Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Sky Blue Time Machine is a Coventry City podcast. Each week, Danny and Sarah
work through a season of Sky Blues football — and a second one, from a
different decade. Sometimes the parallel rhymes. Sometimes it doesn't. The
show is the conversation about which.
A KCHN Enterprises LLC production. skybluetimemachine.com
[VOICE_NOTE: Warm and measured, building from dread to clarity. Let the weight land on key phrases.]
REGISTER: warm
**Danny:** Right. So before we start I want to say something, which is that this week we agreed we were going to do the league. Not the cup. Not Wembley. Not the bit with the steps and the song. The league.
**Sarah:** The league.
**Danny:** And I've been dreading it all week, if I'm honest.
**Sarah:** [wry]I noticed[/wry]. You sent me three messages on Thursday that were just the word "anyway" with no context.
**Danny:** Yeah. That's what dread looks like in my texts. It's just "anyway" with nothing attached.
**Sarah:** I want to read you something before we get going, actually. It's from David's notebook, and I went looking for it specifically because of what this episode is. It's an entry from March 1987, and it just says — and this is the whole entry — "comfortable. Boring. Long may it last." Three words and a wish.
**Danny:** [pause] That's beautiful.
**Sarah:** And the reason I wanted to start with that is because, look, we've spent five episodes building up the parallel. Two Wembleys, thirty years apart. Same colour shirt. Same long walk up the steps. And the joke we've been telling — the ladder inverted, the ceiling becomes the floor — that joke has been doing a lot of work for us.
**Danny:** It has.
**Sarah:** This week the joke breaks.
**Danny:** [flat]Right.[/flat]
**Sarah:** Because when you actually sit down with the two league tables in front of you — 1986/87 First Division, tenth place, and 2016/17 League One, twenty-third out of twenty-four — they're not two versions of the same story. They're two completely different stories about two completely different clubs. And the only thing they have in common is that both of them end at Wembley.
**Danny:** And the shirt.
**Sarah:** And the shirt.
**Danny:** I mean, look. I knew this was the episode where we had to actually look at it. We've been around it. We've been doing the bus parade, the kitchen, the Two-Tone stuff, the long walk to Highfield Road — all of which is real, all of which matters. But the league table is the bit that says: this is what was actually happening. And in 2016/17 what was actually happening was the club was disappearing.
**Sarah:** Disappearing's the right word.
**Danny:** It's not relegated. Relegated is what it ends up being. Disappearing is the verb.
**Sarah:** And I think the question we have to answer this week — or sit with, anyway — is what does it cost a supporter base to watch that happen? Not the relegation itself. The watching of it.
**Danny:** Yeah.
**Sarah:** Because the Wembley story we'll tell next week. That story has a sort of redemption shape to it whether you want it to or not. This week is the bit underneath. This is the floor.
**Danny:** Right. So the company we were keeping. Because that's where you wanted to start.
**Sarah:** That's where I want to start. Because I've been looking at the 2016/17 League One bottom four and I want to read you who Coventry were sinking with, because in a strange way it tells you what kind of trouble it was. Bottom four that season — and the order matters here, because it's not what you'd assume. Chesterfield at the bottom. Then Coventry in twenty-third. Then Swindon in twenty-second. Then Port Vale in twenty-first.
**Danny:** So Coventry weren't even bottom.
**Sarah:** Twenty-third out of twenty-four. One place off the floor. And the reason I want to sit with that order is because Coventry had more points than Chesterfield and still went down with them. That's how tight it was. And none of those four clubs — none of them — are clubs you'd look at and go, oh, they shouldn't be here. They were all just there. And Coventry were among them.
**Danny:** Below Swindon.
**Sarah:** Below Swindon. Who beat Coventry both times that season. Home and away. And below Port Vale, who Coventry did beat — home and away. So you've got a season where you're taking points off one of the clubs directly above you and getting nothing off the other, and you still go down together. And Chesterfield, at the bottom — Coventry beat them at home and lost away. So the results aren't even consistent within the bottom four. That's what makes the arithmetic so bleak. You could point to individual wins and they meant nothing by May.
**Danny:** You beat the right teams on the wrong days.
**Sarah:** That's the season, yeah.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured and reflective. Let the statistics and dates land with quiet weight. No rush.]
REGISTER: conversational, analytical
**Danny:** That's the season in one stat, isn't it.
**Sarah:** It's the season in one stat. And the moment relegation was confirmed — I've been trying to pin this down because I keep seeing different dates — the practical, mathematical, no-route-back moment was mid-April. The Charlton draw, 14th April. That was the day the calculator put its pen down.
**Danny:** And I remember that day, Sarah. And it wasn't even — there wasn't a moment. There wasn't a goal where you went, that's it. It was — by then it had been it for weeks. The Charlton game was the formal notification. The actual thing had happened in November.
**Sarah:** Say more about that.
**Danny:** I mean, I've thought about this a lot. People will say relegation was confirmed in April, and technically yes, the maths needs a date. But anyone who was watching knew by the autumn. There was a heavy defeat at Norwich in August — League Cup, six-one — that wasn't a defeat, that was a diagnosis. And the league results around it were already telling you. No wins in the first ten. Mowbray going at the end of September. And from October onwards every weekend was just confirmation. Confirmation, confirmation, confirmation, until April when somebody said right, that's enough confirmation, you can have the certificate now.
**Sarah:** Compare that to 1987 because I want to show people what a different shape this is.
**Danny:** Yeah, go on.
**Sarah:** In 1987 First Division, two of the relegated sides were Aston Villa — Aston Villa, who'd won the European Cup five years earlier — and Leicester City. Manchester City were also in serious relegation trouble that season. So the relegation conversation that year included a former European champion, a Midlands rival, and Manchester City. The Coventry-finishing-tenth conversation was happening in the same division as the Manchester-City-going-down conversation.
**Danny:** Which now reads like a fever dream.
**Sarah:** It reads like fiction. And Coventry's gap above the relegation zone in 1987 was considerable. Coventry on sixty-three points. The relegated sides well behind. That's not safety. That's a different postcode from safety.
**Danny:** And the thing I want to say about that — because this is where the ladder thing properly breaks for me — is that in 1987, the worst version of Coventry's season, the absolute floor of what could go wrong, was finishing closer to Manchester City than we'd have liked. That was the disaster scenario. Whereas in 2016/17 the floor was, will any other team ever play us in front of more than ten thousand people again.
**Sarah:** And the answer to that, by April, was no.
**Danny:** Was no. Apart from the one time.
**Sarah:** Apart from the one time. Which we'll get to.
REGISTER: conversational, intimate
**Danny:** So the ladder. I was going to do the ladder bit. I'm not going to do the ladder bit.
**Sarah:** [soft]No, do it.[/soft]
**Danny:** No, I mean — the joke has been, all series, that we win at Wembley in our worst league seasons. Inverted ladder. Ceiling is the floor. Right. But what I realised this week, properly, sitting with the numbers — it's not an inverted ladder. It's two different ladders. In 1987 we were tenth in the top flight in a country with ninety-two professional clubs. In 2017 we were sixty-seventh. Sixty-seventh. There's no inversion of that. That's just falling.
**Sarah:** That's the line.
**Danny:** That's where I am this week.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, analytical storytelling. Build momentum through the statistics and timeline. Sarah leads with clarity; Danny responds with earned weight.]
REGISTER: conversational, analytical
**Sarah:** Should we look at the gap?
**Danny:** Yeah. Do the gap.
**Sarah:** So this is the bit I get accused of being too American about, which is — I want to put numbers on the feeling. The mid-table in 1987 was a kind of, what's the phrase — everyone draws everyone. Coventry finished tenth, with twelve draws across forty-two games. Almost a third of their fixtures shared the points. And in a First Division that's bunched mid-table, a draw is currency. Each draw is a deposit. Each draw says, we're not in trouble this week, see you next week.
**Danny:** Right.
**Sarah:** Compare 2016/17. I went through the games week by week — I had a spreadsheet open while I was doing this and I had David's notebook open next to me on the desk, which is a sentence I never thought I'd say —
**Danny:** [laugh] Both tabs.
**Sarah:** Both tabs. And what you can see in the 2016/17 column is the gap to safety widening week after week, almost in slow motion. Mowbray's opening run: no wins, draws and losses piling up before he went at the end of September. Points dropping fast. That's where the gap opens. Then under Venus and Slade through the autumn and winter the team picks up enough scraps to look briefly like it might get going. But around those there are heavy defeats — Charlton away, Bristol Rovers away on Boxing Day, four-one that one. And by January the gap to safety isn't a gap any more, it's a chasm.
**Danny:** The Boxing Day game at Bristol Rovers.
**Sarah:** Tell me.
**Danny:** That was an early Slade game. He'd been appointed just before Christmas. Lost 4-1. And Willis scored, which is the thing that sticks — Coventry's own centre-back, born in Coventry, academy product, pulling it back to 2-1 before Bristol Rovers ran away with it. And I remember thinking, right, the local lad is scoring, because nobody else is going to. Which is — the draws-as-currency thing — in 1987 the draws are deposits. In 2017 the draws and the rare wins are loans you're taking out against a future that you know is already mortgaged.
**Sarah:** That's good.
**Danny:** I mean it.
REGISTER: conversational, analytical
**Sarah:** No, that's good. The future is already mortgaged. That's the line. Because here's the thing — I've been working out the points across the last ten matches of 2016/17. Four wins, a draw, five losses. Thirteen points from ten games. Now that's not promotion form, but it's not nothing either. Port Vale at home, Bristol Rovers at home, Peterborough at home, Walsall at home — four wins in that run. And yet by the time those wins arrived, the maths had already closed. They were finding form too late to matter.
**Danny:** Which is the cruellest version of it.
**Sarah:** It is the cruellest version of it. Because if that form had come earlier, those points would have been the difference. But it didn't. And by the time it did, the gap to safety wasn't a gap that could be closed inside the remaining fixtures.
**Danny:** When was the last week it was mathematically possible?
**Sarah:** The draw with Charlton on the 14th of April was the bit that ended it. They needed wins, they got a draw, somebody else got a win, and the door shut. The Scunthorpe defeat on the last day was the announcement. The Charlton draw was the death. And the bit that I keep coming back to — is that the Charlton game was the pig game.
**Danny:** The pig game.
**Sarah:** Plastic pigs on the pitch. Both sets of fans throwing them, both sets of fans protesting their respective owners. The match was delayed while stewards picked up plastic pigs. And the home side was being relegated during this.
**Danny:** Yeah.
**Sarah:** And in 1987 — to keep the comparison alive — the equivalent moment was Coventry finishing the league season with a draw against Southampton. Locked in tenth place. Steady. Boring. Comfortable.
**Danny:** [pause]
**Sarah:** Long may it last.
REGISTER: conversational, intimate
**Danny:** [soft]Long may it last.[/soft] Yeah.
**Sarah:** Right. So I want to ask you something, and you can take as long as you need with it, or you can deflect, your call.
**Danny:** Oh god.
**Sarah:** Was there a moment in 2016/17 — a specific one, a single moment — where you thought, this is pointless. This is not worth doing. Following this club is objectively a waste of time. Was there a moment?
**Danny:** [long-pause]
**Sarah:** Take your time.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, reflective, searching for honesty. This is Danny working through something difficult. Slow pacing.]
REGISTER: intimate, confessional
**Danny:** Yeah. There was. I've been — look, I knew you were going to ask me this, because we'd flagged this topic, and I've been turning it over for about a week trying to find the right moment because there were a few candidates. The Cambridge game in December, the four-nil. That was a candidate. The Norwich six-one in August, which was the League Cup so it almost doesn't count but it was the moment in August when I thought, oh, this isn't going to be like the other bad seasons. The Bristol Rovers Boxing Day. There were a few.
**Sarah:** But.
**Danny:** But the one I keep coming back to was a Tuesday night. It was the Southend home game on the 14th of March. The one where the attendance was seven thousand four hundred and sixty-six, which I know because you've told me about three times.
**Sarah:** [wry]I have.[/wry]
**Danny:** And I wasn't there. That's the bit I want to say first. I wasn't there. I was at home, in Nuneaton, and the game was on a Tuesday night, and I'd been at work, and the kick-off was eight-ish, and at about seven thirty I sat down and put the kettle on and looked at the radio — because I was going to put the radio on, listen to BBC CWR — and I sat there for about ten minutes and didn't turn it on. And eventually I made the tea and I went and sat in the front room and I watched something on the telly that wasn't the football. I think it was — I genuinely don't remember what it was. Probably one of those programmes about, I don't know, people doing up a house in the Cotswolds. Something — something else.
**Sarah:** [soft]Yeah.[/soft]
**Danny:** And around ten I checked the score on my phone and Coventry had lost 2-0. Southend, two-nil down, Ranger and Leonard. And I looked at the score and I didn't feel anything. I didn't feel bad. I didn't feel angry. I didn't feel disappointed. I felt nothing. And then I felt — and this is the bit that I've been trying to find the words for — I felt frightened. Because I'd not felt anything. And that scared me more than the score did. The score was just a fact. The not-feeling was — I don't know. The not-feeling was the bit that made me think, am I done with this. Is this the year I stop.
**Sarah:** Yeah.
**Danny:** And the reason that was the moment — it wasn't the score, it wasn't the result, it wasn't the league position even, because I knew the league position. It was that I'd made a choice not to listen, and the choice hadn't cost me anything. And that's — that's not how it's supposed to work. Following Coventry is supposed to cost you something. The whole point of it is that it costs you something. If it stops costing you something, you're not really following it any more. You're just — you've just got an opinion about a colour.
**Sarah:** [long-pause]
**Danny:** And I want to be careful here, because I don't want to make this sound bigger than it was. I went back. The next home game I went to. I didn't stop. But I want to be honest that in that week, the week after the Southend game, I thought about stopping. Properly thought about it. Not as a feeling. As a — as an option. Like, this is a thing I could do. I could not do this any more. Other people have done it. Trevor did it. After 1987 Trevor did it, and Trevor was the most committed Coventry fan I knew, and Trevor stopped, and Trevor is fine. Trevor has a life. Trevor — Trevor watches it on the telly and that's that. And I thought, I could do that. I could be Trevor.
**Sarah:** What stopped you?
**Danny:** Honestly? I don't know that anything stopped me. I think what happened was — and this is going to sound stupid — what happened was a few days after the Southend game, on the Saturday, they lost away. One-nil. And I checked the score and I felt — I felt the disappointment back. The not-feeling went away. And I realised it had been a passing thing. A week of not-feeling. And then the disappointment came back like a — like a draught under a door. And I was, you know, weirdly grateful for it. Because it meant I wasn't done.
**Sarah:** That's the most Coventry sentence anyone's ever said.
**Danny:** What is?
**Sarah:** Weirdly grateful for the disappointment, because it means I'm not done. That's the whole show in one line.
[VOICE_NOTE: Warm, reflective exhale. Thoughtful agreement, not reluctant. Gentle pace.]
[BEAT: warm]
**Danny:** [exhale] Yeah. I suppose.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, reflective storytelling. Sarah carries the weight of comparison; Danny listens intently.]
REGISTER: Conversational, analytical
**Sarah:** And I want to say something, Danny, which is that there's no equivalent moment in 1987. I've gone looking. I've read through David's notebooks for that period and the worst entries — the worst entries are things like "frustrating, defended too deep" or "should have won that, oh well, on we go". There's no moment in 1987 where any sensible person sits down and asks the question, is this worth doing. Because of course it's worth doing. Tenth in the top flight, FA Cup run on, Highfield Road full, factories still mostly running, Two-Tone still being played on the radio, Curtis and Sillett in charge, Regis and Houchen up front. The question doesn't arrive in 1987. You'd have to manufacture it to ask it.
**Danny:** Right.
**Sarah:** The question arrives in 2017 unprompted. The question arrives like a — like a bill in the post that you weren't expecting.
**Danny:** Yeah. The protest culture didn't help, by the way. I know we're going to get to that.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, reflective storytelling. Build the argument slowly with quiet conviction.]
REGISTER: conversational, intimate
But — the protest culture was real, and it was justified, and I want to say upfront I was sympathetic to it and to an extent participated in it. But part of what made the not-feeling possible was that the singing voice of the crowd had been pointed at the boardroom for so long that there was no singing voice left for the team. And once the team has stopped having a singing voice pointed at it, the team becomes — the team becomes a fact rather than a presence. And it's hard to keep showing up for a fact.
**Sarah:** That's where I want to go next, actually. The atmosphere. Because I've been doing the comparative atmosphere rating — which sounds stupid because how do you rate an atmosphere — but bear with me. Highfield Road, spring 1987, FA Cup run building, average league attendance somewhere in the low to mid teens, but rising as the season went on. Walking up Primrose Hill Street twenty minutes before kick-off you'd hear it. The hum. Pre-match. The Mercers Arms backing up onto the pavement. People stopping you to ask if you'd heard who'd been drawn next, which depending on the week could be Stoke or Sheffield Wednesday or Leeds. And the atmosphere wasn't — it wasn't ecstatic. It wasn't carnival. It was anticipatory. It was a crowd that thought something was going to happen and didn't want to miss it.
**Danny:** Yeah.
**Sarah:** Now compare. Spring 2017, the Ricoh. Capacity thirty-two thousand six hundred and nine. Average league attendance across the season nine thousand one hundred and eleven. Which means on any given weekend, twenty-three and a half thousand seats are empty. That is — that is more empty seats than the total attendance. The empty seats outnumber the present people by nearly three to one.
**Danny:** And the empty seats have a sound.
**Sarah:** Tell me.
**Danny:** They do. Empty seats — empty plastic seats in a half-empty bowl have an acoustic signature. They reflect noise differently. They — if you go to a packed ground every sound is absorbed by people. People are made of soft things. People absorb noise. Plastic seats reflect it. So when you go to a half-empty stadium the noise that's there bounces around in a way that makes it sound — it sounds like a swimming pool. There's a — there's a reverb on it that isn't there at a full ground. And once you've heard it, you can't unhear it.
**Sarah:** [soft]Yeah.[/soft]
**Danny:** And the Ricoh in spring 2017 sounded like a swimming pool. With protest songs in it.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, analytical storytelling. Build the argument calmly through contrast. Let the ideas land.]
REGISTER: informative, reflective
**Sarah:** The Sky Blues Trust were running organised protest action that spring. Banners, boycott campaigns — fans refusing to spend money inside the ground, no programmes, no pies, no half-time pint, sometimes refusing to buy tickets at all and watching from the pub, which is part of why the attendances were what they were. It wasn't just disillusionment. It was organised. There was a strategy. And the strategy was: deny the owners the matchday revenue until something changes.
**Danny:** And the strategy worked in the narrow sense that the revenue was denied. The strategy didn't work in the broader sense that nothing actually changed in the ownership structure for another six years.
**Sarah:** SISU were still there until January 2023.
**Danny:** Until 2023. Nearly six more years from this point. So the boycott — the boycott was an act of faith with no expected payoff inside any reasonable timeframe. And I think that's worth saying out loud, because the people who did the boycott weren't naive. They knew it might not work. They did it anyway. Because — and this is the bit I want to get to — they did it anyway because the alternative was buying a pie and pretending.
**Sarah:** And the banners. The banners said specific things. They named Joy Seppala. They named Tim Fisher. The chants — the chants were direct, by name, in a way that football chants very rarely are. Usually a chant is a piece of generic abuse you could direct at any boardroom. These were targeted.
**Danny:** They were research-led chants.
**Sarah:** [laugh] They were. That's the only time I'll ever say that about a football chant. But they were. They were essentially audible briefing documents. If you'd never been to a football match before and you'd walked into the Ricoh in March 2017, you'd have come out knowing the names of two specific hedge-fund executives. That's — that's a strange thing for a football crowd to teach you.
**Danny:** And I want to say something about Highfield Road by way of contrast, because we've talked about Highfield Road a lot and I don't want to repeat myself. But — the thing about Highfield Road in spring 1987 was that nobody in the crowd knew the chairman's name. Not knew-knew. They knew it was John Poynton, you could find it in the programme. But nobody chanted it. Nobody had an opinion about him as a person. The boardroom wasn't a character in the matchday experience. The boardroom was just — the boardroom was the building that the team came out of. It was scenery.
**Sarah:** Whereas in 2017 the boardroom was the antagonist.
**Danny:** The boardroom was the antagonist. The pitch was the second act. And the result was the bit you found out about later when you got home.
**Sarah:** And the thing that I keep returning to is the same colour shirt. Same badge. Same Sky Blue Song, played over the tannoy before kick-off. Same chairs in the dugout, more or less. Same — same physical objects, doing completely different work. In 1987 the badge meant: we are this place, this place is fine, come and watch. In 2017 the badge meant: we are still here, despite, in spite, against, anyway.
**Danny:** Anyway.
**Sarah:** Anyway is the word.
**Danny:** Yeah. And the Sky Blues Trust thing — I want to be specific about something, because I think people who weren't there might miss the texture of it. The protests weren't being run by a fringe. The Trust was the mainstream. The Trust was the median Coventry supporter, organised. It wasn't a small group of agitators. It was — it was Dave from down the road and his daughter, and the bloke who used to drive a Jaguar from Browns Lane and is now retired and angry. It was the whole spread of Coventry supporters, finding a structure for their anger that wasn't just shouting at the telly.
**Sarah:** And the thing I want to flag — because we'll come back to this in episode eight — is that the Trust and the boycott and the banners and the chants did something to the very texture of what it meant to support Coventry City. It made support an act of opposition rather than affirmation. You weren't going to the Ricoh in 2017 to celebrate the club. You were going to defend it. From the people who owned it.
**Danny:** Which is a different verb.
**Sarah:** Which is a completely different verb. And I think the people who carried both a banner and a season ticket at the same time — and there were thousands of them, that's the bit I keep coming back to, thousands of people who paid SISU for the ticket and then walked into the ground with a sign telling SISU to leave —
**Danny:** Which is the most Coventry thing imaginable.
**Sarah:** It's the most Coventry thing imaginable. Hand the man your money and then tell him you want him gone. With your money. Already in his pocket.
**Danny:** [laugh] Yeah.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, reflective, building emotional weight. Sarah leads with philosophical depth; Danny grounds it. Pause before the final exchange.]
REGISTER: Storytelling
**Sarah:** And I think — I think what you do with that is you respect it. Because that's faith. That's faith of a kind that's almost theological. You're paying for something you're protesting against, because the thing you're protesting against and the thing you love are the same thing, and you can't separate them, and you wouldn't if you could.
**Danny:** And those people — the banner-and-season-ticket people — those are the people who went to Wembley.
**Sarah:** Those are the people who went to Wembley. Seventy-four thousand four hundred and thirty-four of them.
**Danny:** Twelve days before relegation was confirmed.
**Sarah:** Twelve days before. And I want to hold that number in the room for a second because we'll come back to it next week properly, but — seventy-four thousand four hundred and thirty-four at Wembley on the 2nd of April. Seven thousand six hundred and forty-six at the Ricoh against Southend on the 14th of March. The same supporter base. Three weeks apart. A factor of ten difference. Same shirts. Same songs. Same people, even — a lot of the same actual humans were in both crowds.
**Danny:** A lot of the same humans were in both crowds.
**Sarah:** What does that tell you?
**Danny:** It tells you — it tells you that what they were refusing to fund and what they were willing to celebrate were two different things. They were refusing to fund SISU's Tuesday-night league football. They were willing to celebrate Coventry City at Wembley. And the club was both of those things at the same time, and the fans could hold the contradiction.
**Sarah:** Could hold the contradiction.
**Danny:** Could hold it. Two hands. Banner in one. Season ticket in the other. Walk into the ground anyway.
**Sarah:** Anyway.
**Danny:** [pause]
**Sarah:** And the thing I want to set up — and I'm aware we're getting close to where we need to break this — the thing I want to set up is that next week we have to tell the Wembley story properly. The 2017 Wembley story. Bigirimana in the eleventh minute, George Thomas in the fifty-fifth, Sercombe pulling one back for Oxford on seventy-five. Two-one to Coventry. First trophy in thirty years.
**Danny:** And we have to tell it knowing what we've just told. Knowing the league context. Knowing the Southend Tuesday and the plastic pigs and the not-feeling and the banners and the seven thousand six hundred and forty-six.
**Sarah:** Knowing all of that.
**Danny:** Which is going to make next week — next week's an odd one, isn't it. Next week's a celebration that takes place at a funeral.
**Sarah:** A wake at a coronation.
**Danny:** Yeah. Or — yeah. That's better. A wake at a coronation. Because the coronation was real. The wake was also real. The bit nobody can tell you is which one was the main event.
REGISTER: intimate, reflective
**Sarah:** And I genuinely don't know the answer to that, Danny.
**Danny:** No. Me neither. And I was at Wembley.
**Sarah:** You were at Wembley.
**Danny:** I was at Wembley. And I remember the noise. I remember it being — and this is the bit I haven't said out loud yet on the show — I remember it being acoustically identical to what I remember from 1987. Which I was nine for, and which is a memory I don't fully trust because I was nine. But the noise at Wembley in April 2017, when Bigirimana scored — that noise had the same shape as the noise from when I was nine. Same shape. And underneath it everything was completely different. The club was about to go down. The factories were gone. The city had voted Leave. Trevor wasn't there. My dad wasn't there. I was forty by then, nearly. And the noise — the noise was identical. And I don't know what to do with that.
**Sarah:** I think you don't have to do anything with it. I think next week we sit with it.
**Danny:** Yeah.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, reflective tone. Sarah builds argument with quiet conviction. Danny responds with understated agreement.]
REGISTER: Reflective, measured
**Sarah:** And I think the thing we have to be careful of next week is not letting the trophy do work it can't do. The trophy can't unrelegate the team. The trophy can't refund the boycott. The trophy can't bring Trevor back to the ground.
**Danny:** No.
**Sarah:** But the trophy is also not nothing. And the people who went, all seventy-four thousand of them, weren't wrong to go. They weren't being naive. They knew what was coming twelve days later. They went anyway.
**Danny:** Anyway. The word of the season.
**Sarah:** The word of the season.
[VOICE_NOTE: Reflective and measured. Build toward the gravity of what's being said. Let pauses land.]
REGISTER: warm
**Danny:** And I want to flag one more thing before we break, which is — we said at the top that this was the heaviest episode. I don't know that I think it is now. I think this is the episode that makes the next one possible. You can't tell the Wembley story honestly without telling this one first. Otherwise the Wembley story is just a montage. It's the bit of the documentary with the strings underneath.
**Sarah:** And we're not making that documentary.
**Danny:** No. So next week we do it properly. Wembley. Both Wembleys. The header from 1987 and the loose ball from 2017. Houchen and Bigirimana. The two visits. Against the context we've just laid down.
**Sarah:** Which is — let me just say one more time, because I want it on the record — the context is that in spring 2017, supporting Coventry City required a kind of will that the 1987 version did not require. The 1987 version required attention. The 2017 version required will. Those are different words.
**Danny:** And the fact that those seventy-four thousand people produced enough of it to make Wembley sound the way it sounded — that's the thing we have to honour next week.
**Sarah:** Honour is the right word. Without inflating it, without softening what it cost.
**Danny:** Anyway. I had a voicemail this week from my mate Kev — I'm not going to play it now, we'll come back to him later in the series — but he left me a voice note at about three in the morning on Wednesday. The gist of it was, and I'm paraphrasing: he was thinking about what Wembley would have felt like if Coventry had been mid-table in League One that season instead of bottom. Would it have been better, or worse, or the same.
**Sarah:** Oh, that's a good question.
**Danny:** I've been chewing on it for two days. Because the trophy can't be separated from the context, can it. The trophy is the context. The trophy meant what it meant because of the league position. If they'd been ninth in League One, the EFL Trophy would have been a nice day out. Because they were twenty-third, it was the thing.
**Sarah:** The only thing. Which is what next week has to deal with.
**Danny:** And whether something can be the only thing and also be enough.
**Sarah:** [pause] Yeah. Whether it's enough.
REGISTER: reflective, analytical
**Danny:** Yeah. And whether — I'm going to stop, because I'm circling — whether being at Wembley in April 2017 with Coventry City was, in any meaningful way, the same act as being at Wembley in May 1987 with Coventry City. Same building. Same colour shirts. Same long walk up the steps if we got there. Same trophy lift. Different — different everything else.
**Sarah:** Different everything else.
**Danny:** And the question of whether those two acts are the same act —
**Sarah:** — is the question, isn't it. And I don't think we answer it tonight. I think we just sit with it being the question.
**Danny:** Right. So — let's actually leave Wembley alone for a bit. Because we'll do it properly next week and I don't want to spoil my own dinner. Let me pull on something you said earlier, about the will. The will of the seventy-four thousand. Because I want to know — and this is genuinely a question for you, not a setup — I want to know what the texture of that will looked like online. Because I wasn't on Twitter in 2017. I had an account, I used it to check the score when I wasn't at the ground. I wasn't in the conversation. And you were.
**Sarah:** I was in the conversation. From three thousand miles away, but yeah, I was in it.
**Danny:** So tell me what it looked like. Because the thing I keep bumping up against is — in 1987, if you wanted to know what other Coventry fans were thinking, you bought the Coventry Telegraph on a Saturday night and on Monday morning, and you read the letters page on Wednesday, and that was the entire feedback loop. Once a week. Filtered through an editor. Lag time of seven days minimum between you having a feeling and seeing whether anyone else shared it.
**Sarah:** Right. So the loop was — the loop existed, but it had latency built into it. You had to wait. The waiting was part of the form.
**Danny:** The waiting was part of the form. And by the time your letter ran, the team had played another game, so the feeling you were expressing was already two weeks out of date. It was geology. It was sediment.
**Sarah:** And in 2017 it was weather.
**Danny:** It was weather.
**Sarah:** It was minute-by-minute weather. And — okay, so let me try to describe it, because I think this matters. The 2016/17 Coventry Twitter scene was — it was its own ecosystem. You had the main accounts, the news-wire accounts that were basically functioning as press for the protest movement, relaying BBC CWR phone-in clips and screenshots from the Telegraph and stills from the away end. You had the Sky Blues Trust as an organisational hub, with an actual structured presence, posting agendas and meeting notes. You had the supporter accounts, hundreds of them, all of whom you sort of came to recognise by handle even though you'd never meet any of them. And running through all of it, like a hashtag spine — SISU out. Sisu out. Time after time after time.
**Danny:** And the function of that — what was that doing? Was it organising? Was it venting? Was it both?
**Sarah:** It was both, and I think it was a third thing too, which is — it was *witnessing*. It was a public record. You couldn't, after 2016/17, claim that the fanbase had been quiet about what was happening. The receipts were there. Searchable. Time-stamped. Hundreds of thousands of tweets across the season. You can still go and read them now if you know how to search Twitter archives. The whole protest is preserved in a way that the 1987 letters page just isn't.
**Danny:** Right. And the letters page — even the ones that got published — they're in microfiche somewhere in the Herbert. You'd have to physically go and crank a machine to read them.
**Sarah:** And most of the ones that didn't get published are gone. Just gone. The bin.
**Danny:** Gone in the bin in 1987. Whereas the 2016 tweets are findable.
**Sarah:** Findable. And — here's the thing that genuinely surprised me when I started digging, because I'd had this idea that online fan culture was all heat and no light, and the 2016/17 Coventry Twitter scene wasn't that. It was *organised*. There were spreadsheets going around. Attendance trackers. People doing the maths on what SISU's losses were, what the rent at the Ricoh was, what the cash flow looked like — fans who were accountants by day pulling apart the published accounts at night and posting their working. Genuinely forensic stuff.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, conversational storytelling. Build the infrastructure metaphor with clarity. Let pauses breathe.]
REGISTER: informative, reflective
**Danny:** I didn't know that.
**Sarah:** I know you didn't. Because you weren't in the room. The room was on Twitter, and the room was BBC CWR phone-ins, and the room was the Sky Blues Trust meetings — and the three of those things were feeding each other constantly. Someone would phone CWR on a Wednesday lunchtime with a point about the accounts, that would get clipped and put on Twitter by half past one, the Trust would pick it up by teatime, by Saturday someone had it on a banner.
**Danny:** Right. Whereas in 1987 —
**Sarah:** In 1987, if you'd noticed something in the club accounts — which, I should say, were also published, this is not new — if you'd noticed something in the club accounts, you'd have written to the Telegraph, and you'd have had to be a particular kind of person with a particular kind of confidence to do that, and your letter would have run or not run depending on the editor's mood that week, and if it ran, seventy-four thousand people would read it on Tuesday, and then it would be gone. And no one would ever search for it again.
**Danny:** And it strikes me — and this is the bit I want to actually land — the feedback loop in 1987 was so slow that *the club could ignore it*. The board could just not engage. The letters page wasn't a pressure mechanism in any real sense. It was a release valve. It let the fans express themselves and the board never had to respond. And in 2016 —
**Sarah:** In 2016, the board couldn't ignore it. Or — they tried to ignore it, which is a different thing, but the choice to ignore was a *visible* choice. You could see Joy Seppala not responding. You could see Tim Fisher saying the wrong thing in an interview and watch the wrong thing go round the network six times in twenty minutes and become the Wrong Thing forever.
**Danny:** And that's the thing — what online fan sentiment in 2016/17 reveals about the mood isn't just the mood. It reveals the *infrastructure* of the mood. The fact that the mood could be measured, watched, mapped. The fact that the mood had a sort of — a temperature gauge.
**Sarah:** A real-time gauge. Hour by hour.
**Danny:** And the question I have — and this is the bit I want you to push back on if you think I'm wrong — is whether having that gauge made it better or worse to be a supporter. Because there's a version of this where being able to see, in real time, that everyone else was as fed up as you were, is a comfort. You're not alone. You're not mad. There are seven thousand other people who think this is a disaster.
**Sarah:** Yeah.
**Danny:** And there's another version where being able to see, in real time, the full extent of how grim the situation is — being unable to *escape* the full extent — is just permanent low-grade misery. You can't look away. There's no Wednesday lunchtime when you forget about it for a few hours. It's on your phone. It's in your pocket. It's pinging while you're trying to eat dinner.
**Sarah:** I think both are true. And I think the people who got the most out of online fan culture in 2016/17 were the ones who used it as the comfort and *not* the misery — who logged on once a day, read the timeline, knew they weren't alone, logged off. The ones who got the worst of it were the ones who couldn't put the phone down. And I include myself in the second category for stretches.
**Danny:** You were doom-scrolling Coventry City from Brooklyn.
**Sarah:** I was doom-scrolling Coventry City from Brooklyn. At three in the morning sometimes. Which is — that is a genuinely strange sentence. My father's club, three thousand miles away, a division I'd never seen in person, a stadium I'd never been to, an ownership group I'd never met, and I was up at three in the morning reading tweets about a Tuesday night defeat to Southend.
**Danny:** And what was driving that? Honestly?
**Sarah:** Honestly — and this is the bit I haven't said out loud on the show — I think it was that my dad was getting older, and the club had become the daily contact point between us, and if I let a day go by without checking on the club, I was letting a day go by without checking on him. And the protest movement gave me something to *do*. It gave me a structure. I could re-tweet a Trust post. I could quote-tweet a CWR clip. I was — and I knew this at the time, I'm not pretending I didn't — I was performing membership of a community I had no physical access to. And Twitter let me do that.
**Danny:** Right. Yeah.
**Sarah:** Whereas David, who actually was from Coventry, who'd left in the seventies — David didn't have that. David had — David had what he'd always had. Letters in the post. The World Soccer subscription. A phone call to his sister. Which, weirdly, was the 1987 model. He'd just kept the 1987 model running into 2017. The technology had moved on around him and he hadn't noticed because his version of being a supporter was already complete.
**Danny:** Whereas you'd built yours on the new infrastructure.
**Sarah:** I'd built mine on the new infrastructure. And — look, I want to be careful not to suggest the new infrastructure is worse. It isn't. I had access to things David never had access to. I could read Trust meeting minutes the day they were written. I could see the away end at Bramall Lane in real time. I could pull up attendance figures. I had data. He had memory.
**Danny:** Different things.
**Sarah:** Different things. And I don't think either of us would say the other was doing it wrong. But the 2016/17 supporter — the one who built their relationship to the club online — that person didn't exist in 1987. Couldn't have existed.
**Danny:** And the question, I suppose, is whether that person counts as a Coventry supporter in the same way Trevor counted as a Coventry supporter.
**Sarah:** And the answer has to be yes, doesn't it. Because if the answer is no, then I don't count.
**Danny:** I think the answer is yes. I think — look, I think the long-haul fan, the bloke who's been going since 1948 or whatever, that person and the person who's been on Coventry Twitter since 2014 are both Coventry fans. Different shapes, different infrastructure, same — same baton.
**Sarah:** Same baton.
**Danny:** And the 1987 letters page is the ancestor of the 2017 Twitter timeline. It's the same impulse. To make the feeling public. To put it in writing somewhere other people can see. The infrastructure changed. The impulse is identical.
**Sarah:** The impulse is identical. And I think that's actually the answer to the question you asked at the start of this bit, about whether having the gauge made it better or worse. It made it *louder*. Whether that's better or worse depends on what you needed it to be. If you needed the comfort of knowing other people felt the same, the gauge was a gift. If you needed somewhere to put your feelings so you could go and do something else with your Saturday — the gauge was a trap.
**Danny:** A trap.
**Sarah:** A trap.
**Danny:** [pause] And while we're on the subject of 2017 and what people were dealing with — and I want to widen this out, because we've been inside the football for the last however-many minutes, and I think we should step outside it for a bit — what were the seven thousand people who went to Southend and the seventy-four thousand who went to Wembley actually going home to that spring? What was the city doing while the club was getting relegated?
**Sarah:** This is your set-piece, isn't it.
**Danny:** This is my set-piece. I've been holding this one for a while.
**Sarah:** Take it.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, reflective storytelling. Ground the listener in place and time. Let the statistics breathe.]
REGISTER: Narrative exposition with data integration
**Danny:** Right. Okay. So — Coventry in spring 2017. Let me try and put a person in a place and walk you through what was around them, because I think that's the only honest way to do this. Imagine you're a supporter coming out of the Ricoh on the 14th of March after the two-nil defeat to Southend. You're one of the seven thousand six hundred and forty-six. You get the 60A back into town. You're dropped at Pool Meadow. You walk across the bus station, you come up into the Lower Precinct, you cut through towards the Cathedral Lanes, and what you're walking through, on a Tuesday night in March 2017, is — empty units. Quite a lot of empty units. Charity shops, vape shops, units papered over with brown paper saying *coming soon* in a font that suggests nothing is, in fact, coming soon.
**Sarah:** Right.
**Danny:** The Lower Precinct, which was the absolute throbbing heart of the city in the seventies and eighties — Owen Owen as an anchor, indoor market doing twelve thousand on a Saturday, all of that — by 2017 the Lower Precinct is half-vacant in places. Not entirely. There's still trade. But the vacancy rate is high enough that you notice it walking through, especially in the evening when half the units that *are* trading are closed for the day.
**Sarah:** And this is — this is post-2008 austerity working through into a city centre that was already structurally weakened by the loss of the factories. So you're getting two waves at once. The long wave of deindustrialisation that we've talked about, that's been running since the late seventies. And then the short wave of post-2008 retail collapse, which everyone felt but which hit cities like Coventry harder because the consumer base had less slack to absorb it.
**Danny:** Less slack. Yeah. So you've got — by 2017 you've got a city centre where the retail anchor stores from your childhood are gone. Owen Owen long gone. Woolworths gone in 2008. BHS gone in 2016. C&A gone years before. The names that used to be the geographic markers of a Saturday in town — meet me outside Owen Owen, meet me by the Woolworths door — those names are gone, and the buildings they were in are now either empty or doing something completely different.
**Sarah:** And the Brexit vote was eight months earlier.
**Danny:** Brexit was eight months earlier. Coventry voted Leave, fifty-five to forty-five, and that — look, we've talked about the politics of that, I don't want to redo it — but the *mood* in spring 2017 was uncertainty. Article fifty had just been triggered, end of March, two days before the EFL Trophy Final actually. The Prime Minister was — Theresa May was in Downing Street having called the snap election that she would then lose her majority in. The country was in a sort of low-grade rolling crisis that everyone could feel and no one could quite name.
**Sarah:** And Coventry — Coventry being Coventry, Coventry was where you saw it most clearly because Coventry has always been an early-warning city for the rest of the country. Coventry was the first place to feel the seventies industrial decline properly. It was one of the first cities to feel post-2008 retail collapse. It's a — it's a barometer.
**Danny:** It's a barometer. And the football club in spring 2017 was the barometer of the barometer. The thing you could read everything else off, if you knew how to read it. Bottom of League One. Twenty-third. Mathematically gone. Plastic pigs on the pitch. Seven thousand four hundred and sixty-six on a Tuesday. All of that was the city telling you what kind of decade it was having.
**Sarah:** Can I ground this with data, because I think your description is right and I want to put numbers under it. So — in the 2017 indices of multiple deprivation, Coventry was sitting below the national average on six of the seven domains. Income, employment, education, health, crime, living environment — all below the national average. The only domain it was above on was barriers to housing and services, which is mostly a function of being a city with reasonable transport links rather than a sign of health.
**Danny:** Right.
**Sarah:** Real wages in Coventry in 2017 were still below where they'd been in 2008. Nationally that was true, but in Coventry it was *more* true. The percentage point gap was wider. Underemployment — people working fewer hours than they wanted to work — was running noticeably above national.
**Danny:** And the people in those statistics are the people who used to go to the football.
**Sarah:** The factory-worker terrace pipeline we talked about in episode two — those people, or rather their kids, because the actual factory workers are mostly retired or dead by 2017 — their kids are the ones who were either at the Ricoh or, increasingly, weren't, because eighteen pounds for a Tuesday-night League One game against Southend, when you're on a zero-hours contract at a logistics warehouse out on the Coventry side of Lutterworth, is not the same eighteen pounds it was when you were on a Jaguar wage in 1987.
**Danny:** Even leaving aside the political question of whether you want to give SISU your eighteen pounds at all.
**Sarah:** Even leaving aside that, which we've covered. Just on the maths of household budgets, the eighteen pounds in 2017 was a bigger ask than the equivalent ticket money in 1987.
**Danny:** Right. And — and the other thing happening in 2017 that I want to flag, because it's bizarre and important, is the City of Culture bid. Which was *live* in spring 2017. The bid had gone in. The shortlist came out, I think, in the summer. And Coventry won it, in December 2017, against Stoke and Sunderland and a couple of others. UK City of Culture 2021.
**Sarah:** And the timing of that is — the timing is genuinely strange. Because the bid is being put together by the council and the bid team and various civic institutions, and they're writing about Coventry's *reinvention*, Coventry's *creative future*, Coventry's *post-industrial energy* — at the exact moment the football club, which is the most visible civic institution in the city, is sliding into the fourth division for the first time in sixty years.
**Danny:** It's two completely different versions of Coventry, running in parallel, in the same week, on the same pages of the Telegraph.
**Sarah:** The same pages of the Telegraph.
**Danny:** Page four, Coventry City relegated. Page five, City of Culture bid gathering momentum. And both of them are true. And both of them are Coventry.
**Sarah:** Both of them are Coventry. And the thing I keep thinking about is — the people writing the City of Culture bid weren't lying. They weren't doing a — they weren't doing a PR exercise. They genuinely believed in the version of Coventry they were describing. Coventry as a city of reconciliation, the Cathedral, the post-war reconstruction, the Two-Tone heritage, the universities, the diverse population, the creative industries. All of that is real. All of that is true.
**Danny:** And the Tuesday-night attendance figure is also real and also true.
**Sarah:** Also real and also true. And one of the things this show keeps doing, I think, is — keeps refusing to choose between the two. Because the moment you choose, you start lying. The moment you say it's *only* the decline, you're lying. The moment you say it's *only* the reinvention, you're also lying.
**Danny:** And in 1987 — to do the comparator properly — in 1987 the same dual reality existed but in different proportions. 1987 Coventry was a post-industrial city, but the post had really only just started. The factories were still mostly there. The Standard-Triumph site at Canley had gone for car production by 1980 but the buildings were still there, doing other things. Browns Lane was still making Jaguars and would be until 2005. Ryton was still making Peugeots and would be until 2006. The decline was happening — Danny aged nine in 1986 noticed the grown-ups had got quieter, we've talked about this — but the *infrastructure* of the city as a working place was still there. The pubs were still pubs. The precinct still had Owen Owen. The market still did twelve thousand on a Saturday.
**Sarah:** So the city was post-industrial but still functioning.
**Danny:** Post-industrial but still functioning. And 2017 was — 2017 was the version of Coventry where you could see what *not* still functioning looked like in some bits and what *new functioning* looked like in others. JLR design HQ at Whitley, that's there, that's real. Warwick University out at Westwood, growing, expanding, doing well. Coventry University in the city centre, also growing. Those things are real. The new economy is happening. It's just happening in different buildings to where the old economy happened, and the people in the new buildings are mostly not the same people who were in the old buildings.
**Sarah:** Which is the deindustrialisation story in miniature. The new jobs exist. They're just not the *same* jobs, and they're not necessarily for the same people.
**Danny:** Not for the same people. And the football club, structurally, the football club's job in a city like that — historically, in 1987, the football club's job was to be a place where the factory workers and the office workers and the shopkeepers and the kids could all be in the same place for two hours on a Saturday and be one thing.
**Sarah:** One thing.
**Danny:** And by 2017 the football club is — the football club is one of the few places where that's even possible anymore. There aren't many other places in the city where a Warwick lecturer and a logistics worker and a retired Jaguar mechanic are likely to find themselves standing next to each other for the same purpose. Maybe a Two-Tone gig. Maybe the Cathedral on Christmas Eve. Maybe nothing else. So the load on the football club is heavier in 2017 even though the football club is materially weaker.
**Sarah:** And that's the thing the badge is doing, that we talked about in episode one. The badge is doing extra work in 2017 because the other things that used to share the work aren't there anymore.
**Danny:** The factories aren't sharing the work. The shops in the precinct aren't sharing the work. The music scene — there's still a music scene in Coventry, there's a good one, but it doesn't have the city-defining force the Two-Tone scene had. So the badge has to carry it.
**Sarah:** And we asked, didn't we, in episode three, how heavy the badge can be before it breaks.
**Danny:** Yeah.
**Sarah:** And I don't think we have an answer to that. I think — I think the 2016/17 season is the season where the badge got tested the hardest. And it didn't break. People kept wearing it. Seventy-four thousand of them wore it to Wembley. But it was being asked to do a lot.
**Danny:** A lot.
**Sarah:** A lot.
**Danny:** And I want to pull on the City of Culture thing one more time, because there's a thread here that I think connects to the next bit. The City of Culture bid was — among other things — it was a piece of civic reinvention. It was Coventry saying, *we are going to be a different kind of city now*. And there's a long history of Coventry having to do that.
**Sarah:** This is the bit I want to take, actually, if you'll let me, because I've been making notes on it and I think it sits underneath everything we've just said.
**Danny:** Go on.
**Sarah:** So — Coventry as a working city. As a city whose identity is *work*. And specifically as a city whose identity is reinvention. Because Coventry has reinvented itself I would say at least four times in the last hundred and fifty years. It was a ribbon and watch-making city in the nineteenth century. That collapsed. It became a bicycle-making city — Coventry was the centre of British bicycle manufacturing in the 1880s and 1890s, which is a fact people forget. That moved sideways into cars. Coventry became *the* British car city by the 1930s. That peaked in the sixties, declined through the seventies and eighties, was largely gone by the mid-2000s in terms of volume production. And what replaced it, slowly, was — services, logistics, higher education, design, the Jaguar Land Rover R&D operation, the universities, and increasingly creative industries.
**Danny:** Right.
**Sarah:** So you've got — ribbons, bicycles, cars, services. Four iterations of what Coventry is *for*. And each transition has been painful. The ribbon trade collapse in the 1860s caused mass unemployment and emigration. The bicycle-to-car transition was largely smooth but the people who got rich off it were not the same people who'd got rich off bicycles. The car decline from the seventies onwards was a slow-motion catastrophe for an entire generation of skilled workers. And the transition to services and higher education in the 1990s and 2000s — that one's still ongoing, and it's the one that's produced the city we have now, which is a city with two big universities, a JLR design centre, a logistics corridor, an arts scene that punches above its weight, *and* a fourth-tier football team in 2017 mathematically relegated.
**Danny:** All at once.
[VOICE_NOTE: Measured, thoughtful storytelling. Build intensity gradually through the economic parallels. Land the reinvention thesis with clarity and conviction.]
REGISTER: narrative exposition
**Sarah:** All at once. And the thing that makes Coventry — and this is the bit I really want to land — the thing that makes Coventry distinctive as an English city is that *reinvention is the constant*. The thing the city is, fundamentally, is a place that has had to remake itself repeatedly. Not once. Not twice. Four times at least. And there's a kind of — there's a kind of muscle memory in a city that's done that. There's an institutional knowledge about how to be a place that's about to be something different.
**Danny:** And the football club has been a barometer of every one of those transitions.
**Sarah:** A barometer of every one of those transitions. Coventry City was founded in 1883, originally as Singer's FC, named after the bicycle company. So the club is literally a product of the bicycle era. The early professional years are the bicycle-to-car transition era. The post-war period, the Jimmy Hill era, the rise to the First Division — that's the car-industry peak. The thirty-four years in the top flight, 1967 to 2001 — that's the car industry plateauing and then declining, and the club somehow holding on despite it. The three relegations, 2001, 2012, 2017 — that's the car industry being mostly gone and the club losing the structural support of the workforce that filled Highfield Road. And now, the rise back under Robins, in a city that's a logistics and services hub — that's the new economy figuring out whether it can also support a football club, on different terms, with a different supporter base.
**Danny:** And this is where I want to push back on something. Because — yeah, the club has been a barometer. The club has reflected the city's economic state, transition by transition. But I want to argue, and I'm aware this is sentimental, that the relationship doesn't have to flow only one way. The football team should be able to *reinvent the city*, not just be a passive barometer of whether the city is reinventing itself.
**Sarah:** Tell me what you mean.
**Danny:** I mean — look, in 1987, the FA Cup win wasn't a passive reflection of Coventry being a successful industrial city. The factories were already in trouble. Unemployment was fourteen per cent. Ryton was shedding workers, Canley had gone for car production, Browns Lane was rationalising. The cup win came in a city that was already declining. And the cup win *gave the city something*. It gave the city a story to tell about itself in a year when the other stories were mostly bad ones.
**Sarah:** Right.
**Danny:** And what I'm saying is — the football club, in a city like Coventry, has the capacity to do that. To give the city a story when the other stories aren't working. And the 2017 Wembley win, which we're going to do properly next week — the 2017 Wembley win also did that, in its weird, complicated, twelve-days-before-relegation way. It gave the city a story. It gave the city a parade. It gave the city a thing to put in the City of Culture bid documents alongside the Cathedral and the Two-Tone.
**Sarah:** And you're saying the football club is *active* in that.
**Danny:** I'm saying the football club is active in that. The club isn't just a meter dial that goes up and down. The club is — the club is a thing the city *does* together. And the doing of it changes the city.
**Sarah:** I think that's true. I think — I want to be careful about it, because the version where you over-claim it is the version where every grim post-industrial English city pretends its football club is what's going to save it, and that's mostly a lie. The football club can't save Coventry. Coventry has to save Coventry, and it'll do that through universities and design centres and logistics jobs and creative industries and whatever the fifth iteration ends up being.
**Danny:** Yeah, agreed.
**Sarah:** But — but. The football club is one of the places where the city tells itself the story of being a city. And in a place like Coventry, which has had to reinvent itself four times, that story-telling function is structurally important. Maybe more important than it is in cities that haven't had to reinvent.
**Danny:** Right.
**Sarah:** A city like — pick a city — a city like York, which has been a tourist-historical city for two hundred years and isn't going to stop being one, the football club in York is a nice thing the city has. The football club in Coventry is something more than that. Because Coventry has needed the football club to be more than that, repeatedly, across the transitions.
**Danny:** And in 2016/17, the city was asking the football club to be something the football club wasn't structurally able to be. The football club was being asked to be — to be the thing the city could be proud of, the thing the city could rally around, while the football club itself was structurally a mess. Bottom of League One, four managers, ownership crisis, attendance collapse. And the football club, against all the structural odds, managed to deliver something the city could rally around. Briefly. For one afternoon. At Wembley.
**Sarah:** Which is — that is what next week is about.
**Danny:** Which is what next week is about. And the thing I want to take away from this episode, before we land it, is that the people who made that one afternoon possible were the people who'd kept the club going through everything we've described tonight. The seven thousand six hundred and forty-six on the Southend Tuesday. The Sky Blues Trust meeting attendees. The Coventry Twitter accounts at three in the morning. The BBC CWR phone-in callers. The Telegraph letter writers, the modern ones, who'd inherited the form from the 1987 ones. The banner-and-season-ticket people. All of them. They're the reason the seventy-four thousand four hundred and thirty-four was possible.
**Sarah:** They built the floor.
**Danny:** They built the floor. And the floor held. And the team walked across it at Wembley.
[VOICE_NOTE: Reflective and measured. You're both catching your breath after intensity. Warm, almost tender.]
REGISTER: quiet_landing
**Sarah:** [pause] Right.
**Danny:** [pause] I think we're at the end of the heaviest bit.
**Sarah:** I think we are.
**Danny:** I want to do one quick thing before we close, which is — Lee, my mate Lee, the three-in-the-morning voicemail bloke. I mentioned him earlier. I'm just going to flag him into the show now properly, because he's going to be a recurring thing, I suspect. Lee's a Coventry mate, lives over Bedworth way actually, works shifts at a place I'm not going to name because I haven't asked him, leaves me voice notes at unsociable hours when he's been thinking about football. His Wembley question — the would-it-have-been-better-or-worse-if-Coventry-had-been-mid-table one — is going to sit with me into next week, and I'll probably play him a clip back at some point if he doesn't mind.
**Sarah:** Lee, hi.
**Danny:** Lee, if you're listening — hi, mate. Don't send a three a.m. voice note about this episode. Send it in the morning. Like a person.
**Sarah:** [laugh]
**Danny:** And the other thing — and I noticed this when I was checking — we never landed the joke from earlier in the series about Reet Petite being at number one the week of the Bolton tie. A 1957 song, reissued, Jackie Wilson having died in 1984, the country buying back a better-seeming past. I just want to flag — that joke has now done its full circuit, because it's the same structural move that the 2016/17 fans were doing when they wore the vintage Premier League shirts to Swindon away.
**Sarah:** Oh that's nice.
**Danny:** Buying back a better-seeming past. Same impulse, thirty years apart, different objects.
**Sarah:** Different objects, same impulse.
**Danny:** That's the show really, isn't it. Different objects, same impulse.
**Sarah:** That might be the show.
**Danny:** [pause] Right.
**Sarah:** Right.
**Danny:** So — to land this. The episode opened in cold analysis. We had the points-per-game gap to safety. We had the run-in mathematics. We had the moment relegation became unavoidable. We had — we had the confessional bit, which I'm not going to recap because it would defeat the purpose. We had the fan sentiment online stuff. We had the city beyond the stadium. We had Coventry as a working city, reinvention as the constant, the football club as the visible civic institution.
**Sarah:** And we end where we have to end, which is — the supporter base in 2016/17 carried both the banner and the season ticket. Held both objects in both hands. Walked into the ground anyway. Went to Wembley anyway. Came back to the Ricoh anyway. The contradiction never resolved. They just kept walking through it.
**Danny:** Anyway.
**Sarah:** Anyway.
**Danny:** And next week — next week we'll tell you what those people walked into when they got to Wembley. Houchen's diving header in 1987 and Bigirimana reacting first to a loose ball in 2017. Two visitors. Two moments. Same building. Different everything else. Episode seven. Both Wembleys properly.
**Sarah:** The episode this one earns.
**Danny:** The episode this one earns. And I'll add — because I think it's honest to say it — the thesis we opened with tonight. That in both 1987 and 2017 Coventry beat unfashionable opponents at Wembley with goals from unfashionable midfielders, but only one of those wins meant the squad knew what it was — the other was a squad pretending, for ninety minutes, to be a different team than the one that would be relegated. I think we have now done the work that lets that thesis land next week. The work was tonight. Tonight was the work.
**Sarah:** Tonight was the work.
[VOICE_NOTE: Warm, grateful, slightly tired. Slow the pace—let each sentence breathe. This is a gentle goodbye.]
[REGISTER: warm]
**Danny:** [pause] All right. Before we go — credits. Data for tonight's episode came from The Guardian's archive, from Wikipedia, and from Perplexity AI. The show is hosted on Microsoft Azure. Our AI pipeline runs with support from the Google Founder Programme. Show notes, transcripts, full episode archive — skybluetimemachine.com. That's where everything lives.
**Sarah:** Thanks for listening through a heavy one. We know.
**Danny:** We know. Be kind to yourselves this week. Talk to you next week, for Wembley.
**Sarah:** For Wembley.
**Danny:** Anyway.