Evolved Radio

Today's episode questions whether AI is delivering on all those big promises.

There's been a lot of talk in the industry recently—everything from the "doom cycle of AI" to conflicting opinions on what AI is actually capable of right now. Are we in the trough of disillusionment? Are we overselling the tech? Or are we undervaluing the real impact it's having behind the scenes?

To help break this down, I'm joined by two great guests: Michael Evers, CEO at Thread and Mark Alayev, co-founder and Chief of Magic at Thread.

We dig into real-world examples, why so many AI projects are considered "failures," and how the key to success just might be integrating AI into actual business workflows, rather than just handing people shiny new tools and hoping for the best.

We also touch on the future of AI—not just software, but what happens when it starts interacting in real life. Robots, manufacturing, the evolving workforce—you name it.

This is a fun, honest conversation about the messy middle we're living through, and where we're headed next with AI.

This episode is brought to you by Opsleader Pro. A place for MSP owners and managers to get the systems and tools they need to build a stable and growing MSP. Part group coaching, part peer group, everything you need to run a successful MSP.

What is Evolved Radio?

Evolved Radio Podcast: Interviews with technology experts, industry thought leaders, business leaders and other interesting minds. Exploring the evolution of business and technology.

Michael, Mark, welcome to the Evolved Radio podcast.

Thanks for having us. Thanks Todd. So

glad to have you here. You know, there's been a lot of talk in the

industry lately about everyone calling for

the doom cycle of AI. There's a lot of conflicting

opinions about whether or not this is working. So we

wanted to kind of get into some of the details of like why that

is potentially a debate. And Michael, maybe start

with you. You have sort of an interesting perspective on this. Some of

the things that you saw in your travels in the medical

realm where you were before joining thread, do you want to give us kind of

a bit of your backstory and how AI is related?

Sure. To your point that where I've been in the past,

I've spent the last 10 years or so inside the digital health space which

has its own set of challenges outside of the AI piece. But

yeah, for the past prior five years before joining thread, I was working

at a, in a healthcare organization that was building

agents on a kind of a more classic rules based

structure versus what is really more commonplace

today based on the large language models and etc.

But yeah, look,

setting aside kind of the unique challenges of operating in the health

care space and kind of the

different set of rigidity, our clients today in the space that Mark and I

operate on have a set of standards and requirements that we need to

make. They're just kind of uniquely different in healthcare. But I think to your point

about at the beginning where you mentioned

this doomsday and is AI really delivering on kind

of the value prop? I think it really depends on how you

frame the question of that. I think where it may be

failing or perceived to be failing is where the promises

were ahead of its ability to begin with. And

the shiny promise is really easy to sell and that's easy to sell

in almost any industry regardless of

being healthcare or in more of a core technology space,

a place where there's no doubt it's creating value is

some of the back end systems, some of the analysis side of things.

Where I think some of the challenges have come in both in healthcare

and outside of healthcare, is where the

rubber meets the road on real specificity of problem solving,

solution solving, having the

AI or in our case an agent being able to take

an action that brings to resolution. And I think if you're able

to frame the ability of the product and

set the right promise rather than this,

you know, North Star. Always looking at this North Star

type situation, I think it's in a lot of cases been

more successful than maybe we Give it credit or some of the recent

articles. And also, no matter how you look at the

speed at which it's, at which it's moving, I mean,

Mark can certainly speak to, you know, what

thread has been able to develop in other agentic companies

in a much shorter period of time with a much

higher degree of fidelity, a much higher degree of solutioning

for the end user than we would have seen five years

ago. So kind of to end that rant. Yeah,

I think the promises have been too huge

and kind of inset the wrong expectation.

But the underlying, I think if you, you kind of said before we

got on here, you have a little bit different view. And I think I'm with

you. If the expectation is set correctly, it is. Has been incredible.

The advances and the ability to solve day

to day work problems are. It's quite

remarkable. Yeah, it's, you know, the,

the Gartner hype cycle sort of comes to mind here. We had chatted about this

before. We were talking about coming on and like, I don't know that we're

necessarily in the trough of disillusionment yet. Right. I think

it's maybe on the downward trend. Like I think to your point, there

was a lot of sort of unrealistic, unrealistic

expectations of what, what these things were capable of. But at the

same time, the part that I marry up with that is like how much we've

blown past even the most basic expectations

of what an AI should be capable of. Like I heard this conversation on a

podcast and they were talking about like, hey, remember the Turing Test? Like no

one, like that was hot for about five seconds as we ripped past

it and no one seemed to really notice. Right. So like, like

be in a way, like we're actually beyond, I think what the peak

of inflated expectation would have been like. We shot so

far past it that the, the, the drop to the trough of disillusionment

is sort of like almost passing through the workable

cycles, the workable workflows. But we're in this sort of

weird, messy middle of. We expect. Maybe it should be capable of

more because it's not AGI. I don't know. Like, Mark,

what's your take on this? We had a great AI

service unleashed weekly meeting today and I

love your point about Turing Test because we've,

we've now progressed. We are now at the Will Smith

eating spaghetti test and it's

insane. And we've all been like, oh, okay, it's okay, it's conscious and

like spaghetti doesn't crunch and there's steam coming off

the pasta. So we've, we've definitely blown

past that significantly.

What. And I think about this a lot and there's

like two big concepts I want to convey. This is not the

first AI cycle in human history.

This is the second AI cycle. We have

had a nuclear winter for AI after

the first big realization, right. I forget the

guy's name, but the first learning of neural

networks came from a biologist that was also mathematician and he figured

out the neural network and we made a massive leap

and then it just went quiet. Right. And

you know, to Michael's point, like we had to do a lot of

rule based conversation flows

and it went quiet and then the transformer

model from Google came out.

Hilarious that they did not monetize or productize that

and OpenAI did. So I think we're on the cusp of another

big, big

uphill and just like this

explosive growth with gen AI now

there's a lot here. Humans always

overspend. If anyone was around during.com

bubble, man, did we overspend for

pets.com to do something that was probably not

worth it, right? But what, what

was left behind that was infrastructure. What

happened was we went from a thousand dollar T1

lines to 50 DSL lines

and that infrastructure is why Google exists, is

why Amazon exists. So we are definitely

overspending. The question is what's going to be the

infrastructure that's left behind for us to build

upon? Yeah, no, I think that's a really good

prediction that like, you know, maybe we're kind of

misunderstanding what the point is right now. Right. And this kind of

goes to like, I, I kind of bring this up every time we're, we're talking

about AI on the podcast, but you know, I won't do the full detail

of this, but my, my AI sort of prediction timeline

is now three or four years into this. And I

predicted kind of three to five years was usable workflows

and we're well into that. Like there's a lot of very useful

creations, you know, thread certainly being one of them is a

very reusable work workflow use case. And it provides value. Like

those things absolutely exist and it moves on to sort

of later on it becomes something that starts to potentially eat service

desks after five to 10 years. And I think there's a lot of things that

you guys are cooking up that lend to that vision. And

it's not a doom and gloom type thing of like everyone's going to lose their

jobs because AI is taking over. It Definitely pushes people to

higher value work, right? It's commoditization of rote

work within those ecosystems. So if that's the case,

like that's part of what I'm curious about here and I have, I have some,

some opinions I can definitely lend to this. But I'm sure

your guys's perspective on, you know, like the HBR study that came out that

said 81% of AI projects

in business are considered a failure, right? Like, like

why, if we're sort of seeing the early

stages of this golden age of AI, why is everyone

predicting that, you know, we've overstated this and you know,

now everyone's like well crap, maybe we shouldn't have fired all those people

at sales and Microsoft because now we have to hire

80% of them back, right? Like what is the tension between those,

like is it, is it oversold or you know, is,

are we sort of missing the mark on what we're actually supposed to be achieving

right now? I think it's probably a little bit of both

and we have to be careful to not be a little bit of the

self fulfilling in that. Right? If you're a big major company,

leave them nameless. But any of them, or any company, large or small, who

you make a commitment and you go out and you get ahead of your

understanding of the practical application of

the technology in this case, you know, agentic that we're talking about,

then there's this pressure to live up

to. Oh, you said it was going to replace, pick a department. You said it

was going to replace your legal department. Well,

you know, if you're a public company, you better show

some evidence that that occurred because you've suggested it

happened rather than, because I think because of the,

some of the stuff we talked about, the promise is so

huge and the reality is

some of the stuff is so amazing that it's really easy

to take a look and say look, it fundamentally can do this. Well,

we can jump all the way to there. It's like, it's

like almost, it's, it's almost human nature

to kind of jump to the end of the, right to the end of the

rainbow or, or whatever it is rather than

understanding that it's not understanding, you know, being methodical

that everything is a step process, right? You've got to,

your legal team's got to know how to use it and where the value creation

is before you could not have one or, or

to the point you guys made, you said earlier, how do you up level

skill set, how do you get These people in any department doing

higher value creation things

rather than kind of time,

workforce burning less optimal things.

And I love that. Can I, can I add on? I don't know if you.

Man, there's two big things that are happening

economically. We went crazy on

cryptocurrency. We went through Covid.

We've inflated the market. We

needed a way to generate more value. I don't know what

would have happened if we didn't get the gen

inflection point. So I think big business

needed a soft landing. Right. Or they needed a way

of, of progressing forward. And I think,

I think we've saved all the crypto farms because I'm pretty sure all the GPUs

are now used for AI. But also there's

a lot of inflation in the economy. There's a lot. And so we're trying

to figure out unemployment

is low, salaries are high. So what do we do?

How do we, how do we fix the labor market? And I think there's this

big demand for us right now to figure out the digital work

because if we can do will heal our economy, at least in

the United States, it will heal our economy. So I think with

Harvard Business Review, they're obviously going after the large companies. So I think

that's why we're seeing that pressure there.

Yeah, I think, look, some of the challenges

right now, are you looking at a very high level.

There's a couple dozen companies driving this perceived. If

you look at the market, this market explos. Whereas the

reality for those major companies that have

their point, that have their AI plan mapped out and

they're building the data centers and they're building the hardware and

they're building the processing power. Those are very clear.

The vast majority of the companies in the US

around the world, and certainly our customers, they're figuring out

how to deploy it really effectively. And everyone uses it and

touches it on their computer, they do searches with it, they do whatever. But from

practical workflow utilization. What do you mean? We're taking my wedding

photos and making them anime is not productive to the economy.

Yeah, it's my favorite activity. We're still like the

average company. The business model isn't as clear as an

Nvidia or somebody who's building the data centers. In

addition to that, we're still settling in. Mark mentioned the broader

economy. Like what is it doing? Right. As these data centers

absorb the electricity and power, there'll be

other investments in new sources of power at the same time.

Until those are there, we all might see our Electric bills go

up. Right? Because supply and demand, right?

So if there's that, or terraforming the. Planet

to be a compositional brain. It's wild.

It's insane. I do have one thing I really like.

I need to get off my chest. Let him do it.

There's a big difference between a proof of concept

and production rate. There has not been

that big of a difference in traditional software development.

Like, sure, you haven't thought about all the workflows. You haven't thought about

all the use cases, obviously. However,

this is the first time we're talking about indeterministic

code. This is code that's making its decisions.

And it's a completely different game. It might look

great, but every time when we first started to

QA our voice agent, every time we'd pick up,

what would we say? I have a printer problem. I have a printer problem.

I have a printer. I was like, this is awesome.

It's so good. But I never thought maybe it's just

good at printer problems. Because when you get

into production and it's not a printer problem,

it's a lack of connectivity, it's

a broken dll. It just acts

completely differently. And so I think the

combination of the, the. The pressure economically to

find the next way to heal, but

also seeing those little POCs, they're like, yeah, I'm

Clara, baby. I'm gonna fire 700 people.

And it's not going so well. Maybe we should reverse

out of that. Because people actually have hard,

hard questions. And it's not all about, like, I need a refund.

Yeah. And this, this sort of gets to, like, my feeling. I have two things

that I think are sort of at the core of. Of those. Those numbers

of the percentages of failed AI projects in business. And

one, I think is. Is sort of the majority of it is

the historical percentage of failed

IT projects in general is. Is

catastrophically high. Right. So, like, sure

to say 81% fail. But if we're starting from a base baseline of

64% of IT projects fail, which is. Is a

general stat, then we're really not that far off the mark. So I don't feel

like this is as. As sort of as

diminishing to AI as a project as a whole. In business,

it's more to the point of AI, of IT is messy,

and the implementation often doesn't go the way that we think because of poor project

management, because of scope creep, because of people issues.

And I think where that gets married. Up with it's always people issues.

Project Management is as simple as who does what by when. And then you add

people and things get complicated, right? So like I think

the other core of this is that a lot of the AI,

like well, I'm using air quotes here for the audio listeners. Like

AI deployments and projects were largely just sort of,

hey, we turned on Copilot for you guys. Go forth and prosper,

right? And it was, or you know, we subscribed to Gemini. You

know, you guys, you guys now have access to these tools and then you go

back and you check with people who have not had any level of training

and have no concept of how to utilize these things in their day to

day operations. Like, hey, is that, that, how's that been? It's been

amazing, right? Like it's totally revolutionized your work. And they're like,

I got nothing. Like I didn't find it that useful. They're like, failed

project, I guess. AI didn't save our business, right? So I think those

are the things that are largely at work. And I've been even kind of amazed.

You know, I've been working on some, some AI projects and

as a part of this I've been interviewing a lot of MSPs and

technologists and saying if you had an AI army to

build some workflows for you to automate some things, to insert some

agentic capabilities in your day to day operations to save you money

and time, what would you do? And the level

of sort of sophistication and creativity in those

responses from highly technical people that are very aware of what their

business is have been very routine. It's like really like

we need to scratch a little deeper and think about some things that like that

we could really sort of leverage and blow the doors off of the capabilities

and allow people to do more. So if you assume

that the IT people that are immersed in this all day and have a pretty

good sense of what this stuff does, they can't come up with great use cases

for how to deploy it and how to you how to leverage it for workflows.

How are you going to expect that like Sarah from accounting

and Jim in the marketing group are any

further ahead in figuring out like exactly what they need from

a workflow standpoint. And this is where I think like

the core of this really comes down to is a lot of this kind

of needs to be programmatic and determined because just to say to

people you have AI, it will be amazing for your work

ends up as a dead end, right? So I'll sort of

end my rant there and leave you guys to sort of jump back in on

this. What do you think, Mark? I haven't earned. We

haven't earned secret here.

The reason for our success is because we

pair workflows with AI.

It's not about telling people to use AI when they need it. You

need to put it into the workflow. Right. The difference

between telling accounts payable

person, hey, I got you a Claude subscription. It's

awesome. And telling them that every

invoice that comes in will process added to the

database. And I'll tell you at the end of the

day what is the breakdown of invoices

from vendors. Let me help you prioritize.

So the key to success here is a workflow

that's deterministic. Like this is a real use case.

I need to figure like msps, man.

Reconciling vendor

invoices to billing to your customers is

insane. Yep. And of course you can give them

Claude, but you need to ingrain yourself in

that workflow. You need to get every invoice

and automatically process it and read the

invoice and break it down. Like that's been, that's

been so instrumental and I think that's what a lot of people aren't

doing. You're right. It's so, it's hilarious. Co pilot.

Great, Claude. Awesome.

But it's not part of a workflow. And what Mark's talking about, when it really

becomes just peripheral through society.

Right. To where it's just, it's when somebody's

used it all day and they don't realize they've used it because

it's just culturally part where it is not.

I'm taking a specific action that

will engage this AI thing.

Somebody said to me from my prior

career, healthcare moves in decades,

not in quarters or not in years. In

a lot of ways. Everybody we talk to is still early

adopter. Right. I mean to the average

330 plus some a million Americans out there, our. Industry is

an early adopter. Yeah. And the subset of people.

Yeah. And if you stick to the decade is what creates

change. I mean I think just about my kids, they're

adults now and simple things

like they want to know why I'd call

instead of just text them. I mean it was only

15 years that that wouldn't have been an option. So

maybe not quite the decade. Mark's kids

will not know a world where

AI isn't influencing almost

every piece of technology they touch.

They won't. For good and for bad both.

But again, kind of to my early where I started that

it's about kind of to where

Mark was going in that

it's embedding the solution using AI solution

in your day to day workflow. So it's just part of what

you're doing. And that's when

those big promises that maybe that article was suggesting the

81% aren't achieving. That's when we start to. We see the

reverse of that and it's 80% of them are achieving and maybe

20% or not. It's also last thing I'll say on

that. If we go really long term and we talk

about Mark, you were talking about the way people think about

planning a workflow or planning a solution. His kids

at their age, they won't know that that's just how they will think.

So everyone knows my kids are four and five. Oh. So yes.

Minor adults. Yeah, but right. You're absolutely right.

You're absolutely right. My kids like okay, you're tired of telling

me stories. Can you have the AI tell me a story about Sonic?

I'm like. That'S crazy.

Like how did you come to that conclusion?

You know, because it just. But I would say like this is really important.

Like this is really important. It's not

just AI, you need to get into workflow. If you

don't get it into workflow, you will fail.

It needs to be part of a workflow.

So let's build on that because like, like,

I mean I understand what I. Well maybe I'll preface that. I

think I understand what you mean. Right. Of like, like we actually map out a

full process. We understand what instigates a certain action

or some. Something, something. An activity

and then it leads through a bunch of actions and creates in some type

of endpoint. Right. Like

is that sort of all we're thinking about in a workflow? And understanding that

enough is being more detailed and understanding what are the

actions we take on initiation of something

towards an end goal. Is that kind of what. What you're thinking about when you're

talking about workflows? Yes.

Very high level. Right? Yeah. Business process mining.

Yes. Yeah. Right. Like there's a trigger. It's typically,

you know, someone reaching out. There's a communication layer. But I

think what the most important part that people aren't realizing

is that if you map out, if you just forget AI if you

just map out the whole business process, it starts to

branch heavily towards the end. Right. Always it

becomes wild. Oh, this customer is on this

plan. Oh, this customer. We promised them something.

We always promise. Right. Like everyone, everyone promises a customer

something. And so what I have found is that the

first two, three, four steps of a business process

are typically linear, but then what

happens is you hire a middle manager to be that,

that branching point, like, oh, this needs to go here, or

oh, we need to do this. What we're finding

is you can, you can automate 1, 2, 3, 4

and 5 is where you put your AI.

5 is where you say, oh, we promised this to a

customer. Do not bill them for this. 5 is where

you say, this is a security issue. Get

it over to the security team as soon as humanly possible.

And I love William. I will give him a shout

out forever. William from Integratech, he said a

great line. AI is here. And we want to use

AI to make service more human. It's not

about responding back to the other person that's triggered the

workflow, but it's about getting it to the right person

in the right context with the right information.

So like, that's been like our, our pillar.

So. And this kind of goes to like, I think the way that

maybe people are misusing the technology in a lot of ways. Like, I see this

as very similar to sort of

the other tools that get used and how people migrate away from them.

We talked about sort of the generational changes of how people utilize

technology. Right. And you know, I use Perplexity all day

and I barely use Google anymore, and that's a fairly recent

transition for me. But I know a lot of people, you know, their, their,

their default is to, to still Google stuff. You know, I have these conversations with,

with my wife and instead of her doing. I had the same conversation with my

wife, by the way. It's hilarious. Yeah, like she'll Google stuff and then ask

me to ask the AI. It's like, well, you know, you can do this too,

right? Like, so I think there's a lot of that of people are somewhat

comfortable with the way that they operate, the way that they deploy these technologies, the

way that they think about the activities that they need. And honestly, one of the

biggest shifts that I've had with AI was, you

know, for years I was still using it like

a search engine. Like I was sort of one or three shot prompting everything.

And then a person made a very sort of simple suggestion to

me. They're like, treat it like a co worker. And that was a huge unlock

for me. And just the way that I interacted with AI and made it a

lot more capable because the expectation was

just slightly different about how I engaged with it and

as I sort of explained this and we've had this conversation, I think

I'm more, maybe more convinced, like, you guys opinion on this.

Like, maybe we are on the slope of enlightenment and the Gartner

hype cycle because now we have a better understanding of how to interact

with and how to prescribe the technology's use,

right? To just sort of say, here's a tool and you know

you're going to do amazing work, right? Like, if you think of it in a

very sort of, sort of pedestrian way of like,

you know, here's a, here's a wrench, right, To a person who

needs a hammer. And they're like, great, I don't really understand what this does

for me. So I'm just going to go back and do what I was doing

before. And like, they're like, he doesn't understand, doesn't understand how to use this

tool, right? Like, this has been a total failure. Why wasn't this,

you know, creating massive outcomes the way that we saw it? I think there's a

lot of similarity to that. So I think your point about like, the definition of

understanding how the work actually flows through the organization

and where are the intersections where we can actually start to insert

some of these agentic actions and utilize

AI more as a co worker or a team member than

just sort of a tool unto itself. Any thoughts on that?

Yes. I have thoughts.

Michael, you want to go first or should I? You go, I'll do cleanup on

this one. Yeah, that's absolutely

right. And I think, you know, we just had our keynote

and we get this question a lot because Thread

is becoming a little notorious for automating, dispatching work.

We are for better or for worse. And

folks are asking us like, well, are you scared to talk to

MSPs? Like, aren't their dispatchers scared to get Thread?

And we had this deep reflection where we realized

where AI is today. We're not replacing

100% of any job, of any role.

What we're seeing is that we

are moving to a supervisor relationship with the AI.

It is a coworker, but it's very important to understand it's a supervisor

relationship. And when I found out that Waymo was doing,

it's all, it's, you know, autonomous driving, but

behind all those cars, there's a person with an

Xbox controller looking at nine cars.

And if any of them get stuck, they use an Xbox controller to get

out. Now, is it better than

hiring nine drivers? Absolutely,

absolutely. So I think the role, what's, what's Happening.

And again, like I said, like, we'll see

how many, how many more inflection points we have. But the relationship

is a co working relationship, but it's a supervisory

relationship. We're not going to get rid of all the dispatchers. We're going to

make the dispatchers that are the best, the supervisors.

We're not going to get rid of the technicians. We're going to make the best

technicians supervise their little army,

their digital workforce. Because you're right, they can reason,

they can talk, they can't innovate. And the world has

entropy. So how do we handle entropy? Humans are great at

entropy. So I believe it's

really important for us to recognize this. I

believe that jobs will be automated, like jobs to be done,

like prioritizing, categorizing or driving someone

a mile. But I don't think roles

will be fully destroyed. I think roles are going to become

supervisory roles. I like that vision.

I think, look to your point about where are we on the curve? If we

started that curve,

we're, we're really early because

even the really early adopters still, I'll still

get on an engineering stand up with Mark and the team

and there'll be a new release from one of the large models.

And we're still saying that group who live and breathe

it. Holy crap. Look at, look at what this one does.

You know, just the release three months ago

didn't do X in 18 months. Before that,

you know, seemed like an, you know, it's the difference between an

infant to a teenager and kind of its, its

capabilities. And that is, that's people

like Mark's engineering and product team and the company's team

living and breathing it. Whereas look,

I, I think about, you know, the

masses of people think about, just go through my family. I've got a lawyer

and my brother's a school teacher and one's a lawyer and one's a

works in retail. And like they are not,

they are. Not medical industry radiologists.

Yeah. They're just not what a radiologist organization standpoint. Like they're

not, they don't, they don't yet have the

opportunity to. And if they do, it's it's out of human

curiosity. Right. You know what I mean? And to your point about.

Yeah. Tinkering and to point about, about specific

workflows like my brother who has been a

schoolteacher for years, you know, we all know about the

challenges of teachers. Like did the paper get written? Did they write themselves? And

you know, so there's a whole other set of challenges. So certainly

he is. He is teaching himself and

educating himself on those practical applications, on how

it's impacting his environment and being sure that

like, you know, kids still have license

to learn and that kind of thing. But again, it's. It's fairly

isolated to the more not the

advanced stuff. So to your point of the book, I

Super early I think in that. In that curve

maybe not as early for the marks of the world even

for me. Todd, I want to flip it back on you. I have a question

for you. I have. I want to know your thoughts on this, if that's

okay. Sure. You know, Jensen is

obviously the CEO of Nvidia is. Yeah.

Fixing shovels. Win any gold rush. Yep.

And he said a quote and I was like, yes, we are not forgotten.

The IT department of every company is going

to be the HR department of AI

agents. Ooh, I like that.

Yeah. TNHR have been new

user onboarding termination. I. I just. I would love to

hear your thoughts about that. Yeah. In Jensen's

a brilliant dude. There's a lot I disagree with about Jensen's

management style, which is a separate podcast seems to have worked

for him. But holy hell, the. That

image I think is really smart because if I

pull that back to something that's a bit more familiar right now, and that being

the extrapolation from IT is outsourcing has become a lot

more practical for IT organizations post Covid because

it just removed all the geographic barriers on where people work

from. And one of the things that I insisted very early on

when I encouraged people to consider outsourcing was

that they said, oh, I've tried that. It doesn't work. I'm like, yeah,

but you probably abdicated a lot of the responsibility. And you

know, hey, we hired this person. They should work remotely. They're good

at what they do. And you know, none of that happened. But

you never spent any time with them. You didn't treat them like a staff member.

So of course the results were different. So the

extrapolation of that I think is now that we'll have an

AI workforce, we have to understand the.

The workflow analysis and kind of figuring out

like what the business patterns are and therefore how we can insert AI into it.

So I think there's a very natural marriage there of like the business

consulting aspect of it is becoming more prevalent because

the, you know, the just the break fix and the support requirements

are lower. And you know, once the AI start to

live inside the. The business's analysis gets complete and figure out

sort of where the agentic capabilities are and you know, building on

those workflows, there still needs someone to kind of manage and operate

those like from that supervisory position. Right. To hire them.

Yeah, exactly. Like we, we understand sort of like which agent

is particularly good at this type of role. And you know,

we manage some of the exceptions based on sort of a decision tree

because stuff happens, right. Work and people are messy and

you know, how do we step in when, when someone requires a bit of intervention

on that when it's dealing with, you know, an AI

team member. So I, I think that's, I think that's a cool vision. I really

like that as an, as an idea.

I couldn't agree more. Right. And there's so much opportunity for us. This

is why there's so much excitement in the MSP industry. Like we

are going to be the HR for, for agents.

And I, I just want to, you know, Todd, please, let's keep going.

But I just love the relationship between IT

and hr. Who's working and what tools do

they have to get leverage in their work. Where the tools

where the fire. Currently. I agree. Yeah. But look

what's happening in the industry. Rippling deal just

works. They're all starting to launch little like

device management, onboarding and off board.

I think that's going to be apart from the AI curve. I think that

the marriage between IT and HR is going to be an interesting one.

So I mean, obviously I could talk with you guys for hours on

this. I want to look. To sort of close it up. I'll sort of drop

one more here. That is really outside of sort of the

basics of what we're talking about here. But Mark, I'm sure you've put some thought

to this because I know that you live, eat and breathe this stuff.

What are your thoughts on RL AI like, especially

as we start to embody AI into RL

real life. Like, like robots basically being

human AI and starting to interact with, with the real world.

You know, I, I've been thinking a lot about this recently. You have any,

any thoughts on, on sort of the, the putting AI out

into the world and having it interact in that fashion?

We've, we've run out of training data. There's a big problem.

That's why I'm saying the last AI winter

perhaps may not be the only one

we've run out of training data because the

LLMs that we have today have learned everything they possibly can

from all of our Reddit posts and all the junk we've put online. It's

petabytes. It's great, but we're running out of data.

I think there's two angles here. I think that AI needs

eyes. It needs to, it needs to. You

know, our eyesight consumes more information

per second than any other of our senses.

So I think there's, there will be an effort to get

more information. So I think it's a natural progression of, of giving

it senses in a certain sense. And

I think that's really interesting. Now

what I'm really excited about is I think,

manufacturing. And

I'll go back like after we had a disaster in New York,

you know, the MSP I worked for, we bought the Sprint Data center

in Purchase, New York, and we ran a data center

and there's like predictive hardware failures

and you just need to swap out a hard drive from a SATA drive. It's

like we could figure it out. We just need someone to do it.

So I, I think that on the manufacturing side and on data center

side, I think we're going to see some of those,

some of those things automated that are not as important as, for

example, figuring out the energy problem or figuring out how to get

smaller in our silicon manufacturing or get to

quantum computing. But I, I

think there's a desire to feed more information into the

AI because we've run out. We have a big problem. We've run out. We're

now using synthetic data, but also to help on that

manufacturing side. Michael, what do you think?

I'm gonna go more human, philosophical.

That's what we work together, Michael. Perfect. I

think if those robots, humanoids,

real life, play a role in where Mark

went, where the agent, where it's inserting and improving,

obviously huge value there. I think on a human level,

I think we learned a little bit from COVID in those years. We

as people get a lot from interaction and being around each other.

So if it over a decade or more would create an environment

where we're doing less interaction with each

other, I think that's not great for

us just as people and as

relationship. I've kept referring to kids in the generational.

I mean, I'm not that old, but I mean, I can remember when my

daytime activity was go outside and play with your friends.

Like that was what after school was. And then one

generation back there, the video games and all, which is, which is great.

And it's developed our minds in different ways. But

on the human level, I hope we deploy them

where it makes us better and not

the other way around. Yeah, I share that sentiment.

As a technologist and someone who is very excited about this stuff,

I learned in Covid that despite the fact that I consider myself

an introvert once it was no longer an option to interact with

people, it affected me. I think you're absolutely right that

there. There needs to be. Still needs to be humanity in this. And I

think that'll be a tricky. A tricky tightrope for us as well as we start.

I love how. I love the angle that Michael took. And

Michael knows this. I don't have TVs. My kids have

zero screen time. I

understand. Considering how nerdy you are. Yeah, no, I understand.

I understand the problem. Yeah.

But I also, you know, like, maybe we can manufacture

stuff easier without people getting their fingers cut off. That's where

I'm like, that's important. Or a humanoid going down

and just sort of, like, pulling dead GPUs, slamming in a new one to the

array and moving down the line, basically. Definitely. Yeah, definitely.

Cool. Well, this has been really fun, you guys. Appreciate you coming on.

We'll link to everything thread in the show notes and

link to you guys on LinkedIn if anyone wants to reach out, but appreciate your

time. Thank you. Thanks so much. All right, people.