Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
The west has transcended human limitations to discover that humans are nothing more than purposeless lumps of chemicals like any other life organism.
Tired of being gaslit by progressive media?
Wanna fight back against deceptive narratives being pushed across the globe?
At the Lucas Skrobot show we tear down cultural & geopolitical events giving you the context you need to expose the worldviews driving the cultural agendas of our day.
Ultimately connecting back to why it matters to your world, and how to order our lives and society to own the future.
Join Lucas Skrobot and follow the show on your favorite podcasts app today to understand the world, discern the truth, own the future.
After millenniums of mankind, uh,
excuse me, people kind celebrating
and fighting for humanity.
We have finally turned the corner
as Western society into a new
enlightened era, just to think.
Ugh, just to think that for thousands
of years, Hundreds upon hundreds of
generations have been celebrating
the new birth of their children or
the prosperity of their communities.
Imagine those archaic societies that
used to fight and strive for the
survival of humanity that actually
thought that mankind, excuse me, human.
With something special, like it
is different or special that we
can talk, communicate, invent,
engineer, write, tell stories.
uh, the foolishness to think that at
one point we were so stupid to think
that we had a soul or a spirit or were
any different than mammals, reptiles,
rodents, or even the insects around us.
No, no, no.
That time of foolish thinking has passed.
And the collective mind of humanity is
awakening to the new and old undisputed
truth that we are in fact, the plague to
nature that our very existence is imoral.
So imoral in fact that we have
come to the enlightened mind
that there are no such thing.
As morals or virtues or values or
standards that all of that is just
the patriarchal tyrannical, colonial
oppressive tool designed to oppress
and enslave you to strive for
excellence, purity, virtue, which
as we have come to know are the most
base things in society, even, even
society itself, that is just a facade.
As inflation begins to wipe out savings
and businesses and homes across the globe.
We are only now beginning to learn and
see that that really is a good thing.
After all isn't global poverty, a
good and virtual thing to strive for.
Just imagine, imagine a world where
we're all starving, not just some.
Imagine a world where we had no cars
or electricity and we were, and we
were forced to live off the land.
Nature would finally have a time
to heal and without modern medicine
or even antibiotics, the global
population would plummet in no time.
And so we can thank the fed and Biden
for making America and the world a moral.
More morally, just place.
Not that we believe in morals or
justice, but you know, you see people
not being able to afford to eat or put
gas in their cars or make their rent
payments or are losing their retirements.
Those things ought to be
welcomed and embraced now.
Not all the world has come
to this enlightened state
that America has come to.
So what about those backwards countries
that think that work ethic and growing
their family and providing for their
children and their grandchildren.
What about those countries that are
so filled with hate and backwards,
thinking that they refuse to let Disney
Disney, they refuse to let Disney and
doctrinated their young children, their.
With their L G B T Q I a S
two element O P Q R S U V.
Plus agenda.
Oh, oh, oh, oh, those nations
that are teaching their children,
that there are only two genders.
Those nations that are refusing
to show five year olds, lesbians
kissing in cartoons on screens.
Oh, those horrible nations that say.
Abortion is murder and they
outlawed in their land.
What about those backwards nations?
Don't worry.
Don't worry.
They're gonna get what's coming to them.
Their kids are gonna
be more well adjusted.
Their land will be blessed.
Their economies will grow.
Their societies will
be strong and healthy.
Their families will have
strong family bonds.
They will prosper because they
are holding onto a few simple
moral values and biological facts.
But now see, we know that prosperity
we've come to the enlightened stage that
we know that prosperity is a bad thing.
And being poor is oh, so virtuous
healthy families are merely a cloak
of oppression cuz the family unit
it's just tyrannical patriarch.
Under the guise of something
nice and pretty, and being happy.
Who needs being happy?
Don't worry.
Those nations will get the happiness
and prosperity that are coming to them.
Just, just you wait and see, but us,
us enlightened ones, us who really
know how the world ought to be, how
humanity ought to be or ought not be.
We will disintegrate into angst and
anger and despair and poverty, and
thereby we will reach the pinnacle
of our enlightenment, which is
to realize that there is no such
thing as enlightenment at all.
No such thing as morality, no such
thing as values or standards or
anything that we ought to strive
for as it really would be best.
If reality and the entire universe
never existed in the first place.
Hey, it's Lucas Skrobot.
And you're listening to Lucas Skrobot
show where we uncover purpose, pursue
truth and own the future episode 287.
It is June 16th, 2022.
And, uh, the global stock
markets are disintegrating.
As we know it, uh, POTUS president of the
United States is making waves earlier.
He stated that he was not going to
have strong ties or negotiate with
Saudi Arabia, but now it looks like
in about a week or two, he's going
to get on a plane to go to Saudi.
Uh, he says it's for other reasons, but
a lot of people, I think we all know
it's to beg for there to be some reprieve
into the inflation that he caused.
Do you remember to remember back
when he became president in 2001?
One of the first things that president
Joe Biden did as president was to sign an
executive order to cancel the Keystone XL
pipeline, which was gonna pump millions.
And millions of gallons into
America from the Arctic every day.
But he canceled that pipeline.
Now there are course some critics
that say, well, the, the pipeline has
nothing to do with the gas shortage
that we're experiencing right now.
It has nothing to do with the
inflation that we're seeing right now.
The, this, this has nothing
to do with economic policies.
It wasn't, it wasn't until just
a few moments ago that many in
the administration and even the
federal reserve even were willing
to accept that inflation was coming.
But I mean, we've been talking
about it here for over a year.
Now, many other people have been
talking about inflation for months now.
So this is nothing new.
This is nothing.
New here is a brilliant little cut up
by the Washington post of a before and
after of the president, Joe Biden and,
uh, other players in the fed commenting
on how they really don't believe.
That inflation is going to be coming.
Our experts believe in the data shows
that most of the price increases
we've seen are, were expected
and, and expected to be temporary.
There's nobody suggesting
there's inflation on the why
20, 21, no serious economist.
I want every American to know that I'm
taking inflation, uh, very seriously.
And it's my top for domestic priority.
Now that was in just a couple days ago.
Now here is yelling from the
chair of the fed there, a risk
of inflation treasury secretary.
Um, I, I think there's a small
risk and I think it's manageable.
That was back March 14th, 2021.
I believe it's transitory, but I don't
mean to suggest that these pressures
will disappear in the next month or two.
I that's October 12th, 2021.
And here it.
May 31st, 20, 22.
I think I was wrong then about, um, the
path that inflation, um, would take.
I really do at at least she's
willing to admit that she was wrong.
Many people won't even go that
far to say, ah, I was wrong.
I missed it.
I got it wrong.
They, they go on pretending
as if they had it right.
The whole time here is,
uh, the federal reserve.
Juror not expect that will
be in a situation where
inflation rises to trouble.
Troubling levels.
Inflation is likely to take longer
to return to our price stability
goal than previously expected.
We believe it's temporary.
Here's a com commerce of secretary Gina.
I'm hopeful with a little bit of
time with the investments that
Congress has to make in workforce, in
manufacturing, in infrastructure, we
will be able to keep a lid on inflation.
So clearly we are, and Americans
are struggling with inflation.
I still think, uh, you know, we
will get inflation under control.
We just have to stick with
it and see it through.
See what.
See infrastructure, see the green
new deal through is that what we need
to see through to see more, uh, more
money being printed as if we think that
money being printed in the velocity
of money in society has nothing to do
with the inflation that we're seeing
or that the monetary policies that
are in place to have anything to do
with the inflation that we're seeing.
See what through, what does
Congress and the Senate need to
put through the green new deal?
That's the.
The green new deal is the
solution to inflation.
Where are you gonna get that money?
Oh, you're gonna print it.
What is that gonna do?
It's gonna cause more inflation.
So it's a, it's a bad look.
It's a bad deal.
Uh, apparently just now.
The us government is coming into tune
that there is a problem with inflation.
We've been saying here and again,
I actually, I do not think that
we're going to see like the Y mark
Republic where inflation just is
going absolutely berserk growing 30%,
40% every month, or even every day.
Used to be.
I think where, and many other economists
think that as the feds begin to raise
interest rates, it will actually send
us into a repression and a lost decade,
much like Japan, where there was massive,
massive inflation taking place across
Japan in the late eighties, early
nineties, you, uh, a hun 10 square meters
in downtown Tokyo would be selling for
$300,000 and then the bubble burst.
and everything became so deflationary
that no one was really moving or
selling anything because the next
day everything would be cheaper.
The next day, everything would be
cheaper because in such a deflationary
market, and those are much those
recessionary, deflationary depression
markets are much harder to dig
yourself out of than massive inflation.
We got a comment recently on the
YouTube channel, which by the way, if
you watch or listen on YouTube, this
show's gonna be a week late as we had
a strike against our account from a,
uh, a video that we created over almost
a year ago, where we were quoting
statistics from the vers website.
And we were also.
Uh, talking about why there were
certain sediments, uh, certain
feelings across different nations
regarding some of the medical
policies that were being put forth.
Well, apparently you
can't even report on that.
Apparently you can't even talk
about what people are thinking
without that being, uh, censored.
And why is this?
Well, we talked about that last
episode in episode 286 with.
They're now being, it's not now.
It's not as it's just, just happened, but
in the UN they, there's an article of our
human rights that are given to us article
20.2, which state that actually there's
a lot of speech that is restricted.
Anything that could be deemed as dangerous
or an incitement to hate or violence.
We're incitement to discrimination.
And with that is, uh, speech that is an
incitement to, uh, medical or in pandemic.
So we had a strike for just accounting
and reporting and talking about what
people are thinking and why people are
thinking it across different nations.
But apparently you can't talk about
what people's opinions are or aren't
because you can only tow the party line.
We had a comment on YouTube from,
uh, and you can go and read it.
It's from . The screen
name is illicit mind.
So I think, uh, illicit mind if
you're listening, if you're watching.
Thank you.
Thank you for leaving your comment.
And I thought, instead of responding to
you back into the comment section, we
would just do it right here on the show.
So Elit mind he wrote.
And this is record regarding, uh,
the episode on abolishing the family
in antinatalism, which is the belief
that it is morally reprehensible
and criminal to procreate.
It is criminal to have children.
This is what you'll, I'll read and
you'll listen to what illicit mind says.
So it starts with him saying
a disregarded, uh, point that
he made a question that he.
In a comment.
And he says, it seems a lot of times
Anana analysts who are having to explain
their position and clarification.
When in fact it should be the NIST
who ought to be the ones explaining
theirs since they are the ones who
are essentially engaging in an actual
brute action antinatalism or Anette
Naus are ultimately doing nothing.
So this is this belief
that if you do nothing.
If you're doing nothing, you
can't actually be charged.
That's actually not criminal.
When actually there's many
situations where if you do nothing,
you are being held responsible.
So non is, is actually action.
So we'll start there.
Uh, and yes, in fact, Naus have been
around since the beginning of time
and it's something that's biological.
We are biologically created to procreate.
Every species, human non-human.
So it's a funny argument to say
that Naus people who choose to have
children need to explain why it
is morally right to have children.
And yet he's saying those who are having
children are committing an Abru action.
It is.
Anyways, we'll call it on it more.
He goes on antinatalism he says is a
stance more than anything, especially
in particular, when it comes, when it's
compared to a political means it is a
position a person could hold that inputs,
a negative ethical value to procreation.
Antinatalism at its core, seeks
to display and point out the
lack of ethics to childbirth.
Along with the nature of
existence, he says, there's no
unified goal to the philosophy.
As you mentioned, the prominent
implication to this philosophy
is to encourage others to abstain
ethically from procreating.
And one could argue a
way to go about that.
Is EDUC so through the political
avenue, but that stated example
is a suggested connotation, not a
focal matter matter, nor deliberate
stated point to antinatalism.
So verse says, well, I'm not talking
about antinatalism has nothing
to do with the political means.
We're not actually
trying to push something.
Politically goes on to say the philosophy
is centered around talking to people.
Let, let alone talking to
people over the internet.
I think he's what he is saying.
It's talking to people face to face,
not talking to people about it over
the internet, even though he has a, a
YouTube channel where he talks about
it over the internet, he says it is a
one to one person to person discourse
with others reading and listening.
Okay.
So he says that we're, we're not
trying to have a political movement.
This is.
Ideas that we're pushing really?
We're not doing anything.
We're just asking questions.
It's like, you know, it's like the 22
year old drug dealer going to young
middle school and high school students.
We're not actually making them take drugs.
We're just saying, Hey,
have you ever tried this?
Have you ever thought about
trying this, you know, eating
healthy and having all your teeth?
Is that really a good thing?
Do you really want all your teeth?
You know, what, if you take this
drug, you could lose your teeth.
Wouldn't that be great.
I mean, think about it.
You could have fun, but you
know, that, that drug, dealer's
not really doing anything.
No.
The, the promotion of a philosophy that
is at its core and when it's played out,
seeks to just like end the human race.
I don't see how that is
helpful in any way, shape or.
He'll go on.
Tell me why you see fault with
the core of the philosophy.
Not a, not a theoretically let alone
unlikely subset that the philosophy
could get rise to political movement.
Speaking your comments failed to
point out the lack of merit to the
actual philosophy in and of itself.
And it looks instead of nitpick
the flimsy corner piece to what
could actually happen in a probable
scenario, which no one is currently.
Prominently promoting
anyhow to red herring.
So he's saying by looking at what the
philosophy actually believes and you
say, okay, well, what happens if people
by and large adopt this philosophy?
Would it have a good
outcome or a bad outcome?
Well, it would lead to
population collapse quite soon.
You think a majority of the population,
all of a sudden adopts this idea
that having children is morally
reprehensible and it is a brute action.
They stop having children.
What happens in 60 years when the
youngest girls hit menopause and
are no longer able to have children.
The human race dies.
That's what happens.
But according to this philosophy,
the human race ought to die.
The human race in existence of itself
ought not to be around in order
for this philosophy to be held,
you have to do away with all sorts
of, uh, anything that's absolute.
You have to believe in absolute REIV.
In order for this philosophy to
make sense, because there can't
be any such thing as biology.
There can't be any such thing as,
uh, morality or even ethics because
what the argument is being made is
that our very existence is evil and
it's a complete denial of, of God.
Truly.
And we'll talk about that in a little
bit, which I'm sure, uh, elicit
mind if you're still listening.
I'm sure you're gonna take issue with,
because you're like, oh, Christ, Sue.
You're all.
Well, you, you are just one of those
backwards people who still believe in God.
Oh yeah.
So if, if you don't believe in God and
you believe in evolution, then absolutely.
If you believe that you are just a sack
of chemicals and you have no such thing
as a soul or a spirit, absolutely.
There is every reason for you to
be depressed, discouraged dismayed.
There's every reason for, for you
to hold this I ideology and this
philosophy that mankind should not exist.
Sure.
If that's what you believe, if you
don't believe there's any objective,
meaning or value to life, but it's
all just suffering in IM moral IPR.
Then, yeah, of course you're going
to that's of course going to be
the logical outcome of what you
believe heroes on, which is this is,
this is my, uh, my favorite part.
Any such fault.
You may see ought to be centered
around ethics and empathy, given
that those are the core traits
to the philosophy seeks to hold.
So his argument is antinatalism is
actually more ethical and more empathetic.
However, how can you be
empathetic if you don't even.
Value the human race, you don't
value the human experience.
You don't value your children.
And you think that you bringing
children into the world is imoral.
I love my children, but in order
for me to love my children, I have
to have interaction with them.
The thought of.
Not having my children, the, the thought
that somehow saving them and protecting
them from hardships that will surely come
in their life is more loving, is not true.
We are not, we good parents do not
keep their children's children safe.
They make their children strong.
We all will face adversity and
trial and hardship in this life.
All of us, but it's through that.
It's through.
Working together to overcome
our hardships and our trials.
Those are the things that
makes our lives meaningful.
Those are the things that bonds
our relationships together because
you can suffer and not love, but
you can't love and not suffer.
And love is really what the,
the core expression of humanity.
And of empathy.
So if you wanna be talking about being,
being empathetic, then you have to love.
And if you have to love, you have to
be in connection with one another.
With people he goes on.
I personally routinely tell people that
we are not out to force anyone from
stopping childbirth, but he doesn't
say, but I interjected that, but we
were simply having a discourse, just
like the, the, the college drug dealer,
having a discourse with middle school.
Or grooms having to discourse, groom
teachers, having to discourse with
their, uh, fourth, fifth graders and
coming out to the, uh, the closet to
their kids and having conversations
about their gender identity.
We're not forcing this on anyone.
We're just ha we're just having
a discussion says that we're
not forcing our views on anyone.
In fact, People who procreate, who impose
and force birth and death onto others,
others that could have never asked for
any such burden in the first place.
Ho honestly, I Elit mine.
I kind of feel for you because it's
clear that maybe you don't have
anxiety, but it clear, it's clear
that you see your life as a burden.
You see existence in and of itself.
As a, a torment in a torture.
And that is a, a, a very sad
place, hopeless place to be in.
So I can, I can empathize with you.
That's a hopeless place to be in.
If you feel like your entire
life is nothing but suffering.
No, be better if you were
not born, but there is hope.
There is hope if you believe in a
God, if you believe in God, if you
don't then absolutely hopeless.
So the, the argument is giving is
being RA made right now that, uh,
it is people who have babies who are
horrible because one and immoral because
they force life onto people, which
means they force death onto people.
And therefore AISM is genocide
because if you're having someone
you're forcing them to be killed.
So antinatalism is antigen.
Oh, he says atonalism does
not encourage killing.
It is not genocide.
On the other hand, nativism indirectly
is the, is the act that has the ability
to condone genocide king distinction.
Again, what he's saying is.
Because AISM brings life into
this world and then people die.
AISM having a child is the act of
genocide, cuz you're forcing death upon
the child that you brought life into.
So it's better to just
not have life at all.
Here's where it gets really amazing.
This is where, where he UND undos.
Oh, Alyssa, mind you undo your entire
argument about, well, it's just a, a
personal choice that someone should make.
And, you know, everyone
can do what they want.
We're just having a discussion, but
now all the cards come out and yet
even still, even if there was a world
where Antina, antinatalists sought
to gain political control to enforce
their views directly onto others.
And in an important technicality,
there would be no fault.
I already mentioned how procreation
by default promotes and inevitably
leads to harm that is death harm.
That is unnecessarily imposed.
It would be better not
to have ever existed.
So argument, okay.
He goes on.
We are dealing with people that are
engaging in an act that is akin,
ultimately akin to a crime, to
penalize any such person who desires
and is willing to do such a thing
follows for anyone who does not agree.
They should initially point to how
it is ethical to impose that initial
said, crime burden onto sentence.
In the first place.
I think what he's trying to say here
is if, if there was the unlikely event,
the improbable event, that there was
a political, such movement, which did
take over a nation and there was a law
that said it is imoral to procreate
and bring a life into this world.
It is a crime.
It is, it is the act of
genocide, ultimately a crime
and they should be penalized.
That, that is the, that, that is the
extent he, he followed the logical
occlusion conclusion and at least he was
consistent with that logical conclusion.
And at the end of it, it is anyone who has
kids should be punished for having kids.
My parents, he he's saying my parents
should be criminally charged with
having me, which the ironic thing is
any judge that's criminally charging.
Another person was brought into this life.
It's just such, it's just
such a cyclical thing.
And what is the result of it?
As I said, the result is in 60 years,
goodbye, human race, goodbye existence.
But in order for, for a person to
believe this, to hold this value,
to hold this thought, you have to do
away and have to break from reality.
You have to break from biology, you
have to break from the real world.
You have to adopt.
Postmodernism.
It, it, it is the outplay of Darwinism.
It's the outplay of, of postmodernism
that there is no such thing as truth.
There is no such thing as morality.
There's no such thing as,
as virtue or value in life.
And, and more importantly,
it stems from the belief that
there there's no such thing as.
Now, if you believe in a, in God,
in a monotheistic God, such as the,
what, the Jews, the Christians and
the Muslims believe they all agreed
that the three main monotheistic
faiths all agree on a few on one,
one specific passage, but they all.
All of them agree on the Torah,
which would be the old Testament.
Christianity believes in the Torah
and the new Testament and Islam.
They believe in the tour,
which is the old Testament.
They believe in the new Testament,
which is for them is called the NGO.
And they believe in the Quran.
So there is, uh, There, there is
varied things in what, all three
of the monotheistic, Abrahamic,
monotheistic Faith's belief.
But one thing that they do all agree on
is, and of course someone's gonna say,
well, actually, so and so doesn't agree on
this, whatever, you know what I'm saying?
They agree on Genesis one and the
creation story of how we got here.
And they all say, no, we didn't come
from a marsupial, swamp, and actually.
If you believe in Darwinian, macro,
not micro macro evolution, it is
mathematically impossible, mathematically
impossible, but let's say you believe
in that and you are a Christian.
Well, you're adopting all of these
ideas or, or if you believe in a
monotheistic, God, you're adopting
all these ideas that contradict
the very scripts that you believe.
So when you deny the existence of.
It is only logical.
It is only logical.
When you deny the holy scriptures, it
is only logical to say that, mm God,
didn't create man, male and female,
as it says in Genesis one, God made
them male and female, two genders.
You throw that out and you be like, well,
there's a million different genders.
There's an infinite amount.
I can't put a number on it.
Biology has nothing, no
connection to gender.
No, not, not at.
Forget all of the sciences,
forget the science.
We're not gonna follow
the science anymore.
It also says in Genesis one that God saw
that man was, and woman was very good.
All of creation.
He calls good.
And he calls man humankind,
mankind, man, and woman.
Very good and saw that
they were very good.
The pinnacle of creation might, might
I add that woman was the last thing
created the pinnacle of creation.
So there you.
Women for the win.
Then God also says be
fruitful and multiply.
So the first, the first command
that humankind, the first commission
that humankind is ever given
is be fruitful and multiply.
Take dominion over the earth, rule
over the earth, steward the earth
till the earth cause the earth to
bring forth, produce and growth.
Take Dom.
But there is a, a worldview
that is pervasive and has been
pervasive for thousands of years.
I'm sure that mankind is nothing
special, is nothing different.
We are, are nothing but mammals
and we are the, the, the ban.
Of nature and society and it would
be better if man was not here.
Yeah.
That makes sense.
In a post true society, we've
exchanged truth for lies and reason
for postmodern irrationality.
The absurd finally makes sense.
Well, Disney, if you remember, I believe
it was back in episode two hundred and
seventy nine, two hundred seventy six.
We talked about how Disney.
Again is showing their cards on
the, the ideology, the belief system
that they are, are pushing forward.
And we're gonna play a clip
from that previous episode.
But this week,
the UAE and a number of other countries,
nearly 20 other countries had decided
to ban Pixar's new film light.
Why?
Well, cause of a same sex
kissing scene, that's right.
A same sex kissing scene in which,
in which we see a, a two females
lesbian, couple holding a child, and
they're about to share a kiss, but buzz
light ear is not going to be showing.
In these theaters across the middle east,
because they're saying there is no way
that we are allowing and that we are going
to expose our children to a lesbian kiss.
We're not gonna expose five year olds
to a lesbian kiss in the theaters.
We're not going to let you
indoctrinate our children with these
imoral ideologies and worldviews.
Well, people are, are so shocked,
so shocked that, uh, that someone
would actually stand up to them,
but Disney, they don't care.
They're pushing forward with their agenda.
This is what Disney had to say
a, a few weeks ago in elite elite
meeting where a Disney exec share.
How she is planning to push and push
and push their agenda even further.
And that they're not going to stand down.
They're not going to back up.
Here's a clip it's a little
long, but it is definitely worth
listening to the whole thing.
I'm, I'm here as a mother of, of two queer
children actually, um, uh, one transgender
child, um, um, and one pansexual child.
The, the statistics of that, if
it was just, it just happens to,
it just happens to some people.
The statistics of, of that in my
mind, it shows that this is something
that is being taught to kids.
This is something that
is being told to kids.
This is something that is being
encouraged, that something happens.
An event happens.
Your, your little boy puts on mom's
high heels one day and it's oh, He's
actually a girl born in the wrong body.
A little girl plays with trucks one day.
And next thing you know, you're
calling Susie Bobby it's.
It is something that is being pushed.
Onto kids and Disney wants
to push it onto your kids.
She continues.
Um, and, and also as a leader.
Um, and that was the thing that really
got me because I have heard so much
from so many of my colleagues over
the course of the last couple weeks,
um, and open forums and through
emails and phone conversations.
And.
um, I feel a responsibility to
speak, um, not just for myself,
but for them, uh, to all of us.
We, we had a, we had an open forum
last week at 20th, where, um, again,
the home of, of really incredible
groundbreaking, G Q I a stories over the
years where, um, one of our execs stood
up and said, you know, we only have a
handful of queer leads in our content.
And I went.
That can't be true.
And I, and I, and I realized,
oh, it, it actually is true.
We have many, many, many QIA
characters in our stories and, and,
and yet we don't have enough leads.
Um, and here, here is a confession
already that in their past content
they've been explicit and intentional
to put indoct indoctrinating.
Propaganda into their content
of L G B Q I element P plus
characters into their shows.
And here she's saying, you know what?
I realize we need to push the
envelope on this a little bit more.
And that's what they
did with buzz light ear.
There's about, uh, 45 seconds left from
this clip in which gay characters just,
just get to be characters, um, and,
and not have to be about gay stories.
And so, um, that's been
very eye opening for me.
Um, and, and I, I can tell you, um,
it's something that I feel perhaps
had this moment not happened.
Um, I, as a leader and me as my
colleagues would not have focused on
and, and going forward, um, I certainly
will be more so I know that we will be.
And, um, and I hope this is a
moment where she, um, the 50%
of the tears, sorry are coming.
Um, uh, we don't, we just don't
allow each other to go backwards.
We don't allow each other to go backwards.
We, we have come to a moment as this
exec says, we have come to a moment where
we realize we need to be doing more.
We need to be pushing the envelope more.
And what is the result?
The result is buzz light year buzz
light year now having overt messaging,
not it's not even messaging,
just overt signaling to children.
It is one thing for you as, uh,
a producer to create shows for
your adult audiences that promote.
Your your, your LGBTQ agenda.
You can, you can do that
content for your adults.
That's fine.
But it's, it's something else when
you are actively seeking to promote
degenerate behavior, and it is
degenerate behavior among children, it is
to promote unhealthy patterns
that are they're against.
Biological norms for hundreds of
thousands of years, let alone let
alone the moral stances that the
majority of the world believes in
majority, but it is not enough.
Well, Dubai praise God,
Dubai strikes back.
And, uh, according to the most reputable
Instagram account, Dubai problems,
the middle east claps back with buzz
light year remake bother light year.
To infinity in Shaw law.
And it is, uh, buzz light
year in an era remake.
I'm looking forward to seeing
this film batter light year.
It's gonna be a, a best seller.
Um, I think that buzz
might be a, uh, or BA.
Might be instead of a space ranger
he's might maybe he's like a BEU
farmer who gets accepted into the UAE,
uh, Mars program and goes to Mars.
We'll we'll have to see in Shal law, this
is going to be, uh, a total blockbuster.
Can't wait for this movie and
a hundred percent guaranteed.
There's not going to be the L G B T.
Indoctrination of your kids in this film?
Well, this show is brought
to you by listeners like you.
I want to thank each and every one of
you who support this show on a monthly,
weekly basis, uh, we would not be able
to be here and do this without you.
So thank you.
If you get value out of the show,
consider giving value back to the.
And you can do so by visiting Lucas, scrub
bot.com/support, and you can give value to
the show and the value that you feel like
you get out of it, whatever dollar price
point that might be, as you can tell, we
don't have commercial breaks on the show
because this is funded and supported by.
Viewers like you, well, don't go away.
We will be right back with our
closing Weaver and loom segment.
Welcome back to Weaver and loom a
part of the show where we take ancient
wisdom and we weave it in with our
everyday lives so that we can own
our future and weave our destiny.
Well, today is a, a quote passage.
And a little bit of a story that I
think, uh, well, it's, it's been in
my mind for the last number of weeks
and I think will be challenging and
encouraging to you and the, the we'll
read the, the quote first, and then we'll
tell the backstory here's the quote.
The quote is, uh, actually a, a
scripture verse from the old Testament.
Joshua.
And it says, this is
God speaking to Joshua.
It says, have I not commanded you be
strong and courageous do not be frightened
and do not be dismayed for the Lord.
Your God is with you wherever you go.
So here's the command that Joshua is
getting from God do not be afraid.
Do not be dismayed instead,
be strong and courageous.
Now here's the backstory.
If you, if you remember back to back
in the way, back in your life, if
you were ever in Sunday school, or if
you ever watched one of those Moses
movies, you know, that the Israelites
were enslaved in Egypt, they get
out of slavery through a series of
miraculous events, 10 plagues at.
Egypt and Moses leads the Israelites
millions of them through the red sea.
And they wander around the, the
cyanide peninsula, the, uh, the,
uh, Arab peninsula for 40 years.
There's supposed to be 40 days.
Turns out to be 40 years, Moses.
At the, the end of his life,
120 years old, he dies.
He's not able to go
into the promised land.
And Joshua is one of the only
ones who was actually in Egypt.
And survived through the whole
40 years and the wilderness and
is going into the promised land.
He has a lot to be afraid of.
There are giants in the land.
There's there's wild beasts in the land.
When he goes into land,
it's not just given to him.
He has to fight.
He has to fight against
fortified cities and giants.
People who are trained in war who have
fortified, uh, barracks and barricades.
And fortres.
It's a, it's a rough task.
It's a tall task.
He's trying to lead to people
who don't really want to be led.
He has a lot of problems, leading millions
of people who don't wanna be led, who
are stiff necked, and he has to lead them
all wandering sojourners into war, into
war with no real reserves to pull on.
There is every reason
for him to be frighten.
For him to be dismayed for him
to be worried to him, to be
discouraged for him to wonder,
what am I even doing with my life?
Is this I should just, I should just
go take my goat somewhere and find a
little Oasis and, uh, enjoy my life.
What, what am I even doing?
Why am I even, why am I doing this?
I shouldn't be leading
these people in no way.
They're crazy.
It's not worth the headache, not worth
the headache, but he gets a command.
And that command is be strong
and courageous do not be
frightened, do not be dismayed.
I, however, I can often find myself
dismayed, I can find myself in worry.
I can find myself discouraged, but
if I, but if I'm discouraged, that
means I'm actually in disobedience.
Find discourage.
That means I'm actually not living the
reality that I ought to live if I'm not
in gratitude in Thanksgiving and in hope.
And in belief that I am missing out
on, on the real reality that I'm called
to live to often in, we, we like to
embrace our emotions of discourage.
We like to feel those feelings of when
we feel discouraged, I wanna scroll
into bed, feel discouraged and, and,
and feel the sense of doom that things
are not going to work out my way.
But in reality, that that really is
missing the mark that is falling short
of the experience that we ought to live.
If you, if you believe.
In, in the fact that
you were created by God.
But if you are, if you're a Darwinist,
you don't believe in, in God, you
don't believe that that whole thing
exists then of course, just adopt
ans and AISM and, uh, live in dismay
and discouragement and despair.
That you're welcome to.
But for those of us who believe in a,
in a monotheistic God, we are command.
It is, it is a command to rejoice.
Always.
It is a command to be thankful.
Always it is a command to not be.
Because if we are discouraged,
it means that we are putting our
trust in our belief in bad news.
We're putting our trust and belief
in what we can see with our eyes.
Rather what we can see with our heart,
rather with the promises that we
know stand true for both you and I.
And when we believe in the promises,
when we believe in what is in
what is to come is for our good.
And that we will not be abandoned.
That gives us courage and strength
to press forward and not shrink back.
And it is that courage that
is needed in this day and age.
When we look at the stock markets,
we look at inflation, we look at the,
the, the propagating of, of ideologies,
which are at its core, targeting
our children and are, are against.
Are are destructive.
I mean, you look at, you look at the,
the number of, uh, of suicide amongst
transgender kids it's through the roof.
And yet that is being pushed.
That is being pushed on children.
So there's a lot to be discouraged about.
There's a lot to be dismayed about.
However, you could be someone and
I strive to be someone I'm not
always that person, but I strive
to be someone who takes courage.
Who does not give into despair and
believes that maybe I won't see it
today, but we're building something.
We're building something that generation
from now or generations from now will
have a blessing, will have a blessing on
thousands and thousands of people's lives.
And I believe that for your life as well.
Well, thank you for listening to the show.
If you have any questions, please?
What's at Mia plus 1, 2 0 2 9 2 2 0 2 2 0.
Or, and I will answer them right here
on the show, just as we took a huge
segment to respond to illicit mind
today and his, uh, his antinatalism,
um, ideas of how, you know, what
really people who have babies, they
really should be criminally charged.
Uh, that is all go out this
week, go out this week.
Be filled with hope and faith in
spite of what you see the stock market
doing in spite of what you see Disney
doing in spite, what you might fear,
don't give into fear instead, be
courageous and go and own your future.