Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Seth Holehouse is a TV personality, YouTuber, podcaster, and patriot who became a household name in 2020 after his video exposing election fraud was tweeted, shared, uploaded, and pinned by President Donald Trump — reaching hundreds of millions worldwide.
Titled The Plot to Steal America, the video was created with a mission to warn Americans about the communist threat to our nation—a mission that’s been at the forefront of Seth’s life for nearly two decades.
After 10 years behind the scenes at The Epoch Times, launching his own show was the logical next step. Since its debut, Seth’s show “Man in America” has garnered 1M+ viewers on a monthly basis as his commitment to bring hope to patriots and to fight communism and socialism grows daily. His guests have included Peter Navarro, Kash Patel, Senator Wendy Rogers, General Michael Flynn, and General Robert Spalding.
He is also a regular speaker at the “ReAwaken America Tour” alongside Eric Trump, Mike Lindell, Gen. Flynn.
Welcome to Man in America. I'm your host, Seth Holehouse. So as tensions escalate in Ukraine, Xi Jinping is showing strong support for Putin. Yet just yesterday, George Soros harshly criticized Xi Jinping, actually comparing the upcoming Olympic Games to Nazi Germany. And Biden?
Speaker 1:Well, he seems confused in the middle of all this. So is there a bigger plan at play here, or are the elites scrambling for control as the COVID narrative collapses? We're gonna dig into all this and more on today's show, where I'll be joined by Jeff Nyquist. Jeff has authored multiple books and is an expert on communism and geopolitics, two areas that are critical for us to understand right now. But before we get started, I have a few short messages for you.
Speaker 1:First off, if you wanna follow me on social media, please head over to Telegram, type in man in America, you're gonna find me. Also, below in the description of the video, you can find the links to all of my social media links. You can also find my podcast. So every time I finish the show, immediately afterwards, I upload the show to my podcast channels, so you can listen while driving or working, etcetera. So again, make sure you head over to Telegram though.
Speaker 1:Find me at man in America, because with all the big tech censorship in case I get canceled, pulled off at YouTube, Facebook, you never know, you can still stay in touch with me. And finally, before we start, look, with inflation and a lot of instability in the markets, folks are looking for ways to protect their wealth. And I've always been one to recommend physical gold and silver. In the past year, a lot of you had asked me said, Seth, do you have any recommendations as to where I can buy gold or silver? And to be honest, I was pretty hesitant to recommend anybody because unfortunately, there's a lot of shady dealers.
Speaker 1:I used to work in the industry. Trust me. However, after doing a lot of research, I'm confident in recommending Noble Gold. I read through pages and pages of reviews, and look, I also called them as a customer to see how they'd handle the sale process and if they're, you know, using shady, you know, high pressure sales tactics, anything, and they didn't. They were actually quite fair with their pricing, and it was an overall good experience.
Speaker 1:And look, you're not gonna get a good deal on gold. It's a commodity. If you get a really good deal, it's probably fake or maybe even stolen. What you wanna look for is a fair transaction with someone you can trust. In addition, Noble Gold also specializes in IRA transfers, which allows you to transfer your IRA into physical gold and silver with zero taxes or penalties.
Speaker 1:If you wanna learn more about this, open up a new tab right now and go to goldwithseth.com. Again, www.goldwithseth.com. And look, as I mentioned, I used to work in the precious metals industry. So if you have any questions, I'm happy to try to help out. I'm not a financial expert, but I've played that game before.
Speaker 1:So you can email me directly at gold@maninamerica.com. I'll personally respond. I'll give you my best advice. So alright, on to today's show. Again, my guest, I'm so honored to have him on here, is Jeff Nyquist, who is the perfect person to talk to with everything happening around the world right now.
Speaker 1:So let's go ahead and welcome Jeff Nyquist.
Speaker 2:Hi, Seth.
Speaker 1:Hey, Jeff. Welcome. How are you doing?
Speaker 2:I'm doing okay. The world's not, but, I'm okay for now.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I know you're up in Michigan. I'm in Ohio, and we're buried in about a foot of snow. So I can only imagine what life is like up there.
Speaker 2:Colder, more snow.
Speaker 1:Oh, good. So, Jeff, I've been trying to follow and understand what's happening. And that's not been easy. Can you just give us an overview of, like, what are we seeing play out right now with Ukraine and Russia and now Xi Jinping backing Putin and Biden and NATO? How can we make sense of what's happening over there?
Speaker 2:Well, a brief synopsis. At the October, the US government revealed, and I think it was the Washington Post that first covered it, that, Russia was preparing for a major mobilization, that this mobilization would very possibly lead to a war, in Ukraine, that there was some kind of plan to invade Ukraine, take some part of it, But it was a big mobilization. This was picked up in Ukraine. Ukrainian, press started discussing it in early November. You'll find Ukrainian articles.
Speaker 2:Sure enough, the mobilization started. The Russians started deploying forces. You see all these headlines, a hundred thousand troops put on the you know? Of course, that's a hundred thousand troops is nothing. You can't invade Ukraine with a hundred thousand.
Speaker 2:Ukrainian standing army is 165. And with their militia that they've mobilized, you know, they got 250,000, maybe close to 300,000 now. But they haven't mobilized their 400,000 reservists. But the Russian mobilization, which kind of began, started in November through December, now through January, now continuing in February, it isn't over yet. They're still, it just got word, what was it, this morning that a helicopter, new helicopter units, Soviet helicopter forces have been moved closer to the border.
Speaker 2:Right? You've got, I just, this morning, more trains, dozens of trains filled with military equipment and troops moving into Belarus, Russia, which is north of Ukraine. The deployment gets stronger and stronger. It is like The US intelligence said, they called it, it's true. This deployment is unlike anything we have seen before.
Speaker 2:And of course, NATO's nervous. The US is nervous. The president of Ukraine, Zelensky, has told Biden to calm down. It's not a big deal. There's not gonna be an invasion.
Speaker 2:And Ukraine, except for mobilizing these militias, which are not really serious formations in a war with Russian troops, Ukraine is not really mobilizing its reserves. Meanwhile, we're not talking about we've, it has been identified about 10 Russian armies assembling their forces. If 10 Russian armies are fully mobilized, an army is a Russian army is roughly 10 divisions, give or take. So a division is Russian division's over 10,000 at full mobilization. Each one of those armies at full mobilization is 100,000.
Speaker 2:That makes a million, man, mobilization. We're not talking about a hundred thousand mobilization here. We're talking about something much larger. And I think this morning, you may be saw the news items and the last couple days where the Pentagon is saying, the forces now on the border are sufficient to overwhelm the Ukrainian defenders, especially since Ukraine hasn't responded by mobilizing. This is the normal procedure, by the way, in countries in war is that if your neighbor mobilizes, you have to, pretty much, if you want to be defended.
Speaker 2:And that's just accepted. In World War I, a Russian general very famously said mobilization is war. Because at the time, Serbia, remember the archduke, Francis Ferdinand, got assassinated by the Black Hand. The Serbians the Austrians started mobilizing. The Serbians mobilized.
Speaker 2:The Russians started to mobilize to defend the Serbians. The Kaiser wrote the Willy Nikki letter saying, don't mobilize because we'll have to mobilize, and then war will start. And the Russians mobilized anyway. The tsar got talked out of it by his generals because his generals wanted the war because they thought they could win because they relied with the French. The French wanted the war because they wanted Alsace and Lorraine back.
Speaker 2:So everybody ended up mobilizing and going to war because mobilization is war. And the thing is what's interesting about this is NATO, America, even Ukraine are looking at this mobilization and saying, oh, no, there's no threat. He's not really going to do it. So I'm going to let the Russian military go to full mobilization, be completely capable not only of overrunning Ukraine, but when they get done with that, with the Blitzkrieg in Ukraine, be in a position then to start dictating to NATO because they don't have to send those troops home. And NATO is not mobilizing.
Speaker 2:I mean, Biden put 8,500 troops, on emergency alert to send to Poland and Romanians. Some people said, oh, he's gonna send them to Ukraine. No. He's not. And if you look at a military map yeah.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Why does Russia Ukraine's obviously not a threat to them. So why is it is this just, you know, kind of a a step towards a, you know, global hegemony? Or what's the why does Russia even want to overtake Ukraine?
Speaker 2:Well, Putin there's multiple levels to this. Putin has always said, and he said it for years now, that Ukraine is not a sovereign country. It's not a real country. Okay? And by the way, if we go back to the nineteen nineties, I think it was General Grachev, the defense minister of the Russian Federation, went to Brussels in front of the NATO Council and basically said, all the former Soviet Republics that directly border on Russia are near abroad.
Speaker 2:And they don't have normal sovereignty. We have the right to send troops into those countries anytime we want. So that's just been the way it's been. And in 2014, Russia invaded Ukraine, annexed Crimea, started a civil war in Eastern Ukraine. And in 02/2008, they invaded Georgia and annexed parts of Georgia, parts of what's in Gushetia.
Speaker 2:And then there's another enclave along the Black Sea Coast. Basically, those enclaves open up the mountain passes so that Georgia is basically defenseless. If the Russians decide to go into Georgia, it's not defensible. The country can't be defended. And that was really the purpose of the 02/2008 incursion by the Russians was to make sure that they had the position in the future that they could just go in there at any time and they couldn't be stopped.
Speaker 2:If you look at the map of Ukraine, by the way, if you look at have you seen any of the military maps of the deployments?
Speaker 1:No, I haven't.
Speaker 2:Well, let me describe it so you have a good idea. Ukraine is almost encircled by the Russian forces now. You know that Belarusia is in military union with Russia. Its armed forces, which are supposedly engaged in military exercises, but they're not in the places they said they would be doing the exercises. Their military is getting ready.
Speaker 2:The Russians have moved tens of thousands of troops into Belarusia. Railroad cars have been moving into their laying supplies and the foundations for an offensive from that territory. Mostly mechanized infantry troops, although Russia's elite paratrooper divisions, paratroop divisions are deployed almost close to the Polish border in deployment maps I've seen. So you have all the way in the North. And why paratroops over here?
Speaker 2:Because paratroops can rapidly be dropped behind Kyiv and cut the country off from NATO, block the roads and railroads, stop supplies. And so there's the North. And then the East, you have the regular Russian deployments there in the East Of Ukraine. And then a large deployment in Crimea, unbelievably large, with amphibious vessels brought in so that they could land on the East Bank of the Dnieper River. They can land against Odessa.
Speaker 2:And then in Moldova, in the Moldovan supposedly independent former Soviet Republic, there's, an enclave where a Russian mechanized regiment's been deployed. And they could beef that up in the next couple weeks because Russia's going to take a couple more weeks of deploying, I believe, before they do anything because this is a this is a serious big buildup. And they have in previous buildups, they haven't moved fuel forward. They've been playing a shell game with their fuel. They have, been the report you maybe saw, they've made preparations.
Speaker 2:Our intelligence has detected to move blood for wounded soldiers forward. This is not this is not
Speaker 1:This is serious.
Speaker 2:Yeah. It is it is serious. And yet the West, this is the attitude. You know, except for the Pentagon who they're the military experts. Right?
Speaker 2:The president of Ukraine says, oh, nothing's gonna happen. It's just an exercise. And and the politicians in Europe have gotten to the point where they really can't don't wanna say anything because any country that says anything gets Russia and says, you better shut up or we're gonna do something to you. Right? We won't say what we're gonna do to you, but we're gonna when when when Sweden and Finland talked about joining NATO here, Russia threatened them.
Speaker 2:On specific threats, but they threatened them. And the Swedish I think it was the Swedish defense minister said, excuse me. Sweden is a sovereign country. We can make alliance with whoever we want, and we know you're threatening us. Your drones have been flying over our nuclear power plant.
Speaker 2:Right? So Sweden should be concerned. They are worried. They they they got rid of their military after the end of the Cold War. And with with the twenty fourteen invasion of Ukraine, they said, oh my gosh.
Speaker 2:The Russians could move on us, and they could take us over in a fortnight. Oh, no. They could take us over in a few days. We have no defense. So they started rebuilding.
Speaker 2:Same thing with Finland. These countries started to realize, you know, these countries I mean, the Baltic states the Russians make a big thing about the Baltic states join NATO, and that threatens us. Do you know what the Baltic state militaries are like? They're like infantry brigades that have almost no combat potential in the modern context. Right?
Speaker 2:The Russians have powerful artillery brigades made up of missile artillery that some of them have a thermobaric bomb warheads that are the equivalent of a tactical nuclear weapon. These countries couldn't withstand Russia for I mean, you you would I mean, the Baltic States would be overrun by Russia in a matter of a day or two. There's there's would be no defense. Poland's Poland's what do they got? 15 brigades maybe?
Speaker 2:They couldn't. They can't defend the Slovakia Gap or Bialystok for more than a day or two. They did a war game in Poland here recently to see how they would do against the Russian invasion. And by the way, the Russian forces in Belarus, Russia are even greater than that war game depicted what they would be, what they're going to be. I think if I remember right, in four or five days, Warsaw fell.
Speaker 2:And Poland had to surrender. So the idea that NATO is a threat to Russia, we know. I mean, if you've read the press, the French military, which is the strongest army in NATO in Europe. I mean, the strongest army in NATO is The United States, but most of our forces are all over the world. And the next strongest is Turkey, but Turkey is not in Europe.
Speaker 2:Turkey's in, you know, in, what we call Asia Minor. The French army is not ready for a peer to peer war. They won't be ready for two, three more years. They've created initiatives to make their army ready, but they've lay let their army go. They don't have the conventional strength.
Speaker 2:Germany, the German army is a disgrace. It's much smaller than the French army. And their tank formations, they've even said, we have to pull them out of the line. They're not they they would just be wiped out. They're not trained properly.
Speaker 2:They don't have the proper logistics. Their U boats have been out of order for a couple of years. God knows if any of them could go to sea. Last time I saw a news item on them and it was like they were in a hopeless condition. Italy and Spain, they have their rapid deployment forces.
Speaker 2:Those are pretty good troops, but those are light infantry troops, and there's not that many of them. What has NATO got? The Polish, the rapid deployment forces, the French, if they can get their act together, the Turks. Turks are gonna be defending Turkey, not Europe. NATO is and by the way, as the Russians promised to get rid of their tactical nuclear forces at the end of the Cold War, they put them in storage, and now they've brought them out again.
Speaker 2:They have 20,000 tactical nuclear weapons.
Speaker 1:So that leads me to. My next question with this is that so you and I have talked before, and you've said, basically, they they feigned the fall of communism as a just to throw everybody off. But, actually, it was it was out of strength that they pretended to fall and that the Russians and the Chinese have had a long time, you know, packed in in a group to work together to eventually bring down the West. So do you think that that that Ukraine is potentially a strategic place for the West, for The United States and NATO to place weapons, you know, to to aim them at, you know, Russia, and that is Russia potentially taking Ukraine and Putin being backed by Xi part of a bigger plan to engage The US and start to advance on the overall what I understand from you to be a bigger plan to bring down the West.
Speaker 2:The main target of Russian and Chinese strategy is to destroy and defeat The United States. Because if The United States doesn't exist as a major power, all the other countries have to come to terms with Russia and China. That's just as simple. That's sort of an a b c simple way to look at it. And yeah, you've kind of outlined what I've been saying, which is incredible to most people because most people haven't read the defector literature.
Speaker 2:They haven't looked at the strategic moves. And I'll I'll try to make it simple. Russia's strategic orientation, that is what they want and what they've been acting to get over the last thirty years, has been misunderstood. And China's strategic orientation has been misunderstood. China's our economic partner.
Speaker 2:They're our buddies. They're making 50% of our medicines. They're not building the world's largest navy anymore. No. Oh, wait a minute.
Speaker 2:They are. They have more warships than we do. Russian and Chinese navies now are combined twice as big as ours. And they have hypersonic missiles, which basically make our aircraft carriers obsolete. That's not an accident.
Speaker 2:That's policy. That all happened intentionally while we were dealing with Afghanistan, where we lost, and Iraq, where we lost, because Iraq is gonna become a subsidiary of Iran because they're all Shiite. Right? We made democracy there, so the Shiites ended up so they become part of Iran. And we paid all those trillions so that those countries could become part of the Eastern Bloc.
Speaker 2:That's what we really essentially did because we didn't know what we were doing strategically. So these two orientations of Russia and China have not been understood. Now, it's very important to mask your goals strategically. Because if the West understood that they were our enemy and they were been working against us the whole time while pretending to be our friend and pretending to be more democratic or reforming, we would have taken some more precautions. But we didn't because we didn't realize it.
Speaker 2:And the actual strategy that Russia and China are following was adopted in 1960 after intensive planning in the late 1950s under Khrushchev. With the agreement of Mao Zedong, a false split between Russia and China was agreed upon to bring the West in to build up China because Russia did not have the economic wherewithal to build up China. It was an option
Speaker 1:China was tied to Russia,
Speaker 2:The US
Speaker 1:would have never gone in there and built up a communist competitor.
Speaker 2:Right. I mean, in the nineteen fifties, people called China Soviet China. In the nineteen sixties, they called it Red China. And so a false split. And then the other operation, long term operation they went on was to convince the West that Russia was no longer run by communists and therefore posed no threat to the West.
Speaker 2:And the whole idea being that when the West went to sleep, they would build up in the next decades and overtake the West, and then present the West with the fate of being so strong that the West has to basically give up or be crushed. And this outline of Russian Chinese strategy was first presented publicly in 1984 in a book, a very controversial book, by a Russian defector named Anatoly Golitsyn. The book was called New Lies for Old. It was published by Dodd and Mead. And in the book, there were 140 falsifiable predictions about what Russia and China would do in the future.
Speaker 2:And the predictions are still coming true because he said they would be aligned, that their dispute would be suddenly resolved and they would be allies and it would be one clenched fist, which we're seeing now. And if you were to read Glitzman's book and then look at the documents, the evidence, the testimony, the other defectors since then, whatever errors Glitzman made and people will point out the errors and say he was wrong about everything. No, he was 94% right in 1994. And he's like 97% right now because the one clenched fist he predicted has now emerged. So his predictions are right.
Speaker 2:And if it sounds incredible that they could have done this deception, I challenge everybody, read Galitsyn's book, then read Karen Dwish's book, Putin's Kleptocracy. And keep in mind, Dwish says Russia was taken taken over by a mafia under Putin, Putin, the KGB guy. Well, I would submit in a country where criminals have no rights like they do in America. The KGB is the ultimate criminal organization, and they corralled all the other criminals. So the mafia the KGB didn't start working for the mafia.
Speaker 2:The mafia started working for the KGB and the communist structures that were hidden underneath. And and I've heard a very smart Ukrainian, I know, said, we are not fighting the KGB. We're fighting the Communist Party Soviet Union underground that still exists, still controls Ukraine, still controls Russia. And this is why Ukraine is not mobilizing because it's essentially still Soviet, and they want the they want it to be as bloodless as possible when they go in. So do you think that's why
Speaker 1:the president of Ukraine is just appearing to lie down?
Speaker 2:Yes. Absolutely. And, he was elected basically with Russian money. Same thing with his predecessor Poroshenko, who the chocolate his chocolate shops in Moscow never closed. So what I would say, you read Golitsyn and then you read Dwiesha talks in detail about the changes in Russia.
Speaker 2:And if you look at those details after reading Golitsyn, how he said the changes would be false and would be controlled, all the evidence that Dwiesha presents and is massive could be interpreted, could actually it confirms Golitsyn. She's just come to the wrong conclusion about who's ultimately behind it. And so that's my overarching analysis. That's why this is to me, this is much more dangerous, what's going on now, than even with the Pentagon is Pentagon's very panicked because military experts. When you some of the maps you see about the deployment shows is done in battalion tactical groups.
Speaker 2:But actually, Russia's reaffirmed the division system. So, when you see the names, when they've identified the names of armies, corps, and divisions, and brigades are becoming divisions, and divisions are becoming corps, when you begin to when you understand their mobilization system and you look at the maps with the names, you go, oh, no. This isn't this isn't a mobilization of 250,000 men. It's 500,000 to a million men, and it's not over. And it's the mobilization's been going on now for ten weeks and two more.
Speaker 2:So this is and there's no reaction. No mobilization in the West. What is this? What comes and then China's mobilized. China's people are speculating that China is going to strike at Taiwan or maybe a wider strike.
Speaker 2:And here, I think you maybe you heard the news that, they've been loading tanks on the West Coast to be going somewhere across the Pacific.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Yeah. So what do you I guess, what what do you see playing out next? And I've got some more questions of how this relates to COVID and some of the the the plans that relate to that because that's, you know, like, as I understand, well, China's original intentions was to release a biological weapon that would weaken America and enable a an easy kinetic war on our soil to claim you know, because, you know, we know that China is, you know, struggling to feed its own people on top of a million other problems that have it really on on the the brink of collapse. So how does this all play out, and what do you see unfolding?
Speaker 2:Well, I'm not as optimistic as I was some months ago because more news has come about. It turns out that China does not have a deficit in food. As many people speculated, they think the Chinese liked that speculation. The stories that their warehouses were empty and their food was rotted away, that was disinformation. Now you see recent stories that China has most of the food on the planet that's in storage is in China.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Saw that come out in the past three or four
Speaker 2:years. And this is very alarming because why would they stockpile that tremendous amount of food? They are doing that because the only reason to do that is in anticipation of a war because their supplies of food in The US, Canada, Australia, Argentina, etcetera, would be cut off in the first months of war. And that a biological war, which could involve the use of anti crop biological weapons that we could use on them, might make growing problematic. And they have to make sure with 1,400,000,000 people that they're going to have enough food.
Speaker 2:So that's alarming. That's very alarming. Now, the collapse of their economy. Maybe I mentioned this on your show earlier. I talked to a Wall Street Banker because I'm in the committee on the present danger China.
Speaker 2:And I attend their meetings. And this banker is very well informed on the economic moves back and forth. And he was quite pleased because he said China's making all these terrible mistakes. They are collapsing their own economy. How are they collapsing it?
Speaker 2:By getting ready for war.
Speaker 1:Yeah. Moving into a war economy. Which will collapse
Speaker 2:economy is collapsing their peacetime economy. Yes. And this is rather obvious to him, that that and this, of course, going into a war solves a lot of their economic problems because they tell their people, we're rationing everything, and everything's gonna become harder because the Americans have been aggressive and they've pushed us to the wall and we have to fight back. That's the propaganda in China. That's what every totalitarian country blames the countries they're about to invade and attack and bomb.
Speaker 2:They blame their victim. That's Stalin outlined that years ago. That's what you do. And that's what they're doing. But the thing is that, yeah, they're civilian.
Speaker 2:They're not going to be producing consumer goods for us because they won't be able to ship them here because they're planning something larger. Now, you asked about the pandemic.
Speaker 1:Yeah. I'll I'll frame a little more of that question because like you have, it seemed like there was a perfect scenario. And if you look back and look at event two zero one, look at, you know, lockstep that came out in 2010, that there is a scenario of using the pandemic to introduce this, you know, global technocracy and using it to, you know, what we're seeing, you know, what we're seeing the truckers fight back against in Canada is that we, know, luck have seen their rights completely stripped away, and that they're doing that. Now, we also talked about how the first round of the biological, you know, attack of COVID was supposed to wipe out more people. So do you think that the the globalist plan that you think of, they think globalist, the UN, the World Economic Forum, etcetera, to use the pandemic to bring in these totalitarian measures, Do you think that that perhaps had failed, and now they're having to go to maybe the backup plan, which is pushing for a war, which we love the globalist love wars because it it fuels, you know, fuels their economy, fuels their, you know, fills their coffers.
Speaker 1:Or do you think that and I guess in addition to that, you know, why is it that we now have George Soros, who's typically you look at as being one of the more kind of globalist, you know, person tied over to to Europe. You know, why is he now coming out attacking Xi saying that, you know, the the Olympics or, you know, Nazi Germany era Olympic, you know, facade of propaganda and that Xi's inability to contain, you know, the virus in China is gonna lead to his collapse. I guess, like, how do you make sense of that stage?
Speaker 2:Well, what do you mean by the word globalist?
Speaker 1:When I think of globalist, I think of the people like the UN, the people that are pushing more towards that, the the the vision of the build back better, the one world government that they've been pushing.
Speaker 2:Well, the the UN is the one world government, already has been since 1945. It's not much of a government. They haven't broken down national sovereignty. When you mentioned George Soros, George Soros came out of communist Hungary. He was an immigrant, I think to The UK initially.
Speaker 2:How does a person as a poor immigrant end up going to a Western country and becoming a billionaire? You suppose he did it without help? He was coming from the communist bloc. And if you follow his career, he's been financing the communist left. And of course, he makes a big show out of being the enemy of Putin and Russia, right, of supporting Ukrainian independence and fighting China.
Speaker 2:He's not to be believed. He's I think he's a laundromat for communist overseas money. That's what I think he is. I mean, it's very hard to prove anything like that. But that's if you look at him closely, there's no way he can be honest.
Speaker 2:And, the show he puts on to be an enemy of Putin, he did nothing of the kind. He hasn't hurt Putin at all. He's hurt The United States by supporting the left here. And what is the policy of the left? Not to rebuild America's nuclear arsenal, which is rotting away.
Speaker 2:Minuteman 3s. They were deployed when I was a little boy in the '60s. These are old, old missiles. We got rid of our newer missiles, the MX. We got rid of them under George W.
Speaker 2:Bush. Our nuclear warheads are actually, they're really past their life. They've had to tone them down to keep them. And the head of the strategic command said in 2020 in February in testimony before Congress two years ago, he said, in three years, the arsenal will be basically past its shelf life, unreliable. We're going to have an and we won't have a new nuclear warhead.
Speaker 2:We're trying to build the infrastructure to rebuild them until 2029. Russians have new nuclear warheads. The Chinese have new nuclear warheads, new missiles, hypersonic missiles, all kinds of new weapons. We welfare for the Pentagon is not mostly for weapons. And as far as the globalist loving war, no, no.
Speaker 2:Money, you lose money in war. War is destruction. It destroys things. They are soft bourgeois people. And what is a globalist?
Speaker 2:A banker. People have this misunderstanding. The banks put this person in power. You know what the banks gave to both sides in the election? Either one that gets into power, you say, no.
Speaker 2:The bay. People who are wealthy have to buy insurance, political insurance, because they can be prosecuted. They can be investigated. They can be harassed by the government. They need the government to be at least listening to them, not to go after them.
Speaker 2:You look again, over the we've put businessmen in jail all the time. And we're a capitalist country. And of course, businessmen aren't perfect. And the governments in the Western countries aren't the puppets of businessmen. Some senators and politicians are bought by them.
Speaker 2:But that's the insurance the businessmen are paying. So look at how everybody was pushed into China. President Trump made this point again and again. My friends wish they could invest in America, but they invest in China because that's the only investment that pays. Right?
Speaker 2:Because everything was structured that way. Now I ask you how great or wise or strategically informed are the, capitalists? All they do is they calculate profit and loss. And the communists knew that. And they look at the cheap labor in China.
Speaker 2:And they just said China is good. Come on in. Do business with us. And it was irresistible. The the West could not resist it because capitalism is not like the system in Russia or China, which is oriented toward military and political power and dominance.
Speaker 2:The West is oriented toward making money and and making things that make life better for people. The standard of living is high in the West. If if if this was all a conspiracy to pauperize us and make us poor, it's a darn poor conspiracy because we've lived very well for many decades. But you look at Russia and China, the people don't live so well because they're building weapons because it's all about global dominance. Know, Mao Zedong said political power flows out of the barrel of a gun.
Speaker 2:Alright? Well, people, the globalist, it's all about money. Alright? You have all the money. We'll have all the guns.
Speaker 2:Stick them up. Now we have all the money and all the guns. That's what's going on. It's actually playing out right in front of us. But I didn't answer your question about COVID.
Speaker 2:Isn't it interesting that COVID breaks out of China? That's their alibi. Right? They got it first. It breaks out.
Speaker 2:COVID breaks out in China, and then the mobilizations start in China and Russia. And we're closer to world war than ever. And, look at what the pandemic has done. The lockdowns have damaged our economies, have ruined the dollar. On the eve of a war, what do you need?
Speaker 2:You need money for tanks and weapon. We have no money. Our budgets are all busted. We we can't even afford to mobilize because it would break the bank. And there's the Russians and Chinese getting and we just have to live in this denial and say, nothing here.
Speaker 2:Move along. It's just you know?
Speaker 1:And the mandates are weakening our military
Speaker 2:and the mandates. I mean, you've you've vaccinated a lot of military people. And I think, as you know, it's coming out that the vaccines don't work. It's coming out that there are vaccine injuries. And this is going to add to the discredit of the Western governments because at a war, what do you need?
Speaker 2:You need people to believe in the government at the beginning of a war because the government's going to tell them how to be safe and how to fight. And yet this government, these governments in Western Europe and The United States and Canada have bungled so badly in this pandemic that who the most patriotic citizens don't trust their own government.
Speaker 1:Yeah, I think that the American trust in our government is probably the lowest it's ever been right now.
Speaker 2:Oh, yeah. And then and when the government see the longer they delay in admitting they made a mistake in their policy policies regarding the pandemic. And also to cover up the fact that China released it and that it was a bioweapon. And that the Chinese so brilliantly look, the Chinese infiltrated our you look at our drug companies. They're all in bed with China.
Speaker 2:You look at Fauci. He's in bed with China. They say, oh, the the global elite in Fauci made the weapon, the They couldn't make it here because it was illegal because they had some crazy scheme. They made it in China, and the Chinese released it. Isn't that perfect?
Speaker 2:The Chinese have an alibi. Fauci did it. Blame Fauci. But look, it's part of a coordinated, strategic, carefully thought out set of moves. They have hurt us badly in a giant sabotage.
Speaker 2:It's a toxic weapon. The spike protein is toxic. This bioweapon was a toxic weapon. They sabotaged our health system. Look at nurses, doctors quitting all over the place.
Speaker 2:Our health system is ready to collapse. So when the next weapon, maybe hemorrhagic fever, is released, they'll just be panic. Nobody will trust the government. They won't know what to do. If it hasn't been for these doctors, these courageous doctors who've risked their licenses and have stood up, we wouldn't have a basis for defense.
Speaker 2:Our basis for defense is those doctors. And I think we've gotten off light because I think the weapon that the Chinese developed didn't work, wasn't as effective as they hoped because it had a high rate of mutation. The government's got to admit. They've got to admit they failed. They've got to say we were wrong.
Speaker 2:And they've got to recoup their credibility. If they don't do it, it's look at what's happening. And now if all the governments have reacted badly in Ukraine and improperly in the Far East, Russia and China have shown themselves to be in control internationally. Look. Putin is gonna be meeting with Xi on the fourth.
Speaker 2:What is that Friday? And not only that, the the he's gonna be meeting with the leaders of France and Germany. So he's already got the beginning of splitting NATO. If NATO splits and Europe is so frightened it makes a separate deal with Russia, we're all alone. And it's all then set the stage is set for Russia and China to come after us.
Speaker 1:Is that what you see playing out?
Speaker 2:I think that's what they've been planning for a long time. And I I've talked to defectors. Colonel Stanislav Lunev was a military defector. He outlined a lot of this to me years ago. They have divided up North America.
Speaker 2:I think I've mentioned this on the program. Lunev said that the last time he was at a meeting of the Russian generals, this was under the Russian Federation, not under the Soviet Union. They said the nuclear war plan against America is still on. We are going to divide North America as follows. Russia gets Alaskan parts of Canada.
Speaker 2:China gets a lower 48. And we know from the secret speech of Qi Haochen, they want the lower 48 because they want to exterminate most of the population here. They want to colonize it, make a second China here because China's overpopulated. They need to move about 700,000,000 people somewhere else.
Speaker 1:Their land no longer supports them.
Speaker 2:Right. And to do that, it's to avoid getting nuclear retaliation themselves. To do it, they need to do it in special stages. And about invading Ukraine, it's a complicated thing because Ukraine is basically already a Soviet country. It could be rolled back into the Soviet Union in a fortnight.
Speaker 2:That's what Boris Ciccolay, who wrote a paper on this years ago, said that Ukraine was set up after the fall of the Soviet Union in such a way these are his exact words as to be rolled back into the union in a fortnight. So will they actually invade it? If they do it, I predict it will be a nonchalous. All you got are these people, Andrei Olerianov saying they don't have enough troops. Andrei is not a military expert.
Speaker 2:And he says the the Ukrainian soldiers will fight. I heard from a Ukrainian in Eastern Ukraine. He says the army is demoralized. The generals aren't getting ready. They're not they're not doing what they need to to defend against Russia.
Speaker 2:They know if the Russians attack, it will be all all over in a matter of days. So it's it's already set to be a surrender at Anschluss. Basically, what happened to Austria in 1938. The German troops moved in. There was no defense.
Speaker 2:There was no fight fighting. They just they just went over. And if you look at Ukrainian opinion polls, yes, in Western Ukraine, you have very virulent anti Moscow pocket of opinion. Maybe 20% to 25% of Ukrainian opinion is virulently hostile to Russia. But they even they most of them don't understand it's still the Soviet Union.
Speaker 2:Although you will hear Ukrainians who do understand that. But the bulk of Ukrainians say the Russians are our Slavic brothers. You know? Okay. If we have to be in union with we'd like to be part of the EU, but if America's being bad and Russia's being threatened, maybe we have to be part of Russia again.
Speaker 2:I don't think we've understood the Ukrainian system or the Ukrainian people and that this this switch of Ukraine, and especially if NATO breaks, there could be a negotiation like what happened in Czechoslovakia in 1938. The West just sort of caved and said, all right. They handed the Sudetenland over and the Czech state broke apart. Slovakia left Czechoslovakia separated. And the Germans just occupied the remainder, Moravian Bohemia, the Czech parts of Czechoslovakia.
Speaker 2:There was no battle. And the Czech fortifications and the Czech military was considered quite good. And it was quite inconceivable that the Germans would have an easy time of it, but they did. And that could be in a very studied way with cooperation from Russia's Agents and friends in Ukraine could be accomplished without, you know, people say they never do this with this violence. Well, yeah, they they're willing to take the chance, I think and this buildup is very serious, very big.
Speaker 1:So, of the three world powers, United States, Russia, China, we're in a situation where The United States is on its knees. It's crippled by COVID. It's crippled by Biden, you know, in the White House. You know, we didn't see these things happening under Trump under under the the military buildup of him. We saw that I think that you saw lot more respect for America under Trump, whereas now it's just, you know, we see what's happening.
Speaker 1:And so we saw while we see America crippled, we see the two big bullies now strengthening and and teaming up together on the the so where's the where's the hope for America? Where's the, how can we get through this? Where do you see this this going?
Speaker 2:Well, The United States, I mean, first of all, no United States shouldn't have engaged in the military adventures in here, Afghanistan and Iraq. That was a waste of resources. It was ridiculous. Nothing was achieved strategically. We were lured into there by the nineeleven attack.
Speaker 2:And, of course, Al Qaeda, if you look at the testimony of Alexander Lebanonko, Al Qaeda was completely infiltrated by Russian intelligence. The Russians used Al Qaeda.
Speaker 1:Trained, funded, everything.
Speaker 2:Well, Ayman al Zawari, the head of Al Qaeda, was trained after Bin Laden's death, was trained in Russia. And many other leaders were according to Levvenenko. And Levvenenko paid the ultimate price for going public as a former FSB officer. He was poisoned by Putin's agent, Lugovoi, I think was his name. They found the traces of the radioactive polonium on the Lufthansa airplanes that he flew for Moscow into London.
Speaker 2:And he poisoned the guy. And he died, a horrible death of radiation poisoning. And he said Putin did it. And why did Putin do it? Because he was telling the truth.
Speaker 2:He said Putin is the terrorist. Putin is behind nineeleven. He's behind the whole terror thing. And what did it do? It lured us into these mistaken adventures in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Speaker 2:So how do we the the one advantage we have is we're far away from Russia and China. We have oceans between us. Although the Russians and Chinese are moving in to support Cuba and Venezuela, Chile has gone over with a, pro communist politician being elected. Peru's new president is a communist. I'm told I was told by the former vice president of conversation with him a couple months back.
Speaker 2:You've got Honduras. Castro was her name. The new president's going to I don't know if the inauguration has happened yet. But I guess Vice President Harris is going to be present. So these Latin American countries are going over to communism.
Speaker 2:And they're talking about forming a kind of block of countries. Hugo Chavez's chief of air staff, I interviewed him twenty years ago and says, the whole goal is to create a communist bloc in South America, Latin America. That was Chavez's dream. Chavez was a communist, a friend of Fidel. We're being people say, NATO surrounded Russia.
Speaker 2:No. We're being surrounded. We're being isolated. It's the other way around. And we're not arming, and we're not defending, and we're not and and this thing is, we're a big threat.
Speaker 2:We're a horrible yeah. Where's your bomb shelter? The Russians and Chinese have bomb shelters. They have prepared civil defenses. They have Russia's deployed multiple regiments of their new S500 ABM system.
Speaker 2:We don't have any real ABMs. Our ABMs are experimental. Hit a rocket with a rocket. There's 50 launchers in Alaska and, like, 14 in California. They can't stop a Russian missile.
Speaker 2:They probably can't stop a Chinese missile. Maybe a North Korean missile they could stop. This is not real defense. We don't have real defenses. We haven't been defending.
Speaker 2:We don't have defenses against biological war as the pandemic shows. We have traitors and corrupt officials who can easily be manipulated into the wrong policies, policies that will make the biological attack stronger than it otherwise would have been. So that even a miscarried biological attack would have more effect. So this is what we're mold out. We're full of traders.
Speaker 2:We're ideologically divided. How are we a threat to them? They've prepared this for decades. The analysis here is very clear. Even though people were all distracted by it's the Jews and the banksters and all this the antisemitism and the conspiracy theories and the no.
Speaker 2:It's no. You haven't understood. How many divisions does the pope have? Was Stalin cynical, you know, like we're gonna we're gonna take over Poland, the Pope will object, you know? No.
Speaker 2:How many divisions does the Bank of America have? How many divisions does, you know, any of the globalists have? Or how many missiles or how many nuclear what? No. It's like Mao said, political power flows out of the barrel of a gun.
Speaker 2:And the ultimate gun is a missile with a nuclear warhead or an Xander missile with a thermobaric bomb warhead. You can't we don't understand. We have not kept up with this. And I hear the analysts, and I just grieve. I just grieve at the lack of clarity and how easily they have been misdirected to looking at the wrong things.
Speaker 2:You gotta look at baseball. Keep your eye on the ball. Remember, you kid, you're playing baseball. Your dad's shouting, keep your eye on the ball. We have not kept our eye on the ball.
Speaker 2:It's that simple.
Speaker 1:Now the ball's coming pretty strongly.
Speaker 2:Yeah. Yep. So what do
Speaker 1:you see playing out over the course of the next couple of years?
Speaker 2:It's very difficult to predict, because the Russians and Chinese strategists are so good, and they're so good at misdirection. They're so good at making you think they're going here and then they go there. They always have surprises. You see, surprise is a basic strategic element. You can only flank or leverage successfully if you surprise.
Speaker 2:If you prepare a flanking action and the enemy sees it in advance, they're there on the flank ready to protect. So you have to every move and of course, what I see is we're open and we're still not getting it. We're still not understanding their strategy. You have to know the mind of the enemy. So I think what they wanna do is they wanna break down NATO.
Speaker 2:That's the number one objective of Russia. So watch these negotiations between Putin and the new German chancellor, Olef Scholes, and, of course, French, President Macron. Watch the meeting between Putin and Xi at the beginning of the Olympics, the Genocide Olympics. Right? Watch that.
Speaker 2:Watch for further trouble in the Far East because and then watch for look, it was just reported the Russians jammed the GPS over Israel the other day. I don't know if you did you see that news item?
Speaker 1:No. I didn't.
Speaker 2:That even endangered flights going into Ben Gurion Airport in Israel. And the Israelis complained. And the Russians said, we're defending ourselves. We're having exercises with the Syrian Air Force, and we're we're making sure you're not gonna cause us any trouble. And, of course, Israel is very concerned that Iran is getting close, that they have to there's there's indications there could be a war between Iran and Israel in The Middle East.
Speaker 2:Why wouldn't that be a thing? War between Iran and Israel and The Middle East. The Russian army fully mobilized and absorbing Ukraine by whatever means, forcing NATO to come to terms. China, ready to go against Taiwan, ready to put Japan under the most horrific pressure you can imagine in Australia, and maybe North Korea forcing the issue between North and South Korea. And look at who the South Korean president is.
Speaker 2:I mean, the guy is basically just ready to give in to the communists because of his own left wing view. So what do we got? We have a formula for them suddenly advancing to a position of global dominance very quickly in a way that we can't counter. And I don't know why they wouldn't do it. Why wouldn't they?
Speaker 2:We have believed falsely in our own strength, which has been partly a myth all these decades. And you can't hardly convince an American that Russia and China aren't enemies. You can't hardly convince an American that we aren't the lone superpower, that Russia is just a regional power like Obama used to say. No, no, no. Russia has a bigger nuclear arsenal than us, more modernized.
Speaker 2:How can Russia then just be a regional power? Russian and Chinese navies are bigger than us. Their ability to transport troops over bodies of water is greater than us combined because now the Hong Kong merchant marine is under China. And the Chinese and the Hong Kong merchant marine are bigger than ours. So whatever sea lift capacity we have, they have more.
Speaker 2:And you had rushes. I'm sorry, but Alaska will be under threat. The the homeland is under threat. You watch Mexico. You watch Cuba.
Speaker 2:Are there troops or missiles being moved into the Western Hemisphere? I think that may come next. I think that The United States and with this administration, you can guarantee they will do the exact wrong thing in response. They will talk a good line, and people will go, there's nothing to worry about. That's the way it's been with us.
Speaker 2:Always.
Speaker 1:So do you think that and we're nearing our our hour before we jump over, you know, q and a. But do you think that China with the economic problems, I know they have the food stores. But they're also as you talked about, know, with the grand solar minimum and just Mother Nature wreaking havoc on them, not to mention the pollution and everything. Are they in a position where they have to take action or else they are crippled? As we talked about previously, that they're in this tight spot, it's either, you know, risk moving forward with the war, and, or just stay, you know, stagnant and and collapse.
Speaker 2:Yeah. I think I've mentioned before, I, I spoke to a Hong Kong businessman, a few months ago who had been involved in China. He got kicked out of China. And he had contacts in Beijing. And they said something along these lines that China had no choice.
Speaker 2:That the timing is now that their plan was to come after us in 2035. That was the original plan. I think that Russia and China had agreed on. That's my guess. Because they always like to take it slow because slow is sure.
Speaker 2:Our guard is down. We're stupid. They can get their friends elected here in the West. They can guide our flight, so to speak, towards the crash landing that they need us to crash. But they have rushed things now.
Speaker 2:They're rushing it. And it may indeed be because of the grand solar minimum and the food shortages that are coming. We already saw the volcanic eruption in the South Pacific. And this is something that happens during grand solar minimums. The reduced electromagnetic activity of the sun correlates with increased volcanic activity.
Speaker 2:There's some kind of relationship. The kind of electromagnetic phenomenon that occurs in the Earth is somehow related to volcanic eruptions. And so this giant eruption, which put volcanic dust and ash up 150,000 feet, they've already announced there's going to be massive crop losses in the Southern Hemisphere because of lowered global temperatures. And already, grand solar minimum is causing havoc with food production. And we're really in a merciful position because the Earth is closer to the sun than it usually is in this period so that the effects are mitigated.
Speaker 2:But in the next couple of years, starting in 2025, that's going to start to alleviate. And the effects of the grand solar minimum are going to be felt in terms of the loss of grain production. It's definitely going to happen. So this could be driving their timing. It could be.
Speaker 1:And I guess one last question for you is what what do you make of the buses, the flights, the the shipments of fighting age men being brought in The United States in Florida and Westchester, New York Like, we're seeing increasingly, you know, videos coming out of these people, and they're not they're not women and children. These are, you know, people that are, you know, 30s, you know, 20s, 30s, 40s. Is that do you think that they're that's part of this plan?
Speaker 2:If you go back to your interview you did with me last summer, I had gotten information then through some people related to defense work who had contacts in in Eastern Europe. And they were told that the Russian special services, the Russian general staff had made agreements with the Mexican cartels to move weapons and Spetsnaz troops across the Mexican border. You may remember I had mentioned this. And I didn't know of any specific movement of people yet. They'd made the agreement.
Speaker 2:And there were Russian officials pretending to be Ukrainians, by the way, on the border being driven around by cartel people looking at different border crossings. I even was given photographs of some of these folks by some of my sources down on the border. So, now what's happened. I've got multiple sources telling me that Russian nationals of military age, single men, are crossing the border in large numbers. And this has been reported up the chain of command.
Speaker 2:And I'm told that so far there's been no reaction. It's sort of a panicked silence. It's like, what do we do? How do we react to that? And the reason this is scary is because in advance of a world war, not only would you expect a biological attack on the West before the war begins as a softening up thing, which is described in other defector literature like Viktor Suvorov's Spetsnaz, but there is a 6,000 to 8,000 man Spetsnaz deployment to The United States of sabotage Spetsnaz troops to deploy to infiltrate The United States in advance of a war and on a signal to go to their caches, get their uniforms, get their weapons.
Speaker 2:These weapons would include chemical, toxic, biological weapons, even nuclear weapons. Colonel Stanislav Lunev testified before Congress on this because he was tasked as the deputy head of the GRU in The US, which fought with finding hiding places for Russian nuclear weapons in The US. So they would smuggle them in, hide them for a few weeks or months, and then the attack when the assault would begin, we would be attacked from within first. That would be the first indications. And they are taking these steps now.
Speaker 2:So, this is serious. This is very serious.
Speaker 1:It is. Yeah, it is. But I I think that it's it's an important conversation to have. And I appreciate all of your research and all your thoughts on this because I think that, you know, while I well, for me, you know, when I take a step back, I do believe that God is in control. And that's where I have to because I think sometimes when it looks like we're up against the the edge of a cliff, that's where I find the strength to kind of keep going.
Speaker 1:Right? And so but I I also think that with that, you know, keep that in mind is that it's important to have these discussions and to look at these things and to look at, you know, actually, it's interesting because my Thursday show is all about prepping. So, I think it's a very appropriate show to have with this because you know, we we have to again, hope for the the hope for the best but prepare for the worst.
Speaker 2:Well, faith means that if you can't run, you walk. If you can't walk, you crawl, and if you can't crawl, you wriggle. You just keep going. Because nobody gets out of this life alive. And it's doing what's right that matters, sticking by the truth.
Speaker 2:And if we do that, eventually things will turn out right. But we haven't been very truthful in this country. We've lied to ourselves. And that is perhaps the worst kind of lying.
Speaker 1:Yeah, agree. Yeah, I agree. So, we're gonna transfer over to Q and A. I'm sure we've got a lot of good questions brewing up until 03:30. We'll do question and answers.
Speaker 1:So, the Q and A is over on Rise TV which you've all heard me talk about by by now. If you want to check it out, there's a link in the description for a free trial for it. Rise TV is a Patriot owned, Patriot run streaming platform. We've got a lot of amazing content on there. We do a lot of live shows on there.
Speaker 1:There's a lot more man in America on there. So, if you have questions for Jeff, which I'm sure you have some, come join us over there. And so we'll give you guys a minute or so to hop over there, but we're gonna go in the streams on YouTube and Facebook, which hopefully we're still on there because we talked a little bit about the things that they don't like us talking about, but you can avoid some of these discussions. So for everyone that joined us, thank you. And just one last reminder, in the description box, you can find a link to Jeff's blog.
Speaker 1:It's jrnyquist.blog. And, you know, Jeff is regularly publishing really good information on there. It's been a great resource for me to help you understand a lot, especially communism. He's been a great resource for communism. So, again, it's jrnyquist.blog, and that link is in description below.
Speaker 1:So, alright, folks. So, we're gonna say goodbye to YouTube, Rumble, and Facebook and join over there on Rise TV.