Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Mastering Cybersecurity is your narrated audio guide to the essential building blocks of digital protection. Each 10–15 minute episode turns complex security concepts into clear, practical lessons you can apply right away—no jargon, no fluff. From passwords and phishing to encryption and network defense, every topic is designed to strengthen your understanding and confidence online. Whether you’re new to cybersecurity or refreshing your knowledge, this series makes learning simple, smart, and surprisingly engaging. And want more? Check out the book at BareMetalCyber.com!
Welcome to our exploration of why you cannot secure what you cannot see in cybersecurity. This episode focuses on asset inventory, the simple idea of knowing exactly what technology you depend on every day. Before anything else, you need to understand what security professionals mean when they say the word assets. In security, assets are anything valuable that supports how a business works, including laptops, servers, cloud accounts, and important data. When those assets are visible and counted, it becomes much easier to protect them in a deliberate way. When they are invisible or forgotten, they turn into quiet openings that attackers can discover before defenders even know something exists. Beginners often jump straight into tools, alerts, or headlines without first building this basic map of their environment. Without that map, every later security effort rests on a shaky foundation that can surprise people. In this episode, you will learn how different kinds of assets fit together as one picture. You will also see why even small gaps in that picture can make logging, patching, and incident response much less effective.
An asset inventory is simply a living list that describes the technology a group depends on, kept reasonably up to date. Instead of being a dusty document, it should feel like a current map that reflects what people actually use to do their work. Each entry on that map describes a specific thing, such as a laptop, website, application, or storage location, using enough detail that someone can find it again later. The inventory might live in a spreadsheet, a simple internal tool, or a larger asset platform for bigger organizations. Whatever form it takes, its purpose is always the same, which is helping people see what really exists before they make security decisions. When you want to add logging, you start by checking which assets can generate events. When you want to improve backups, you start by checking which assets hold important data. When you want to roll out a new security control, you start by checking which assets must receive it and in what order. Over time, this living inventory becomes a backbone that connects different security activities, so people stop guessing about where to focus effort. Without that backbone, even very smart teams end up reacting to surprises because they never saw the full picture.
Hardware assets are usually the easiest for beginners to imagine, because they include everyday devices like laptops, desktops, and phones. These are the tools people carry into meetings, bring home at night, and sometimes lose in taxis or coffee shops without telling anyone right away. In a simple asset inventory, you might track each device with a name, an owner, a location, and perhaps a basic purpose statement. That small amount of structure makes it easier to answer questions later, such as whose laptop was affected when a specific phishing campaign successfully delivered malware. Hardware also covers shared gear like office printers, conference room equipment, and networking boxes that sit quietly in closets. Even when these devices seem boring, attackers may treat them as stepping stones that help them move deeper into more sensitive systems. When a team forgets to track old laptops or shared devices, those items often miss basic updates and security checks. Over time, the list of unseen hardware grows, and each forgotten device acts like another unlocked side door. A clear hardware section in the asset inventory shrinks those side doors, making it easier to see which physical tools truly exist and who is responsible for them.
Server assets and virtual machines sit behind the scenes and quietly power many everyday services, such as websites, file shares, and internal applications. Unlike a single laptop, a server might support hundreds of people at once, which makes its failure or compromise especially painful. Virtual machines are software based servers that run on top of physical hosts, allowing many separate environments to share the same hardware while staying logically divided. For asset inventory purposes, it helps to treat each server or virtual machine as its own entry with a clear role, such as web server, database server, or application server. A small college bookstore website, for example, might use one server for the website and a second server for payment processing, each with different protections and logging needs. When organizations do not track these servers carefully, they sometimes leave old virtual machines running after projects end, quietly consuming resources and increasing risk. Attackers love these forgotten systems because no one is watching them closely, and alerts from them may be ignored. A good inventory makes it easier to see which servers exist, which business functions they support, and which team cares about them. With that visibility, teams can prioritize protections for the most critical services instead of guessing based on incomplete memories.
Cloud resources bring another important category into the asset inventory, because many organizations now rely on infrastructure they do not physically own. Instead of buying their own servers, they rent computing power, storage, and databases from large providers that run massive data centers around the world. Each cloud account, virtual network, storage bucket, and managed database is still an asset that needs to be visible, even if no one can touch the underlying metal. For beginners, it helps to picture the cloud as someone else’s computer that your organization configures remotely, with permissions and settings that can be changed from a browser. If a team forgets to include these cloud assets in their inventory, they may miss important security settings, such as public exposure or weak access controls. A small clinic might move its appointment scheduling system into the cloud, for example, and then forget that certain test environments still contain real patient data. Without a clear inventory entry, no one remembers to check how those cloud systems log activity, or how frequently their software is updated. Over time, cloud usage tends to sprawl as more teams experiment with new services, which makes early tracking even more important. A strong asset inventory keeps that sprawl understandable by tying every cloud resource back to an owner and a purpose.
Software as a Service (S A A S) applications are another class of assets that easily slip out of sight, because anyone with a credit card and a browser can start using them. These tools live entirely on the provider’s side, and people interact with them through websites or mobile apps instead of installing traditional programs on local machines. Common examples include file sharing platforms, task management boards, customer relationship systems, and communication tools that teams adopt to move faster. From a security perspective, each S A A S application holds data, has user accounts, and interacts with other systems through integrations or imported files. If those applications are not captured in the asset inventory, no one may know where sensitive information is actually stored or who has access. A marketing team might start using a new email service to manage campaigns, for instance, and quietly upload large contact lists pulled from other systems. Without an inventory entry, security teams might never review how that service handles authentication, logging, and data deletion. Over time, dozens of S A A S tools can appear across different departments, each creating its own island of data and risk. A thoughtful asset inventory pulls these islands into view, so their use can be managed rather than discovered only during incidents.
Accounts and identities form a less visible kind of asset, because they represent people and services rather than physical devices. Each user account combines a username, authentication method, and a set of permissions that determine what the person can see or change. Service accounts work similarly but are used by applications or scripts to communicate with systems without direct human action. In a modern environment, there can be thousands of these identities scattered across email platforms, directory services, cloud consoles, and business applications. An asset inventory that includes identities helps teams understand which accounts exist, who owns them, and which systems they can reach. Without that view, old contractor accounts may linger long after someone leaves, still holding powerful permissions that nobody remembers. Forgotten service accounts can be even more dangerous, because they often bypass typical login prompts and hold access keys stored in configuration files. Attackers who compromise one of these neglected identities can move quietly across many systems while appearing as legitimate activity. By treating identities as first class assets in the inventory, organizations gain a clearer picture of who and what can act inside their environment.
Data stores are another crucial category of assets, because they hold the actual information attackers usually want to steal or alter. A data store can be a database server, a shared file system, a set of cloud storage buckets, or even a collaboration site where documents accumulate over time. What matters is that important records, such as customer details, health information, or financial transactions, are concentrated there rather than spread evenly across every machine. In an asset inventory, describing data stores includes noting what type of information they contain, which systems feed them, and which people or applications can access them. A community fundraiser might store donor lists in a cloud spreadsheet, while a small clinic keeps appointment histories in a dedicated database. If those locations never appear in the inventory, security teams cannot prioritize protections like encryption, backup testing, or stricter access controls. They also struggle to answer basic questions after an incident, such as which data stores might have been affected by a particular compromised account. When data stores are clearly listed as assets, it becomes easier to align security measures with the value and sensitivity of the underlying information.
Logging is the practice of recording important events that happen on systems, such as logins, configuration changes, and error messages. These records, often called logs, help security teams see patterns, trace activity, and notice behavior that does not match normal expectations. For logging to be useful, however, teams must know which assets can generate logs, where those logs are stored, and how consistently they are collected. An incomplete asset inventory makes this difficult, because some systems never make it onto the list, so nobody asks whether they should send logs anywhere. A forgotten test server, for example, might accept connections from the internet without ever recording who connected or what they did. When an attacker uses that server as a foothold, there may be no trail to follow, even if other parts of the environment log faithfully. Centralized log analysis tools can only work with information they actually receive, not with invisible systems nobody listed. By linking every asset entry to its logging status, organizations dramatically reduce these blind spots and create more reliable visibility into their environment.
Patching is the process of updating software to fix known flaws, called vulnerabilities, that attackers might exploit to gain unauthorized access. Operating system vendors and application developers regularly release patches to close these weaknesses, but those fixes only help when they reach every relevant asset. An accurate inventory shows which machines run which software versions, so teams can plan patch rollouts in a targeted, organized way. Without that view, some servers, laptops, or cloud instances quietly miss updates, staying vulnerable long after others have been secured. A small company might proudly announce that it patched its main file server, while forgetting an older file server that still holds archived documents. Attackers who find that neglected system can exploit an old vulnerability and then move deeper into the environment, bypassing newer defenses. Security scanning tools can help discover missing patches, yet they still rely on knowing where to look and which assets exist. When the asset inventory and patching process are linked, teams can track coverage, flag exceptions, and reduce long term exposure from forgotten systems.
Incident response is the organized way an organization reacts when something goes wrong in security, such as a breach, ransomware infection, or suspicious activity. Responders need to know which systems exist, what they do, and who uses them, so they can quickly decide where to focus containment and investigation. An accurate asset inventory gives them a starting map, saving precious minutes during stressful situations when every decision matters. Without that map, responders may spend time hunting down basic facts, such as whether a particular server is still in production or which department relies on it. If an alert mentions a hostname that nobody recognizes, the team might lose time calling around, searching documentation, or trying to guess its importance from incomplete hints. In contrast, an inventory entry can list the owner, business function, and data sensitivity for that asset, providing context instantly. That context shapes decisions about whether to disconnect a system, notify leaders, or involve external partners. When incident response planning assumes a reliable asset inventory, the entire process becomes more repeatable, less chaotic, and easier to improve after each event.
Shadow technology often appears outside normal Information Technology (I T) channels, and people commonly call this pattern shadow I T. Employees often turn to these unofficial tools because they want to solve problems quickly, collaborate more easily, or bypass slow internal procedures. Examples include signing up for a new file sharing site, creating an unmanaged team chat space, or building a simple web form on a public platform. Each of these tools becomes an asset that holds data, receives connections, and sometimes integrates with other systems, yet nobody in security may know it exists. When shadow I T assets are missing from the inventory, they are unlikely to receive consistent logging, patching, or backup coverage. They may also fall outside normal training and monitoring, which increases the chance that risky settings or weak passwords go unnoticed. Shadow I T can appear in any department, from marketing to finance to small project teams running pilots. By including questions about unofficial tools in surveys, interviews, and onboarding, teams can gradually discover these hidden assets and bring them into the formal inventory. Once they are visible, organizations can decide whether to support, replace, or retire them with clear information rather than guesswork.
Forgotten test and lab systems create another category of hidden assets that attackers often exploit, because these environments are typically built quickly and then neglected after projects end. Developers or administrators might spin up a temporary server to test a new feature, restore a copy of production data for troubleshooting, or experiment with configuration changes in a safe space. When deadlines pass, those systems sometimes remain running with weaker passwords, extra debugging tools, or open access that would never be allowed in production. If nobody records them in the asset inventory, they may never receive regular patches, logging configuration, or backup checks. A small retailer might keep an old test copy of its e commerce site on a public server, still containing realistic customer data from earlier imports. Attackers scanning the internet can discover that server, exploit its weaker protections, and gain insight into the rest of the environment. Over time, these abandoned labs accumulate like digital junkyards, making it difficult for teams to know which systems are still important. By insisting that every test environment and lab server receives at least a basic inventory entry, organizations reduce the number of surprise systems that appear during incidents.
Getting started with asset inventory does not require fancy tools or a large budget, especially in smaller environments. A simple spreadsheet or shared document can hold the first version, listing each asset with a name, type, owner, and basic purpose. You might begin with only a single department, a small clinic, or a community fundraiser, writing down laptops, key servers, important S A A S applications, and obvious data stores. Over time, you can add columns for logging status, patch coverage, and sensitivity, turning the list into a more powerful planning aid. The most important step is making asset inventory a regular habit rather than a one time project that quickly becomes outdated and forgotten. Short, scheduled reviews help teams add new systems, retire old entries, and correct mistakes before they cause confusion during stressful events. As the inventory matures, it becomes easier to explain your environment to auditors, partners, and new team members in clear, grounded terms. More importantly, you gain the confidence that comes from knowing what you actually depend on before you design defenses. This has been the Mastering Cybersecurity podcast, developed by Bare Metal Cyber dot com, sharing practical guidance to help you build safer environments.