TCW Investment Perspectives

Dave Vick hosts Michael Reilly, Bryan Whalen, and Penny Foley for a roundtable discussion on the global financial impacts of the 2024 U.S. elections on Equities, Fixed Income, and Emerging Markets. 

Creators and Guests

DV
Host
David Vick
BW
Guest
Bryan Whalen
MR
Guest
Michael Reilly
PF
Guest
Penny Foley

What is TCW Investment Perspectives?

TCW is a leading global asset management firm with over 50 years of investment experience and a broad range of products across fixed income, equities, emerging markets, and alternative investments. In each episode of TCW Investment Perspectives, professionals from the firm share their insights on global trends and events impacting markets and the investment landscape.

Election boards around the United States have been busy counting
ballots, and it looks like betting markets got it right

Trump rode the red wave to victory, with the GOP taking
control of the Senate, and potentially the House as well

The knee-jerk reaction to the outcome was swift and substantial

Despite the near-term volatility, TCW is intent on looking through the noise

Economic outcomes take time, and policy can take even longer

And at the end of the day, markets are driven by data

Welcome to TCW Investment Perspectives Podcast, where we have gathered leaders

from our fixed income, equities, and emerging markets team to discuss the

election results and how those results will affect the markets going forward

I'm David Vick, and joining me today is our CIO of fixed income,

Brian Whalen, our CIO of equities, Michael Reilly, and the

founder and co-head of our emerging markets group, Penny Foley

Thank you all for joining me on what is a very busy day

Obviously, market reaction has been dramatic

But how much of this is sustainable, and what
are the longer-term outcomes likely to be?

The fact is that matter will be different for different sectors

So, Michael, let's start with you on the equity front

What's happening now, and what's this mean for your markets looking forward?

Sure

Thanks, David

Well, obviously, stocks are rallying quite sharply

The market's not just pricing in Trump victory, but rather a
Republican sweep, even though the House outcome hasn't been called

That's important for the equity market because of the

implication of potential tax cuts, not just the extension of

the Trump tax cuts, but perhaps further corporate tax cuts

And of course, that's good for earnings

I think, in general, what else is equity market-friendly

would be things like reduced regulatory burden, particularly

in the financial sector and the energy sector as well

This is likely to spur M&A with less interference
with perhaps the exception of big tech

There's still questions there

And then I would also say that domestic-oriented
manufacturing is likely to be favoured

But there are also losers today as well

And I'd point out clean energy is getting severely hurt

Companies with operations abroad or strong overseas
revenue bases hurt by the prospect of tariffs

Brian, how about the fixed income markets?

Actually, I'll build off what the tone that Michael was setting

I think it said it well, whether you're looking at the equity markets, the rest

of the fixed income markets or any market side, which is like right now, I think

the question and where our belief is that the election results, and let's just

assume it's the red wave, it's going to be more at least in the near term

about the micro level, like the bottoms up, meaning I think what would

be tangible is to Michael's point, there'll be winners and losers

There'll be sectors that win, there'll be sectors that lose, there'll be

companies that win, there'll be companies that lose, there'll be parts of

the consumer segment that win, and there potentially could be some that lose

So the bigger question for us and the bigger moves in
the market are more about the macro level, the top down

And the question is, does this shift in the political landscape, can it
overcome and overwhelm and change the economic or the business cycle?

Like, that's the big question we have to answer

And the market moves based upon that we're seeing today, it really feels

more like not only is the market pricing in that the Republicans are going

to get everything they want to the extreme nature that they want, but

they're also going to get it done in a very short order of magnitude

And if you look back over history, many, many presidents, recent ones in

particular, have come into office with a lot of hope and a lot of change and a

lot of momentum only to within the first 12 months of being in office to find

out that they can't effectively outrun the business cycle or a

change in the credit markets and they have to deal with a bump

And that when we look at the markets today and we're looking at credit spreads,

risk compensation in the corporate bond market, we look at yields rising,

it doesn't seem like risk is appropriately priced for anything other

than this big economic boom based upon regulatory changes or tax cuts

Great

Thanks, Brian

Penny, how about what's happening in EM?

EM is a very large asset class, 70 countries plus, and it's
characterized by both external debt and local currency debt

So there are a lot of different losers and a lot of different winners

I think the initial reaction in local EM markets was to price in

renewed US exceptionalism as Brian suggested, better relative

growth, slower pace of Fed easing, no questions asked

And that's resulted in a stronger dollar, particularly
against low yielders in Asia and in Europe

Mexico, which is a perceived big loser from the Trump

trade, was off close to about three and a half percent

overnight, but it's retraced almost entirely this morning

Brazil and Turkey are actually rallied on the news

So again, very different reactions

I think that said, increased uncertainty and volatility
is always a problem in the near term for EMFX

It's always going to be a headwind

And so in that environment, you know, we continue to like

high yielding idiosyncratic local markets where we've been

involved really pretty much this year, like Egypt and Turkey

Also, relative value trades with longs in countries with attractive
fundamentals and likely to be less impacted by Trump trade policies

That's India, Indonesia and even South Africa against
shorts in places like China, Thailand and Mexico

You know, in the hard currency EM markets, high yield sovereigns

are outperforming today, effectively flat on the day in total

return terms, which reflect better growth prospects in the US

benefit them and also lower duration versus the benchmark

Countries that are perceived to benefit from Trump policies, such as
Ukraine, Argentina and El Salva are actually up one to two points on the day

You know, EM investment grade sovereigns are down,
really, you know, reflecting the sell off in US

treasuries with spreads tightening by about 10 bips

Corporates are outperforming sovereigns

They're stronger credit fundamentals and shorter duration

We are long, 12 percent long, high yield sovereigns which are benefiting today

And we are also benefiting from a 20 percent off index allocation to corporate

So again, it's it's over, you know, a number of different
impacts depending on country, depending on how open economy

Great

Thanks, Penny

So maybe a question for for the group

Does the election results, does it change sort of the
fundamental outlooks to change where we see value in markets?

Or is this just sort of a temporary blip that will kind
of that won't change the trajectory of the economy?

Maybe I'll start there

I'll start with interest rates and then Penny and Michael can build off that

I would say

As we've been in this higher interest rate environment now, as the Fed
raised rates throughout, you know, 2022 in particular, the last time

Well, the first time the credit markets wobbled because of
interest rates, it was in the fall of twenty three and the US

10 year was basically around 5 percent

And the credit markets interpreted that as something
at a rate that the economy couldn't handle

And you saw start to see some volatility and rates came back down

And then we saw rates go back up again in the spring of this year

And they peaked out in April around four point seven five percent 10 year

You're seeing a trend here

And the credit markets started to wobble again and they came back down again

Now we're in this new environment where the Fed is starting to cut

They're most likely going to cut at their next meeting

And we're almost at four point five percent on the 10 year

And credit markets and equity markets are doing anything but wobble

And I think that's an interesting kind of point to make

And a question investors have to ask themselves, I guess, things materially

change where like there's all of a sudden this economy, is it something

that can handle between four and a half and five percent interest rates?

We would contend that's not the case

And that should kind of factor into your decision making

Yeah

And I would add to that, you know, it is an open question

How healthy is the labor market?

We've seen the lower end consumer really struggle

Companies are telling us that

And so, of course, this election doesn't change that in the near term

So we have to see what the health really is of the job market

And also this whole notion of tariffs and the incidence of tariffs

and how much is bluster and how much actually gets, you know,

applied does matter to individual stocks and to the equity market

And we have to see how much is inflationary, how much isn't,
what does it do to growth and the growth profile for the economy

So there's some some big open questions out there, to be sure

And Penny, from the EM side, what are some
of the longer term things you're looking at?

What are some of the factors, you know, outside the election

that you think are going to be important in context of the

election, but moving forward from here in emerging markets?

Yeah, I think the potential tariff war obviously has impact on certain
countries beneficially and a significantly negative impact on others

So, you know, certain EM countries will stand to benefit
if China starts to move imports away from the US

So, for example, in 2016, Trump 10, agricultural
imports into China were moved from the US

to Brazil

So benefiting EM, that can happen

There are also certain countries that will benefit from a diversification

of supply chains away from China, although I think it's likely that the

Trump administration are going to be super vigilant about backdoor trade

So don't get that excited about that

In terms of China's stimulus, you know, I think obviously fears of increased US

tariffs will be a persistent headwind for the CNY

But the magnitude, I think in the short term, and you can
see that today, will be tempered by the PBOC intervention

The outlook for weaker US-China trade relations could also impact the

extent of the China stimulus package we expect to see in the next

couple of days, which could offset these impacts to some extent

I think longer term, one needs to watch the US

dynamics

Obviously, US

equities are rallying on better growth prospects today, but it's unclear

if this move will be sustained given the potential impact of deportations

and secondary effects of tariffs on prices and consumer demand

I think those are clearly concerns for 2025
that have to be, you know, have to be monitored

You know, let's maybe pull the conversation back to the US

here, but on a point that Penny was making with regard to tariffs, and I'll kind

of link that to my comments on interest rates, I think right now, you know, the

market's kind of running with the idea that not only higher debt issuance, which

should push up interest rates, but also higher kind of inflation,

at least in the medium term, a lot of it linked to the tariff

And what we think about is, first of all, the first time Trump 10,

you know, the tariffs implemented then, first of all, it took a

long time to implement and they did not lead to higher inflation

Actually, we saw lower inflation

And this is an individual who negotiates very aggressively and he starts

at the extreme and then he settles anywhere he can, which usually

somewhere in the middle or something, quote unquote, reasonable

So when we think about the tariffs, we're, you know,
we're not dismissing, but definitely a grain of salt

We're taking the idea of 60% tariffs on
China and 10 to 15% on the rest of the world

And we say, you know what, like it's going to be something lower than that

And let's remember, we're a service oriented economy

These tariffs are on goods and they're not on all the goods

They're on some of the goods

And also, regardless of how much gets pushed
through, someone has to pay for that, obviously

But in an economy, if it is weak and the job market continues to weaken,
it probably won't be the consumer paying those taxes through higher prices

It's probably going to be companies absorbing
that through our currently pretty healthy margins

And that actually pulls down on growth and
potentially could actually pull down on inflation

So we're definitely not in the camp that whatever tariffs get

put in place beyond what's currently in place are going to

automatically lead to higher inflation and higher interest rates

All right

Thanks very much, everyone, for your insights

We appreciate your time today

Thanks, everybody, for joining us on TCW's Investment Perspectives podcast

For more information on TCW strategies, please visit our website at tcwcom

Thanks for listening

We'll pick up next time exploring the trends
and opportunities shaping global markets

Thanks, everyone, for joining us on TCW's Investment Perspectives podcast

We'll pick up next time exploring the trends
and opportunities shaping global markets

Thanks, everyone, for joining us on TCW's Investment Perspectives podcast

We'll pick up next time exploring the trends
and opportunities shaping global markets

Thanks, everyone, for joining us on TCW's Investment Perspectives podcast

We'll pick up next time exploring the trends