Exploring the frontiers of Technology and AI
Josh:
If you bought SanDisk stock just a year ago, you're up 40 times your money.
Josh:
Micron, up eight times. Intel and AMD are both up almost four times what you
Josh:
would have put in just a year ago. And we thought this was an AI bubble.
Josh:
We were actually wrong about how it's going to play out. And we have the data
Josh:
to back this up. Now this year, five of the biggest companies in the world are
Josh:
going to spend close to a trillion dollars.
Josh:
As that trillion dollars is spent, it's going to trickle down the stack to a
Josh:
series of layers that are embedded within this AI ecosystem.
Josh:
So we're going to be detectives this episode and track down where all of that
Josh:
trillion dollars in CapEx is flowing.
Josh:
It's clearly leaving the large
Josh:
cap companies. Google is spending 90% of all the money that comes in.
Josh:
Where is it going? Well, we are going to walk you through everything.
Josh:
So hopefully by the end of this, you'll have a pretty good idea of the structure
Josh:
of what the AI investment universe looks like.
Josh:
And you can make up your own mind on where you think the best place is to allocate
Josh:
your dollars to collect the money that's flowing from these large cap companies.
Ejaaz:
Now, I've really had to ground myself over the last couple of weeks because
Ejaaz:
it felt like I'm in the land of make-believe.
Ejaaz:
Look at some of these stocks and how much they've increased over the past year.
Josh:
This is crazy.
Ejaaz:
This is absolutely insane. AMD is up three and a half X and 25% of that move
Ejaaz:
was literally over the last 12 hours, right?
Ejaaz:
Because they reported earnings, they crushed it. SanDisk is up 40%, as you mentioned.
Ejaaz:
ARM, Intel, all of these are in the infrastructure layer of AI,
Ejaaz:
which has become a very consensus trade.
Ejaaz:
And that's for many different reasons. And we're going to address that later on in the stack.
Ejaaz:
But there's one clear thing that changed over the last week.
Ejaaz:
And that came in the form of the major earnings reports for Q1 of 2026 from
Ejaaz:
four of the largest hyperscalers.
Ejaaz:
You've got Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Google. Now, there was a problem. There was an issue.
Ejaaz:
People thought that they were going to spend hundreds of billions of dollars.
Ejaaz:
And they originally committed to that being around $630 billion in 2026,
Ejaaz:
but no one knew how they were going to make money.
Ejaaz:
Q1 proved that them spending all that money not only resulted in more profit
Ejaaz:
and more revenue that they had generated, but also that they were going to revise this.
Ejaaz:
They were going to increase their spend in 2026 to a total of $800 billion,
Ejaaz:
with next year projecting $1.1 trillion.
Ejaaz:
This is just from four to five companies. I have to emphasize how nutty and crazy that is.
Ejaaz:
But again, this translates into actual revenue or money being earned.
Ejaaz:
I'm going to show you a few different stocks that kind of demonstrate or portray
Ejaaz:
that. So firstly, Sandisk.
Ejaaz:
40x over the last year. This is just like an astounding thing where like,
Ejaaz:
you know, a 40x return on any kind of major cap stock is just completely unheard of.
Ejaaz:
Then you have Intel that operates in the CPU kind of infrastructure packaging
Ejaaz:
layer of AI GPUs is up four and a half X. What else have we got? We've got AMD.
Ejaaz:
I mentioned that it's up 320% over the last year, but literally today it is
Ejaaz:
up 17%, absolutely crushing it.
Ejaaz:
And then we have Micron technology, which plays in the AI memory trade is up
Ejaaz:
7.25x over the last year.
Ejaaz:
And then there's this really cool investment vehicle where there's a bunch of
Ejaaz:
different AI memory trades.
Ejaaz:
You can get access to just a basket via this ETF, Roundhill Memory ETF,
Ejaaz:
something I participated in.
Ejaaz:
That only launched just over a month ago, Josh, and it is up 72%.
Ejaaz:
Just insane gains on these stocks.
Josh:
Do you have FOMO? Because I do. I'm feeling the FOMO. And I think the question
Josh:
and part of the concern that a lot of people are going to be feeling as they're
Josh:
seeing these numbers is like, oh, my God, did I miss this?
Josh:
It seems like very obviously we're in some sort of a bubble.
Josh:
But what stage of that bubble are we in?
Josh:
How should we deal with this? How should we navigate this? Well,
Josh:
Brad Gerstner, actually, Altimeter Capital investor, he's like a very prominent
Josh:
thought leader in the space.
Josh:
He went on CNBC yesterday to talk just about this, about where we are in the cycle.
Josh:
And his idea is that this time is different.
Josh:
And these are very famous words. We've heard this time is different a lot,
Josh:
but he explained why. And a lot of it comes from this capital expenditure.
Josh:
I mean, he just mentioned $800 billion is being spent this year.
Josh:
Over a trillion dollars is being spent next year. And a lot of that money is
Josh:
flowing from these large mega cap companies into infrastructure required to
Josh:
build out more AI use cases.
Josh:
As of now, these AI use cases are actually printing a good bit of money.
Josh:
I mean, it comes from that top where we see Anthropic and OpenAI printing billions
Josh:
of dollars of ARR per week. Google just became the most valuable company in the world.
Josh:
And it seems to be like we have this flywheel that is sustainable so long as AI is useful.
Josh:
And in the case that AI continues to be useful and we unlock new use cases that
Josh:
are more valuable than what they are today, then the amount of money people
Josh:
will pay for it will continue to go up.
Josh:
And those capital expenditures that are being priced into these earnings reports
Josh:
can then be priced into these further concentric circles out from the core.
Josh:
So if you'll notice, we didn't mention NVIDIA on one of these most valuable,
Josh:
like the largest gainer stocks, because they're kind of sitting at the top in
Josh:
which a lot of the capex is coming from.
Josh:
So what we're going to do now is kind of walk through the layers and the stack
Josh:
of where this money flows.
Josh:
So if you think about it, all of the money comes in through companies like Google,
Josh:
through companies like Amazon, who are collecting income from retail.
Josh:
Retail is spending on their goods and services.
Josh:
They're delivering a lot of value to them they take that money they redistribute
Josh:
it where is that going is the question we're going to answer so over the last
Josh:
few months we've seen this happen in semis a lot of those um
Josh:
A lot of those companies that you showed us, EJES, are semiconductor stocks. It's moving into CPUs.
Josh:
It's moving into GPUs. But let's start with the layer zero that we have here
Josh:
on the artifact, EJES. What's going on with the layer zero?
Josh:
What is at the base layer of this stack?
Ejaaz:
Okay, so you mentioned that four of the hyperscalers, Google,
Ejaaz:
Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon, are kind of taking inflows from retail.
Ejaaz:
There are currently two ways, or rather two startups and companies,
Ejaaz:
that funnel 99% of that retail. And they're called OpenAI and Anthropic.
Ejaaz:
They're both private companies. So you can't even access them publicly via equities
Ejaaz:
right now, but they contain the bulk of ChatGPT and Claude users, right?
Ejaaz:
So that in itself is kind of scary to kind of read, but the fact is they have
Ejaaz:
paying customers, they have paying enterprises, and that money is where the
Ejaaz:
fountain starts, the waterfall starts.
Ejaaz:
And from OpenAI and Anthropic, it flows down into what we're calling the layer
Ejaaz:
one, which is kind of like the platforms, hyperscalers, and also Model Labs,
Ejaaz:
Google counts itself as one as well.
Ejaaz:
Okay, so you've got Google, which doesn't actually just act as a Model Lab.
Ejaaz:
They have TPUs, they have the infrastructure, they have the distribution layer,
Ejaaz:
they have the cloud infrastructure, which is the main funneler of all this revenue
Ejaaz:
that they're making from their recent earnings.
Ejaaz:
You've got Amazon that's mentioned here as well, which is doing the same with AWS.
Ejaaz:
And you have Microsoft, which is doing the same through Azure.
Ejaaz:
Meta, who's doing the same from their social media platform.
Ejaaz:
And we've included opening an Anthropic here because some of them sometimes
Ejaaz:
play in the infrastructure layer.
Ejaaz:
So the first stack is, okay, we have OpenAI and Anthropic dealing with the retail.
Ejaaz:
That money and revenue flows into the hyperscalers that can provide compute
Ejaaz:
and distribute their models.
Ejaaz:
So very important. Google Cloud, AWS, and Microsoft Azure, all their cloud computing
Ejaaz:
services, distribute the model to all their enterprise customers and governments
Ejaaz:
and customers that actually want to, retail customers that actually want to
Ejaaz:
end up using these things.
Ejaaz:
And then, as you mentioned, Josh, we move into layer two, which is what we're
Ejaaz:
calling kind of the GPUs and semiconductor area, right? Now,
Ejaaz:
this is where the narrative breaks.
Ejaaz:
And classically, we have been told AI is going to do so well.
Ejaaz:
Demand is going to increase. Where's the best way to buy the picks and shovels?
Ejaaz:
Well, it's NVIDIA, of course, right? They're the most valuable company in the world, right, Josh?
Josh:
And that was correct. Yes, they were a $4 trillion company.
Josh:
As of today, that has changed. Google has taken the crown again.
Josh:
And I think it's because we're kind of reaching further out of this risk curve.
Josh:
The money is starting to propagate further out. So as it started,
Josh:
we needed to go from zero to one.
Josh:
We needed to go from no AI to AI. And what was required of that?
Josh:
Lots and lots of GPUs, lots and lots of intelligence. And that's where NVIDIA
Josh:
was most valuable because they were able to provide the GPUs to spin up the
Josh:
AI, to take the industry from zero to one.
Josh:
Now that we have AI, now that we have established business and revenue streams,
Josh:
that money is flowing to optimize the stack.
Josh:
So Jensen and NVIDIA are going to continue to make a tremendous amount of money,
Josh:
but that's kind of baked into the valuation and we've seen that run up.
Josh:
I mean, they're the second most valuable company in the world right now.
Josh:
It's a tremendous amount of market cap that they've absorbed over the last, call it 36 months.
Josh:
Now the time is come to cycle further
Josh:
out this risk curve to move beyond the picks and shovels into this
Josh:
next layer of the stack that even sits below gpu consumption and my understanding
Josh:
he does is it's not just gpus now there's also cpus and that has to do a lot
Josh:
with the the new agentic trend that we're seeing where agents are kind of being
Josh:
proactive and they need orchestrators and while gpus are really good at solving
Josh:
complex uh mathematical problems to produce inference
Josh:
You need smarts and you need brains in order to kind of orchestrate these models.
Josh:
And that's what's key about this next infrastructure layer that's going to really
Josh:
be a pretty big deal in the space.
Ejaaz:
That's exactly it. So I've got this article pulled up where Jensen went on a
Ejaaz:
stage right now and he talked about GPUs and the demand increasing ever so highly.
Ejaaz:
And he goes, consumption is going through the roof for GPUs with the rise of
Ejaaz:
agentic AI in the last several months. Now, I want to unpack this phrase very
Ejaaz:
specifically, because it explains why Intel and AMD are absolutely skyrocketing right now.
Ejaaz:
Agentic AI refers to AI agents. AI agents is kind of like, think of like an
Ejaaz:
instance of a ChatGPT or a Claude code that can just go off and do a bunch of
Ejaaz:
things autonomously for you.
Ejaaz:
So you don't have to type to it, you don't have to speak to it,
Ejaaz:
you don't have to prompt it.
Ejaaz:
It just goes off and works autonomously. Now, you can imagine the market for an AI autonomous worker
Ejaaz:
It's pretty large. The TAM is pretty huge. It's pretty much any sector that
Ejaaz:
involves a computer for now until robots actually become a thing.
Ejaaz:
But there's one kicker. This is the narrative violation, Josh.
Ejaaz:
Guess what you need to allow the AI agents to use the tools to go off and do that work?
Josh:
They need the brain. They need the CPU.
Ejaaz:
The CPU.
Josh:
Computer processing unit versus the graphical processing unit.
Ejaaz:
Right. So let me take you through a little historical context here.
Ejaaz:
Now, if we rewind to, let's take GPT 4.0, right? It was a breakthrough model. Everyone loved it.
Ejaaz:
Can you guess how many CPUs were used to train or inference that entire model?
Ejaaz:
Like, what's the ratio roughly? Do you think how many- CPUs or GPUs?
Ejaaz:
CPUs. So how many CPUs did you need for like the average GPU?
Ejaaz:
Like, what do you think that ratio was?
Josh:
I would guess close to zero.
Ejaaz:
Yeah, you would be correct. We barely even used it.
Ejaaz:
Fast forward to today, that ratio is almost one-to-one. Let me rephrase that. Let me reframe that.
Ejaaz:
You need one CPU core per GPU, and that trend is going to flip over the next
Ejaaz:
six months where the number of CPUs will outweigh GPUs.
Ejaaz:
So basically, Intel and AMD, who kind of built their bread and butter of profit
Ejaaz:
margins off of CPUs that were used for gaming and a bunch of other stuff,
Ejaaz:
now has found themselves in an absolute goldmine of an industry which requires
Ejaaz:
the things that they've been building for over decades.
Ejaaz:
So Intel and AMD are like, well, okay, I'll spin up as many CPUs as you want.
Ejaaz:
And Jensen's like, I need all these CPUs so I can spin up all these data racks.
Ejaaz:
Now, to help you understand why it is needed specifically, Josh,
Ejaaz:
you mentioned AI agent orchestration, right?
Ejaaz:
So let's say you spin up a bunch of AI agents. They need to,
Ejaaz:
guess what, interact with other AI agents. They also need to use tools.
Ejaaz:
And most importantly, they need to use these tools faster than humans can themselves.
Ejaaz:
Josh, on yesterday's episode, you mentioned what you loved about Codex specifically
Ejaaz:
was the browser use and the fact that it's so quick.
Ejaaz:
You love that. The reason why it's able to do that is because it has access to more CPUs.
Ejaaz:
It allows you to kind of run C compiler and a bunch of other things.
Ejaaz:
So the long story short is CPUs are in huge demand. And that's why Hymdi stock is up 15% today.
Ejaaz:
And it's probably going to be up what's up three and a half X over the last couple of years.
Ejaaz:
So they just reported their earnings. Intel did the same about two weeks ago.
Ejaaz:
And there's a huge demand for CPUs in general.
Josh:
And this is kind of the natural extension of the way that AI is moving.
Josh:
This hasn't always been the case, but we went from basically LLMs,
Josh:
right? Where we just used GPUs. It was a chatbot. You type into an interface.
Josh:
Then we went into reasoning and chain of thought where there was a lot more
Josh:
tokens needed in order to answer the same question.
Josh:
Then we moved into the agentic era where things like OpenClaw and the claw agentic
Josh:
swarm operating system came into play. And that's when this trend changed again.
Josh:
So assuming these trends are going to continue changing, the paradigms are going
Josh:
to continue to shift. But the one singular core truth throughout this is that
Josh:
we need more tokens. And no matter how we get them is up for debate,
Josh:
like how those are going to be generated.
Josh:
But the fact is that no matter what we do, every paradigm shift has resulted
Josh:
in a gigantic increase in more tokens, which seems like is a trend that you continue to bet on.
Josh:
And one person who bet on this pretty bigly was Donald Trump and the US government,
Josh:
like us, for the first time, like we're making money.
Josh:
Trump bought Intel and he's up what, 500% so far?
Ejaaz:
500 percent um so uh the government
Ejaaz:
uh about a year and a half ago
Ejaaz:
took a 10 stake in intel and
Ejaaz:
their primary reasoning for that was we have
Ejaaz:
too much reliance currently in the u.s on this one company called tsmc which
Ejaaz:
is based in taiwan which china presumably wants to take over at some point it's
Ejaaz:
too much of a geographical and national risk and so we wanted to kind of bring
Ejaaz:
a bunch of tsmc's capabilities on shore and that was expressed in the form of
Ejaaz:
intel who doesn't just build CPUs, by the way,
Ejaaz:
they're working on building a bunch of frontier GPUs. And that's a story for another day.
Ejaaz:
But the point is, Trump bought 10% via the government, and they are up 5x.
Josh:
You know what price you bought at $20.47? It's trading at $111 today is what
Josh:
the ticker is trading at.
Josh:
So shout out to the US government pumping our bags and winning on behalf of
Josh:
the people. That's very exciting.
Ejaaz:
Yeah. Okay, so let's continue down this waterfall. So what we've started off
Ejaaz:
with is Anthropic and OpenAI as the retail that flows down into the hyperscalers,
Ejaaz:
the Google, the Amazons, the cloud distributors, their revenue margins are expanding.
Ejaaz:
Okay, this is amazing, but they rely on semiconductors.
Ejaaz:
They need Jensen Huang's GPUs, but Jensen Huang needs all these CPUs because
Ejaaz:
all these AI agents are using all these different tools.
Ejaaz:
Okay, so we need CPUs. Now, can you guess? There's another component,
Ejaaz:
Josh, that makes up 50% of the bill of materials cost for a GPU. 50%.
Ejaaz:
Guess what it is?
Josh:
What does every single GPU on the planet need? Jensen, what does he need?
Josh:
What is his bottleneck choke point that doesn't work?
Josh:
Like the company doesn't work in the absence of it's memory.
Josh:
Memory is the biggest thing in the world. It's impossible to make enough memory. No one has it.
Josh:
And therefore any of the memory stocks that you have invested in,
Josh:
in the last year have gone absolutely nuclear.
Josh:
And these are probably among the biggest winners. When you think about SanDisk
Josh:
delivering a 40 times return, Micron is looking like a seven times return.
Josh:
Memory has been the choke point of all of these because memory is the most important thing.
Josh:
It's where we get our context windows from. It's where a lot of the training data is stored.
Josh:
Memory is the next layer of the stack.
Ejaaz:
Yes, exactly. And if you thought NVIDIA had a monopoly on GPUs,
Ejaaz:
let me introduce you to the secret monopoly of memory.
Ejaaz:
So there are basically four companies which dominate in the AI memory landscape.
Ejaaz:
Their names are Micron, which is a U.S.
Ejaaz:
Company, SK Hynix, which is, by the way, the biggest memory provider,
Ejaaz:
Korean company, Samsung, second biggest, and then we have SanDisk.
Ejaaz:
Now, you might assume that they all make the same types of memory. Three of them do.
Ejaaz:
Micron, SK Hynix, and Samsung make something called high-bandwidth memory.
Ejaaz:
This is the premium memory that goes into making the GPUs, the Rubin Ultras,
Ejaaz:
the fashionably new GPUs that NVIDIA releases every single year.
Ejaaz:
That incorporates 50% of it.
Ejaaz:
Our bill of materials is this fancy high bandwidth memory.
Ejaaz:
It is an extremely complex thing to make. The supply is super constrained and
Ejaaz:
only these three companies dominate in making it.
Ejaaz:
And that is for a different reason. I'll explain the memory cycle later on.
Ejaaz:
But then you have SanDisk, which is up 40%. And the reason why they're up 40%
Ejaaz:
is because there's a second type of memory which is required by these AI models.
Ejaaz:
And it's called NAND or N-A-N-D, NAND flash. Now, here's the difference between the two.
Ejaaz:
High bandwidth memory, which is the original GPU premium, basically allows you
Ejaaz:
to move data really quickly in the AI models.
Ejaaz:
Think about it, right? These AI models are like 10 trillion parameter large,
Ejaaz:
at least Mythos and GPT 5.5.
Ejaaz:
They need access to data very quickly, and it's clunky. It's very big.
Ejaaz:
High bandwidth memory basically solves that. It allows you to kind of store
Ejaaz:
the memory and like move that memory really quickly.
Ejaaz:
But there's the second type of memory, which SanDisk specializes in, called NAND.
Ejaaz:
And what that does is when you're having a conversation, Josh,
Ejaaz:
have you ever noticed that the models now are really good at maintaining the
Ejaaz:
context and remembering things
Ejaaz:
that you mentioned like a few sentences before? Have you noticed that?
Josh:
For a longer period of time, yes. The context windows have expanded quite a bit now.
Ejaaz:
Yes, exactly. Now, the main enabler for that is this NAND storage,
Ejaaz:
which is kind of like a temporary memory storage.
Ejaaz:
It's more of a commodity. It's not as sexy as high bandwidth memory,
Ejaaz:
but it's super important.
Ejaaz:
SanDisk dominates that entire sector, which is why it's up 40X.
Ejaaz:
So memory has famously gone under a huge supply constraint.
Ejaaz:
These providers are sold out, and I'm not exaggerating this, until the end of 2028.
Ejaaz:
They have signed customer contracts until the end of 2028.
Ejaaz:
They don't have enough memory, they don't have enough supply,
Ejaaz:
and so ramping that up is going to be the key focus over the next couple of years.
Josh:
And this has been really felt in the retail market as well. If you use memory
Josh:
for traditional use cases, like building PCs or just general consumer products,
Josh:
all of those have either been delayed or the prices increased because it is
Josh:
so difficult to get your hands on this memory.
Josh:
And when you think about this memory, there's a pretty simple analogy that I
Josh:
was using earlier today when it came to describing and understanding how this works.
Josh:
So high bandwidth memory, like you mentioned, it's known as HBM for short.
Josh:
It's basically a series of DRAM stacks stacked on top of each other.
Josh:
And you can think of those as this like this huge desk right next to the AI
Josh:
model that they can very quickly reference.
Josh:
And then the NAND is the file cabinet that's kind of right next to it that is
Josh:
more persistent that holds these ideas for a longer period of time it's larger
Josh:
but it is a bit slower and the dynamic between the two is really interesting
Josh:
now one of the things that was
Josh:
kind of a narrative violation as i was reading about it is the idea that
Josh:
Deep Seek can actually create more efficient models in terms of how much they
Josh:
use memory, and yet the demand for memory goes up.
Josh:
So Deep Seek, they published this famous paper that allowed them to get basically
Josh:
frontier level intelligence using a small fraction of the amount of memory that
Josh:
traditional AI labs have used. This seems like a bad thing.
Josh:
We need less memory because we've become more efficient, but the reality is,
Josh:
is that the inverse actually happened, where now we have greater memory efficiency,
Josh:
but far greater memory demand.
Josh:
So maybe you could explain this dynamic that's happened with this,
Josh:
because there's a strange deep seek paradox going on that I think is a narrative
Josh:
violation in which people kind of look for when seeing things that can pop this bubble.
Josh:
And the reality is, is that this is this is not even a little small tear in the bubble.
Josh:
It's actually improving the quality of the money spent. How is this working
Josh:
with this memory dynamic here?
Ejaaz:
Yeah, it's basically Jevin's paradox. So the problem that you're explaining
Ejaaz:
is if 50 percent of this GPU thing is reliant on this one component supplied
Ejaaz:
by four different companies, they have to work on a workaround, right?
Ejaaz:
They're probably going to create GPUs or models that don't rely high on memory.
Ejaaz:
And Deep Seek version 4, which was released a few weeks ago,
Ejaaz:
was the instantiation of that.
Ejaaz:
It uses, I think, like 5% to 15% of a Claude Opus 4.7 model,
Ejaaz:
which is a drastic reduction, which may lead you to think that memory stocks
Ejaaz:
are going to crumble, except the actual opposite happened.
Ejaaz:
So I've got this block of text here, but I'm going to explain it in very simple terms.
Ejaaz:
What they found was the architecture unlock that DeepSeq v4 created actually
Ejaaz:
ended up using more of that NAND flash memory because their architecture change
Ejaaz:
was, we'll just use more agents.
Ejaaz:
We'll let more agents do the thinking before we give someone an answer to their prompt.
Ejaaz:
And it resulted in a smarter effort. But that didn't decrease the reliance on
Ejaaz:
HBM or memory in general.
Ejaaz:
Increased it overall. You'll see here that each prompt required 157 rounds and
Ejaaz:
a bunch of token contacts, all of that interfacing with these memory components.
Ejaaz:
So the actual opposite happened. And this is Jeven's paradox playing out in
Ejaaz:
reality, where if you assume that the demand for goods, or rather the cost of
Ejaaz:
goods goes down, you'll assume demand goes down because it's like cheaper,
Ejaaz:
you don't make as much money.
Ejaaz:
But the in fact, opposite happens where demand goes way higher,
Ejaaz:
because now you can do more things for cheaper. So Jevon's paradox playing out here.
Josh:
Okay, next layer of the stack, power generation and infrastructure.
Josh:
How are we going to plug in these GPUs? Well, we need infra for it.
Josh:
Otherwise, they're just going to be sitting there dark with no power and no
Josh:
ability to turn them on. This is layer five of the stack.
Josh:
This is where you will recognize names, perhaps like Bloom Energy,
Josh:
which we have famously mentioned.
Josh:
Our boy Leopold is up like what, four or five times return on Bloom Energy.
Ejaaz:
Yeah, like two bills.
Josh:
Yeah, like doing pretty well. And this is the part of the stack that is,
Josh:
I guess, core and sits a little bit downstream of the GPUs. But again,
Josh:
contingent on it working.
Josh:
Tell me a little bit about this company, particularly, I mean,
Josh:
Corning. We had a deal with Corning Opio today and NVIDIA, which is pretty big.
Josh:
I would imagine most people listening to this have never even heard of Corning before.
Ejaaz:
Yes, exactly. So I have to be upfront. This is where I'm weakest in this stack or this.
Ejaaz:
So I have to be upfront and maybe we'll do an episode later down when we've
Ejaaz:
done a bit of research. But basically, if you look at the stack so far,
Ejaaz:
it flows down from retail, it goes through semiconductors, it goes through CPUs,
Ejaaz:
and it goes through memory.
Ejaaz:
Where does the puck flow next? Well, there's an issue.
Ejaaz:
I buy all these GPUs, I buy all these CPUs, I set them all up neatly in a warehouse,
Ejaaz:
in a stack, in a server rack.
Ejaaz:
But I don't have enough power to power the thing. Or if I do have the power,
Ejaaz:
I don't know how to regulate the power to the right GPUs and the right CPUs
Ejaaz:
at the right time to prevent a blackout, but not overheat it.
Ejaaz:
And then I have a cooling system.
Ejaaz:
There's a whole architecture around the GPUs and the CPUs operating at optimal form.
Ejaaz:
There was an article that was released by The Information this week,
Ejaaz:
which showed that XAI, which has the largest cluster of GPUs,
Ejaaz:
over a million high-grade NVIDIA GPUs, only utilize 11% of its power.
Ejaaz:
That's because they don't have enough power generation or the chips or the architecture
Ejaaz:
to allow this power to flow directly through GPUs.
Ejaaz:
I think this is where the puck is flowing next.
Ejaaz:
And today's announcement, where NVIDIA is partnering with Glassmaker Corning,
Ejaaz:
which is focused on optics specifically, is part of that puzzle.
Ejaaz:
But there's also another piece, which
Ejaaz:
is basically the power suppliers or infrastructure providers on its own,
Ejaaz:
mainly referenced by companies like GE, Vinova, CEG, Constellation Energy,
Ejaaz:
which we had on our stack just now,
Ejaaz:
which not only supply the power and make sure the power ends up at the data
Ejaaz:
center, but also regulates and makes sure that the power enters at the right
Ejaaz:
time to the CPUs, to the GPUs, to make sure they're optimally performing.
Josh:
And this is layer five of the six-layer stack, the sixth and final layer being the raw materials.
Josh:
Now, this is kind of the bare-bones foundational layer. When you think about
Josh:
The AI stack from first principles, what is required at that foundation,
Josh:
it is the raw materials in to get the intelligence out.
Josh:
We've turned sand and silicon into thought.
Josh:
And throughout that entire process, there is a tremendous amount of technology empowering it.
Josh:
Now, we are not proficient currently in materials, but if you would like us
Josh:
to be, and if this is an episode of interest, we can go deeper on layer five
Josh:
and layer six of the stack.
Josh:
Because I was looking at a chart this morning from of lithium carbonate,
Josh:
which is just a very critical component to a lot of the AI stack.
Josh:
I'm looking at a chart from November where it was priced at $75,000,
Josh:
and now it is at $187,000.
Josh:
So the gain and return on some of these materials has been just unbelievable.
Josh:
And this is the sixth and final layer of the stack. So perhaps in a future episode,
Josh:
but hopefully this has given you kind of a loose orientation of how you could
Josh:
think about the trickle down economics of AI, how it kind of starts from this
Josh:
layer zero and works its way through the infrastructure.
Josh:
Now, EJs, we have to kind of orient ourselves in reality.
Josh:
Good things don't last forever and there's
Josh:
a high probability that this one doesn't perhaps this time
Josh:
is different but there is a case to be made that it is not because
Josh:
traditionally memory has done well in the past there
Josh:
have been a series of memory booms that have done very well every single one
Josh:
of which has followed up with a bust so where would you say we are currently
Josh:
um in the cycle or at least what are the downsides that people should be looking
Josh:
out for and aware of that would let them know that hey maybe things are looking a little frothy here
Josh:
there's some cause for concern.
Ejaaz:
Yeah, so the first factor is the boom and bust cycles, particularly with memory,
Ejaaz:
which I think is, what was it, layer three, layer four of the sec that we just described.
Ejaaz:
It has traditionally gone through many boom and bust cycles,
Ejaaz:
which I'm showing on our screen here through this chart.
Ejaaz:
Now, what isn't represented here is.
Ejaaz:
At the start, on the left-hand side of this chart, we had 14 key memory providers.
Ejaaz:
Fast forward to today, and we have three for high bandwidth memory and one for NAD.
Ejaaz:
So four. And the reason why is every single boom and mainly the bust has crushed
Ejaaz:
out specific companies to leave like the three that we have right now.
Ejaaz:
And so history would tell us that the same thing is going to happen this time.
Ejaaz:
Now, I'm conflicted here, Josh, because I'm sitting here as a podcaster and
Ejaaz:
saying this, but I listened to three podcast episodes from the memory execs
Ejaaz:
from all of these different companies yesterday.
Ejaaz:
Guess what they said? They said, this time is different. They said,
Ejaaz:
this time is a very unique opportunity because not only is AI surging demand
Ejaaz:
for all of these memory chips and they've got payments for all of these things,
Ejaaz:
on the front end, the AI products themselves are being paid for.
Ejaaz:
They're actually making money. Now, the definition of a bubble is it's levered.
Ejaaz:
It's a bunch of hoopla, right? There isn't actually any money coming in.
Ejaaz:
This disproves that narrative, the bubble narrative, because there's money being
Ejaaz:
paid off. None of these companies are levered up.
Ejaaz:
That 800 billion CapEx number that we started this episode with is all coming
Ejaaz:
from cash flows that they have right now or cash reserves that they have right
Ejaaz:
now. No one is levered up. No one's borrowing money for this.
Josh:
Yeah, in 2026 and 2027, I mean, that's $2 trillion of guidance that comes from cash flow.
Josh:
It comes from Google spending 90% of the money they actually make.
Josh:
So there isn't leverage. This is somewhat sustainable.
Josh:
And now that we have the rough CapEx guidance, people can kind of price in what
Josh:
this will look like when it impacts the market.
Josh:
And that is the current layout of the land.
Josh:
This is everything you need to know about the full AI stack,
Josh:
what has been doing well, what hasn't.
Josh:
And I guess the question for you is now that you're oriented or whoever is listening
Josh:
is what part of the stack are you most interested specifically what companies
Josh:
are most interesting because there is this gigantic hot ball of money that is
Josh:
moving its way through the market for the first time in a very long time.
Josh:
This is a paradigm shift for the last decade or two.
Josh:
All of the money has kind of accumulated at the top of these funnels has accumulated
Josh:
to Google to Amazon to these large mega cap companies, but now it's working its way out.
Josh:
And where is that money going to end up? It is TBD. We've seen semiconductors.
Josh:
We've seen memory do really well will they continue tbd where
Josh:
else is the money flowing to we're not sure but the goal
Josh:
of this episode is just orientation right you kind of now have a lay of the
Josh:
land you have an idea of where everything is and can maybe go out and pick some
Josh:
winners so i guess the prompt for this episode is who are the winners who's
Josh:
going to win this um battle of capex accumulation is is what i would love to
Josh:
know because i will plan and allocate my portfolio accordingly
Ejaaz:
Yep, same here. My bags is the answer, Josh.
Ejaaz:
But right now, I think that we are kind of in a bubble, but it's a different
Ejaaz:
type of bubble than what we're used to because no one's levered up,
Ejaaz:
as I mentioned earlier on.
Ejaaz:
And it remains to be seen. Like every quarterly earnings, I'm going to evaluate
Ejaaz:
everyone's spec sheet and see if they're actually making money from this thing.
Ejaaz:
Q1 earnings, which released over the last two weeks, tells us that it is.
Ejaaz:
And listen, there are always levered bets everywhere.
Ejaaz:
Like if you don't buy any of the companies that we You mentioned there are smaller
Ejaaz:
cap stocks that you might go after.
Ejaaz:
They are high risk with all of these different types of investments and the
Ejaaz:
narrative can change, as we know, in AI in a second.
Ejaaz:
So the long story short is, neither of us know, but we will be keeping track
Ejaaz:
of everything and we'll be updating you.
Ejaaz:
Josh's prompt earlier on is genuine for me as well.
Ejaaz:
If you want to hear more about lower layers of the stack, we will do the research
Ejaaz:
and we'll deliver you that episode.
Ejaaz:
Let us know in the comments and let us know what stocks you're investing.
Ejaaz:
But aside from that, Josh, I think we're done.
Josh:
That's it. Thank you guys so much for watching. As always, share it with your
Josh:
friends who might be interested in an episode like this, and we will see you guys in the next one.
Ejaaz:
See you guys.