I Used To Be Crap At Sales

If you’ve ever felt the tension between sales and marketing… you’re not alone. In this episode, Mark Walker (who's lived both lives) joins our host Mark Ackers to explore one of the most persistent pain points in B2B: sales and marketing alignment.

From junk MQLs to misattributed pipeline, they pull no punches in exposing the outdated structures, broken metrics, and political infighting that derail revenue teams. You’ll learn how to rethink SDR reporting lines, why most account based marketing (ABM) campaigns fall flat, and what it really means to align around revenue.

🔑 In this episode, you’ll learn:
 • Why confidence in your product is critical for sales success
 • How one viral video built instant buyer trust
 • The real reason MQLs break trust between sales and marketing
 • Why some marketers should earn commission—and some SDRs shouldn’t
 • A bold take on founder-led sales and roadmap discipline
 • What great ABM looks like (and how to fix it fast)

Whether you’re a CRO, CMO, or sales leader tired of the blame game—this episode gives you the tools and mindset to build a unified revenue engine.

✅ Find out more about how MySalesCoach are supporting sales teams like yours:
 / https://www.mysalescoach.com/

✅ Get a MySalesCoach Membership, for you or your team for only £20 per month per person (+vat)
https://www.mysalescoach.com/pricing

✅ Connect with Us:

Follow Mark Ackers on LinkedIn: / https://www.linkedin.com/in/markackers/
Follow MySalesCoach on LinkedIn: / https://www.linkedin.com/company/mysalescoach-com
Follow Mark Walker on LinkedIn: /  https://www.linkedin.com/in/jfdimark/

✅ SUBSCRIBE to the audio Podcast I USED TO BE CRAP AT SALES:

Subscribe and Review on iTunes: 
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/i-used-to-be-crap-at-sales/id1734830248

Subscribe and Review on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/0uhvimbYfGIfr456Az2MW4

Subscribe and Review on Amazon Podcasts: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/b85042dd-4d6b-4fbe-9d9e-11dcdbddd20a/i-used-to-be-crap-at-sales

👍 Like this episode?
Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more sales coaching insights!

#SalesAndMarketingAlignment #ABM #B2BSales #SalesDevelopment #FounderLedSales #SDRLeadership #RevOps #GoToMarketStrategy #SalesEnablement #RevenueLeadership #SalesTraining #salescoaching 

What is I Used To Be Crap At Sales?

Even the most prominent voices in Sales were crap at Sales once.

Join bestselling Author, Founder and Sales Coach Mark Ackers as he speaks with successful Sales professionals about their early Sales struggles, and how they overcame these challenges to become the people they are today.

Mark Ackers: If you're enjoying
the I used to be crap at sales

podcast. Show us some love,
please. Like, share, subscribe

to the podcast. Help us grow and
spread the word what's coming up

in today's episode. Do

Mark Walker: not pay sales
people permission. It drives all

the wrong behaviours, and
everyone's jaw dropped. They've

gone from five to over 100
billion like. Unbelievable

story. None of their sales
teamwork

Mark Ackers: commission. That's
obviously a big part of why

people work in sales and the
highs being the highs, the lows

been the lows, the commission
that comes in. He's been a three

time CRO a go to market coach, a
mentor at TechStars, and, scale

wise, a long term pavilion
leader and now the founder and

CEO at revved up. But before all
of that, he cut his teeth in

marketing, leading brand and
growth at Eventbrite, and then

moving to a test in a similar
role. Today's guest is Mark

Walker. Did you used to be crap
at sales?

Mark Walker: Yes, I did. I saw
them the dream of there being in

front of 100 key decision
makers, and the event just

didn't pan out that way. There
was maybe like 20 people in the

booth. So this sponsor was not
very happy at all. Brand is

probably the biggest driver of
sales and closing deals, but

it's impossible to attribute
directly, and that's why so many

people are missing

Mark Ackers: their revenue. I've
heard many a marketer say this,

well, I want some commission,
then I would

Mark Walker: actually rot trying
to finesse the attribution model

of how much did Martin
contribute to this number? How

much did sales contribute to
this number? If you want them to

have the same level of ownership
that a sales team does, then why

wouldn't you also give them
performance driven metrics?

Mark Ackers: How imperative
would you say great Account

Based Marketing is in today's
sales landscape,

Mark Walker: bland campaigns
that don't directly speak to

specific accounts still much
more difficult to actually get

the level of depth that's
required for ABM. That's what

helps cut through. What

Mark Ackers: kind of percent do
you think can really get an

Account Based Marketing? Right?
Very few right now. Where's the

quick fixes?

Mark Walker: The fixes with

Mark Ackers: Hello and welcome
to another episode of The I used

to be crap at sales podcast. I'm
your host. Mark Akers, the co

founder and Head of Sales here
at my sales coach and today's

guest brings a new background
and work experience that's so

far been uncovered in the
podcast. Sure, he's got the

sales and leadership and
coaching experience. He's also

coached hundreds of founders and
sales leaders along the way.

Today's theme is what sales can
learn from marketing and what

founders learn on the front
lines. Mark, welcome to the

podcast. How are you? Mark,
thank you so much. I'm great.

Really excited to be here. I've
listened to several of these

episodes. It's a brilliant
podcast. So delighted to be part

of it, and yeah, life's pretty
good right now. Fantastic. Yeah,

you just telling me off camera.
It sounds like a really exciting

time at revved up. And I
certainly want to hear all about

that and share that with the
audience. But before we can get

into any of that, we have to
start with our Yes. No. Question

Mark Walker, did you used to be
crap at sales? Yes, yes, I did.

When you say yes, yes, I did. Is
there a point in your career

that really springs to mind very
clearly, and it was my first job

out of university. What I was
selling was conferences, my B to

B conferences, specifically in
the pharmaceuticals industry,

there were two different types
of sales that you had to do

there. One was delegate sales,
so people buying the tickets.

Now I didn't actually do that
myself. I had to try and manage

a sales team, having never done
sales, which is maybe a

different story. But you also
had to try and sell your own

sponsorship. So that was
slightly bigger ticket sales.

You intended to try and do 510,
20k, deals with sometimes

pretty, pretty large
organisations. And because it's

my first job out of university,
I'm cutting my teeth. I got a

lot of the crappier products,
the the events that didn't have

great sponsorship reputation. So
yeah, I was just hitting the

phones trying to sell
sponsorships to these no named

events that I was producing and
putting on. And it was a

struggle. It was. It was a
pretty steep learning curve. I

did make some sales, but I
probably lost way more than I

could have made. Have you got a
particular story from that time

that you can look back on that's
quite funny now, but perhaps a

mistake or a howler, if you
will, that you made. The most

painful memory from that time
was a sale I did make, and we

didn't deliver value to them,
right? So it's a slightly

different tangent than not
having made the sale, but it was

quite cringy. I sold, I sold to
this business and sold them the

dream of there'd be in front of

Mark Walker: key decision
makers. And the event just

didn't pan out that way for
various reasons, largely outside

of our control. And there was
maybe like 20 people in the

room, so this sponsor was not
very happy at all. So that was

quite painful. And just dealing
with that taught me a lot around

mitigating angry people in
general. But also, just like

having confidence in what you
sell is so important, and that

knocked my confidence, and that.

Really impacted future sales,
right? Because I didn't know

whether we could deliver the
value that I had to give to

future sponsors. And it took
moving, I would say it took

moving to the next company that
had better products, that I had

more control over, to really
build my confidence back up. So,

you know, one of my earlier
sales lessons was you have to

believe in what you're selling,
otherwise it just comes through,

right? Whoever you're selling to
can feel whether you believe in

Mark Ackers: it or not. I think
a lot of people will resonate

with that. I think people
sometimes confuse you gotta love

what you sell versus having
confidence in it. When I look

back at my career, I feel like
I've always had confidence in

what I sold, but I can certainly
relate to doing demos where

you're not quite sure if you
press this button that the next

page is going to load. I
remember, actually, I had all

the tabs open and I would jump
from tab to tab rather than go

for it. And I got called out on
that, I can see what you're

doing, Mark you're going from
tab to tab rather than clicking

through the platform. And that
lack of confidence because the

product's not quite there can be
quite impactful. Fortunately, it

was a long time ago in my in my
career, that's a nice segue. And

call this out early doors, bring
it up. You and I, we actually

crossed paths. I think it was
2017 maybe the start of 2018 you

were, I think you were in the
CRO role at a test at this

point. So you'd gone from
marketing to CRO, and it was in

my early days as an AE at
refract. I'd probably got about

five years sales experience, but
really probably had the same

year five times. And I remember
I was dealing with your

colleague, Hillary at the time,
who's actually now a coach at my

sales coach small world, and she
said, there's just one last

thing, Mark, you need to meet
our CRO Mark Walker and present

to him. I did, and we got the
deal over the line. And I loved

working with you during our
time. But, yeah, I'm curious,

what do you remember of that
demo discovery I did

Mark Walker: with you? Funny
enough, I don't remember that

many sales calls, but I do
remember this one, so you'll be

happy to hear that. Well, I
don't know. It depends what you

about to say, No, it's for good
reasons. So before you joined

the call, this is critical. I
knew who you were ish because of

the video that you did on
LinkedIn that went viral, where

you were teaching your cousin, I
think, or like, it was a nine

year old. I can't remember
whether it's your cousin or like

a friend's kid. I don't know
whether Hillary shared it with

me or I came across it
organically, but either way,

that was a wonderful bit of
content that built an enormous

amount of trust and credibility
with you as an individual. When

we first spoke, I'd already
built a perception in my mind

about you being an expert in
this space that really helped

significantly. And then I do
remember, I think there was

probably two or three things
that I think you did really well

during during that call, right?
The first is, you actually

didn't leave any assumptions on
the table, right? You sent,

checked and queried and we went
over everything, instead of kind

of glossing things over. You try
to unpick things and just just

hear firsthand. Are these the
problems that I was experiencing

as the CRO attest, which I
thought was quite refreshing.

You didn't try and rush anything
through. The second piece was

there was a key integration
missing, or in the pipeline, or

something. I can't, can't quite
remember exactly, but I do

remember that was an objection,
and you handled it like really

well, right? Because it was a it
was a big thing for us. It was a

great experience of how to do
discovery.

Mark Ackers: Well, I remember
having and like you say, I don't

remember every discovery call,
but I do remember meeting you

for that first time and feeling
like it went well. For those

wondering, the clip you're
referring to, that was actually

Kevin, my co founder and the CEO
of my sales coach. It was his

son. We did a bit of a social
experiment where I coached him

to make cold calls, and then he
did some cold calling that day,

just sort of warm, friendly
faces, but they were still not

really knowing when the call was
going to come or what the

purpose of it was. And, yeah, I
think that video, certainly in

my realm, went viral. I think it
was like, you know, half a

million impressions, pretty much
out the gate, and lots of

comments, etc. But I think the
key thing that I want to take

from this is social selling that
brand. And you use the word

critical, you're saying that was
critical to your sales

experience. Was my called it
brand. It probably wasn't a

brand back then, but what might
felt like one was that social

presence that I'd managed to get
online on LinkedIn made you feel

like you trusted me in that
credibility straight away. This

will date the podcast slightly,
but you'd have seen the cool

screening that Apple have
released that's coming out in

September. I did a webinar, and
I'm curious to get your take on

this. One of the things I said
in this webinar was, I think

this is opportunity. First of
all, if I just picked up the

phone and dialled, let's say I
dialled you now, my phone number

would just pop up. If you
haven't got me saved, you'd look

at that and you just think, Ah,
I don't know who this is, not

sure. I've actually got the
chance to promote it to you. You

know that call screen could say
it's Mark acres. I think you saw

the video of me coaching Joe,
the 10 year old, to make cold

calls. Yeah, you're more likely
to answer it. And I made the

argument now that when I recruit
sales people, the first thing I

do is I look at their LinkedIn
before, before a CV, and I look

to see, do they sell socially?
Do they write LinkedIn posts?

Are they engaging? Have they got
500 plus connections? As it is a

in the past, I've sort of made
the excuse. Oh, well, they don't

do that, but look how credible
their background, their CV,

their results, are still gonna
go with this person. I feel like

now it's non negotiable when
hiring a salesperson in this

space, they've gotta have a
social brand. But I know maybe

that's just me. What do you
think?

Mark Walker: I think it's
getting towards that non

negotiable? I don't know if I'm
quite all the way there, but

it's definitely tipping towards
that so very similar to your

point around the phone screening
technology, right? One of the

things that a lot of people
don't realise with cold email,

right? There's, there's a lot of
talk around cold emails, dead

and so on, and it is absolutely
harder and harder to cut through

with cold email. One of the
things that's so, so important

to the efficacy of it is, if you
get an email from someone you

recognise, you are going to open
it, right? So again, if you have

built some kind of brand
presence and credibility in your

space, and you then send emails
to people, they are so much more

likely to open it. It's going to
trump the best subject line.

It's definitely going to trump
any personalization you can put

in it. It's who that email is
from, right? My mum does not

have to personalise an email for
me to open it, right? It's from

someone I know. Maybe that's a
bad example, right? I'd probably

put that one in the in the spam
folder, but, yeah, that brand

presence and credibility is
super, super important now, and

there's two parts to it, right?
One is, does the company have a

strong brand, right? It's
there's a reason it's easier to

sell the sales force or a gong
than it would be from one of

their challenger brands, because
there's a lot of credit

credibility with the brand. But
as you said, particularly if

you're selling at an SMB, if you
yourself have built a bit of a

brand reputation, and you email
someone that's engaged with your

posts, you don't even need to
say, Hey, I saw you liked my

post. I actually often think
that doesn't come across that

well, but just the fact that you
are sending emails to someone

that already knows who you are
is going to make it much more

likely that they open it and
engage with it. And maybe one

final point, you shouldn't
always care just about the

vanity metrics when it comes to
social posting. And the reason I

say this is I post regularly,
and I don't have huge numbers of

impressions or likes, right? I
just post regularly, and I

believe that it drives good
results. Why do I say this two

things. One, I go to a lot of
events. I typically will go to

an event every single week, and
I cannot remember the last time

I went to an event and someone
didn't say, Hey, Mark, I

recognise you that I didn't know
I see you posting all the time

on LinkedIn, and I had no idea
that they followed me. No idea

they're not showing up in my
metrics, but it's qualitatively.

It's having valuable impact on
my brand and reputation within

the industry that I care about.
So yeah, it's it's not always

showing up in the metrics, but
it's absolutely, categorically

working. And then on top of
that, I will get direct DMS and

organic outreach coming back.
And I know it's hard to connect.

But I know it's coming from
LinkedIn, because they'll say,

Oh, I saw this post. So yeah,
lots of good reasons there that

people should be investing in
building their brand on

Mark Ackers: LinkedIn. I totally
agree. Yeah, I think I'm at the

point. Now, if you're not doing
it, I'd say it's non negotiable.

And to your point, even if
someone's not actively engaging,

there sort of that Lurker, if
you will. But here's what I do

know. Before you meet someone,
they're likely to look at your

LinkedIn profile. Even though
they just scan your content,

they'll say, okay, because there
is this almost illusion that if

you're writing and putting
yourself out there, you must

know what you're talking about.
And I see that happen all the

time. Let's talk about your
early sales experience, because

you have, we're talking just off
camera that you've had such a

varied career, like events,
conferences, marketing, revenue.

Where do you believe you
actually learn how to sell?

Mark Walker: I don't know. There
is, there is a singular moment

where, you know the light
appeared and it's like, I now

can sell. It's definitely been
an evolution of over time, and I

think I've learned bits and
pieces from each role, each

colleague that I've worked with,
I've picked up bits and pieces

along the way. I guess the most
sales centric role that I had

when I really started to
consider myself better at sales

was when I got to a test and I
started to move from pure

marketing to looking after the
whole revenue function, and I

just immerse myself in
everything and anything I could

find around sales. I listened to
every podcast, read every blog

post, bought books. It's when I
joined pavilion and I would pick

anyone's brains that you could
imagine. Imagine I'd have hour

long calls with people. I'd join
these dinners and so on. So I

just completely immersed myself.
But most importantly, I then

practised it, because I got to
then practice the theory

speaking to prospects all the
time and seeing what worked and

what didn't. I would say that's
where I genuinely good at sales,

but I definitely had various
experiences in sales along the

way. And one other moment, I
think it was before I was at

Eventbrite, and someone wants
remarks to me. They're like,

man, you're good at sales, or
you should. You should be in

sales. It was some kind of
remark by that. And I remember

thinking, No, I'm not a
salesperson. And the reason they

said that is because I built
trust and credibility very

quickly with prospects by being
a product expert. I really knew

in and out what I was trying to
say, again, I wasn't technically

a salesperson, but what maybe a
bit of context. In this role, I

owned the event. So I owned the
P and L and the overall revenue

for this event, and that
included everything from, you

know, creating the agenda to to
the sponsorship revenue number,

the delegate sales revenue
number, the marketing of the

event, and so on and so forth.
So part of my role was

interfacing with sponsors, even
though I wasn't specifically

sponsorship sales. That's where
the sponsors were just warm to

me and I built that credibility.
And the sales team were like,

Hey, be good at sales, right?
You were helping make the sale.

That was a really nice moment
earlier, before I considered

myself truly in sales and
revenue.

Mark Ackers: And it's
interesting, because being an

expert in the product means you
can recommend the right things.

But one of the things that I
found in my career is it's all

well and good, be an expert in
the product, but you have to be

an expert in your ICP their
world. Why they go to work, what

problems they really have? How
do they moan about those

problems at the dinner table?
And I remember there was a

moment in my career when I
realised I've just onboarded

people to become product
experts. I listened to their

demos, and everything sounded
like it was being run by a very

technical person and just wasn't
connecting with the ICP. I'm

wondering, did your background
and time in marketing help you

with that shift into into sales,
or was there anything you had to

unlearn. It's a good

Mark Walker: question. Firstly,
I'd agree with the observation,

right? Like one of my bug bears
that I think I've posted about

on LinkedIn a few times, is
people get onboarding wrong.

They should spend way more time
on onboarding people in the

market and the customer's
problems than they should in the

product, right? And usually it's
like an hour of here's an ICP

definition. That's all you get.
Now, all we're going to do is

talk about the product in terms
of, like, what I learned from

marketing and that has benefited
sales and maybe some pieces that

haven't. So again, marketing,
ideally you should be good at

storytelling, right? So being
able to simplify and tell the

good narrative is something that
a lot of people don't do well.

In sales, they focus on the
features and even like features

benefits, but they don't craft a
story or a narrative. Again, in

marketing, if you are going to
create good campaigns and good

overarching narratives. If
you're doing marketing Well, it

has to be based on deep research
and understanding of your

market. And so one of the things
when I was leading marketing and

sales is I would always ask the
marketing team to specifically

listen to sales calls at least
once a week, twice a week, right

to actually understand the
language being used by the

prospects. Otherwise, how can
you do good marketing? I do

think a mistake that I see from
marketing is is they think

theoretically or abstractly
about the market, and they don't

actually understand exactly how
a prospect speaks, and they also

don't understand the challenges
that sales are facing, either,

right? So there's two parts to
this that you get from listening

to discovery calls and so on.
So. So one is what actual

language is the prospect using?
Like, are they calling it x, and

we're trying to call it y, and
then the second piece is hearing

those, hearing the objections
that sales is facing, should

really help Martin think about,
well, here's what we need to we

need to create these sales
enablement materials. Or, Oh,

man, we we keep hearing this and
we don't have a case study for

it, or we don't have this battle
card prepared, or we don't have

a story to tell around this
particular lack of functionality

and why we've invested more over
here so you get the best ideas

from listening to real calls
that can be put back into mock

Mark Ackers: looking to unlock
your team's full potential. At

my sales coach, we pair
individuals and teams with

expert coaches for personalised
one to one and group coaching.

Concessions. Our platform makes
booking seamless. It tracks

progress and delivers real
results. Studies show expert

coaching increases win rates by
30% and revenue by 7% whether

you're an individual or a team
leader, we provide coaching that

sticks and delivers visit
mysalescoach.com use the link in

the bio and start achieving your
goals today, and it feels like

what you're saying there, it's
just so obvious and in today's

world, when call recording and
conversation intelligence

products exist and you can share
transcripts and review calls and

clips really easily, every body
in the company should be doing

that, let alone marketing, but
it feels like what you're

talking about really, you were
ahead of your time thinking like

that, because we're going back
earlier on in your career, when

you were in a marketing role,
and it's interesting that it

sort of brought back memories
for me. So I started out in

marketing as well. When I did my
student placement, I did it at

Sunderland Football Club, and I
remember the marketing manager

made a comment that, why are we
sat in a different office to the

sales team? And at the time, I
thought, Oh, I'm glad I'm glad

we are. They're bloody noisy.
They're on their phones all the

time. I get my work done. But he
made this big push that we

should all be sat in the same
room. We should all be talking

to each other. We should be
hearing how they sell. They

should be feeding back to us
from a marketing point of view.

And he never quite got his own
way, and it felt like sales

consistently misunderstood
marketing and marketing

consistently misunderstood
sales. Where do you commonly see

the two departments misfiring
with each other? It sounds like

language is an example, but have
you got some other tidbits there

for us? Yeah, language is a huge
one. I think the number one root

cause of a lot of misalignment
is a misalignment in in goals

and metrics. That's pretty much
the the root cause in many

scenarios. So the classic setup
in SAS was to create this, yeah,

factory, factory style funnel,
where marketing were tasked with

MQLs. And those MQLs get handed
over to SDRs to qualify into

SQL, and then obviously, from
SQL to ops going through to the

AES. The challenge with that was
there's two challenges. One,

marketing just stopped caring at
MQL, right? Because that is how

they're bonus, and that's how
they're metric. Metrices, gold.

Let's use an easier word,

Mark Walker: and and so how
often have you seen sales teams

just tearing their hair out that
marketing celebrating having hit

their MQL, MQL goal for the
quarter, and there's no pipeline

that they can close, right?
Because they're not actually

connected.

And so that that's one major
issue. And then the other piece

is the definition of that MQL
and whether it actually lines up

to what sales can can close, I
would say that's like a number

one root cause and and I think
the idea that marketing just

generate junk leads and MQLs for
the sake of it, then leads to a

lack of trust and credibility
from the sales team, right? And

that that pervades many, many
organisations. Because if you

grew up in that environment, you
know, and you were selling and

marketing that type of
environment, you know, seven,

eight years ago, you've probably
lost faith in marketing as

you've gone on to other
organisations as well. I've

certainly had that frustration
in my in my career, you know,

marketers creating content, I'm
just like, What is this? It

doesn't reflect the
conversations that I'm having.

It uses different language, the
stereotype of creating junk

leads. I would say that is the
meme that when I see that pop up

on like Instagram, where
marketing sending a lead to

sales, and so that makes me
laugh the most because I've just

lived in that world, and it does
feel like it's changing. I've

got a number of friends that
work in Marketing, and a couple

of them have recently been
acquired. They've said to me

all, it's all changing. Our
marketing metrics now are

revenue based, and they're
uncomfortable with that, and

it's so different. What about
you? When in your marketing days

in Have you had the revenue KPIs
before, or have you more focused

on the MQLs? So again, earlier
in the career, when I was head

of growth at Eventbrite, it was
much more heavily MQL based.

Maybe didn't drive all the right
behaviours, although I would

like to think that we tracked
how many of those MQLs did

ultimately turn into
opportunities and turn into

revenue. We had a really great
run over the three years I was,

I was driving that my default
thinking was MQL, right? Because

that is how I was measured in my
role. And if I did anything

else, I wouldn't necessarily
get, get the credit for it. And

so the real shift in thinking
was when I, I got to a test and

I was, I was like, Well, look,
we're an early stage company,

right? There's nowhere to hide.
If I generate pipeline or MQLs

and it doesn't close, the whole
business is in a bad state,

right? So I have to drive all of
my mentality to closing

business, right? If I don't do
that, then what's the point in

doing the.

Marketing side of things, so
that really shifted my focus and

and all the metrics that we
looked at were built up from,

are we driving, driving the
revenue number? Ultimately, I

think there's a big challenge.
It's okay in a smaller

organisation, because you can
all be one team, it's kind of

easier to track things. And you
can shout across the room,

right? Oh yeah, I see so and
so's close, and it's maybe not

showing up in the revenue
attribution model, but we know

that we met them at that event,
whatever, right like, it's just

a little bit easier to try and
connect the dots in a wider

organisation. It is inherently
political, because you your

marketing budget and your head
count and so on is probably

going to get set by these
attribution metrics that have to

be trackable, and so I've heard
this right in organisations

where sales are screaming for
particular case studies or

battle cards or like certain
things that marketing is the

best equipped to provide, but
they will not provide them

because they won't show up in
any attribution model, so they

will not get any credit for it,
and therefore their budgets and

their numbers and so on, they
will be the ones getting raked

over the calls. There's just a
fundamental issue with

attribution and modelling in a
lot of modern day revenue teams.

Mark Ackers: So let's imagine I
dropped you in stereotypical

company that's got that problem.
Maybe someone's listening to

that and they they recognise
this problem. What are some of

the things that you would do, or
even suggest, maybe as a coach,

to try and fix that?

Mark Walker: This is not a
popular opinion. Some people

might say it's naive, but I
disagree otherwise. I wouldn't

hold it as an opinion. So what I
would try and do is convince the

rest of the leadership team, or
if I just had the magic one to

do it, where I would actually
drop the trying to finesse the

attribution model of how much
did marketing contribute to this

number? How much did sales
contribute to this number?

Because that is inherently what
drives politics and infighting

and the sharp elbows. And I
would just look at the number.

Did we hit the number this
quarter? Or did we not hit the

number this quarter, and we are
all winning, or we are all

losing together as a team? Now
that is deeply antithetical to

how most most organisations are
run, and I get deeply

uncomfortable, because if you
don't hit the number, how do you

start to dissect it, right? How
do you start to understand and

if you did hit the number, how
do you then try and optimise

your spend going forward? Right?
Because there might be a bunch

of dead weight that's been
carried, but it does solve an

enormous number of sins by
saying, don't worry too much

about whether this exact event,
this exact webinar, whether 15%

of budget spent on PPC was the
exact right, right number,

because that that often ends up
with weird over optimization as

well. So slightly chunky example
that I usually give is football

team, 11 players who's going to
get the attribution most of the

time, it's the striker, right?
It's your forward, because

they're the ones most likely
score the goals. So you go, Huh,

well, the defenders didn't do
much here for this game. So you

start to get rid of your
defenders and then your

midfielders and your keeper and
so on, and you end up with a

team of 11 strikers. They're not
going to perform very well,

right? But that's how we set up
revenue teams, right? We say,

well, who's got the last touch?
Maybe there's a bit of first

touch attribution. All your
money goes to there, and then

you're missing the messiness of
today's modern buyer. And again,

like going back to our point
around building brand and

perception on social, if it
doesn't show up in the numbers,

you won't do it, but it's such a
miss, and that's why so little

money gets spent on brand when
it comes to marketing. And brand

is probably the biggest driver
of sales and closing deals, but

it's impossible to attribute
directly, and that's why so many

people are missing their revenue
number, because they haven't

built the trust and credibility
that gets those deals over the

line because they won't invest
in brand, because you can't

prove the ROI, and so marketing
doesn't do it, and everyone

suffers. There you go. There's
my soap box piece. So

Mark Ackers: there's a lot to
break down there. I think the

key thing that I'm taking from
what you're saying is you need

to measure together as a team,
sales and marketing. We've got

different goals that serve
different motivations, and like

you say, like politics, and I've
seen those play out in

organisations. The first
challenge that I've seen play

out when you start to have those
conversations, and I've heard

many a marketer say this, well,
I want some commission. Then

what do you think

Mark Walker: about that? Again,
difference between commission

and bonus? I've mostly worked in
organisations that have had a

bonus driven marketing team,
where you want marketing to

share the sharp end of revenue,
then they should also share in

the upside as well. So everyone
complains that marketing are the

colouring in department, or
they're doing the jump jump

leads and so on. If you want
them to have the same level of

ownership that a. Sales team
does and essentially carry

quota, then why wouldn't you
also give them performance

driven metrics? Now, it might
not be straight up commission

like a sales team, and this is,
again, it's a difficult debate.

I don't know whether there is a
singular correct answer to this

marketing in a mid market to
enterprise type motion where a

sales rep is needed to close the
deal, marketing can't close the

deal for them, right? So they
can't actually drive the revenue

number themselves, but they can
massively help contribute

towards it, and they can also do
all the wrong behaviours to mean

you don't get the revenue
number. So I think they should

take a share of the spoils,
maybe not commissioned, but

absolutely be bonus driven. And
is

Mark Ackers: that what you put
in place in previous

organisations? You beat them,
yeah, and it's what

Mark Walker: we're doing at Rev
death as well. The marketing

team will have a revenue number
and they will have a bonus

attached to

Mark Ackers: it. Do you think,
let's just say we meet up again

in 10 years time? Is that gonna
be more common? Or do you think

that's just not gonna happen
widespread across other

organisations. My

Mark Walker: take is it should
be more common. Will it be every

time you have a crystal ball,
you look silly, right? But,

yeah, I actually think it will
be. I mean, it's super

interesting. The whole
commission like, how do you

drive behaviours through
incentives? I sat next to a

dinner. This was a while back,
like a year ago with the CRO of

a pretty large organisation, and
they'd driven incredible

success. I think they've gone
from five to over 100 million

like, unbelievable story. And
everyone's jaw dropped when they

said none of their sales team
were commissioned right. They

just did base. They're like, it
drives the right behaviours and

everyone's just like, No, it's
impossible. Like, how do you

attract the right talent? How do
you retain them? How do you just

like, This is how you do it.
Absolutely, 100% believe in it.

Do not pay sales people
Commission. It drives all the

wrong behaviours. There's
different models for different

businesses that will work.
There's no one size fits all.

But maybe the world will go
towards no commission for sales

and marketing, or maybe it will
go all the other way, and

everyone will get commission and
bonuses across the board. I'm

just looking at BEC

Mark Ackers: when you say sales
people should not get

commission, I'm sitting there
going, that's the headline we're

leading with Marvel, because
that's such a Beatty topic,

right? That makes me feel
emotional, like, that's

obviously a big part of why
people work in sales, and the

highs being the highs, the low
has been the lows, the

commission that comes in. When
you heard that we don't pay

salespeople commission. Did you
lean in and go, go on, I'm

listening. Or did you think
ridiculous?

Mark Walker: I thought both. I
was like, this is the most nuts

thing I've ever come across. And
funnily enough, it was at a very

similar time that I was speaking
to a really great sales, sales

rep slash set. They were a
player coach, and they were in

an organisation that wouldn't do
commission, and they hated it,

right? They hated it. They
really felt like it was stopping

them bringing in talent, and
ultimately they left because of

it. So I had these two twin
views of here's where it's

definitely not working. And
Sarah absolutely swear in blind

that it does, and it was a key
part of the success. So I was

very curious, and I absolutely
leaned in, and I left the dinner

going, do you know what? This
really makes sense. This could

be the new model. Would I do? It
absolutely not. Is the is the

answer? I'm not brave enough. It
all made logical sense at a

level. But yeah, I'm building a
team here at revved up, and I'm

absolutely going to build it on
a commission base. I just can't,

I cannot shift my mindset so
radically from sales being

connected to some some kind of
commission step too far for me.

But it really made sense when
they were explaining it and they

they swap line.

Mark Ackers: Let's try and get
them on as a as a guest. Here's

something else I've been really
critical of Mark in on LinkedIn.

It doesn't happen often, but
maybe one in 40 or 50

conversations I have sales
development teams in particular

report into marketing. Just
gonna put out there. Don't like

it? It's not for me. What do you
think?

Mark Walker: Oh, this is a good
one. Then I think it's going to

become more common, and I'm
actually in favour of it.

Mark Ackers: Oh, God, right.
Okay, let's have this

conversation then. So should I
start with why I don't like it?

Please, please. Yeah. So first
of all, actually, it largely

leans into kind of what you've
said is wrong, how they're

measured differently. It's a
little bit like the problem I've

had in the past with outbound
telesales agencies. I've dabbled

with them in the past, but I've
always felt like their agenda

was different to mine. They
wanted to be able to say, there

you go, there's 10 leads. We've
done our job. But I'm like,

Yeah, but these are 10 crap
leads that they're no good, but

they're measured on the volume.
I need the quality, and maybe

largely the reason you're in
favour of it is because you want

to instal the right behaviours.
Maybe that's what we're going to

get to. But I've always felt
like, if you're at SDR in sales

development, normally, you're
Junior, right? You're young in

your career, that's the starting
point. Of course, there's

exceptions of where people are
just really all about sales

development. They don't want to
leave their own. Little bit

older in their career, but
largely when you start in their

role, you're relatively new to
the world of sales, like maybe a

couple of years in at most, when
I think of all the skills that

you need to have as a modern day
prospector right now, when I

started out, really, you had to
be good at cold calling and mail

merge. That was it. Now you've
got to be great at cold calling,

and that's about to get a lot
harder come September. You've

got to be great at emailing,
like, if your bounce rate is

more than sorry, if your sort of
response rate where people say

this is spam is like, more than
5% you get blacklisted. So

you've got to be great at cold
calling, great at emailing,

which is, you know, creative
writing. You've got to be great

at social selling, really,
that's what we're saying. Now

you've got to be great at video,
greater voicemail and voice

note. You've got to be a
creative thinker, you've got to

be a researcher. You've got to
be able to use, I think the

average rep has something like
21 things they've got to log

into. You've got to be able to
use all these different tech

stacks. And I think when you
think that, then that's, by the

way, the just skill set. You've
got to have the right mindset.

You're going to have cold
calling, anxiety and reluctance.

You're going to have imposter
syndrome. You're going to have

need for need for approval.
You're gonna have supportive buy

cycle. You're gonna need to be
able to negotiate objection,

handle you're gonna be there to
need to deal with rejection and

pick yourself up. And every
week, you start zero. Every

month, you start a zero. Every
day, you can still save your day

as an SDR by booking a meeting
at the very last minute. I know

I'm just skimming the surface.
By the way, of all the things

the modern day prospect has got
to be able to do. The thought of

having a marketing manager that
hasn't, and this is to keep it

that hasn't lived that role, to
me, is nuts. And actually, I

feel like it's unfair for
leadership to expect a marketing

manager who has, critically,
hasn't done that role to be able

to coach and develop an SDR
across all those things to the

right level, to keep them in a
job. Because let's be really

clear, if you're crap at sales
as an SDR, you're not supported.

You're sacked. So I feel like
you're letting them down by not

giving them a manager that is
great at these things, because

they've lived and done it to
coach and support them. I'm sat

here feeling like I've given you
a grenade there, and there's no

way you can come back from that,
but you're in support of it

Mark Walker: over to you, yeah,
no. So it's a very compelling

argument that you've you've
given, and a lot of it

resonates. But I think there's,
there is an alternative way. So

a lot of the skills that you've
just described right, the

ability to write creatively,
tell a good story, do research,

manage a bunch of tools at
scale. How do they all connect

together? Making sure that you
can social sell so many of the

tools and skill sets that you've
just described are core

marketing, almost everything,
bar cold calling and the ability

to face a human telling. You
know, every day is a little bit

more in the camp of my mind of
marketing, right? So a lot of

what you described is why I
think it's moving more into

marketing. So instead of having
20 SDRs whose sole role is to

just smash the phone every day.
You've now getting 234, SDRs who

are acting almost like demand
generation managers to figure

out what's the campaign angle,
what's the tooling we're going

to build? How do we resonate
with all of these prospects, and

how do we manage this suite of
tools to get the responses that

we need at scale? That skill set
tends to be lending itself a

little bit more to the
creativity and campaign driven

thinking of marketing, the
behavioural attribution piece

that you mentioned. I actually
do think we're we ultimately

land on the same page there,
right, which is you have to have

the right goals in place. So
again, marketing, managing,

SDRs, need to make sure that
those meetings booked ultimately

drive revenue. So it's about
quality, not just quantity. And

that's just how you set up good.
Good goal link, right? You

always try and have the counter
measures. You don't get too

extreme with one over the other.
Pure quality, you don't get

enough volume. Pure volume, you
don't get enough quality. So

that's easy to easy to overcome
with the right kind of goals and

metrics. And quite frankly, I've
seen SDR teams reporting to

sales that had entirely the
wrong metrics themselves, right?

It was just meetings books, and
they didn't convert. So yeah,

that that problem happens in
both cases. I think the point

around marketing not necessarily
having lived the roles, they

don't understand how to coach
reps, particularly with

rejection, right? That's really
hard, picking up the phone and

being told f off several times a
day, right? That that's not an

experience most marketers will
have, so that's really

difficult, but it doesn't
preclude you setting them up

with a coaching relationship,
with an AE or with someone in

sales leadership to upskill them
on that side of their role,

where they sit. Doesn't it
doesn't squarely mean they have

to sit in sales, and I do think.
70, 80% of that skill set is

more lending itself to
marketing. And then the 20, 25%

whatever it is that marketers
might not have, I think you can

cope. You can set them up with a
great coaching relationship.

Mark Ackers: Hey, sales leaders,
do you want a cost effective way

to develop your team skills and
help them smash their quotas? My

sales coach offers team
memberships for just 20 pounds

per month per individual plus
VAT, this will give your reps

access to small group tactical
coaching sessions, daily power

hours and exclusive events, all
led by world class sales coaches

with over 25 group sessions to
choose from monthly. There's

something for every role we
have. Sessions for SDRs all the

way up to CROs. Empower your
team to perform to their best.

Visit my sales coach.com to get
started. The link is in the

description. Good job. Mark. I
mean that legitimately. So the

bit that I straight away, we go
back to the very first thing you

said, I'm in total agreement. I
just, I've just seen it play out

over the last couple of years.
SDR teams shrinking, that that

that is just happening, right?
And And technology is enabling

those to do more. So like
bloated SDR teams, I totally

accept are done. I really like
the phrase, it's gone from an

army to a SWAT team. I kind of
really buy into that. It's nice.

I feel like the bit that I sort
of emphasise twice that's

critical and I still sit with is
I think they need to have done

the role. And the reason I say
that, and this might just be a

me thing, but I'm keen to get
your take. I feel like I have to

believe my manager has done it
for me to do it. I almost like I

can't follow someone that's not
walked the path they're asking

me to walk. And that might just
be me. Obviously there's a pun

there with your last name, but
there we are. And the reason I

said that so just, just, uh, I
won't say who, but a month ago,

spoke to a sales leader, new to
new enrol. There was CRO and

they said one of the big
problems is their sales manager

has come over from a marketing
role. They're now the manager of

the sales team. They've been a
manager for the sales team for

three years, and they've never
sold a thing. And I sort of

called that. I was like, sorry,
I actually did this on purpose.

I said they've not sold anything
for three months, just because I

wanted them to say again, no,
three years. I wanted them to

say that out loud again. And I
was I didn't act surprised. I

was surprised, and I thought
there's no way I could work for

someone that's never sold. I
struggle with that, and I think

that's my point being in what is
a high pressured role, an ever

demanding role, a monotonous
role, to have a manager that

hasn't done it. Now I can
totally say you can be in sales

and move to marketing like you
can marketing to sales, but I

think you convinced me on the
skill set roles in into very

much a marketing role, demand
gen I totally buy into that. I

still think when the going gets
tough, I want to know my manager

has walked that path before and
really lived it. Because I think

the second you have a difficult
conversation with manager and

you're like, you don't get it,
you've not done it, I feel like

that becomes a really difficult
relationship. What do you think

Mark Walker: it's a really great
challenge? I've got mixed views

on it, right, which is, and
maybe this is, this is too much,

because I'm in a I'm in a seat
now as a founder and a CEO,

where I will absolutely be
managing functions that I've

never done before. I have never
led HR, I've never led finance,

but I'm still going to be
expected to manage them, and I

just need to learn and
understand the bits that I

haven't done right? And I so I
think as you, as you climb any

career ladder, and you become
more and more towards an

executive level, you will just
find yourself managing functions

that you haven't done
themselves, right? It you can't

have possibly done every role by
the time you hit some sort of

exec level, whether that's
marketing or or sales. You know,

if you when I've led marketing,
I've had to make decisions

around performance marketing
without ever actually having

done it before, right? So, and I
would like to think I've done a

pretty good job in these roles,
and because I'm deeply curious

and I learn, and I'm also quite
authentic, and I will tell

someone I haven't done this
before. My job as a leader isn't

always to have the exact answer
is to ask the right questions

and provide coaching and
guidance and so on, right so I

think with the right leader in
marketing, so long as they are

not trying to portray themselves
as, like, I know best, this is

how i i would do it, because you
can't, right? But if you can

say, Oh, interesting that you're
having this challenge, and what

have you tried to do to overcome
it? Have you spoken to so and so

in the sales team, like, I think
they had a similar challenge,

but you can, as a leader, manage
people in functions you haven't

led before. So my overall view,
and that is just true, right?

It's categorically true. It
happens all the time in lots of

businesses. I do take your
point, though, that there is a

certain mentality, particularly
in sales. If you haven't done

the job, you just don't get how
to face sometimes. So building

that rapport and credibility. So
in this specific scenario, can

be a little bit can be a little
bit tougher. So overarchingly, I

believe you can lead a function
that you haven't done itself, so

long as you are a good leader.
But I do take your point it's a

little bit more tricky in this
specific scenario. And again,

Mark Ackers: great counter
argument, right? These are

strong blows we're sending each
other and we're dealing with

what the reason I say that is, I
buy into that. You know, as the

co founder at my sales coach, I
wear hats that I've never worn

before. You know, like everyone
jokes I'm the HR manager. Like,

don't have any clue about HR,
right? But I think, I think

we're saying the same thing when
I say that. I picture bigger

companies, I think, in the
smaller startup life, yeah, you

have to wear different hats. And
actually, that is the blessing

and the curse of a startup is
you, you get to wear these

different hats. But God, those
hats can be heavy and

uncomfortable at times, but
talking of So, yeah, you're

founder led selling. Now, how
have you found being the seller

and the founder. How have you
found that? I love it

Mark Walker: ice. Most fun I've
had in in in quite a long time.

It's a different type of sale,
right? There is a, almost a

cheat code, right? Which is, if
you are the founder, you just,

you don't just get the sale,
right? I wish, but you do get a

certain level of credibility
built out that this product

you're about to show someone and
the conversation you're about to

have with them is built Yeah,
it's it's not a playbook handed

to you by someone else. It's
genuinely your vision, your

belief in how the world should
be, what the challenges are. And

I mean, again, even more so in
this scenario, I'm selling a

product that I wanted to have as
a chief revenue officer, right?

I've lived selling to CMOs and
CROs, having been a sales and

marketing leader. So there's a
huge amount of fun, right?

Because you're basically having
a peer to peer conversation with

people. So that is a little bit
of a cheat code. And what's the

challenges? Hang on, what's the
question again, just, how am I

finding it? How are you finding
found the lead selling, going

back to the point, an enormous
amount of fun, I think maybe one

of the challenges is making sure
you do not get carried away with

from missing things that you're
set your that your tech team

can't deliver, right? And I've
been, I'm not a developer, but

I've been on calls with other
founders where they've promised

something and then it just sends
the whole business up in arms

because it completely changes
the roadmap, or it's very, very

difficult to deliver. And you
know, you kind of have that

power, so it's about not
exercising it and being like

accepting the restraints, which
is actually quite difficult to

sometimes have that self
discipline and say, I'm selling

this product that I have today,
not this vision that will be

here two years from now, or even
six months from now. And

actually in the very early days
when the product was MVP and

very nascent, that was, I wasn't
great at that, right? Because

you kind of needed to sell a bit
more than you had there and

then. But as the products
evolved, and it's now a genuine,

fully fledged product. It's much
easier to sell what is in front

of me today than try and sell
what's coming six months from

now. And it's also the other
thing is, we are BEC backed. So

when you're fundraising, that's,
that is a sales process, but

it's a very different sales
process, and when you're trying

to fundraise sell and product
sell, it's really important you

don't let those two things
converge, because, again, you're

going to be selling a massive
vision to someone that wants

functionality when they buy it.
Equally, you don't want to sell

a VC on the functionality you
have today, because they're

they're not invest in. So

Mark Ackers: there's a lot there
that I can relate to. I think

just taking it back to the
start, founder and selling is a

lot of fun, but it's hard as
well. Yeah, cheat code is

definitely an interesting
phrase, because I get exactly

what you mean. There are deals
that I know I can do that it

wouldn't be fair to expect
anyone in my team to be able to

do and that purely comes down to
the title that you have. In my

case, co founder and head of
sales. And there'll be deals

that you can do that you won't
be able to replicate with other

people that come into the team.
And again, it wouldn't be fair

for you to expect them to do
that. But I think that's the

chasm that is so difficult to
cross when you break from

founder led selling and having
sales people in place. And then

the bit you talk about that,
really, I call that staying in

your swim lane. You know? I
remember the early days of

refract. I remember the early
days of my sales coach. You've

got your swim lane, but you've
got someone saying, Oh, if it

could just do that, we can make
it do that. No problem. But then

when we were. Guilty this at
refract would build features for

one person, and that would
really shift your roadmap, push

back the feature didn't quite
work, or they didn't really use

it, and then no one else really
adopted it, and you'd constantly

move out your swim lane. I mean,
it sounds like that, something

you're very conscious of, revved
up is maybe in the early days it

was harder, but you're really
focused on your swim lane. So I

can, I can totally relate to
that. But founder led selling is

just difficult, isn't it like,
in the sense of, whilst a lot of

fun, to not break out of your
swim lane and and to say no to

people, particularly when you're
VC backed. But then here's the

other thing that that is true.
If you sign up a crappy

customer, in the sense of poor
fit, and you've tried to fit

square peg in a round hole,
you're the one that tells the

board they've signed up. You're
the one that tells them they've

churned and it's on you. And I
suppose there is that that hat

and that responsibility that you
have to wear. And it's a real

it's a real tightrope, isn't

Mark Walker: it? It definitely
is, yeah. And the other inherent

challenge with founder led sales
is, you're a small business,

right? So you don't have all of
the brand and tailwinds that

come from being a large
organisation. At that point. You

don't have a huge marketing
budget. You know, the brand

often is you right, going out on
to LinkedIn and so on. So

there's, there's plenty of
challenges, but yeah, to your

point, if you, if you fudge
things a little bit and you try

and sell to someone that you
know isn't quite a good fit, but

you want the win for the
quarter, you you know you're on

the hook for that the following
quarter. If they churn going

back to the very first point, I
would never knowingly sell to

someone that I didn't think
could get value from the

product, because there is just
no point, right? You are just

going to invite churn, but in
the really early days, you are

finding product market fit, and
you don't know whether it is

going to work or not. And those,
those have been a couple of

painful experiences, right,
where we've had clients that

it's just for whatever reason,
it's just not quite worked, but

that's just the process of
learning and growing, and you

get better and you refine every
quarter, and churn starts to get

lower, and your revenue gets
higher. And that's how you're

building a business.

Mark Ackers: And part of that is
your responsibility as the

founder, to take risks, to try
new things, right? Like I

remember in the first year at my
sales coach, we said we should

be experimenting every week
experiment, try new things and

and that's almost like your duty
to try and build the best

version of the business. And you
know, you would have sat there

like I did with a whiteboard,
thinking, Okay, this is what the

business is going to be. This
how we're going to do it. And

then you get out there and
you're like, Okay, we need to

make some changes, and we need
to make them quickly. And then,

I don't know about you, we've
we've made a change. Oh no,

let's go back. Oh no, let's make
this change. Let's go back. And

I'm sure that's the journey
you're going on. Let's hear

about revved up, because I'm
conscious of time, so revved up

is a business I'm somewhat
familiar with, but I don't want

to make any assumptions. Let's
go back to how you described me

when I first sold to you. Let's
not make those assumptions. Why

don't you, first of all tell me
who's the ideal person that, if

you could get an inbound demo
request from someone, what's

their perfect job title and
company?

Mark Walker: Yeah, for sure. So
if I take the medic framework to

an extent I'd have to right, and
the economic buyer would be

either the CMO or a CRO who
actually looks after marketing,

right? But it's fundamentally
the most senior marketer in the

business. Would we would want to
be sponsoring the product, and

then, in an ideal scenario, we
would have at least two

champions. One of them, our
primary champion, would be head

of demand, Gen smaller business,
maybe head of marketing, but

they're effectively on the hook
for delivering qualified

pipeline to the sales team. And
then, crucially, we would

ideally have a second champion
who runs sales, right because

the product that we are selling
is Account Based Marketing, and

ABM, while he's got marketing.
The title is inherently a team

sport, and if you do not have
sales bought into it, the whole

thing will fall flat. So it
comes back to this sales,

marketing alignment
conversation.

Mark Ackers: So let's start
there in your own words. I know

maybe for many listeners, an
obvious question, but I want, I

want your words. What is Account
Based Marketing? There

Mark Walker: probably is a
dictionary definition of it. I'm

going to give you two two
answers so that this simple

theoretical answer to what is
ABM is it is marketing that

targets a specific set of
accounts that are predefined,

and you customise all of your
content and all of your

campaigns to resonate
specifically with each one of

those accounts and the key
stakeholders within those

accounts. So that's like the as
close to my textbook destination

as you can get. And then the
question is, well, what does

that mean? Right? What's the
kind of workflow around a good

you. Good ABM like a good ABM
motion would be good account

selection, and we can double
click into anything that you

want, but let me give you the
high level. But you firstly,

you've got to select the right
accounts. Then you need to do

deep research and understanding
into those accounts. What's

their context? What are their
drivers? What are their goals,

what are their challenges, and
who is the most likely buying

committee and influences within
the account? What are their

motivations? What are their
drivers, and so on. Then you

need to have a great angle
that's built off of the

research, like, how are we going
to attack this account? Like,

what's uniquely valuable about
our business to them to their

business. And then you need to
customise all of your content to

that account. So you've got to
really show you've done the work

to understand their context and
how that connects back to your

value proposition. And then you
need to execute the campaign,

and that's usually across
multiple channels. You've got to

show up where the stakeholders
are and where that account is

multiple times, and often that
does start from brand building,

because if you if the account
doesn't know you, sometimes you

just have to build that
familiarity and awareness with

your business before you can
actually start to break into the

account and have conversations.
Which is why ABM tends to be a

longer cycle to actually start
to see results, and that's why

you reserve it for these larger
organisations who are going to

be very meaningful to your
revenue line.

Mark Ackers: And how imperative
would you say great Account

Based Marketing is in today's
sales landscape.

Mark Walker: I mean, I'm
building a whole business around

it. So you would imagine my
answer is, it is very

imperative, like bland marketing
and bland campaigns that don't

directly speak to specific
accounts and the individuals

within them are just noise.
They're just noise. And it's so

easy to scale noisy campaigns
through automation and AI, it's

still much more difficult to
actually get to the level of

depth that's required for ABM.
That that's what helps cut

through. Now there's also
typically motions or campaign

touch points within ABM that
cannot be scaled through AI or

digital. For example, I would
almost always have some kind of

breakfast or dinner or in
person. Touch point for an ABM

campaign, right? Because you are
saying I am willing to invest

the time and money to get you in
a room with peers, and I'm going

to spend the time and expense of
calibrating this event just for

you, right? It's on a topic that
we know is going to resonate

with you and your business, and
you're going to meet your peers.

That type of cut through is very
different than, yeah, Can I

record you a 32nd loom video?
Right? So it's just a different

level of weight that goes along
with these ABM campaigns, and

if, but if you don't have them,
it's, it's very difficult to cut

through to these accounts. And
would you say again, you know,

you're building a business in
this you live in this world.

When you speak to organisations,
what kind of percent do you

think can really get an Account
Based Marketing? Right? Very

few. Right now. Where's the
quick fixes, the fixes with

organisations that are not doing
ABM correctly right? What are

the what are the quick fixes
here again, they might have not

been identifying the right
accounts to go after in the

first place, so having better
intelligence, better decision

making frameworks around who are
the right accounts to go after

is potentially a really quick
fix to the level and depth of

research that you need on that
account can be really time

consuming and take whole teams.
If businesses aren't leveraging

AI and available tools, then
they're probably really missing

something, and therefore they're
making their ABM campaigns far

more expensive than they need to
be. And the third one, and maybe

I should have started with this,
because really, this is where I

I see most of them derail. Is
the sales and marketing

alignment, right? ABM is a
marketing driven initiative.

They want it to drive leads, or
MQLs and the sales team are not

bought in, and it's not all
coordinated together, or they

are broadly aligned, but it's a
fight over who's going to claim

the attribution for the success
of the campaign. Sales is trying

to call up the accounts outside
of the agreed cycle, because

they want to be able to claim
that they got got it over of the

line, right? Or marketing is
deliberately, yeah, trying to

consume sales with a particular
activity and claim the credit,

right? So honestly, the
organisations that I'm speaking

to or working with, where the
quickest fix would be, it's

around getting those teams
aligned,

Mark Ackers: and this sets us up
nicely. I'd love for you to now

just share with us how does
revved up? Help with all of

this. If I'm sales leader, CRO,
responsible for marketing

demand, Gen, and I'm buying into
what you're saying. Wanna hear

more about revved

Mark Walker: up? So revved up
helps with three of the core

components that I've just spoken
about. So revved up will do

unbelievable amounts of research
on the account and the

stakeholders within the account.
So you end up with this

incredible dossier of
information and insight into the

account and the stakeholders,
the likes that it would have

taken multiple people many, many
days and man hours to pull

together. So that gives you the
base of a really strong ABM

campaign. Now, the second thing
that revved up does is it takes

that content and that research,
it matches it to your unique

value proposition, and then it
pulls together really compelling

content that will allow you to
cut through to this account with

a unique point of view and a
unique value proposition

tailored to the needs of the
account, right? So again, often,

many days can be spent in
workshops trying to figure out,

how do we translate this
research into content revved up?

Does that? Does that for you,
out the box? And then the third

piece is, we make it really easy
to connect all that content to

all different channels, so you
can run that multi, multi touch

campaign, not just email, not
just LinkedIn, but actually

helping you create thought
leadership that can go out to

your sales team so they feel a
part of it. They're they're

empowered and enabled to drive
the ABM campaign and build their

brand, PPC, bespoke landing
pages, right? The whole shebang

is, managed out of revved up. So
you really get this kind of out

of the box ABM pod with the
platform,

Mark Ackers: amazing. Thanks. So
thanks for bringing that to

life. I'd love to send people
your way. Obviously, it sounds

like every week you're at an
event, they'll probably see you,

social butterfly that you are.
Obviously, I'm guessing LinkedIn

is the most obvious place to
find you, right? So, Mark Walker

on LinkedIn, revved up. For
those not watching, listening,

how do we spell revved up?
Where's the website? How do we

find you?

Mark Walker: Yeah, for sure. So
revved up is R, E, double, V, E,

D, u, p, revved up all one
word.ai, revved up.ai. Is the

website and then, yeah,
LinkedIn, for sure, my LinkedIn

handle is pretty easy. It's J,
F, D, I, Mark, just fucking do

it. Mark, it's been, been a
mantra of mine for many, many

years. So easy to find me, or,
yeah, just search Mark Walker at

revved up. Well,

Mark Ackers: that's that's a
great LinkedIn handle, and that

brings us to the end of the
podcast. We just fucking did it

to take up your your mantra. And
loved having you on Mark. I knew

this would be a great episode.
As I say, we've not really

explored that sales and
marketing side before, and as a

ex marketer myself, I was really
keen to have that conversation

with you. I think there's some
great debates, you know, a few

things where you definitely
challenge my thoughts. Hopefully

I've done that with you as well,
but hopefully, and I trust the

listeners, got a load out of
this episode as well. So thanks

for coming on. Thanks for
sharing your story, and best of

luck. We've revved up, and I'm
sure I'll see an event at some

point in the future. Thanks

Mark Walker: so much, Mark. It's
been a lot of fun. Appreciate

having me you.