Product Marketing Adventures

Subscription overload is real. You open Netflix, scroll for ages, jump to Hulu, maybe Disney+, and still end up rewatching The Office or Parks and Rec. Then your credit card bill hits and you’re left wondering why you’re paying for all these subscriptions in the first place. That “is this still worth it?” feeling is the loyalty problem, and it’s not just entertainment. SaaS brands are fighting the same battle for habit, relevance, and ongoing value perception.

In this episode, we dig into one of the most interesting examples of a PMM stepping straight into that challenge: Disney+ and customer loyalty in a category where churn is constant and attention can shift overnight. Joining us is James Schultz, the PMM who built the program, now at Netflix thinking deeply about customer experience in an increasingly personalised world.

James shares the thinking behind Disney+ Perks, including how he approached the problem before anyone started throwing rewards at it. We talk about what he looked at to understand cancellation behaviour, how he thought about different customer groups, and why perceived value is the lever that matters when discounting is the easy trap.

We also get into what it takes to execute a loyalty program so it doesn’t fade into the background after launch, plus a quick messaging critique of BODYARMOR’s “Choose Better” and why clarity beats aspiration when you want a line people can actually repeat. James wraps with a simple warning that applies to loyalty and messaging alike: validate first, build second, and make the value obvious.



LINKS


Messaging Critique (BODYARMOR)
: https://www.drinkbodyarmor.com/ 

Connect with James:

LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/jamesjacobschultz 

Connect with Elle:

LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/elle3izabeth/ 
Website: https://www.productmarketingadventures.com/ 

What is Product Marketing Adventures?

Product Marketing Adventures is the only PMM show that goes beyond theory and into the real execution of product marketing. In each episode, experienced product marketers co-host two segments of the show: first a case study example of their work, followed by a messaging critique of companies we admire. Listeners enjoy a fun conversation packed with practical guidance to leverage in your product marketing career.

I want to start with a
behavior that feels a

little ridiculous when
you say it out loud, but

I bet all of us do this.

So here it is.

You open Netflix, scroll for
15 minutes, then maybe jump

over to Hulu, then Disney
Plus, then maybe HBO, but

somehow you end up rewatching
The Office or Parks and

Rec for the hundredth time.

And then a few weeks later,
you look at your credit

card bill and think, "Wait,
why am I paying for all

of these subscriptions?"
The entertainment industry

is not the only one
with a loyalty problem.

All of us in SAS know this.

Brands are no longer
competing only on product

quality or features.

They're competing on
habit, relevance, emotional

connection, personalization,
and the ability to

continuously remind customers
why they should stay.

Today's episode is one of
the most interesting examples

I've seen of a PMM stepping
directly into this challenge.

We're talking about how Disney
Plus approached customer

loyalty in a category where
consumers cancel subscriptions

constantly, attention sh-
can shift overnight, and

everyone is fighting for
recurring value perception.

And I could not think of
a better person to walk

us through this than
the PMM who built the

program, James Schulz.

James is currently at Netflix,
where he's thinking deeply

about customer experience and
the future of entertainment

in an increasingly
personalized world.

But before Netflix, he
led program strategy and

development for not one but
two major loyalty programs.

First, DirecTV Perks, one of
the first rewards programs in

the entertainment industry.

and he launched with the
campaign TV That Loves

You Back and gave away
over $100,000 in prizes.

And then most recently, he
led Disney Plus Perks, which

is still in its early days,
but it has already shaped

how streaming platforms
think about loyalty.

Oh, and here's a
really fun fact.

Outside of work, James is
an avid volleyball player

who competes across indoor,
grass, and beach formats.

He even played on an adult
traveling team across the

US and Canada, including a
match at the Richmond Olympic

Oval in British Columbia,
the same venue used during

the 2010 Winter Olympics.

James, it's amazing to
have you on the show.

Likewise.

Hi, Elle.

What an intro.

I think I found my
new LinkedIn bio.

I'm gonna have to
like copy and paste

all of

Do it.

Uh, I've also definitely
seen "Parks and Recs" over

100 times, one of my go-to
shows, so I totally feel that.

Uh, but it's so great to be
here and thanks for having me.

Definitely.

Yeah, I'm currently
rewatching Parks and

Rec right now, actually.

I'm in, uh, about
halfway through Season 2.

So good

It's so good.

Okay, let's jump right in.

So you're currently at
Netflix, and I do wanna

come back to that, but
today's case study is really

about your time at Disney.

So for the first segment of
our show, we're gonna jump

into the case study segment,
where we're talking all

about how you helped create
the first true customer

loyalty program really for
the whole entertainment/like

streaming industry.

So, and what's really
fascinating about your story

is that Disney had already
had, has one of the strongest

brands in the world, right?

Like massive
emotional affinity.

I feel like being like
a Disney person has been

a phrase that I've heard
nearly my entire life.

So I mean, we're talking
like generational fandom.

So I guess like even with
all of that, streaming

still created churn
behavior, which is just

what's so interesting here.

So take us back to the
moment when-- like think

back to your time at Disney.

What was happening with
Disney+ when you realized

like loyalty had become a much
bigger business conversation?

Yeah, definitely.

So one, we love
a Disney adult.

that's like key.

But we'll talk a little
bit more about some

of those audiences.

I think before jumping into
why loyalty as a business

objective was so important,
uh, I think it's important

to set the stage of just
the explosion of SVOD or

streaming serv- streaming
video on demand services

in general, and what that
landscape looked like.

Um, 'cause we have all heard
the term streaming wars, and

that really kinda changed
the trajectory of like how

we consume entertainment.

So when we're thinking about
these new business ventures

around SVOD services, there
was this major uncertainty

from investors that
required focus on growth,

growth, growth, right?

How many s- who can get
the most subscribers, um,

and who can be the first
to profitability, right?

We needed to prove out
the worth that this is an

actual sustainable business
venture for a lot of these

entertainment studios as well.

so when you think about like
monitoring customer churn or

like when you hear churn, it's
really those that are deciding

to cancel the service, albeit
many different reasons.

There's involuntary
churn, um, but primarily

it's voluntary churn.

You're making a decision
to say, "I wanna cancel

this service." and
that was always there.

That was always looked at
as a KPI, but I would say it

probably took a back seat.

As I mentioned earlier,
a lot of it was focused

around growth and growing
that, that share of pie, and

getting, uh, to profitability
as quickly as possible.

So I wanna note that,
again, these are general

industry tr- trends.

Um, not like isolating
or calling out Disney

specifically, but
it's something that we

monitor and we look at
across the landscape.

And again, it's not i-
isolated to Disney+ per se,

but like as growth slowed
and some of these higher

penetration markets like
the US or even after some of

these companies decided to
go global, growth started to

slow and we wanted to start
looking at, you know, how do

we retain our subscribers?

So you start thinking about
all of these macroeconomic

factors, that are impacting
consumers' wallets.

Uh, you're looking at
the many, many choices

of SVOD services now
with the introduction of

HBO Max and Hulu and I
mean, you name it, right?

A- and I feel like there's
so many direct-to-consumer

streaming services now.

you think about the content
troughs where you have a big

release and then maybe it
goes quiet for a few months,

and then another big release.

those are all factors
that, that play into

what we call churn.

Um, especially in like
regulations in countries,

which I think we'll talk
about a little bit later.

I'll, I'll double-click
into this, which is, um,

making it easy for people
to cancel subscriptions just

as easy as it is to sign up.

So there's essentially lower
friction for people to cancel.

so all of this, I would
say, kinda created this

perfect storm, in essence.

And when you're… previously
you think about cable or

satellite, where it was
traditionally how we consumed

entertainment, there were
high switching costs.

So you would think about, "Oh
my God, I have to call, I have

to schedule an appointment
with a technician to come out,

I have to pay installation
fees to get all my equipment

installed." You're getting
locked into a contract.

like real rip and
replace costs, right,

yep, you get the

point, right?

Yeah

have to ship your
old equipment back.

So when you're thinking
about this from a consumer

lens, there was this almost
like ingrained loyalty

because of the high sw-
switching cost, right?

You stayed with DirecTV
or you stayed with Dish

Network or whatever your
service provider was at the

time, Charter, because of
that high switching cost.

But now with SVOD services,
you know, we're making it

really easy for consumers
to sign up but also

cancel, so, and likely
without commitments.

so when you think about
that, like that low switching

cost kind of emphasizes the
ability for consumers to

churn and burn, and then
sign up when they want to.

So when you're thinking
about growth, while it's

still important to hit the
profitability, you know,

people were starting to
get hit with frequent price

increases with the SVOD
services as well, right?

Um, as people were cutting
the cord, they're starting

to replace those with
multiple SVOD subscription

services, and those
costs start adding up.

And as those… you have six
services, you start seeing

price increases across
all of them, it starts

to hit the wallet a bit.

consumers start doing
the math and adding it up

and saying, "Okay, well
what can I cut?" Right?

And sometimes entertainment's
one of the first to go.

So that really created
the moment where, again,

consumers are constantly
evaluating their wallets to

see if price, matches what
the value they're seeing

in their, in their service.

and if not, a cancellation
request is incoming.

Yeah.

And we see that in SaaS too,
um, even in B2B, it's an

easy, if there's not that,
especially if there's not

that high switching costs, if
a certain vendor is not, if

there's not perceived value,
then there's absolutely that

shift into a different vendor.

yeah, so it was kind
of the task at hand.

Like, how did you, you
mentioned you had this big,

um, these big trends that
you were seeing just on a

macro scale that were then
trickling down and influencing

your particular industry.

Like, what did you do once
you realized you were in

that, in that situation?

Yeah.

Before I dive into that, have
you heard of the leaky bucket?

Oh, yes.

Yeah, but let's like,
like talk through it.

Talk through it
for our listeners

Yeah.

So imagine trying to fill a
bucket with water, but it has

holes at the bottom, right?

You'll never be able to
fill that bucket unless

you plug the holes.

So in this metaphor, the
bucket's your business, the

water are your subscribers
or your customers, uh, and

the holes are churn, right?

So how do you, how do you
plug the leaky bucket?

and to your-- our earlier
point, even with the powerful

fandom of Disney, we still
experience subscriber churn,

and that was a problem
that needed to be solved.

So we knew we had the
loyal Disney fans, right?

The ones that pass it
on to their, their kids,

um, and it keeps going.

You have the people that go
to Disneyland ritually, right?

Um, but, but we also had those
casual fans that maybe only

resonated with maybe a few
titles that were on service

or a few of the franchises.

I'm a prime example.

I'm really only interested
in "Star Wars" content.

I didn't tell anyone
at Disney that.

and maybe some, maybe some
National Geographic content.

But these audiences are more
likely to churn in between

those content troughs that
I, uh, spoke to earlier.

Right.

Oh, I'm, I'll come back
when Mandalorian comes back.

Exactly.

And, you know, when you think
about these audiences, the

loyal and the casual fan,
there's opportunities in

both to improve retention.

So the question we asked
ourselves was: How can

we leverage loyalty and
harness the synergies of

the Walt Disney Company
as a retention tactic to

plug a few of the holes?

Mm-hmm.

We knew this wasn't gonna
solve everything, but even

just a small reduction in
churn had huge financial

benefits for the company.

I love that you thought about
like, okay, well what is the,

the big perceived value that
Disney offers as a brand,

not necessarily just the
product of Disney+, and then

leveraging that differentiator
and seeing how can we kind

of bring all this together.

So, okay, what did
this look like?

Like, you kind of, you had
these like big macro trends.

You then, you know, know
how you're gonna move

forward with, somehow
leveraging, the broader

value that Disney offers.

So walk me through, like,
the action that you took

and how you actually,
put this into play

So I would say the first
thing we wanted to do is

really identify the problem.

We talked a little
bit about it, right?

Around like, yes, there's
this churn problem, which was

essentially it was like, how
do we reduce subscriber churn?

We then looked at the data to
determine what is that leading

indicator for voluntary churn.

Why are people canceling?

you can probably give
a guess at what it was.

Um, I think, again, as
I alluded to earlier,

there's a lot of price
sensitivity, price value.

Um, so price was technically
something that really

stood out for us as we were
looking at, at the data.

So we said, "Okay, well,
we can't reduce the

subscription price."

Like that's-- Wall Street
will never allow that.

so how can we just infer that
there's this imbalance of

price to value perception, and
how can we increase that value

of our subscription to justify
the price that they're paying?

our hypothesis was that
by introducing subscriber

rewards as part of their
subscription, we could

reduce churn for the treated
population, or essentially

those that are actually
redeeming their rewards.

But also on the broader
landscape of like just the

subscriber base in general,
just knowing that we offer

this type of program, there
was this halo effect, um,

where not as, as impactful
as somebody redeeming a war-

redeeming a reward, but also
the ability to like know that

that's available to them.

Um, there's this halo
effect that we assumed

we would see as well.

So after that, we, we
conducted broad research.

So we looked at existing
Disney+ subscribers and

non-Disney+ subscribers,
because we also felt like

there may be, like, an
acquisition lens here as

well, to really understand
the types of rewards and

benefits that each of
these specific audiences

would like to see or, or
they would see value in.

and that step was really
imperative for the development

of the program strategy,
because we want to ensure

that we were building
something that consumers

actually wanted, and not
just building something

that we think they wanted.

so we wanted to make sure
everything we did was, was

backed by data and insights.

It was really interesting to
see the research, which it

pointed out, I mean, it's not
a game changer for folks that

are in the loyalty space.

They know people like free
access, uh, early access,

freebies, sweepstakes,
gamification elements.

So think about,
like, badge journeys.

So, "Hey, I complete
'The Mandalorian'

and I get a badge.

I unlock something." and
of course, discounts to

other Disney benefits, uh,
and business units like our

consumer products, all our,
you know, the Disney store or

our parks, uh, all of those
definitely rose to the top.

So, and then a few other
third-party partner rewards

also floated to the top.

So people like, like food
delivery services like Uber,

the likes of DoorDash, um,
they kind of go hand-in-hand

with entertainment.

You know, you're watching
something on the couch, you

know, maybe I want, like, a
buy one, get one free offer

on, or free delivery or
something like that on one

of the, uh, s- food delivery
subscription services.

so that was great news for
us because again, one of

the reasons loyalty programs
fail is, one, there's,

like, a lack of rewards.

Uh, two, the freshness
of rewards, things can

go stale very quickly.

And then three, cost, right?

Cost of procuring all
of these rewards tends

to get really expensive.

But we saw huge opportunity
for us by leveraging

the synergy of the other
Disney business units.

Uh, we could have a large
array of offers, keep them

fresh, and keep our costs low.

So again, taking a data-driven
approach, we tested a few of

those offers to validate our
hypothesis before deciding

to commit to a full loyalty
program, cause that would

be hard to walk back if we
decided to launch and didn't

have any indicators that
this was gonna be successful.

Right.

Absolutely.

So you took the time to really
study the data to figure out,

okay, well, what, why are
some of those subscribers

falling through the holes of
our, of our bucket, right?

And then after you dug into
that a little bit, then you

tried to figure out, okay,
now how do, can we leverage

the rest of what Disney has
to offer in a way that matches

the perceived value that
is, uh, motivating enough

to keep a subscriber to
stay, but then also doesn't

get stale after a while.

And so it feels like,
ooh, something new.

Ooh, something new.

Oh, it's different now.

Oh.

So it kind of keeps the
intrigue and interest,

um, even during times
when, speaking for

myself, The Mandalorian
may not be available.

Well, that was myself
b- before kids.

Now it's like, kidding me?

Disney has tremendous value.

Like,

all of it, yeah

oh, yeah, every single
pr- the, the entire

princess collection.

Yeah.

My, my niece, she's, um, about
to turn two and, you know,

my brother and sister-in-law
finally allowed them to start

watching, TV, and she has
gravitated to, to "Moana,"

and it's just, it's powerful
to see what, like, a brand

can do even for a kid at such

Oh, absolutely.

Absolutely.

And, specifically for creating
some of that loyalty, product

marketers do have to lean into
brand because that, uh, you

can't not create a customer
loyalty program without the

support of the broader brand.

I just, in my opinion, those
have to go hand in hand.

so okay.

So let's talk about like
the execution side of this.

so you identified a
potential solution, and then

you hit some crossroads.

Now, it sounds like you
did some of this data

and, now you kind of
know what you wanna do.

Did you then, like you
built that out yourself?

Feel like, do we move faster?

Do we partner externally?

I guess like ta- walk
me through kind of

that moment and how you
decided to move forward.

Yeah.

I think it's pr- important
to call out that s- we

were, like, in an intere-
interesting space, given

that this was product
marketing led, but we knew

that Endstate was gonna
be a loyalty product.

and as you mentioned earlier,
like, I had the experience at

DirecTV of building a loyalty
product from scratch or, like,

they like to say zero to one.

and we knew at Disney+
that others were starting

to look at the landscape
and beginning to find

unique ways to drive value.

And to your point, I think
we had to pitch the idea

to senior leaders and
C-level execs at Disney.

But one of the decision
points was really to build

it or buy it, and there's
pros and cons of each, right?

There's building
it, it would take

And when-- Sorry, so to ju-
I don't, to interrupt you,

when you say building it,
you mean like the customer

loyalty program itself,

right?

Yeah.

Okay.

Sorry.

Okay.

Yeah.

And I guess the two options,
building it internally versus,

"Hey, we're gonna go and
source, a partner to leverage

like a loyalty SaaS product
and integrate." So those

were kind of our two options.

So the building or
buying it, of it.

and to go back to the building
part, right, we know that

we're always fighting for
internal resourcing, uh, so

it likely would take longer
to get put on the roadmap and

to build, p- ses- essentially
pulling engineering resourcing

away from maybe another
high priority project, not

making it on the roadmap
at all because it was such,

it was so marketing led,
it's hard to fit that into

a larger product roadmap.

or even if it did, it may
take us years to build

something because, We're
building a streaming product.

We're not building a
loyalty SaaS product.

Um, and there's also this
risk of tech debt, right?

Of like continuously having
to allocate resourcing to

improve that product that
we're building internally.

so

that tech debt is so real
too, especially in like

the broader SaaS world.

So I, I think that would
resonate a lot with

a lot of PMMs who are
kind of facing the like

build versus, versus buy

Buy, exactly.

Uh, there, there is an
upside though, right?

Of building something
because you can build

it the way you want it.

You can make it
uniquely Disney.

You could limit the
cost to essentially,

like a big one-time
capital expenditure cost.

Um, you-- of course,
you would have like the

ongoing maintenance of that
product, but you wouldn't

have this like subscription
model with a partner that

you're constantly, is hit-
hitting your bottom line.

And the buy approach, right?

That, that's another
option that we weighed.

The pros of it being kind of
the out-of-box solutions with

some level of customization,
so we could still make

it feel somewhat Disney.

It would help with speed
to market, which was

really important for us.

Um, we knew everyone else
in the landscape was likely

feeling the same pressures
we were, and likely exploring

very similar alternatives

to

Yeah.

You mentioned a lot of those,
like, macro trends, industry

trends, and that plays a
role in your strategy, right?

Like, there's a reason why
you you did that initial

work of seeing what was
happening and how that was

influencing your business.

It's probably influencing your
co- competitor's business too

Exactly.

Uh, and then when you're
thinking about like

resource, like we can't
say what's gonna take zero

resourcing away even if you
go with a, a buy solution.

But the scale compared to
somebody like allocating a

whole tiger team to build
a product versus I need

some engineers to help with
some level of integration

is pretty isolated.

and we would have no tech
debt since again, as I said,

stated earlier, partnering
with a loyalty SaaS product,

they're the subject matter
experts in the field.

They're continuously updating,
enhancing their products, and

we reap the benefits of that.

and the cons is kind
of the complexity of

integrating with a partner.

Um, I think you're in the
SaaS space, you know, it's,

it's never an easy of a
flip of a switch, sadly.

so th- that was something
that we, we kept front of

mind for us as we were making
this decision, and also again,

not being fully customizable
and just the ongoing cost.

So again, pros
and cons of each.

for me the decision
was pretty obvious.

I had my recommendation
to buy versus build.

again, for me it came down
to we're an SVOD service.

We're not building loyalty
solutions, or products

for loyalty solutions,
and that we should keep

our engineers focused on
the Disney+ experience and

allow loyalty SaaS providers
to do what they do best.

We needed the speed of market.

We wanted to be the first
mover in the space, and

ideally we wanted to tout
that we were the first in

the streaming landscape,
uh, to launch such an

initiative as loyalty.

So when we think about,
sharing this with

leadership, I feel like
it was very contentious.

a lot of leaders at Disney
wanted the build route.

there was a lot of ways we
were going with even just

different internal tools of
building those internally.

But, ultimately we aligned
that buy was, was the

best decision for the
spot we were at currently.

So we kicked off the RFP,
uh, request for proposal,

for those that don't know
the acronym, to a lot of

loyalty SaaS providers.

I think the list
was like 50 long.

and I ensured to the--
to ensure it was very

collaborative because it s-
was still product marketing

led, but I wanted to assemble
a tiger team, marketing,

data analytics, product
engineering, you name it,

to really sit in on those
conversations and watch

the demos so we could make
a unified decision on who

the best partner would be.

I didn't wanna do it in a
vacuum, and this is one of the

f- only times an initiative
this large was being led by

the marketing organization.

And, that created some
tension again at the top

between marketing and product
leadership of should this be

product led or marketing led.

Uh, and we ultimately landed
that it best fit letting

marketing continue to lead,
in close collaboration

with the rest of the teams
with, for integration.

I am so glad that it ended
up being product marketing

owning the project.

I mean, one, because
then you can come on

here and talk about it.

But, um, also because I have
always felt that a product

marketer's job when we, like,
really, like, oversimplify

it maybe, is to take context
outside w- from the market,

from our customers, from our
competitors, and then bring it

back in to drive strategy, and
that's really what this was.

It's a big strategic
initiative, and it… I'm

just, I think it's, uh,
spot on to have PMM own it.

Um, but I do think a
lot of product marketers

probably struggle with that.

Like, this kind of initiative,
at least in the SAS world,

would very often fall within,
like, there's a whole team

who's responsible for customer
marketing or customer loyalty.

and I'm curious, do you--
Was there, like, a customer

loyalty or customer marketing
team within Disney Plus,

or was it all just kind of
within product marketing?

It was all within
product marketing.

We had different parts of
the business, like lifecycle

marketing that would do,

you know, the outreach and the
emails and push notifications.

But there was, but there
wasn't this centralized

force or organization or
business unit, whatever you

wanna call it.

product marketers were

that team.

Um, so I had a team of
six people, a mix of p-

product managers and product
marketers that were assembled

to lead this initiative.

So

I love that.

It's the, the,
cross-functional team.

It's, it's good that everyone
kind of aligned on that.

okay.

Uh, so this was such a
strategic moment, for you

and for your career, and
especially now where I think

product marketers are, not
only are they fighting with

each other with this like, you
know, in the immer- world of

AI that we are all immersed
in, but like also fighting

with AI of, uh, you know,
build versus buy my product.

so let's not go down th-
that rabbit hole, but I

think this is such a timely
conversation around how to

retain your customers and to
meet that perception of value.

so let's turn this
into a playbook.

Let's say that, you know,
you're coaching me on,

I'm a totally different
industry, not streaming

entertainment business, but
I have this problem where

there are market dynamics
at play where I'm starting

to see churn within certain
segments of my business.

What do I do to try to
build up a retention

or a loyalty program?

Like, what's step one?

Yeah, I would say step one is
understanding your customer

cancellation behavior and
the value perception there.

Do your research, whether
it's partnering with your data

analytics team, your customer
service teams, customer

success, success teams,

or even doing out
customer support.

Yeah, exactly.

Or outside research.

Ideally, it would be a
combination of all three, so

you can get a comprehensive
360-degree view of customer

pain points, qualitative,
quantitative data to really

inform your problem statement
and form your hypothesis.

Yeah.

So like I could see myself
doing something like pulling

CRM data to try to figure
out if there was like a

reason for cancellation, um,
sourcing support tickets.

Like, okay, did s- did,
did out of all of these

particular customers
who canceled, had they

submitted support tickets?

Had they, you know, kind of
like what are all of these

possible data sources in
front of me that I can dig

into to better understand
what caused the cancellation?

And then even going as far as
like having just an interview

conversation with them.

Harder to do in the consumer
world, but in B2B it's a

bit easier to do, have those
kinds of conversations.

you'll be surprised how
many customers are actually

willing to give feedback.

Oh, good.

Oh, good.

Yeah, I would imagine it
would just be hard to have

a one-on-one with a consumer

And, uh, there's
different touchpoints.

I mean, there's, uh,
speaking from experience

again, we've, we've seen
calls, people calling into

customer support just to give
a recommendation of the, a

product feature enhancement
that then, that's then tracked

by customer support and

fed back to product
marketing and product.

You know, we have, uh, surveys
that go out, um, that are a

little bit more quantitative,
um, or focus groups.

You know what I mean?

People are so willing to,
to give feedback, which

I, I find is, um, very
astounding and super helpful

for product marketers.

I love that.

I love that.

I'm gonna rattle off a couple
other things that kind of, uh,

come to my mind when I think
about, like, studying, like,

reasons why consumers cancel,
especially, like, just, just

to kind of touch for my,
like, B2B SaaS marketers.

I think, uh, sourcing
sales call scri- scripts

too, transcripts, to
see, like, what's kind

of like happening there.

Maybe even, like,
before it gets to the

cancellation point.

So going back in history
and figuring, "Okay, how

did we get to this point?"
You know, they clearly were

a customer at one point,
but somehow we lost them.

So how did we get
from, from A to B?

So picking maybe, like, a
few marquee customers that

you lost and trying to follow
their entire customer journey.

Like, where, where was
it starting to fall off?

And any resources you have
at your disposal to kind

of guide you through that
historic journey I think would

be super valuable as well.

Okay.

So step one was to understand
why your customers are

canceling to begin with.

So what's next?

What's step two?

I would say double-click
into that data and start

identifying some of those
different customer loyalty

profiles or audiences.

I think you named it, like
looking at some of those

marquee folks can help create
like lookalikes, right?

and when you start thinking
about those, those ins-

insights from step one
and identifying those

audiences, you can do that
depending on your resourcing.

But at Disney, luckily, we
had some advanced modeling,

um, people that are way
smarter than me as it relates

to data, where you can start
seeing their behaviors,

and see how they engage
or lack thereof, uh, with

your product or service.

Uh, for us, you know, we
identified, again, the loyal

Disney fans who had really
high engagement on Disney+

and a lower propensity
to churn, meaning less

likelihood to churn, another
fancy way to say that.

and then the casual fans,
so that low to medium

engagement on Disney+ and a
higher propensity to churn.

And we found that, hey, the
latter is really gonna be

our target audience, but
still understood that the

loyal Disney fans would
be secondary to that, just

to continue fostering that
strong connection between

the cons- consumer and the
brand because they are our

big- biggest advocates.

So again, double-clicking
into, into the data and

start creating some of these
audiences or personas that

you can then say, "Okay,
these are the people, these

are our target audiences that
we're going after, and here's

how we can tackle that."

Yeah, so it's a
classic segmentation.

Like, okay, of all of our
subscribers, including

the ones we churn, This is
interesting because you're

taking, you're, you're
applying basically a, practice

or exercise of segmentation
that you would normally

apply to basically the
broader market, but instead

you're hyper-focusing it on
specifically your customers,

your paying customers, and
then doing the segmentation

to figure out, like, degrees
of loyalty and reasons and

value perceived behind each
of those so that as you're

building out, I'm guessing
where this is going, as

you're building out the
actual program itself, you

can prioritize which of those
segments are going to ha- see

the biggest return on that

Nail, nail on the head.

Yes, exactly.

So

I'm learning, I'm

learning, I'm gonna
be … I'm taking notes for

my next loyalty program.

I've never built one, so
um, okay, so then what's

step three after I do this,
like, mini segmentation

customer double-click on
customer data internally?

Yeah.

And this might be a
little easier on the

direct-to-consumer side, but
when you think about loyalty,

I think it's important to
think about it beyond just

the core product experience.

Um, you know, we like to think
around product enhancements to

improve loyalty and retention,
saying like, "Oh, this feature

is gonna create less friction,
therefore it's gonna generate

loyalty and retention."

And while that's true, we
knew that there was a price

value issue and consumers
wanted more value for the

price that they were paying.

And after the research, you
know, we started to test

specific offers to those
specific audiences, right?

Being able to segment
the casual fans had very

different wants and needs
than the Disney loyal fans.

So being able to, to
test and validate our

hypothesis with different
rewards, was, was super

helpful, insightful for us.

Uh, at the end of the day, our
hypothesis was validated, but

I do wanna be clear that, you
know, we still needed to make

sure that whatever we were
building was still heavily

attributed back to streaming.

So although we were giving
rewards that may be outside

Disney Plus, like, "Hey, we--
get free tickets to go to the

parks or win a sweepstakes
for a National Geographic

cruise," it was always
tied back to Disney Plus.

It was unlock this as
a subscriber, right?

We wanted the attribution
because at the end of the

day, we didn't want to
end up in the consumer's

mind of like, "Why is
Disney Plus offering this?

This is so odd." So there
has t- there had to be

this correlation back to
the Disney Plus service.

Um,

course.

Yeah.

for us.

Yeah, so I'm, again, like
I'm kind of translating.

I'm trying to strip out
like the context and like

translate it back to like
if I'm like in SAS that if

I'm digg- looking at this
particular customer segment

and I'm understanding like,
what is the perceived value?

Like let's take away
the monetary value for

a minute and like actual
business outcomes, like

what are they trying to get
out of using my product?

And take the spirit of that
and then try to understand

what else can I offer them
that can validate what

they're trying to get out
of my product or offering,

and now put that monetary
dollar amount back in.

Be like, "Okay, so it was
just this that you were

trying to get from being a
subscriber, and you like this.

Now I'm gonna give you all
these other things," and it

doesn't, you know, it offsets
my cost for XYZ reasons,

but you're still paying
the same amount but now,

but you have all of these
other opportunities that

just kind of validate the
reasons why you became a s-

subscriber in the first place.

That's kind of how
I'm imagining it.

Is that kind of the
right way to think

Exactly.

Exactly.

Yeah.

And some interesting findings
that we saw, I just wanna like

loop back around to an example
is, you know, we had National

Geographic content on service.

We partnered with that team
for, it was like, I think

a seven-day cruise to the
Galapagos Islands, which

is like one really cool.

I wish I could, could've
won that sweepstakes,

right?

Um, and it was really
interesting to see that, one,

we had a really high level of
entries, but second to that,

we saw a huge increase in
National Geographic content

being watched on service.

So there's this, like, even
though we're doing-- we're

thinking beyond the core
product experience as far as

rewards, it was tying back
to business objectives of

higher engagement on platform,
which then ultimately is,

uh, reduces churn as well.

Right, right.

I love that.

So the, again, like I'm
gonna repeat what you

said that step three was,
like to think beyond the

core product experience.

And again, if I'm thinking
of like how this would

apply in like a, you know,
a SaaS world, maybe beyond

that product experience
doesn't necessarily come

from your partn- from your,
um, from your internal

company, but maybe it's a,
it's a business partner.

Um, so I'm even imagining
like if there are particular

industries or use cases
where you go to market with

a particular partner, maybe
there's ways that you can

add partners into the mix to
increase that perceived value.

Um, so I, I really like
that step of like, as you're

thinking about crafting
the actual loyalty program

itself to think beyond that
core product experience.

Okay.

So what's the next step here?

I would say the next step
is, this one is probably

the, the most crucial,
is just evaluating speed,

resources, and your
strategic differentiation.

So I'll keep this one short
because I know we just

spoke at length about this
already, but I do think

it's important to weigh all
your possible options since

no business is the same.

Does it make sense for you
to launch a loyalty program?

The answer's not always

yes.

But again, we're all
fighting for resourcing.

We're always up against the
clock to ship something,

and what are the trade-offs
for any decision you make?

Do you have a set date
that needs to be, it

needs to be launched by?

Um, is it driven by
leadership, right?

Have they set a date
that you need to meet?

That's all gonna
impact your decisions.

Um, is it aligning to a
larger brand moment or

is the desire, like what
Disney+ was, kind of be the

first mover in this space?

All of these are, are
different forces that are

kind of gonna help you make,
make the right decision.

Um, do you have the
resources internally to build

something and maintain it?

Um, do you have the
funds and the commitment

from leadership, right?

Is this a top-down alignment
or do you need to create

that top-down alignment?

Which is critical in
order to be successful.

Leadership needs
to be bought in.

Um, so again, all of
these questions need to be

answered, but I don't-- it,
it doesn't need to, you don't

need to do it in a silo.

Again, collaboration
across the organization

is so important.

One, you get buy-in, but most
importantly, number two, you

ensure that there aren't any
blind spots in your decision.

So you'll be surprised
about how many partners we

evaluated, and I was like, "Oh
yeah, this is the one." Like,

"Let's sign it tomorrow."

And, you know, it came down
to, like, and engineering

spoke up and was like, "We're
not gonna be able to integrate

with them." Like, "Th- this
would be impossible." Um,

and, like, having those
people in the room that are

looking at it from a different
lens was so critical.

And again, for us,
it came down to speed

to market, limited
resourcing, and competing

with company priorities.

So, um, yeah.

Again, that was
kind of all of that

and and that kind of
culminated into the decision.

But again, evaluating
speed, your resourcing,

and then how are you gonna
differentiate yourself,

um, with the competition?

How do you,

Yeah.

your program unique?

So I'm-- Those are the way
that I'm, um, imagining your

entire playbook built out.

Here's how I'm
thinking about it.

Let me know if this,
like, jives with you.

I'm thinking, like, your step
one was to just, like, get

immersed in the research,
then go, "Why are you

seeing churn," et cetera.

Step two was like, okay,
then that was that, like,

segmentation analysis of
your existing customers.

And then step three was
to think beyond the core

product experience as you're
trying to dream out, okay,

what does this loyalty
program actually look like?

I feel like your step
four is actually in

parallel to all of that.

It's like wra- it's all
of that wrapped up in,

like, the true go-to-market
strategy for this

particular loyalty program.

And it's, um… I would-- How
I would do this would be like

your step four is kind of
happening, uh, simultaneously

as you're doing all those
other three steps, right?

Like, and you're, you create
that tiger team as you talked

about doing at Disney, right?

Like, you create that tiger
team, and you're coming

together with the analysis
that you're doing and,

you know, you're having
checkpoints, you're doing

feedback loops, like, kind
of constantly as you're

doing some of those, like,
some of that analysis.

And especially for the
dreaming up, like your step

three, I could imagine that
being so valuable to have,

like, someone from product,
someone from customer life

cycle marketing, someone
from, you know, engineering.

Like, everyone who would
be part of bringing this

loyalty program to the world
could help, um, enhance

all of those, like your
step one through three.

What do you think of that?

Like, is that something that
you'd recommend that I do?

Yeah, definitely.

And again, I think this is
all kind of the buildup to

that moment, but I think
there's, like, another

step we're also missing
is, like, the execution,

right?

Um, so it's all great, right?

I

think-- Yeah, just
minor things, right?

I mean, you know, your s-
your program's only gonna

be as successful as your
execution, and I think

that's another important
step to, to consider.

Um, 'cause I know we
talked a lot about, like,

the building program and

I, uh, I did ask you how
to build it, to be fair.

But I think it would be amiss
for us not to talk about this,

like, step five essentially
is, like, execution.

Um, and I can't come up
with, like, a fancier

title for this step, which
you could probably do.

But I, I think that's
something that we noticed too

is you could have the best
strategy in the world, but

if you lack execution, that's
where something can fail.

So being really cognizant,
um, and have a plan in place,

you know, not only what's your
program strategy, but how do

you get p- how do you position
this in the marketplace?

How do you message it?

Um, and how do you kinda
keep the lights on after

your launch, right?

Um, so just some things
to, to think about, and

maybe that could be a
whole nother episode of,

you know, after you build
it, how do you market it?

Yeah.

We're gonna … We, we
should do a part two.

Okay, I want to ask you
a few questions before we

move on to the next segment.

So I would be remiss not
to not ask about this.

Um, so this, uh, program
that you built at

Disney+ was a pre-AI,

for the most part, initiative.

How do you think about
customer loyalty programs

and cus- managing customers'
expectations, like, in, in

the new world that we're
in today with AI just

kind of, like, bombarding
us on a daily basis?

every which way.

Uh, I love it though.

Um, I will say AI is really
enabling us to move faster

and personalize experiences
better than ever before.

And, um, I like to think
of like pre-AI loyalty

programs or experiences in
general like static images.

They're fixed, they're
one size fits all,

probably a bit passive.

Um, and then AI kind
of transforms it all.

Like, you're now in this
like live adaptive experience

where things are like
responding to your actions.

You're-- It's more
personalized, uh, and it's

constantly evolving b- and
like learning based off

of your input and output.

Um, it really just enables
us to build something

that's a little bit
more dynamic and custom.

So like my experience, like if
I could do this all over again

post-AI, I would love to have
something that's very tailored

to that individual person.

So Elle, you could log in
to Disney+ and get a whole

different experience than
if I logged in into Disney+,

um, the program or even
the experience in general.

And I don't know, it's
just truly remarkable

the, the, the, the pace
at which AI is helping

evolve product experiences.

And I know AI had a bad
rap for like a minute.

I think it still kind

thing?"

rap but, but it also has
a, like a very hopeful,

you

Exactly.

I would say

Yeah, I think if it's
done right, if it's done

right, um, and there's
guardrails in place, I

I

Guardrails for sure, yeah

see this consumer mental
model shift of starting to

see the value in, in AI, and
it's helping their everyday

life or just making things
more one-to-one, I would

Yeah.

Yeah.

If I'm thinking about it, like
just the way consumer behavior

is changing with AI, right?

And like now we are bringing
a lot more context to our

digital footprint when
we use some of these,

um, LLMs, for example.

So leveraging just that
behavior of consumers, and

how does that, how does
that influence the way

that they behave then with
your product in particular?

And how can you take that
context and create an

experience or a loyalty
program that is best

fit with that one-to-one
subscriber that you

Exactly.

Yeah.

You think about like
logging in, 'cause I

mean, right now it's we're
gonna offer this offer

to everyone that logs in.

It now could be we're
offering this pr- this,

uh, what is the saying?

Right offer to the right
person at the right time

is essentially where we
wanna get to, and I think

AI helps enable that.

Yeah.

We're con- that's been
a phrase that I've heard

as a product marketer
for a while now, but

I think it's something
that we're constantly

trying to improve on.

Um, so it's, yeah, it's kind
of exciting to see how it

can go with guardrails in
like in a non-creepy way, of

course.

Exactly.

Okay.

So you're at Netflix now.

So what lessons from this
playbook are you taking with

you in your role at Netflix?

Honestly, so many learnings.

Um, you know, as product
marketers, our primary

stakeholders are product
managers for the most part.

Um, so I think for me, it's
just really being able to

understand the why behind
something, like working

upstream to help shape and
drive product strategy, um,

based on consumer research
and audience analysis.

I think it's so important
to really have a seat at the

table upstream to, again,
drive that product strategy.

We aren't just
about go-to-market.

It-- Like, I think it's
so important to be part

of that early product
development, giving feedback

on designs, um, in product
copy, just ensuring that

we're building something
our consumers actually want.

Um, and it ma- at the end
of the day, like when we're

part of that upstream and
we understand the product in

its entirety, it makes it so
much easier for us as product

marketers to position it
later on and message that to,

to drive the, the adoption
and, and usage of that.

Uh, one other thing
I was thinking about

is really the, the…

what we talked around,
around like beyond the

core product experience.

Again, sometimes PMs are
just so focused on shipping

new features or enhancements
for the product that they're

working on, that sometimes
they don't really have a

pulse on the strategies
outside of the product.

For example, um, you
know, how can we as PMMs

drive value through other
important moments during a

customer lifecycle stage?

Um, for example, highlighting
features to drive adoption

and usage that may have
like lost priority.

Like maybe it was a feature
that was built two years ago.

We had a huge launch and
it's super valuable to

the company, but kind
of like lost priority.

So how does PMM step in
and say, "Hey, how can we

continue advancing usage
of this feature, build

awareness, drive adoption
that ul- ultimately

drives business outcomes?"

Um, again, we wanna highlight
all the great work that

our product teams do.

Um, and I don't know.

We just have to start
thinking about things

like at Netflix, right?

What is, what's
beyond content?

That's something that
I keep thinking about

here at Netflix.

We have such a strong
content slate, and if you

look at any advertisement
around Netflix, it's very

content focused, right?

It's "Stranger Things,"
it's "Wednesday," but there

is so much work that our
product teams do to make

our Netflix members have
such a delightful experience

when they're opening the
application and using it.

And I think it's, um, a big
opportunity for us to see how

do we start marrying product
innovation with content

narratives, um, whether it's
through advertisements or

even just some of our, our
messaging and positioning

within the product, um, and
o- and off service marketing.

So just some things I'm
thinking about is like Again,

to recap, one, sitting within
like a product management

space with loyalty programs,
um, I think helps me a

lot just understanding the
ins and outs of what I'm

gonna market eventually.

And then two, just
ensuring that I'm thinking

holistically beyond just
the product experience.

Yeah.

That's so powerful the way
that you described that.

Um, and it reminds me of
something that I heard, I

can't remember who I got
it from, some other product

marketing influencer voice
would talk about how product

marketers are responsible
for deeply understanding

what it is about your product
that is truly remarkable

to your target audience.

And it sounds like that's
some of the work that

you're doing, like beyond
just content, as you said.

Like what about maybe it's
a feature, maybe it's an ex-

a certain product experience
that not, isn't necessarily

consuming content, but maybe
it's something else that's

just a delightful feature
that kind of like captures

the, you know, the loyalty,
the retention, et cetera.

So I really appreciate
that thought.

Yeah.

Okay, my last question for
you on this topic, James.

What's one last piece
of advice you have for a

PMM who is in the midst
of building a con- a

customer loyalty program?

Yeah, this is a good question.

Um, I think I touched on
it lightly before, but

I would say don't fall
for the fallacy of build

it and they will come.

Do the upfront work of
identifying the problem

through research, data
analysis, come up with a

hypothesis, validate that,
that hypothesis through

testing, and then develop
a loyalty program strategy.

Just ensuring that it
doesn't feel transactional

but emotional.

It's tied to the brand.

That's, that's really
the sweet spot.

And again, as I stated
earlier, you may find that

loyalty is probably not gonna
move the needle for you,

and it may be it's okay to
say, "Hey, this isn't gonna

move the needle and maybe
this isn't our best option."

Uh, but you have to have
that discipline to look at

the data and say, "Okay,
this is gonna work," or, "We

wanna continue testing before
we're agreeing to something."

Again, this is just to
really ensure that what

you're building is what your
customers say that they want.

Um, again, and the work
doesn't stop when you launch.

The likelihood of you getting
everything within your,

your first launch, like
the wish list essentially

for MVP, is, is not likely.

So you're gonna have to
constantly evaluate results,

improve where you can based on
insights, customer feedback,

all of that fun stuff.

But yeah, just, just be,
be, be very, uh, aware

of the build it and they
will come fallacy and just

make sure that there's
data that's backing up the

justification to move forward.

Yeah.

I, I love that.

And something that as you
were talking, what made

me think of is that, like,
sometimes reward programs

don't have to be so, like,
transactional feeling,

especially with, you know,
the, I'll say the hopefulness

that we have around with AI.

It can feel more like
relational intelligence,

and remembering that
there's a person behind the

screen who is interacting
with your product.

And to, the closer you can get
to the one-on-one feeling is

probably gonna feel a little
bit more… The customer

will feel more understood
and, you know, eager,

willing to stick around.

Agreed.

Yeah, and just to add to
that, I think you hit on

an important point of this
emotional relationship, right?

I think what we launched when
I was there, um, was very MVP.

Like, this was like
bare bones, let's

get something out.

The ideas, um, for the
future of this program

are out of this world.

Um, it'll take some time
to get there, but I know

that the team that is
now leading it, um, I,

I'm very close with them.

They're doing a fantastic
job of, of, uh, of getting

it to, to that vision
that we had early on.

Um, so y- I can't
wait for everyone to

follow

should bring him on.

We should bring him on
and have like a part two.

We can do like a, we can do
like a three-person interview.

You can kind of like recap
the like the early days,

the vision, and then they
can kind of chime in.

Okay, I love it.

We're gonna do it.

All right, so now
it's time for the next

segment of our show.

This is the
messaging critique.

This is where, as product
marketing experts, we get to

analyze real-world messaging.

And the fun part is, James,
as the guest of my show, you

get to pick the company that
we are critiquing today.

Really quickly, I'm gonna run
through some ground rules.

You're gonna pick a company,
or you have picked a company

that, um, you are the target
audience or you know the

target audience really well.

It kind of makes it more
fair to do a critique.

And you're gonna tell
me what stood out to you

about the messaging, um,
something you wish the

product marketer would've
considered differently,

and then we'll iterate a
little bit on how they can

take it to the next level.

So without… Yeah,
without further ado, please

share the company that
we are critiquing today

So I'm gonna do a full 180
on you because, um, I don't

know if it was fair for me
to critique another, like,

entertainment provider
or in the SVOD space.

So I'm gonna do, uh,
BODYARMOR, the sports drink.

I know it.

I've had it.

Tell me more.

Tell me more.

Like, a little bit, like,
yeah, just for our listeners.

Get the listeners up to speed

Yeah.

So I don't-- I wanna
do them justice.

I'm, I'm pulling from their
website, um, quickly on just

like what they are because
I think a lot of people will

conflate… I think there's
like Bodyarmor phone cases.

There's also

true.

Yes, there's a ton of
different products out

there with similar names.

Yeah

So, uh, it was founded
by Mike Repole in 2011,

and he went out to
challenge the status quo.

He was tired of outdated
sports drinks and artificial

ingredients, so he created
Bodyarmor with a clear

mission to deliver a
better-for-you sports drink

made with no artificial
dyes, flavors, or sweeteners,

packed with potassium-rich
electrolytes, antioxidants,

and coconut water.

Um, and the, his ethos
is choose better.

And in 2021, Coca-Cola fully
acquired Bodyarmor under

the ONE Powerhouse hydration
portfolio alongside Powerade.

So, they have quite a few
products, uh, but I wanted

to hone in on Bodyarmor
Lyte, uh, which is the

coconut water-based, um,
healthy sports drink with

the no artificial dyes
and only 25 calories.

Um, I'm a big calorie counter.

Yeah.

so

walk us through Yelp.

Like, what's, what

yeah

really well?

Um, this one was hard
for me, honestly.

Yeah.

It's, um,

is hard, yeah

uh, if you were to visit
their site, they tend to

have individual pages for
each of their product.

Their hero page is talking
about one of their newer

releases, which is like, I
would say probably combating,

um, or, or competing with
that of like Celsius.

Um, but if you were to
like look at just their

larger positioning, um, or
messaging, they're leaning

heavily into the ethos
that I mentioned previously

of Choose

better.

Yeah, exactly,
rewrite your routine.

Um, and for me, I
mean, I liked that.

I assume they're trying
to convey of like, "Hey,

switch up your routine.

Choose a better sports drink."
I think healthier is implied

here, but I don't know.

It was kinda hard for me.

Like I know their target
audience is, you know,

probably athletes, um, you
know, people that want a

healthier option, um, like

myself,

where

probably people who are like
somewhat health conscious,

who exercise on a regular
basis, who care about having,

you know, a drink with
electrolytes, um, but maybe

who get frustrated by having
things like artificial dyes.

You know?

I mean, I'm constantly looking
at labels to see ingredients

and things like artificial or
added sweeteners and stuff.

I'm like, "Nah," it's, it's
usually a pass for me, but

I still want a lot of that.

You

know?

Or maybe like, yeah

exactly, like an alternative
to coconut water, right?

Like could be, um, something,
like maybe a similar, like

an adjacent audience, right?

That's kind of
what I'm thinking.

Okay, so what they're doing
really well maybe is like

starting to capture some
of that with that, you

know, um, it seems a little
bit like aspirational a

bit, like choose better,
like hopeful, encouraging.

Um, so like what w- as you
kind of think through that,

on the flip side of that
then, what do you think, what

do you wish the PMM would've
considered differently?

I don't even know if
they have PMMs, but let's

assume that they do.

They probably have just
like a brand team or

like an agency, but

That, that sounds
like a brand slogan.

Um,

does, yeah

uh, I guess a little
quick backstory.

So I came across this
at Costco last year, um,

and like it's part
of our shopping list.

Yeah.

It's part of our
shopping list.

I'm very sad when
it's not there.

Um, somebody probably
forgot to place the order.

Um, but it's-- Again,
it's-- For the messaging

for me, it falls a bit flat.

Uh, like as an avid
consumer, I… If I saw

this, like I just always
think about a billboard.

Like you have like
three seconds to capture

an audience, right?

Um, if you're like driving
down a freeway or something.

So if I saw this in a picture
of a billboard, I always

think of it in that way.

I would just think it
was another sports drink.

If it was that and it said,
"Choose better, rewrite

your routine," for me, I
would be like, "Oh, well,

why would I go with this?

I'll just drink Powerade,"

Yeah.

or, or some other
sports drink.

Maybe not quite
motivating enough.

Like, 'cause it

seems like, yeah, yeah,
'cause it seems like the

choose better, rewrite your
routine, it's definitely

punchy, but it's almost
like if there's… It's kind

of missing the, like, why,

you know?

Like, it's not, um… And
maybe it's there in some

context, and like, no, we
had, just haven't seen it.

But sorry, I'll let you
kind of keep talking

No, good.

I, and I do know they like
list a lot of the ingredients,

um, on the bottle itself
where it's like no artificial

dyes, but it's, it's hard
for somebody to see, right?

Like you have to-- There's
some intent there that

you're curious to see what
this is, but you need to

first create that awareness
of like what this is to

even pick up the bottle.

And, um, like for me, I
think choose better, like

to your point, like what
am I choosing better?

I'm not sure.

And, you know, how am I gonna
rewrite r- m- my, rewrite

my routine by doing this?

For me, it's like it's
more fulfilling a need

at the moment 'cause I
need to quench my thirst.

So I think the routine is,
is, uh, is a bit of a stretch.

I don't know.

For

Yeah.

Yeah.

I bet they're-- I wonder
if maybe they're kind of

tr- getting at or hinting
to people who have their,

like, their go-to, right?

'Cause BODYARMOR, because
they came a little bit

later to the sports drink
conversation, they, um,

they're probably trying to
wedge themselves into an

audience that has their, like,
go-to drink that they buy.

Like, you now have BODYARMOR
on your standard, you

know, Costco purchase list.

Other people probably have,
like, whether it's Powerade

or, you know, Gatorade or,
you know, whatever it is.

Um, I wonder if there's,
like, that's kind of what

they're hinting at, but theirs
is the, like, healthier,

quote-unquote, alternative.

okay, so what do you think
they could do to take

it to the next level?

What would you
like to see them?

How would you-- how could
you imagine that they,

like, really take off with
their differentiation?

Yeah.

So I'm, like, not a copywriter
by trade, but I think it could

be something more compelling
around, you know, pure

hydration without the fake
stuff you can't pronounce.

Like, kind of like being a
little cheeky about it, like

poke fun at the competition.

Um, or even like, I think
the coconut water is

a huge differentiator.

I didn't even know
that, and I've like,

I've consumed a
lot of body armor.

Yeah.

It's, it's, it's coconut
water, so it's like, you

know, coconut, coconut
water sports drink, no

fake stuff, 25 calories.

Like, for me, that
would catch my eye.

One, I'm like, I'm really
not a fan of coconut water,

but I know how helpful
it is for hydration.

It just, for me, I can't do
the taste, but to know that

something is like mango-based
and like coconut water with

25 calories, like for me, that
would really draw my attention

and make me wanna learn more.

Um, Yeah

I feel like there needs to
be more emphasis on that

I really--

Yeah, I could totally picture
them, like, diving deep into

the lake, um, just being
a little bit more bold and

they're-- and aggressive
with, like, focusing on, like,

what you said, the fake stuff
that you can't pronounce.

Yep.

That's a b- for-- That
is something that I do.

It's huge.

I can't tell you how many
times I'm at the grocery

store, and I look at the
back of a label, and if

it's got something weird
that I can't pronounce,

unless it's something
that is a must-have in my

household, I don't buy it.

I put it back.

So if that's, if that
is a characteristic, a

characterical behavior
of their target audience,

that could be something
that they lean into.

You know what I'm realizing?

In your answer and your
suggestion for how they can

take it to the next level,
it really mirrors w- some

of the activity that you did
as you were building out a

customer loyalty program, is
to dig in and to look deeper

on the value that-- like,
to look at your existing

customer base and understand
the perceived value, do some

of that research, like, build
out some of those, some of

that segmentation of your
existing customers, and then,

y- you know, try to take it
to the next level in that way.

And maybe, maybe they have
done some of that, but I was

just kind of drawing out the
parallels that I was seeing

between, like, your style in
particular that I think is,

um, you know, very helpful.

Clearly a successful one.

Full circle moment.

Yes, totally.

Okay.

Well, shout-out to
Bodyarmor and any Bodyarmor

marketers out there.

You've definitely
got some fans.

I'm a big-- I've definitely
consumed a lot of Bodyarmor.

So, all right.

So James, there's one thing
that I like to make space

for on this podcast, and that
is a moment of gratitude.

We truly do not get
anywhere in product

marketer-- marketing in
general, honestly, without

learning from each other.

So I'm so grateful that you
have taken the generosity and

time to come on and share our,
your expertise on the show.

So thank you so much.

Um, and I would love to
turn it around to you and

hear some shout-outs for
some PMMs who have brought

you to this moment and
contributed to the awesome

PMM that you are today.

Thank you, one, for having me.

So, so thankful.

Um, this is gonna be an Oscar
moment for me 'cause you're

gonna start playing the
music, but, um, I'm gonna c-

you know, as I'm reading off

my note

card.

Um, but there's been so many
amazing product marketers,

um, I've worked with.

You know, I started off
my career at AT&T in 2012.

Um, Kyle Riley Johnston, um,
he was the leader at Disney+

for global product marketing.

Bright servant leader.

Um, he's one that really
kind of truly kicked off my

product marketing career at
AT&T, so major kudos to him.

Um, my fellow and past
PMMs, especially the ones

at Disney+, um, whether
you're on my team or a

colleague or a leader,
uh, the job is never easy.

We're always like-- We have
seen such talent on the

team, uh, and it's not easy
whenever you're establishing

a new function or you're
having to constantly prove

your value, um, and a battle
for a seat at the table.

Um, so just everyone
that's a product marketer,

I give you major kudos
and hats off to you.

Uh, and finally, um,
I wanna make sure I, I

mention my folks at Netflix.

Um, I've been here for,
uh, it'll be a year in

July, but the talent here
is out of this world.

Um, and I'm just grateful
every day to work alongside

such stunning colleagues.

So thanks again for having me.

Yeah, I love it.

There's nothing like the, um,
relationships that you make

when you're, like, just in
the thick of it with something

just really hard to do in
your professional l- life,

and just having, you know,
those homies that that get you

through it, and then obviously
teach you along the way, so.

Okay, this is my last
question for you.

Where else is it best to
access your expertise?

Can we just find
you on LinkedIn?

Yes, LinkedIn is
probably the best spot.

I'm pretty active on there,
at least when I try to

be when my life,
life isn't crazy.

Yeah.

Um, so send me a, a
request and we can connect.

Awesome.

Again, thank you
so much, James.

And hey, PMM listeners, if
you liked this episode, please

share it with a PMM friend,
and I would be so grateful if

you would leave us a review.

It helps tremendously
with our reach.

Thank you so much
for coming on this

adventure with us today.

I hope this episode leaves
you with inspiration to

take in the next step
of your own journey