Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Truth Seekers: Where Data Meets Reality
Tired of sensational headlines and conflicting health advice? Join Alex Barrett and Bill Morrison as they cut through the noise to uncover what scientific research actually says about the claims flooding your social media feed.
Each week, Alex and Bill tackle a different health, nutrition, or wellness claim that everyone's talking about. From "blue light ruins your sleep" to "seed oils are toxic," they dig into the actual studies, examine the methodologies, and translate the data into plain English.
No agenda. No sponsors to please. No credentials to fake. Just two people committed to finding out what's really true by going straight to the source—the research itself.
Perfect for anyone who's skeptical of influencer health advice but doesn't have time to read every scientific study themselves. New episodes drop regularly, delivering clarity in a world full of clickbait.
Question everything. Verify with data. Find the truth.
Disclaimer: Truth Seekers provides educational content based on published research. Nothing in this podcast should be considered medical, financial, or professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals for decisions affecting your health and wellbeing.
Before we begin, a quick note. The opinions and analysis shared on truth seekers are our own interpretations of published research and should not be used as medical, financial, or professional advice. Always consult qualified professionals for decisions affecting your health or well-being.
Speaker 2:And with that out of the way, welcome to Truth Seekers. I'm Bill Morrison.
Speaker 1:And I'm Alex Barrett. Today is 11/10/2025, and we're talking about the cold hard truth about ice baths.
Speaker 2:Let's get to the truth.
Speaker 1:Right. So, apparently, I've been doing wellness all wrong because I'm not dunking myself in ice water every morning.
Speaker 2:Yeah. My social media feed is basically just shirtless people sitting in chest freezers now, claiming it's curing everything from anxiety to heart disease.
Speaker 1:And it's not just randos. There's this massive commercial boom. I was looking at the numbers, and ice bath sales went from under a thousand units a month in late twenty twenty two to over 90,000 units a month by the 2023.
Speaker 2:90,000. That's a $338,000,000 market. When money gets that big, I start wondering what the actual evidence looks like.
Speaker 1:Exactly. Because the claims are everywhere. Improves cardiovascular health, boosts immunity, fixes your mental health, and people swear by it. They genuinely feel different after doing it.
Speaker 2:Right. And that's the tricky part. I don't doubt people feel something. The question is whether what they're feeling is what they think is happening.
Speaker 1:So what does the science actually show? Because there's got to be research on this by now.
Speaker 2:There is, and it just got a lot more definitive. A meta analysis came out in January 2025 in PLOS ONE, eleven randomized controlled trials over 3,000 participants. This is the most comprehensive look we've gotten at cold water immersion for the general population.
Speaker 1:And?
Speaker 2:And it's fascinating because some of what people claim is sort of true, but the timeline is completely wrong. And then there's this one finding that basically contradicts the entire wellness narrative.
Speaker 1:Go on.
Speaker 2:Cold water immersion causes an acute inflammatory spike. Immediately after you get out and one hour later, inflammation markers in your blood are significantly elevated.
Speaker 1:Hang on. Inflammation goes up.
Speaker 2:Up. The meta analysis found a standardized mean difference of 1.03 immediately after and 1.2 six one hour post immersion, both statistically significant.
Speaker 1:But the entire pitch from influencers is that ice baths reduce inflammation. That's like the foundational claim.
Speaker 2:I know. And the data shows the opposite. Your body treats cold water immersion as a stressor, and it responds with an inflammatory reaction.
Speaker 1:That's quite a problem for the marketing, isn't it?
Speaker 2:It really is. And it gets weirder when you look at stress reduction, which people do experience, but not when they think they do.
Speaker 1:What do you mean?
Speaker 2:The meta analysis measured stress biomarkers at multiple time points. Immediately after cold immersion, one hour later, twelve hours, twenty four hours, forty eight hours. Guess when they found a significant reduction in stress.
Speaker 1:Immediately after, I'd assume. That's when people say they feel amazing.
Speaker 2:Nope. No significant effect immediately. No significant effect at one hour. The stress reduction shows up at twelve hours post immersion.
Speaker 1:Twelve hours later?
Speaker 2:Twelve hours later. And then it's gone. No significant effects at twenty four or forty eight hours. So you've got this very narrow window where stress markers actually drop. And it's half a day after you did the thing.
Speaker 1:So when people finish an ice bath and say they feel incredible right away, that's not stress reduction they're experiencing.
Speaker 2:Not according to the biomarkers. No. It might be adrenaline or the relief of getting out of freezing water or placebo, but it's not the stress reduction that shows up in the data.
Speaker 1:This feels like one of those situations where what people experience and what's actually happening in their bodies are two completely different things.
Speaker 2:That's exactly it. And mood is even more disconnected from the claims.
Speaker 1:I was going to ask about that. Mental health benefits are huge in the marketing.
Speaker 2:The meta analysis only found one randomized controlled trial that directly measured mood. And it found no significant differences between people who did cold water immersion and people who didn't.
Speaker 1:No difference at all?
Speaker 2:No significant difference. Now, was one non randomized study that reported mood benefits. But when you actually do a controlled trial where people don't know whether the intervention is supposed to help them or not, the effect disappears.
Speaker 1:So that's inflammation, stress, and mood, all either contradicting the claims or showing effects at completely different times than advertised. What about immunity? That's another massive claim.
Speaker 2:Immunity got a grade D evidence rating in the meta analysis. That means inconclusive contradictory findings. There was no significant immune effect immediately after or one hour after cold immersion.
Speaker 1:So basically, we've got a $338,000,000 industry built on benefits that either don't exist, happen at weird times no one's talking about, or directly contradict what's being sold.
Speaker 2:And here's the thing that really bothers me from a data perspective. Most of these studies measured single sessions. Just one fifteen minute dunk, measure some biomarkers, done.
Speaker 1:But people aren't buying ice baths for one session. They're buying them as a lifestyle change.
Speaker 2:Right. And the few studies that did look at repeated use over time found that quality of life improvements, which were modest to begin with, completely disappeared by day 90.
Speaker 1:They disappeared?
Speaker 2:Gone. Not significant anymore. So even the benefits that did show up in the data don't last.
Speaker 1:Okay. But I want to push back for a second because people really do feel different after cold plunges. I've had friends rave about it. Are we saying that's all in their heads?
Speaker 2:No. I think something is happening. Your heart rate does drop temporarily. Blood pressure goes down for a few hours. Cortisol, which is a stress hormone, decreases briefly.
Speaker 2:These are real measurable changes.
Speaker 1:So what's the problem?
Speaker 2:The problem is that temporary biomarker changes aren't the same thing as health improvement. Your heart rate dropping from 70 beats per minute to 55 for three hours doesn't mean you've improved your cardiovascular health. It means your body had an acute physiological response.
Speaker 1:It's like saying you've improved your fitness because your heart rate goes up when you climb stairs.
Speaker 2:Exactly. That's a response, not an adaptation. And this is where the confusion happens. People feel the acute response. They see their heart rate drop on their smartwatch or whatever, and they interpret that as their cardiovascular system getting stronger.
Speaker 1:But it's not.
Speaker 2:There's no evidence it is. A sports cardiologist at Harvard affiliated Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center said he's pretty cautious about recommending cold water therapy because the reasons people do it can be much better served with other interventions like exercise.
Speaker 1:Which actually does improve cardiovascular health long term.
Speaker 2:Right. And here's where this stops being just a misleading wellness trend and becomes actually concerning. The cardiac risks are almost completely absent from influencer messaging. What risks? Cold water immersion triggers something called the cold shock response.
Speaker 2:Your body suddenly hits freezing water and your sympathetic nervous system goes into overdrive. Heart rate spikes, blood pressure shoots up, breathing becomes gasping and uncontrolled.
Speaker 1:That sounds not great for your heart.
Speaker 2:It's not, especially if you have an undiagnosed heart condition. Blood vessels constrict to conserve heat, which forces more blood to your chest and taxes your heart. In people with arrhythmia risks or underlying cardiac issues they don't know about, this can trigger dangerous heart rhythms.
Speaker 1:How dangerous are we talking?
Speaker 2:There are documented cases of sudden cardiac death from cold water immersion. And more recently, researchers reported a case of a young, apparently healthy man who collapsed after ten minutes in an ice bath at a commercial venue in Sydney.
Speaker 1:Doctor. Christ. And none of this is in the Instagram posts.
Speaker 2:Doctor. None of it. The Harvard cardiologist specifically said anyone with a heart rhythm disorder like atrial fibrillation should avoid cold plunges entirely. Same with people who have circulation problems. But the influencer message is push through the discomfort and it's supposed to be hard.
Speaker 1:Which could actually be your body telling you to get out because something's going wrong.
Speaker 2:Exactly. And here's the other thing. Most of the research was done on young, healthy, mostly male college students. Fifty five percent of the participants in this meta analysis came from just one study. Most other studies were 100% male.
Speaker 1:So we don't actually know how this affects women or older adults or people with health conditions?
Speaker 2:We don't. And those are exactly the populations where cardiac risks would be highest.
Speaker 1:This feels very familiar, a wellness trend that sounds science backed, makes people feel something immediately, and then when you actually look at the research, its temporary effects being sold as lasting transformation.
Speaker 2:What gets me is that the researchers themselves are really clear about this. The meta analysis conclusion literally says the benefits remain unsubstantiated, and notes concerning findings of short term increases in inflammation. They say more research is needed before cold water immersion can be widely recommended.
Speaker 1:But it's already being widely recommended. That's the entire problem.
Speaker 2:That's the entire problem. When I was working in tech, we'd use data to persuade rather than inform all the time. Find the number that supported the story you wanted to tell. And that's exactly what's happening here. Influencers are taking the numbers that sound good, heart rate dropped, cortisol decreased, and ignoring the timeline, the inflammation spike, the lack of long term data, and the cardiac risks.
Speaker 1:So what should people actually take away from this?
Speaker 2:If you've done cold plunges and felt good, I'm not saying that feeling wasn't real. But understand it's an acute physiological response, not a health improvement. Your body is reacting to stress and then recovering. That's not the same as building cardiovascular fitness or strengthening your immune system.
Speaker 1:And the things being sold as immediate benefits, stress relief, mood boost, either aren't showing up in controlled studies or they're happening twelve hours later when you're not even thinking about the ice bath anymore.
Speaker 2:Right. And if you have any heart issues, circulation problems, or you're not a young healthy adult who's been screened for cardiac conditions, talk to an actual doctor before trying this. Not an influencer, not a wellness coach, a cardiologist.
Speaker 1:Because the difference between an acute stress response your body can handle and one that triggers a dangerous arrhythmia might not be obvious until it's too late.
Speaker 2:And that's the part that really bothers me. The research exists. The warnings are there, but they're being drowned out by marketing that prioritizes feeling over evidence.
Speaker 1:Classic case of temporary feelings being sold as transformation. When really, you're just cold and then you're not cold and your body reacted accordingly.
Speaker 2:For a few hours and then it's gone.
Speaker 1:Brilliant. Another wellness trend where the headlines and the science are two completely different things.
Speaker 2:At least this time, we've got a comprehensive meta analysis to point to, even if almost no one's talking about what it actually says.
Speaker 1:Right. That's all for today's dive into the data. Just remember, everything we've discussed is our interpretation of published research and shouldn't replace professional medical advice.
Speaker 2:Absolutely. If you're dealing with health or mental concerns, talk to your doctor, not just us data nerds on a podcast.
Speaker 1:I'm Alex Barrett.
Speaker 2:And I'm Bill Morrison.
Speaker 1:And we'll see you next time
Speaker 2:On truth seekers.
Speaker 1:Until then, question everything.
Speaker 2:But verify with data.