TrueLife

Will we ever move past the simplistic, dehumanising, polarity known as good & evil

Show Notes

Support the show:

https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US

One on One Video Call W/George

https://tidycal.com/georgepmonty/60-minute-meeting





https://linktr.ee/TrueLifepodcast

One on One Video call W/George
https://tidycal.com/georgepmonty/60-minute-meeting

Support the show:
https://www.paypal.me/Truelifepodcast?locale.x=en_US




🚨🚨Curious about the future of psychedelics? Imagine if Alan Watts started a secret society with Ram Dass and Hunter S. Thompson… now open the door.
Use Promocode TRUELIFE for Get 25% off monthly or 30% off the annual plan For the first year
https://www.district216.com/


Legal Disclaimer / Release of Liability for Podcast:
This  content  is for educational and informational purposes only. Nothing in this transmission constitutes legal, financial, or professional advice. I am not your lawyer, financial advisor, or telling you what to do.

This podcast documents historical events, analyzes publicly available information, and explores hypothetical scenarios. Any actions discussed are presented as educational examples of how systems work—not as instructions or recommendations.

You are solely responsible for your own decisions and actions. Any application of information presented here is at your own risk. I assume no liability for consequences of actions you choose to take.

By continuing to listen, you acknowledge that this content is educational commentary, that you’re responsible for researching applicable laws in your jurisdiction, and that you’ll consult appropriate professionals before taking any action that could affect your legal, financial, or personal situation.


Creators and Guests

Host
George Monty
GEORGE MONTY George Monty is a podcaster, interviewer, cultural provocateur, and professional trespasser into forbidden questions. He is the creator and host of TrueLife, an ongoing experiment in conversation conducted somewhere between a philosophical laboratory, a psychedelic séance, and the moment at 3:17 in the morning when you suddenly realize the universe has been fucking with you. The premise is beautifully inconvenient: What if reality is stranger than the story we’ve been given about it? Monty has spent years following that question into the wilderness. Not the wilderness of mountains and rivers, but the stranger wilderness behind the eyes: consciousness, psychedelics, artificial intelligence, mysticism, neuroscience, trauma, addiction, technology, language, mythology, power, culture, death, transformation, and the great unresolved mystery of what the hell a human being actually is. His guests come from wildly different worlds: scientists and mystics, philosophers and psychonauts, artists and technologists, researchers and rebels, therapists and troublemakers, people who have spent decades studying reality and people who have simply stared at it long enough to realize something is wrong with the instruction manual. Monty does not interview people to collect answers. He interviews them to find the questions hiding underneath the answers. That is the rabbit hole. He is interested in the moment certainty begins to fracture. The instant a scientist discovers something their textbook did not prepare them for. The moment a mystic realizes language has become too small. The moment a psychedelic experience rearranges the furniture of the self. The moment artificial intelligence forces us to reconsider what intelligence was in the first place. He is suspicious of finished maps. Suspicious of institutions that confuse authority with truth. Suspicious of anyone who claims to have the universe completely figured out. Especially himself. Monty’s intellectual lineage runs through the beautiful troublemakers: Alan Watts, Terence McKenna, William Blake, Carl Jung, Philip K. Dick, Marshall McLuhan, Rumi, the Upanishads, Joseph Campbell, and the long subterranean tradition of people who looked at consensus reality, raised one eyebrow, and asked: “Is that all you’ve got?” But George Monty is not an academic, guru, therapist, prophet, or self-appointed master of consciousness. He is something considerably more useful: a curious bastard with a microphone. A lifelong student of the strange. A collector of impossible questions. A cartographer of the territory that begins where certainty ends. TrueLife is his laboratory, but the laboratory has no walls. Every conversation becomes another experiment. Every guest another doorway. Every strange idea another match struck in the dark. Sometimes the result is philosophy. Sometimes it is comedy. Sometimes it is terror. Sometimes it is revelation. And sometimes, if you’re lucky, the whole fucking architecture starts to wobble. Because beneath all the conversations, all the books, all the theories, all the psychedelics, all the technology, all the arguments about consciousness and civilization and the future, Monty keeps returning to one primitive human impulse: to look at the mystery without immediately trying to kill it with an explanation. That may be the real rebellion. Not believing everything. Not rejecting everything. But remaining curious enough to walk through the door. TrueLife is the experiment. Conversation is the psychedelic. Curiosity is the contraband. Reality is the rabbit hole. And George Monty is still climbing down.

What is TrueLife?

TRUE LIFE is a long-form descent into the questions that become impossible to ignore once the surface of reality starts to crack.

Hosted by George Monty, TrueLife explores consciousness, psychedelics, neuroscience, artificial intelligence, language, technology, power, culture, philosophy, spirituality, trauma, addiction, human transformation, and the strange future of being human.

For more than six years, George Monty has built TrueLife as an independent media platform, bringing hundreds of long-form conversations to a growing global audience. The podcast has produced 850+ episodes, reached 22M+ YouTube views, built an audience of 40K+ subscribers and followers, and accumulated 160K+ podcast downloads. TrueLife has also been recognized by Listen Notes among the top 5% of podcasts globally.

These are not simply interviews. They are encounters with people who have gone far enough into a subject to discover that the subject changes them. Scientists meet mystics. Artists meet technologists. Researchers meet rebels. The personal collides with the planetary.

The central question: What happens when we stop treating reality as fixed?

Across hundreds of conversations, TrueLife follows recurring territories — consciousness → perception → language → technology → power → transformation → the future of humanity.

For seekers, rebels, researchers, creators, entrepreneurs, and anyone who suspects the official story is incomplete.

Speaker 0 (0s): Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the true life podcast. Wherever you are, wherever you find yourself. I challenge you to look around and find the beauty that is surrounding you. It's there. I promise you if you just open your eyes, open your mind and take a look at the beauty that surrounds you. You'll find it hard not to smile. I promise you what a crazy world we live in. I've been thinking a lot about the shadow, about my shadow, about the shadow of our culture, the shadow of the law, the dark side of our conscious being.

It's not so much the opposite of the light as it is the poles. Apart from one another. It's the recognition of polarity, the recognition of the polarity of life. Not so much the conflict between good and evil. I believe those two things can be harmonized. I think this is kind of what Nietzsche tries to get into when he talks about beyond good and evil.

How can we ever truly get beyond conflict? If we choose to see the world in good and evil, the only way to move forward in this world or to even evolve as a species is to understand there is no absolute good. There is no absolute evil and the evil that you recognize and someone else resides in your heart as does the good that resides in you.

It also resides in the heart of those. You deem evil. I've been talking a lot lately about how we can learn by experience, how we can learn a lot about ourselves by quiet contemplation and watching the environment around us. The spider and the wasp are natural predators. They naturally fight each other.

However you wouldn't call one of them evil and one of them good. It's just that there's conflict. They're naturally going to fight and kill one another. Neither one is good. Neither one is evil. They're natural. We, we tend to see or label. That's a better word. It's it comes back to linguistics. These ideas of labels and these basic or unjustified unthought about concepts like evil.

It's easy. It's easy to claim someone as that's the first step to dehumanizing them. However, to the degree that you condemn the other and find evil in them, you are to that same degree, unconscious of that same thing in yourself, or at least of the potentiality of it, just because there are people who are unconscious of their own dark sides.

And they project that darkness outward and into the enemy, you know, maybe it takes the form of Jews or communists or capitalists or greed, whatever form it takes. Those that project, that darkness say there, there is the darkness. See, it's not in me. And because it is not in me, I am justified in annihilating. This enemy, be it with bricks or Adam bombs or gas chambers, or financial sanctions.

You see it's, it's this dehumanizing, this inability to admit that the evil resides in you, but to the degree, which a person becomes conscious that the evil is as much in them. As in the other, to this same degree, the person is not likely to project it onto some scapegoat or on to a third-party and commit the horrendous criminal acts of violence on people.

It can be so tricky to sit down and think about this. We're taught from such an early age, via religion and small mindedness that when push comes to shove, we can label someone evil and then we can attack them. Does anybody think Vladimir Putin is evil. He's no more evil than Joe Biden then is Saddam Hussein. Then his mouse, a tongue or presidency, none, no one is evil.

It's it may not be right. And I'm not singing praise of any one of these people with a label. Them evil is too easy. And to label them evil is to project the spotlight of our own anger and our own evil tendencies on to them, right? In order to admit, to accept and to understand the evil in ourselves, we have to be able to do it without being an enemy to it.

So how do you, how do you know, how can you do that? It's like you have to make friends with the monster. Does that kinda make sense? How, if you, if you want the feeling of the unity in the absence of conflict in your life, in your inner dialogue, in your relationships, if you want it integrate your own shadow, then you must not be ashamed of the things you've done.

And that is something that is incredibly difficult to do because all of us have done things we're ashamed of. We're guilty of, we feel we're not worthy of being loved. If we look back on our lives and we see these things that we've never forgiven ourselves for, it's sad to me. So many of us to think I heard that depression is being trapped in the past and anxiety is being trapped in the future.

But these are both ways of separating oneself from the true path from true integration. You know, think about it like this, the, the behind the facade of even the most together person is a re construction of a, a bum or a, you know, someone behind, even the best facade behind the facade of Elon Musk.

The genius, there is a father who constantly divorces women and has tons of kid in is probably not that good of a dad. I'm not, I'm just using that as a metaphor. He might be an awesome dad. I don't know, behind the togetherness facade of George Monty is someone who does it feel as if they're worthy of living a life filled with love behind the facade of all of us, there is an integration problem.

Maybe that's why we're here. Maybe that's why we're on this planet is to integrate that. I heard a beautiful metaphor that says that the same way that manure is contributive to the perfume of the rose. So is your prior failings contributive to the final outcome of who you're going to be, all those things that you've done in the past, all the anxiety and the guilt and the wrongdoing, those things, you're not proud of those words.

You said, those acts you did. They serve as fertilizer as manure to bring about the perfume of the rows that you will become. And reading a lot of Carl Young lately. And I want to share with you one particular speech that he wrote when he was speaking to a very religious group, one time, I'm going to kind of jump in the middle of it and end in the middle of it.

But I think it's really beautiful. We cannot change anything unless we accept it. Condemnation does not liberate it oppresses. I am the oppressor of whom I condemn, not as friend and fellow sufferer. If you truly wish to help, you must be willing to accept the other as he truly is. And this can only be done when one has truly seen and accepted himself for who he truly is.

All of this seems so simple, but it is always the most difficult. It requires the greatest act to be simple. That which appears to be simple as quite often, the most difficult thing to do. And so acceptance of oneself is the essence of the moral problem and the acid test of one's whole life that I feed the beggar forgiven insult.

I love my enemy in the name of Christ. All of these are undoubtably, great virtues. What I do when, to the least of my brethren, this I do when to Christ. But what if, what if I should discover that the least among them, the least among them, all the poorest of the beggars, the most imprudent of all offenders, the most impotent of all offenders, yea, the very fiend himself that these are within me and that I, myself stand in need of the arms of my own kindness that I, myself and the enemy that must be loved.

What then, then as a rule, the whole truth of Christianity is reversed. There is then no more talk of love of long suffering. We say to the brother within us, Rocca, we condemn and rage against ourselves. We hide him from the world we deny ever having met this least among the lonely in ourselves and had it been God himself who drew near to us in this despicable form, we should have denied him a thousand times before a single cock had crowed.

It's pretty powerful, right? And it makes you come to the conclusion that this understanding of the world as good and evil, this simplistic idea that these are good. These are evil. This inability to think for a moment that instead of opposites, they are extremes of the same, like a magnet has the poles apart, but it's still one magnet. The energy is going in the opposite direction.

And unless we can understand this, unless we can begin to see beyond good and evil, trying to heal this insanity from which our culture of thinking that a human being can become happy, healthy, and whole, by being divided against himself, an inner conflict paralleling the conception of a cosmic conflict between an absolute good and an absolute evil, which cannot be ever reduced to any underlying unity.

You see it as our rage against the evil that occurs in this world. It is our rage and sometimes it oversteps itself. And if we require as a justification for our rage, a fundamentalist and metaphysical division between good and evil, then we will forever have an insane and schizophrenia universe of which no sense will ever be made beyond good and evil ladies and gentlemen,

Speaker 1 (13m 41s): It's Thursday.

.