Welcome to Chattering With iCatCare, the official monthly podcast of International Cat Care, hosted by Yaiza Gomez-Mejias (Veterinary Community Co-ordinator). Each month, we chatter about cats and cat-friendly practices with industry experts and contributors to The Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. Each episode contains highlights from our longer discussions and interviews, which are accessible to iCatCare members at portal.icatcare.org. If you would like access to our full episodes, would like to become an iCatCare Veterinary Society Member, or find out more about our Cat-Friendly schemes, visit icatcare.org.
Nathalie Dowgray: Welcome to the
August 2023 episode of
Chattering with ISFM. I'm Dr.
Nathalie Dowgray, Head of ISFM
and host of this month's
podcast. First up this month I'm
going to be speaking with ISFM’s
own Dr. Sam Taylor. She's the
presenting author of the
scientific committee best
abstract award from our 2023
Congress, we're going to be
discussing her abstract which is
on the outcome of 307 cats
treated for FIP. And that was
with a combination of Remdesivir
and or GS 441524. We're also
going to be featuring our
monthly JFMS clinical spotlight
interview. And this month, this
is with Dr. Kelly St Denis
talking with Dr. Maria
Soltero-Rivera, about feline
chronic gingivostomatitis. We
hope you enjoy this episode.
So just to start with Sam, I was
really interested to know what
prompted you to start gathering
cases for this study.
Sam Taylor: We have been running
our FIP advice email service and
we set that up because we knew
that people would have questions
about these novel drugs. And we
also ourselves wanted to learn
and connect with people around
the world who were using the
drugs. And from that we've
worked out that there were some
of the same queries and some
different queries. And we
thought, can we bring this all
together to tell more people
about this collective
experience? If we could show
that they worked, and that they
were safe, and we could educate
people a little bit more on what
to look for adverse effect wise,
and then hopefully, as a
consequence, get these quality
kind of products where we know
what's in them, to more people
around the world.
Nathalie Dowgray: When you were
starting this process, and the
group of you were starting the
plans, how did you agree the
inclusion criteria, especially
for the diagnosis of FIP?
Sam Taylor: Yeah, and I think
that was really challenging. One
of the particularly challenging
things about a retrospective
like this is the variable, sort
of, levels of investigation that
are done. And we had, it's
another thing that I kind of
like about the study, but it was
also challenging, we had cases
treated in referral that had
MRI, CSF, PCR, you know, really
extensive investigation. And
then we had cats that were, you
know, quite understandably and
pragmatically treated based on
the likelihood of diagnosis. And
so we thought, how are we going
to handle that. And so what I
did is I reviewed all the cases,
and we categorised them
according to basically something
that the ABCD use. And so we
start off with these sort of
categories of being confirmed,
highly suspicious, and very
likely. And we thought that
might be a good way of looking
at the cases so that we could
still include those
pragmatically treated cases that
didn't have every bit of data.
And the other reason we wanted
to include all those cases,
because I wanted it to be real.
And if we just include those
cases that have had 1000s of
pounds of referral workup,
that's not real, that's not
relevant to the person who is
working in primary care. And so
we really wanted to have those
cats included. And I hope we've
managed to do it in that way.
Nathalie Dowgray: Brilliant.
Now, that's a really clever way
of doing it. And you managed to
include 307 cases, that's a
fantastic number. How many did
you have to exclude?
Sam Taylor: Well, not too many
is the answer. So things that we
excluded, we were very clear, we
wanted to exclude cats that have
been treated with black market
products for part of their
treatment, which in some
countries, and particularly in
the early treated cases, very
understandable that some of them
had some treatments in that way.
But that would mean we couldn't
interpret the results and the
effects of the treatments that
we wanted to study. So we
excluded those cats and then we
also excluded cats where, when I
followed their history or when
the vet submitted their history,
we didn't have enough
information on how they'd
responded and we couldn't
provide that level of detail. We
actually only excluded about 11
cases in the end.
Nathalie Dowgray: Brilliant.
Sam Taylor: In general, higher
doses give you better responses.
But the other thing I really
learnt from the study, which
probably is true of all cats is
this huge amount of variation.
So what really surprised me was
that some cats that were treated
with lower doses, that were very
sick, actually responded very
well. And then you've got other
cats that were treated with
higher doses that didn't do as
well. Although we will give
dosage advice, that should be
adapted to the individual,
depending on their response. We
weren't seeing adverse effects
with those high doses. So the
drugs do seem to be very well
tolerated. But lots of
individual variation. I never
thought we'd be here where we're
talking about 84% response to a
treatment when you have FIP in
the same sentence. So I'm hoping
you know that in another five
years, we'll have really
individualised treatment, we'll
have other drugs, we'll do
combination. I think it's, you
know, super exciting, where
we're gonna go with this.
Nathalie Dowgray: The full paper
from this abstract has now been
accepted for publication, so do
watch out for that in JFMS. Now
I'm going to be handing over to
Dr. Kelly St Denis talking with
Dr Maria Soltero-Rivera on her
JFMS clinical spotlight article
‘Feline Chronic
Gingivostomatitis: Current
concepts in the clinical
management’. Don't forget JFMS
is an open access journal now.
So the link to read that full
article is in the show notes.
Kelly St Denis: Welcome Dr.
Soltero-Rivera.
Maria Soltero-Rivera: Thank you,
Kelly. Thank you for having me.
Kelly St Denis: So some of your
focus on your research obviously
has been within the feline
dentistry aspect and obviously
FCGS. So in addition to just
diagnosing dental disease in
general, like Feline Chronic
Gingivostomatitis is something
that some clinicians struggle
with, because as we've learned
through the review article, one
of the main treatments is
surgical extraction. There's
always some hesitancy there. So
are there any tips that you
could give to clinicians that
would say help them to feel more
confident in that diagnosis on
observation and moving forward
with dental that you could
share?
Maria Soltero-Rivera: Yeah,
absolutely. It's a disease that
has been for some time
recognised grossly, and it
hasn't been recognised in more
objective ways. What I mean by
that is we've relied on people
looking at the oral cavity and
saying, yay or nay, it has
stomatitis. But I think we have
to remember that there are some
objective ways to characterise
the disease that we haven't been
as reliant on in the past that I
hope that we can bring into
light with this review. This is
a disease that affects different
areas of the oral mucosa, the
buccal mucosa is affected, the
alveolar mucosa is affected, and
you need to have all of those
affected, not just one or the
other. I think all of those need
to be affected. Where is the
inflammation centred, usually in
the back of the oral cavity
lateral to the palatoglossal
arches. And then you dive in and
you say, All right, what is here
microscopically. You want to
find lymphoplasmacytic
inflammation. We're currently
working on this theory that if
you see other cell types in
there, like eosinophils, things
can be a little bit different.
And we could be dealing with a
different subtype of this
disease. So I think
characterising the
histopathology is important to
confirm your suspicion, and to
see if there's anything that
could modify the disease or the
prognosis for these cats, and
then figuring out, Hey, how are
we doing in terms of viral
status, right? So is FeLV FIV
involved and FCV involved and
whenever possible, once there
becomes a commercial test, is
foamy virus involved? Because
all of these have been known to
modify the disease, if you will,
and certainly the response to
treatment can be affected by
these factors. It's not only the
oral cavity that's affected,
there are multiple systems
affected and that's what we're
trying to pull apart as we
continue to study this disease.
Kelly St Denis: Did you want to
tell us a little bit about how
someone decides between partial
versus full mouth extraction?
Maria Soltero-Rivera: Yeah, in
general, when you do your oral
evaluation, again, going back to
where is the inflammation
localised and extending to. In
our practice when the
inflammation extends all the way
rostrally to affect the incisors
and the canines, we recommend
full mouth extractions. It's
when those incisors and canine
teeth look a little bit less
effective or less effective
altogether. Sometimes you have
those that have the inflammation
just confined to the back of the
mouth, then you start thinking,
should I try to preserve teeth
and it's not wrong to take a
staged approach, but the
conversation with the client
should be very clear in that
this may not be curative. When
we look at those studies that we
did, comparing partial versus
full mouth extractions, we
didn't necessarily see a
significant difference in
response between the two
treatments. That said, we were
treating with partial mouth
extractions. So the patients
that didn't have that rosteral
involvement, right? So whether
we're treating the different
degree of severity, a different
manifestation or subtype of the
disease or treating other
diseases that were confusing
with FCGS? That's a good
question. I think that, again,
it's not wrong to start with
partial mouth extractions, if
the inflammation is only
confined to the caudal oral
cavity, it's just the way that
we present it to the clients
saying, this is, you and I are
going steady here. Now that
we're treating this patient.
Kelly St Denis: it's not a one
and done.
Maria Soltero-Rivera: This is
not a one and done. And we're
going to have to monitor them
closely. And if we have to come
back to extract the rest of the
teeth, we will, we will do that.
Kelly St Denis: Excellent. Thank
you so much. I've really enjoyed
chatting with you. And I hope
everyone has the opportunity to
check out the current concepts
in the clinical management of
Feline Chronic
Gingivostomatitis. Thank you,
Dr. Maria Soltero-Rivera, and
thank you to your colleagues as
well for this great review
article. And as I've said,
there's a lot of really
practical information in that
review article that you can use
in practice and some charts and
guidance that I think we all
could use on a day to day basis.
So definitely check it out, and
it is open access. So have a
look. Thanks again.
Maria Soltero-Rivera: Thank you
Nathalie Dowgray: Thank you for
listening. If you are an ISFM
veterinary member don’t forget
you can access the full version
of this podcast and all the
other ISFM veterinary membership
benefits including congress
recordings, monthly webinars,
our clinical club, the
discussion forum and much more
at portal.icatcare.org. We will
be back next month, If you don’t
want to miss out, do make sure
you sign up to Chattering with
ISFM on you preferred podcast
platform.