Subscribe
Share
Share
Embed
Increase your odds of being drawn, and of having a successful hunt by better understanding BC’s Limited Entry Hunting in this LEH masterclass.
Travis Bader is joined by BC’s Data Licensing Unit Head Sarah McKinnon, and Policy and Regulation Analyst Stephen MacIver as they delve into the inner workings of BC’s LEH and answer questions posed by Silvercore Club members.
British Columbia is unique in its massive biodiversity and recognizes the need to involve the public and interested stakeholders in effective management. There will always be contrary opinions on best practices, but one underlying sentiment that shines through in this episode is the level of care that all parties have in the sustainable management of wildlife.
______
Silvercore Club - https://bit.ly/2RiREb4
Online Training - https://bit.ly/3nJKx7U
Other Training & Services - https://bit.ly/3vw6kSU
Merchandise - https://bit.ly/3ecyvk9
Blog Page - https://bit.ly/3nEHs8W
Host Instagram - @Bader.Trav https://www.instagram.com/bader.trav
Silvercore Instagram - @SilvercoreOutdoors https://www.instagram.com/silvercoreoutdoors
____
The Silvercore Podcast explores the mindset and skills that build capable people. Host Travis Bader speaks with hunters, adventurers, soldiers, athletes, craftsmen, and founders about competence, integrity, and the pursuit of mastery, in the wild and in daily life. Hit follow and step into conversations that sharpen your edge.
Kind: captions
Language: en-GB
I'm Travis Bader.
And this is the Silvercore Podcast.
Silvercore has been providing its members
with a skills and knowledge necessary
to be confident and proficient in the
outdoors for over 20 years, and we
make it easier for people to deepen
their connection to the natural world.
If you enjoy the positive and
educational content we provide, please
let others know by sharing commenting,
and following so that you can join in on
everything that Silvercore stands for.
If you'd like to learn more
about becoming a member of the
Silvercore Club and community,
visit our website at Silvercore.ca
Today, I am joined by Sarah McKinnon,
who is the data licensing unit head
for the province of British Columbia
and Steven McKeever, the provincial
policy and regulation analyst, and in
this episode of the Silvercore Podcast,
we're going to attempt to delve into
all aspects of limited entry hunting
in British Columbia, Sarah, Stephen,
welcome to the Silvercore Podcast.
Thanks.
You know, I find that so
often when people call up of a
government, they overlook the fact.
They're not that they're not just
talking to some faceless entity,
rather they're talking to their friends
or neighbors or their associates.
And to that end, I'd like to be
able to provide the audience with an
opportunity to get to know a little bit
more about you, like a little bit about
your background and how you came to be
in the role that you currently have.
And Sarah, maybe I'll put
you in the hot seat first.
Oh boy.
I don't know where, uh, what you're
looking for, but, um, you know, I I'm
from BC, uh, born and raised in BC
and, uh, went to university, uh, got a
degree in math and statistics and, um,
and joined the branch, the wildlife and
habitat branch in, um, 2011, I believe.
Uh, um, Yeah, yeah.
Analyzing data, working on the system
that we use to issue licenses and, uh,
Leh applications and authorizations.
Yeah.
And, you know, you're, you're
very involved in all of that.
I think the first time we met was
up, uh, somewhere in Northern BC
at a, at a, at a wildlife event.
That was a what, four
or five years ago now.
Yeah,
that sounds about right.
Yeah.
And how about you, Steven, your background
and how you got into your current role?
Um, I was born and raised in Kamloops,
spent most of my, uh, childhood there.
And, uh, at the age of 18, I kind of
went into the Bush and I didn't come out
for about 15 or 20 years tree planting,
forestry, wildlife work, things like that.
Uh, Got a degree from the university
college of the caribou it's Thompson
rivers university now, and that natural
resource science program started
with the wildlife branch in 2007.
And so been there about 15 years now.
Wow.
So Leh limited entry hunting, NBC.
It's something that seems to be
wrought with, uh, misinformation,
different ideas, different concepts.
And I'm not entirely sure why, because
the provincial government does a pretty
good job of putting out information
online and within the Leh synopsis.
And I'll have a link to your online
resources in the show notes and on,
uh, in the YouTube description as well.
But you know, some areas that
I think would be interesting
for us to start was, would be.
Uh, how did Leh kind of come about and BC,
uh, or maybe a little bit of the history
of Leh from, from your understanding?
Yeah.
Uh, funny, I was talking to
some colleagues about this the
other day, actually, an Leh was
originally put in place as a, as
a method to distribute hunters.
Um, it's good to have people
not concentrated in one place,
hunting a specific species.
I mean, if everybody goes to
the, that place, that's the
hot spot that's close to town.
I mean, it doesn't take long for
the populations there to, to become,
you know, decreased and stuff.
But it's a really important, we
want people to get out broadly.
We want hunters to be in the back
country in the front country.
We want distribution of hunters.
And Leh was originally used as a tool
to distribute people, to kind of force
people to go into newer places or
go drive maybe a little bit farther
to get to their hunting grounds.
Uh, it has evolved since then.
I think the first Leh
draws were in the eighties.
Something like that four comes
to mind, but I'm not sure.
Um, it has evolved.
I mean, now for the most part, and
I'd say over the last, since I've
been around anyways 15 years, Leh
is more about supply and demand.
If the demand for a specific species
of wildlife exceeds the supply.
More moose hunters out there,
then the resource can sustain.
There has to be a way to
control the number of hunters.
You know, our, our, our first priority
as a wildlife branch is conservation.
And anything else comes after that.
Right?
So that, that's, that's the first thing
we, we turn our minds to when, when
looking at regulations, when looking
at, you know, Leh, whether it's an
appropriate tool and things like that.
Um, but it's, it's now I would say
the vast majority of Leh funds in
the province are about supply and
demand where the resource just can't
sustain the general open season.
Right.
Well, how was that determined?
I mean, uh, is there a group of
scientists that will go out and, uh,
Is there consultation with, uh, uh,
local groups to, to determine what
the current supply is looking like.
And, uh, and then the demand, I
guess, with Leh in place is going to
be simple to figure out because if
it's an Leh only area, the demand is
going to be self-evident and someone
like Sarah can look at those numbers
and figure that out pretty quick.
Um, how do, how is that supply
and demand kind of figured.
Species-specific there's different
ways to do it for different
species, but the overall formula
is, uh, a population estimate.
You know, what starts with a population
estimate of biologist in a, in a, in an
aircraft flying around counting animals.
And then there's a lot of
science behind that too.
And, you know, wildlife inventory,
there are standards that biologists
have to use when they're doing these
inventories and they have things like
site, correct stability factors where,
you know, you know, you're not going to
see every single moose on the landscape.
And depending on the conditions in
the snow and the weather and the fog
and whatever the conditions might
be, you can actually say, you know,
under these conditions we saw 70
moose and our correction factor.
There's probably closer to a
hundred, that kind of thing.
So all of it starts with
a population estimate.
And then largely thanks to our
neighbors, to the south, who, who
spend a lot of money researching,
you know, wildlife and sustainable
harvest limits and things like that.
We have a pretty good idea of what
the maximum sustainable harvest
rate can be on a population.
When I say sustainable, I mean,
hunting won't have a negative
impact on the numbers, on the
number of animals out there.
And it varies from species to species.
And then, and it'll also
vary depending on habitats.
You know, it's not one blanket thing
across the, across the province, but
through some species like mountain
goat, we use a 3% harvest rate for
populations over a hundred, I believe.
So.
You know, if you see there's a hundred
mountain goats on a, on a hill, the
sustainable harvest rate that we have.
Management plan is 3%.
So three mountain goat can be taken.
If this isn't an area that's close to
town and there's roads that access it.
And we know that if it's a general open
season, there's going to be 50 hunters
going up there, hunting mountain goat.
It's probably going to result in an
unsustainable harvest that herd will,
you know, the population will decline,
especially if nannies are taken.
Um, so that's an example of where we'd
say, okay, we need to limit the number of
hunters hunting that mountain cold Turkey.
We'll put it on the entry hunting and
we'll give out a number of authorizations
to try and hit that 3% number
when issuing that let's say the 3% number.
So if we had a hundred mountain goats
and we're going to now issue three Leh
permits to harvest those three goats.
Is the actual efficacy of the
harvest taking into consideration.
Let's say those three go out
and all three were unsuccessful.
Is that, is that part of
the calculation process?
Like, is there a, uh, uh, an estimated
success rate, like, would you then
issue five or, uh, would you just
hedge your bets and say, Nope.
Three is where it's at.
It's exactly how we do it.
And it can be tricky when we have a new
Leh hunt and we don't have that success
rate, that historical harvest rate
mountain goats, a good example to use
because they're on compulsory inspection.
We have a pretty good idea how many
mountain goats are out there being,
being filled by know, licensed hunters.
So, um, we do look at
the six success rates.
Generally, you will use the last three
or five years in an average of that,
you know, any, anything past there.
We're probably getting a success rate
that doesn't represent real life today.
You know, there may be new roads in there.
The cost of gas might be down.
The habitat might have changed.
You know, there's all sorts of
factors that change over time.
So we'll use the last three to five
years depending on the species and
get an average success rate each year.
If, I mean, if in the last five
years there has been 20 Leh
authorizations issued for that
particular mountain goat hunt.
Our compulsory inspection data
set shows us that 10 mountain
goats have been harvested.
We have a 50% success rate.
So we will use that when we
factor calculate the next number
of authorizations available,
we want three goats hunted.
We have a 50% success rates.
Generally we'll give out six
authorizations for that there's
exceptions to every rule, but that
is the general formula that we use.
Um, there's issues when we have new homes.
And, you know, we don't
have that historical kind of
harvest data to go off of.
There's a few things we can do there.
We can look at adjacent areas.
Maybe there's an Leh in an area
that's close to there with similar
kind of environmental conditions
and access and stuff like that.
And kind of infer from
those success rates.
And we also have a minimum success
rate, you know, if there's been 20
authorizations given out in the last year
and we have had one goat harvested, I
mean, in, in, and we want 10 per year,
there's a point where the success rates.
So low times it by the number
of animals that you want to get
killed, we'd be given out hundreds
and hundreds of authorizations.
We can't do, we are limited through
the wildlife act regulations with the
number of authorizations we can issue.
It's a, it's a real range.
Yeah, generally.
So every single Leh, Hans
has a minimum and a maximum.
Set by cabinet that, that we can, or
set by the minister that we can issue.
And we can't, we can't go outside.
Usually they start at one, not always.
And they range up to some, some
species like goat, for example, you
know, maybe it's one to five or one
to 10, and then we've got some hunts
for deer and agricultural zones.
They can go up to 5, 600, 1500, I think
we've had in the past kind of thing.
Right.
So, you know, a person
they get into hunting.
They've got there, they've gone
through their, uh, safety training.
They've done their safety testing.
They've got their fish and wildlife.
They go out and buy their tags and
they want to hunt in a certain area
only to learn, Hey, this is going
to be an Leh hunt, limited entry.
So I'm going to have
to make an application.
Um, we've got three different types,
I guess you can apply individually.
You can apply as a shared hunt
or you can apply as a group hunt.
Uh, would you guys be able to kind
of break that down for the audience,
kind of what that process looks like?
Sure.
Do you want me to tackle that one, Steve?
Yeah.
Okay.
That one
to
me, um, any hunter can
apply for a individual hunt.
Um, all Leh applications are available
for individual hunting and it is,
uh, just as it sounds, you apply
on your own and you hope to win an
authorization, uh, for moose and bison.
I believe those are the two ones.
Is that correct?
Steve, just moose and bison
for shared hunts, though.
If you apply for a moose and bison,
you can apply as a shared group.
And what that means is a
group of individuals up to
four can apply to receive.
Each of them would receive
authorizations, but there's a group limit.
And the goal is that a group of three
or four people, uh, could be authorized
to harvest two animals and a group of
two or a two, two individuals could
go out hunting together each with an
authorization, but together they're
only allowed to harvest one animal.
So that's a shared hunt application,
only available for most invasin.
And basically it allows everybody
to go out hunting together, but
not everybody to harvest an animal.
The other kind of applications are group
applications for the other species.
Um, and that is where a group of
hunters up to four, again, want
to go out hunting together, but in
this case they would each receive an
authorization to harvest an animal.
So all four individuals
could harvest an animal.
Um, so, uh, if a hunt only has an, an Leh
hunt only has two authorizations available
and a group of four people apply, they
cannot win because there are not for
authorizations available for that animal.
Right.
So what would be the advantage
of going in on a group hunt?
Would it increase your
odds of being drawn?
So one person on that
group ends up getting.
Drawn the rest of the
group kind of tags along.
It does not in the group.
Applications does not increase
your odds of being drawn.
The group goes into the
draw as one application.
The benefit is that you get to go
out with your group of friends,
um, and you all get to go together.
You don't want to go hunting
alone in this area, perhaps.
And so the benefit is you get to all go
together and you all get to hunt together.
Um, a shared application on the other hand
does increase each person's odds because
each application goes in on its own.
Um, not as just one group, but
as each individual application.
So yes, if you're a friend, uh, Comes
up on the list first and they get
drawn, then the entire group will win.
And so even if you're, you know,
number 180,000, um, in the list,
uh, but your friend got drawn,
you'll also win an authorization.
But again, um, the number of
animals available to harvest
is, is not one per hunter.
Right?
Okay.
So, uh, last season I did my
very first fly-in hunt and went
up to the spats CZ plateau.
And uh, was doing a caribou hunt.
Didn't see a caribou the entire
time still had a fantastic time, was
there with my wife and my son and
man, just what a great experience.
There was one other group
that was up there as well.
And they had a shared hunt for moose, and
there was a bit of commotion and concern
because when they got up there, they
realized in all of their packing and all
of this stuff that they brought up, they
forgot to bring some paperwork that's
required for a shared hunt that isn't
necessarily required for a group hunt.
Luckily, they're able to.
Make contact with one individual
and their group hadn't flown in yet.
And he was able to, uh, work to
get the paperwork they needed and
they got it all flown in there.
So it worked out, it just
put them back for a few days.
But are you able to talk a little bit
about the difference of what's required
for a Sherratt hunt, as opposed to
let's say an individual or group on,
uh, yeah, for sure.
So, um, for individual and group hunts,
uh, a hunter actually doesn't have to
carry their Leh authorization with them.
Um, uh, but they do of course
need their species license.
Uh, but because the.
Each individual is allowed
to harvest one animal.
Um, there's no concern of over
harvest with the shared hunts because
a group of four, for example, is
allowed to harvest only two animals.
Uh, it's really important that
they know if an animal has been
harvested and they've reached their
maximum of two, that they can't
continue hunting for that species.
Um, so that's, uh, why as your, uh, as
your, uh, story, um, alluded to there,
the importance of having a harvest record.
Basically the requirement is that if you
have a shared authorization with a group
of hunters immediately upon killing an
animal, you must communicate that to
the other hunters in your shared group.
And each of them must write on their
harvest record, uh, where, and when
that, uh, kill occurred so that we
can make sure that if a shared group
before kills two animals, that no
more, uh, get killed after that.
Okay.
Good information.
Now, you know, I guess a little, you
know, I'm going to save this other,
uh, this tag question to the end, cause
I don't want to take us off the, uh,
off the track that we're currently on.
Um, can you apply for
multiples of a single species?
Nope.
One application per person per space.
Only one exception to that rule.
There we go.
Steve, go ahead.
If somebody applies for a
sheep in the Skeena region, we
have an earlier draw for that.
It's the spring draw.
If they're unsuccessful in that early
scheme as sheep draw, they can then
apply for his sheep somewhere else.
Okay.
If in the early sheep draw, then
they can apply for another one.
And that makes sense.
What about a, high-tech?
Why isn't there some special,
wow.
It's part of the early draw
because there's a, there's,
there's a spring season there,
but there's also a fall season.
Um, so there's no, there's no second
draw for high to quiet Blackberry.
There's no, you know, we've got
our spring draw that's earlier
in our fall draw, which is coming
up in early June kind of thing.
Um, yeah, for Heidegger wide
Blackberry there's there's.
One application opportunity.
That's it.
Okay.
And then for, let's say dear provincial
bag limit, uh, does Haida Gwaii kind of
count outside that I know it's going a
little outside of Leh as, as this one,
but fake limits are in independent, so
I'm not sure I understand the question.
Uh, so for the province of BC, uh, how
many deer could you take in a year?
Uh,
three, unless you're on high
to Guam, then you can take 15.
Okay.
So that, that was just one of the
points that a little bit outside
of Leh, but figured it might be.
Elliot's story.
Um, you know, that, that,
that, that regulation change.
It wasn't contentious.
I won't get into that, but, uh, sure.
Prior to the black bear on Heidegger,
I going on to Leh, we had our harvest
data suggested, you know, four to 10,
maybe six, you know, not a whole bunch
of black bears being harvested, uh, by
resident hunters, um, annually, the number
was quite low, not a lot of interest.
I mean, our, our harvest data, isn't,
isn't a hundred percent accurate.
We'll never claim that it is, but
you know, when we've got years and
years of data that suggests that the
harvest is lower than 10, you know,
there's probably something to it.
Maybe it's a bit higher, but,
uh, you know, not a whole bunch.
And so not a whole bunch of interest in
hunting blackberries on high to acquire.
Then we went to Leh.
And how many applications do
we yet for people to hunt on
high-tech wine for black bear?
Now it's two.
Nope, just that kind of people want
things that are, that are rare or
harder to get or whatever it is.
The interest in hunting in black
bears on the hideaway skyrocketed once
it went to Leh and there's probably
all kinds of reasons for it, but
isn't that funny, you know,
everybody wants what they can have.
It seems to be right.
Kind of
thing.
And they also probably look at
it along the lines of I've always
wanted to go hunting there.
Now, the only way that I can is if I go
through Leh, so I better start applying
now just for that kind of, you know, once
in a lifetime or that dream opportunity
that I've, that I've always wanted to do,
but you know, it, once it went on Leh,
it seems like the interest in hunting
there just increase that amazingly
interesting just from my human
psychological perspective.
Yeah.
And I wonder if that's something
that, that you guys have
seen born out in other areas.
Like if that's part of the planning
process, if you say, okay, this
area is now going to Leh or making
a change to Leh, it's like sticking
your finger in the bowl of water
and not expecting to see ripples.
And some of those ripples can be
positive and some of those poles
can have some very unintended
consequences.
Yeah.
And it, honestly, it's not something
that I would, uh, that we would turn
our minds to, you know, we'll go to
Leh somewhere and then more people
may be interested in hunting there.
Um, now I'm curious myself.
And so while whilst Sarah probably answers
the next question, I'm gonna actually
find that, that, that exact number.
Fair enough.
Um, so, so Sarah, I see
that there's Leh for Turkey.
Now, do you know if there's any
thoughts of any future additions to Leh?
I probably have to answer that one too.
You better answer that, Steve?
I don't know.
Yeah.
Um, I mean, I wouldn't pre predetermined
what kind of proposals or decisions
are going to be made in the future?
We are proposing this year, a
December private land general open
season Turkey hunt in the Coutnies.
Um, we've got that posted online
as one of the, one of the, one of
our regulation change proposals.
Um, I mean, maybe it's, it's impossible
to say we do have Leh for Turkey.
I think that's a December season as well.
Um, again, it's supply and demand.
You know, if we find that that, that
there are conservation concerns or
sustainability concerns with Turkey
hunting, then we would think about it.
But from what I understand, talking
to the regional bio or a biologist
and stuff, you know, there's, there's
no conservation concerns for Turkey
and the Coutnies that I'm aware of.
Is that essentially how the
conservation concerns would be relayed
through the regional biologists?
Or are there groups that would
come up and just say, Hey, look
at, we're really concerned about
the population in this area.
Are there other, uh, third parties or
individuals that raise these concerns?
It's like the roots of a tree.
I mean, they come from all over the
place we hear, we hear about, I'm
not just going to say conservation
concerns, cause it goes both ways.
We get information on wildlife
from first nations, stakeholders
guide, Outfitters, ranchers.
I mean, anybody in the public,
you know, nature clubs, uh,
non-government organizations.
We hear about wildlife information
from the public all the time.
And you know, that that, that can help
wildlife biologists and setting what
their priorities might be for studying
and the, in the, in the coming years.
Yeah, that's, that's happened quite
a few times where we hear from
multiple sources that, you know,
there's a, there's a concern about a
specific species in a specific area.
And so we may allocate some money in
some time to go and fly and do a bit
of, uh, studying of that, of that
particular population, their situation.
That makes sense.
Yeah.
Well, this might be a SIRA question.
Sarah, can you provide some further
details on the weighting of the odds?
Let's say against somebody that
has already been drawn, like for
example, would a person be in the
proverbial penalty box for three
years after a successful moose straw
after which time their odds reset?
Yep.
That's exactly how it works.
Yup.
That's exactly how it works.
So I think the odds, uh, came in
in 1993, from what I recall, um,
uh, From complaints or, or really
just increase in applications.
And so, uh, individuals having
less of a chance of winning.
Um, and so odds were implemented
to try and help people who hadn't
won before, have a better chance.
Um, and so that's exactly
right for, uh, moose and elk.
It is it's three years, but if you
have one, an authorization and the last
three years, uh, your odds are reduced
by 66%, um, in, in the current draw.
And then three years later, if you
still have not won anything for three
years, then your odds go back to,
um, uh, no penalty basically against,
uh, against your application and for,
uh, Other species in the province.
It's just one year back,
a 50% reduction in odds
just for one year, just for one year.
So my understanding, okay.
And my understanding of how that works
is essentially everyone who applies is
given a random number in those numbers
are put out onto a giant spreadsheet.
And based on the lower, their number
is these spreadsheets that starts
going through 1, 2, 3, 4, but if
you've been drawn, every, let's say
a third entry of a drawn person will
now no longer be eligible to be drawn.
So you're basically just
going down the list.
And if you are a number
of happened to be on the.
Three and one, two and three have
all been drawn ups three you're out.
Is that basically how it
works out for the 50%?
It's every second person.
That's
exactly how it works per species.
And of course it's not on a spreadsheet,
it's all done by the computer now.
So it's, it's all been coded.
Uh, we don't use a spreadsheet anymore.
Um, so it's been coded into
the, into the computer system.
Um, and by species that's
exactly what happens.
It goes through, uh, issues,
authorizations to each individual.
And, uh, if it reaches a person who has,
um, reduced odds and it's a 50% reduction.
Skips that person moves on to the next.
And then when it finds somebody,
the next person with reduced odds,
it grants them an authorization.
And then the next person with reduced
dogs comes along and it skips them and
on and on and on, um, uh, 50% or every
second application that has reduced odds.
Is there ever sort of
the opposite approach?
Yeah, it does make sense.
Is there ever an opposite approach, uh,
looked at, whereas let's say somebody is
a brand new hunter or maybe to encourage
youth hunting or, um, that they have
increased odds or is it just, we just
take those who've been drawn before and
they're there in the proverbial penalty.
Uh, we have definitely looked
at other jurisdictions.
Um, and what other jurisdictions do?
There are several different ways of,
uh, reducing odds, trying to make
sure that the draw is random yet.
Uh, people have a fair chance of
getting drawn and some provinces,
uh, I know have a system where
over time your odds increase.
So, you know, if you've been applying
for 10 years and you've never won.
Uh, your odds start going up so
that you, you actually get a chance,
um, that doesn't work so well in
BC because we have so many hunters.
And so that method, um, discourages new
hunters from applying because they know,
oh, my odds are so low as a new hunter.
Um, because I'm not given that incentive
until after 10 years of applying.
Um, uh, we don't have a system where,
uh, new hunters have a better chance.
Um, like you mentioned Travis,
uh, maybe, you know, to increase
recruitment, um, because of course that
then penalizes the other people who
have been applying for a long time.
So there's, there's pros and cons.
You know, unfortunately it's
also just luck of the draw.
So some people get annoyed, you know,
I haven't one for so many years, but,
uh, I keep applying for the loan to
well, and he mentioned, uh,
like new hunter recruitment.
And I know within conservation
organizations, new hunter recruitment
and hunter retention are our big things.
And throughout north America,
they're looking at different models
to, uh, bring more into the fold.
Is that something that the province
looks at as well as a, um, uh, as a
priority within the wildlife area,
uh, to answer that.
We did have a, a hunter recruitment
and retention strategy back in
around 2000, let's say 2008 to 2009.
Something like that.
Um, the number of hunters was low.
I believe it went down to about 84,000
and we had a goal of, you know, getting
up to a hundred thousand hunters by 2000.
And so somewhere between 2010 to
2020, I can't remember what the exact
date was, but, but we did get there.
Um, we ended up now we have over a hundred
thousand hunters in the province and I'm
not aware of any government initiative or
program right now to recruit more hunters
into the, into the activity sports.
Um, No, there's no real pressing
pressing thing at the moment
for recruitment or retention.
So Sarah, when you're talking about, and
I've heard, I heard of, I hear it a lot.
I put in every single
year, I never get drawn.
What's going on.
Right?
It's it's rigged.
It's against me.
There's there's gotta
be something wrong here.
Uh, do you have advice for people
like that who never get drawn,
uh, to perhaps increase their
odds in some way, shape or form?
Uh, well, it's really about, uh,
the odds in terms of how many
authorizations are available and
how many applications we receive.
So of course, uh, we can't tell you
in advance of the draw, how many
applications we're going to get.
Um, but we do publish
the previous year's odds.
And so that's a good indication if this
is a popular area and there's always
many, many hunters who apply and there's.
One tentative authorization that
it's going to be really hard
to get that one authorization.
Um, so, so that's really, the only advice
I can give is just, um, look at the odds.
Uh, if it's, uh, a hunt that was
opened last year and, uh, thousands
of people applied for that one
authorizations that it's likely going
to be the same scenario and it's going
to be hard to get an authorization.
Um, of course that's often, uh, in, in
areas that are more easily accessible.
Um, so you might have to travel a bit
farther, but just checking out those odds
and you guys make that readily apparent,
and I've always questioned myself.
Why don't people do that?
These people who are complaining,
why don't they just look at
the eyes and make a commitment?
Okay, I'm going to travel,
but I've got way better odds.
If I go out to this one area, Then, if I
try to do it within, let's say close to
the lower mainland, I, uh, looking at the
odds that that was the only one that I
know of.
Yeah.
Yeah, no, it's very true.
It's just of course making the commitment
to, to do that travel and the extra
time and coordination and planning,
um, I think is really the, the big,
uh, drawback, I guess, but then you
get out in the middle of nowhere with
nobody else, so you can enjoy it.
That's not a drawback to me personally.
I don't mind trying to set
aside a little bit of time, you
know, there's another aspect to that too.
Right?
You can't just look at limited entry,
hunting in isolation without looking at
the other hunting opportunities and VC.
I mean, so you didn't get
nearly H draw compared to almost
everywhere else in north America.
I mean, you're still gonna have a
chance to hunt something close to home.
Um, yeah, you can't, you can't
look at Leh and isolation.
I don't know how else to describe
it, but there's still going
to be ongoing opportunity.
If you don't get your early HDR, you still
got a chance to make some plans and get
out in the woods with your friends and
your family and have those experiences.
Yeah, we're, we're definitely
blessed in that regard.
You know, I had a podcast
recently, a fellow out of Idaho.
It seems Brad Brooks, he's got
a company called our galley and
he's got a media company as well,
puts out some really good content.
And, uh, he was saying, you
know, you guys are so blessed.
Like you've got a general
open season for sheep.
I mean, we, we just don't have that.
How do you have that?
I did a float hunt this last season.
I wasn't successful, but I was successful
in having a heck of a lot of fun.
And I took a whitewater raft on the
Fraser river for a week and checked
out some pretty interesting areas.
But you're right there.
We are pretty lucky to have these
opportunities that lie within and
outside of the limited entry hunting.
Yeah.
One of the things he brought
up though was, uh, as an
American, um, what are the rules?
What are the rules for me to be
able to come in and, and do a
hunt in, in BC as a non-resident?
Can he do an Leh?
And does he need a guide if he does that?
There's a couple of ways.
Sarah, do you want me to
go ahead Steve, to do
that one non-residents
can't apply for Leh.
Leh is only available to resident hunters,
and you have to prove your residency
through your hunter, three-year fish
and wildlife ID and all that stuff.
Uh, there's specific to big game.
There's two ways that a non-resident
can hunt big game in BC.
One is to hire the services of
a licensed guide Outfitters.
And the other one is to get the
resident of BPC BC to apply for
a permit to accompany for them.
Those are the only ways
that a non-resident can hunt
big game in the province.
So a permit to accompany is that, uh,
sorta done by lottery as well, or is
that a, you pay your fee and you're good.
That's the
discretion of the regional manager,
wherever it, whoever that might
be there's nine different regions,
but I think there's eight different
regional managers and they will review
the permit to company applications.
And if somebody wants a permit to
hunt moose in an area where moose
hunting is extremely important
and popular to resident hunters,
they're probably not going to get it.
Um, you know, whereas if somebody
wants a permit to a company to hunt
white tail deer somewhere they're
abundant, they reproduce quickly.
There's really no concerns in
most of the province about them.
You know, they'll
probably going to get it.
Permit to accompany is
more likely to be approved.
If the interest in resident hunting
for that species in that area is lower.
If there's high interest for
resident hunters, it's less likely
that the permit to company will be
approved.
That makes sense.
Yeah.
And
just to add to that again, for me at
the discretion of the regional manager
and permit to accompany our, not
for limited entry hunting, it's just
for general open season hunting.
Good point.
Good point.
So here's another question I hear.
I put in every single year I pay my money.
What's that money going towards
Steve?
I'm going to look in the wildlife act.
So the wildlife act is the, is the
legislation that, um, that that's
most of the hunting related things.
I mean, if anybody on the podcast wants
to just have a look through it, it's.
It, as far as legislation goes,
it's pretty fascinating to read.
Um, you know, especially I like the,
uh, the wildlife act itself and then
the designation exemption regulation,
that's confusing, but you know,
there's lots of good stuff in there.
So I'm just open it up here now.
And, uh, the wildlife act has a list
of the fees and then the S and then
the H the habitat conservation trust
foundation surcharge on top of each one.
So every time somebody buys a license
or a permit under the wildlife act,
a portion of that will go to general
revenue, hospitals, schools, highways,
you know, whatever that might be.
And then a portion will go directly
to the HCPF generally on average,
it's about 25 to 30% of, of the fees
that people pay, go to the H CTF.
And I'm trying to find the list for
Leh licenses, but, um, I need to
go somewhere else to find those.
So you might have to bear with
me or going to the next question.
Yeah.
And we can always throw it
in the notes again after two.
Uh, and that's the, the old trope,
they always say, you know, hunters
support conservation in, sorry.
The application fee is $5 and
then a surcharge of $1 per
Leh application goes to HCPF.
Okay.
So let me just take a look.
I got a few different questions here.
Uh, we talked about the
weighting of the draws.
Um, you know, Stephen, you're mentioning
a boat, looking to her neighbors
sound to the south of book, how they
look at conservation and they've
done some great research on that.
When I look at Washington, I've never
hunted in Washington, but I've been
reading a boat, a mentorship program
that they have there and where state
approved mentors, people who've been
hunting for X period of time, clean
criminal record checks all, all the rest.
They look like a good person to be out
there, mentoring others and showing
them ethical and legal ways to, to
haunted harvest animals are provided
an incentive in following years for
their, uh, limited entry hunting.
Is this something that's ever come up
with, uh, in discussion in BC that you're
aware of?
I have never heard that before.
I didn't know that Washington
had such a program in place.
We have something kind of similar in BC
with the initiation on their license.
I mean, it's hard to get into hunting
without somebody to show you the ropes.
It's not one of those things
that you can just pick up and
be good at and in a week or so.
It takes a lot of time and, and, and
experience and somebody to show you what.
Not always, but that's sure it's helpful.
Um, so we've got the initiation,
the hunting license in
BC that is kind of aimed.
That was part of our hunter
recruitment and retention strategy
actually was that initiation license.
Where if a person isn't sure that they
want to become a hunter, they, they're
not sure that they want to invest the
time and that bit of money to take
the hunter safety training program.
They can get a license still.
They have to be accompanied and supervised
by somebody who meets some qualifications.
Essentially that means that they have
to be accompanied and supervised by an
experienced hunter while they're doing it.
Anything that they kill would come off
the bag limit of that supervising hunter.
I think we sell around a thousand to 1500
energy initiation hunting licenses a year.
I like to think that a lot of those.
Enjoy themselves.
And, you know, then move on to take hunter
safety training and then get their own
hunting license and their own bag limit.
You can only get one initiation
hunting license in a lifetime.
She didn't get your one shot to try
this thing out that maybe you're curious
about, but there we've never talked or
thought or brainstormed how that could
be connected to some sort of Leh system
or preference system that I know of.
Anyways.
Interesting.
Yeah.
I guess the thinking is as a
mentor going out as similar
to the initiates every word.
Yeah.
That's it.
Cause they're, they're losing
their time, but they're gaining.
They're gaining more hunters out there and
people doing it properly, which is when
you say it's hard to get into it is it's
expensive and there's so much information.
Most people will never become
quote unquote experts in it
throughout their lifetime.
They might get really good
in certain areas, but it's,
it's a very broad spectrum.
So to be able to gain that knowledge from
others who are experienced in the field
is I think beneficial to the province
from a, from a monetary perspective,
beneficial to wildlife in the management.
And you know, when hunters talk about
hunter retention recruitment, I think
there's a lot of, there's a lot to be said
for, for having reward systems like that.
Just my two bits.
Um, so, you know, off-air, we're
talking about some funny things as
well, Sarah, but what are some of the,
uh, common or maybe interesting things,
common questions that you receive.
Or interesting things that people
might not necessarily think about when
it comes to a limited entry hunting
or just hunting in general in BC?
Uh, well, uh, I guess I can speak maybe to
the, the applications process in general.
Um, you know, uh, previous to
the current online system where
people can apply online, we had
the paper Leh application cards.
Boy.
I remember those cards coming in in
the bucket fall and we would hire,
you know, six exhilarate staff,
young students, usually to come
in and help process those boxes.
And they were piled high.
Especially in that last week, we would
get, you know, 90,000 paper applications
and every single one of those applications
had to be looked at, make sure we can read
the writing, uh, typed into a computer.
So a.
It was fun, but it was definitely took
a lot of time after the closing date.
It's fun looking back at it
at the time, maybe it wasn't.
So, um, but you know,
the dates, analytically
minded, the closing date would come and
go and we'd still for weeks be sorting
through those paper application cards.
Um, so we get a lot of questions about,
you know, why don't you just run the
draw right away after that closing date.
Um, and, uh, and, and, you know,
previously when it was paper-based
that always took us a while to get
through those paper application
cards, but even often, and, and now,
uh, definitely, um, the applications
are all in and ready to go, but.
The final number of authorizations
still haven't been finalized.
You know, there are, uh, potentially
concerns about the number of
authorizations to be issued and work
still being done on those estimates.
But Steve talked about in terms of harvest
and success rates and the population
estimate and, and sustainable harvest.
So oftentimes we've got everything in
ready to go in the draw and we're waiting
to make sure those numbers are right.
And those numbers get signed off
before we can now push the button
and the system does the draw for us.
But I would say that's one of,
one of our biggest questions.
Why haven't you run the dry yet?
Right.
Okay.
Yeah.
And that's, that was actually going to
be one of my questions, like how was
that draw date determined and it really.
There isn't a set date aside from
making sure we're within the spectrum
before everything happens and we've
got the best possible information
to make the best possible decision.
Is that
that's exactly it.
Yep.
And, and we use the hunter sample survey
that goes out every year, in addition, uh,
to the, the population estimates, um, uh,
and other factors that go into determining
those, those authorization numbers.
So, uh, you know, we're, we're
tabulating the hunter sample survey
data, the results of, of what people
have told us they harvested last
year, um, and hunted for last year.
So it all goes in.
And, and so those are all
pieces of information that
feed into that final decision.
Um, I don't know if you have other
pieces to talk about related to
that steam or, or if that covers of.
Which covers most of it.
I mean, we're bound on one side
with the application deadline,
usually it's the end of may.
And so obviously we're not going
to run the draw prior to the
deadline and then pass then.
I mean, we, we do try to run
the draw as soon as we can.
We understand that people
need to make plans.
You know, some of these are really remote.
People need to book
holidays, all that stuff.
We are always conscious about that.
And we're always trying to
run the draws soon as we can,
but there is a balance to it.
And, uh, you know, there's a, there's
a bit of a tipping point sometime in
mid June, sorry, early June where.
Sarah's wonderful staff
has crunched the numbers.
They've produced the Leh harvest survey
and the hunter survey and all of those
numbers that, that then the biologists
can take a closer look at it and
compare with their inventory numbers
and, and other factors, you know, maybe
there's some people out with concerns.
Maybe there's a new road going into a
place that makes them a little anxious
about giving out too many authorizations.
But there's a balance between running
the draw as soon as possible to give
hunters time to plan and giving wildlife
managers and ultimately the director
of the wildlife branch who signs off
on that, that though on those numbers,
giving that person a high enough level of
comfort that, you know, he or she knows
that they have the most recent complete
data on which to make the decision.
So, you know, if there's a delay, a long
delay, for example, between when the.
Deadline is.
And when the draw happens, it means
that in the background, there is
some piece of information that
we're still trying to figure out.
Some survey results, some results
from an inventory, maybe there's
negotiations happening somewhere in
the province about some topic, you
know, there's, there's, there's going
to be some piece of information.
Once we have that all collected, we run
the draw as soon as possible after that
good information.
Um, so Sarah, we've got like
a first and second choice, uh,
options that we can put on our Leh.
Can you, can you talk a bit
about that and how that works?
Uh, yeah, for sure.
So, uh, the first choice, uh,
hunt code that people put in
it's really, um, their main.
Opportunity to win an authorization.
Um, the S the, uh, the computer system
goes through and looks at that first
choice and awards, uh, people, their first
choice hunt opportunity where possible.
Um, and, and it goes through, as we
talked about, um, with reduced odds,
and then it goes through the list
again, if there are more authorizations
available and grants authorizations to
people, even if they have reduced odds,
um, If there's a third pass, uh, that
the computer does that then looks at,
you know, we have a few authorization
numbers available for this species.
And everybody who asked for this
hunt code on their first choice,
uh, received an authorization.
So now it starts looking
at second choices.
So an individual who applied for something
and didn't get it on their first choice.
Um, if their second choice is a
hunt that was under subscribed.
So not as many applicants as
authorizations available, it
then starts issuing second choice
authorizations, um, to those people.
Uh, we used to have a substitute
hunt, a choice as well, but, um,
that was only for grizzly bear and,
uh, that's no longer available.
Right.
And I don't know if I want to even talk
about that one right now, because that
might be a little bit too hot of a topic.
You know, the second kind of thing.
I mean, the policy intent behind
that, I was mentioning earlier,
we want to distribute hunters.
If a hunter, as Sarah said, is under
subscribed, which means that the
supply actually exceeds the demand.
There's a hundred authorizations available
and only 65 people have applied for them.
Everybody who applied for a
first choice got their hunt.
We still want people to go hunting there.
There's a reason it's under subscribed.
And it's probably because it's remote,
but we still want people to go hunting.
There, there is a sustainable
harvest limit that can be taken
and, and, and we kind of want
that to happen all over the place.
So it's an incentive or an initiative
or a nudge for people to get
into those more remote places.
If somebody applies for a second
choice hunt for airy Roosevelt elk on
Vancouver island, they're never going
to get it because those hunts are
never undersubscribed first choices.
The first is the first
pass in the first past.
Every single authorization for Roosevelt
elk on the island is, is subscribed.
So when you're picking your second
choice hunting, you got to pick those
places that if you want to take that
kind of chance and learn a new place,
explore a bit more of the province.
You have to pick that second choice area
that is chronically under subscribed.
If you want a guaranteed
hunt or, you know, close to
that, one-to-one odds ratio.
Um, but any hunt that is oversubscribed
where there's more applications than
authorizations available, there's
no second choice hunts being issued.
And that makes sense.
Yeah.
Has the promise ever contemplated
partnerships with landowners with
access by Ellie aids for let's say
agricultural or property protection.
Yeah.
Yeah, we've tried it.
I mean, there's one ongoing right
now in Princeton for elk and whoever
gets in the Leh authorization for
an elk in the Princeton area, I
think it's managed me to eight.
I can't remember eight, nine or something
like that, but, um, you know, anybody
who gets an authorization for elk in that
Princeton hunt will get a letter saying,
here's your contact for the landowners
and call it, you know, call this person.
Then they can set you up.
There was a similar program in the
peace region back in 20, 20 12 or so
I think, I can't remember what it was
called and it's really 10 years ago.
Um, but it, it, it, it just fizzled away.
And I believe there was a Kooteny one for
a little while too, and it fizzled away.
So the only one I know of
right now is the Princeton one.
They just don't, they just
don't seem to gain traction.
I don't know.
Hm.
Okay, good.
Interesting.
Um, you know, if I were to let
the ADHD kick in and just kind
of delve off Leh or just a second
here and talk about beg limits.
There's one question that I've
often heard over and over again.
So, so we've got our possession limit
and our bag limit, and I've gotten
different answers from different people
I've spoken to and different provinces
will approach us differently as well.
When does your, so let's say it's,
uh, uh, 10 30 let's as an example,
you're allowed to, let's say migratory
game to 10 and then, uh, for your,
uh, limit for the day and then 30 is
going to be your possession limit.
So let's say you're out in the field
for four days and you take your 10 a
day, 10 a day, 10 a day, fourth day.
You're not taking any because
that would exceed your possession.
When does your possession
limit reset when you get
home?
This is the regulation in the
similar thing is in place for
your quota for fish as well.
Um, the possession limit
regulation is a it's.
It's harder on people that
are hunting farther from home.
That's it?
I mean, if somebody goes on a seven week
hunting expedition and they drive for
24 hours or 10 hours or whatever to get
there, I mean, the, that possession limit
limits their ability to, to get birds or
whatever animal it is into their freezer.
Or as the person who's hunting right
out their backyard, they can have a
hundred piece in their freezer once they
get home, that possession limits reset.
And then they just get that 10 every
day, every day, the same applies to fish,
trout, and salmon and all sorts of stuff.
You know, that that position
limit doesn't count when it
gets into your normal residents.
I believe so.
Your.
You're normal residents.
You know, where, where you put
your address on when you use your,
when you file your income taxes,
you know, that kind of stuff.
It's not your, not your wall tent.
It's not your camp.
It's not your boat, you know, unless you
live in your boat, I guess, but you know,
it's gotta be your normal residence.
Nothing else really applies.
Well, you've answered
that one pretty easily.
Cause I've heard people say,
well, no, you have to consume it.
And I've had authorities say,
no, it's got to be consumed.
I've also heard when you're in your
normal residence or your normal home.
Well,
Travis, if I'm wrong about it, we'll
edit this part out of the podcast.
No problem.
No problem.
I don't think you are right.
I don't think you was.
I've been at this for 15 years
and you know, once you get home,
your possession limits reset.
And I talked to Nova Scotia and
they're like, yep, you get home,
your possession limits reset.
I talked to others, but there's
always going to be some that have
a little bit of eye confusion.
And that's the purpose of this podcast
is to try and bring some normalicy to
the common questions that are coming out.
So we have a, what do they call it?
Normative process.
They have what what's normally done.
People have a common understanding.
Yeah.
Um, well, you know, it's, it's
interesting when we, when we develop the
hunting and trapping synopsis, right?
It's in everybody's best interest that
we use the same wording that is in law.
You know, that way, if, if there's
something that goes awry, you know,
everybody's got the same wording and
the wording and the synopsis should,
for the most part, be the exact
same wording is in the wildlife act.
There's not a lot of leeway
that we have to expand on that.
We don't want this synopsis
to be 200 pages and have like
a layman's version as well.
I mean these kinds of conversations, make
it a bit easier to explain those things.
Oh, totally.
And you know, you put a layman's
explanation and then you bring
that into the courts and you're
going to have some issues.
And I think that's why in the synopsis,
I think synopsis specifically means
like condensed version of on page one.
I think it is at the very bottom.
It says, this is not a legal tax
for a full, proper legal reference,
uh, refer to the regulations.
And that's actually a test question
for, could possibly be a test question
that people need to know about
when, uh, applying for their, um,
uh, getting there with, um, yeah.
You know,
I, I, I might have to backtrack here.
I might have to, uh, I'm just looking
at the definition of possession limits.
So for gross or things like that, The, the
possession limit only applies when, when,
while hunting or returning for hunting.
So we've got, you know, basically
Upland game birds, things like that,
where we've got a daily limit and
a possession limit migratory game
birds are managed by the federal
government silent kind of like salmon.
When a, when a species is crossing
national borders, it's managed federally,
you know, BC doesn't work with the
United States on salmon kind of thing.
It's a, it's a federal thing.
And I'm just looking in, and it does say
except for migratory game birds, where
the possession limit applies at all times.
So, um, it's a bit outside my
jurisdiction when we start talking
about migratory game birds and the
regulations that apply to them.
So, um, I might have to look
into that a little bit more.
That would be a regulation under the
migratory game bird, a migratory bird
convention act of 1917 federal regulation.
So it, sorry for the confusion.
Oh, no, it's okay.
I mean, there's, there's always going
to be these, these areas where hunters
want to know exactly what to do or
what not to, cause it can get confusing
with the overlap, just like fishing.
There's going to be federal regulations,
provincial lake regulations.
If you're fishing in, um, uh, for salmon,
if you're a freshwater fishing, the
provinces involved in saltwater fishing
and as it's all defined, one of the other
areas that I wouldn't expect you to have,
uh, an answer on, but maybe you've heard
before, or maybe you do have an answer on.
So when people purchase their species
tags now, uh, under the new and I'm
going to do air quotes new because it's
been a few years system, uh, they're
required to keep those species tags on.
And be able to present them
to a conservation officer or
authority, went out, hunting
along with some form of photo ID.
So even if that species, uh,
license, if that tag has been
canceled, these are still legally
required to hold that on them.
When they're, let's say I'm out moose
hunting, but I've already got my, uh, my
deer tags filled, um, when they go out
for migratory bird, which is now hunting.
So I guess a province is okay.
Yes, you can hunt in our province,
but migratory bird, you know,
hunting for a federally regulated
species, do they still have to keep
their provincial tags with them?
Do you know?
Or if you've ever heard that
one before and the safe answer
is, yeah, just keep it with you.
Right.
And that's the, that covers their basis.
But I don't know if that's something
you guys have ever encountered or heard.
It's a question that was asked.
I have heard that question before,
and I think it's a bit of a gray area.
If you're out hunting, it's really hard
for a conservation officer to know, are
you only hunting those migratory birds?
Maybe because of the area it's obvious,
but, um, I think to be on the safe side
because of the hunting regulation and
if you are in BC and you're hunting,
um, that regulation states you should
carry, uh, all of your licenses,
your species licenses with you.
Well hunting.
I think it's a safe bet
to just have them on you.
Yeah, that's sort of where
I was leaning as well.
Just when, whenever there's a
gray area or area of confusion,
just make it abundantly obvious.
Should you?
We have one instructor.
He says, it's all about CYA.
He asked the class, you
know, what CYA stands for?
And everyone showed.
So the normal he's like, no, it's, can
you articulate if you had to stand in
front of a judge, can you articulate
why you're doing what you're doing?
And so it's way easier to articulate
if you're going above and beyond what
the, uh, whenever there's areas of
confusion like that CYA principal.
So CYA going back to the migratory
game birds, um, don't exceed your
possession limit at any time.
Now, just looking at the federal Reagan.
And I mean, if somebody wanted further
clarity contact the Canadian wildlife
service, but CYA on my part, don't
exceed the possession limit for migratory
game birds, even in your normal.
Good.
Okay, good.
Good to know.
I just looked through their rigs.
Good.
Okay.
Do not exceed at any time.
Okay.
Um, what does the future
for Leh kind of look like?
I don't know if, I mean, obviously
elections happen, things change,
but is there anything in the works?
Anything that, I mean, we've
got a big one up north.
That's a, probably not something we want
to get into, but it's probably tying
up a lot of your time at this moment.
Uh, um, what's the future of Leh and BC
look like we'll continue
to upset and anger hunters.
Province-wide uh, I mean, that,
that is a reality, you know, and
we talked about that supply demand
curve when we've got 180,000 people
applying for 10,000 authorizes.
People are going to get upset.
It's just the way it is.
I mean, even my brother, you know,
whenever the draw happens, he phones
me and he gets mad and some reason
thinks it's my fault that he didn't
get this moose tag or his moose
moose draw this year or next year.
Right.
Um, I mean, we will,
people will get upset.
There is, as far as I am concerned, no way
to make everybody happy every year with
Leh, it just can't happen unless like I
was linking it to the general open season.
If we, you know, found some way
to increase the number of Leh
authorizations to do that, we'd have
to either increase the number of
animals out there, which is the ideal
solution or, um, you know, reduce the
general open seasons or something.
I mean, there's still that first
priority of conservation, but, um, The
future of Leh, there may be changed.
We know it's not perfect.
You know, we know we're
going to upset people.
We know it's not a perfect system and
there's going to be room for improvement.
I don't think there's any jurisdiction.
That's really nailed it.
And I don't think it's fair or
appropriate necessarily to compare
BC to other jurisdictions because
there's nuances that change everything.
Um, you know, point systems, for example,
if, for some of the hunts, if you were
to apply a point system in BC, people
wouldn't be getting their first Leh
authorization until they were 115 years
old, you know, or they would just never
get one that, you know, things like that.
It just, you can't really
compare BC to other places.
Our buyer diversity is different.
Our, our society is different.
There's just a whole bunch of differences.
We need something.
Each jurisdiction needs something
that's tailored to the people
and the wildlife and the habitats
and environments where the.
Um, but, but there are ways I think
that we can improve the system,
at least at least give it the
perception that it's being more fair
or, you know, doing a better job of
distributing those hunting opportunities
to a broader range of people.
You know, things like that.
Maybe we'll see some changes in the
coming years around, you know, those
kinds of things, the stuff to say.
But, but we, we, we are looking at it.
We are interested in, in, in any
improvements that we can do while still
meeting that conservation objective.
Well said, is there anything
that we haven't talked about that
we should probably talk about?
Or are there any common questions
that kind of come through that you'd
really want people to know about
or anything you guys personally
want BC residents to know about?
We have covered everything.
Yeah, we haven't talked about
tentative numbers, which I think
might be worthwhile mentioning.
So, um, when we produce the limited
entry hunting synopsis and, oh, we
don't print that anymore, by the
way, if anybody's interested, we
stopped printing it when COVID hit.
Cause we had no way to
distribute it to hunters.
We still had the name, same number of
applications when it wasn't printed.
And it seems, uh, not an efficient use
of our resources to print that thing.
It's only got a shelf life of a couple
of months and then it's useless.
Plus you have to go
online to apply anyway.
So why not go online and
see the actual Leh synopsis?
So, so when we produce that Leh synopsis
and when we get our Leh application page
up and running, it's got a tentative
number of authorizations listed.
And we try as artists, we can to have
the tentative number of authorizations as
close as possible to the final decided.
But there, there are often changes.
When I, when we ask the regional
biologists for their tentative numbers,
we just kind of say, what do you think?
You know, how many authorized
authorizations do you think we'll be
looking at for this particular hunt code
for this particular species in this area,
you don't have to give us an exact number.
And I know you can't give us an
exact number because you haven't
got the Leh harvest survey data.
Yet you don't have the
hunter survey data yet.
Maybe you're waiting on some consumer
compulsory inspection information.
You know, we know you don't have all
the information to give us a final
recommended number, but we need
something to give people, to give
hunters and applicants an idea of what
to expect for this hunter coming up.
So we use that tentative number
it's as close as possible.
But we can get, but, uh, you know,
there are changes between it.
So if anybody's wondering anyways,
what that tentative number
is, that's, that's kind of it
interesting.
Okay.
That, that helps explain some things too.
Well, anything else we should
touch on before wrapping up?
No, I think I'm good.
Okay.
Well, Sarah, Stephen, thank you very
much for coming on the Silvercore
Podcast and providing your expertise
really appreciate you taking the time.
And thanks for having me.
This was a lot of fun.
I really enjoyed this.