America from 2000 to the Afghanistan/Iraq Wars

What is American History B Online?

The 11th-grade level American History course podcast for BESD.

00:00 Federalism and Executive Orders
Before we dive into the events of this era, I want to give you a lens for understanding everything we're about to cover. This is not just for this lesson, but all the way through the end of the unit. From here on, two big questions run underneath almost every story we'll discuss.
The first: How much power should the federal government have compared to the states? This is called federalism — the balance between national and state authority. The Constitution actually pulls in two directions on this. The Supremacy Clause is a phrase in the Constitution that says that when federal law and state law conflict, federal law wins. We saw this in Civil Rights. States tried to override the Fourteenth Amendment, but failed.
But it’s not just the Supremacy Clause – there’s another clause that steps in the opposite direction. It’s often called the reserved powers clause, but a more precise name for it is the Tenth Amendment. The Tenth Amendment states that any power the Constitution doesn't specifically give the federal government belongs to the states - and to the people.
These two ideas – that the national government is more powerful AND that power is reserved for the states - have been in tension since the founding. And they still are today.
So if the first question is “What’s the balance between state and national power?”, the second question is this: How much power should the president have compared to Congress? The Founders designed Congress to be the most powerful branch. The reason was simple: They knew George Washington was going to be the president. The role they wanted and knew they’d get was in Congress. And so they wrote about Congress first, and they wrote about it the most. They gave it the power to declare war. But over time, Congress has given up a lot of its power, and presidents have taken more. Understanding that balance of power dynamic is essential to understanding American politics right now.
The main tool presidents use is the executive order. An executive order is a directive issued by the president. It carries the force of law, and it doesn’t need the approval of Congress. It may help to remember that the president is the head of the executive branch of the government.
You’re probably thinking something about how Congress is supposed to check the power of the president. Or how Congress makes laws. So you need to understand that a president can’t just issue an executive order because they want to (although most of them try).
Presidents can only use executive orders in two situations. First, Congress often passes a law but leaves the details up to the president to figure out. Congress might say, “We’re going to give this money to build bridges.” But then it’s up to the president to decide where and how to build those bridges. The Founders envisioned most of those decisions as resting with Congress, but Congress has, over time, given more and more power to the president.
The second thing that allows the president to issue an executive order is the necessary and proper clause. That clause gives the government the power to do whatever is necessary and proper to carry out its constitutional duties. Sometimes they call that the elastic clause, because it stretches. And recent presidents have stretched that clause in all kinds of directions.
Keep those two questions in mind. Again: How much power should a president have? and How much power should the federal government have? You'll see these two questions repeatedly in this unit – and in your life for the next few years.
________________________________________
04:29 The Election of 2000
On with the 2000s.
The decade opened with one of the most contested elections in American history.
Republican George W. Bush — son of the former president — faced Democrat Al Gore in a race that came down to a single state: Florida. The margin there was so thin that an automatic recount was triggered. And then the arguments started. Different counties were counting votes differently. Some ballots were disputed – you couldn’t always tell with the old paper ballots what the voter actually meant. That indented spot on the ballot – was that supposed to be a vote? With the dispute, lawyers flooded in. The whole country watched Florida argue over ballots.
The mess eventually landed in the Supreme Court, which ruled 5-4 to stop the recount. George W. Bush was awarded Florida's electoral votes — and with them, the presidency.
Gore had actually won the popular vote nationwide. But the president is chosen by the Electoral College, not the popular vote. And so Bush became president. Some Americans cheered; others railed against it. But whoever you agreed with, it was clear that the new millennium was off to a strange start.
________________________________________
05:47 No Child Left Behind
One of Bush's first major domestic initiatives was the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. No Child Left Behind was a federal education law requiring schools to meet performance thresholds on standardized tests. In other words, every student in the school had to take a test at the end of the year. And if the school didn’t meet the goals the government set for it, they faced serious consequences: restructuring, staff replacements, or losing federal funding.
The goal was straightforward: Hold schools accountable for whether students were actually learning.
But while the goal may have been straightforward, the reality was much more complicated.
One of the first issues was what mattered in school. They decided that reading and math were the focuses. Most other subjects were pushed away or ignored. If you wondered why your parents learned about history in elementary school and you didn’t until you were much older, it’s because of No Child Left Behind. The same applies to art, which – at the elementary level – is now taught by a teaching assistant instead of a certified teacher.
Critics argued the law pushed teachers to "teach to the test" — drilling students on exactly what would be measured — rather than developing deeper understanding or creativity.
You probably didn’t know this, but the #1 predictor of your success in school is actually your zip code. Students from richer schools have more resources – and more resources often means a better education. As a result, schools in struggling communities often faced the harshest consequences. Supporters of No Child Left Behind said accountability was long overdue, and that without measurable standards, failing schools could go unnoticed for years.
And so the education you grew up with – the one you’re getting right now – was fundamentally impacted by an act of Congress.
Here’s one of the key things: The Constitution never talks about education. And so the debate continues to rage about whether the federal government should interfere in education at all. It’s that federalism issue popping up.
________________________________________
08:08 September 11, 2001
Education was important to George W. Bush. And so on the morning of September 11, 2001, he was reading to a group of elementary students when nineteen terrorists hijacked four commercial airplanes. They flew two into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City. They flew one into the Pentagon just outside Washington, D.C. The fourth was most likely headed for Washington. But the passengers by that point had heard about what the terrorists were doing, and they tried to retake the plane. The terrorists flew it into the ground in Pennsylvania.
In all, nearly 3,000 people – most innocent civilians - were killed. It was the deadliest attack on American soil since Pearl Harbor.
The country went into shock. And then it went to war.
________________________________________
The Patriot Act
Within weeks, Congress passed the Patriot Act — a sweeping law that dramatically expanded the government's ability to conduct surveillance in the name of detecting and preventing terrorism.
Under the Patriot Act, intelligence agencies gained new powers to monitor phone calls, emails, and financial records. They often did it without warrants or other judicial oversight. The argument for it was simple: we needed every tool available to prevent another attack.
The argument against it was equally simple: the Constitution protects Americans from unreasonable searches. The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. How much privacy were Americans as a society willing to give up for security?
That debate didn't end when the crisis faded. The Patriot Act's provisions have been renewed, modified, and argued over for more than two decades. The tension between security and civil liberties it created is very much alive today.
________________________________________
10:11 The War in Afghanistan
The terrorists responsible for the attacks were part of a group called Al-Qaeda. Al-Qaeda had planned the 9/11 attacks from Afghanistan, where they were being sheltered by a fundamentalist government called the Taliban. The United States demanded the Taliban hand over Al-Qaeda's leader, Osama bin Laden. The Taliban refused.
So the United States went to war with Afghanistan.
American forces moved quickly. The Taliban government fell within months. Bin Laden fled into hiding. Mission accomplished, right?
Not quite.
The Taliban didn't disappear. They retreated into the mountains and countryside and waited. Meanwhile, the United States found itself trying to build a stable democratic government in a country with deep tribal divisions, rampant corruption, and virtually no history of democratic rule.
American troops would remain in Afghanistan for twenty years. That makes it the longest war in American history. The reason it dragged on so long comes down to this: defeating an army in the field is very different from building a nation. The U.S. was good at the first part. The second part proved nearly impossible.
________________________________________
11:33 The War in Iraq
In 2003, the United States opened a second front.
The Bush administration made the case that Saddam Hussein — whom you'll remember from the Gulf War — was developing weapons of mass destruction. That means chemical weapons, biological weapons, or even nuclear weapons. Bush suggested invasion, and tried to sell that suggestion to both the American people and America’s allies.
Remember how the Gulf War was fast? How American forces went in, won in 100 hours, and came home? That memory was very much on people's minds. Most Americans — and many military planners — believed the Iraq War would unfold the same way. Go in. Remove Saddam. Be welcomed as liberators. Come home by summer. America!
And so in March 2003, Congress authorized the U.S. invasion of Iraq. American forces, with their allies, moved into the country.
But that quick war they believed in? It didn’t happen.
Saddam was eventually captured. But no weapons of mass destruction were ever found. The intelligence had been wrong. Meanwhile, the country descended into chaos. Different factions began fighting each other. A brutal insurgency targeted American troops. The United States found itself, once again, trying to rebuild a nation in the middle of a war it hadn't anticipated.
The Iraq War lasted nearly nine years. Thousands of American soldiers died. Over 100,000 Iraqis died (and by some accounts, over half a million Iraqis died). The cost ran into the trillions of dollars. And the destabilization it caused continues to ripple across the entire Middle East.
________________________________________
13:22 Conclusion
In the span of just a few years — from a disputed election to two open-ended wars — the United States had been fundamentally changed. And while all of this was happening overseas, life at home was quietly transforming in ways that nobody fully appreciated yet.
That's where we'll pick up next time.