Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Commentary on the human condition — metaphysics, freedom, and the bigger picture nobody's talking about. Beth uses physics to build a case for God, breaks down what's really happening in AI and geopolitics, and connects the dots most people miss. Unscripted. Raw. Paradoxically nuanced. Subscribe or keep living in a low-resolution simulation.
Welcome to Quantum Bombs, a commentary show where we talk about the human condition.
Oh yes, what is it like to be human through metaphysics and freedom?
And today we are diving deep into the freedom aspect of this.
And if I do my job right, I will land us right at metaphysics in the end.
It is a whopper of a show because most of you miss this because we just bombed Iran
and it got buried.
But don't worry, no matter when you listen to this episode, it is relative because it's
going to be the thorn in our side for as long as we are going to be around and living.
There's no escaping this big topic that we're talking about.
And it is just based on one simple tweet that President Trump put out.
But I am going to it is so much bigger than that.
It entails it entails so much juicy goffs up and beef, how we live our lives.
I'm going to give us a 500 foot view of it and the stakes couldn't be any higher, guys.
It is about mass surveillance, AI safety in a time where AI is now operating our weapons of war.
Who's in the Cool Man's Club?
Who's getting these $200 million contracts for the AI companies?
And I think just to start, I'm going to go over like three quick things about
what we could be thinking on through the episode.
OK, so play along with me.
You know, when you're you've heard the expression, you know, you can't see the
forest for the trees, you're too deep in it.
You can't see out of it.
You've got the love goggles on, guys.
Have you ever dated anybody?
We're all your friends and family kind of can see the obvious, but you can't.
And then looking back 10 years later, you're not together and you're like, yeah.
Maybe that's what I'm trying to figure out is part of the problem of what we're
going to discuss today.
The other thing we're going to discuss is so easily passed over, I'm guilty of it
too, because my privacy, my data, my autonomy, my get off the F off of my
property is so I never really think about it too often because I don't I'm not
a crazy person.
I don't have too much to hide.
So we often just glaze over what it means to have your own privacy, to have
the government out of your business.
But yet I know as a Texan, a libertarian, thankfully, I'm kind of rather old.
Can, you know, I don't know.
I get, yeah, you could say a midlife, I'm midlifing it.
But the younger folks don't know this across the world and all these other
countries, especially they don't know this.
We just give up our autonomy.
We just do all these dumb, sheeple things.
We don't even use cash anymore.
We're completely walking and marching ourselves into this, you know, this idea
of when someone needs something from you, the fact that it just goes right over
our heads, no one really thinks twice about, well, why do you need that?
Is it even right that you're asking me that or those types of thoughts
in regards to our mass surveillance, we have our fourth amendment.
I know that Americans, we don't really know past the first and the second, but
our fourth amendment is regarding searches and seizures.
No one has the right to just look through your data or your phone.
Your house, et cetera.
The third amendment, which also no one knows.
I've learned just doing this episode.
Actually, I can't give myself a gold star.
It is pretty much irrelevant to today's times because it's about back when the
British shoulders forced themselves to live with Americans during the war.
It basically says you don't have to house soldiers, but today in modern times,
what it means, if we had interpreted in modern times, it's that my property
matters and my privacy in my own home matters and my docile matters.
And then later through courts, they determined that even if you aren't the
owner of the house, but you're renting the house, what's in there, your life,
your privacy, you have a right to it.
In 1967, going back down to the fourth amendment, there was a case,
Katz versus the USA, and it, there wasn't before this time, the word privacy
written into our fourth amendment.
So however, the ruling was is that, and I want y'all to remember these words
because I read them and I thought this, this is, this is it.
The words Americans have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
That is what makes us different from the rest of the world.
That is kind of how I grew up.
And so I get so annoyed when I just, you see all this invasion of, of, of
privacy, as the, the English say it, of privacy and no one ever questions it.
Most people don't know that the line is being crossed.
The government has no right to ask me barely anything.
You definitely can't drive on my property.
Any Texan knows the most powerful person in the law is actually the Game Warden
because they can drive on your property.
But the only thing I owe the government is April 15th.
I will send you my taxes.
And for those of us less organized, less prioritized, October the 15th.
But other than that, that's all the government needs to do in our lives.
I've got this book here and it's, um, atrocities by Matthew White, the
hundred deadliest episodes in human history.
This book, I will show it to you on almost all, a lot of my episodes.
Okay.
Because it reminds me that there is no point in having the government in my life.
I guess what people don't, you got to pick up on that, what happened, that book
is that the government's usually the ones killing the people.
Okay.
And the last thing, let's jump into the topic.
The third thing we're going to like try to just wrap our brain around is what
makes this so different, this tweet that I'm fixing to reveal to y'all.
We've always had defense contractors, Northrop, Brumman, Lockheed Martin,
Boeing, all these cool, sexy people that we just print money into existence.
And all of our tax dollars goes to funding these forever wars.
We've always paid them to design us weapons of mass destructions, weapons
that can kill immensely.
So how is this any different?
This is kind of Donald Trump's point.
I am ordering something from you and you must give it to me.
What makes this different?
I think, I don't know.
This is for us to weigh out in this episode is that the, the weapons
before took a human being to touch the button and make it go pew, pew, right?
You could argue that we had smart weapons and it was a little bit autonomous.
It had its own free will.
It calculated some zeros and ones on where to go to, but it still had a human
go hit the little button, whereas now with AI, we are having it's autonomous.
And it is a robot or a program, whatever, how you ever want to see it.
That is now operating these weapons or are they not?
That's the whole point of the pushback and the episode today.
So in 2025, our Pentagon, the department of war, contracted four different
AI companies, each getting a contract for $200 million for their AI.
Those companies are Google deep seek, um, Jachi BT's open AI, Anthropics,
Claude and X AI by, um, Grocker by X and each one performs its own different
function, but Claude is the one that Palantir has spent the most investment
in equity in putting Claude as its main operating system.
So how did we even get into this debacle where we've got this tweet
happening that we're fixing to get to here?
Do you remember when we went down south and we were the American
heroes and I cried, I hope y'all cried or at least your heart was happy.
We went down to Venezuela and we nabbed the dictator Maduro.
It was a quite a feat for, for military, anything.
I mean, you know, everybody was impressed, especially if you
kept up with the kind of the technology they used.
Well, that got people thinking like Anthropic, the company that we will
be diving into today and they called up Palantir and they're like, Hey,
when you captured Maduro, did you use our stuff?
And Palantir was like, well, yeah, we did.
Why?
And that right there, ladies and gentlemen, has birthed the debacle, though.
Why?
And how dare you call and ask just to kind of make this really
clear for the rest of the episode.
What the AI companies are offering is the brain.
Palantir is this devilish company that we're giving up all of our
freedoms to, to run our, our mass surveillance systems.
It's basically software that our government has contracted and it will be
running a lot of our defense systems and mass surveillance systems.
They'll call them data programs and the brain in that software is from AI
companies that we will be talking about today.
Okay.
So this has been framed in many different ways in the media.
The left would say this is about AI safety.
And then you have Trump and Elon Musk calling anthropic left wing nut jobs.
And then you have other people looking at what anthropic CEO Dario said, as maybe
he is a patriot, similar to Edward Snowden.
He is saying some really heavy stuff that we should be paying attention to.
Or is it just a game of the good old boys club, the billionaires club?
Of those people always win.
And that is why they're left wing nut jobs.
We're going to learn today.
Actually what makes somebody in AI company, a left wing nut job.
Since I've seen so many of us just kind of chiming in on Twitter and not really
knowing what this tweet was really about to paint the picture about safety in AI.
I thought nothing better than to show you this cool clip from a short film.
It's eight minutes long, but we're going to watch the two minute trailer.
It's called slaughter bots.
So for those of you that don't have the imagination of why surveillance and
weapons of war go hand in hand, I want this to kind of illustrate it for you.
I think it will do you well.
It's just too short.
It's directed us 3000 precision strikes last year.
We're super proud of it.
It allows you to separate the bad guys from the good.
It's a big deal, but we have something much bigger.
Your kids probably have one of these, right?
Not quite.
Its processor can react a hundred times faster than a human.
And just like your phones and social media apps, it does facial recognition.
Inside here is three grams of shaped explode.
They can penetrate buildings, cars, trains, evade people, bullets, pretty much.
Any countermeasure, just characterize him, release the swarm, rest easy.
You can see high windows, very small, precisely punctured to gain entry to the building.
A 25 million dollar order now buys this.
Enough to kill half a city.
Some legislation would be useless against the so-called slaughter bots.
As to stay away from crowds.
We are thinking big.
They cannot be stopped.
When you can find your enemy using data, even by a hashtag, you can target the evil ideology right where it starts.
Wow, well, if you want to watch the full eight minute thing, it's much better.
That is the example of no human in the loop.
They're going to let go of a swarm of 30,000 of those little tiny bees and let them handle business based on whatever their program to do.
OK, so let's get into the mix of the drama.
Let's do Trump's tweet first.
Now, I want to frame how this is being seen.
I'm just going to read it from somebody random on the internet.
Posted Dario Amodi, CEO of Anthropic, is a far leftist.
He supports to he supports to the left.
Anthropic would push the woke agenda.
If a leftist says they want to be political, you shouldn't believe them.
I think he miswrote that or I'm misreading it.
Woke is their religion.
Trump ending anthropic from the government is great for America.
Well, you know what, guys, we're going to find out what makes Anthropic woke.
I'm actually, OK, I'm a little bit biased.
I will admit.
I pay Claude the most.
Claude is the their form of chat, GPT and LLM.
I pay for grok, chat, GPT and anthropic Claude.
Claude is my favorite and they get most of my money each month.
This is a long tweet because as Trump writes, he's long.
But yet it there's a lot to unpack here.
So I'm going to read the full dang thing to you guys.
The United States of America will never allow a radical left woke
company to dictate how our great military fights and wins wars.
That decision belongs to your commander-in-chief and the tremendous
leaders I appoint to run our military.
The left wing nutjobs at Landthropic have made a disastrous mistake
trying to strong arm the Department of War and force them to obey
their terms of service instead of our Constitution.
Their selfishness is putting American lives at risk.
Our troops in danger and our national security and jeopardy.
Therefore, I am directing every federal agency in the United States
government to immediately cease all use of anthropics technology.
We don't need it.
We don't want it and will not do business with them again.
There will be a six month phase out period for the agencies like the
Department of War who are using anthropics products at various levels.
Anthropic is anthropic better get their act together and be helpful
during the phase out period, or I will use the full power of the presidency
to make them comply with the major civil and criminal consequences to follow.
We decide, sorry, we will decide the fate of our country, not some out of
the control radical left AI company run by people who have no idea
what the real world is all about.
Thank you for attention to this matter.
Make America great again.
Wow, that's a lot to unpack.
Now, what caused President Trump to push back?
I'm going to tell you there's two reasons.
Why?
Number one, no mass domestic surveillance of Americans.
Anthropic refused to let Claude be used to track, monitor or surveil
U.S. citizens at scale.
Number two, no fully autonomous lethal weapons.
Anthropic refused to let Claude be used in weapon systems that can
kill without a human in the loop.
Okay.
And then the government's response.
Again, you kind of heard Donald Trump making his case.
I want everything he says, right?
Like I want to be safe.
I want to follow our constitution.
But is it really that or is it kind of not that the government's short
response, why this is dangerous?
The Pentagon's position is simple.
The DOD insisted on all lawful purposes standard.
Trust us, we'll follow the law, just get out of our way.
A Pentagon person said, a Modi is a liar with a God complex who wants
nothing more than to person, than personally control the U.S.
military and is okay, putting our nation's safety at risk.
This all sounds like legit, right?
Like I'm totally down.
Dude, get this crazy guy out of here.
I want to feel safe.
But when you look at it, it's kind of like not.
Okay.
Somebody asked the, the, um, again, the government to further explain
themselves and they gave an analogy and I want to read it to you.
A senior defense official posted a hypothetical to a Modi during a December
phone call, what if a nuclear armed ICBM were hurling toward the U.S.
without 90 seconds to spare and anthropic AI were the only way to trigger
a missile response, but the company safeguards wouldn't allow it.
According to the Pentagon version, a Modi's answer was essentially,
you could call us and we'd figure it out.
That enraged the Pentagon leaders.
Anthropic denied that account.
They called it patently false and said the company has already agreed
to allow Claude for their missile de-system.
So who do we trust?
What do we believe?
I want to show another book because normally I'm not an expert.
At missile, the, you know, nuclear stuff, but I am 60% of the way to
a through this book.
If you ever want to know anything about nuclear war, this is it.
This is the latest book with all of the players, the, every single ounce
that can be weighed, minute that can be measured and player in the game is in this
book.
And, um, I could definitely say, yeah, there's nuclear war is a, actually a
war that has handled in under three minutes, period, no matter what country
you're dealing with.
So yeah, to the, to their point, they have no time to call someone.
Um, however, I don't know.
This seems a little bit too convenient for the US government to be saying that.
And then he's saying that wasn't the case at all.
Now, what's also alarming about President Trump's tweet is the speed at how
this happened and unfolded.
So I think we're going to go first through the speed of it and then the punishment.
Let's just back up all four AI companies signed a $200 million contract
with the Pentagon last year, but now post, um, post Venezuela questioning
on like who's, who's AI are you using or what are you doing with it?
It looks like they're making some amendments and further detail into their
classified systems.
So XAI, um, signed a deal on February 23rd and basically just said, yeah,
dude, just follow the law and we're cool with it.
On February 24th, this is Tuesday.
Pete Hegseth pushed a Modi to hurry up and sign the deadline is Friday.
So on Thursday, they came back with their two red line items that we just went
through on Friday, the hammer drops.
Trump orders all agencies to stop using anthropics.
Hegseth designates them a supply and chain risk contract killed their
$200 million contract on Saturday.
Open AI announces it has reached a deal with the Pentagon for classified
use, Altman, Sam Altman, amidst the negotiations were definitely rushed.
So basically he went in there, dropped anthropic, called up Chachi BT company,
open AI, and was like, Hey, can you do this?
Now, what makes a Modi not look crazy is that Sam Altman didn't just go
into this going, yes, I'll do whatever like Elon kind of did.
He said, I kind of agree with their two red lines.
I kind of want what they have.
But a Modi was asking for liking contracts was specific language regarding
specific things.
So you have Elon saying, absolutely, just stay within the reins of the law.
You had anthropic saying, I want specific language.
And then you have open AI come in Sam Altman and like, well, I ain't gonna lie.
I kind of agree with that prior company.
And they're like, all right, all right.
Well, what if we, you know, give you, we're going to stay within the law.
And we're going to kind of like, let's see, what does it say?
Open AI amends its deal to add stronger language against domestic
surveillance after public backlash.
So they got the deal that anthropic couldn't get, but it's not exactly
written in the same language.
So it's in between what Elon got and what anthropic was pushing for,
which is kind of important, the punishment.
So for pushing back.
This is the punishment anthropic got Trump ordered the federal agencies to
admittedly cease using anthropics technology.
Though, if we remember back in the tweet, it said, well, we have six months
to phase it out.
Anthropics Claude was the operating system that he used the very next day.
Cause this is on Friday.
Let's see.
Yeah.
Saturday, we brokered the deal with Sam Altman, all during the chaos of Iran
being bombed.
Wow, that's a lot happening.
If you think about it, while we're bombing Iran, we were
using Claude in Palantir's software.
So Claude was the brain and the genius that helped us create another great
military win, something that again, should bring you and a lot of brought
myself so much joy, so much astonishment for the, the wonderful Iranians.
Anyways, Hexeth designated anthropic a supply chain risk, a classification
normally reserved for companies connected to foreign adversaries.
The Pentagon canceled anthropics, $200 million contract.
As we know, Hexeth announced that no contractor, supplier or partner doing
business with the U S military may conduct business with the anthropic.
Do you know how messed up that is?
That it's like so bad.
It's just like wrong on every level.
Like we're going to break up with you, but we're also going to make everybody
else break up with you.
It's honestly, it's childish.
Okay.
The Pentagon threatened to invoke, this is the worst, the Defense
Production Act to force an anthropic to hand over its technology, a Cold War
era law that would basically let the government seize their AI.
Anthropics said it was deeply sat in, called the designation legally
unsound and vowed to fight it in court.
You know, I think it's important.
I want to play Sam Altman's from open AI, his response to exactly that.
He backed up anthropic.
Listen to homeboys.
I don't personally think the Pentagon should be threatening DPA against these
companies for all the differences I have with anthropic.
I mostly trust them as a company.
And I think they really do care about safety.
And I've been happy that they've been supporting our warfighters.
I don't personally.
So that is him right there saying, I agree with anthropic and definitely don't
want the DPA being thrown at any AI company.
It's setting such an early precedence.
I mean, we're just beginning to use AI from a historical standpoint.
And I mean, I have to admit, this is so unlikeable of Trump to do.
And I think it's because maybe he's so far in this and he doesn't think
that the average human being can understand, follow or listen and see it for what it is.
Like I hate playing bipartisan politics.
I'm kind of surprised the, the left, here's the problem.
The left calls Donald Trump a tyrannical dictator all the time.
So when he actually does something that kind of feels
dictatorial and tyrannical by punishing a person he hired to perform a product,
punishment in this regard, he actually could be assessed that way,
but they've cried Wolf way too many times.
So this is why I don't even think they've said anything.
If they did, it doesn't matter because nobody is listening to them.
Everybody's been calling him that.
So this is the perfect example of crying Wolf and no one's paying attention.
Hopefully we will hold him accountable on his feet to the fire.
We'll step up, especially for our future with Vance and Marco Rubio,
whoever makes sees the presidency at that time.
First off, this person who posted this.
Yeah, I forgot to mention how cheesy he looks.
They found like the most cheesiest picture of the CEO, Dario Amodi.
They could possibly find, but I just want you all to hear him in his own words
on this one little thing you could care.
You could see he cares about safety, but I don't know.
We haven't figured out how woke he is yet.
If you had a moment with the president right now tonight, what would you say to him?
You know, I again, I would say we are patriotic Americans.
We have done everything we have done has been for the sake of this country,
for the sake of supporting US national security.
Our leaning forward in deploying our models with the military was done
because we believe in this country.
We believe in defeating our autocratic adversaries.
We believe in defending America.
The red lines we have drawn, we drew because we believe that crossing
those red lines is contrary to American values.
And we wanted to stand up for American values.
And when we were threatened with supply chain designation and Defense
Production Act, which are unprecedented intrusions into the private economy
by the government, we exercised our classic First Amendment rights to speak up
and disagree with the government.
Disagreeing with the government is the most American thing in the world.
And we are patriots in everything we have done here.
We have stood up for the values of this country.
OK, I think something that we need to mention regarding AI and weaponry
is this is a Western problem.
He had said it like America.
This is only happening in the West.
So China and Russia are building their AI systems and and they don't have any pushback.
The state is is is everything that exists there.
So Chinese people are building AI for the state, but the state is building it.
There is no private sector where we are private citizens with rights that
implore, you know, our being puts forth a government.
The government works for us.
So I like that he's pushing back.
I like that we have this Western privilege of we're making a commercial product.
The government is going to use it.
And now we have to decide how it's going to fit together.
And I have to say, as a libertarian and someone that typically sides with the
conservative mindset, it isn't right that Trump is pushing so hard on the private
side. No, no, actually, he could push back on the private sector.
But what's scary is that he's willing to punish them for their pushback in safety.
Next, I want to bring us now into the beef and we be beefed.
OK, so let's go through kind of the timeline of all the players because the
backstory is pretty interesting in regards to because my question on all of this
is why do they hate this guy so much?
And then to get to that question of why do they hate the guy so much?
You got to understand the backstory of AI.
So we be beef and I've got all the major players.
Ironically, this picture is not accurate at all.
And that made this even more ironic because I asked Grock to make me a picture
with certain people like Larry Page for DeepSeek Google, and he gave me some
random person and Anthropics logo is not perfect nor close, nor is that Dario on
there, but I don't care because this is the best I could do with AI and where
we're at in 2026.
This is why movies are not made with AI yet because the.
Well, the accuracy and the consistency are basically not there yet, but we're
close in 2013.
Elon has a birthday and he was friends with Larry Page at Google, which
Google at the time was about 70 to 90 percent of our AI was being built by
Google and he said some mean things to Elon.
Elon had something about AI and he expressed that humans have consciousness
and that should be relished and preserved.
And Larry Page looked at him and called him a speciest.
Well, that Elon swore off their friendship after that.
In 2014, Google buys DeepMind and Elon panics panic.
In 2015, Elon and Sam Altman meet up along with some other tech bros for
dinners, like 10 rich tech bros, and they're like, we need to do something
that is basically the we want to build a company.
We're going to make it the opposite of what Google AI's company is doing,
because I really think that AI safety is should be that we're either going
to kill ourselves or we're going to do it right, right?
So they set out to make it different in two different ways.
They're not going to be for profit and it's going to be open to the world.
So everyone can benefit and see and watch how safe it is.
And that is why open AI was born in 2015.
Elon pledged $1 billion to help get it going.
And they poached really big talent from, from Google as well.
So they've had some, some brainiacs in the mix.
From what I understand, it kind of ran out of an apartment.
Sam Altman, Elon wasn't there.
They were taking care of their companies, but it was a group of dudes
that were the best in their business to start building open AI.
Actually, I'm going to jump over to a clip right now.
Speaking of 2015, Elon Musk, not saying he's any different from today,
or maybe that's what we're here questioning and just, you know,
just show you where he was at this point in time.
He was concerned about the lack of safety precautions around AI,
which he felt post an existential threat to humanity.
I don't think most people understand just how quickly machine intelligence is advancing.
I try to convince people to slow down, slow down AI, to regulate AI.
This was futile.
At this point in 2015, Google was the undisputed leader.
OK, so I mean, I just love looking back at him and I still do today,
but it is a we're at a different pace now with AI.
OK, so let's get back.
We've just formed open AI.
We've got some talent. It's 2018.
Things are evolving slowly.
Elon, being the visionary he is, he sets out and he says,
and I'm oversimplifying what took a long time to happen.
And Elon says it went down a little bit differently,
but this is kind of what it was.
Hey, yo, I want open AI to merge with Tesla and I want to be the CEO.
And then time goes by, the board votes in Sam Altman.
The rest is history.
So now Elon leaves and this is important.
He takes most, if not all of the money with him.
Remember, he pledged a billion dollars to be their investment source.
Well, now that money is gone, which is very important.
Why in 2019 open AI then turns into a for-profit company
and they did a deal with Microsoft,
which means, who we going to be in the money, the money, we end the money.
The way to think of it when we're going to jump now to 2022.
Sam Altman posted on on X. Hey, here's chat GPT.
This is the larger language model you're familiar with now.
They didn't really know how big it was going to be.
I think they took like a vote in the office.
How many people do you think is going to use it?
And the highest vote, I believe they bet,
would be 100,000 people might use it.
This tweet right here, Sam Altman, November 2022.
Today, we launched chat GPT, try talking with it here.
And he posts the link.
It's very simple.
It's very low key.
So after they posted it, they hit 100 million users.
And the first, I think it was week.
And to put that into context,
Facebook took four months to hit that many users.
Now we're in 2021.
Dario Modi, the CEO of Anthropic, he and some key safety people.
So you've got your computer nerds and your safety nerds.
They both worked together at these AI companies.
They were like, this is not looking good at open AI.
And so about eight to 10 key employees left AI to form Anthropic.
So the very reason that Elon left his friendship with Larry Page
and Google is the same reason that Dario Modi is leaving open AI
and Sam Altman in the dust to make a, you could say, more secure, better AI.
In 2023, Elon launches X AI to compete with both of these companies.
OK, so now they're both his arch nemesis for oversimplification.
He sues open AI for $134 billion and says it shouldn't be called open AI.
It should be called closed AI because we all know that once you turn for profit,
this is no longer open sourced.
You're making money on it and it's proprietary.
Part of his lawsuit is basically saying when I was partnering this up with you,
it was a for a nonprofit, but now that you're going to be profiting,
I'm owed some of that money.
They later hit back and said, in short, we found some correspondence
that indicates that you were open to turning this into a for profit company
when discussed, then he later fires back and that puts us into today
where they're going to litigation over $134 billion.
That's a lot of cheese.
That's like three or four times what he paid for Twitter.
They're going to court in April.
So we can watch this kind of hash out.
Now you'll know what's up to date when you see this in the news
coming up in one month from now.
Okay, so now we're here in July 25.
I've already told you in July, we have set forth these four companies
to run our AI systems.
We're now back to where we are today, where anthropic is getting blacklisted.
XAI signs this deal, eyes closed, doesn't have any guardrails.
Just follow the law boys.
Open AI rushes in to take up the slack that anthropic drops.
The irony is, is that Elon, who started the AI safety movement,
now owns the company with the least amount of safety in place.
Maybe I'm trying to be, I'm not trying to over simplify things just for
the sake of making a show and a thesis.
And this is what I meant by when you're dating someone and you can't
really see them for who they are, or when you're so deep into a project,
you can't really see its creativeness or what's too much and what's too little
and how many more polishes does it need.
You can't see the force for the trees.
I'd like, I mean, I'm a massive Elon fan.
I'd like to think that that same concerned guy in 2015 is the same guy today.
But man, there's been so much happening.
Y'all remember the Trump and Elon bromance and, you know, maybe I like to
see that there's a willingness to please in him since they had the fall and he
made those stupid comments about him, you know, and when I mean willing to
please meaning willing to go along with the Pentagon without saying, Hey,
well, hold on, let's think about this first.
Like, do you, should I allow you guys to do all of this without any of our
companies say so, any of our private companies, you know, allowance to do this?
I mean, imagine guys think of the slaughterbots, right?
Once they're loose, you've got these little tiny bees that can just mass kill
anybody.
What if they get hacked?
Anyways, the what ifs is not for this episode.
All right.
So, I mean, the point is, is that, is this a billion dollars club?
Like, I guess I should put, so before Trump came out with these tweets about
this woke ism, which now we're going to get to the bottom of, he, he basically
sounded like he was repeating Elon Musk tweets by calling them left wing nut
jobs.
Elon has, has not obviously held back in his feelings of how these companies,
how he feels about these companies.
And then it kind of seems like Trump just so quickly turned on them with, I
thought was reasonable pushback.
So now we're going to, let me get you on here.
Let's play with croc.
And then we're going to play with some other of these companies to make sure
we're not getting a biased opinion.
All right.
It says, what makes a company woke regarding a woke AI company, say like
anthropic?
This is going to be interesting because like, when I first started working on
this episode, making it with Claude, Claude is like, well, hold on.
I got a full disclosure here.
Let you know, this is me.
You know, I'm making a, I'm, so I'm, of course, I'm going to be
biased in your, your analysis of this TLTR in short.
Anthropic gets called woke primarily in right leaning circles due to its AI
safety ethic stance, clashing with certain government military demands plus
perceptions of model bias.
However, it's not a classic woke corporation in vain of heavy
public DEI campaigning or progressive activism, like some consumer brands.
It's more about safety guard rails and neutrality debates in AI.
The label often depends on who's applying it and what context.
Well, thank you.
So there we are from the enemy itself, grok, the enemy of anthropic.
I joke owned by, uh, by Elon and talking about this is it.
This is the answer that the guy that posted that Trump, we don't need
no lift wing running our AI.
Yeah, this is coming from the other side of the aisle.
So I don't have to go back to the other people and ask them what they would say.
This is already saying it is that he's not woke in regards to transing
your children secretly via their AI weapon system, which I don't even
see how it's possible.
They're woke simply by putting in safety guard rails.
Now, do I want them to be able to fire a missile back?
Absolutely.
But when it comes to these autonomous having some human, no, we could all
just say right now, having some humans in the loop has worked for us just, just fine.
In fact, our nuclear system, the football, all of that is very archaic.
I would feel probably better if we don't move AI into the loop of, of how
our nukes work in the world.
All right, let's see.
What else do we got here today?
Oh gosh, we got to close it with our hero, Edward Snowden.
How could I forget?
We got me some Snowden, Snowden, Snowden.
Okay, guys, it's important to note Edward Snowden.
In case you haven't know who he is, go watch his movie.
It's called Snowden.
After nine 11, the George Bush administration put up the Patriot Act to
keep us safe against terrorism, right?
So that enabled our government to do all kinds of digging into our lives.
But then he blew the whistle and told us they're not, they're not just doing
this for terrorism.
They're like looking in on everyday people.
He figured all this out because he was a, he was a contractor for the NSA and
he was working there from 2009 to 2013.
He was going to Hong Kong to tell a journalist his story.
And he did, as you see in the movie.
And his passport on the way home while he was laid over in Moscow, Russia was
canceled because the United States said they say he was charged with espionage.
Okay.
And still till this day, guys, he has never left country of Russia all
because he blew the whistle.
He cared more about upholding our constitution and being a patriot.
And still till this day, not even President Trump has chose to pardon him.
Many of our prior presidents, if not all of them have tried to get him back to
American soil to forever jail him.
There's even people in our military in office today that'll call him a traitor.
Let's go over what he exposed to us guys.
The big programs he exposed prism NSA had a direct access to the servers of
Google, Facebook, Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo and Skype.
This is really dating us with Yahoo and all those.
They could read your emails, see your photos and watch your video checks.
Bulk phone metadata collection, Verizon and other carriers were forced by
secret court orders to hand over your phone records.
Any call you made by the millions, who call, who you called when you called and
for how long X key score described as NSA's Google.
There was an analyst could search through the virtually anyone's
intern internet activity, emails, browsing history chats without a warrant.
The NSA's stated internal goal was literally collected all process at all,
exploited all know it all.
Now where that lands us today is that the courts later came back and said, okay,
yeah, we were wrong.
We were doing that all because we said it's legal, but turns out some of it wasn't
legal specifically dealing with the phone records.
So our government was actually having to admit that it broke some rules.
But the point of how that is the parallel of exactly what's going on today with AI
is they're saying, yeah, just stay within the law.
But clearly past presidents shows they don't stay within the law.
They even said it was for terrorism, but really they did it with everyday people.
And now let's see, we're doing it for our safety.
Ironically, still they would even say for terrorism, but oh my goodness,
it's so much more.
And so how does that look now?
Cause remember we had dated crap like Yahoo on there.
How does this look now in 2026?
What does Palantir have on you or are they making and are they doing it?
And yes, unfortunately, when Donald Trump came into office in 2025, one of those
beautiful executive orders he signed on the second day of his presidency had
something to do with mass data collection.
And I'm going to do my best to get it out here for you.
Trump signed an executive order instructing government agencies to share
data with each other and enlisted Palantir to carry it out.
While we're here, let's just go back to Watergate with Nixon.
What they found and ruled after that, what they did illegal in Watergate was
they used the IRS records to then talk crap about political enemies.
And that's when they said, and they made a rule.
So we know this is already law.
You can't cross databases system in the government because you could use
it in, in instances like this, right?
Well, now fast forward to this being signed Palantir and play.
The database could, would combine tax filings, student debt, social security,
bank accounts, medical claims and immigration status.
No previous system has ever centralized this much personal info.
Across federal agencies.
How did it begin?
It started unfortunately with Doge, the department of government efficiency.
My favorite thing that we have ever done yet this fourth and the sad news is guys
is Doge is no longer around.
What I mean by that is there's no one employed in that branch that's actually
working on government efficiency, ironically.
So what is it directly ahead right now?
Let me just break this down on how the database will look in the future.
You're going to start hearing these direct words, digital grid, but I'm
talking internationally and it's implemented in three ways.
And this is going to happen.
Unfortunately, again, in all, all the countries, you could argue the United States.
No, we wouldn't do that.
No, what do you think Palantir is doing?
So these things directly are all three things that Palantir is setting up for
our digital grid throughout the globe.
One is you're going to be your digital ID.
How we're going to do that in the United States, even though I myself didn't
believe it until I saw it break broken down to me piece by piece is we already
have to have our facial scans for our banks or the fingerprint that will be
implemented across all things that we're already using.
It'll pretty much be impossible to survive without having this scanning going on.
And it's kind of, you could see how it makes sense because with scammers and AI,
it's kind of like, well, yeah, you do need that.
Like I'm telling you, have y'all noticed how much worse the scamming has gotten?
Like more intricate, better links from inside the companies, et cetera.
Okay.
The second part is the currency.
So the digital currency, we're going to start creating money that, let's say
they put it into your name and they can put an expiration date on that money.
They can even say where and how you spend that money.
So they're controlling where your doll, your, your actual assets will be going
and your assets could be taken away, depending upon who you believe.
That's what I'm saying.
Like who's going to be in power in the future?
Because you may be on the wrong side of history and poof.
So many people have already been debanked and deplatformed.
This is 100% already happening.
And then the third thing is think physical hardware, think cameras, think 15 minute
cities use heart.
You've heard it, but it's not coming here to America.
Oh yeah.
88 cities are already signed up to which are in Texas.
One is already implemented in the UK as we speak right now.
Oxford and England has been divided into six different sections.
They're fixing to roll it out like they've already done it.
And now they're implementing it.
Six different sections.
I think you get 100 day passes where you could leave your little 15 minute,
one sixth section of the city and travel on either outside the city completely
or to the other side of town dystopic.
It's funny because they don't even have to say it's for green purposes.
They could just say because we want to, because like I told you,
we're sheeple just marching straight into this.
No one is protesting.
We're busy protesting on the right.
Silly things that are like cyclical coming in and out like Israel and Iran.
On the left, they're busy protesting 80, 20 issues, meaning they're protesting
for things that only 20% of the population even agrees upon.
And usually that 20% is for the rights of people that are typically like 1%.
Okay.
So let me park this puppy and bring you all the way home and I will bring you home.
The person who's the president or the powers that be across the world,
we may or may not like them.
That is completely out of our control.
We're putting zero guard rules up for AI safety.
We're walking all over the fourth amendment who cares about what happened in
Watergate.
So where does this land is metaphysically?
I promised you I would bring it to you as a physically and I'm going to give it
to you.
Easy to understand for me at least, because I've been working on this for about
a year and a half is a three part documentary series.
I've been working on to release on television.
It's called spirit of the bomb and I'm making a case for a creation and
annihilation through energy.
So it's been quite an interesting walk, but it, I can't help but think of the
thesis of my three part documentary is basically what I've been describing to
you and I'm going to read it to you.
Here you go.
If, you know, for those that can't see the screen, our technological evolution
has outpaced our emotional and spiritual evolution.
We are in a dangerous phase, medieval minds armed with modern capacities,
a perfect recipe for extinction.
Oh man.
So let that kind of sink in.
That's what I've been describing to you.
Our technological stuff has outpaced where we are in the human consciousness.
And the easiest way to describe it is there's always two central things
that everything operates on.
Fear and love, two basic human emotions.
But you could pull down all your emotions, go into one of those
accounts, camps, it, it even operates that like on a, on a metaphysical level,
all the little subatomic particles are operating off an expansion or, or
contraction, a zero or a one.
A fear or a love, everything is listening.
All of things are being programmed and put into the probabilistic virtual reality
that we're living in, as what are you looking for?
What is it?
What is the, that's why people say, what is your vibe?
What is the vibration you're putting out of fear or love, scarcity or
abundance?
And I think it's easy to understand. This is the first time in history, if you look at it from an anthropological lens, that we as human beings are living without one fundamental truth that humans have always lived with throughout all of the study of mankind.
What do you think that is? So we're in post-modernity. I can't say the word post-modernity right now. We remove spirit from science. We remove spirit from our everyday lives in the 1900s.
We thought we were too good for it. Spirit can't really be real right? We're too good for it. That's what for the medieval ages when they did weird alchemy and stuff, they didn't have it right? We know, our physicists know, we know way better and we remove the fundamental truth of how all of this comes together and wonder why nothing is physically working out and how things don't make sense.
There are a couple people who do know though the fundamental truths, obviously, you know, monks, nuns, saints around the world, yogis, spiritual people, you know, it depends on everybody's different. Everybody's got their own spiritual path.
But oddly enough, it's also the people who run the world. It's not the right or the left, but it's the cabal. It's the weird satanic worshiping people that for whatever reason, they're the puppet masters of our whole world saying,
aha, let's bring in the third world invasion and take all culture away. And those people, that's the oddest, most ironic thing, though, is that they understand this energetic truth that no one's addressing, and there's so much more to energy.
We'll get to it in other episodes regarding weapons and what is and isn't even recognized as real by our society and government regarding energy, but they understand it.
Ironically, use it in a weird way, a demonic way, but they know the secrets of the universe that we as monkeys operating in this five-sense physical world, fear-based, opposite and disconnected from what human beings really are.
I mean, if we looked hard enough, it's never put in front of you regarding our media, but we've got studies where you could blindfold children, they could see, read, you could go pick out things at a grocery store, you could read without sight.
Your consciousness exists outside your five senses. The five senses is actually the joke making you believe that this physical environment is real.
And there are times in human evolution that we have been smarter on a higher level of consciousness.
And I know you've heard this, these utopias, that's probably how we sang the rocks into existence in Egypt.
I believe everything is regarding cycles, whether it's cycles here on earth, cycles in heaven, cycles in nature.
Everything goes from in and out of cycles. And our mass consciousness of stupidity to pure brilliance and self-realization also goes in these swings through thousands of years.
And right now we're definitely more so in the matter-based one.
The very idea that you probably think I'm crazy is supporting what I'm saying.
There's a study in quantum physics called the double slit experiment, and people look at it in many different ways.
The most popular interpretation is the Copenhagen interpretation. There's also the pilot wave theory.
However, I had an interesting thought when I was listening to Thomas Campbell, a famous physicist, explain it in his eyes and how it's probabilistic.
And I was really able to put it together exactly what he was saying, that what the mass consciousness, we know our thoughts create things.
We're all connected in the fundamental field. And what the mass consciousness creates, it's more probability for that to become reality.
What I'm pointing to is if we all wanted to fly and humans could fly and we all believed we could fly, we would be flying.
So we're at a lower state of fear-based matter world. We're not these evolved beings.
Jesus was self-realized, and I have an unpopular belief amongst Christians, is that Jesus wanted you to be self-realized.
He taught his closest followers about this self-realization of knowing that human beings are powerful energetic beings, that miracles can be understood.
All of what he did could be understood, and it is for us. The Kingdom of Heaven lives within you.
However, in modern-day Christianity, and I say that that way, because throughout time and around the world, we have looked at Christianity quite differently.
And it's hard for Christians to, the more normal way for us to think of him is, which I love this part, pure reverence and devotion and awe.
I love that. But when we look to ourselves, we have an unworthy feeling that is put upon us from our post-modern society as Westerners.
And once you really start evaluating that, that is probably the most fundamental thing that changed my entire life,
is once I had someone help me see that this unworthiness that was given to me based on my beliefs and where I was born in this belief system,
that changes everything. But we can't go down that rabbit hole right now.
Jesus knew that every single human being, if they sat still, we all see the same dang thing.
It's the Christ consciousness to center, the spiritual eye. I have a whole video made on it. Please go enjoy it. It's on YouTube.
That's the Holy Trinity, those three things you see in the spiritual eye. It's nothing spooky. I love for you to enjoy that.
But it's hard for us to get there, to be self-realized, because we're living in a world where everything is programmed against you
to understand what you are. Your food, everything we listen to, our attention span, and even in meditation,
it's not going to work without the fuel that fuels the fire, which is already what I mentioned previously,
that devotion, that reverence, that love, that one thing that the whole world is operating off of, of the two human emotions.
It's that further spectrum, that raw reverence, the knot that you're not worthy, but you are in awe.
So the problem also, I think, that's holding a lot of us back in the West and Christians, et cetera, is that we like to personify our God.
We see him. We are made in his image. He sent us Jesus, his Son, so we could completely understand it.
We have the Holy Trinity. Thank you, thank you. That is all real.
However, when it comes to understanding the hardest part, which is how this all works, how did it come about,
we have to step away from that theological stories of human beings and more so into words that Christians get uncomfortable with,
philosophy, logic, physics, terms that they don't like, terms that kind of put us off in order to explain it.
And it is a ton of zeros and ones, logic. We are living in a virtual simulation through the larger consciousness system that is God.
The apparatus is the fundamental field that permeates all without.
Nick Ballstrom, I think is his name, has a beautiful simulation theory. I'll do it in another video that I absolutely believe in.
But I also believe that instead of ancestors watching the simulation, it is the larger consciousness system, God himself, watching the simulation.
And this all only happens in his simulation. This dream world is only being dreamed by him and held together by him.
So the point of all of this is that you do have your theology. You do know that there is this personalized God created for us to understand how it works through him,
personifying as human beings. But both are true. The virtual simulation that he rendered for us to be in is also true.
And as believers, we know this is just temporary. This matter-based world also drained into existence through just basically light and love.
And I don't say that sounds so hippie-dippy. I'm not one of those people. But at this time, I'm actually literally meaning it.
This dream world is here in our home. So it's not our home. Heaven is our home.
So we're going back to part of our virtual simulation inside of God's consciousness is the wonderful astral heavens. And that is our home.
So who cares? We signed up to come here to Earth for soul's growth, to play. And part of the war, part of the AI mass arounds is God's drama playing out.
God was bored. He created because if you go back again, sorry, but I'm close with this, if you look at, that's why I'm saying if you look at philosophy,
we have to get away from the theology and go to more of the larger, hardest, bigger questions that are asked in philosophy.
If we had a perfect God, why did he create the world? So the only answer to that without stepping into a box that would be inconsistent to logic is that he was perfect.
He made this for fun to play. So as horrible as it sounds, and this is why it only works for believers, doesn't work for non believers.
Suffering can exist on this planet because it's not real anyways. Heaven and home being one with God, part of the love vibration, part of the fundamental field,
the larger consciousness system, which if you go as my prior episodes, I've taught you your soul, your awareness, your existence is all one same thing.
Those are the three words I use to describe your consciousness. It cannot be separated from the fundamental field. There is no separation of you and God.
So even when the lights go out on this physical earth suit and you're beamed back into heaven, you're still the same you with the same ness, just feeling a whole lot better.
So that's why there's no getting it wrong. That's why it's okay. We're in a simulation. That's why it's okay. We're going into a mass surveillance.
And that's why it is okay for suffering to happen here because it is all just relative and temporary and it ain't real because nothing, nothing here on at least in the matter world is real.
It's kind of funny. Things that are more ethereal based in heaven are more likely real. All right, guys. Enjoy the ride. Enjoy the simulation. Bye bye.
You