Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Tradition, pandemic rules, and women’s faith networks show religious authority working as political infrastructure.
From U.S. Traditional Latin Mass communities to Zimbabwe’s pandemic controls, the episode follows religious authority as it shapes law, identity, crisis governance, and women’s activism.
Covers 2026-10-19 to 2026-10-26; 5 free papers from 40 selected papers.
Where pulpits, courts, parties, and movements collide, this show follows the research behind the headlines on faith, power, identity, and democracy.
Episode covers 2026-10-19 – 2026-10-26.
Themes: religion, Catholic Church, Hindu nationalism, soft power, COVID-19, collective memory, gender, governance
Methods: qualitative, case-study, ethnographic, historical analysis, textual analysis, survey
Premium also covers 10 related news stories, including bishop-accountability.org — Cura tico abusador se ocultó en Honduras, newsocialgospel.org — This Week in Religion News: Faith, Politics, Identity, and the Courts - New Social Gospel, and europeanrelations.com — Pope Visit Tests French Secularism.
The premium version of this podcast covers all 40 research articles and 10 news stories selected for the episode. Subscribe to the premium podcast.
Generated by paperboy.fm.
Where pulpits, courts, parties, and movements collide, this show follows the research behind the headlines on faith, power, identity, and democracy.
Subscribe for the premium version of this podcast: https://paperboy.fm/podcasts/this-week-in-religion-and-politics/subscribe
Davis: When a church, party, or movement tells a story about who we are, how do you know if it is inspiring you or steering you?
Jenny: I want a simple test for that, honestly, because belonging feels warm until someone starts using it like a map for who counts and who doesn't.
Davis: Right, and most people don't meet political strategy as a memo; they meet it as a festival, a prayer, a family story, or a flag at the right moment.
Jenny: So the question is not just what the story says, but who gets governed by it, whose memory it protects, and what happens when the same story travels abroad.
Davis: Because if India sells religion overseas as universal and welcoming, while majoritarian politics at home makes it feel narrower, that soft power starts to wobble...welcome to This Week In Religion and Politics on paperboy.fm.
Jenny: This week we had about four hundred seventy search hits, and 50 made the cut. Those 50 papers include 78 unique authors across 28 countries, so the feed is smaller than last week but still pretty spread out.
Davis: The qualified-paper count is down 13 from 63 last week, a 20.6 percent drop. I’d read that first as a narrower funnel, not a colder field, because the search pool itself also got smaller.
Jenny: Right, query hits fell from 643 to 466, down 177, or 27.5 percent. The data doesn’t tell us whether that’s indexing lag, publication timing, or search-language drift, so that’s the live question rather than a conclusion.
Davis: The methods mix is very clear, though. Qualitative work dominates with 34 papers, meaning studies built from interviews, texts, fieldwork, or close reading rather than big-number modeling; after that it’s 6 case studies, 4 ethnographies, and 4 historical analyses.
Jenny: Country focus is flatter than usual at the top. Great Britain, India, and the United States each show up 3 times, which fits the week’s through-line: religion and politics operating as tools for governing identity, memory, crisis, and belonging.
Davis: The author mix is balanced in a useful way. Out of 78 authors, 29 are first-time authors, meaning first-ever paper in the metadata, not just new to us; 20 are emerging, and 29 are experienced, while the theme sweep is religion, the Catholic Church, Hindu nationalism, soft power, COVID-19, and collective memory.
Jenny: Alright, let's get into the papers with Portugal, and a 2026 Politics and Religion article by Inês Santos Almeida and Luís F. Mota called The Catholic Church and the politics of morality issues. They ask why a country with high religiosity and a strong Catholic Church still moved in a permissive direction on euthanasia and gender identity.
Jenny: Their answer is not that the Portuguese Catholic Church stayed quiet. It was active in both debates, especially at critical political moments in the euthanasia fight, and it mostly used moral arguments, meaning claims about right, wrong, human dignity, and the proper boundaries of life and identity.
Davis: So how did the authors tell the difference between the Church speaking loudly and the Church actually changing policy?
Jenny: They did qualitative content analysis, basically a structured close reading, of publications on two official Portuguese Catholic Church websites. That shows the Church's public strategy pretty clearly, including indirect pressure and some direct appeals to veto players, meaning officials who can block or slow a law, but it's weaker on backroom influence because they're not measuring private meetings, party bargaining, or lawmaker vote-switching.
Davis: That makes the practical lesson sharper than just, religion matters. If a Church lacks durable ties to parties, veto players, and a parliamentary majority, even a loud moral campaign can lose, so this first paper lands right on that thread of religious authority meeting law and finding out law has its own machinery.
Davis: That line about law having its own machinery travels pretty well here, because Giorgi Pareshishvili’s paper, Civilizational soft power and its limits, asks what happens when a state tries to turn religious identity into foreign policy after twenty fourteen.
Davis: The India case is the center, and the claim is sharp: Hindu identity is being used as soft power, meaning attraction rather than coercion, through four channels — yoga promotion, the twenty twenty-three G twenty presidency, sacred architecture, and diaspora mobilization.
Davis: The paradox is that the message abroad sounds universal, like Indian civilization belongs to everyone, while the politics at home can sound majoritarian, meaning one religious majority gets treated as the real nation.
Jenny: What would count as evidence that the soft power is actually being undermined, rather than just criticized by people who already dislike Hindu nationalism?
Davis: The paper gets there through qualitative discourse analysis, so basically a structured reading of official language and state-backed symbols, and it compares India with Orthodox Christianity in Russian and Georgian foreign policy to show this is a wider pattern, not just an India one-off.
Davis: But that also sets the limit: it maps the credibility gap very well, while it doesn’t measure foreign publics directly, so we don’t get polling that says yoga diplomacy rose or fell by a specific amount.
Jenny: So I’d treat this as a warning light, not a scoreboard: if a government sells inclusive civilizational identity abroad while narrowing belonging at home, the brand may still travel, but the trust behind it starts leaking.
Jenny: That leaking-trust point is a good bridge, because Trads is also about a community whose public image is doing a lot of work before anyone checks the people in the pews.
Jenny: Stephen Cranney and Stephen Bullivant look at Catholics in the United States who attend the Traditional Latin Mass, meaning the older Latin liturgy that many attendees mostly don't understand word for word, and they argue the group isn't just extreme, cult-like, or a youth rebellion.
Jenny: The plain version is that a lot of these Catholics seem to be seeking beauty, reverence, continuity, and a thick community identity, not simply a political costume or a rejection of every modern Catholic change after Vatican Two.
Davis: If most attendees don't speak Latin, what exactly are they getting from a Latin Mass community besides the language itself?
Jenny: The authors try to answer that by mixing ethnographic observation, which means watching the community in its ordinary setting, with original survey data and in-depth interviews, so they can compare what people say, what they do, and how the group describes itself; the big caveat is that the abstract promises a data-driven portrait, but the material we have doesn't give sample sizes.
Davis: That makes the practical takeaway pretty direct: church leaders should treat Latin Mass Catholics as a complicated American constituency, not as one psychological type, because this is tradition as identity work, built through worship, aesthetics, family life, and belonging.
Paperboy.fm: This is the free version of the podcast. Subscribe at paperboy.fm to access a dozen different paper review podcasts for five dollars a month.