver. He never went on another official visit.
Speaker 1:Never went on another unofficial visit. He asked me if he could go on five official visits to Penn State because he didn't wanna go to any other school. So he goes to Penn State. I would have loved to have coached him, but even now when I watch him, I root for him because he's a he's a great kid. And so the Penn State head coach says, to be honest with you, even up until his senior year, he wasn't thought that highly of.
Speaker 1:He was a good player, but nothing crazy. Then he had a dominant senior year. Then he played in some east west all star game, and they didn't even start him at tailback. He played fullback in the game. James and I went out to see him play early in his senior year.
Speaker 1:He had, like, 200 yards of offense, and four touchdowns in the first half, and I was like, I think we can leave now. I was texting the pilot. Our job was done. He says, we're leaving. What do you mean we're leaving?
Speaker 1:The game started at seven, and it's only 07:38. I have a cool picture from me and Spence standing on the sideline. Our local photographer shot a picture of us from over our shoulders with him in the background. I have it hanging in my basement. So sick.
Speaker 2:Cool, cool little connection. So he was at Penn State, at the same time as Bo Nickel technology brother, and, future, UFC middleweight world champion. So, anyways, bunch of also nicest, most, you know, humble guy. Fantastic. Penn State's doing something right.
Speaker 1:So they say, have you heard the story about the track deal when he was in high school? Gilbert says, this story is legendary, Franklin. He wouldn't miss opportunities to do something special. I was at the district track meet when that Whitehall hosts every year at the hundred meter dash. This girl ran and finished first, but there was a mistake with the clock, so they had to redo it.
Speaker 1:And when they redid it, she came in second. Saquon witnessed all this, so he went over and gave her his gold medal. So amazing. He said, you deserve this. People at local pubs and restaurants will ask if it's really true.
Speaker 1:Yep. It is. What a good guy. That's amazing. For me realizing he was special, it was probably the first day we were in full pads at summer camp.
Speaker 1:He read he ran a basic inside zone play. He hit the a gap and then made a jump cut all the way back to the edge and went, like, 70 yards. Everyone's going crazy. He comes right back to me and says, should I have pressed it a little more? That's where the legend of Saquon started.
Speaker 1:I remember the run from the Oklahoma drill when the three o linemen basically blocked nobody, and the three d linemen came through, and he shook them all. That was welcome to Saquon Barkley moment. Have you seen that? It's so good. In the first year, we kept trying to protect him.
Speaker 1:He had unbelievable physical tools, but we were conscious of throwing him to the wolves too soon because we didn't wanna scar him. After that Buffalo game, we were like, okay. We gotta play this guy. Then it was, how do we get him ready to play the in the big 10 without throwing too much at him? I went to our position room and went up on the board.
Speaker 1:I wrote up the number 26 and circled it. My d lineman asked what it was. I said, this is called the theory of 26. It means if any of you m MFs hit this dude in practice and hurt him, you're gonna have hell to pay. Don't touch him.
Speaker 1:He's like the quarterback. Leave him alone. I don't want one of them big dudes falling on him. After his freshman year, he said he wanted to get he wanted to get he wanted to be the best running back ever. What do I need to do to get better?
Speaker 1:He went back and looked at some of the long runs where he got run down. It happens against Rutgers, against Michigan. We went back and did a series of looking at winning in open space, breaking tackles, and making guys miss. Saquon Barkley says, you try to improve in every aspect of the game. I watched film on myself.
Speaker 1:I did self evaluation. I wanted to get better at finishing the run, break loose, and make another guy miss and get into the end zone. Eliminate the next play because anytime you have to line up again, you give the defense another opportunity. You can have a muffled snap, anything. My freshman year, I was explosive, but I didn't have true speed.
Speaker 1:My twenty and thirty yard burst was really good, but when I got to go 60 or a hundred, I didn't really have another gear. I really wanted to increase my 40 time. So sick. I love it.
Speaker 2:Crazy.
Speaker 1:And so, yeah, the it it this story kinda ends with, Huff. Going into next year, I told him you gotta be prepared to have the biggest letdown season of your life. I said, now teams are not gonna let you beat them. You have to be able to find success in the little things. Maybe you don't rush for 200 yards and three touchdowns, but you can eliminate a few negative plays, improve your pass blocking, get better at catching the ball, coming out of the backfield, develop other parts of your game.
Speaker 1:And he was like, okay. I'm good with that. I love it. Gotcha. Yeah.
Speaker 1:What a beast. So What a beast. Fans now.
Speaker 2:And he, it was just awesome to see Jeb and Saquon on the timeline yesterday just dominating. Even Jeb Jeb, Jeb baited everybody a little engagement bait. He included, you know, what looked like a bullet point at the start of the start of his post. A lot of people said, hey. Somebody sent him this post.
Speaker 2:He chose from the bullet points, and, he was just copying pasting it in. But, you know, what you know, people quickly pointed out. They said, hey. Jeb is a master of the timeline. He included that to drive engagement so his post would go more viral.
Speaker 2:So I
Speaker 1:think so.
Speaker 2:You don't get to be someone like Jeb Bush without being an absolute dog and taking every little extra step to get that extra reach, to get that extra impression. Yeah. And, I love to see him, you know, performing on the timeline.
Speaker 1:Yeah. So lesson for founders, if you're if you have somebody on your on your board or your cap table who's an interesting poster, who you wanna feed a tweet to, let them include a bullet point. Maybe even include a little spelling mistake in there so people are like, oh, like, this is this is artisanal.
Speaker 2:Quotes are good too if you include, like, one or, you know, quote at the start or the end. People are gonna say, hey. Somebody sent you that to copy and paste in.
Speaker 1:But that's viral fuel.
Speaker 2:Yeah. That's viral fuel. I I so that's so funny. So, I I don't think we talked about this post on the show, but I posted, Karl Marx failed to consider that making money with your boys is the most fun activity on Earth. Yeah.
Speaker 2:And I, I posted I, like, reviewed it, like, a few times. Yeah. I posted it. I had a typo in the fourth word. Karl Marx fail or fifth word, Karl Marx failed to consider.
Speaker 2:And I said considered. Yeah. And it still got 14,000 likes.
Speaker 1:Oh my god.
Speaker 2:That's like, how does that even work?
Speaker 1:This is more organic. It knows it's not slop. An LLM would never make that type of mistake.
Speaker 2:And I said I said, you gotta put a typo in every post to prove that you're human. And I I would never have the creativity to to think, you know, oh, I'm gonna try to trick people into, you know, thinking I'm human by put by making a mistake. Right? So, anyways, we got some,
Speaker 1:Fantastic with Saquon Barkley. Tons of great lessons for business there. I mean, the guy, total come from behind story, just absolute grinder, works on all aspects of the game, clearly reviews every piece of footage, really understands how to improve, and spends a lot of time in the gym, working on the fundamentals. And, that can be true in business. So lots to learn from say, Conan, on and off the field.
Speaker 2:I I'm generally against wearing, you know, jerseys with, another dude's name on the back. We're getting some TV jerseys made that'll be, you know, just Coogan and Hayes. But, I'm almost inclined to, you know, try to get a Saquon jersey by Sunday and just be, you know, just be cheering. You know? Not for the game, but for the ad.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. Wait waiting for that fifteen seconds to just, you know, just
Speaker 1:Blow me away.
Speaker 2:Blow it.
Speaker 1:Can't wait. Alright. We got we
Speaker 2:got some earnings presented by public.com. I'll have public up, and and you can run through this, and, I'll source any data we need to kind of support.
Speaker 1:Yeah. If you could look up what Amazon's done over the last five days, twenty four hours, I wanna know. I want the update from you from public.com. But it's earning season, boys. We covered Google.
Speaker 1:We covered Apple. We covered Facebook and Meta, and now we're on to Amazon. And I don't think we have spell. What I
Speaker 2:don't think we have this slated, but I mentioned this to you yesterday. Roblox, which which, that that, what's that research, Hindenburg Research had done a takedown on. Yeah. They reported a drop in in sort of usage. Mhmm.
Speaker 2:And, like, 30% of the stock got wiped out. So if Hindenburg was still in, in Roblox, they would have done, you know, pretty well off of that. But let's get into Amazon, a stable, humble giant. Although they are down 3%
Speaker 1:Okay.
Speaker 2:In the past week. So I
Speaker 1:mean, that's a big move for a big company like that. So they just had their earnings. Their shares fell after sales outlook is weaker than expected. The company to is is expecting to allocate a record amount of capital expenditures to AI. This has been an ongoing trend.
Speaker 1:Analysts are worried about overspending in the data center world. Some of those investments can be very good, but there is risk because cash is coming out of the balance sheet. And so let's go to the Wall Street Journal. They say, Amazon share slipped Thursday after the company projected lower than expected sales and operating income and said it plans to allocate a record amount of capital expenditure this year to build artificial intelligence infrastructure. Amazon is the latest large tech company to unveil big spending plans for AI even as some investors are starting to question whether the spending spree is prudent.
Speaker 1:Virtually every application that we know of today is going to be reinvented with AI inside of it. Amazon chief executive Andy Jassy said on a call with analysts. Amazon projected net sales for the first quarter of between a hundred and 51,000,000,000 and a hundred and 55,000,000,000 as well as operating income between 14,000,000,000 and 18,000,000,000. The high end of each outlook came in below Wall Street's expectations. And so, the company's net sales last quarter rose 10% from a year earlier to a hundred and 87,000,000,000 in line with analysts' expectations.
Speaker 1:Net income rose 88% to 20,000,000,000 higher than predicted. So very good year last year. Little bit rougher going forward. Revenue from Amazon's cloud computing unit, AWS, increased 19% to 28,790,000,000.00, slightly lower than expected. Analysts said they were closely monitoring this number after disappointing cloud computing results from Alphabet and Microsoft.
Speaker 1:What you thinking, Jordy?
Speaker 2:I'm thinking that Amazon has been weirdly out of the headlines on all things AI CapEx. It's just not something that you're thinking about and not really hearing about much. I mean, obviously, people like Dylan Patel are spending a lot of time writing about it, but it hasn't been top of mind for a lot of people. But given how how much of their business is in cloud, you would think that they would be using that to drive the narrative and trying to build momentum around, you know, the narrative the Amazon narrative around AI, and it just doesn't feel like it doesn't feel like that you know, they obviously have, like, the actual, like, core data center infrastructure and cloud leadership, but it doesn't feel like there's no, they don't they don't have their, like, sats yet. Right?
Speaker 2:Like, somebody who's coming out and, you know, going on c CNBC, trying to get on technology brothers likely, you know, things things like that. So they just don't feel like they're, while they are, like, critical and they're running a lot of this, you know, work, they don't feel like they're a big part of the conversation right now.
Speaker 1:Well, I I I think that's a great take, and I think there's mainly two reasons why we're not hearing that, even though AWS is the oldest cloud computing provider and I think by far the largest. But I think there's two things that are going on. One is that they don't have a, like, a direct consumer narrative around AI in the same way. So Google, everyone's saying, oh, how is AI gonna affect Google search? You gotta tell me about Gemini.
Speaker 1:They're launching products that directly compete with OpenAI. They have the TPU. They've really talked about this. And the transformer was invented at Google. So there's a whole bunch of history there around Google and AI.
Speaker 1:Everyone kind of expects that. Obviously, Zuck is doing the same thing. He made this massive bet. They've trained Llama. There's a huge narrative there.
Speaker 1:Zuck's completely driving that. They did the huge AI CapEx, the massive GPU buy. And then even in Microsoft, which is a little bit less focused on AI productization, obviously, they're stuffing, you know, copilots everywhere, but they have that massive position in OpenAI. So anytime OpenAI is in the news, you can talk to Satya. Whereas Amazon, they have deals with Anthropic.
Speaker 1:They host a lot of stuff. Obviously, there's Alexa, and there's AI in their products, but it's not as strong of a narrative. And a lot of it comes from the fact that they're no they're kind of no longer in founder mode. Like, Jeff Bezos is out. And Yeah.
Speaker 1:I was trying to understand, do you think Jeff Bezos goes back in the next four years? You think he does Yeah. As CEO?
Speaker 2:No. No. I just think it's a really interesting, you know, question and and conversation to be had. I bet I bet he wakes up some days just itching to be back, you know, behind the wheel of, one of the biggest ships in the world. Yep.
Speaker 2:It seems like there's there's there's quite a you know, looking at the core retail business, I I think it there's a lack of potential, like, real leadership in AI, and that's because you think about who goes on CNBC to talk about Amazon's AI prospects, and I can't name that person. And I talk about technology for three hours a day with you here on the show. Yep. And so that's that's probably a problem, and it just shows there's not, you know, we've seen this with Satya in many ways. He's going founder mode
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:Even though he didn't start the company. Right? Like, he is clearly the face and the leader of that company. And if he decided to leave, stock would drop, you know, I'm sure, you know, in a meaningful way. Then you have, Zuck obviously, doing his thing.
Speaker 2:You know, the other issue is the entire retail side of the business. I actually pulled up a post from Sean Frank, who we've had on the show probably a hundred times now. He has been talking for a very long time about how little new interest there is in selling on Amazon. You remember there was a time when everybody was selling courses on how you can make, you know, $5,000 a day selling on Amazon. You don't even need your own products.
Speaker 2:And so Amazon has gotten optimized and optimized and optimized, and they've just kept eating into the profits of the sellers on their platform. It's basically completely pay to play now. It's really hard to drive sales without spending a huge amount of your sales, of gross revenue on ads. So I just pulled this up. There's a post.
Speaker 2:This was from, a little, a week ago, actually. Sean says, why is interest in Amazon businesses collapse? One, the overall ecom market has collapsed. Almost no deals are being done, and those deals are 50% of what they would trade for in 2021. Solo stove was worth $2,000,000,000 at one point.
Speaker 2:It's worth under a hundred now. That sums up investor interest. Two, sales are stagnant. Amazon marketplace sales are, down single digits. That means the average merchant isn't growing all that much.
Speaker 2:No growth story, so there's even less interest. He says three, all the big buyers went bankrupt. So you remember, companies like, Thrasio, and then you have, like, kind of other alternatives like OpenStore that are playing more on the Shopify space.
Speaker 1:Mhmm.
Speaker 2:They aren't buying the same number of companies. And then the big thing is, the fees have, you know, increased so much that even if your revenue has doubled since 2021, your EBITDA is flat or down. So you're you you've doubled revenue, but your business is maybe worth less than what it was, you know, a few years ago. And so that is creating you know, it's definitely, like, seemingly, like, a lack of real, real leadership. Right?
Speaker 2:Because if they had proper leadership place and the proper narrative in place, if they said, hey, we are gonna be a real player in AI. We're gonna spend tens of billions of dollars on new infrastructure. Then that might be a bull case. Right? That might say, hey, they're gonna take one of their core business lines, and there's a real world where they, you know, multiply it.
Speaker 2:But we don't have that, and then we don't have, on the retail side, all the sellers are upset. No no seller on Amazon is saying, I'm so happy I built my entire business on Amazon. Right? They're getting competed by, you know, Chinese sellers. They're being knocked off.
Speaker 2:There's a bunch of trademark infringement that happens. I, one of my portfolio companies, LMNT, you know, had a copycat product on the platform that was the exact packaging, different name, but a carbon copy of the product. And Amazon let it run up to, you know, thousands and thousands and thousands of sales. I think they've dealt with it at this point, but it's a very hostile environment to be a seller. And we're not seeing, you know, real leadership on the on the cloud side.
Speaker 2:So, yeah, I don't know I don't know what to think. I think it's still a pretty good user experience on the on the platform. I my I think it's a great value exchange as a user from I pay, I don't know how many couple hundred dollars a year, and I get a bunch of content and free shipping, and that's great. But Yep. I think there's trouble on the retail side.
Speaker 2:And, because ultimately, Amazon's, you know, they're not you know, now they own inventory, but historically, it was a very, you know, inventory like model. And that's what one of the reasons that made it such a great business. And that's why Timu, it does, like, a meaningful amount of Amazon's, you know, net in, you know, profit from the retail business despite being a fraction of the size. And so I'm interested to see how it plays out. But if you're Bezos and you're looking at all of this and you say, I have this juggernaut, the thing that is, you know, the thing that he put his entire life into, and I could see him getting tired of yachts and, you know, hanging out with his, who his wife who, seems to be enamored by every celebrity that, you know, cross it cross they cross paths with, which has to be a lot.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:So, eventually, he might just decide, you know what? It's it's time to go founder mode. I also think that he clearly has more interest in Blue Origin now, and I like the fact that he and Elon seem to be more more, positive some now and supporting each other, which which is great to see as well. So who knows? But, but, yeah, it's a great great American company for the most part, and I'd like to see them, you know, really, take the reins and capitalize.
Speaker 1:Yep. I would love to see Bezos back at the helm. He clearly has an incredible amount of soft power at Amazon still and, probably could step in. I think what's very interesting I mean, I'd love to get a poly market up on, does Jeff Bezos go back this year and then roll that over to next year. I know a poly market doesn't do long dated things, but if you look at the timeline, Jeff Bezos stepped down in 2021.
Speaker 1:This was just almost immediately once Lena Khan came in and the Biden administration came in, and you could maybe read that as he was studying the history of Bill Gates at Microsoft. He lived through that. He was in Seattle when it happened. There's actually a ton of overlap between their families, I believe, and investors because of the Silicon Valley business community. And what happened in the, in the micro in the Microsoft case was Bill Gates was the richest man in the world and had a target on his back and became kind of a scapegoat for monopoly power and then dealt with this, like, really rough monopoly case.
Speaker 1:And even though it didn't destroy the company or really break up Microsoft in a meaningful way, I mean, they had to kind of disaggregate Internet Explorer from, from Windows. The company's still been massively successful. It's one of the biggest companies in the world. They got through it. But, when you when you listen to Bill Gates talk about it, he says it was, like, incredibly distracting, and it really ruined the job for him.
Speaker 1:And then he spent the next and then it kinda broke his brain because he spent the next twenty years just trying to kind of rehab his image through all these crazy philanthropies. And so you could imagine He's
Speaker 2:still trying to he's still trying to rehab his image, and and the most effective thing I've seen him done lately is he he did an interview Yes. And was photographed in a in a Bottega Veneta suit. I thought he looked fantastic. Yeah.
Speaker 1:I
Speaker 2:thought he looked cool. And so more of that and less, you know, running experimental vaccine programs on, you know, India. Yeah.
Speaker 1:He's also a big Porsche guy.
Speaker 2:Really?
Speaker 1:Oh, yeah. Huge Porsche guy. He, he was he it it was maybe, like, a little shot across the bat at Elon, but he was always like, I'm a take I'm a Taycan guy. You know, I don't do model s, which I think is a miss, but I think he also has, like, like a Carrera GT, a nine five nine, a nine eighteen. Probably he'll get the new one.
Speaker 1:And,
Speaker 2:it's I've been I've been, I've been driving a Taycan this week while while I'm in South Carolina, turbo s. Yeah. It is, it's a very fun car. It's Okay. Absolutely rips.
Speaker 2:Yeah. But, so I can see that.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And so, what I think about Bezos is, 2021, Lena Khan comes in. And remember, Lena Khan wrote her senior thesis, like her dick her dissertation on Amazon as a monopoly. And Amazon was not thought to, to be subject to, antitrust legislation because of the fact that it acts as an aggregator as Ben Thompson described in the sense that competition is only one click away. Their strength comes not from cornering supply.
Speaker 1:It comes from cornering demand. And what that means is that is that Amazon, they might be able to raise prices, but they never have. And so it's impossible to to to it's really, really difficult at least to prove consumer harm, which has always been the definition of we gotta break up this monopoly. It's one guy owns all the steel or all the railroads, and then because he owns all the steel, he can say, I'm doubling the price of steel, and everyone still has to buy. And and you can imagine that that's bad.
Speaker 1:It makes sense why we have antitrust legislation to prevent that type of stuff.
Speaker 2:In the case with Amazon, it's it's seller harm. And so sellers are pissed off. Sellers are are, you know, still able to eke out a business, but their businesses aren't growing in value.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:And so that's a major you know, again, it doesn't mean that that there's a strong antitrust case to be built there because as a consumer, I'm sitting here and I'm like, well, I pay 200 a month or $200 a year to Amazon. I get a bunch of content. I get, you know, free Whole Foods delivery. It's, you know, it's a pretty it's a pretty good exchange. So
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah.
Speaker 2:We'll see we'll see how it plays out. But with that
Speaker 1:And so 2021, Bezos steps down. This is, like, you know, within days or within a year of Lina Khan coming in. And then two years later, the FTC files, an antitrust lawsuit formally. And so Yeah. I think of it as the writing was on the wall.
Speaker 1:The Biden the Biden administration is gonna be very rough on me. If I duck out now as CEO, there's no scapegoat to go after, and it'll be much harder to rally, public support for an antitrust lawsuit because we won't be able to say, look at this multibillionaire. Look at the richest man in the world. He's extracting value. Everyone needs to support this.
Speaker 1:And that support, even though FTC lawsuits are not voted on by the American public, there is pressure that happens through various, elected representatives to the FTC. And it's a lot easier to go after someone who looks like, you know, Lex Luther than Andy Jassy, who's just a guy who no one really knows his name. And he's just there being like, yeah. We're obsessed with cloud computing, and it's actually a very, it's a very hot market, very competitive. And look at Amazon Yeah.
Speaker 1:Amazon. Yeah. We might be the biggest in cloud computing, but, Google Cloud is huge. Azure's huge. And Facebook's also investing in data centers in a massive way.
Speaker 1:And then there's a million other providers. So it's it's a complete, perfectly competitive market. Yes. We have great margins.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:But it's not it's not an option.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Now you have a bunch of new you you have new players like Stargate, and you can point to them and be like, look. They're they're investing $500,000,000,000 in their own. You know? So we're not
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:Banning new players from entering entering this market. It's still gonna be very competitive. Yeah.
Speaker 1:So And so with Linacon out, it kind of creates a space where Bezos could go back in if he wants. And I've always been interested in I I always love when the founders, have been able to set up their businesses in a way that they can do everything in the one master bucket. Zuck is the master of this. Like, he has the super voting shares. And so when he wants to do the metaverse, that goes in the meta bucket.
Speaker 1:When he wants to do AI, that goes in the meta bucket. Elon's taken a much more decentralized approach, but then he's decentralized with things like solar city getting bought by Tesla. XAI is integrated with x, and Tesla has some people over there. So he's kind of creating this of different companies that all have intertwined stakes. There's a lot of overlapping investors.
Speaker 1:People actually think about the portfolio of Elon companies as, like, Elon Inc now, and that's happening. It's not all one company.
Speaker 2:It's it's crazy to think that he could take just his personal positions public independently and create an index Oh, yeah. Elon. Yeah. And it would probably trade at at a five x premium to book value, you know, something ridiculous.
Speaker 1:Yep. But Bezos has always he's never been able to justify that fully. Like, he I think Amazon did one satellite Internet project, but they they weren't he wasn't able to go to the Amazon shareholders. Even though he has an immense amount of control, he was able to go to them and say, look. We could be making money on retail, but instead we're gonna invest all of that in AWS, and we're gonna have this amazing second business.
Speaker 1:He wasn't able to do that a third or fourth time. He could have said, hey. Look. We have a lot of delivery trucks. We wanna make electric delivery trucks, and so we're gonna build electric vehicles in house.
Speaker 1:But that's not what he did. Instead, he funded Rivian, and Rivian is kind of his Tesla. And that stock's been up and down, but Amazon built a position, and Bezos, like, helped with that a little bit. But he wasn't able to just do it inside. If Zuck needs trucks, he's gonna build them in Meta.
Speaker 1:You know? And he's not gonna start a second company. And same thing with Blue Origin. Like like, if Zuck wants to build rockets, it'll probably happen within meta because he has so much control and so much voting power there. And he's and he's been very good at, convincing the shareholders.
Speaker 1:So it'll be interesting to see I mean, I would be most I would I I would honestly probably be more excited about Blue Origin and Rivian if they lived within the Amazon holding structure, and Bezos was at the top of that and could really choose how to allocate capital. Because this this business, even though, you know, it's down a couple percent, it's throwing off so much money that they are going to invest a hundred billion dollars in capital expenditure next year. Like, that's probably way less than Rivian needs or Blue Origin needs. These could be Think about within Think about
Speaker 2:how good that would be for users if you could be driving in your Rivian and click for to do an Amazon haul and buy a $13, guitar or $13 couch.
Speaker 1:Right? A $20 couch. Yeah.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Exactly. That's what users want. Right? They want slot products while they're in their, you know, slot EV.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. I mean, at the same time, it it it makes sense why shareholders are like, wait. Like, I wanted to like, Zuck, I I'm here as a shareholder. I just want, like, ad dividends.
Speaker 1:Like, why are you open sourcing LLMs? Like, I don't care about that. And Zuck has to make the argument that, oh, well, it'll help with talent, and it helps with our it's commoditizing our compliments, and, oh, we'll be able to stuff this and everything, and we'll have, you know, stake in AI. And it's obviously gone very well. But even as a CEO who controls a massive public company, you do still have to make your case to shareholders.
Speaker 1:You can't just say, I have a wild idea. I have no idea how it connects, and I'm gonna do it anyway. People have to say, hey. It's gonna make money for the core business. Yeah.
Speaker 1:But Amazon I mean, it really is interesting your point about them not being, like, leading the AI narrative because they are leading the AI narrative. They're spending a hundred billion dollars in CapEx this year, in as part of a push to build generative AI services.
Speaker 2:They're they're leading the investment in CapEx.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:They're not they're not
Speaker 1:They're not leading the narrative.
Speaker 2:Yep. And I think that narrative just matters so much for a company, you know, that that, you know, every company is in the game of we want our, you know, pry the for the average, you know, retail investor that owns Amazon, they want the, you know, they want the everybody wants the price to go up. And so I think that they're not getting, credit for that CapEx from a, you know, market cap standpoint.
Speaker 1:100%. And so, let's just break down how Amazon compares to the other hyperscalers. It really is fascinating. You know, Sate has that quote. I'm good for my 80,000,000,000.
Speaker 1:Well, now that has actually increased. Amazon, Microsoft is expected to top 90,000,000,000 in CapEx this calendar year. Google is spending 75,000,000,000, and Meta is spending 65,000,000,000. And so you add all that up, you're in some huge, huge territory, 350,000,000,000, something like that. Pretty, pretty crazy numbers, but, you know, it's a lot of data centers.
Speaker 1:I'm excited to see it. And and and it's to me another trillion to one another trillion to Nvidia. Woo hoo.
Speaker 2:Yeah. We we need to do a a data we need to do a data center, to
Speaker 1:Oh, map.
Speaker 2:You know?
Speaker 1:For sure. For sure. And so US tech stocks tumbled last week after the surprise success of a new generative AI model from China. That's, of course, deep seek. The free to use model was built at a fraction of the cost, although very debatable at this point.
Speaker 1:The latest number I saw was, like, they spent 1,500,000,000.0, which is, like, more than it cost to train GPT four. And so now we're in, like, weird territory.
Speaker 2:Yeah. They spent 1,500,000,000.0 while horrifically, stealing, from from OpenAI. Yeah. In order to and then and then, you know, lying about it.
Speaker 1:I'm actually very confused about the real number here because it started as 6,000,000, then people said, well, they have other stuff, and it doesn't include r and d. And even DeepSeek admitted, like, we didn't include all the cost. And so people were like, okay. Maybe it's 50,000,000. Maybe it's a hundred million.
Speaker 1:It's still impressive. They clearly did a bunch of optimizations to make the code run faster, and there's just no question that inference is cheaper. Like, that is true. We know that. But now we're getting these crazy estimates.
Speaker 1:Like, actually, DeepSeek has invested 1,500,000,000.0 in AI as a whole project. But then on the other end, you're hearing, like, oh, a couple kids at Stanford rebuilt it for $50. And so Yeah. We're now, like, in the bands of, like, deep seek spent a billion, but Stanford can do it for $50. I don't know what to believe anymore.
Speaker 1:It's crazy.
Speaker 2:I love I love how they just inspired America to grind harder. Everybody everybody was like, oh, it's possible to train a model like this for Yeah.
Speaker 1:You know,
Speaker 2:very, very, little comparable cost. We should just do it, and then they do it. So
Speaker 1:I love it. I love it. Well, and so, obviously, that shook markets. Amazon CEO, Jassy, wants to make Amazon an AI leader as the world he needs to do more podcasts, though. He needs to start setting the narrative.
Speaker 1:Call Lulu. Go direct.
Speaker 2:Call Lulu.
Speaker 1:As the world's largest cloud service provider, the company is in a good position to profit from AI. Amazon created special teams, created special teams to, let's see, create special teams to drive generative AI innovation and has released a fury of services, including an AI shopping assistant. First time I'm learning of that. I've heard that they have an AI chatbot that you can
Speaker 2:chat with. It's so funny their shopping assistant for the consumer is, yeah, we're just gonna find you the products that you really want. And then on the back end, they're just telling all the retailers, yeah, you're gonna have to give up 90% of your margin to get this customer, and you're gonna love it. Yeah. Otherwise, you know, somebody else will will will pay for that slot.
Speaker 2:So
Speaker 1:And and so the the Wall Street Journal highlights, Amazon's competitiveness in the ecommerce business with new rivals such as Timu and Xi'an. Both of these companies offer low prices to source products extensively from China. President Trump suspended a trade exemption known as the de minimis provision that Xi'an and Timu and other Amazon competitors have used to avoid import duties on low value packages from China. We've covered this before. And we and, honestly, we never thought that it was putting a dent in Amazon's, revenues because a lot of the slop products that were bought on Timu and Sheehan were incremental, and it was seen more as gambling dollars than really replacing or displacing Amazon as as a staple Yeah.
Speaker 1:Of the American consumers, consumer habits. So, unclear how big of an issue Timu and Sheehan have been historically. They're certainly on their back foot now, and it seems like Amazon's even even better positioned. I mean, a lot of this, although the stock traded down, it there's a lot of bullish stuff in here. Like, they've they've they've they've they've like, there's no more FTC risk with Linacon out.
Speaker 1:They they're they're potentially killing off Timo and Sheen, and and they're spending the most on AI data centers. So if you believe that having having a lot of data centers and a lot of GPUs is valuable, they're in the best position. Now not by a lot. They're only spending 10% more than than Microsoft, but it's still a lot, and they got a lot of stuff under The US. It's great.
Speaker 2:And it and to be clear, the stock is not under performing by any means. They were down on earnings, but I'm on public, and they are up 5% ish in the last month. So Yeah. Not not a bad spot to be in. But I
Speaker 1:think they're up 40% last year, which is crazy for a company that big.
Speaker 2:Yeah. That's bad. They were not a they were not a trillion dollar company in 2020.
Speaker 1:Wow.
Speaker 2:In yeah. So right at yeah. If you bought if you bought Amazon the day that the NBA, you know, basically went offline, it was like a $900,000,000,000 company. Right? Wow.
Speaker 2:So anyways, still doing well despite Bezos not at the helm, but, imagine imagine the move if Bezos did join the company. The the the the pop would be, biblical.
Speaker 1:For sure. For sure. And so separately during the important holiday quarter, Amazon grappled with threats from one of the largest US labor unions, and I love their name, although I'm not a fan of them personally. The International Brotherhood of Teamsters. I I know the Teamsters Union.
Speaker 1:I didn't know that was their full name. We should start an international brotherhood of technologists. They tried to disrupt holiday deliveries to pressure Amazon to negotiate with its warehouse workers. At the time, the company said those attempts had, fallen short, I I I guess. And so Amazon got through that.
Speaker 1:I also wanted to go back and look at a little bit of, older, earnings analysis from Ben Thompson. This is from 2023 talking about Amazon and AI, and, and Ben Thompson is highlighting the the the lack of clear narrative. And so, Jassy, at the time back in 2023, he says generative AI has captured people's imagination, but most people are talking about the application layer, specifically what OpenAI has done with ChatGPT. It's important to remember that we're in the very early days of adoption and the success of generative AI and that consumer applications are only one layer of opportunity. And so three of the five big tech companies have a clear AI story at this point.
Speaker 1:Microsoft has its partnership with OpenAI. Google has its own AI models and Google Cloud Platform. And Meta is pursuing open source strategy in conjunction with seeking partnerships with large cloud providers, starting with Microsoft. That leaves Apple and Amazon who have may underperformed on the narrative front.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And so here's the thing. So Amazon made its bet on Anthropic, and Anthropic has built a great model. People love Claude, but is kind of irrelevant on the consumer side. They have, you know, a fraction of the downloads and the engagement that OpenAI does.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:And they don't have a reasoning model right now.
Speaker 1:They do. It's just internal. They haven't launched it.
Speaker 2:That's what I'm saying. I don't I don't care. They don't have a cons they don't have a I you don't get credit for, oh, yeah. We we got we got a we got a great like, the whole thing with with all these, you know, foundation model, you know, companies is they're launching products oftentimes before they're really ready for production. Right?
Speaker 2:They launch deep research, and you didn't even have access to it. Right? So everybody's sort of running. I believe if an Anthropics model was actually competitive, they would have launched it already.
Speaker 1:Yeah. So it it is clearly a very
Speaker 2:different And they and the other thing is they made Anthropic made it clear bet around AI safety. And a lot of other firms ignored that. DeepSeek, one of them. And so, that seems to be in the short term the wrong bet to make. And so that was that was Amazon's real, you know, player in the race.
Speaker 2:And and I think that, or at least consumer narrative, and it's turning out that Anthropic doesn't seem to have a strong consumer narrative right now even though people love the product.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I
Speaker 2:mean, it's crazy personally. I haven't personally used Claude in in weeks. So,
Speaker 1:Yeah. I mean, it seems like it has popularity amongst the developer community, but beyond that, it hasn't really broken through. And it's fascinating to see how aggressive Sam has been at OpenAI about responding to just any developments. You know, every time Google has a keynote, OpenAI has a keynote two days before. And deep, deep seat comes out.
Speaker 1:What what what's the name of the product he launches? Deep research. Like, he wants the Google auto filled, AI deep something. Oh, yeah. Deep research.
Speaker 1:Go over here. And Yeah. You can tell the deep research I mean, I I've been enjoying the product, and I think it's getting a lot better. But you can tell that they're not ready to scale that for a few reasons. First, it's not available on mobile.
Speaker 1:So the the button is just not available there. So you have to if you're on your phone, you have to open up a web browser and go to chatgpt.com and then click the deep research thing to do a query on mobile. So they're clearly cutting the amount of, deep research queries that way. And then also, it always asks you a clarifying question to slow you down, and I'm sure there's some sort of churn rate between, oh, oh, I was about to kick off this deep research thing, but it asked me a bunch of clarifying questions. Maybe I'm not gonna do it.
Speaker 1:And if that saves them 50% of the of the queries, that's a lot of compute because, clearly, it's very, very expensive. But it it shows that that they're they're willing to push it out and get the data they can and and do as much scaling as they can even though they're not ready for this to be free for everyone ad supported and billions of of inferences Yeah. That are just burning up, data centers every
Speaker 2:single day. All of this stuff, DeepSeek coming out and and people responding to it and and, you know, it's kind of showing that, we may be at least a few models away from from the sort of asymmetric risk that anthropic has been, you know, focused on. And so it seems to have been so far, at least for these early reasoning models that that aren't fully, you know, agentic, it does seem that, they kinda made the wrong bet there.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It'll be it'll be interesting to see how it plays out. Maybe Bezos gets in there and put some pressure on them and put their feet to the fire and says, give me the models. They're going out today. But let's close with, Ben Thompson's analysis.
Speaker 1:This is again from two years ago talking about Amazon's play in AI, and he has some, he has an anecdote. Ben writes, I'm wrapping up my usual summer stint in The US, in a metro area that started receiving same day deliveries earlier this year. Speaking personally, I absolutely agree with Jassy's characterization of consumer behavior. I both found Amazon's delivery speed to be astounding and also recognize a significant shift in my own behavior because of that speed. The truth is that buying something locally in person still requires a trip of some sort with that with the risk that what you want may not be in stock is in almost all cases, it was actually faster, particularly once you incorporate the realities of life where you can't actually go to the store this very minute because things come up to simply order from Amazon because you'll receive your item in a matter of hours, not days indeed.
Speaker 1:Felt I felt this summer marked the largest shift in my purchasing behavior since the launch of Prime. When I needed something like, say, a mic cable, which happened last Sunday, I simply bought it on Amazon the moment the need arose. The cable arrived four hours later. What I find so fascinating about this, though, is Jassy's argument that this actually results in lower unit costs because there are fewer touch points for the delivery. This does not make intuitive sense in that it is a classic tech trade off between marginal cost and fixed cost.
Speaker 1:It is also a tangible expression of why I thought it was so important for Amazon to push for this level of delivery speed in the first place. Amazon is at its best when it's realizing advantages that no one else can match because of its willingness to invest in the real world. This is what Amazon does best.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:And focus on long term motes and, and, and instead of instead of short term profitability, that's what leads to increased profitability in the long run. If you're patient enough and confident in your position with consumers, will will endure, Amazon's renewed interest in its logistics is a perfect example and an encouraging sign that the company will will retain its greatness without its earnings call skipping founder because Bezos didn't go to the earnings call, which I think is funny. Anyway, Jordy, what you got?
Speaker 2:Yep. I would just kind of close this out by saying Amazon generally seem is very well positioned for a lot of the trends that we're seeing right now. Some of these other, you know, companies that are more pure play software companies that aren't existing in the real world, there's some real threats there. Right? Software development timelines are changing so dramatically.
Speaker 2:It's becoming so much faster and cheaper to make software That threatens a company like Salesforce in a way that Amazon, which is selling physical products, selling content, selling you know, they have their logistics network. They have their data center business. They they should be people should be tremendously excited about Amazon's positioning for the next ten years. And, yeah, they're somehow not getting that through. So, anyways, excited to keep covering it.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's it's an interesting story. Seems mostly, narrative and communications based, but we'll see. Fortunately, you know, stocks up 40% over the last year. Minor minor bump in the road with this earnings.
Speaker 1:A little bit of scared on the CapEx. A little bit of deep sea threat, but we'll see where it goes. Let's move on to our next top story. We have a technology brothers exclusive where the for the first time in technology brothers history, we're covering an Eric newcomer exclusive on general catalysts fundraising. And so we have slides here from Eric newcomer, showing how general catalyst has performed, how they've scaled, and Eric newcomer has the firm's q three twenty twenty three fundraising documents.
Speaker 1:And general catalyst is on a tear. They are just going big. Ultimate size lords. Let's hit the size gong a couple times for them. They're just Yeah.
Speaker 2:And and they even
Speaker 1:have some
Speaker 2:I don't think this article would have caught it, but they came out yesterday announcing they have a new fund of funds platform to fund other emerging managers. So they're just going I love, we love when people get aggressive, and they're certainly doing that.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I mean, the narrative around, around general catalyst has been, it was a VC firm, then it was a growth stage firm, then it was a private equity firm. Now it's just an asset manager in every sense of the word. I think they also launched a wealth management product. Right?
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Did you see that? Yeah. Yeah. And so, they have a hospital, consumer value financing, a wealth manager under the leadership of CEO, Hamant Tanaja. The firm has grand ambitions.
Speaker 1:Newcomer got his hands on documents that show how General Catalyst has presented itself to prospective investors. The documents, he obtained are amid are admittedly a little dated from 2023. It's a bit old, newcomer. Gotta step it up.
Speaker 2:It's good.
Speaker 1:Gotta be hanging out at the Sandhill, the Sandhill Rosewood a little bit more.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Or the Nobu, the Rashomonas. Nobu.
Speaker 1:Hanging out. You know?
Speaker 2:I wanna see I wanna see I wanna see a tech journalist go to Japan, study how to make sushi for ten years, and then go get a job at Nobu and just sit at the sushi bar. You're just making sushi. Everybody thinks you're just, you know, making a nice hand roll. Turns out you're listening for scoops. You're picking up every single thing that they say.
Speaker 2:You're yelling, Arashima Sei. Arashima Sei. Then you're really you got your ears both ears here because you got a bunch of allocators right in front of you. You know, you're picking up this round's happening, that round's happening. Maybe a faster way to do that would just be to go pay off the individual, you know, the the wait staff, the sushi the sushi, chefs, etcetera.
Speaker 2:But there's alpha everywhere, folks.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:And there's certainly alpha in the Palo Alto Nobu.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Newcomer become a janitor at Aman and then just go around and just sweep up all the slide decks that are laying around the pool and the jacuzzi and the spa and just, scan them, throw them up on the newsletter. You're going to triple subscriptions. You're going to be printing 5,000,000 next year in EBITDA. It's gonna you're playing small ball right now.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And so, the investment memo provides a detailed look at general catalyst strategy and performance as it was raising its last suite of venture funds. And so let's go through some of these. They are absolute dog's general catalyst. Billions raised in October 2024, the firm announced $8,000,000,000 of new funds for its fund 12.
Speaker 1:Been around for a long time, including 4,500,000,000.0 for the firm's core VC funds, 1,500,000,000.0 for its creation strategy, and 2,000,000,000 for separately managed accounts.
Speaker 2:1 and a half billion for I'm reading that as incubations. Is that correct?
Speaker 1:I think so.
Speaker 2:1 and a half billion for incubations is insane. That's just an insane number given given how given how, capital efficient incubations can be because, you know, sometimes firm will put, you know, a founder as an EIR, so they have a bit of an income and benefits while they figure out what to build. I I have no idea how it's actually structured. But,
Speaker 1:Well, their latest incubation was a roll up, and so they wound up buying a lot of existing firms. And so you could imagine if you're if you're buying, like, a midsized business dropping AI on top of it, yeah, it's gonna be a hundred million equity check and then a couple million hundred million in debt maybe. That's gonna go pretty quickly. That's 15 deals if you're doing hundred million dollar checks to kick off these, like, incubation roll up type things. Yeah.
Speaker 1:I have no idea how they're how they're sizing their bets, but, I'm sure we'll find out more. Let's go to, the evolution in '20 in in '2 in the year February, the firm started in Boston founded by serial entrepreneurs David Falco and Joel Cutter during the dot com bubble. General Catalyst established, credibility. Let's see. They hatched winning companies resulting in Kayak Demandware and Virtu.
Speaker 1:Fund five in 02/2007 was $722,000,000 already pretty big. During the global financial crisis, they expanded to Silicon Valley in 2010 and New York in 2012. They did a fund six of $500,000,000. Fund 7 was $676,000,000. Every, every fund is just getting bigger and bigger.
Speaker 1:Ken Chenault, who I've actually interviewed, ramp investor, former CEO of Amex. He joins the chairman. And then in 2018, General Catalyst solidifies a full stack platform by raising multiple funds segmented by stage. This is the Fund ten group. Fund ten comes in at 2,900,000,000.0.
Speaker 1:General catalyst raises its first sector specific fund, the health assurance fund. Hamant becomes CEO. They open a London office in 2021 post COVID and fund eleven clocks in at 5,400,000,000.0, baby. And so there's a little bit of a breakdown here for fund twelve. They have their creation, fund, which hatches companies transforming companies with a catalyst advisor and execute and executing venture buyouts.
Speaker 2:1.5 So that's so that's interesting. So it's their creation fund, but it's a venture buyout
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:Strategy. So that makes sense.
Speaker 1:Trying to own 25% of the business when they do
Speaker 2:to deploy 1 and a half billion when you're creating, you know, precede companies, and presumably making room for other investors too. Yep. It's impossible. Difficult.
Speaker 1:But they're gonna buy they're they're they're they're gonna buy companies like their private equity firm, but where they think there is VC like opportunity and venture scale. And so they have the Ignition Fund. This is where they do their core early stage work. Another 1,500,000,000.0 there. They focus on seed series a, series b.
Speaker 1:And, of course, they focus in in 10 to 25% ownership target there. They have their health assurance fund, which is targeted at digital transformation of the health care industry. 750,000,000, early stage seed series a, series b in health care, ten to 25% ownership targets. And then they have their endurance fund. That's their growth and later stage investments, 2,250,000,000.00.
Speaker 1:And this is all out of fund 12. And so, they've taken this full stack approach. You can look at some of their leadership here. They focus on basically everything, health care, fintech, global resilience, technology, consumer, and enterprise. And we can go through more of, the slides, but you might just wanna subscribe to newcomer.
Speaker 1:The guy gets scoops even if they're Yeah.
Speaker 2:You're not old. Always scooping. Always scooping. Yeah. An absolute dog.
Speaker 1:Is there anything else we should talk about with regard to general catalyst? We got some boys over there, some absolute dogs, writing huge checks, making plays.
Speaker 2:No. I time on. You know, some every time a venture fund comes out and announces multiple billion dollars of new, AUM, there's always, naysayers, haters saying, oh, this is not, you know, this is not real venture capital or, you know, how are you gonna actually put up returns like this? But you have to just give people a little bit of credit. If somebody's raising $8,000,000,000, unless they're Masa Son, they have probably planned things out pretty precisely.
Speaker 2:They've probably have a very coherent strategy because that kind of money doesn't change hands and get invested without, you know, the the people that are investing those dollars are sophisticated. And, yeah, they're taking a portfolio approach. They don't need every fund they invest in to to outperform. But, yeah, gotta give, credit. And I and I like to see that general catalyst is getting aggressive and evolving venture.
Speaker 2:It's not a cottage industry anymore. I think that the super, super early stage stuff will continue to be, somewhat boutique, and there's always gonna be opportunities for new managers. But, you know, the bifurcation, venture from these sort of small 10 to $50,000,000 funds all the way to these, like, 5 to $20,000,000,000 funds or 5 to $10,000,000,000 funds, that is seemingly the new normal. And I think it's overall healthy. It's important for early stage investors to know that, you know, if I invest in a company at at a 5 to $10,000,000 valuation, that if they do well, there's gonna be, you know, $50,000,000,000 of downstream capital that somebody like a GC or an Andreessen or a founder's fund, or Sequoia can can deploy into that.
Speaker 2:So overall, I think it's healthy. I think there's gonna be a, you know, an entirely it's gonna be cool to see that the generation of, of investors, allocators that come out of firms like General Catalyst that were there during the transformation and then can continue to innovate down the road. So Yeah. Overall, very cool. And, you know, look, they're probably doing a few hundred million ARR just on the fee side.
Speaker 1:Yeah. So the the the old model of two and twenty is gone. VC firms used to take 2% annual management fees and 20% carry, but not a general catalyst, baby. The firm share of profits on investments starts at 25% and climbs to 30% if the profits are above a 33 in aggregate contributions. And so a lot of these a lot of these, different funds have different, management fee structures.
Speaker 1:The creation fund gets 2.5% management fee. The ignition fund gets 2.25. Endurance is their growth fund, so a little bit lower. 1.75% management fee. And the health assurance fund gets 2.5% management fees.
Speaker 1:So Eric newcomer clocks it at a hundred and $20,000,000 a year just from fund 12. And remember, they're raising these new funds every couple years. And so Yeah. That's gonna fund a lot of employees, a lot of office space, and a lot of ski trips to Tahoe and Sun Valley.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And one one thing to note, yesterday, we will probably talk about this later in the show, but yesterday, some news broke, I think, from Bloomberg that Trump was exploring, eliminating what what has been called the carried interest tax loophole. Yep. And, I think that loophole is a sort of not the best way to characterize it because the what they're referring to is the fact that, investors, that are, you know, people that manage and deploy money that's not necessarily their own, they get when they you know, if you have a $10,000,000 fund and it does well and you're in carry, that carry gets you know, has has historically been treated and and today gets treated as capital gains. What they're trying to do is make it treated, more like ordinary income.
Speaker 2:So instead of paying a, you know, fifteen, twenty ish percent tax rate, whatever it is, you might be paying, closer to to 50% tax rate on that. And so for someone like GC who's deploying billions of dollars and presumably wants to make a great return on that, that's billions of dollars that they would be giving to the federal government, or the state government depending, you know, on their performance. So, pretty, would be pretty brutal for the industry in many ways, but it's coming from somebody like Trump who runs his own money. So, as a real estate guy, he's using his money. I'm sure he has co investors, and and using a lot of debt.
Speaker 2:But to him, it it, you know, maybe is not so important how carried interest is is treated. But if you're a fund manager raising, you know, billions or if you're you're a fund manager that's raising 10,000,000 and really making money on on the carry piece versus the fee side, would be pretty, devastating.
Speaker 1:So Yeah. The, the carried interest, loophole closure, this whole discussion, that came up during the last administration didn't go anywhere. You said that if it goes through, VCs will make January 6 look like a baby shower. I think we could see lots of VC and private equity associates protesting on the National Mall. If this happens, it'd be very bad for the industry.
Speaker 1:And, who else said something interesting? I forget who it was. Dan Primack. Dan Primack says a source on the phone just now on the carried interest tax situation is like the red wedding. Trump collected all the VCs at the White House so he could more easily murder them.
Speaker 1:And so,
Speaker 2:Yeah. And and, to be clear, it's it's not gonna be the end of the world, but it does meaningfully impact. You know, when I look at it as, like, you know, from time to time, I'll do an SPV into a company that I'm excited about. And now I have to if they do change the law and the and the tax treatment right now, you know, if I invest, you know, a million dollars, be an SPV, I take 20% carry on it. Maybe there's other partners in the deal, so I'm not actually getting the full 20% carry.
Speaker 2:After it's taxed 50%, it might not have even been worth my time to do the deal. I might have been better off just putting in, you know, $50 myself, letting it ride, and knowing that it's gonna be treated like, because because putting together money like that via an SPV, it's a lot of work. It's super time intensive. And so, you know, you're basically looking at the the way that I've always looked at it as you're investing in the deal with your time. And so from that lens, it's saying, okay, maybe it should be treated, like ordinary income, but the payoff is so unclear, and it takes so long to see a payout.
Speaker 2:And you only see a payoff a payout if, you know, there's a a meaningful return. And so, I see a good argument to keep it as is. I don't think it should be framed as a loophole, but, we'll see how it plays out.
Speaker 1:And so, manifold markets, I don't know if how up to date this is, but they are running a market on carried interest repeal by the end of twenty twenty six. It's a yes 40%, no 60%. I imagine that's pretty low liquidity. Med Faber here Med Faber here, who actually follows me, says, we need a poly market on the chances of carried interest LOL, close the carried interest tax deduction loophole. So everyone wants to know whether or not this will happen.
Speaker 1:It could just be one of those things where, like, Trump is doing with Canada. Oh, we're gonna make Canada state this and that. He Canada, Trump loves to open with a crazy proposal and then back it off and and get something in trade. And so I could imagine this saying, look. I'm gonna close the carried interest loophole, blow up your entire industry.
Speaker 1:But as this gets now that I brought everyone to the negotiating table and people realize how serious I am, Trump will say, well, actually, I'm gonna close the carried interest loophole on investments that are made outside of The United States. Or and and and, really, his goal the whole time has been, I just want VCs to invest in American companies that make products in America. And you could see that being more aligned, and that's actually what he's going for. But how does he get there? Well, he's gotta come in with a hammer and get everyone woke waking up and saying, look.
Speaker 1:It's gonna be the red wedding. There's gonna be a bloodbath unless you play ball. And then, you know, he set the bar here. And so when he backs down, he gets exactly what he wants. And so I could see that happening, and maybe that maybe that would be good for America.
Speaker 1:It's possible.
Speaker 2:Let art of the deal.
Speaker 1:Let art of the deal. Okay. Let's go through some timeline. And, Ben, if there's any questions or reviews you want us to read, send those to the chat and I'll cut over to Jordy, as we go through. But first, we got a promoted post from one of the favorite companies on the channel.
Speaker 1:I'll let you take this Jordy.
Speaker 2:Those that don't know, I'm a cofounder of Aurora. Aurora makes beautiful, easy to use highly effective water filters. I just thought this was a cool shot. Brian CEO, posted this yesterday. It's just showing the same exact tap water coming out of NYC pipes, one on the left going through Aurora, one on the right just sitting there, and you can just see the difference.
Speaker 2:You can see the contamination of the water. So if you're drinking tap water, you've got, heavy metals, pharmaceuticals, tons of stuff in it that you just don't wanna be drinking. It's absolutely insane to drink tap water. I, simply, I I haven't I I drank tap water once in literally the last, like, five years, and it was actually at David Senra's event. Not to throw David under the bus or anything, but, I got back to my room, and it was at a, you know, it was at this really cool retreat center and I was like, probably like a twenty minute walk from where I could get water.
Speaker 2:And I didn't even know if it was open. So I drank tap water. I was like, it was, it was in Austin, which has notoriously bad tap water. And I was like, this is egregiously bad. Spit it out and just ended up, you know, going to bed thirsty.
Speaker 1:Oh, no.
Speaker 2:But, but, anyways, filter your water. Aurora makes good filters. Highly recommend you check them out and and feel free to, DM me if you have any questions on it.
Speaker 1:Fantastic.
Speaker 2:And one, I've had multiple calls now with technology brothers listeners where I popped into the call, and they already had the Aurora in the background. Fantastic. Very, very awesome, moment. Thank you for the support.
Speaker 1:You love to see it. Well, we got some, major personnel news in the world of AI. OpenAI cofounder John Shulman is joining Miramarati's startup after a brief stint at Anthropic. The trade deal is like the NFL.
Speaker 2:The holy trinity right here.
Speaker 1:Yeah. The holy trinity. It really is like the NFL. I mean, these these guys are bouncing around like crazy, and you never know if it's like, oh, it's AI safety. It was too dangerous.
Speaker 1:They were just too reckless, or it was just like, hey. I just didn't like working with those people, or I wasn't getting comped right, or, you know, some deal fell through. I wanted a different thing, or I wanted to be more product focused or more research focused, but everyone's excited about Mira, former
Speaker 2:Look at the look at the pressure that Sam is under. Elon's attacking him. Two, two of his former cofounders, Ilya and Mira, both have competing startups. He's competing with Anthropic, DeepSeek. Yep.
Speaker 2:It's it's not so often that I mean, it happens, right, where you have a group of cofounders that build a big company and then one leaves and starts a competitor. But not in a while, and I certainly not in my memory can I think of a time when a relatively new company that was already a multibillion dollar company had two cofounders leave that each now have their own billion dollar companies that are generally competing for the same opportunities? I think Ilya was in the news today this morning that he's raised, potentially raising new money at a $20,000,000,000 valuation. And so It's got it. People are clearly bullish on the OpenAI founding team.
Speaker 2:And this is a big win for Mira because you can imagine that John could have gone to to Ilya, to Ilya's company as well. And, so anyways, it's this is just a great time to be in the technology temple that is our studio and my remote studio. I love Yeah.
Speaker 1:It's it's fantastically dramatic. The the the weird thing that I never understood was, like, these departures always framed as, like, indictments of OpenAI, and yet it's like, okay. So you guys all don't like OpenAI, but you also don't like each other because otherwise, you'd all just start a company together, and you all started separate companies. And so clearly, like, the infighting at these companies is just crazy in in many ways that we like, the internal politics are much more complex than just, like, oh, there's two sides to this issue because, like, why why aren't Mira and Ilya working together? Why did John Shulman leave Anthropic?
Speaker 1:Like like, you would think that they would just be, like, the o the open AI and the anti open AI. But instead, it's like, there's the anti
Speaker 2:open AI
Speaker 1:and then there's a different one. And there this one's more about safety and this one's more about this and product and stuff. But either way, it's gonna mean a lot of great AI products, and I'm excited to try them all and let's see what happens.
Speaker 2:Yeah. It's really a crazy time. I mean, when the the pitch with AI right now, the reason to invest in a pre revenue company at a $20,000,000,000 valuation is presumably because there's trillions of dollars on the line. Yep. And so that's causing, you know, individuals to say, hey.
Speaker 2:I can go join this company. I could go on a vacation, or I could raise a one on $5,000,000,000 pre seed round. And that's that's pretty sweet.
Speaker 1:Let's go. And so I think there's actually somebody else that's joining Mira's company. I know Dylan Patel was tweeting about this saying that he was very excited about the startup and, and and thought that the talent aggregation was very impressive. Still, I'm I'm mostly excited to see, like, how is the product going to take shape or be different? Obviously, there's a lot of difference.
Speaker 1:There's already fragmentation at the model layer. Obviously, we see that within OpenAI's model drop downs. There's reasoning models. There's web searching models. There's AI models, code models.
Speaker 1:And so I would
Speaker 2:Using open using OpenAI right now is is like opening up, you know, a drawer in your desk that you just use to just jam, you know, jam a bunch of old papers in, and you're trying to look for one. And you're, like, just sometimes you wanna just give up and, you know, slam the door back shut. But,
Speaker 1:they'll
Speaker 2:that's easier to figure out how to name your products than Yeah.
Speaker 1:I was thinking about how messy the naming scheme is, and I was like, this is bad. But at the same time, I think it could be worse, honestly, if they tried to give them all, like, cutesy branded names. Like, imagine if it was just, like, apple, pear, banana, like like, sprinkles, like, ice cream. I know. Which one's which?
Speaker 1:At least I I know, like, o o one zero three. Like, o three is a bigger number, therefore, it's better. And I can at least, like, click
Speaker 2:on that one. And I'm sure OpenAI's plan internally is you won't pick the model yourself. You'll ask what you you'll tell it to to help you with something, and it will just route it to the best model
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:Based on the ask. And so, yeah, maybe it's, like, you know, very temporary.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It seems very solvable. That doesn't seem like an intractable problem whatsoever. Anyway Alright.
Speaker 2:We got some questions in the chat. I just wanted
Speaker 1:through them. What you got for me?
Speaker 2:Elliot asked, can you guys go over Caterpillar earnings? That's a good question. I know nothing about Caterpillar's business, but I love, I love, I love the products that they make. Every time I I drive by one with my son, he he he calls it out. So maybe we should do Caterpillar earnings.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. I I love that. Yeah. Ben, can you put that in the in the group chat for, for deep dives?
Speaker 1:We'll we'll
Speaker 2:be doing Caterpillar. I would love to figure out how Caterpillar's benefiting from all the AI CapEx because you could imagine Yeah. If you have, you know, hundreds of billions of new data centers that need to get built, like, that's potentially, you know, a a big growth channel. So great call out, Elliot. We'll look into it.
Speaker 2:And and if it's relevant Yeah. We'll definitely cover it. Amit says when's the annual IPO? I don't think we can
Speaker 1:They said not this year publicly. I think they said not 2025. But I'm sure there'll be plenty of exciting news, between now and then. Stay tuned. And we promoted an annual job posting yesterday.
Speaker 1:So, you know, if you want exposure pre IPO, you gotta put in the work. You gotta just go to work there. The underrated way to get allocation into these companies is just go in
Speaker 2:No worries.
Speaker 1:And exercise your options immediately.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. No. It is probably easier right now to get a job at Anduril than buy Anduril secondary.
Speaker 1:I was scrolling their jobs page. They have, like, a thousand jobs up. It's it's it's crazy how many jobs they had. I thought it would be, like, oh, like a quick scroll. It was like pages and pages and pages of jobs.
Speaker 1:Yeah. So, get on your grind, polish up that LinkedIn, polish up that resume, start, you know, being a reply guy to every employee.
Speaker 2:In your cover letter, tell them the technology brother sent you.
Speaker 1:Exactly.
Speaker 2:Another question from f s f s f f r f, which I presumably was he just slammed it in there to try to get a use username going. He says, is this live? And the answer is yes. We're speaking to you live now. There's maybe a five second delay, but very live.
Speaker 2:We got another question from five five two three. What are your thoughts on The UK's prospects for the future tech wise? That's a better question for Harry Stebbings. He's on a mission to to make, to make Europe great again. So I'm wearing a shirt that that looked, that that had that on it.
Speaker 2:And, yeah, I I I can't really, like, speak too clearly. I mean, I think that Europe has a lot of issues around tech regulation right now. I think part of the reason that the Figma deal didn't go through was they were facing pressure from European regulators, even though Adobe and Figma are both US companies. They seem to have a number of issues. You know, looking at the data, there's maybe only a small handful of companies that have been started in Europe in the last, like, fifty years that are in the top hundred biggest companies in Europe.
Speaker 2:And so that just tells you that it's a tough environment to innovate in and create companies from zero to one. And so there's been some successes. The standout successes are are the neobanks. I forget the name of the one that that has done well over there. But overall, you know and and the other thing is Andreessen actually had made a big push into London around crypto because London was historically a finance a global sort of financial center, still is.
Speaker 2:And they the the UK government was making a push to create more friendly regulations around crypto, and Andreessen opened an office over there for that. But overall, I would say that if you want to build a high growth tech company and have the best chances of success, you're still better off, you know, moving to America or The Bay.
Speaker 1:Yeah. If you look at the if you look at some historical data, I think from the top 20 largest companies by market cap, 100% of them have been created in US and China.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And I
Speaker 1:think it's like I think it's like eighty twenty US. Yeah. And so, unfortunately, Europe's just it's just not in the conversation. Yeah. You can certainly do entrepreneurship there and start companies, but in terms of these generational world changing power law companies, they just aren't coming from anywhere but The US and China.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Even China is making it difficult by, in in many investment structures. The, founders have to, like, basically put their house on the line where if the company doesn't work out, you know, the the investors can can claw back their
Speaker 1:And I mean, you can actually just go to Silicon Valley and start a company, raise money and grow and and become become an American citizen, this is a thing you can do. You just can't do that in China. Like, there's never been a Chinese company that was not founded by a Chinese national.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Just impossible. Last question for now, and then I got a question for you, John, also from FSFS. Is Technology Brothers a VC firm? Great question.
Speaker 2:We are not. We are the number one daily show in tech. John and I do invest, though I've invested in 50 plus private companies. They're they're on my website plus a number that that haven't been listed yet, and and John's done a lot. And John also is, an employee of Founders Fund, which is a small, boutique venture capital firm, based in here in The United States.
Speaker 2:So, last question. This is for you, John. What's your sleep score? You're getting heard you had a rough night, but I gotta put you I gotta put you in the spotlight. I don't have my eight sleep right now, and, and it's a it's a real tragedy.
Speaker 2:Gotta start traveling with it. Just take it on the road. But what do you got?
Speaker 1:So Thursday was fantastic. I was at 96, hundred percent quality, little low on the on the routine, but last night was rough. 90% quality for a final sleep score of 84. It's good, but it could be better. I'm trying to get to a % every single day.
Speaker 2:It's it's good. It's probably, probably better than the Doge team, which probably put up, like, three hours last night and, you know, the on the pods, but but probably still not putting up big numbers on the sleep score side.
Speaker 1:But the experience has been fantastic. I've been super enjoying it. My wife's been loving it. It's just been amazing overall, and I can't say enough good things about it.
Speaker 2:I've I've really
Speaker 1:been loving it.
Speaker 2:Awesome. Alright. Well, let's
Speaker 1:Back to the timeline.
Speaker 2:Get back into the timeline. We had a post from Will Menitis, friend of the show, underrated how much of the success of early stage companies are determined by vibes and not fundamentals. Better vibes mean people will give you cheaper capital, work harder for less money, give your product the benefit of the doubt. Once the vibes go negative, I'm not sure we actually have the full quote. Yes.
Speaker 2:I'm assuming here it says,
Speaker 1:You are done. Yeah. And then Lulu quotes it.
Speaker 2:This, this is timely because, so yesterday, Avi, from friend hosted a space because one of his competitors had a cofounder leave. And usually when a cofounder leaves early, people don't tend to jump off rocket ships. Yeah. And so, a lot of people are looking at it at that overall and saying, you know, hey. There's probably problems internally or maybe the product's not doing as well as they hoped.
Speaker 2:And so Avi, knows how to get attention. He immediately jumped on and and hosted, basically a space to kind of, I didn't I I listened for, like, two seconds, but imagine it was a little bit of, dancing on on on their grave. But, yeah, I think, Lulu's been like, this is a part of her whole strategy with her firm is, and so she's adding to this. She said, people think the purpose of comps is to release news, and it is. But primarily, it's for setting the vibes.
Speaker 2:And so, I think that's very well said. It's really difficult to do. A lot of people associate vibes with taste because you have to have good taste to be able to consistently put out ideas and visuals and product releases and know how to leverage news and and sort of make the story about yourself in some way. And so it's very difficult to do, but it does give you a massive advantage. You know, I experienced this with my last company.
Speaker 2:I would have people DM me that were incredibly talented. And, like, Dylan is a good example, who who led our our marketing and partnerships effort. He was at a bunch of great companies. He was very early at HQ Trivia, helped blow them up, then was at, Postmates. And, he reached out to me and said, hey.
Speaker 2:I wanna talk. I haven't seen vibes like this since early HQ trivia days. And then I immediately pretty much immediately, you know, gave him an offer to join. And and he's still, like, a super close friend and went on to build a crypto company called crypto the game and and sold it. And so somebody like that, it's he explicitly came because he was just like, the vibes are good.
Speaker 2:I wanna be a part of this. And so, that it's, both Lulu and Will are very correct here.
Speaker 1:Yep. And, also, I mean, the important thing here is the early stage companies. In the late stage companies, once you've established the monopoly in the business and you're kind of Lindy, the vibes can go out the window and the profits can still print.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yeah. But but, you know, we just talked about Amazon earnings. I would argue that Amazon doesn't have great vibes right now. The sellers hate Amazon.
Speaker 2:Users aren't excited about it. You know, like,
Speaker 1:consumers are 40% is what I'm saying. Like Yeah.
Speaker 2:But I'm saying I'm
Speaker 1:I I agree with you, but it just it just matters a lot less. Like, it
Speaker 2:matters less.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It matters less. It matters it matters so much in the early stage. That's what
Speaker 2:we really
Speaker 1:get right.
Speaker 2:Salesforce has terrible vibes for our corner of x, but people like to go to their conferences and, like, listen to, pop music. You know?
Speaker 1:Let's go to Grant. He says, as a rule of thumb, you should spend more time writing the prompt than it takes the LLM slash agent to do it. I think that's a really good tip, And I think, I I I got so burnt out on the here are 10 sick hack and amazing prompts and amazing tricks to get something out of mid journey or open AI or GPT three, that I I kind of got bored of all that and stopped paying attention. But with deep research, I've noticed that getting the prompt right really, really matters. But it's not just the actual instantiation of the words.
Speaker 1:It's the idea. Like, what thesis are you bringing? What question are you trying to answer? What would require the agent actually to go and do a bunch of work and pull a bunch of data and then setting it up for success there as opposed to just, oh, there if you use this word, you'll get a better result. Like, for a long time, the prompting was, like, think step by step or ignore previous instructions, and they were like these hacks.
Speaker 1:And I think we're kind of we're kind of post that era and now into an era of, okay, you actually need to think critically, bring an interesting thesis, and and the AI agent deep research or the reasoning model will help you substantiate that and support that with data.
Speaker 2:Yeah. I think I look at this and I draw a connection to when you're working with with junior, junior level employees. It's ends up paying dividends if you spend ten minutes or a thoughtfully crafted email explaining exactly what you want, how you want it done, what success looks like, and things like that. And so you're just gonna get a lot of better results out of that. And so I think what Grant is saying here is a is a good rule of thumb.
Speaker 2:I I I also think that this will continue to change as the models understand you better, and they just get faster. Right? Yeah. Totally. Because eventually, it'll be, like, nearly instant where, you know, yeah, you're gonna wanna spend a minute prompt, you know, writing the proper prompt, and then it'll be something that's, like, you know, completely instant.
Speaker 2:So Yep.
Speaker 1:I mean, Dworkash Patel was talking about this too. He was he said he was saying that, you know, we don't spend we we'll spend hours training a junior employee, but we refuse to spend fifteen minutes really working on a fantastic LLM prompt. And then he shared a prompt that was really robust all for Gemini to help revise his show transcripts, and it gives bulleted lists of what he wants, what he doesn't want. It even includes an example of before and after exactly how to transform the data, and he really set the LLM up for success. And now he has a template that he can use for every single show, drop it in there and get a perfect transcript every single time.
Speaker 1:And that's just not gonna happen if you just go in there and say, hey, clean this up because it doesn't really know what you want. And so, yeah, spend the time to to write a great prompt and you'll get great results. Let's move on. This is some drama in the hard tech world. Haas, the world the West's largest CNC machine tool provider was found in charge for using shell companies to sell machines, parts, and services to China and Russia.
Speaker 1:And Cody James says, surprised not to to not see much news covering this. And Chris Power over at Hadrian gives it the throw up emoji.
Speaker 2:Hit him with a throw up emoji. I mean, so one, I saw this news, and my first thought was, so this is why the Haas f one team is absolute trash. It all comes back to karma. Right? You know, they they were trying to be worthy American team, you know, cheer cheer for us, you know, support, you know, support American f one.
Speaker 2:And meanwhile, you're selling c n c machines out the backdoor to our, enemies, and I don't appreciate that. And so I will, you know, the next time I'm I'm watching a race when they're getting, you know, nineteenth and twentieth place and maybe not even finish at, DNF, I won't feel so bad. Maybe it's maybe it's, but, hey.
Speaker 1:You're going Cadillac. Cadillac f one team. It's it's happening.
Speaker 2:I'd like to
Speaker 1:see my team.
Speaker 2:I'd like to see Chris Power come in and, you know, LBO pass and and, you know, make make HAS great again.
Speaker 1:Yep. It'd be great to see. Yeah. We gotta dig into this. I mean, it's pretty pretty crazy to actually go and and set up all these shell companies.
Speaker 1:Usually, when this happened, it's it's kind of, like, we we were more or less bamboozled by a shell company that was set up by a a foreign adversary. We didn't do our homework. This is them proactively trying to sneak stuff
Speaker 2:out the back door. So bad.
Speaker 1:So bad.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And, you know, if if they keep doing stuff like this, I wouldn't be surprised if ten years from now, somebody makes a Hass, you know, cryptocurrency. Oh. Yeah.
Speaker 1:Rough. Who knows? I wonder how big the fine was. I wonder what the punishment will be. We'll have to dig into this more.
Speaker 1:Maybe do a full history of Hass. That would be very interesting deep dive. I mean, at one point, certainly a fantastic, hard tech company, probably lots of lessons to learn. Just gotta keep the moral compass at true north.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Let's move on. We have promoted posts from Jeff Huber over at Chroma. He's hiring a chief of staff to work directly with him. Highly recommend working with Jeff. Great guy.
Speaker 1:They make a, they're launching Chroma cloud, and they're looking for chief of staff to help them build and scale the business. You'll work directly with Jeff, the CEO. This is Chroma's first dedicated go to market hire. Your scope and responsibilities will reflect this. This is an exceptionally demanding high velocity role.
Speaker 1:He's looking for five years of experience in technical product, business operations, or strategy roles, strong and understanding of product led growth principles, data driven mindset, technical aptitude, excellent verbal and written communication, and a great taste for design. Bit of a corporate athlete role, really.
Speaker 2:Love to see it. Jeff's also a smart guy. Look at him, linking his, put it putting his link in the second post numbers. That's the kinda guy you wanna work for. You don't wanna be working for somebody that's putting hashtags and links in their in their primary post.
Speaker 2:Bad news. Not a lot of alpha there. But anyways, great opportunity and, great company.
Speaker 1:Yeah. So Chrome is a a vector database, very useful tool in terms of AI and AI applications that maybe people, don't often think of. The really cool, application that I was hearing about, was the ability to just stuff a huge transcript or huge document into Chroma and then run vector similarity with other documents. So you can imagine, like, there was a founder that was using this in a dating app. They have a huge intake form where they ask you all sorts of questions about what you're looking for, and then they can actually search over all that text for someone across the network who might be a good match instead of just trying to match you based on height and, you know, whatever other, you know, hard coded metrics you you code in.
Speaker 1:They can actually look, really understand the responses, who you are as a person, what you're interested in, your writing style, and then match you across that. And that's something that can that that can happen in a, in a in a rag, retrieval augmented generation context very easily. And so, Chrome has been on a tear. They raised a bunch of money, and Jeff's an absolute dog. So I recommend, hitting him up if you're interested.
Speaker 1:Let's go into some debate about deep seek. I love this post. Bojan asks, do people still use deep seek? And Nikita beer chimes in with some evidence. He says, yeah.
Speaker 1:My cousin, Jimbo beer in West Virginia, can really see the quality improvement over GPT. He heard about DeepSeek's performance from the town sheriff during Appalachia AI happy hour.
Speaker 2:Appalachia. Yeah.
Speaker 1:And I love it. And, Prashant there says, can confirm I host the Appalachian AI happy hour. And, of course, Nikita is trolling John.
Speaker 2:John, you normally leave me to to botch words, Appalachia.
Speaker 1:Oh, yeah. Appalachia.
Speaker 2:But, but, yeah, this is what we were saying the whole time. The chart was clearly not not fully real. You know? Yeah. I'm sure there was real.
Speaker 2:I'm sure there was people coming from TikTok, but, I don't, I haven't heard anybody outside of of Teapot using deep seek excited about it. I've Yep. I haven't seen on Instagram, haven't seen a single post about it or or any any type of content at all, really.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And and Nikkita broke it down really well. TikTok's been warming the trend. They're doing a ton of promotion for this. They're trying to get more people to install the app, but they don't really have any viral loops yet.
Speaker 1:And, it doesn't make sense that there would be a massive uptake that would be durable or sustainable when you're gonna be able to get similar results in WhatsApp and Instagram. Like, you go to the Instagram search bar and you're talking to to a pretty solid LLM in the form of LOMA.
Speaker 2:Yeah. The other
Speaker 1:And it's gonna get better.
Speaker 2:The other thing that's interesting is I don't think the average Chatt GPT user cares about reasoning or would even really know how to really put it to use. Yeah. And so for them, if you say, well, I have ChatGPT on my phone. I'm on the free plan. I get some value out of it.
Speaker 2:Oh, there's also a Chinese app that has Chinese characters as the developer name in the App Store that I can't even read. Oh, yeah. I'll just stick with Chad GPT, please. Yeah. It's it's it's not a really good sell at the moment.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And as much as we make fun of the Chat GPT app is being confusing with all the models, like, it is a more robust and better app than deep seek just in terms of functionality. Yeah. So image generation baked in and charts and all these different, PDF uploads we we we we joke about, but it really is a more full featured app just because they've been developing it for several more years. And so, the DeepSeek is kind of like a a rough clone, and there's a free version of the chat GPD app that it's gonna be hard to get people to uninstall that.
Speaker 1:And then there's also Google AI summaries, and AI is popping up in all these different places where there's already distribution. So, not super bullish on deep seek sticking around and breaking through in the way TikTok did. Yep. Especially with all the pressure. Here's an interesting post from Cody James.
Speaker 1:He says, we should bring back how it's made. This show did more for America's skilled workforce than anything else. Post clearly resonated. 1.5 k likes. And, did you watch How It's Made Ever?
Speaker 2:Trying to remember. It sounds really familiar, but it might be slightly before my time as as an almost Gen Z or
Speaker 1:It was on, I think Discovery or one of those kind of the Mythbusters network, and they would just show you, okay. We went to a factory that makes bubble gum, and we're just gonna show you the ingredients going in, goes into this machine, gets extruded, really nice cameras, really, like, lots of slow motion, just, really nice voice over and some really cool music. And it was just really relaxing, really fun to watch. I loved watching this, and it actually came in in in super handy when we were building the first, we were, planning to build the first, manufacturing line for Lucy gum, nicotine gum. I literally watched how it's made on how to make gum.
Speaker 1:And and I was like, okay. Taking notes. Like, okay. It goes in this machine. It goes in this machine.
Speaker 1:And it's remarkably like making pasta. You're like, you you have a bunch of ingredients. You knead it into a dough, then you extrude it, then you need to cool it and kinda bake it down, and then you coat it. Yeah. And so and and it's just like it's really just like four or five machines.
Speaker 1:Each machine has a couple buttons and, yeah, you can hook it up to a computer. But, really, it's just like, if you know how to turn it on, you know the right settings, you know that, oh, if you put this, you know, this flavoring in, you're gonna run it, for a little bit longer or you're gonna need something else in there. And you and this is how, like, pretty much every product in the world is made. And, Yeah. And I completely agree.
Speaker 1:There we we're getting a light version of this with the Jason Carman documentaries. I I got a chance to do a version of how it's made with George Hotz because he has brought his entire manufacturing, workflow in house for Comma AI, the aftermarket That's
Speaker 2:crazy.
Speaker 1:Self driving kit. And so he has a a machine that prints circuit boards and then a machine that puts transistors on the boards and assembles them, and then he takes it over to a new place.
Speaker 2:George to get into the drone market.
Speaker 1:For sure. That would be amazing. I yeah. I mean, these there there's so many companies that need to be built and and, unfortunately, it feels like far too few, entrepreneurs that have the will and the ability to actually go and execute at scale and and really get addicted to the grind of, okay, we're gonna sell more and more and more and grow, grow, grow. We we keep coming back to like, oh, there's a problem.
Speaker 1:Like, can Elon build a company around this? If not, we're screwed. Like, Intel, it's gotta be an Elon project or no one. And, as much as I love Elon, it's, like, it's kinda sad that we don't have, like, a deep roster of Elons that can go and transform companies. But hopefully, the next generation is it.
Speaker 1:Hopefully, they get inspired by how it's more b tier.
Speaker 2:Our listeners, build different. Ironically are.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It's true.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Awesome.
Speaker 1:Let's move on. This is fantastic news. Palantir has officially reached mega mega cap status today, surpassing a 250,000,000,000 market cap. The stock is absolutely ripping. It's It's massive, and Gary Tan quote tweets it and says, I designed the logo for a mega cap nineteen years ago.
Speaker 1:Overnight success sometimes takes two decades. That is so crazy. Insane. GT. GT.
Speaker 1:GT.
Speaker 2:I see.
Speaker 1:The absolute absolute dog. And, Ty Morris down there says time to update this thumbnail. It's, it's a vlog of Gary saying that he I believe he didn't stay at Palantir long enough to get all of his shares. And he says, it's the decision that cost him 200,000,000. Pretty sure Palantir was worth like 10,000,000,000 back then.
Speaker 1:And so you might need to add another zero to that. But, you know, Gary has obviously gone on to do incredible things And, you know
Speaker 2:Make it all back.
Speaker 1:Make it all back. Make it all back in the in the capital markets game. And, it's and it's still just, like, a fantastic story and a really inspiring story for early employees, and and a and a tale about joining a rocket ship, identifying the right company, getting in, and and just riding it all the way to the top. And so, Gary's been super, super generous sharing his insights on his YouTube channel. Now he's over at YC sharing more of those.
Speaker 1:I'm sure he feels like he hasn't told these stories enough, but I'm glad that he's, resurfacing some of these stories because they are fantastic.
Speaker 2:Insane.
Speaker 1:Oh, this is some amazing breaking news. Saudi Arabia has asked the Oscar winning composer Hans Zimmer to work on a new version of its national anthem. I am so excited about this. This is this is just incredible. It only happens in Saudi Arabia.
Speaker 1:And I love that they're just like, yeah. We need a v two. Like, no one We should be
Speaker 2:so this this we should all we should commission new versions of the national anthem. You don't actually have to be the actual country to commission a new version of your national anthem. We could do we could do a, you know I
Speaker 1:love it.
Speaker 2:We could create a DAO to make a new, you know, national anthem. Right? Let's get those crypto guys to, to put their, you know, dollars to work and create, you know, a hard asset like a like a banger version of the national anthem. But I love it.
Speaker 1:I love that.
Speaker 2:I love that Hans is is, partnering up with, the kingdom. It it's gonna I cannot wait to hear this track. We'll do a live. We'll we'll play it live
Speaker 1:on the
Speaker 2:show, react to it. Maybe, you know, we're gonna be in The Middle East later this month. Maybe we could pop over and do a little listening party.
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:But, it's great to see.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. I mean, it it it makes sense. Like like, there are plenty of national anthems that are iconic. You know, people obviously know the American national anthem, but most people also know o Canada.
Speaker 1:And, and there's a few others that stick out in people's mind. Saudi Arabia hasn't charted top hasn't topped charts in a while. Most people can't sing it from heart, and so get Hans Zimmer in there. He did inception. He did the dark knight.
Speaker 1:He did, Oppenheimer, I think. Maybe. Yeah. That was somebody else.
Speaker 2:Blackhawk Blackhawk down too.
Speaker 1:Oh, he did. There's some
Speaker 2:crazy tracks on that, soundtrack.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I I wanted to sound like inception. Really dramatic. Saudi Arabia. Welcome to Saudi Arabia, Hans Zimmer.
Speaker 2:I mean
Speaker 1:I hope they play this at the airport just on repeat.
Speaker 2:What do you think the actual cost to get an okay track from Hans where he kinda looks in the back catalog, he takes out some stuff that never quite got published.
Speaker 1:Yep. Because
Speaker 2:it'd be kinda cool to get the technology temple anthem, you know, a track that we could play while we're prepping the show in the studio.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I think it's probably 7 figs. It's probably up there, but it's doable for the right price. Hans Zimmer also, I mean, people, or John Williams has gotten a lot of criticism for kind of like remixing Gustav Holtz into star wars. And so, you know, a lot of it's just what what, you know, you're standing on the shoulder of giants.
Speaker 1:What what building blocks are you using to create the next classical banger? But Hans Zimmer is great. He he I I think he did Dunkirk and, he's done a lot of interesting stuff with, like, burying the theme of the movie within the song. And so I I'm genuinely very interested to see how he brings out the,
Speaker 2:You wanna
Speaker 1:the spirit of Saudi Arabia through
Speaker 2:In the track.
Speaker 1:I'm excited.
Speaker 2:One one thing that's interesting. So in UFC, when the the when the UFC goes to The UK
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:They fight on, like, basically, like, Eastern Standard Time.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:And so the fighters have to fight at, like, five, 6AM. So they have to stay up the entire imagine pulling an all nighter and then having to fight title fight. I think it's the most brutal thing ever. When they go to, and there's a lot of English fans, and so people have complained about that and said, hey. We have a lot of fans here.
Speaker 2:You're making the fans and the fighters stay up the entire night to watch these fights. And, when they fight in Saudi Arabia and The UAE, they fight perfectly at prime time and, locally.
Speaker 1:Saudi time. Wow.
Speaker 2:Saudi time. So so there was a a UFC card. I think it was last Saturday. Yeah. It was
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:Saturday. And, started at 9AM Pacific. It was actually kinda nice for me. I was watching Saturday.
Speaker 1:It's like f one. F one, you're always up early and if you're in California.
Speaker 2:But the Saudis absolutely mauled the the the British fans by being like, no. When you have enough leverage, they'll do it at whatever time you want.
Speaker 1:It's a bad day to be a, to be a sports fan if you're not Saudi aligned. Like, didn't they take all the golfers to this to this Saudi
Speaker 2:That was, I guess I guess, the PGA and and Trump are are in conversations now.
Speaker 1:Bringing it back? We'll see.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:Well, let's move on to a promoted post from Christie's real estate. There's a breathtaking country chateau near Brantome on set on a 34 acres of tranquil parkland and forest. This would be a great pickup for anyone in the audience who's looking for a chateau. I I really liked it because it has a lot of versatility. You can see, massive turrets, multiple stories, looks like a castle, and it has a pool.
Speaker 2:Great turrets on this one. I mean, not enough people take into account how many turrets they have when they're shopping for a home, and it's just such a amazing feature. One concern I have now even talking about this is that our friends over at Wander, Kyle and John, they listen to the show, and I'm guessing that that they're listening live, and I'm guessing that they're bidding
Speaker 1:on this
Speaker 2:thing already. And so, if you're not listening to the show live, good luck, picking this thing up because the Wander guys are on a mission to get the the best vacation rentals across the entire world in every single market. So
Speaker 1:Yeah. So let's move through to the next slide. We got some close ups of the turrets. We got the pool, and you go inside, and it's just loud opulence everywhere you look. Amazing.
Speaker 2:It looks like it could use a little
Speaker 1:bit of a With this fireplace.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Little bit of a maybe not a remodel, but a a sort of refurbishment. But But then
Speaker 1:you throw an Eight Sleep on the floor and you're good. What else do you need?
Speaker 2:Yeah. In your in your There you go. All you need is an eight sleep and a dream.
Speaker 1:In your Renaissance castle. Great place for off sites. Great place to have the whole crew while you're building the startup. Get a chateau. The country chateau.
Speaker 1:So yeah. If you're looking for a chateau, go to Christie's real estate, tell them the Technology Brothers sent you. And then, you know, while you're not there, throw it on wander. Make it a little couple extra bucks.
Speaker 2:There you go. That's that's the real play. Yeah. Alright. I threw this in.
Speaker 1:Okay.
Speaker 2:I'm tearing up right now.
Speaker 1:Okay. Break it. Oh, yeah. This is rough.
Speaker 2:So, anyways, so the news is that, every Quicksilver, Billabong, and Vulcan store in The United States will close. And Perfect. It's very sad. We had a we had Quicksilver in, Malibu that shut down. And if you're a surf apparel store and you can't stay in business on PCH in Malibu, that just says that there's so little demand for surf apparel now.
Speaker 2:And so to give some backstory, because I don't think I've talked about it on the show, I, like, grew up an avid surfer in California, went to UCSB because the surf was good to be on the surf team, and so I competed on the team. And, and I actually worked at a surf store in high school. And even then, I could tell that surf culture was fading quickly from relevancy. It used to be that, you know, young kids in Ohio wanted to wear surf apparel because, like, surfing was cool. And then skateboarding really, rug pulled surfing that became more of the sort of dominant, culture at least in apparel.
Speaker 2:And then streetwear was really the death knell for, surf the surf apparel industry because kids now wanna wear BAPE and, you know, Supreme and, you know, Nike and things like that. And so, anyways, the surf the surf apparel industry is in a rough spot. I mean, I'm sure the brands will will survive. It's just more so, athleisure is the other big trend. Right?
Speaker 2:So dads dads might have been, you know, wearing Quicksilver shorts and shirts, and now they're wearing blue lemon or, what's the other one that, I don't wear athleisure, so I can't even think of it. But,
Speaker 1:Worry.
Speaker 2:Worry. Worry. Worry is the other one. Yeah. Those those those brands, like, just really dominate that.
Speaker 2:That's I
Speaker 1:mean, there's a beautiful Hawaiian shirt right there in that image. Palmer Lucky should pick this up. It can be his next mod retro.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:He should pick up Quicksilver, Billabong, Volcom, turn them around, just, you know, start printing, make it great. Yeah. I'd love to see it.
Speaker 2:And it's this I've talked about this on the show before my my, roommate in, in in college, Pierce, incredible surfer, easily could have gone pro, but his parents forced him to get an education and go to go to high school and college. But I I swear he he has he now, is able he's in real estate. He's able to work all over the world. So he's, like, constantly surfing in different places while having a real career. And so he's getting the last laugh as a sort of surf industry collapses and a lot of the, you know, salaries that were paid to surfers historically for endorsement deals have dried up.
Speaker 2:And, so anyways, sad sad moment, but I think a lot of people saw it coming.
Speaker 1:Out. Art Club says pouring one out for my seventh grade wardrobe, and Josh Steinman says, Jinko? Let's go to Catherine Boyle. She says, it's crazy how good the Internet is right now. Best season ever.
Speaker 1:And Carter says, x is the movie theater. Couldn't agree more. Having tons of fun on the timeline. Never a dull moment. And never a lack of content for our show.
Speaker 2:Yeah. I I swear we've had consistently a new current thing every forty eight hours this year, and it's fantastic. I mean, part of that is the Trump effect.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:In 2016, I I kind of I was in college. I had was, like, working my business. I just kind of, like, tuned out a lot of that stuff. But this is exactly what happened back then where every single day, he just sort of dominates mindshare in the news cycle. And it's been interesting now having JD there and Doge and some of these, like, bigger initiatives that, and having that that you have, the AI, activity as well.
Speaker 2:It's just kind of creating this sort of vortex, this attention vortex. And, yeah, I think I think many people are saying it's just gonna keep accelerating.
Speaker 1:I completely agree. I completely agree. Let's go to Brandon Jacoby over at x. Jacoby, he's on the timeline. He says, I can't say why exactly, but I need you to like this post.
Speaker 1:And it's a banger. He got almost 5,000 jokes. Jacoby. You know, the steel man here is that, oh, he's a designer at x. He's testing the algorithm.
Speaker 1:He's testing some feature in prod. No. I I think he's just farming. He's just farming likes trying to grow his account
Speaker 2:Farming.
Speaker 1:Trying to, you know, get that, creator monetization check going, print some Elon bucks.
Speaker 2:Yeah. This is this is, this looks like insider trading on the on the creator payouts. Yeah. He's like, I'm gonna use my I'm I'm totally joking. It's funny.
Speaker 2:I asked I asked Tyler and Jacoby, if if I could record live from the x studios or or the x office in New York on on Tuesday. They've yet to get back to me. They said they, they said that it's pretty tight security wise over there. So k. Can't have they can't have newscasters just stroll in the halls recording, you know, live shows, but we'll see.
Speaker 2:Maybe we make it happen.
Speaker 1:Yep. Well, whatever he did, it worked. And if you're ever in need of a pickup and a banger, just just copy paste this, throw it in the queue. Your notifications will be popping off. And, you know, I think this is a tried and true format.
Speaker 1:Almost like, he was so real for this with a screenshot of a banger. It works every time. Let's go to link. Link says day two of my one k to 50 k challenge, and the portfolio is down 99.75 percent. And link, which started with one k, has $55.98.
Speaker 1:And so, you know, you just need you just need a, a thousand bagger now. Originally, you need a 50 bagger. Now you need a thousand bagger. You know, dust yourself off. Get back on the horse.
Speaker 1:I believe in you, Link. I wanna see what happens. I know Yeah. Whatever's going on, I don't even know this app, but I know it's dGen just from looking at the UI design. I know you're trading some sort of coins.
Speaker 2:That's, that's Phantom.
Speaker 1:Okay. Yeah. There you go.
Speaker 2:Yeah.
Speaker 1:And, and you know that this is not, that this is not that this happened very quickly.
Speaker 2:And this is his tenth account to be clear. Oh, yeah. It's down to the see he's got a bunch of bunch of wallets going. So, I mean, yeah, most people would say, oh, I'm down 99.75%. You know, it's hopeless.
Speaker 2:I should just give up now, but ninety nine percent of people actually quit right now. And so take your $55
Speaker 1:Write it back up.
Speaker 2:Hit the hit the timeline and run it run it back up to 50 k. I posted it or I hadn't actually seen this until you've shared it, but, I posted today, we need a McDonald's challenge in crypto where a bunch of contestants, they each get 25 k. They've got some amount of time to turn it into a million. And if they're successful, you know, great. If they, if they lose the money, they have to go get a job at McDonald's and just use those paychecks to pay back the 25 ks, which I imagine would, would take, unless you got a nice cushy management role, it'd probably take you a good year a year just putting the fries in the back, bro.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I like that. It's a good one. Hopefully, that pops off. Well, let's go to another promoted post from NASDAQ.
Speaker 1:Good friend of the show, good friend of ramp, run that wonderful billboard that partner with AdQuik. AdQuik talks to NASDAQ. They own that beautiful billboard in Times Square. They'll throw your brand up there. So call AdQuik if you're looking for some promotion out in the real world.
Speaker 1:It's the way to make an impact online. You go I'll
Speaker 2:say this.
Speaker 1:You throw your brand on the on the big billboard. You take a selfie with it. Elon retweets it. Next thing you know, you got 10 k likes. What you got, Jordy?
Speaker 2:I will I'll put a little, note out there. If you want to run an ad quick billboard in Times Square at any point in the next year, DM me. I'll spend thirty minutes with you on Zoom and work on the creative. I love doing out of home ads. And so a little free marketing support for you.
Speaker 1:And it's completely power law driven. Like, the difference between just a what a few words on a billboard say completely change it from being, there's a billboard there to I need to take a picture of that, put that on social media, and it goes viral. And so you really can't under underappreciate and undercount how important dialing in the copy and dialing in the messaging and the imagery and the design of that billboard. Because if your message is iconic and it resonates, it's gonna go so far, and you're gonna get incredible ROI on that out of home spend. And so highly recommend it.
Speaker 1:But the reason we're talking about this is because Nasdaq, they went to the World Economic Forum in 2025 in Davos. We've said that we're gonna make Davos great again as soon as they give us a call and let us host it. Executives discuss the economic outlook, output outlook, and cutting through complexity with media and industry leaders across BCG, Teneo, IIF, and CNBC with special guests, Simone Biles, and man united. You're only gonna get that type of lineup at at at Davos, and Nasdaq is there to host it.
Speaker 2:Low tam banger, at least at the time of screenshot, four likes, few retweets. I guess they're making it difficult to engage. Only accounts that Nasdaq follows or mentioned can reply, but
Speaker 1:I know why that is. Yeah. Coins. Coins. You know that you know that anytime they post, someone was like, I'm gonna put a pumped out fund on here.
Speaker 1:You know, if you want exposure to Nasdaq, WEF, get this token, not financial advice. Do not buy anything ever. But we love Nasdaq. We love companies on the Nasdaq, and we support the NASDAQ. So thank you to NASDAQ.
Speaker 1:Let's move on to another ramp post. This one just from a fan. They say, I would love to see ramp produce a Spotify esque wrapped report. Some ideas, your top reimbursers for the year. Simon spent x dollars on his ramp card.
Speaker 1:The engineers expensed x dollars on Postmates. I think this is a great idea, not just to go viral, but actually to understand how the money's flowing around your business. A lot of times when you close the books, what you're doing digging into below, like, different cost line items on the p and l, It's to find weird things that are happening. And a rant a wrapped type product would be a great user experience to make it actually fun to dig into the different parts of your business and understand, oh, like, what's really driving revenue growth? Where's our marketing spend going?
Speaker 1:What where where are we spending too much on travel and entertainment or, you know, office supplies? Any of that stuff could be really well surfaced through AI, through even just normal algorithms, just figuring out what's going on, showing me a couple trends, but just surface this, you know, ramp is, you know, I like to think of it as machine God in your CFO's Chrome tab. And, we need more products that make it easy to understand what's going on in your business. And that's why we love ramp here.
Speaker 2:Ramp.
Speaker 1:Ramp. On to the next. On to the next one. Ready to do that one. Should we talk about Sahil Laviniga?
Speaker 1:Lavinga? Lavinja?
Speaker 2:Let's do it.
Speaker 1:He says no longer hiring junior or even mid level software engineers, and he breaks down how many tokens are in each of his code bases. Gumroad is just 2,000,000 tokens. Flexile is 800 k. Helpers 5 hundred k. Iffy's 2 hundred k, and Shortest is a hundred k.
Speaker 1:Both Claude three point five Sonnet, no three Mini, now have context windows of 200 k tokens. Meaning, they can now write 100% of our Iffy and shortest code if prompted well. It won't be long until AI will be writing all the code for helper, fixile, and gumroad. My guess is by the end of twenty twenty six when these models get bigger and their context windows get bigger. And so his new process, step one, he sits and chats about what he needs to build, doing research with deep research as he goes.
Speaker 1:Then he has AI record everything and turn it into a spec. Then he cleans up the spec, adding any design requirements or other nuances. Then he has Devon code it up. We're big, good friends with Cognition. Love that Devon's helping out here.
Speaker 1:And then, step five is QA merge and auto deploy to prod. And so he is just having a great time with AI tools. And, it's great to see a CEO of a company that has a couple different products, couple different code bases actually break down the workflow.
Speaker 2:One cool thing here, you talked earlier about how, CEO like, Zuckerberg just says, like, this is my company. I have control. I'm just gonna do everything that I wanna do under this umbrella.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:Doctor. Sahil is doing the exact same thing with Gumroad. He's basically built out, a number of different products or business lines under Gumroad, which is, yeah, I'm I'm sure everybody's familiar at this point, but an easy way to sort of buy and sell digital products online. And so he's now building out these other products that help him build Gumroad and then making those individual products available to everybody else. So they have, some type of, like, contractor payments product.
Speaker 2:They have, a help desk product that he's talking about here. So Yeah.
Speaker 1:And I'm pretty sure he raised VC money very early. He started the company very young. He was, I think, an all star intern at Pinterest and then raised a bunch of money. And then, and then I think he was able to buy out the VCs at one point and kind of get more control over the company or something. And now he runs it kind of like a lifestyle business, but that's not meant to be a pejorative.
Speaker 1:He just has control and he's been building exactly what he wants and growing the business in very interesting ways. Yeah. Unfortunately, documenting it all, right in public. He's not quite building in public, but there's a lot of good stuff that comes out of his account.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And he he did a very high profile crowd fund, I think, in must have been 2022.
Speaker 1:That's right.
Speaker 2:Very small, very, very small shareholder in that. Oh, cool. So I was excited to see where he takes it.
Speaker 1:Well, let's move on to Trey Stevens, answering a very interesting question because Trey worked at Palantir with Alex Karp and Chase asks, Trey, what was it like working day to day with Karp? I'm so curious. And Trey says, well, one time, my buddy and I were who who, who went to Notre Dame and Georgetown respectively were with Alex Karp after a great customer meeting. And during a moment of silence, he said, great job guys. You think we should be recruiting more people like you from second tier universities?
Speaker 1:That's mostly what it was like. It's so funny. Karp just talking trash, talking trash in the boardroom, But it worked out. He got great results from his crew.
Speaker 2:Yeah. And he's still still talking smack this time from earnings calls. Yeah. We love to we love to watch.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And, Tim Ronan who was there says carpe diem with a k. And Trey says, you remember this, right? I don't think I was hallucinating, such a funny post and and just a great culture, you know, just guys, guys being guys talking trash in the office. I'm sure it makes everyone grind harder, way better than, you know, you know, my boss can't make fun of me.
Speaker 1:I couldn't possibly withstand that. No, you know, you gotta have some sharp elbows. You gotta have some fun sometimes. So we'd love to see it. Let's go to Phil Mickelson.
Speaker 1:Phil Mickelson said, I would, is this the actual Phil Mickelson? I think so. He says, I would just like to say Sesame Street is an excellent show. Iraqis deserve to have it. And although production costs were under 500 k, shooting on-site required $19,500,000 to ensure.
Speaker 2:Okay. This is from the this is referencing
Speaker 1:USAID stuff. Right?
Speaker 2:Yeah. There was a USAID, payment for $20,000,000 to produce a Sesame Street for Iraq.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:And so Phil's just backing him up. He says Sesame Street's an excellent show, and Iraq is deserved to have it. So I think, Yeah. Standing up against
Speaker 1:I talked about this on the Powerwire show, yesterday, and, and and it's a pretty hilarious story. What's weird to me is, like, why did they need to shoot Sesame Street in Iraq? Like, why not just take our Sesame Street, translate it, and then just broadcast it over the air, or just send them the files and be like, you can distribute this now. It's in your language. Instead, they had to localize it and shoot it there on-site, which is crazy to me.
Speaker 2:I like how he follows this up and says because sarcasm is just completely lost on accident. Post something sarcastic, you'll understand. But Bill, replies, I'm curious how many people will think I'm serious. And then he replies again, turns out quite a few.
Speaker 1:Yep. Wild story. But you love to see Phil Mickelson on the timeline dipping back in. Not not your typical teapot poster, but you still got it. Got some good humor.
Speaker 2:Oh, got
Speaker 1:it. Fun waiting into it. Let's go to coin telegraph. Just in pump.fun, hit with a season to sweat desist from Berwick law ordered to remove 200 plus IP infringing meme coins. And, you know, I don't know.
Speaker 1:We we could be a plaintiff in this case. Someone made a a a a pump dot fun meme coin all all about us trying to steal our idea and our branding.
Speaker 2:Well, yeah. They to be clear, they made, a coin. We had talked about LVMH being a good proxy for Yep. TV because we think a lot of people in tech are gonna be big LVMH buyers in the future.
Speaker 1:Yep.
Speaker 2:And it was said purely for entertainment, but somebody turned it into a meme coin. And then in the description on pumped up fund was saying that it was affiliated with us, which it clearly was not. But the funny the funny thing about this post is that, you can't just remove tokens from the blockchain. I guess pump fund could stop showing tokens that have IP infringement. Yeah.
Speaker 2:They could block the two
Speaker 1:layer, but not at the web three layer.
Speaker 2:Yeah. The tokens are still gonna be there, still able to be traded. Yeah. And, I yeah. It's just one of those things that companies have to
Speaker 1:I mean, the NFT marketplaces went through the same thing where there were, you know, really crazy IP infringing NFTs and some were very offensive. And there were a lot of NSFW, NFTs and a lot of spam NFTs. And so, OpenSea and the other marketplaces created, essentially views and filters on top of people's wallets to only show certain Yeah. Products. And then and then, obviously,
Speaker 2:they only hide certain corners in
Speaker 1:the store.
Speaker 2:It seems like that's something that pump fund should do in the sense that there was a TikTok token, and it had nothing to do with TikTok. It was just and you had a guy from from Trump's team or some organization funded, you know, I don't know, part of that whole that whole world.
Speaker 1:Love it.
Speaker 2:He was promoting it. So I think that there there is a real risk for consumers to, you know, think that it's somehow associated with TikTok and maybe they're buying it. But that being said, people need to do their own research and think, hey. This is a Chinese company that's under immense scrutiny right now in The US launching a crypto token even though they make billions of dollars a year? Probably not.
Speaker 1:Well, thank you to Berwick for your service, and, we're happy to support you if you need extra evidence of what's going on in the IP infringing meme token space. We will be Yeah. On the witness stand. We'll call up
Speaker 2:yeah. We'll call up, Bernard or no.
Speaker 1:Yeah. And we'll Get
Speaker 2:him in there. Together. You know?
Speaker 1:Yeah. No. I I I would be happy to stand on the take the stand next to Bernard in in defensive valuable intellectual property. Let's go back to GT, the man, the myth, the legend, the president of Y Combinator, Gary Tan. He says, that is merely the average at y c these days.
Speaker 1:Thanks to AI. He's quote tweeting Yuri who says overheard from a series c founder. We are experiencing YC level growth numbers 10% per week. Let's go. I love it.
Speaker 2:Insane. Yeah. I I posted earlier this week that YC is is just such an obvious beneficiary of AI for a few reasons. One, you can just build things faster than than ever. So that three month period that YC typically takes place in, they can just make so you know, these teams can make so much more progress.
Speaker 2:Two, teams need to hire less people because they can use AI to just be way more efficient. And then three, these companies are, so I'm gonna give you four actually. But, one is that the the potential applicant pool has exploded so much because people that didn't think of themselves as developers can now develop software. Yeah. And then the last being that, now that it's cheaper to build software, we're gonna want more of it.
Speaker 2:So I I talked to a team yesterday that's doing something in sort of retail, more consumer packaged goods, and they're building software as part of their, business because it they now can do something with one engineer that would have taken them, you know, a pretty significant team historically. So very cool to see.
Speaker 1:That's great. And Gary, if you're listening, let the technology brothers, host a live stream for demo day. We wanna review all the all the startups, pump them all.
Speaker 2:We'll Yeah. Right now right now, they work with tech crunch.
Speaker 1:Give us the press pass. Yeah.
Speaker 2:You wanna be All we need is a press pass, and we will put the companies on.
Speaker 1:Yeah. It'll be great. I think we make it very entertaining. We'll stream it on x YouTube. We'll we'll bring a lot of entertainment to y c demo day.
Speaker 1:Be great. Let's go to Zach. He says, if you're not coming close to peeing yourself at your desk, you are not obsessed with what you do.
Speaker 2:And this really resonated for me because oftentimes, we'll finish recording, and it's getting hairy. You know? It's getting close. No. I think this is just a sign that you're working on something that you're really excited about.
Speaker 2:If you're working on something that bores you
Speaker 1:Yeah.
Speaker 2:And you do, and you have you feel like you need to go to the bathroom, you'll just get up and do it. If you're working on something that's stimulating Yeah. You know, you probably let it go a little longer than you should. So Yeah.
Speaker 1:And Lucas here says, dude's so locked in, he got a catheter. Yeah. And Zach said he'd consider it. Yeah. Dude is the definition of locked in.
Speaker 2:Yeah. I I'd I'd wouldn't be surprised if some of the Doge boys got catheters in so they can just stay stay in front of the computer. You know?
Speaker 1:Grind never slot stops. The grind never slops either. Perfect for it and slip, I suppose. Let's go to Josh Diamond, friend of the show, been on many times. You know him, you love him.
Speaker 1:He says this exactly. And the bridge from the idea to results, the gap is being cool, and the solution is being cringe. And so you can't be afraid of being cringe to grind towards your results.
Speaker 2:Yeah. They're only gonna be you're only gonna be remembered by, what you accomplished. So if you need to be cringe to accomplish something, that to me says that cringe is cool. Cringe is bad.
Speaker 1:I mean, the flip like, like, the flip on this, like, cringe is like, it's such a charged word, but it's more just like putting yourself out there. Like, even just asking your first customer to go from a free trial to paid, it kind of triggers that cringe feeling of, like, oh, I'm putting myself out there. I'm asking for something. I'm asking for a favor. I'm asking for something that I might see I I might there's there's, like, downside personal ego risk.
Speaker 1:And so I think that's really the abstraction layer here of of even just telling your family, I'm gonna start a company, and I've never started a company before. That is in many ways in some circles, like, cringe. Like, why don't you go be a lawyer? Why don't you go be a doctor? And and you have to be willing to put yourself out there and take that that ego risk, and that's what cringe is.
Speaker 1:It's not necessarily actually just like when people think cringe, they think, like, posting slop threads on x. That is cringe, but that's not what we're talking about.
Speaker 2:I think you nailed it. You have to be willing to be successful, you have to take ego risk
Speaker 1:Yes.
Speaker 2:All that long for years. Right? And even a very small example is us transitioning from a recorded show to a live show. It was a bit of a hurdle. Suddenly, everything we say is is immediately, you know, public.
Speaker 2:Thankfully, we never talk about politics or social issues. Just purely about business makes it a little bit, easier. But, but, yeah, you gotta be willing to be cringe and Steinman even he's notorious for posting the same idea over and over and over. And a lot of people would say, well, it's cringe to say the same thing over and over, but he made it part of his brand. And I actually think it's cool now because he's just saying these ideas are important to me.
Speaker 2:I'm just gonna keep posting through it. So Yeah.
Speaker 1:He's gotten results. The man has gotten results. It's fantastic. We got a couple more posts in the timeline. We got five more minutes.
Speaker 1:L m over at Kleiner Perkins, one of the holy Trinity firms in the valley says product exec at startup in response to cogent tools. I told my PMs we are done with specs or PRDs prototypes only. And so you're on notice PMs. If you're not building prototypes, you're not gonna be working for this product exec at this particular startup, even though it's anonymized. But interesting.
Speaker 1:Makes sense.
Speaker 2:Yeah. I saw TJ Parker post that the entire time they were building, it was what was this company again? PillPack? Is that it? Is it one?
Speaker 2:Yeah. PillPack. Sorry. I thought I was getting confused. The entire time they were doing that, they didn't have any PMs, which is designers and engineers.
Speaker 2:And so I think that there was at, at some point over the last ten years, it was very, it was almost like controversial as to be like, we're not gonna have any product managers. And I do think now, you know, we still need people to, yeah, it'll be interesting to see how it plays out. Maybe it's designers that code and then you have, like, operations people or vice versa. But anyway The
Speaker 1:flip side of this is what do you do with your PMs who can't build prototypes, can't design, can't engineer? And my idea is you send them to the pool, and you get them making TikToks. They go viral because it's insane rage bait, and then everyone learns about your company. And they're like, wow. This company is so dysfunctional.
Speaker 1:You're playing 40 chess. Your PMs are now marketers for your company.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Your PMs just become your marketing budget. So however much you're spending on PMs, that's what you would have spent on ads. And if they date people properly, you'll get way more impressions than Yep. You know, whatever you would have gotten.
Speaker 1:So PMs, either you're in you're in Devon, you're in Cursor, you're in Wind Surf building prototypes, or you're at the pool and you're opening up TikTok. So There you go. PMs.
Speaker 2:No one be no in between.
Speaker 1:No in between. Stop writing PRDs prototypes only. And that concludes the timeline for today. We are on schedule two minutes early. This is a fantastic show.
Speaker 1:Leave us five star review on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Please leave an ad in your review. We will read it out on the show. And just thanks everyone who tuned in. Thanks for watching.
Speaker 1:Thanks for being part of this community, the brotherhood.
Speaker 2:The brotherhood. International technology brotherhood.
Speaker 1:And we will see you Monday. We have five more days of content planned next week. Lots of clips going out. Follow us on x. T b p n on x.
Speaker 1:Subscribe to the YouTube channel. Add it to your Spotify, Apple podcasts. Review us everywhere. Send it
Speaker 2:to your send it to your mother. We specifically have eliminated swearing from the show so that, you know, your mother won't be, you know, embarrassed to hear you listening to people with a potty mouth. Yeah. So
Speaker 1:I do I do have a rant about the the the the free speech thing that's going on. There's a lot of people that are saying more and more aggressive things, and then there's a question about, will there be accountability for this? What's the free speech thing? And I just think going back, I needed to coin something around this Coogan's law, but I've been calling it the the what would your mother think rule. And I think that in the age of truly free speech, you're not gonna be this is America.
Speaker 1:This isn't Europe. You're not gonna be put in prison for your speech. And also the platforms are extremely forgiving. There's very little censorship now. You might get community noted, but you can kinda say whatever you want.
Speaker 1:And so it's incumbent upon you as an individual and as an upstanding member of society to not police yourself, but just act with honor. And and the heuristic that I think serves us best is what would your mother think? What would your mother say? And so, that that applies to the language that you use, the ideas that you espouse. And just if you're being a a nasty vitriolic person and your mother wouldn't approve of that, maybe you shouldn't do that at all.
Speaker 1:Maybe you should be going golden retriever mode and trying to be friendlier. And so that's how I'll end the show.
Speaker 2:Well said.
Speaker 1:Thanks everyone for watching.
Speaker 2:Thank you. We'll see you Monday.