Humans of Martech

What’s up folks, today we’re diving into the AI talent crunch and exploring which marketing roles have the strongest staying power and which are most likely to be replaced by AI.

Summary: Shit is changing fast. Don’t wait for someone to guide you. Navigate this transition by focusing on judgment tasks while letting AI handle predictions. At risk are campaign operators, generic content creators, and report-pulling analysts. Set to thrive are resident AI implementation experts who select worthy tools, data orchestrators connecting proprietary data to AI, product/customer marketers with genuine empathy, ethics guardians preventing bias issues, and localization specialists understanding cultural nuances.

Marketing Jobs AI Will Kill (And What Skills Actually Matter Now)

AI tools have cut strange new patterns into the marketing job market. Pay attention and you'll spot which roles face extinction risk, which command premium salaries, and which hang precariously in the balance. We've watched marketing teams across dozens of companies scramble to realign their talent strategies around this new reality. Some roles vanish while entirely new job titles materialize almost weekly.

One of the good things is that AI impacts marketing jobs based on task predictability and context, not seniority or experience. A CMO who mostly approves creative and manages schedules faces more displacement risk than a junior analyst who excels at extracting bizarre but valuable insights from data chaos. You probably feel this tension already. Half your marketing tasks could disappear next quarter, but the other half suddenly requires superpowers you're frantically trying to develop before your next performance review.

This episode is meant to give you something to think about in terms of your particular role in marketing. We’ll explore roles we think are at risk of vanishing and roles that are well positioned to become even more valuable.

Shit is changing fast, no one is going to take your hand through this transition. You need to own it and take action.


Marketing Roles Most at Risk to be Replaced by AI

AI's Coming for Your Campaign Ops Job (Unless You Evolve Now)

Phil and Darrell explored which campaign operations roles will vanish first and which might actually strengthen in the algorithmic storm ahead.

Darrell struck first with brutal honesty about traditional campaign operations: "The role of configuring marketing automation tools to spec will be definitely at risk." He's talking about those roles where marketers simply implement predefined elements - predetermined images, pre-written text, established CTAs, and mapped-out lead routing. AI already handles this configuration work. Darrell has witnessed actual demos from startups building tools where marketers type requirements and - poof - the system builds it automatically. What seemed like science fiction months ago now exists in alpha versions across the industry.

Phil slightly pushed back by referencing one of Darrell's recent posts, fracturing campaign ops into distinct categories rather than treating it as one vulnerable block. "Campaign ops encompasses way more than pressing buttons in Marketo," he insisted. He sorted these functions into two buckets:

* **Highly vulnerable to AI replacement**:
  * Reporting execution
  * Campaign analysis and performance tracking
  * Paid media bid adjustments
  * Email automation and nurture flows
  * Landing page and form creation

* **Likely to survive the AI wave**:
  * Setting strategic objectives and KPIs
  * Creative decision-making requiring business understanding
  * Budget planning involving cross-functional negotiation
  * QA processes demanding human judgment
  * Development of truly innovative best practices

> "I had it in the unclear bucket because there's a box of some things under there that I feel like are still pretty likely to survive," Phil explained. "Coming up with campaign goals requires so much business understanding, strategic alignment, and political navigation."

The conversation crystallized around evolution rather than extinction. Darrell sees campaign ops professionals transforming from button-pushers to strategic partners: "What it's going to evolve into is actually looking at objectives and KPIs, changing requirements, and modifying briefs." He advocated for campaign ops to shift toward continuous "always-on programs" requiring constant optimization rather than churning out repetitive one-off campaigns - a far more AI-resistant position.

Key takeaway: To keep your campaign operations job when AI comes knocking, immediately shift your focus from tactical execution to strategic functions. Master business alignment skills, develop creative decision-making capabilities, and build continuous optimization programs. The marketers who survive will be those who stop configuring systems to spec and start reshaping campaign requirements based on deep business understanding and cross-functional collaboration.

AI Will Eat Generic Content Creation (But Experts Will Thrive)

Phil explored a pretty obvious category of marketing roles: "I think a lot of folks are really excited about Generative AI and using it to create basic posts and pages without editing any of the text." The bloodbath has already begun. Copywriters and content marketers producing unremarkable work find themselves outpaced by algorithms that can churn out mediocre content at scale, for pennies. The particularly exposed are those creating "routine content without a distinctive voice or cultural nuance," especially when working across global markets where nuance matters deeply.

Darrell pulled no punches on what's coming: "Bad content is going to become obsolete." AI tools supercharge this dynamic, flooding channels with generated material that looks competent but lacks soul. The truly valuable is content that actually connects with people. Content that makes them feel something. Content that solves real problems in ways that show genuine understanding.

What struck me as particularly insightful was Darrell's observation about subject matter experts potentially winning big in this new reality. These experts:

* Often possess deep knowledge but lack time or writing skills
* Can now leverage AI to amplify their expertise with minimal effort
* Only need to provide "the spark of an idea and a few bullet points"
* Create output that vastly outperforms generic content from disconnected marketers

> "All it takes is like the spark of an idea and a few bullet points. And you have a full post and it's gonna be way better than someone, like a marketer for example, that doesn't really care about the product or about the industry and is writing like crappy content."

This represents a fundamental power shift in content creation. The value no longer sits with those who can string sentences together but with those who bring authentic expertise, perspective, and lived experience. AI struggles with these human elements, the exact qualities that make readers stop scrolling and actually pay attention.

Key takeaway: Your content survival strategy requires becoming either irreplaceably human or strategically AI-augmented. Build genuine subject matter expertise, develop a distinctive voice that reflects your unique perspective, and learn to use AI as an amplifier rather than a replacement for any kind of original thought. The future belongs to the specialized expert who can provide the strategic direction that AI can't generate on its own.

Which Data Analyst Jobs Will Survive the AI Revolution?

Marketing data analysts who build dashboards for a living should update their resumes. Their jobs won't survive the next two years. Darrell strips away any sugar-coating when discussing the analytics professionals whose daily routine consists of taking orders and producing reports.

> "They're really just glorified, highly paid order takers. That role is completely at risk."

It’s an uncomfortable truth many analytics teams avoid discussing. Your value can't come from manually crafting dashboards anymore. AI already handles those tasks with terrifying efficiency when given proper data.

Phil validates this workplace extinction event from his own experience across multiple companies. He witnessed firsthand how reporting responsibilities have already migrated away from marketing ops, replaced by central data teams who roll out natural language interfaces that transform plain English questions into instant visualizations. The remaining human element shrinks daily.

"I've played around with ThoughtSpot's search interface with NLP that allows users to turn questions into dashboards," Phil shares. "It's really impressive, not perfect, but this whole category of 'someone coming to you asking what you need built' gets replaced by you chatting directly with your data."

Darrell's own experiments signal how close we've come to the tipping point. He regularly uses ChatGPT to iterate on visualization designs, adjusting charts from horizontal to vertical and adding dimensions through simple conversation. The experience convinced him completely.

> "I don't think we're very far away from having systems where you're actually just continually asking questions until it gets it right."

Both experts agree this transformation relies entirely on clean, structured data. Companies who neglect their data foundations face brutal disadvantages in this new landscape. The conversation shifts unexpectedly toward which companies stand to benefit most:

* Startups placing conversational bots directly atop data warehouses
* Census and similar platforms offering no-code segment building
* Data hygiene specialists like RingLead that clean and normalize information

Phil highlights how tools like Census create "a unified data layer" that makes traditional marketing automation platforms look painfully slow by comparison. This prompts Darrell to consider a broader investment thesis. "If any data hygiene companies are publicly traded, their stocks should be skyrocketing right now."

Key takeaway: The value of marketing analytics professionals is rapidly shifting from report creation to strategic data architecture and interpretation. Focus your career development on skills that AI struggles with: asking insightful questions, interpreting contextual nuance, and translating business needs into data strategies. The analysts who thrive will be those who move upstream from dashboard creation to data storytelling and strategic recommendation.

Marketing Roles With Strong AI Survival Potential

Marketing Ops Will Shift to AI Implementation Experts

Marketing operations specialists who implement AI hold the golden ticket in our algorithm-saturated industry. "There needs to be someone at a big company that isn't just IT who's responsible for being that resident AI tech implementation person for go-to-market tools," Phil explained, referencing Peep Laja's observation that ops professionals have transformed into the new AI implementation experts. Their technical knowledge allows them to automate tasks, slash time investments, and multiply productivity across entire organizations.

> "Ops roles in organizations are increasingly about finding ways to use AI to automate tasks. Speed them up dramatically. Find ways to increase productivity for a bunch of people in the company," Phil quoted from Pete's tweet.

Darrell bolstered this perspective, expanding the role beyond implementation to include critical training responsibilities. "These AI operators will handle both implementation and enablement," he asserted. His firsthand observations revealed a startling gap: when asking marketers if they've created multiple versions of copy using tools like ChatGPT or Claude, the answer consistently comes back negative. Many marketing teams simply lack the habit of integrating AI into their workflows.

The conversation unveiled a striking contrast in work styles:
* Operations specialists instinctively turn to AI tools at the start of projects
* Traditional marketers often complete tasks without AI assistance
* This behavioral divide creates a widening skills gap in marketing departments

Phil shared an anecdote about researching for their discussion using Perplexity. The AI search engine directed him to a LinkedIn article that turned out to be largely AI-generated itself. "They're just like feeding each other," Phil noted with a hint of concern. This circular relationship between AI content creation and AI content discovery showcases the complex landscape marketing ops specialists must navigate with discernment.

What makes this conversation so valuable comes down to timing: as marketing departments scramble to adapt to AI, the professionals who can both implement these tools and train others will become indispensable. You can position yourself at this crucial intersection by developing technical implementation skills alongside teaching abilities.

Key takeaway: Build your career moat by mastering both AI implementation and training. Select the right AI tools for specific marketing challenges, integrate them into existing workflows, and teach less technical or AI lagging team members how to use them effectively. This practical skill combination cannot be easily replaced and will make you the most valuable player on any marketing team confronting the AI revolution.

Data and API Services are the New Content

Phil and Darrell's recent conversation cut through the AI hype to pinpoint exactly who will thrive in marketing's next chapter. Phil referenced Scott Brinker's observation that the sweet spot in the AI revolution sits at the intersection of proprietary data and API services. These composable systems create unique competitive advantages when they connect company data with AI capabilities. A power struggle has emerged among vendors, with everyone from iPaaS providers to CDPs claiming the central role in orchestrating AI agents.

> "Everyone is legitimately working on AI agents. Marketing automation platforms, content tools, CDPs, iPaaS, everyone," Phil explained. "Rich Waldron calls it being 'AI referees' for marketing tools. You decide which AI to activate based on governance, superproofing, and protecting confidential information."

The market demands specialists who can navigate this complex territory. Marketing teams need professionals capable of making strategic AI adoption decisions across their tech stack. These referees must balance innovation against risk, understanding both the potential and the governance requirements of each AI implementation.

Darrell built on this concept with his own take. "I like that 'AI referees' term," he said, before introducing his own focus areas:

* **Data Operations** - The backend work ensuring data flows properly between systems
* **Solutions Architecture** - Strategic tool selection and integration planning
* **Integration Implementation** - Technical execution of cross-platform data flows

The conversation revealed a fascinating tension about where the most sustainable careers will develop. Darrell couldn't decide which role would prove most valuable but landed firmly on the integration side. "If I'm intentionally selecting tools to accomplish tasks and making sure data flows between them, that will be the most in-demand, sustainable job," he concluded with genuine excitement about these career paths.

As vendors rush to build AI agents into every corner of the martech stack, professionals who can critically evaluate each implementation and build coherent, governed systems will command premium salaries. The winners won't be those who blindly adopt AI but those who know exactly when, where, and how to deploy it within their unique business context.

Key takeaway: Position yourself as the strategic bridge between AI capabilities and business requirements by mastering API services, data architecture and governance principles. Start by mapping your current martech stack's data flows, identifying integration gaps, and creating clear criteria for AI adoption decisions. When vendors pitch their AI agents, evaluate them against this framework rather than treating each as an isolated implementation. Your value comes from creating a coherent system rather than a collection of disconnected AI tools.

AI Can't Replace Human Orchestrators of Marketing Data

Phil questions the vulnerability of data pipeline roles to AI's relentless advance. "ETL and reverse ETL processes are becoming increasingly automated through tools like Census," he observes, fingers hovering over the keyboard as he contemplates the shifting landscape. "Basic data cleaning and prep is dramatically easier with self-serve, no-code tools." The contradiction gnaws at him - while outsiders might label these positions as AI fodder, several powerful counterforces exist:

* Marketing tech stacks grow more byzantine daily
* Custom business logic remains stubbornly organization-specific 
* Human troubleshooters must intervene when pipelines inevitably break

The velocity of change in this space leaves Phil conflicted. "I don't need to hire a team of data engineers to do reverse ETL anymore; I could have one person doing that with Census," he admits, his voice trailing with uncertainty.

> "Data complexity continues to increase as marketing technology stacks grow more sophisticated," Phil notes, running his hand through his hair. "That's part of what makes me think there's some future-proofing built into these roles."

Darrell nods vigorously, parsing the nuances. "You won't need a team, but someone must oversee connections between reverse ETL tools like Census and various activation tools flowing into the data warehouse," he explains, leaning forward for emphasis. The connections demand human judgment - they resist the tidy algorithmic solutions AI excels at. Darrell sketches a comparison that crystallizes the distinction. Salesforce and Marketo offer app exchanges where integration feels almost magical - enter tokens and API keys, and systems handshake seamlessly. A marketing admin can handle it without breaking a sweat.

Data warehouse integration lives in a different universe entirely. Even Snowflake, pushing hard toward simplified connections, requires human intelligence to determine how systems interact and which data points matter. Someone must ask: What happens when this connects to that? Which data needs to flow where? These questions demand context, business understanding, and judgment calls that AI stumbles over.

The conversation exposes a crucial pattern in AI's impact on marketing roles. Tools transform rather than terminate positions. The once-technical realm of data orchestration now demands less coding but more strategic oversight. You need professionals who speak both business and data fluently, who understand the why behind the connections, not just the how. Their value comes from orchestrating an increasingly powerful but disparate ecosystem of tools that, without human direction, would create magnificent chaos.

Key takeaway: AI won't replace data pipeline managers; it will elevate them from coders to conductors. Hire for this evolution by finding people who understand both technical systems and business objectives. They should ask great questions about data flows, spot potential integration problems before they happen, and think holistically about your data ecosystem. Most importantly, look for professionals who can translate between technical capabilities and business outcomes - explaining to marketers what's possible with the data architecture and helping technical teams prioritize the connections that drive actual revenue.

Product Marketing and Customer Marketing Are Extremely AI-Resistant

Product marketing and customer marketing offer serious staying power in the AI revolution. Phil points to these roles as requiring something machines struggle with: genuine human connection. These positions go beyond clicking through data dashboards. They demand sitting with real customers, watching their facial expressions, and catching the subtle reactions that quantitative analysis misses.

> "Product marketing and customer marketing roles require leap of faith concepts derived from customer empathy, really knowing your customers," Phil explains.

For complex technical products, particularly those targeting developers, product marketers build positioning that resonates on a human level. This work involves:

* Conducting use case testing with actual users
* Creating detailed use case maps from firsthand observations 
* Designing positioning that cuts through noise
* Building messaging that speaks to specific pain points

Darrell agrees with Phil but adds a twist to the conversation. Rather than seeing AI as the enemy of product marketers, he views it as a powerful ally. "Product marketing is going to be turbocharged by AI," Darrell notes. He envisions marketers using AI as a multiplier, helping them rapidly test positioning across different segments. The human marketer still guides the ship, but AI helps them navigate more waters simultaneously.

The conversation shifts when Darrell introduces strategy operations as another AI-resistant discipline. This role serves as the connective tissue between high-level plans and actual execution. In many organizations, strategies mutate as they travel down the chain of command. Darrell describes a familiar corporate problem: "Leaders will come up with plans and it'll be filtered down and game of telephone changed all the way to the marketers building the campaigns." The result? Campaigns that contradict each other or miss the strategic mark completely.

Strategy operations professionals prevent this breakdown. Their value comes from maintaining strategic integrity throughout implementation. They translate executive vision into tactical reality without losing the plot. While Darrell admits his bias (his team focuses on this area), his enthusiasm stems from seeing how vital this connective role has become in modern marketing teams.

Key takeaway: Future-proof your marketing career by developing expertise in roles where AI serves as your assistant rather than your replacement. Product marketing and customer marketing require human empathy and qualitative judgment that machines enhance but cannot replicate. For maximum job security, focus on skills that blend human insight with AI acceleration: deep customer empathy, qualitative understanding, and cross-functional strategic implementation.

AI-Proof Jobs in Marketing and Community Building

Community building exists in a realm where algorithms fear to tread. Phil shares his conversation with Mac Redden about the "go to network movement," spotlighting how sales professionals who cultivate authentic relationships with prospects generate value that no algorithm can replicate. You hear the conviction in his voice when he states:

> "The whole point of community is building relationships between humans. AI comes in and helps with community management and automation, but there always needs to be a human thinking about the strategy."

While technology handles the mechanics—Slack channels, gated portals, automated responses—the architecture of meaningful connections remains stubbornly human-centric. Phil calls it "feature proof by AI" for good reason: machines excel at processing what exists but falter at imagining what could be.

Darrell vigorously agrees and expands the AI-resistant territory to include brand development. He wrote an article criticizing marketing's unhealthy fixation with revenue attribution, noting how this obsession has gutted disciplines that build long-term value. "We're getting way too connected to revenue," he observes, calling out how many organizations sacrifice community and brand initiatives on the altar of immediate ROI. The nuanced psychology of brand perception, the emotional resonance of storytelling, the cultural attunement required for effective positioning—these demand a human touch that AI simply can't deliver.

Both marketing leaders illuminate a pattern you'd be foolish to ignore: marketing functions that resist algorithmic replacement share common traits:
• They require genuine emotional intelligence
• They depend on relationship cultivation
• They demand strategic vision and creative leaps
• They involve cultural context and nuance
• They build on accumulated human experience

This reality contradicts the AI worship happening across marketing departments worldwide. Executives predict the automation of nearly everything while smart marketers quietly build careers around functions machines can't touch. The dividing line grows clearer daily: execution-focused roles face extinction, while strategy and connection-centered positions gain value precisely because they resist algorithmic replication.

Your future marketing career hinges on this distinction. Technologies come and go, but your ability to architect communities, develop brand strategy, and cultivate relationships puts you in a category computers can't compete with. The skilled community manager who understands the subtle dynamics of group psychology, who knows when to intervene and when to let conversations flow naturally, who senses the undercurrents of member satisfaction—this person holds value no neural network can match. Similarly, the brand strategist who intuitively grasps cultural shifts, who feels the rhythm of changing consumer values, who synthesizes disparate signals into coherent positioning—their job security grows stronger as AI proliferates.

Key takeaway: Community architecture, brand narrative development, and relationship cultivation is something innately human. These areas will increase in value as organizations discover that while algorithms excel at optimization, humans excel at imagination and original thought. Your competitive advantage comes from leaning into what makes you human: empathy, creativity, cultural awareness, and strategic vision. Double down on these skills daily through deliberate practice, and you'll find yourself in ever-increasing demand regardless of how powerful AI becomes.

The Cultural Complexities of Global Marketing AI Cannot Solve

Localization is a marketing function where humans maintain a distinct advantage over AI. Chatting with Nataly Kelly, former VP of Marketing at HubSpot who spent eight years overseeing international expansion, taught us that localization transcends simple translation. "It's translating concepts and ideas. Sometimes single words are totally lost in translation," Phil noted, highlighting the nuanced cultural understanding required when adapting content across markets.

Darrell brought firsthand experience to the conversation, having managed a globalization team. "AI does not get you where you need to go," he stated firmly. While AI tools might handle basic phrases or slang, they fail to recognize cultural taboos and sensitivities that can derail marketing campaigns. The human element proves irreplaceable when navigating these cultural minefields that shift constantly, outpacing AI's training data.

> "There's just the overall taboo within certain cultures that you shouldn't say."

The practical challenges extend beyond technical capabilities. Darrell observed how difficult it becomes to convince stakeholders of localization's importance, as many remain stubbornly centered on their own cultural context. Companies often face two distinct strategic paths:

* Traditional localization: Creating content centrally (usually US-based) then adapting for international markets
* Local creation: Hiring teams within target markets to develop region-specific content from scratch

This strategic fork creates uncertainty about localization's AI resistance. "I would probably bucket it in unclear," Darrell admitted, citing two evolving factors:

1. AI's improving cultural comprehension capabilities
2. The trend toward employing local talent instead of specialized localization teams

The conversation reveals a marketing function in flux, caught between human intuition and technological advancement, with companies still searching for the optimal approach to global communication that respects cultural nuance without sacrificing efficiency.

Key takeaway: Cultural marketing requires human judgment no algorithm can match. Build a hybrid approach where you empower local teams with native cultural knowledge while using AI selectively for initial translation scaffolding. Test all adaptations with local focus groups before launch. For best results, create a feedback loop where successful localized campaigns inform your global strategy, not just the reverse. You'll gain deeper market penetration while avoiding costly cultural missteps that automated systems inevitably miss.

AI Bias Creates Demand for Human Ethics Guardians

Phil and Darrell's conversation about AI's impact on marketing jobs revealed a startling truth about ethical oversight roles. Darrell initially categorized ethics and privacy positions as "unclear" in their vulnerability to AI replacement. "Ethics often lands at the bottom of executive priority lists," Darrell observed. "Companies typically address it only after facing public backlash or legal consequences."

Phil challenged this assessment with a real-world cautionary tale that exposed the glaring blind spots in AI implementation. He referenced the PGA's infamous AI-generated imagery disaster where the technology produced racially biased content that portrayed white golfers professionally while depicting a person of color in manual labor attire.

> "Most AI models feed on data sources like Wikipedia that carry predominantly white male biases from creators in their thirties," Phil explained. "Someone needs to perform that final human check before campaigns go live."

The inherent limitations of AI training data create a compelling case for human ethical oversight. Consider the structural problems with current AI systems:

* They absorb societal biases from their training data
* They lack contextual understanding of cultural sensitivities
* They cannot independently recognize potential harm to underrepresented groups
* They miss nuanced power dynamics that human reviewers catch immediately

This vulnerability opens a surprising opportunity for human roles focused on ethical AI implementation. While content creation faces automation pressure, the ethical dimension demands human judgment at every step. Marketing teams who implement formal ethical review processes gain dual advantages: avoiding reputational damage and building deeper connections with diverse audiences who feel genuinely represented.

The conversation highlighted how these positions serve as the last line of defense against AI-powered marketing blunders. Phil articulated the dual value proposition clearly. "Human ethics reviewers protect companies from PR disasters while simultaneously making customers feel genuinely included through empathetic campaign development."

Key takeaway: Every marketing department deploying AI needs a dedicated ethics guardian with authority to review all AI-generated content before publication. Assign a team member to analyze each campaign for representation gaps, potential biases, and cultural sensitivity issues. Create a simple three-question checklist: Does this content represent diverse perspectives? Could any group feel excluded or stereotyped? Would I feel comfortable explaining our creative choices directly to members of all communities portrayed? Your ethical oversight process becomes both risk management and a competitive advantage as AI-generated content becomes ubiquitous.

Why Change Management and Collaboration Will Survive When AI Eats Marketing Jobs

AI tools might handle your campaign analytics and outbound emails tomorrow, but they'll never lead your anxious team through a Martech stack migration. Change management capabilities - often overlooked and undervalued - stand as perhaps the most AI-resistant marketing function in the modern organization.

Phil highlights several human-centric skills that technology simply cannot replicate: "Change management requires human empathy, relationship building, understanding organizational psychology from one organization to another." These social capabilities create value precisely because they operate in the messy, emotional world of human interaction. Consider what happens during major marketing transitions:

* Navigating resistance from stakeholders
* Building consensus across competing departmental priorities 
* Negotiating resource allocation during tool selection
* Providing emotional reassurance during uncertainty

The value of these skills increases proportionally with organizational size and complexity. "In bigger companies especially, and even startups, change management becomes critical," Phil notes. While AI excels at data processing and content creation, it fundamentally lacks the social intelligence required for these interpersonal dynamics.

> "AI's never going to have a meeting with a counterpart in another department when you're negotiating about picking that tool or that campaign. Those are human change management things."

Darrell validates this perspective with personal experience. He recounts numerous times when documentation alone proved insufficient: "When I've done change management, there's countless times where I've held a meeting telling people what changes are coming, and all their questions were already answered in an email or wiki, but they still asked 'what about this?'"

The psychological comfort of human reassurance creates value that transcends information transfer. Darrell puts it simply: "You literally just have to be a person saying, 'Hey, it's gonna be okay. Hey, don't worry about this.'" This emotional connection forms the backbone of effective organizational change - something algorithms can augment but never fully replace.

Key takeaway: Future-proof your marketing career by developing four essential change management capabilities: emotional intelligence to sense unspoken concerns, negotiation skills to find win-win solutions across departments, consensus-building techniques that align competing interests, and storytelling abilities that help teams visualize positive outcomes. These human-centered skills grow more valuable as AI handles routine marketing tasks, making you irreplaceable during organizational transitions when people need authentic human connection most.

AI Handles Predictions, You Own the Judgment Call

Our dive into AI's marketing impact unearthed the Marketing AI Institute's provocative thesis: knowledge work boils down to prediction-making, conscious or not. Paul Roetzer's post, building on "Prediction Machines," slices through the anxiety clouding AI conversations.

Strip away the complexity, and marketing reveals itself as an endless series of predictions. Subject lines. Send times. Campaign performance. Content resonance. We're constantly betting on outcomes based on previous patterns and available signals.

But here's where humans lock in their irreplaceable value in two critical domains:

* **Direction setting**: Someone must determine what's worth predicting in the first place
* **Judgment application**: Someone must decide which actions to take based on the AI's recommendations

The hesitation around autonomous AI agents stems from this exact tension. You might trust the prediction, but do you trust the action it triggers without your contextual knowledge and company-specific understanding?

> "Knowledge work fundamentally involves making predictions, which AI can now handle effectively. But humans provide the essential framework and judgment to make those predictions useful."

This creates a working relationship where strengths complement weaknesses. AI devours data and spits out predictions at superhuman speed and scale. You bring expertise, intuition, and nuanced judgment that transforms those predictions into meaningful strategic decisions.

When analyzing AI's impact on your marketing career, break your role into discrete tasks. Some involve prediction mechanics, others require that uniquely human blend of experience, empathy, and judgment. The savviest marketers will shift their focus accordingly.

You'll spot vulnerable responsibilities through this lens. Tasks that primarily involve making predictions from clean datasets face automation pressure. Tasks that demand setting priorities, making ethical calls, or contextualizing recommendations within broader business realities remain firmly in human territory.

Key takeaway: List every marketing task you perform weekly. Mark each as either "prediction-focused" or "judgment-focused." Double down on mastering the judgment tasks while letting AI handle predictions. Build workflows where you frame the questions, AI crunches the data, and you make the final calls based on business context no algorithm can fully grasp. This partnership magnifies both your strategic value and AI's computational power.

Episode Recap

Phil and Darrell pulled apart the marketing roles AI might eat alive and the lucky ones positioned to thrive. Campaign operations sits directly in AI's crosshairs. The person configuring marketing automation tools according to specs has a position growing shakier by the day.

But campaign ops includes strategic functions AI can't touch. Setting objectives requires business understanding and political navigation. Budget allocation demands cross-functional negotiation. These human elements survive while the execution pieces face automation.

Generic content creators should worry most. AI excels at churning out mediocre, formulaic marketing copy that fills space without saying much. Meanwhile, subject matter experts gain unexpected leverage. Their expertise, previously bottlenecked by writing skills, now flows freely with AI assistance. A few bullet points from a genuine expert transforms into content that blows away generic marketing fluff.

Data analysts who primarily run reports for others ("glorified, highly paid order takers," as Darrell bluntly puts it) face similar pressure. Phil described watching ThoughtSpot's search interface turn plain English questions into visualizations - no SQL expert required. When business users can directly ask their data questions, the pure report-creator role dissolves.

The survival stories get interesting. Marketing operations specialists who implement AI tools become organizational linchpins. You need someone who understands which AI tools deserve activation and which need careful limits. These "AI referees" guard against poor governance while unlocking genuine productivity gains.

Data infrastructure specialists grow more crucial with AI adoption. Someone must ensure company data becomes properly structured for AI capabilities. Phil calls it "data plus API services" - creating systems integrating AI with proprietary company data. It's less about writing ETL scripts (tools handle that) and more about orchestrating the overall data flow.

Product marketing proves surprisingly AI-resistant. The qualitative understanding of customer problems, the strategic positioning that differentiates from competitors, the technical translation that makes complex products accessible - these skills remain stubbornly human. Community building similarly requires authentic relationship formation that AI can't replicate.

Gen AI PR disasters remind us that human ethics guardians must oversee AI outputs, especially for underrepresented groups whose perspectives often get minimized in training data. Also, localization experts who grasp cultural nuance beyond translation will stay employed too. AI struggles with cultural taboos, slang evolution, and the constant flux of social norms across different regions.

What you witness here isn't marketing's end but its evolution toward more quintessentially human skills. Phil captures it perfectly:

> "The humans of Martech will always provide the essential framework and judgment to make AI predictions useful."

Your marketing career might need redirecting, but not abandoning. The successful marketer of tomorrow guides AI systems with strategic wisdom while applying human judgment to their outputs. The button-pushers fade away while the meaning-makers thrive.


✌️ 


Intro music by Wowa via Unminus
Cover art created with Midjourney

What is Humans of Martech?

Future-proofing the humans behind the tech. Follow Phil Gamache and Darrell Alfonso on their mission to help future-proof the humans behind the tech and have successful careers in the constantly expanding universe of martech.

[00:00:00]

[00:00:00] Phil: ops roles in organizations are increasingly about finding ways to use AI to automate tasks. Speed them up dramatically. Find ways to increase productivity for a bunch of people in the company, ops folks are the new resident AI tech implementation experts and are very well placed for this future of ai.

[00:00:19] What do you think?

[00:00:20] Darrell: I love it. A hundred percent agree. Uh, AI operations, I dunno what we should call it. AI Marketing Operations. A-I-G-T-M operations. Maybe?

[00:00:28] Phil: GTM engineering.

[00:00:30] Darrell: I know. No, you know my thoughts on that one

[00:00:33] ​[00:01:00]

[00:01:00] Phil: What's up folks? Welcome to episode 1 68 of the Humans of MarTech podcast. Today, Darrell and I are chatting about AI's talent crunch marketing jobs on the brink and those set to thrive. And as episode we'll start with marketing jobs that AI could wipe out, like campaign ops, content creation and data analysis, marketing roles with strong AI survival potential like AI implementation experts, data orchestration and pipeline management.

[00:01:26] Product marketing, community building and change management, all that, and a bunch more stuff after a super quick word from two of our awesome partners.

[00:01:36] ​[00:02:00] [00:03:00]

[00:03:26] Phil: What's up everyone? And Darryl, we, uh, been itching to do a solo episode, just the two of us. Uh, since we got this thing going, we did one episode, uh, one 50 at the end of 2024, just the two of us. This is our first time without a guest. Uh, naturally you had a bunch of ideas for, for topics usually out when you're walking your dog, Stella, like, uh, hey, I got an idea for one episode.

[00:03:48] It's not, uh, too hard to come up with ideas with like all the shit that AI is changing today. So the topic we had is around Martech talent crunch. Who's a demand, who's at risk? So. [00:04:00] I wanna start off maybe with like the risk stuff. So what jobs in marketing, maybe a bit more Martech, but like marketing too.

[00:04:08] We can chat about like more generic marketing roles, what's more at risk, and then we'll chat about like what's more in demand. And maybe there's a bucket of just like, I don't know, like, uh, curious to get your take on some of these. But, um, yeah, you wanna start, uh,

[00:04:22] AI's Coming for Your Campaign Ops Job (Unless You Evolve Now)
---

[00:04:22] Phil: what's the first one that comes to mind for roles in marketing that are most at risk?

[00:04:27] Darrell: So I think the traditional campaign operations role is at risk. The one where it is these people are. And I kind of feel bad because, you know, my team is a bunch of, but I, you know, I, I'm gonna, I'm gonna come, I'm gonna swing around and, and, and say, say the bright side. But I think that the role of configuring marketing automation tools and email tools to spec right, meaning that we already know what the images should be.

[00:04:59] We already [00:05:00] know what the text should be, we already know what the call to action should be. And we already know where everything should go within the lead routing tools. I think configuring the systems to reflect that brief will be, I, I don't know if it will go away completely, but that one is definitely at risk.

[00:05:17] Primarily because AI and, and I think the things that we, we've been seeing can do the configuration for the marketer already. And you know, to be honest, there's been whispers of these tools. There's, there's already been tools that can kind of do this. Right. And I think with AI it's just gonna go crazy. I mean, I've, I've seen demos of, you know, what was once a dream where people just, where marketers just type in what they want and the marketing automation tool produce it for them.

[00:05:46] I've already seen demos of early, early stage, um, startups and, you know, add-on products that do this. Uh, so that's my first one. What is your first one?

[00:05:56] Phil: Um, yeah, I'll comment on the, the campaign ops first. [00:06:00] Uh, I, I actually had this one in like my unclear bucket and, and I, I know you've been meditating on this, like, uh, one of your recent posts was just like unpacking all of the tasks that are bundled into campaign ops. Like, I think when a lot of people think of campaign ops, like, Ooh, who's the person pressing the button in Marketo or the email tool to send out the actual email?

[00:06:20] Campaign ops is so much bigger than that. There's so many different tasks that are bundled on there, and I think your infographic like, we'll, we'll put it up on the screen for the folks on YouTube there. Like there's, there's so much involved. Um, I had it in like unclear because there's like two categories that I think are a bit more at risk and some that are.

[00:06:39] More likely to survive. So the more obvious ones, like more likely to be automated by ai. You kind of touched on them, like the, everything that's like reporting execution, campaign analysis, uh, like performance tracking, when we include like more, uh, paid stuff on the campaign front, like bid adjustments, uh, conversion rate optimization.

[00:06:59] [00:07:00] Everything in email. That's like automation, nurture, nurture flows, like using NAC and tools like that for like landing pages and forms. All of those things are getting way easier. Like there's already so much less hands-on stuff to do than there was like back in the day. I had it like unclear because there's a box of some of the things under there that I feel like.

[00:07:20] Are still pretty likely to survive. Like a lot of the automation and some of the tools that you mentioned, I've played around with them and not all of 'em kinda like hit the, the, the, the, the bullshit like stiff test or whatever. When it comes to like campaign office, one of the main rules that you had in that infographic was.

[00:07:38] Objectives and KPIs like coming up with what is gonna be the goal of this campaign. And I feel like AI can kind of help with that, but it requires like so much business understanding you need strategic alignment. Like there's a lot of battles politically about should we do this, should we not do that? I think that whole like objective goal setting thing is a strategic, like human part of the, the [00:08:00] process.

[00:08:00] There's the whole like, uh, value and, um. Like what's gonna be the main CTA that we decide for the campaign. There's a lot of creative and strategic thinking that's involved there too. Uh, another one I have in like the unclear bucket is budgeting. Like budgeting is a big part of campaign ops. There's a ton of cross-functional negotiation and strategic decisions there.

[00:08:22] So yeah, there's like a bunch of other stuff like qa, checklists, um, you know, best practices. You had that as one of the things too, like. You know, AI can help with some of the best practices, but it can only spit out stuff that is already very common when it comes to like new best practices, like insights from human experience, context judgment, like all that stuff is, is pretty good.

[00:08:45] Uh, AI replacement. But um, yeah, it's an

[00:08:47] Darrell: Well, I, no, no, I, I, I interesting that you put it in unclear. I think that, and, and I, I totally agree with the objectives, KPIs, like, uh, and the alignment. I will say that I think [00:09:00] that the specific role of campaign ops building to spec, and what I mean by building to spec, I mean. Yeah, they actually didn't participate in the brief creation and like the requirements, you know, they get a ticket and the

[00:09:14] ticket is full of everything that they need.

[00:09:17] That specific part of the role I think is gonna go away. And I think that what it's going to evolve into is more of what you're talking about where they're actually looking at the objective and KPIs and they're, they're actually changing the requirements and changing the brief and they're also like, you know.

[00:09:37] What I'm hoping marketers do more often are the concept of always on programs, like programs that are just, that are on continuously. And I think campaign ops is a great, is great to oversee and continually optimize those versus what we see most, many campaigns doing, uh, campaign ops, doing is doing like webinar after webinar, [00:10:00] event after event, and it's just like a net new idea each time.

[00:10:03] That also I think is like it. It'll never go away, but I think we're gonna see a lot less of that.

[00:10:09] Phil: Yeah. Yeah, no, that's a great point. So I think there's some elements of what you described. There are campaign ops that are, are pretty strong resistant to ai. And maybe we can say like, 'cause I actually had like basic campaign execution as one of the main things. At risk, like will you make like for paid stuff like top of funnel, like automated media buying, like mid bid adjustments, tactical implementations there, everything, marketing operations, like AB testing, execution, like all of those things.

[00:10:38] Maybe some strategic elements to that, but I think that. What you just described, like the strategic function of marketing ops, the stuff that's less like the hamster wheel, repeating new ideas, same repurposing execution there. Um, yeah, it's, it's an interesting one. It's funny that you say most of my team is, is campaign ops.

[00:10:57] Darrell: Well a lot. Yeah, a lot of my camp and that's why I wanted to say [00:11:00] my, the hopefully saving grace is that I think the roles are gonna change. I think we're a little bit for enterprise especially. I think we're a little bit further away for, from that kind of change. But I will say I do have high hopes for what the role will involve into.

[00:11:15] Phil: Yeah. Um,

[00:11:16] AI Will Eat Generic Content Creation (But Experts Will Thrive)
---

[00:11:16] Phil: the other one I had under most at risk is a bit of a layup here. I think this one's pretty obvious. Most folks will agree. I had like generic content creation bucket in there. Like I think a lot of folks are. I. Really excited about Gene AI and using gene AI to create like basic landing pages and not editing any of the text.

[00:11:36] Um, we're already seeing a ton of like, um, disruption with copywriters and content marketers who aren't very unique and are producing more generic content be replaced by AI roles. Um, I think like. Explaining it as more of like routine content creation without having a distinctive voice or even like cultural nuance.

[00:11:59] If you're [00:12:00] like a global org, that one's pretty obvious though, right?

[00:12:03] Darrell: Yeah, I, I, I think that bad content. Is going to become obsolete, like the creation of bad content's come obsolete. And what AI does is really just accelerate and amplify the, the bad content, like the crappy content, and what I think is still gonna be unique and rare. Is really good content, like good content that speaks to people.

[00:12:29] What might be interesting is, you know, the rise of subject matter experts, honestly, as content creators because they don't really have the skills or like the, the desire to spend all this time writing. I. But now, you know, and I'm sure like both you and I do this, we we're both content creators. It all, all it takes is like the spark of an idea and a few bullet points.

[00:12:52] And you, you have a full post and it's gonna be way better than someone, you know, like a, like a marketer for example, that doesn't really [00:13:00] care about the product or about the industry and is writing like crappy content. So a hundred percent I agree with the, the content creation one,

[00:13:06] Which Data Analyst Jobs Will Survive the AI Revolution
---

[00:13:06] Darrell: the other one that's at risk for me.

[00:13:09] Is the data analyst roles that are primarily pulling data. So I, you know, in the past have worked with a ton of people where they really just kind of ask you what you want. You know, Hey, what, what data do you need? What are your requirements? Again, the whole, whole like built to spec thing. Um, and I'm gonna make a report for you.

[00:13:34] And then they would bring, they would produce a report or dashboard and go like, here it is. What do you think? Do you like it? Do you not? What do you wanna change? So you're really just telling that person to do stuff for you and they're like an order taker, a glorified, highly paid order taker. Right? Um, that role I think is completely at risk.

[00:13:55] And I think that, um, when we get to the in on demand part, I'll, [00:14:00] I'll, I'll, I'll share like the, the flip the reverse part of the coin, but, um. With, with, with ai, you should be able to, given you have a good data set that's, uh, normalized and standardized, you should be able to just ask it to, you know, pull the data for you.

[00:14:16] And I think we're, we're seeing that already. What do you think?

[00:14:18] Phil: Yeah, a hundred percent agree. I had, uh, this one on my most at risk also. I called it, Hey, I wasn't sure what to call this bucket. Like in some of the companies I worked at, those roles were called analysts, and they actually sat on the data team and they worked with marketing ops and a lot of cases, a tiny marketing ops team.

[00:14:36] And so the analysts like owned the Looker, the BI tool, and they were the one just like, Hey. What, what report do you need? A new dashboard? And, and oftentimes it was us asking to put this new report on their roadmap. And so I agree, I think that is getting easier for like non-technical, non analysts to build.

[00:14:56] There's this whole like automated dashboard and performance [00:15:00] tracking idea to this. Uh, we can probably even like include some type of attribution reporting, uh, and basically like ROI stuff in this, my gut says that like. This is an easy one in a sense that it, it will maybe not fully go extent, but change big time.

[00:15:17] Like this whole idea of reporting. I think it's already massively shifting out of the marketing ops department into the data team department. Um, I think like. What you kind of called out, like the, the front end dashboard data viz part of, Hey, do you need this report and I'll create it for you is super easier already today what's changing is, um, NLP Natural Language Processing, allowing business users to interact with data, uh, have conversations with like bi chat bots, having a whole experience without having to download any data.

[00:15:51] You don't need to be a SQL expert. You can ask. Plain questions and receive plain English charts and ask the AI to like, [00:16:00] help you. Um, I, I have a client, a tiny little customer that I'm helping with. Uh, they, they're a big data company and they've invested in ThoughtSpot as, um. They're like, they have a really impressive search based interface with NLP that allows users to turn questions into a dashboard.

[00:16:17] I think they call it like spotter. And I've played around with it and it's really impressive, not perfect, like sometimes you're just like, ah, it wasn't exactly what I was looking for, but this whole thing of like someone coming to you and saying like, Hey, what do you need me to build for you today that's being replaced with you.

[00:16:32] Interacting with a chat bot that sits on top of your data warehouse or your BI tool and asking it questions and being like, what were sales in the last six months? What was traffic in the last six months? Basically like changing that whole category in a sense.

[00:16:47] Darrell: Totally. Totally. Yeah. I, I, I completely agree with that one. And, um, yeah, that natural language processing, I think I find that fascinating. And I think that, my guess is we're getting really [00:17:00] close already. You know, I, and I'm just speaking from like, just from personal experience, you know, I create diagrams on my, on LinkedIn and I have chat GPT, and I'm just using sample data, but I have chat.

[00:17:14] GPT continually iterate on the, on the, um. Visualizations. So I'll just say, uh, can you like, turn it into a horizontal chart instead? Can you add like different dimensions to it to like, so I'm, I'm, I'm talking to. Chat, GBT to do that. I don't think we're very far away from, you know, having companies like, uh, ThoughtSpot or others where you're actually just like continually just asking questions until it, until it gets it right.

[00:17:44] All of this, given you have the right data, so can't ignore that one.

[00:17:49] Phil: That, that's the beauty of this, this space being like bi dashboard tools that ideally sit on top of your warehouse. Like there's a couple of them, like I had a, a long stint earlier in my [00:18:00] career portfolio, which was a BI dashboard tool, and initially the vision was. Instead of sitting on top of the warehouse, we're gonna connect all of your sources.

[00:18:09] And so it basically just became like an API connector product that you could download data from GA and Facebook and product data, put it all in one spot, and then you could build VI visualizations on top. And there's other startups like polymer doing this. I think the future is when your BI tool sits on top of the warehouse, there's gonna be a whole new category of tools that instead of buying a BI tool like a Looker and spending millions of dollars on that.

[00:18:35] Our little startup can directly sit on top of your warehouse. And once we get to a stage where it understands the tables and like we get to a good structure, you can have a conversation with a bot about what exists in a data warehouse. Marketers don't need to know the structure, the table, the right term for this and for that.

[00:18:53] So I don't know. That's, that's exciting to me.

[00:18:56] Darrell: Yeah. Yeah. And then do you think that like it's going to be a new [00:19:00] startup that sits on top of these data, data warehouses, or is it going to be the companies like Snowflake or even the visualization companies that build this ai, they've gotta be thinking about this stuff, right?

[00:19:11] Phil: Yeah, that's a really interesting question. Like, uh, census for example, they're, they're trying to like pitch this like unified data layer idea where they sit on top of the warehouse and they have like a, a segment type of builder that. No code allows you to just have a UI and interact with what is in your data warehouse.

[00:19:31] Like marketers can quickly build segments that, you know, would take like hours to finish loading and Marketo, looking at like loading screens. But you can bring in like GPT columns and, and enrich that data so they're crossing into like what Clay is doing in, in like a separate side of things. So anyways, that, that whole area is, is really interesting.

[00:19:52] Darrell: And then do any of them do data normalization and hygiene? And, and if they don't, I feel like that's like [00:20:00] big, you know, could be a whole like prediction in itself of like, because AI is so important. And, uh, top of mind for everyone. I think we're gonna see huge increases in companies that just specialize in fixing people's data, whether it's consultancies or, you know, there's a handful of, um, what's it called?

[00:20:25] Data hygiene companies like, uh, RingLead, I, I'm forgetting now 'cause I, 'cause I'm, I'm, I haven't been doing it very often, but like, RingLead, I think, um, open Prize I think focuses on, you know, like I, I, I'm, those, those companies, like if the, if any of them are publicly traded, their stocks should be going like skyrocketing.

[00:20:45] Right? Or, I don't know, maybe I'm not seeing something.

[00:20:48] Phil: Yeah, there, there's like a lot of overlap with tools that are calling themselves, like enrichment focused versus, um, even like transforming data. Like DBT has a really interesting opportunity here. [00:21:00] Also, everyone is using DPT to transform data before it goes in the warehouse and after it gets out of the warehouse.

[00:21:08] Um, like no code ai, power data transformation. I think a lot of folks are gonna be investing in that, like even building. Workflows without reject, without like formula fields and being able to push that data and, and activate it somewhere.

[00:21:23] Darrell: Yeah,

[00:21:24] Phil: Cool. What else? Uh, what else do you got on? Um, most at risk,

[00:21:30] Darrell: I think that that's pretty much it. I'm trying to think if there's anything else that, um,

[00:21:36] Phil: I.

[00:21:37] Darrell: I prob that I probably wouldn't. Uh,

[00:21:40] Phil: Cool. We'll,

[00:21:41] Marketing Ops Will Shift to AI Implementation Experts
---

[00:21:41] Phil: we'll go to the areas with strong survival potential and, and if there's a couple that you could disagree with me there, we can, we can debate about putting it into the earlier category. Do you wanna start? Do you

[00:21:52] Darrell: Yeah, no, you start this time and then

[00:21:54] Phil: Um, so this one is an easy one, like lay up for, for most of the folks in the audience, I think they're [00:22:00] working in this area.

[00:22:01] I didn't know what to call it initially. It's probably just like a way to call it marketing operations, but I think specifically. The subtask of implementing AI tech. This one seems obvious, but you know, there needs to be someone at a big company that isn't just it. Who's responsible for being that like resident AI tech implementation person for go to market tools, specifically marketing sales, right?

[00:22:27] Like marketing ops folks who can automate tasks using AI tools. Are gonna be highly in demand. Um, when John Taylor and I, a couple years ago had an episode similar to this, um, we brought up a, a tweet that was really interesting from, uh, Pete Laya who, uh, thinks a lot about this space. He will put up the, the tweet on, on the video version of this.

[00:22:49] But he said, so ops roles in organizations are increasingly about finding ways to use AI to automate tasks. Speed them up dramatically. Find ways [00:23:00] to increase productivity for a bunch of people in the company, and he thinks ops folks are the new resident AI tech implementation experts and are very well placed for this future of ai.

[00:23:11] What do you think?

[00:23:12] Darrell: I love it. A hundred percent agree. Uh, AI operations, I dunno what we should call it. AI Marketing Operations. A-I-G-T-M operations. Maybe?

[00:23:20] Phil: GTM engineering.

[00:23:22] Darrell: I know. No, you know my thoughts on that one, ​[00:24:00] [00:25:00]

[00:25:39] I think that.

[00:25:40] These AI operators not only are gonna be responsible for the implementation, but also the training and enablement. I really think that because ops folks are more technical in nature, they're well positioned to teach other people how to do this stuff. And this is something that I'm finding like over and over [00:26:00] again of like marketers that are, you know, doing work.

[00:26:04] And I'll ask them like, have you. Done three different versions of this copy in chat, GPT or, or you know, in, in Claude or perplexity. They're like, oh, no. Or, or like, Hey, for your idea, for your call to action, or for your idea for your event, did you, did you go through 10 different versions? You know? And oftentimes the answer is no, they don't have it.

[00:26:26] I don't know if it's like a habit, you know, that, that ops people just have, but like I think that you and I are both the same. Where, where whenever we have a project, the first thing we do is start talking to chat GBT about it or, um, perplexity. Um, which one do you use all the time? All Is it Perplexity.

[00:26:43] Phil: Uh, I, I actually have both. I, I pay for, for, for chat, GBT. Uh, I have the pro license, but I also pay for anthropic code. I, I prefer some of the writing outputs, uh, a bit more on code, like when we convert the, the transcripts into like blog posts, passages, I. GBT is so [00:27:00] much more powerful. Like in terms of the whole scope of

[00:27:02] Darrell: Like the reasoning or,

[00:27:03] Phil: yeah.

[00:27:04] The reasoning is, but I use, uh, perplexity for like more search based stuff, um, like coming up with ideas. For this episode specifically, I used perplexity and it's funny, like I was gonna bring that up earlier. Like I, I posted about this last week, um, and researching like the future of marketing ops and ai, asking that to perplexity and finding me like legit sources for it.

[00:27:24] It pointed me to an article on LinkedIn. I forget this person's name is now, but I read through the article and I was like, ah, like not impressed with it. Like most of it was AI generated. And it's funny that an AI generated piece of content was one of the best sources surfaced up by an AI search engine.

[00:27:43] They're just like feeding each other, but.

[00:27:47] Data and API Services are the New Content
---

[00:27:47] Phil: This is the second one I want to call it. It's perfect transition here. Like Scott Brinker talks about this all the time. One of the areas that is really well positioned in this collaboration between marketing and AI is like a bucket of data plus [00:28:00] API services.

[00:28:01] So creating composable systems that integrate AI with your company's proprietary data. Also exposing data from your business to let AI assistance leverage them in a bunch of other workflows. And this is, this is something we're gonna talk about in a lot of upcoming episodes, but there's like this reckoning within software.

[00:28:22] Um, uh, rich Waldron and this CEO and founder of Trade Out AI talked about this in the episode that I did with him.

[00:28:29] Darrell: Hmm.

[00:28:29] Phil: we have it scheduled out like he's building iPASS, right? And he says that iPASS is the future of orchestrating AI agents. But then you have CDP tools that are saying that the CDP is the future of orchestrating AI agents.

[00:28:43] And then you have marketing automation platforms that are rolling out AI agents, and you have content like everyone is legitimately working on AI agents. Things in their Martech vendors at some point. And rich as this like marketing operations folks, um, like PEEP calls it [00:29:00] like residents, AI tech implementation experts.

[00:29:03] Rich is calling it more like AI referees for marketing tools. You're gonna be the referee deciding like. I'm not turning on the agent in that tool or that tool. I'm gonna turn it on in this tool because governance is better. There's a good like area for super proofing, like the, like hiding sensitive information, like confidential stuff that we don't want to, so we're gonna become like referees and, and implementation experts like that.

[00:29:28] That whole thing is changing really fast too.

[00:29:30] Darrell: I like that AI referees. That's a good one. I think that, so my on my list was like a role that's similar. I called it either Solutions Architect or data operations. And so I can't, maybe, maybe they're both separate roles, but when I think of data operations, I think of all the behind the scenes stuff that.

[00:29:53] Is required to make sure your data is set up and connected and formatted in the right way and ready to [00:30:00] use for AI capabilities. So like all of that is a job and whatever we, you're calling that data operations, what have you, I think that there's gonna be, that is gonna be an ind, demand in demand go-to needed role.

[00:30:15] Um, and it might be the most needed role in, in my opinion, um. That's like another one of my predictions, or solutions architect, which is like, Hey, I wanna connect these various tools that we're using and making sure the data flows between them. Um, and now does a solutions architect more of pick the tools or make sure that they work together perfectly?

[00:30:40] I don't really know. So, but I, I will say that, um, that if that is one role where like I'm intentionally selecting tools to accomplish a task. And making sure the data goes through together. That also is gonna be, I would say, the most in demand, you know, survivor role, you know, very, uh, [00:31:00] very sustainable job.

[00:31:01] Um, and I'm, I'm excited about it.

[00:31:04] Phil: I think part of that overlaps with like the API services data area. I actually had though in my like unclear, uh, bucket and I was curious to get your take on that.

[00:31:15] AI Can't Replace Human Orchestrators of Marketing Data
---

[00:31:15] Phil: This idea of like pipeline management specifically. I think that's like part of your answer there, like getting data ready and like formatting it so that you can surface it or whatever.

[00:31:25] Like there's like part of me that's unclear about it because like. ETL reverse ETL processes are becoming increasingly automated because of tools like census, like basic data cleaning and prep is so much easier, and there's like self-serve, no code tools to help you do that. I, I think that like, we'll see DBT get into the more marketing operations use cases and, but I don't know, like it, it's tricky because.

[00:31:52] It's easy for us, like non-data operations people or, or like, not data engineers to say like, oh yeah, like data pipeline management is, is [00:32:00] at risk to be automated by e AI because we're not deeply into that space. But the thoughts that I have are, data complexity continues to increase as like. You know, Martech stacks are growing more sophisticated complexity of data integrations, blah, blah, blah.

[00:32:15] So that's part of the side that makes me think, you know, there's like a bit of future proofing in there. Um, but there's like system maintenance that needs human attention when pipelines are breaking and stuff. Custom business logic remains like really tricky across like nuances and everyone's like a little bit different.

[00:32:34] I don't know. There's like this thing that makes me unsure about it because of how fast this space has changed and how easier things like, you know, collecting data, putting it into warehouse and sharing it across tools that like, I don't need to hire a team of data engineers to do reverse ETL for me anymore.

[00:32:53] I could have one person doing that with census. Like I, that's the part that like, makes it a bit unclear to me, you [00:33:00] know?

[00:33:00] Darrell: Yeah. So, yeah, so let's like unpack that a little bit. So I, I agree with you. I don't think that, you know, if you don't have like reverse ETL or these, um, what do they call it when. What do they call just normal ETLI, I dunno. Just ETL then,

[00:33:16] Phil: Yeah. ETL.

[00:33:17] Darrell: yeah, so if you don't have that, then you need a data engineer to actually write scripts and calls to pass from data from one system to another.

[00:33:28] And with the, the tools that are coming out, the platforms coming out today, yeah, you don't need that. So I, I completely agree with you. I think that for me, when you, when, when I'm, when I think about data pipeline. I do think that that's gonna be a necessary role. You know, it, it won't be a team, it'll be a necessary role because I do think someone needs to oversee the connection of, of, you know, the reverse ETL tool, like census and, and you know, connecting [00:34:00] it from all of the different activation tools or, you know, upstream data sources over to the data warehouse.

[00:34:07] I don't think it just. It's definitely not just plug and play, and it can be, it can maybe in the future become plug and play if there's some standardization. But like, so for example, this is the, this is the only way that it could go away is, you know, I think the, the listeners are familiar with, like Salesforce or Marketo.

[00:34:27] They have big app exchanges and with tools that connect to the app, uh, that are part of the app exchange. It literally plugs in. Like all you have to do is enter these tokens and these API calls and these secret keys. That doesn't require a person. You can actually have a marketer or whoever, you know, you're an an admin person, enter those keys and the tools are connected.

[00:34:50] But I don't think the data warehouses is like that. Like we're not even kind of close to that. Even like Snowflake, I think they're trying to go there. But you still need a person to [00:35:00] say like, okay, how are these gonna work together? What are the data points? You know, do I wish that they connected together like Marketo and Salesforce?

[00:35:08] You know, they just like, it's like a handshake and then boom, you're connected. I, I, I think we're still far away from that, and therefore, I think the data pipeline role is still gonna be critical, but it's not gonna be a whole team and it, it doesn't need to be an engineer.

[00:35:19] Phil: Yeah, yeah, totally agree. Uh,

[00:35:21] Product Marketing and Customer Marketing Are Extremely AI-Resistant
---

[00:35:21] Phil: the other one I had in like strong survival potential, maybe stepping a little bit out of, of marketing ops is product marketing and customer marketing. So in a lot of teams, customer marketing is like also lifecycle marketing, and sometimes they overlap a lot with, with marketing ops.

[00:35:39] I, I've worn both of those hats, but I think product marketing and customer marketing roles that require this like leap of faith concepts. Derive from customer empathy, like really knowing your customers, not just like asking them surveys and looking at like high level quantitative data. Like the qualitative people that [00:36:00] really sit down with customers.

[00:36:01] Understand the use cases like growth marketing that prioritizes experiments. Beyond what AI could potentially test. I, I like those areas of like future proofing beyond ai because like, you know, maybe at some point in the future with like a GI, it kinda replaces this, but the role of a product marketer, especially in like complicated technical, we sell to developers type products.

[00:36:27] That's hard for, for AI to replace like a marketer doing. Use case testing, building use case maps, like designing positioning that stands out, like speaks to people. That's really hard for AI to replace.

[00:36:40] Darrell: Yeah, that's a really good one. I actually didn't think of that, but now that you've mentioned it, I agree that that's a very, you know, critical role. I think it's going to be turbocharged by ai, so it's gonna be product marketing again, like, like the same way that, that we do content creation. [00:37:00] Like, I need to know, like the different ways to position this product in front of customers, in front of different segments of customers.

[00:37:08] You know, come up with a different, different message for each segment. You know, for enterprise, for small business, for like finance, for healthcare. Um, and the same with customer marketing, you know, uh, using AI to, to help accelerate that. I. The one that I had that I listed was strategy operations, which is, I, I'm working on a post about, and to me strategy operations is like the facilitation of GTM strategy from end to end.

[00:37:32] So like, you know, at a typical organization, everybody's kind of coming up with their own strategies, but they're rarely connected together and they're, they're rarely, um, done so, and like operationalized through and through. To actually the, the campaign. So in a typical org, especially at Enterprise, the leaders will come up with the plans and it'll be like filtered down and, and game of telephone changed all the way down to the [00:38:00] marketers who are like building the campaigns.

[00:38:01] And then all of a sudden you have campaigns that like literally don't even talk to each other. So I think strategy, operations of the facilitation of that. Ver not necessarily like coming up with a strategy itself, but making sure that it's implemented. So I'm, I'm bullish on that one. I'm also kind of biased because like that's kind of what my team does.

[00:38:19] But, um, anyway, that, that's, uh, that, that's, that's one that I had for sustainable.

[00:38:24] Phil: I, I love that one. Uh, that one's pretty similar to, like, it, I, I can see like a whole new. Like area focused on this. Like, I think like part of it is, is campaign ops. Like when I said like the, like what is the goal of this campaign, the kr, but you're saying like more high level company strategic stuff, like how do we align all of these different sub-teams, especially in, in bigger teams?

[00:38:48] Yeah. That's, that's a really good future proof one for sure. Um,

[00:38:52] AI-Proof Jobs in Marketing and Community Building
---

[00:38:52] Phil: the other one I had kind of out of the box here a little bit is. Community building and something that's like the, [00:39:00] the, the role, um, like we chatted with, uh, Mac Redden, um, his whole idea is building like the GTN network, like go to network movement.

[00:39:09] And he's getting like sales folks to think more about building relationships and community with prospects and people. And that's like so hard to have AI replace that. I think AI comes in and helps out with like. Community management, like having automation. When like someone asks a question, you make sure it's routed to the right person.

[00:39:28] But at the end of the day, like the whole point of community is building relationships between humans and maybe AI and robots will help with that facilitation itself. But at the end of the day. There needs to be a human thinking about the strategy and, and how we go to network and create those communities.

[00:39:47] Not always like inter overlapped with, with marketing operations, but there's always like a piece of technology involved in that. Like, do we just create like a Slack community? Are we creating a separate part of our site? People can log in. So that whole aspect, you know, [00:40:00] still ties into Martech, but yeah, I think community is, is feature proof by ai.

[00:40:04] Darrell: That's a good addition. Yeah. Yeah. Again, I, uh, I wish I thought of that one too, but no, I don't really have anything to add. The com community, I think, uh, you know, if I had to say another one is like brand probably. Um, I wrote an article one time and it was around how we're getting way too connected to revenue and the, the things that I mentioned that we, we, things have gotten lost because we're trying to attribute everything to revenue is things like community, is things like, um.

[00:40:32] Brand and um, um, product-led growth type activities, like things where like, uh, um, however, maybe AI is helping with a lot more with that, but brand and community, not so much. I.

[00:40:49] Phil: Yeah, that one's, that one's tricky.

[00:40:51] The Cultural Complexities of Global Marketing AI Cannot Solve
---

[00:40:51] Phil: the other one I had on my list is localization and. This one definitely overlaps with, with marketing ops. [00:41:00] So this idea of, um, you know, globalization is being able to speak. Culturally informed with different local areas and there's like an aspect of culture and understanding other countries and even like sub regions within those countries that is so human and it's changing constantly that, you know, like GPT models are, are based on a lot of older data.

[00:41:26] You can't trust. That it knows the new norms. Uh, like our kids are gonna grow up one day in high school and they're gonna come home with like these random terms and you know, they're just gonna like, brought up culture changes so fast, just like tech does. And I think localization, speaking to that market and not saying the wrong things, like being culturally appropriate.

[00:41:45] Um, oftentimes, I don't know, like if you've worked with like teams like that, but, um, I chat, I'm trying to think of her name, localization. Fuck, I keep spelling it wrong. [00:42:00] Okay, there we go. So I had Natalie Kelly on the show in November of last year, episode 1 47. And, um, she works at, uh, Zappy, but before she worked at Zappy, she spent, uh, what was it, eight years at HubSpot, and she was VP of marketing and one of her main focuses before that. And even as part of that role was.

[00:42:26] International ops and localization. And so when HubSpot expanded to a bunch of different countries, it wasn't as simple as just saying like, yeah, yeah, we're like, we're gonna offer it up to a bunch of like German cities and like Asia Pacific cities and countries. Like there's a whole like thought process and it's not just translation in translating.

[00:42:47] Language. It's translating concepts and ideas. Sometimes single words are totally lost in translation. So anyways, I thought that one was a really good one. That involves humans.[00:43:00]

[00:43:00] Darrell: So, okay. That's a really smart one. So I've got a few things to say about this. I actually did for almost a year, oversee the globalization team here at, at my, at my work. So, so the couple things that I will say is a hundred percent AI does not get you where you need to go. Like it can maybe do some slang or like.

[00:43:21] Cultural sayings, but there's just like the overall, like what's taboo within a certain culture that you like, you just shouldn't say, so it's so important. What I will say from overseeing this function is that it's hard to convince everyone else of its importance because a lot of people are very like their own country centric and. Um, one way that you can solve for localization, because lo localization assumes you're creating content or marketing initiatives. First in ano in a like us based, like it's a US based, kind of driven [00:44:00] campaign and then carrying it over to the other market. It, there's another way to do it, which is you hire a team in the other market and they do it from, they do their own thing.

[00:44:09] And that's what I kind of see a little bit more often. So I would actually bucket, even though globalization localization is important, I would probably bucket it in unclear, just depending on like, you know, number one, if the AI capabilities start to actually understand culture, which I think they, they kind of starting to are.

[00:44:27] And number two, you know, uh, depending on, um. Can we just solve for it by like using the local talent there? I, I don't know. I guess we'll see.

[00:44:37] Phil: Yeah.

[00:44:37] AI Bias Creates Demand for Human Ethics Guardians
---

[00:44:37] Phil: What do you think about ethics, privacy slash responsibility? Where, where would you bucket that?

[00:44:47] Darrell: I would, I would like, this is just a knee jerk response, but I would also put it in unclear because

[00:44:51] Phil: Yeah,

[00:44:52] Darrell: of the same reasons. It's so important I. But like, how often is it number one or number even number two on a, on the [00:45:00] priority list for executives? You know, it's, it's often an afterthought and often only after they get their wrist slapped or something, or they get sued, that's when it becomes a priority.

[00:45:10] Not like, it's not the first thing they think of. Um,

[00:45:13] Phil: The companies that paid attention to, like the, the shit storm, the PR shit storm that happened with the PGA couple years back when they used mid a, I don't know if it was Midjourney, but they used an an AI image generator to change. The background in the body, uh, like the clothes that some of the, the golfers were wearing and like all of the white dudes all had like the same like classic background, but the one person of color was wearing like a worker's construction outfit and it was like a, on a darker background and they just like posted it on social.

[00:45:51] It's still live on Instagram. I had a whole episode with, uh, Brittany Mueller and we were talking about this, like there's the whole area of like. Ethics, privacy and [00:46:00] responsibility with AI that I think is well positioned for the future because you need to have a human point of view of underrepresented groups when it comes to using ai.

[00:46:11] Most AI models are fed, I. From things like Wikipedia, like a lot of common sources that are predominantly biased by white males in their thirties. Like if you're interested to learn more about that, like Brittany Muer breaks it down really, really well. Um, and so yeah, I think that like this whole area of like, Hey, we're using ai, we're moving faster, we're coming up with cool content, that's great, but we need to have this like regulation piece, like this last check in the process of a human that says, okay.

[00:46:42] We're about to publish this, you know, we need to think about underrepresented groups from this one idea. Are we, you know, showcasing the POV from everyone here? Is this highly like white male biased here? Like are we including other point of views? So that angle makes me think like [00:47:00] that, that's a really interesting role.

[00:47:01] There needs to be someone on the marketing team that like, does that check before we go to market to avoid shit storms. The PGA, but also to like make your customer base feel included and like know that the marketing team behind this thought, like empathetically about this campaign.

[00:47:17] Darrell: Yeah. Very needed role. Very needed role.

[00:47:20] Um, so in the last few minutes, do you want to cover unclear? Did you have like other, I had like one unclear, uh, that I think we haven't talked about yet.

[00:47:27] Phil: Uh, yeah, I don't know if, I think we touched on all the ones that I had unclear. There was just budgeting, but I feel like budgeting kinda goes into campaign ops. The one that I wanted to get your take on was, I think we didn't touch this well, we kind of touched on it, but like,

[00:47:42] Why Change Management and Collaboration Will Survive When AI Eats Marketing Jobs
---

[00:47:42] Phil: this one is highly future-proofed in my change management and planning.

[00:47:48] I feel like that touches on like strategy ops a a little bit on, on what you talked about, but like. In bigger companies especially, and even startups like change management requires human empathy, [00:48:00] relationship building, understanding organizational psychology from one to the other. There's like collaboration and governance.

[00:48:07] You have to like negotiate with other humans. You have to find consensus, give and take project planning, scoping like. All of those things that are like behind the scenes in marketing off that don't get a lot of love, I think those become even more important because AI's never gonna have a, a, a meeting with like a counterpart in another department when you're negotiating about like picking that tool or that tool or this campaign or that campaign, like those are human change management things,

[00:48:36] Darrell: Oh yeah, that's like, I think the perfect one. Uh, you know, I don't, I don't know if you put it in unclear, but like, I may, maybe it should even be, yeah. Like, um, um, a survivor, I, there's so, there's so many examples where, um. People just need another person to talk to, to reassure them about what's happening.

[00:48:56] And there's, there's countless, you know, when I've done change management, there's [00:49:00] countless times where I've held a meeting telling people what changes are coming and all of the things that I've said, and all of their questions were already answered in an email or in like a wiki, but they just were just like, what about this?

[00:49:14] So you literally just have to be a person. Saying like, Hey, it's gonna be okay. Hey, don't worry about this. So a hundred percent change management. I think that that one's staying. I didn't have any other ones in unclear. I think we covered all of them. Um, but, uh, that's, that's a, that's a, a smart choice is change management for Yeah.

[00:49:31] A hundred percent survivor.

[00:49:33] Phil: Cool. This was, uh, super fun.

[00:49:35] Closing
---

[00:49:35] Phil: Yeah, so I'll, I'll close out with these thoughts. Uh, so in, in my research for this episode, I actually discovered a, um, the Marketing AI Institute. Um, not sure why I hadn't heard of them before, but their founder, Paul, uh, Rader, not sure how to pronounce that, but he has a brilliant post about the feature of work, uh, on LinkedIn.

[00:49:51] That was an inspiration from the book. Predictions, uh, prediction machines. Essentially he's talking about knowledge work and how it fundamentally involves [00:50:00] making predictions. Even though as humans, we don't think we're making predictions, but we're making a lot of guesses sometimes. In, in our work jobs are essentially bundles of tasks, many of which involve, uh, predicting outcomes based on data that we have right now, like medicine, law, marketing, um, primarily make predictions all the time, like in marketing.

[00:50:19] Stuff that even we think is complex, like e even back in the day, this is changing already, but like we're sending out a series of drip emails for marketing. We're predicting what the best subject line is, the best send time based on previous data. Like we're still making those predictions. Um, but Paul is essentially saying, and kind of like coins are our discussion here, uh, that humans remain essential in these like prediction centric roles for two critical reasons.

[00:50:45] One. We will always need to direct AI on what to predict. Uh, that's like where AI agents are making this a little bit fussy, but we still need to decide what it is, what's the thing that we're trying to predict, like setting the [00:51:00] goal and the task itself. But two, we also need to use judgment to decide what actions to take.

[00:51:07] Based on the predictions and the recommendations that we get, and oftentimes that's where like the fear comes with letting AI agents loose and go off autonomously and do a bunch of stuff for you. Like do you trust that their recommendation is always the right thing to do? So. This is really interesting 'cause it creates like this new paradigm where AI excels at generating predictions from data.

[00:51:30] But human expertise and intuition is always, or at least in the short term, gonna remain vital for guiding AI and LLMs and AI agents in converting its outputs into effective decisions and actions. Based on your company, based on the nuance, based on the context that you know of that company, instead of just applying it blankly.

[00:51:52] When evaluating AI's impact on jobs, which is what we've kind of done this whole episode, the key is to break down [00:52:00] roles into tasks, understand all the different subtasks that come into that, and identify which of them are prediction based, and recognize that AI can absolutely handle some of these predictions.

[00:52:12] The humans of Martech are always gonna provide this essential framework and judgment to make those predictions useful. We'll catch you guys next time.