Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
This podcast provides you the ability to listen to new regulatory guidance issued by the National Credit Union Administration, and occasionally the F D I C, the O C C, the F F I E C, or the C F P B. We will focus on new and material agency guidance, and historically important and still active guidance from past years that NCUA cites in examinations or conversations. This podcast is educational only and is not legal advice. We are sponsored by Credit Union Exam Solutions Incorporated. We also have another podcast called With Flying Colors where we provide tips for achieving success with the N C U A examination process and discuss hot topics that impact your credit union.
Hello, this is Samantha Shares. This episode covers N C U A’s letter to credit unions number Eighty six dash C U dash eighty four on Insider Dealing and Conflicts of Interest
The following is an audio version of that advisory and the press release. This podcast is educational and is not legal advice. We are sponsored by Credit Union Exam Solutions Incorporated, whose team has over two hundred and Forty years of National Credit Union Administration experience. We assist our clients with N C U A so they save time and money. If you are worried about a recent, upcoming or in process N C U A examination, reach out to learn how they can assist at Mark Treichel DOT COM. Our founder Mark Treichel started his career in nineteen eighty six, the year he began at the agency and it is also the only letter to credit unions from that year that is still active. Also check out our other podcast called With Flying Colors where we provide tips on how to achieve success with N C U A.
And now the letter.
Insider Dealing and Conflicts of Interest
To
Board of Directors of the Federally-Insured Credit Unions Addressed
Subject
Governance
Status
Active
Much has been said recently within the credit union movement about an unpleasant subject for credit unions - insider dealing and conflicts of interest. We are addressing this subject now for two reasons: first, to set the record straight on the nature of this problem; and second, to tell you what NCUA is doing about it.
NCUA recently completed a comprehensive report, including case reviews of insider dealing and conflicts of interest in federally-insured credit unions over the last two years, and of the laws, rules and procedures in place to prevent these cases and to resolve them when they do occur.
The first thing you should know is that the number of such cases, as a percentage of the 15,000 federally insured credit unions in the United States, is very small. Thus, the existence of a limited number of cases does not impart a bad name to the credit union movement, or to the vast majority of honest, hard-working volunteers and employees in credit unions.
It is true, however, that a limited number of cases have resulted in millions of dollars in financial costs to your insurance fund. A review of ten of the major cases over the last two years, for example, indicates potential aggregate costs to the Insurance Fund from these cases alone in the range of fifty to seventy five million dollar. The problems include the following: embezzlement, preferential and substandard loans to officials and employees, substandard commercial loans to management officials and their business interests, refinancing of nonperforming loans to cover up past-due principal and interest, conversion of credit unions' assets (businesses, and real and personal property) to personal use and benefit, ownership by management officials of fixed assets that are leased by the credit union on less than arms-length terms, and receipt by credit union officials and employees of commission and fee income in connection with the business transactions of the credit union and its members.
Obviously, these practices have no place in the credit union movement, and it is incumbent upon the National Credit Union Administration to consider every reasonable means of prevention. Remember, every dollar in financial costs to the Insurance Fund reduces by one dollar the amount available to pay dividends on your deposit in the Fund.
In our review of these cases, we determined that virtually every problem we encountered was a violation of a law or regulation already on the books, ranging from provisions of the U.S. Criminal Code to the rules of N C U A and the State Supervisors, to the Common Law doctrine of fiduciary responsibility. We concluded, therefore, that the solution does not lie in promulgating new restrictions, but rather in improving our efforts at education, investigation and enforcement.
In that connection, we are taking a number of positive steps at agency that we want you to be aware of:
• We have adopted new criminal referral forms and procedures that will improve the ability of the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute criminal activity in federally-insured credit unions. We are reinstituting an examiner workpaper on "insider transactions" that will improve our ability to detect conflicts of interest.
• We have recently hired one litigation specialist and authorized hiring another to deal primarily with enforcement actions and recovering claims in problem-case credit unions.
• We are working with the National Association of State Credit Union Supervisors (NASCUS) to develop a so-called "model exam" - a core set of examination forms and procedures to be used by the agency and the state regulators.
• We have reached agreement with NASCUS on the circumstances under which N C U A will participate in the examination of problem-case state credit unions. (We believe that N C U A, the state regulators and all credit unions are bound to benefit from improved coordination of examinations.)
• We are reviewing N C U A's statutory enforcement powers (cease and desist, prohibition, removal, etc.) and may develop proposed legislation enhancing our ability to use those powers.
• Finally, we are developing a chapter for inclusion in a forthcoming officials' handbook providing comprehensive guidelines on the subjects of conflict of interest and the responsibilities of credit union officials and employees.
In the interim, this letter should remind everyone of the responsibility we all bear in maintaining the integrity and the reputation of the credit union movement.
In closing, we would suggest, as a basic rule of thumb, that all officials and employees of federally-insured credit unions avoid situations where they would derive personal gain from the business of the credit union, other than normal salary, benefits and permissible, nonpreferential loans. Finally, all officials and employees should be mindful of their responsibility to report all suspected criminal activities to the N C U A Regional Office. If you have questions about a particular situation, do not hesitate to call upon your Regional Office or State Supervisor, as the case may be.
Sincerely,
ROGER W. JEPSEN
Then Chairman
National credit Union Administration Board
This concludes the NCUA Letter on Insider Dealing and Conflicts of Interest If your Credit union could use assistance with your exam, reach out to Mark Treichel on LinkedIn, or at mark Treichel dot com. This is Samantha Shares and we Thank you for listening.