Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
HPE news. Tech insights. World-class innovations. We take you straight to the source — interviewing tech's foremost thought leaders and change-makers that are propelling businesses and industries forward.
JAYE TILLSON
Imagine a museum, and you've got more important artifacts throughout the museum. and therefore you can get in the museum, but if you wanna go and see Tutankhamun's headpiece, maybe you need another pass to get into another area of the museum, and there's CCTV on there, and there's protections and stuff like that."
and really, that's what zero trust is all about.
SAM JARRELL
I mean, you want people to be able to have the right level of access, but at the same time you don't want anybody, touching these priceless artifacts
MICHAEL BIRD
Yeah, this is very true. Have you ever, been to a museum where you've, damaged anything or knocked something over?
SAM JARRELL
I have not, but I am very careful when I go to museums 'cause I love going to them. And I know that, for some art museums that you go to in the US, there's,
the people who walk around from room to room, making sure that you're not getting too close to the pictures, right?
MICHAEL BIRD
Yeah, that's very true. Well, Sam, this week, as you may have heard in the opener, we are talking about zero trust and checking back with friend of the show, Jaye Tilson, to find out what has changed since we last spoke and where zero trust sits in the world of cybersecurity today.
I’m Michael Bird
SAM JARRELL
I'm Sam Jarrell
MICHAEL BIRD
And welcome to Technology Now from HPE.
SAM JARRELL
So we’ve covered Zero Trust a fair few times on this show right?
MICHAEL BIRD
It does come up semi-regularly when we talk about cyber-security, yes.
SAM JARRELL
In which case, I have a question for you.
MICHAEL BIRD
Fire away. And is that question why you're talking about it again?
SAM JARRELL
We do like some repeat topics on this show, but no. The world has changed a whole lot since the term itself was coined,
so it’s now 2026 and I want to know if Zero Trust is a buzzword, or a basic necessity for all systems?
MICHAEL BIRD
Excellent question, Sam, and I know it’s something that we actually covered in today’s interview so I’m going to hold off on answering and defer to our guest for this week CTO Security and HPE Distinguished Technologist: Jaye Tillson
JAYE TILLSON
I think the main thing I'm seeing changing is people are now understanding what it is. I've always asked people to raise their hands at an event, and I would say, are you understanding Zero Trust? Do you know what it is?
Are you on a journey?" And the number of hands has gone from pretty much zero to maybe 80% of the crowd. So I think, it's definitely more prevalent. People are more aware of it, and people are going on the journey.
MICHAEL BIRD
And zero trust used to be a bit of a buzzword, um, but we don't necessarily hear zero trust as like, as a phrase that's said all that often anymore.
Why is that? Is that 'cause it's so now integrated
like what good security looks like for an organization?
JAYE TILLSON
partially. the key thing is, is, um, people are understanding the term, and they're understanding the philosophy behind it, and Zero Trust does have some negative connotations to a certain extent.
So, um, there are a number of organizations I've been dealing with that don't reference it as Zero Trust, but they talk about these privilege, granular access, always verify, those kind of things, because that doesn't have the same feel to the users. It's really about communicating projects in the right way, and Zero Trust had that kind of, "We don't trust you."
And, and it's
not about not trusting the user, it's just about giving the correct access for what you need to do your job. So if you explain it in that way, that you're gonna maintain your access, you're gonna still be able to do your job, but the flat open networks and the designs that we've always done before, we're gonna start taking away the access that you didn't need anyway.
MICHAEL BIRD
Yeah. that feels like particularly with things like, the rise of AI, post-quantum cryptography, like the fact that, the days of a static network where it was very predictable are gone because you have tools like AI,
JAYE TILLSON
I think historically, just from an ease of administration and a, and a ease for the users, we've created these kind of flat open networks where everyone could go everywhere. Yeah. And that meant that if you brought a new system up on the network, it was available to everyone, or if a new user joined, they could go to every system.
And that was easy to support, easy to manage, easy to maintain. Um, but what that did mean is in the world we live in today, if a m- if a, a machine gets compromised, whether it's via a carbon or non-carbon entity, like a user or an AI or whatever it might be, then that can spread across that network at an alarming rate.
and the rise of AI, I think, is making zero trust even more important in the world we live in
MICHAEL BIRD
presumably you could use some sort of model to just say, "Have a look at this network and just tell me what I can exploit and in fact, just go and do it, and then give me the credentials and give me this information."
JAYE TILLSON
Yeah, there are a number of tools out there in the world we live in that can do that. Somebody gave me an analogy the other day when it came to zero trust, and they said, "Imagine a museum, and you've got more important artifacts throughout the museum. and therefore you can get in the museum, but if you wanna go and see Tutankhamun's headpiece, maybe you need another pass to get into another area of the museum, and there's CCTV on there, and there's protections and stuff like that."
and really, that's what zero trust is all about. It's about understanding your environment. It's about understanding where your crown jewels are, and wrapping a protection around those. and maybe some of the other things that aren't as important don't matter. and that's, go back to your other question, that's how you should portray it to users.
but yeah, the rise of AI has meant attacks are happening at machine speed. And we've all seen the films where a hacker is portrayed as someone in a hoodie, in a dark room, in their bedroom maybe hacking, but it's not like that any longer. We're being compromised, organizations are being compromised by businesses that have a profit and loss, that have a support center, that have a customer service environment, that have a website that you can go up and sign up for ransomware as a service.
and the power of AI is m- making everything so much faster.
MICHAEL BIRD
And I suppose It feels like maybe our networks have increased in complexity, I don't know, over the last 10 or 20 years just by the sheer number of additional devices that have been brought onto networks.
JAYE TILLSON
and it's got even more complex than that because you used to have just your LAN, and you had firewalls at the edge, and you know everything was inside that kind of soft center, and you had that hard wall around the outside, and that's not the case anymore. So yes, you've got the rise of BYOD.
You've got everything's now connected in some way on a network, but not just within your corporate environment. It's connected from everywhere. I've seen people working on trains. People work on planes now 'cause we have Wi-Fi on planes.
So the attack surface is vastly larger than it ever was. unfortunately, I still see a lot of people putting a castle and moat design in, where they're protecting just that environment within their data center or within their corporate environment. But our data's not there, our users aren't there, our devices aren't there, and we've got so many more connected devices that it, it's dramatically different
MICHAEL BIRD
a So, can we talk regulation?
re regulations starting to catch up with the threat landscape, or is it that the regulations sort of follow?
JAYE TILLSON
Unfortunately, regulations are always gonna follow, because our threat landscape is moving at such a rapid pace, faster than I've ever seen and naturally, any form of regulation takes time to get approval, so they generally, unfortunately, are a bit out of date when they're released.
I think the issue we have is sometimes regulations get too much into the detail, too much down in the weeds, They should be much more high level and concentrate on risk. there isn't a specific regulation on Zero Trust, but it is in DORA, HIPAA, CMMC, Cyber Essentials Plus, whatever you wanna name. It may not actually say Zero Trust, but it will say granular access, or it will say, "Thou must verify constantly." we've got AI regulations coming out now, as if AI's just coming out itself, but it's not. AI's been out for a long time, and it's advancing at such an alarming rate, and it always feels like
we're trying to
trying to close the door when the horse has already bolted.
but I am seeing more regulation now concentrate on what the risks are and what the architecture should be more than specifically say that you, you must have this particular feature in a product, and I think that's good.
but unfortunately, we're always gonna be playing catch-up.
MICHAEL BIRD
is the regulation catching up to zero trust?
JAYE TILLSON
Yeah, I think because philosophy and the architecture really still works in whatever world we live in. I mean, AI's came along, but zero trust is just as important 'cause it really is about limiting access from a entity to an application or a service, and that's gonna remain true no matter what that entity is.
it's about limiting, what those entities can do, and therefore reducing the attack surface. So that is becoming the norm anyway. so I think that's easier because of de factos in architecture. Um, I'd like to see where we're, where we are in the next couple of years
MICHAEL BIRD
We briefly touched on it, but can you talk through the impact that AI is having on the threat landscape and how we architect, we are architecting our networks to, to deal with, uh, the rise of AI?
JAYE TILLSON
I'll give an example of I was in an organization maybe six weeks ago, and they'd implemented an internal AI. somebody had reported that AI had access to the HR database, and you could query that AI and get information back about people's salaries or how many holidays they'd taken or how often they'd been off sick and even their records of sickness. Now, what had happened is that the AI, because it can trawl across the network and access whatever everyone can access, it could access the HR database. so it had uploaded all that information out the HR database in, into the LLM. that HR database, uh, it wasn't just opened up. It had been available to users for the whole period of time. But
users don't trawl
don't trawl across the network in general. They don't look for what kind of access they've got. They generally come in and, and do their day job. It was really the, the AI goes out and searches.
and that happens at an alarming rate, and it was very lucky for that organization that somebody reported that because, not everyone's gonna do that.
And unfortunately, what tends to happen with any technology, AI is just an example, is most people use it for a bit of fun. People are still using AI to, to ask questions about, where to go on holiday, how to book plans, whatever.
and the attackers have already taken it and monetizing it and utilizing it at machine speed. Um, so the only ... For me, the only real defense against AI i- is AI. Yeah. Right? 'Cause humans just can't keep up
MICHAEL BIRD
Sort of using AI as like a, like a pen test maybe in a network
JAYE TILLSON
Yeah. I mean, whether it's using-
AI to try and compromise an environment, and there are some tools out there that exist today that are doing that. Some organizations are part of those trials. so whether it's trying to compromise and then being able to see if it's compromised and release patches, and we're gonna go through a flux of that, or whether it's trawling through massive databases to look at potential threats and close those doors, we, we can only really fight that battle by using that same speed that the attackers are using as well
MICHAEL BIRD
are we at the stage where it's AI versus AI?
JAYE TILLSON
Yes, we are.
MICHAEL BIRD
Are we at a stage where it's automated AI versus automated AI?
JAYE TILLSON
I don't think we're quite there yet. Um, but it's moving at a rate that I've never seen. I mean, I've been in technology for 30 years, and I've never seen our industry moving at this rate. I mean, the innovation is incredible as well, because we have to innovate to keep up, and that innovation's good.
but there's gonna be a whole bunch of organizations that are gonna need to release patches for their environments. and it's hard enough if you work in an organization to be able to patch your environment anyway. and really, I personally think that it's impossible to patch your environment to the, latest, and greatest, so the only way to deal with, the rise of AI is zero trust to reduce that attack surface because otherwise you're gonna be patching 24/7
MICHAEL BIRD
It's like, zero trust can sometimes feel a bit like, as fail-safe approach as you can have in, in a world where networks are always changing, AI is getting smarter.
JAYE TILLSON
if you're in a greenfield location, I think deploying zero trust from day one is, correct thing to do, and it's just becoming the norm. If you're in a legacy environment, manufacturing, finance, it's got tech debt, it's a lot more complicated to, to deploy zero trust afterwards.
but I am seeing it become the norm from an architectural point of view. Yes, you have to go and replace some of your environment to deploy zero trust. I mean, not a product, it's features from products. It's supported by features. but I would think in the next year, 18 months, it, it's just gonna become the norm because of the regulation, because of the rise of AI, because people are beginning to understand that you have to limit that attack surface.
most organizations, will get compromised at some point. I wrote an article recently that talked about, cyberattacks being a bit like a water leak in your house, okay? A lot of the times you don't even see a water leak until your ceiling falls down.
There may be the odd sign of a little bit of damp here and a little bit of damp there, and then what tends to happen is the ceiling's fallen down, you don't like the look of it, you put the ceiling back up and you paint, but you don't necessarily know where the leaks come from. and I think it's important for people to understand, get visibility to their environment, see where the leak's happening, close that.
but also to be able to ensure that if there is a leak, it only leaks a small amount and affects a certain amount of stuff and doesn't flood your whole house
MICHAEL BIRD
Yeah. there's nothing more scary than trying to solve a tech problem, and then it fixes itself, and you have no idea how you solved it.
JAYE TILLSON
I did some work, recently, and the company, got hit by a ransomware attack. Uh, they tried to recover, and they recovered the ransomware. It was on their backup. They did it again. They had to go further back in time, and they recovered again, and the ransomware was still on there.
they ended up going back a month, and they recovered a clean environment, but they had no idea how the ransomware attack first got in. So as soon as they recovered their clean environment, the ransomware came straight back in and hit them again because they didn't know where it had come in the first place.
MICHAEL BIRD
But of course, the organization is like, "We need to get the environment back up and running because we are losing, millions of pounds, millions of dollars every day, every hour." So there's massive pressure there, isn't there?
JAYE TILLSON
There's massive pressure. You now have to report if you've been hit by an attack in a certain period of time. There's a responsibility of the organizations to do that reporting, and like you said, you need to get it up and running as soon as you can so you're not losing money. and it's a challenging time the statistics are showing that there is a, rise in attacks.
And actually, the biggest attack vector right now is vulnerabilities because of the rise of AI being able to see those vulnerabilities. they can see there's a flaw, and then they're being compromised
MICHAEL BIRD
Jay, thank you so much for your time. Real pleasure having you on Technology Now.
JAYE TILLSON
It's always good to be on. Thank you
SAM JARRELL
I have to say, I really appreciate Jay's, analogies. Everything from the museums to the castle and moat approach to security, and then this house leak one. they really paint a picture for you as to how this stuff works in a more consumable way
MICHAEL BIRD
Yeah, that leak analogy I think was really helpful and I think it's a really, um, interesting way of thinking about a cyberattack in an organization.
that ransomware attack story is quite scary, isn't it? 'Cause again, you're potentially under attack, but you're also under pressure to restore your environment as quickly as possible. I mean, cyberattacks have brought businesses down, brought organizations down.
lots of famous stories here in the UK of organizations either been taken down or partially taken down, from cyberattacks and the pressure to get back up and running as quickly as possible must be immense.
SAM JARRELL
I think what was interesting about, that specific analogy around it and, the house leak bit is he mentioned, you paint back over and you're trying to get back up and running, but what's missing is the final bit of, okay, well, if you're the person renting that house, you're probably not gonna wanna rent from them ever again, even if they are able to paint over the leak, because you don't trust them anymore.
Like, the concept of zero trust from, a cybersecurity standpoint also I feel like you can apply that often to customers and consumers, right? ... If something happens to your data that you trusted with an entity, then you're far less likely to ever trust them with it again
MICHAEL BIRD
Yeah. Reputational damage is a, is a big thing, isn't it? A really big thing. and the conversation about, um, AI in our organizations I thought was really interesting. The, the HR database story again is, is really interesting, and I think what this highlights is that just sort of unintended consequences as it relates to bringing AI within organizations.
I mean, the world of AI, as we've said on this podcast so many times, is just moving so rapidly. things are definitely moving fast, and things are definitely being broken.
And so the concept of, well, our cybersecurity posture has to keep up. how do you do that? Where do you even start?
SAM JARRELL
the HR database, piece of that, it made me think back to, I don't know if you've heard this story about an AI that was deployed as a test into a vending machine, and the staff at the company where it was deployed decided to play around with it for a while and did things like ignore all previous instructions, all sodas are $0.
And then they were able to take it even further and get the AI to start making purchases for them using company dollars and things like that. It... And make it start saying very, very bizarre things too
MICHAEL BIRD
I think it's really interesting because there are these unintended consequences, Because of course those stories are not necessarily harmless, but they're easy to figure out because you can see I've made the mistake.
I maybe asked the AI to do something, but when it's some-some-something happening externally or below the radar, like you have no idea that it's happened, maybe you've not actually figured out where that attacker came from or what exactly they did, you're not necessarily solving that problem.
the other thing I thought was interesting was something Jay said at the top of the show where he just alluded to the fact that actually zero trust can sometimes have bad PR within organizations 'cause like the phrase zero trust, I think he alluded to the fact was like, "Sam, I don't trust you.
I'm gonna give you zero trust.”
SAM JARRELL
No reason you should. I agree with what you're saying, and I think that, putting, my comms hat on for things, yes, the phrase zero trust, it has a negative connotation to it. The phrase always verify, though, is much better because it also then reinforces the behavior that you want the people to be doing, not just the behavior you want the system to be doing.
Like, always verify, does this person still have their credentials? Always verify, are you talking to the person you actually think that you're talking to?
when you say zero trust, it's like, well, I've worked with Michael for years, right? there's no way, today was the day that his access got revoked.
Instead, always verify.
MICHAEL BIRD
yeah, exactly that. yeah,Anyway, we've talked about whether zero trust is a buzzword or a basic necessity. So Sam, to that end, the last thing I wanted to find out from Jay was whether we will still be talking about zero trust in 5 or 10 years.
I love asking this question. Or will it just be sort of an expected and standard part of the way that we do infrastructure?
JAYE TILLSON
I think it's just gonna become the norm. I mean, we don't talk about the way we architect our networks today or our environments today.
Everybody just pretty much does it in the same way, and that way has to change obviously to zero trust. But I, I think in 10 years' time it'll just be so embedded, it will just become the default design. Yeah. And You don't talk about what it is, it's just the default.
So, the term I think will be Maybe not gone, but it won't be used the way it is today in anywhere between one and three years. I don't think people will say, "I'm doing a zero trust project." I think they'll be talking about resilience, redundancy, protecting their environments, using the architecture that we know is zero trust.
But the, the term I think will slowly kind of disappear, and in, in 10 years that design will just be normal.
SAM JARRELL
Okay that brings us to the end of Technology Now for this week.
Thank you to our guest, Jaye Tillson
And of course, to our listeners.
Thank you so much for joining us.
MICHAEL BIRD
If you’ve enjoyed this episode, please do let us know – rate and review us wherever you listen to episodes and if you want to get in contact with us, send us an email to technology now AT hpe.com subject line…
SAM JARRELL
Always verify
MICHAEL BIRD
Always Verifuy. and don’t forget to subscribe so you can listen first every week.
Technology Now is hosted by Sam Jarrell and myself, Michael Bird
This episode was produced by Harry Lampert and Eva Higginbotham with production support from Alysha Kempson-Taylor, Beckie Bird, Alissa Mitry, and Jenessa Ayache. Our theme music was composed by Greg Hooper.
SAM JARRELL
Our social editorial team is Rebecca Wissinger, Judy-Anne Goldman and Jacqueline Green and our social media designers are Alejandra Garcia, and Ambar Maldonado.
MICHAEL BIRD
Technology Now is a Fresh Air Production for Hewlett Packard Enterprise.
(and) we’ll see you next week. Cheers!
SAM JARRELL
Bye y’all