Echoes in the Dark with Rae Wilson

Send a Question for the Book Club or a Story Request

"The next evening, at about the same hour... and again the mysterious phenomenon occurred..."

Society has so many unspoken rules, but should all the rules be followed? And if so, then at what cost? In this short story by Ambrose Bierce, readers are invited to reflect on their own community's unspoken rules. Rae Wilson shares her observations on Bierce's words and invites you to question your own neighborly behavior.

Read the Story

Music by:

Sneaky Snitch by Kevin MacLeod http://incompetech.com

Creative Commons — Attribution 3.0 Unported — CC BY 3.0

Free Download / Stream: http://bit.ly/sneaky-snitch

Music promoted by Audio Library https://youtu.be/7-rXQALDv-4

-------------

Monster Heat - by David Fesliyan

Support the show

★ Support this podcast on Patreon ★

What is Echoes in the Dark with Rae Wilson?

In the oral tradition of storytelling, Echoes in the Dark, delivers classic works of gothic fiction weekly. Hosted and curated by Ms. Rae (an award-winning educator, actor, and literary analyst) the collection of stories spans popular works by authors like Edgar Allan Poe  as well as lesser known works by authors such as Guy de Maupassant. Each story is followed by a literary analysis. 


If you’re looking to enjoy more classic literature, struggle to find the time to read, hate reading, or just love listening to stories, then this podcast is for you. 


A Note on Content: While these stories are generally appropriate for listeners aged 12 and up, classic Gothic literature frequently explores themes of murder, romantic affairs, and "tortured souls." Stories are performed exactly as written in their original historical context. 


If you are looking to learn more ways to boost your literary analysis visit:

Speaker: Welcome to Echoes in the
Dark, a podcast dedicated to the
oral tradition of storytelling.

Speaker: If you're looking to enjoy
more classic literature, struggle to
find the time to read, hate

Speaker: reading, or just love
listening to stories, then this
podcast is for you.

Speaker: At the end of each story,
I'll share my analysis on the
story's deeper meanings.

Speaker: A Vine on a House by
Ambrose Bierce is a short story that
was originally published

Speaker: in 1905 in Cosmopolitan
magazine and later republished in
1913 as a part of a collection

Speaker: of short stories by Bierce.

Speaker: The entire story is told in
third-person objective, which means
as we're reading through, we're

Speaker: kind of like a fly on a
wall, observing everything that is
happening.

Speaker: If you want to follow
along, you can get a copy on my
website BetterEssayWriting.com.

Speaker: A Vine on a House by
Ambrose Bierce.

Speaker: About three miles from the
little town of Norton in Missouri,
on the road leading to

Speaker: Maysville, stands an old
house that was last occupied by a
family named Harding.

Speaker: Since 1886, no one has
lived in it, nor is anyone likely to
live in it

Speaker: again.

Speaker: Time and the disfavor of
persons dwelling thereabout are
converting it into a rather
picturesque ruin.

Speaker: An observer unacquainted
with its history would hardly put it
in the category of haunted houses.

Speaker: Yet in all the region
around, such is its evil reputation.

Speaker: Its windows are without
glass, its doorways without doors.

Speaker: There are wide breaches in
the shingle roof, and for lack of
paint, the weatherboarding is

Speaker: a done gray.

Speaker: But these unfailing signs
of the supernatural are partly
concealed and greatly softened by
the abundant

Speaker: foliage of a large vine
overrunning the entire structure.

Speaker: This vine, of a species no
botanist has ever been able to name,
has an important

Speaker: part in the story of the
house.

Speaker: The Harding family
consisted of Robert Harding, his
wife Matilda, Miss Julia Wentz, and
she was

Speaker: her sister, and two young
children.

Speaker: Robert Harding was a
silent, cold-mannered man who made
no friends in the neighborhood, and

Speaker: apparently cared to make
none.

Speaker: He was about 40 years old,
frugal and industrious, and made a
living from the little

Speaker: farm which is now overgrown
with brush and brambles.

Speaker: He and his sister-in-law
were rather tabooed by their
neighbors, who seemed to think

Speaker: they were seen too
frequently.

Speaker: Not entirely their fault,
for at these times they evidently
did not challenge observation.

Speaker: The Moricodes of rural
Missouri is stern and exacting.

Speaker: Mrs. Harding was a gentle,
sad-eyed woman, lacking a left foot.

Speaker: At some time in 1884, it
became known that she had gone to
visit her mother

Speaker: in Iowa.

Speaker: That was what her husband
said in reply to inquiries, and his
manner of saying it

Speaker: did not encourage further
questioning.

Speaker: She never came back, and
two years later, without selling his
farm or anything that was

Speaker: his, or appointing an agent
to look after his interests, or
moving his household goods, Harding,

Speaker: with the rest of the
family, left the country.

Speaker: Nobody knew where he went.

Speaker: Nobody at the time cared.

Speaker: Naturally, whatever was
movable about the place soon
disappeared, and the deserted house
became haunted in

Speaker: the manner of its kind.

Speaker: One summer evening, four or
five years later, the Reverend J.

Speaker: Gruber of Norton and a
Maysville attorney named Hyatt met
on horseback in front of the

Speaker: Harding place.

Speaker: Having business matters to
discuss, they hitched their animals
and went to the house, sat on

Speaker: the porch to talk.

Speaker: Some humorous reference to
the somber reputation of the place
was made and forgotten as soon

Speaker: as it was uttered, and they
talked of their business affairs
until it grew almost dark.

Speaker: The evening was
oppressively warm.

Speaker: The air stagnant.

Speaker: Presently, both men started
from their seats in surprise.

Speaker: A long vine that covered
half the front of the house and
dangled its branches from

Speaker: the edge of the porch above
them was visibly and audibly
agitated, shaking violently and ever

Speaker: -stammingly.

Speaker: We shall have a storm,
Hyatt explained.

Speaker: Gruber said nothing, but
silently directed the other's
attention to the foliage of adjacent
trees, which

Speaker: showed no movement.

Speaker: Even the delicate tips of
the boughs silhouetted against the
clear sky were motionless.

Speaker: They hastily passed down
the steps to what had been a lawn
and looked upward at

Speaker: the vine, whose entire
length was now visible.

Speaker: It continued in violent
agitation, yet they could not
discern no disturbing cause.

Speaker: Let us leave, said the
minister.

Speaker: And leave they did.

Speaker: Forgetting that they had
been traveling in opposite
directions, they rode away together.

Speaker: They went to Norton, where
they related their strange
experience to several discreet
friends.

Speaker: The next evening, at about
the same hour accompanied by two
others whose names are not

Speaker: recalled, they were again
on the porch of the Hardin house,
and again the mysterious phenomenon

Speaker: occurred.

Speaker: The vine was violently
agitated while under the closest
scrutiny from root to tip, nor did

Speaker: their combined strength
applied to the trunk serve to still
it.

Speaker: After an hour's
observation, they retreated no less
wise, it is thought, than when they
had

Speaker: come.

Speaker: No great time was required
for these singular facts to rouse
the curiosity of the entire

Speaker: neighborhood.

Speaker: By day and by night, crowds
of persons assembled at the Hardin
house, seeking a sign.

Speaker: It does not appear that any
found it, yet so credible were the
witnesses mentioned that

Speaker: none doubted the reality of
the manifestations to which they
testified.

Speaker: By either a happy
inspiration or some destructive
design, it was one day proposed.

Speaker: Nobody appeared to know
from whom the suggestion came.

Speaker: To dig up the sign, and
after a good deal of debate, this
was done.

Speaker: Nothing was found but the
root, yet nothing could have been
more strange.

Speaker: For five or six feet from
the trunk, which had at the surface
of the ground

Speaker: a diameter of several
inches, it ran downward, single and
straight, to a loose, friable earth.

Speaker: Then it divided, and some
divided, into rootlets, fibers, and
filaments, most curiously
interwoven.

Speaker: When carefully freed from
soil, it showed a singular
formation.

Speaker: In their ramifications and
doublings back upon themselves, they
made a compact network, having in
size

Speaker: and shape of an amazing
resemblance to the human figure.

Speaker: Head, trunk, and limbs were
there.

Speaker: Even the fingers and toes
were distinctly defined, and many
professed to see in the distribution

Speaker: and arrangement of the
fibers in the global mass
representing the head, a grotesque
suggestion of

Speaker: a face.

Speaker: The figure was horizontal.

Speaker: The smaller roots had begun
to unite at the wrists.

Speaker: In point of resemblance to
the human form, this image was
imperfect.

Speaker: At about ten inches from
one of the knees, the cilia forming
that leg had abruptly

Speaker: doubled backward and inward
upon their coarse growth.

Speaker: That figure lacked the left
foot.

Speaker: There was but one
inference, the obvious one, but
ensuing excitement as many courses
of action

Speaker: were proposed, as there
were incapable counselors.

Speaker: The matter was settled by
the sheriff of the county, who, as
the law focus study

Speaker: of the abandoned estate,
ordered the root replaced and the
excavation filled with the earth
that

Speaker: had been removed.

Speaker: Later inquiry brought out
only one fact of relevancy and
significance.

Speaker: Mrs. Hardin had never
visited her relatives in Iowa, nor
did they know that she was

Speaker: supposed to have done so.

Speaker: Of Robert Hardin and the
rest of his family, nothing is
known.

Speaker: The house retains its evil
reputation, but the replanted vine
is as orderly and well-behaved

Speaker: a vegetable as a nervous
person could wish to sit under of a
pleasant night when

Speaker: the care did great out
there.

Speaker: Immemorial revelation in
the distant whippoorpool signifies
its

Speaker: notion of what ought to be
done about it.

Speaker: So that was A Vine on a
House by Ambrose Bierce, and when I
sat down

Speaker: to actually analyze this
story, I found that I had way more
questions than I normally

Speaker: would after reading and
analyzing a story.

Speaker: So one thing that comes to
my mind is the fact that it was
published in

Speaker: Cosmopolitan magazine.

Speaker: As soon as I saw that, I
said, oh my goodness, is that the
same Cosmopolitan

Speaker: magazine that is around
today?

Speaker: And actually, yes and no.

Speaker: So Cosmopolitan magazine
was first published in 18, I think
it was 1884, and then it

Speaker: didn't become a women's
magazine until much later.

Speaker: So I want to say 1967.

Speaker: So I thought that was kind
of interesting because apparently
Cosmopolitan magazine used to be a

Speaker: magazine for all genders,
all people, and the same way Playboy
originally started out as being

Speaker: something where you would
be able to read like really
in-depth, interesting, amazing
articles, and

Speaker: then you'd see some
pictures of pretty ladies, over time
that production changed, right?

Speaker: So we can say the same for
Cosmopolitan magazine, even though
Cosmopolitan magazine was ultimately
purchased

Speaker: by a different publisher.

Speaker: So I just found that
interesting, like are they trying to
tell women that you got

Speaker: to be careful because your
husband might just have an affair
with your sister and murder

Speaker: you and bury you in the
ground?

Speaker: But since Cosmo wasn't
purely directed at women back there,
I'm gonna assume that that was

Speaker: not the author's intent.

Speaker: Full disclosure, the accent
I put on earlier was not
specifically a Missouri accent.

Speaker: I've only been to Missouri
like twice in my life, and as with
any state or

Speaker: country, people speak
differently in all different parts
of that state or country.

Speaker: So the way one person
speaks in, say, St. Louis might be
completely different than the

Speaker: way someone speaks in a
more rural part of Missouri.

Speaker: So if you're like, hey that
accent, it didn't sound authentic to
me, it was just

Speaker: a generic kind of Southern
twang, so don't come at me.

Speaker: All right, now let's get
back to the questions that I had.

Speaker: Like, why did the husband
move?

Speaker: So he lived in that house
for two years after he murdered his
wife.

Speaker: I'm assuming he murdered
his wife.

Speaker: Did the sister also have
something to do with the wife's
murder?

Speaker: Did they do it together?

Speaker: Is she a victim of
circumstance?

Speaker: And she kind of later finds
out that he's murdered, technically,
her sister.

Speaker: But then the fact that the
sister didn't exactly try to hide
her relationship from the

Speaker: neighbors, could that be
because she was a meanie and she was
in cahoots with the

Speaker: husband?

Speaker: Or was she, like I said, a
victim of circumstance?

Speaker: And maybe she didn't have a
choice as to whether or not she was
being seen

Speaker: with him because he was a
mean guy and maybe he was
threatening her in the

Speaker: same way he threatened his
wife.

Speaker: Okay, so why did he move?

Speaker: You lived there for two
years, you can't tell me that for
two years you didn't

Speaker: smell the body.

Speaker: Did he move because his
dead wife was like shaking vines at
the place?

Speaker: Was she, I mean the whole
vine would not have covered the
house while he was

Speaker: still living there.

Speaker: So was there any kind of
fine?

Speaker: Did he move out of guilt?

Speaker: Did he move because he felt
that he might get caught someday?

Speaker: Or was he just like, yeah,
you know what, I don't want to live
here anymore,

Speaker: let's bounce.

Speaker: So he moves, have no clue
why, the author chooses not to get
into this and

Speaker: that's fair.

Speaker: The same way that the
author chooses not to give us any
real detail as to

Speaker: whether or not the sister
wanted to be involved with the
husband.

Speaker: So maybe this information
is given to us because for the
author this stuff is not

Speaker: important.

Speaker: I'm definitely interested,
like what happened to this woman's
foot?

Speaker: She's got no left foot.

Speaker: Did the husband have
something to do with that missing
foot?

Speaker: Was he an abusive man?

Speaker: I mean the fact that she
winds up dead after he, well he, she
winds up

Speaker: dead.

Speaker: He tells people she's going
to go visit her family and then he
mysteriously disappears as

Speaker: well.

Speaker: That kind of makes me think
that this woman had been in an
abusive relationship.

Speaker: But the author does not
explain why the left foot is missing
and whether or not

Speaker: he is at fault for that.

Speaker: Don't worry, there may be a
reason why the author chose not to
mention that as

Speaker: well.

Speaker: I'm gonna get there.

Speaker: Another thing that I was
thinking about before I explain my
theory as to why that

Speaker: author chose to leave out
certain things is what's up with
this woman, this spirit shaking

Speaker: the vine?

Speaker: Like these people are on
the porch for a while, they're
talking, they make some comment

Speaker: about the house.

Speaker: She doesn't shake the vine
when they make the comment.

Speaker: She waits until a little
later to shake the vine.

Speaker: So did it take all of her
like spectral energy in order to
shake that vine

Speaker: and they just happen to be
at the right place at the right
time?

Speaker: She's been able to shake
that vine around the same time on
other days so you

Speaker: can't tell me it's taken
like five or six years for her to
get up the

Speaker: energy to figure out how to
shake a vine.

Speaker: I don't know.

Speaker: Why shake the vine
violently?

Speaker: Does she want people to
know that she's there?

Speaker: Don't ignore me.

Speaker: I mean it's not like she's
taking that vine and then smashing
it into the house.

Speaker: She's not forcing the vine
to grow more.

Speaker: I felt like the vine would
trap them in the house but no she
just shakes

Speaker: it violently and maybe
she's shaking it violently because
this is her way of saying pay

Speaker: attention to me.

Speaker: Pay attention to me.

Speaker: And so what's the author
trying to tell us?

Speaker: Well maybe the author is
trying to tell us that we need to
take care of

Speaker: our neighbors, right?

Speaker: We need to pay attention.

Speaker: People in the community
pretty much ignored her and her
family because they thought the guy

Speaker: was mean and they're just
like whatever he's a jerk we don't
want to talk to

Speaker: him that he's not really
gonna talk to us and so we know that
she's not

Speaker: around.

Speaker: Somebody will ask like oh
haven't seen her around maybe she
used to go do the

Speaker: shopping or something like
that.

Speaker: Keep in mind that they're
pretty isolated.

Speaker: He's got the farm that
pretty much provides them with
everything they need but you've got

Speaker: to expect in 1905 there
must have been a few things that
they needed from the

Speaker: store.

Speaker: So we're assuming oh no the
story takes place in 1886.

Speaker: Okay so there's gotta be a
few things that they don't have on
the farm that

Speaker: she's gonna have to go out
and get.

Speaker: Now we could say that maybe
because of her missing foot and
because he's mean maybe

Speaker: she didn't go out very
often and so the sister-in-law is
the one who

Speaker: goes out and gets things.

Speaker: Though the fact that people
have asked him where's your wife and
he responds with she's

Speaker: at her parents and responds
in a manner where people feel they
cannot ask more or

Speaker: should not ask more.

Speaker: That tells me that people
knew of her existence and she had
some goings out within

Speaker: the community.

Speaker: So though people know about
her, though people know he's mean,
she's gone for two years

Speaker: before he leaves.

Speaker: So that means for two years
nobody in this community pressed the
issue of where's your

Speaker: wife.

Speaker: No one in this community
thought no maybe we should reach out
to her family in

Speaker: Iowa.

Speaker: No one in this community
did they not bother to ask about the
kids.

Speaker: Speaking of the kids, how
old were these kids?

Speaker: Because if they were really
young then I could see them not
being able to mention

Speaker: to anybody mom is missing.

Speaker: However they if they are
really young then they would be
crying and asking about mom.

Speaker: That would just be a given.

Speaker: Yes you've got the aunt
there to help sue them but at some
point you would

Speaker: think somebody would notice
a crying kid even though it's a
rural community.

Speaker: Keep in mind we've got two
years in which this woman no one's
making any advances

Speaker: on figuring out hey where
where is she?

Speaker: No one thinks this is very
strange they just kind of whatever
we're just going to

Speaker: ignore people turn a blind
eye.

Speaker: With the children so this
story comes out in 1905 right and in
1905 the state

Speaker: of Missouri adopts into law
that children have to either receive
education in a school or

Speaker: they must they they have
the right to receive an education
right so if the child

Speaker: is working on the farm then
the family has to prove that the
child is working

Speaker: on the farm.

Speaker: Okay so even though the
story takes place in 1886 I do find
it an interesting

Speaker: coincidence that the story
about a woman who has gone missing
because her community decided to

Speaker: turn a blind eye turn a
blind eye turn the other cheek turn
the other cheek

Speaker: and just not pay attention
not dig any further happens to be
the same year that

Speaker: kids have to receive some
sort of education and be accounted
for.

Speaker: Why is this significant?

Speaker: Well if the kids are of
school age which I'm assuming they
are not absolute babies

Speaker: because otherwise those
babies would definitely be causing a
fuss for their mama and we might

Speaker: see some reports of the
sister-in-law walking around one of
the kids but all

Speaker: we have a report of is her
with the man okay so with that being
said

Speaker: the kids if the kids were
of school age and had been in school
then they

Speaker: would have mentioned at
school at some point I miss mama or
mama's asleep I want

Speaker: my mama something would
have been said because that's what
kids do even if they felt

Speaker: that you know dad might hit
them or beat them or something with
children it's very

Speaker: hard for them to keep a
secret of that nature for so long
for two years

Speaker: so if they had been in
school then this woman's
disappearance probably would have
been investigated

Speaker: a lot sooner okay so that
is my theory as to why the author
chose not

Speaker: to go into what happened to
her foot is the sister a willing
participant in this

Speaker: extramarital affair and why
he up and moved all of a sudden my
theory is that

Speaker: the author doesn't really
want us to pay attention to that
stuff the author really only

Speaker: wants us to focus on the
fact that the town ignored this
woman and she disappeared

Speaker: okay so that's my theory
anyway I would also add that I think
it's kind of

Speaker: funny that the author
mentions the little knots of wood
turning the roots kind of turning

Speaker: in on itself and then
forming at the breast and I'm like
she has boobies this

Speaker: this dead this root this
root of the tree trunk this has
boobies I think that's

Speaker: really funny that the
author put that but it's written by
a guy so there you

Speaker: go maybe he thought it was
funny too all right so what else can
we say

Speaker: about this story yes we
definitely have I certainly have a
lot of questions but in

Speaker: terms of achieving its goal
which is to have us think about our
own relationships within

Speaker: our communities and how we
interact in our communities I think
it does a really good

Speaker: job and it's interesting
because the writer says and I quote
the moral code of rural

Speaker: Missouri is stern and
exacting so I feel like this is the
writer's way of saying

Speaker: hey moral code of Missouri
you may have thought it was polite
not to get involved

Speaker: in your neighbors affairs
but as a result of your not getting
involved a woman wind

Speaker: up dead and buried I mean
this town no town wants to have a
home in

Speaker: the community that is
abandoned and has an evil reputation
and is just a negative site

Speaker: this kind of brings down
the whole community brings down the
whole town so it's not

Speaker: like these people were
asking for it so in a way we can say
the author

Speaker: is letting us know that
when you turn a blind eye when you
turn the other

Speaker: cheek when you ignore a
problem in your community it will
dig deep it will fester

Speaker: it will grow and it will
take hold like a root it will not go
away

Speaker: and you will always be
reminded of that thing that you
could have done something about

Speaker: or should have done
something about I think it's kind of
funny that it ends with

Speaker: and that vine is just as
polite and nice so basically this
woman it gets to

Speaker: keep her home she gets to
stay right there and she was
probably very kind and

Speaker: polite and nice towards
others in and of itself now one
thing I had to look

Speaker: up was whippoorwill because
I was like what on earth is that and
it's a little

Speaker: bird so there you have it
if you were like what did you say at
the

Speaker: end whippoorwill is a
little bird so you can hear the kids
like crickets and then

Speaker: these little birds in
southern Missouri I hope you enjoyed
this story and do come back