AWM Insights Financial and Investment News

In this episode of AWM Insights, hosts Justin Dyer and Mena Hanna take you inside the world of financial fads, from the dot-com bubble to the latest meme stocks and cryptocurrencies. Together, they break down why hype-driven trends can be so tempting—and so costly—for investors seeking long-term, multi-generational wealth. Discover practical strategies to separate substance from speculation and learn a proven framework for evaluating new opportunities in today's attention economy. If you're serious about preserving and growing your family's wealth, this episode delivers the key insights to help you play the stay-wealthy game with discipline and confidence.

Connect with us

Chapter Outline
(00:00) Understanding financial fads and short-term hype
(01:41) Historical examples of investment fads
(05:34) Emotional triggers and herd mentality
(08:59) Why investment fads ultimately fail
(12:54) Framework for analyzing new investment opportunities
(16:29) Importance of ethics and diligence in investing
(17:33) Playing the stay wealthy game

What is AWM Insights Financial and Investment News?

A bite sized discussion on timely financial news and investment topics, to help you maximize your net worth and wealth for the next generation with Justin Dyer and Mena Hanna of AWM Capital.

Justin Dyer: Hey everyone.

Welcome back to another
episode of a WM Insights.

We're gonna talk fads today, really
going from hype to developing habits

to really build real wealth long,
real multi-generational wealth.

We're in this period of.

What's being thrown around
is the new attention economy.

And that's driving a lot of fads
back to the forefront, I would say.

And so we're gonna get through or go
through what's making them so tempting,

why they might work in the short term,
but generally speaking, why it's not a

repeatable, robust way to really maintain
that long-term, multi-generational wealth.

The downside usually wins out
or washes out, you could say.

So, we're gonna jump right into it.

Let's talk let's kind of define
what we're talking about.

A fad is something that is, realizes
really short term momentum driven

gains, probably something that's
not super strong and fundamentals.

It's strong in maybe a short-term
narrative and excitement in marketing

and branding, but when you just go

Beneath the surface, you are, you're often
left looking, asking more questions and

wondering what's actually going on here.

And so.

We're gonna talk about some current
and historical fads that have been

driving a lot of attention, a lot
of short-term wealth creation.

And then kind of punchline
here is a lot of loss of wealth

as, as well on the back end.

Mena Hanna: Yeah.

And we've seen so many different.

Examples, you know, starting off
with the com bubble where the Nasdaq

appreciated 800% over a five year
period of time, which is crazy.

And kind of when people started
realizing that there were no

fundamentals to back pets.com

and these multi-billion dollar
businesses that were just the

name or kind of as you alluded to,
were just there to get attention.

And not dollars.

You saw an unwinding of those
markets and a pretty big drop off.

So I think that fundamental
piece really carries itself

out to all of these examples.

Go to cannabis stocks next, because
those were getting really hot,

especially around COVID time.

There was legalization in
Canada, legalization kind of

in, in new states in the us.

Justin Dyer: US

Mena Hanna: We saw a lot of
deals on the public and private

side.

Justin Dyer: Yeah, certainly
on the private side,

Mena Hanna: tons of deals on the private
side, and I would bet if I were to go back

and look at those companies, not a lot
of them actually survived because there

was this green rush, a ton of capital
moving into these markets super quickly

before anything was really established.

And yeah, you've seen, you know, at least
in the public market side, some of these

stocks are down 90% since their peaks and.

Unless something miraculous happens,
you are not getting that money back

that is gone for forever, potentially.

Yeah.

Right.

So yeah it's really just a warning.

Justin Dyer: I mean, there's plenty
more examples and we'll probably

weave some into the conversation here.

I want to go back to the
NASDAQ example 'cause I think

that's incredibly important.

It's arguably a diversified index.

So you know, NASDAQ or Nasdaq 100 very
similar, driven by kind of a small

number of stocks when you look into it,
that took almost 15 years to recover.

Now it's a great reminder.

Reason why I want to go back
to it is because the Nasdaq.

Market or NASDAQ index gets a
lot of attention in the present

day because it's done so well
and we are long-term investors.

You all are long-term investors, so it's
good to take that step back and say, oh

yeah, well, it's done exceptionally well.

Over a generally speaking, long
period of time, 10, 15 years, probably

you could sit 15 years, but if you
in started investing in Nasdaq in.

At the bottom 2002, let alone
at the peak in 2000, right?

Your returns look a lot different.

And so this is a long-term game.

And not only are we talking about
chasing hype over very short periods

of time, but even looking at markets.

Over arguably a long period of time, 10,
15 years, like we're talking about Nasdaq

right now, you can be led to different
conclusions and to really believe or ask

yourself the question of this time is
different, which is a big a big mindset

or a common mindset that people get
into around, Hey this is why fads work.

Right?

They're you're convincing
yourself of this time is different

amongst many other things.

Mena Hanna: Yeah, and
especially with the.com

bubble, I think something that we
see in the data that we're presenting

in the mainstream media is a lot
of people just start looking at

returns, starting in the year 2000.

And there's a lot of history and a lot
of data that we have prior to that.

So even the way that you slice and dice
the data can really mislead you on.

How an asset class has performed, how
tech has performed over, you know, a

longer period of time than just the past

Justin Dyer: years.

Yeah, totally.

So there's some data mining,
let's call it, that, lead people

to chase, chase hype, chase fads.

What else contributes to it
in this attention economy, as

Mena Hanna: they

say a lot of it's emotional.

Like it's great to get excited.

I get excited when asset classes roar
and when there's optimism in markets.

And unfortunately also with excitement
comes some certain degree of fomo.

Like you see money being made,
you see people doing well

and you want to participate.

You want to be a part of that.

And it really, unfortunately.

Comes down to when are
you hearing about this?

If you're hearing about this when
your normal, you know, barista

is talking about when, yeah.

If you're getting into Bitcoin when
hearing about your, like, hearing about

it from your 70-year-old uncle, it's
probably too late and you're going

to be on the wrong side of this wave.

If you're hearing about this
early, you happen to get lucky.

You are.

Integrated within the world of venture
where all of this technology is new

and there's actually people that are
fundamentally looking out for new

waves and investing extremely early.

Like some people that we know
have been investing in crypto

since 2010, that makes more sense.

So it really depends on
the source, unfortunately.

And what we've seen in a lot of these
waves and a lot of these cycles is,

these retail investors get in at the
wrong times historically, you know,

but during COVID, a lot of people
had a lot of time on their hands.

They started buying stocks and
you know, you had that GameStop

effect where people were chasing
companies that didn't make money.

Companies that were unprofitable
because it was a joke, it was a meme.

These.

You know, crypto currencies that had
absolutely no value or utility, and it

worked for a period of time and then
it didn't, you know, you have some

economic issues, you have rising interest
rates, it doesn't work, and a lot of

these people end up getting wiped out.

So unfortunately, retail
investors historically haven't

been doing a good job of that.

Now, this time has been a
little bit different this year.

Retail investors bought the Liberation Day
dip quite a bit, so that's a good sign.

Maybe there's more sophistication
and consistency there, but yeah,

nine times outta 10 from the last
few market cycles that we've seen,

people are buying high and selling

low,

Justin Dyer: unfortunately.

Yeah, that's right.

It's like saying this time is
different, has not been a systematic

way to, to invest, at least throughout
the history of, of investing.

So I would caution, caution listeners
to really believe, right, it's, this

time is different until it isn't is
generally the, the way things play out.

What.

Let's shift gears.

So we've talked kind of about okay, fads.

What are they, what, what are
some examples in the present day?

What's the general or common
denominator between, behind them?

But why do they fail?

Mena Hanna: I think they fail
because ultimately, at the end of

the day, our system is a system, and
if you buy something, the way that

you make money is by selling it.

And it's sort of like a
pyramid scheme, like you can't.

Continuously sell off at
crazy valuations forever.

So there is a point of time
in which reality sinks in

and someone is caught holding

Justin Dyer: the bag.

Yep.

That's with fads.

To be clear, that is not
with sophisticated research.

Investing, right?

That is not how we think about the
world and trying to play fad and

figure out who's left holding the bag.

So, to be very clear, I wanna
make sure that's stated.

But yeah, you're right there, there's,
there is, there's a great adage that I

like to think about that in the short
term, the market can be a voting machine.

What we're talking about today, crypto,
in some examples, meme, stocks, et

cetera, like those are little microcosms
of that in extreme examples where

momentum and momentum is actually an
academically studied feature of markets.

In some cases where there.

There's kind of a lack or detachment
from what we call fundamentals, right?

Like what are what's the
underlying business actually doing?

Because when you're investing,
if you're buying stocks, you're

buying a piece of that company.

When you're buying a piece of that
company, you're buying a piece of the

revenue or a piece of the profits or
a right to the profits, your share

of the profits of that business.

If those fundamentals are not there or
they're not growing, then what is your.

Interest, what is that
investment actually worth?

And at some point you go
from a voting machine.

To a weighing machine, like where
a weighing machine has physical

properties and we don't know
when that actually takes hold.

Right.

In times like this, where there is a
little bit of a detachment from reality,

and we're not necessarily saying we're
back in the com era, although there's some

metrics that kind of can go back to that.

And point to the disconnect between
prices and actual, economic fundamentals

are pretty wide, but we don't know
what that tipping point is going to be.

And so having that process and
staying disciplined and paying

attention to long-term fundamentals
and understanding like, Hey, we

might not be with the herd today.

But that's okay.

'cause we're in this game of staying
staying wealthy over the long term.

I think that's a great reminder as well.

And also, no, with a diversified
portfolio you're actually

benefiting from the herd mentality.

You're just doing it in a much

Mena Hanna: disciplined way.

And I actually want to hit on
your point about staying wealthy.

Most of our clients are already wealthy or
are on the trajectory of becoming wealthy.

You don't need to create this,
you don't need to hit the lottery

twice if you are very hard to do.

Yeah.

Very hard to do.

So that is the mindset that
you need to be operating in.

Alright, you've already won the lottery.

You're a world class athlete.

You don't need to buy a hundred
thousand dollars of Pepe Coin

and hope that it 1000 Xs.

Right?

Because you know your
career could do that as is.

And it's exactly what you said.

It's the game of staying wealthy.

And that is very different from
getting to that wealth in general.

That preservation game
is totally different.

So on that note, switching
gears a little bit.

These fads are gonna continue to come up.

There's always going
to be these new waves.

How would you analyze them, review them,
take in all of the information and sort

of systematically go through them via a
checklist to figure out if this is a fad

or maybe if it's a legitimate investment

Justin Dyer: opportunity.

Yeah, sure.

Of course, I have a little bit, some
notes ahead of time as we prepared,

but just running through it real,
real quickly is, does this compliment.

Or fill a part or a piece
of a diversified portfolio.

We were talking earlier today outside
of this conversation that, hey,

if we want to be diversified, you
know, the simple framework there

is, okay, let's own the market.

And so that's a question you could ask.

Is this part of the
market that actually rep?

Or is this something that
represents part of the market

and therefore I want to own it?

If the answer to that is yes,
then okay, you know, check that.

Is there a.

Repeatable methodology to this?

Or is this just a story?

I mean, a great example, present
day example is American Eagle.

I'm sure a lot of people have heard about
the Sydney Sweeney marketing campaign.

That marketing campaign, whatever you
think about it, added $200 million to

American Eagle's market capitalization.

Does American Eagle make better
jeans now and have they turned

that into actual revenue?

I don't think they have quite yet.

Maybe they will because people are
paying attention and we're talking

about it and it will actually end
up in as revenue on the top line.

But at as it stands right
now, that has not happened.

And so.

Yeah.

Right now that is just a story that is
not long-term kind of repeatable process

to and value accretion to that business.

Does the opportunity have sound financials
in a clear path to profitability?

This is kind of in the
startup space, right?

It's not just an idea.

You're not just saying like, like your
example of the Ponzi scheme, right?

Can we just sell this to someone else
because of the story at a higher price?

What's the worst case scenario?

And if you're adding
this to your portfolio.

Mena Hanna: and

Justin Dyer: It can go to zero.

Is that gonna permanently impair
your ability to meet your priorities?

I mean, that is incredibly important.

Do the people running the show
have real experience and integrity?

I mean, gosh, the integrity piece
of it's incredibly important, right?

A lot of these hype involved or hype
induced opportunities end up being.

More than just, Hey, this was an
investment opportunity that went belly up.

It's like this.

There was some sort of grift here
and borderline illegal behavior.

Have you done the work or are
you just following the crowd?

That one I think is probably
the most important here.

Ask the questions.

Understand as much about the
business as you possibly can.

Leave no stone unturned.

Talk to other clients.

Talk to customers.

Validate the idea.

What potential traps can come up
with this fa is this something that,

you know, you're gonna end up facing
a huge tax bill, or the regulators

are gonna come clamping down on it.

And then I, you know, real, as we
kind of wrap here, does it help

achieve long-term objectives?

That's more than just, is this
supporting a diversified portfolio?

Is this actually helping?

Increase your expected returns or
build a more robust portfolio, and

then how often will you kind of
revert back and check to see if the

points above actually still hold true.

So you walk through this list and there's
probably more, this is just like a real

simple framework we put together here.

And if it doesn't pass most of these
it's probably worth just passing, moving

on, and keeping your process in place

Mena Hanna: For now,

I do want to actually touch on two
of the points that you made around

ethics and around also doing the work.

We saw this with FTX.

People were so excited about FTX and
crypto in general, that they decided to

do none of the work and didn't look at the
ethical side at all of the business or.

Justin Dyer: or

Mena Hanna: The partners and really
the leadership and management.

So it is so important to just slow down,
take a step back, really evaluate what

you're doing, and evaluate investment
opportunities for what they are,

who they're actually being run by.

Justin Dyer: by,

Mena Hanna: And not just jumping
on a train because you think that

it's gonna go somewhere cool.

It is so, so important to be diligent
here and unfortunately, sometimes

financial markets force you to not
be diligent and move extremely fast.

And history has shown
us that it's better to.

Be slow and potentially miss
out then move too quickly.

Yeah.

And

Justin Dyer: Well get wiped out

totally.

And it, and it goes back to what we
talked about, this whole I idea mindset

of staying rich, play the stay rich game.

And that leads to process
over hype chasing or fomo.

That leads to just a reminder
that if something sounds too

good to be true, it probably is.

Yeah.

Maybe someone.

Got lucky and got in before
and made some money on it.

That has happened.

But that is not a repeatable
process and way to, to ensure

a, a proba high probability.

A high likelihood of, of keeping your
wealth and even growing it for the

multi-generations that come after you.

So, with that we'll
wrap, uh, today's show.

Stay rational, stay researched,
uh, as we jotted down here.

I really liked that one.

Maybe we'll adopt that
as a a formal tagline.

Until next time, own your wealth,
make an impact, and always be a pro.

Thanks for listening.

Okay.